Palestine Action has targeted a major weapons factory run by Teledyne, that supplies parts for F-35 jets. These are, of course, the same aircraft the UK refused to stop exporting parts for to Israel. And, they’re the same jets the genocidal state is currently using to bomb Gaza, Lebanon, Yemen – and potentially soon Iran.
Palestine Action: shutting down Teledyne’s F-35 ops
Activists from Palestine Action climbed onto the roof of an American owned weapons factory, Teledyne CML Composites, in Wirral, on Tuesday 2 October. From the rooftop, they cut holes into the roof and sprayed blood red paint into the factory:
BREAKING: Palestine Action are on the roof of Teledyne's weapons factory, disrupting the producers of crucial components for Israel's F-35 fighter jets.
In solidarity with the Palestinian, Lebanese, and Yemeni people subjected to Israel’s daily massacres, activists have once again successfully shut down the site known to supply crucial parts for the murderous F-35 fighter jet programme.
As Palestine Action said on X, the group contaminated Teledyne’s clean room. This will “will cause severe disruption to the production of Israel’s F-35 fighter jet components”:
Contamination of this clean room will cause severe disruption to the production of Israel's F-35 fighter jet components.
When our government fails to abide by their legal duty to end complicity in genocide, it's up to ordinary people to take action.
Teledyne CML’s parent company, Teledyne Technologies, is the single-largest exporter of weaponry from Britain to Israel, while ‘CML Composites’ specialises in ‘Aircraft Structural Components’ for the F-35 fighter jet programme.
The ties between Teledyne CML and Israel’s genocide in Gaza run deep, with the Wirral factory also acting as a supplier to numerous other ‘Tier 1’ F-35 partners – including BAE Systems, Marand, and Magellan. To BAE Systems alone, Teledyne CML provides at least ten different “Special processes” for their F-35 programme contributions.
By maintaining approval for F-35 component export licenses for end-use in Israel, the British government remains an activist participant in Israel’s genocidal, criminal attacks on Gaza and Lebanon.
The F-35 fighter jet has been responsible for the delivery of thousands of 2,000lb and 4,000lb bombs on targets including tented refugee encampments in Gaza, and healthcare workers in Lebanon. Today’s action serves to demonstrate that, while the British state might be comfortable in facilitating these acts – Palestine Action cannot permit them.
Not the first time Palestine Action has acted
This action is not the first time that Palestine Action have struck at the Bromborough site, driving a van through the factory gates in July 2024, before drenching the premises in red paint as a symbol of the Palestinian bloodshed it facilitates.
Its sister site, Teledyne Defence and Space, Shipley, was targeted by an occupation in April 2024, preventing the manufacture of military electronics bound for Israel. Earlier this month, a jury at Bradford Crown Court refused to convict the activists, who stood accused of ‘criminal damage’ for their action.
The following article is a comment piece from Stop The War Coalition about the next national march for Palestine on Saturday 5 October – just as Israel increases its regional aggression.
Israel’s assassination of Hassan Nasrullah and its brutal attacks on Lebanese civilians have appalled people around the world. Using its unlimited supply of US weapons, Israel is writing in the blood of Palestinians, Lebanese, Yemenis and others that it seeks total war in the Middle East.
Israel’s onslaught continues, so Britain continues to march
This Saturday’s demonstration to mark a year of Israel’s genocide against the Palestinians was always going to be crucial. Now more than ever we need to turn it into a massive display of anger against the slaughter, against the spread of war and our government’s collusion.
We are asking all our members and supporters to do the following as a matter of urgency.
If you are outside London please organise coaches or other transport from every corner of the country and rush details to us so that we can publicise them on the website – here. Even if you are simply meeting up at your local station or planning a car pool to the demo let us know and we can spread the word.
Wherever you are, please organise leafleting sessions or stalls at your local station, high street, or town centres. We have specified Wednesday as a day of action to do this. Again, send in details.
Put up posters in your windows and local shops to spread the word. Contact us and we will send you posters.
You can order leaflets and posters by emailing office@stopwar.org.uk – please do send us reports of all arrangements.
The documents detail two separate meetings between government ministers and Elbit Systems UK, the British arm of Israel’s biggest weapons firm, Elbit Systems Ltd. Both meetings focused on how the UK’s judicial system deals with Palestine Action activists who carry out direct action against the arms manufacturer.
The objectives of both meetings were to reassure Elbit Systems that the government cares about the harm Palestine Action is causing to the Israeli weapons maker and the wider private sector.
The first of these documented meetings took place on 2 March 2022 between Elbit Systems UK’s CEO Martin Fausset and the then-home secretary, Priti Patel.
Patel formerly resigned from her position as secretary of state, after holding twelve undisclosed meetings in Israel with officials, businessmen, Netanyahu and the country’s security minister – immediately raising questions around her own impartiality.
The meeting between the two parties focused on protests and security at Elbit Systems. Key points raised by the private secretary in the meeting acknowledged that:
Palestine Action’s criminal activity is for the police to investigate and though they are operationally independent of government, meaning [the Government] cannot direct their response… officials have been in contact with the police about PA.
However, they also said:
the Government is working, where appropriate, to ensure that those who engage in criminal activity progress through the Criminal Justice System.
“Threats to Elbit” discussed with government minister
According to the second documented meeting, held on 19 April 2023, “threats to manufacturing at Elbit Systems from protest groups” were discussed between Elbit Systems and Chris Philp, the then-minister of state for crime, policing, and fire.
The document also noted that:
A Director from the Attorney General’s Office will be attending to represent the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS). The CPS declined to participate in this meeting to preserve their operational independence.
This contradictory statement appears to be included to obfuscate the violation of General Principle 2.1 of the CPS code of conduct which bars prosecutors from any political interference and improper influence. A violation of the code should amount to an abuse of process and dismissals of prosecutions against Palestine Action activists.
The documents also noted that:
although there have been successful prosecutions of Palestine Action members, there have been multiple instances of charges being dropped and defendants acquitted by juries and magistrates.
Previously, the Israeli embassy interfered in Palestine Action trials by lobbying the former Attorney General in May 2022. During this meeting, the Israeli government discussed the availability of legal defences for British activists, which coincided with the courts increasingly disallowing activists to argue that their actions were proportional to the crimes of the weapons factories they disrupted.
One section of the documents – which were heavily redacted – was the section on ‘past lobbying’.
Elbit and Israel’s collusion over Palestine Action with the Tories
Palestine Action said in a statement:
These documents highlight collusion between government ministers, the CPS, the Attorney General’s office, and a foreign private arms manufacturer. The presence of such collusion highlights a clear abuse of power, with the Government prioritising its relationship with the genocidal Israeli state over the democratic rights of its citizens.
Both parties are evidently unhappy with the fact that charges against Palestine Action’s activists are sometimes dropped, and our defendants fairly acquitted by juries and magistrates.
Our judicial system should act as an impartial body distinctly separate from government, and yet, these documents reveal that in the case of Palestine Action, the Government is working on behalf of Elbit Systems UK to ensure this is not so — with their political interference in the prosecution of our cases having a direct impact on the civil liberties of our activists.
The group noted that:
The first of Palestine Action’s activists to receive a conviction did so on the 29th of March, 2022—shortly after Patel and Fausset’s meeting—and it’s likely that political interference has shaped the outcomes of cases against us. Furthermore, the police have escalated their use — and subsequent abuse — of counter-terrorism powers to indefinitely keep activists in detention, though Palestine Action simply does not fit the definition of a terrorist organisation.
When asked by the Guardian to comment on these documents, the current Home Office responded as follows:
We fully respect the operational independence of the police and the independent judiciary, which remains the bedrock of our policing model. These meetings took place under the previous government.
This is not over
The Home Office acknowledged that the previous government did not respect the operational independence of the judiciary and are trying to absolve themselves of any responsibility. However, there are over 100 activists from Palestine Action who were charged before the new government came into power.
Palestine Action concluded:
We demand full transparency and a public review of all charging decisions made against Palestine Action, as there is clear evidence that such prosecutions were wrongfully influenced by Elbit Systems, the Israeli or/and the UK government. We also call for the immediate release of our sixteen political prisoners.
Ten years ago, as the streets of Hong Kong pulsed with pro-democracy demonstrations, riot police repeatedly fired pepper spray and tear gas at the crowds that sometimes swelled to more than 100,000.
To protect themselves, protesters held up umbrellas – which became an iconic image of the protests that went viral in local and international media. Yellow became the protest umbrella color for its contrast against the dark clothing of many demonstrators, and the protests became known as the “Umbrella Movement.”
It was the largest show of civil disobedience since control of the former British colony was handed over to China in 1997. Tens of thousands of people, many of them students, camped in the streets and for 11 weeks occupied much of the business district of the city of 7 million people.
What sparked the protests?
The protesters’ main demand was the right to elect the chief executive of Hong Kong, which was promised in the Basic Law, the constitution for post-handover Hong Kong as a “special autonomous region” of China under the “one country, two systems” formula that gave the city some autonomy and the right to retain its system for 50 years.
Small protests over the lack of movement on candidate selection had been increasing when, on Aug. 31, 2014, China’s parliament decreed that elections in Hong Kong in 2017 would be permitted — from a list of candidates pre-approved by Beijing and nominated by a body of business elites and pro-Beijing groups.
Pro-democracy protesters open their umbrellas to mark one month since they took the street, in the Admiralty district of Hong Kong, Oct. 28, 2014. (Nicolas Asfouri/AFP)
The ruling sent people out into the streets banging pots and pans and chanting, and prompted waves of university campus strikes and protests.
Pro-democracy leaders formed plans for a civil disobedience campaign against the decision, releasing a manifesto called “Occupy Central with Love and Peace” and calling for the takeover of streets outside the city’s financial district on Oct. 1, China’s national day.
A fast-moving series of campus protests and actions by student groups to take over city streets led “Occupy Central” to be moved up several days.
People built a protest city of tents and stages that rang out with protest songs while students did homework in camps. Activists and ordinary citizens demonstrated outside government headquarters and occupied city intersections and thoroughfares.
How did umbrellas get involved?
Hong Kong authorities declared the protests illegal and a “violation of the rule of law,” and tensions began to mount.
On the night of Sept. 26 and into the next day, riot police clashed with protesters on the streets, firing pepper spray at them and arresting some. Over subsequent days, protesters began using umbrellas to protect themselves.
“The image is a poignant one, and emphasizes the asymmetry of force: an innocuous household object held up against helmeted police officers wielding poisonous substances for crowd control,” the U.S. publication Quartz wrote.
Riot police use pepper spray against protesters after thousands of people block a main road to the financial central district outside the government headquarters in Hong Kong, Sept. 28, 2014. (Vincent Yu/AP)
The first known appearance of the term “umbrella revolution” was in the hashtag #UmbrellaRevolution generated by a news aggregator and circulated with a Sept. 28, 2014, report on the protests in the online edition of the British daily, The Independent.
Use of the hashtag along with eye-catching umbrella photographs spread among Hong Kong journalists and activists. The outpouring of umbrella memes included clever Cantonese puns and word play – and even a meme featuring Chinese paramount leaderXi Jinping holding a yellow umbrella.
Was the Umbrella Movement an example of a “revolution?”
Despite the worldwide sympathy for Hong Kong protesters, campaign leaders were quick to disavow the term “revolution.”
They flatly rejected comparisons to the color revolutions that had seen authoritarian governments in former Soviet republics and elsewhere overthrown, stressing their focus on practical reforms.
“We are not seeking revolution. We just want democracy!” Joshua Wong, a leading figure of the student movement, was quoted by The Washington Post.
“This is not a color revolution,” Lester Shum, the deputy leader of the Hong Kong Federation of Students, told the Post.
Riot police fire tear gas on student protesters occupying streets surrounding the government headquarters in Hong Kong, Sept. 29, 2014. (Wally Santana/AP)
Protest leaders warned that talk of revolution would alienate the broader Hong Kong public and give ammunition to Chinese Communist Party leaders who viewed the protests as rebellion and wanted to crush them.
The mainstream Occupy Central campaign agreed on “Umbrella Movement,” but some groups that advocated more aggressive tactics continued to use “Umbrella Revolution.”
The occupation and protests that began on Sept. 26 lasted in pockets of Hong Kong for 79 days, until Dec. 15.
They did not achieve their goal of universal suffrage and Wong, Shum and many protest leaders are in jail, while others have gone into exile to avoid arrest under draconian security and sedition laws.
This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by By Paul Eckert for RFA.
Two Youth Demand supporters have taken action at the Labour conference by painting ‘GENOCIDE CONFERENCE’ on the front entrance. Youth Demand are calling for a two-way arms embargo on Israel and for the new UK government to halt all new oil and gas licences granted since 2021.
Labour conference IS a genocide conference
At around 10:50am on Tuesday 24 September, two Youth Demand supporters walked up to the security check-in building, where all guests must pass through, of the Labour Party conference being held in Liverpool and spray pained ‘GENOCIDE’ and were part way through writing ‘CONFERENCE’ before they were tackled by plain clothes police officers and arrested:
Labour claims their national conference is 'democracy in action'.
This is a fucking joke. In reality they have sold our democracy to arms and fossil fuel companies. We will not allow their death project to continue.
A Youth Demand spokesperson said of the Labour conference:
Labour is still arming Israel despite a majority of the public backing a complete arms embargo. Despite admitting there is a ‘clear risk’ of ‘serious violation of international humanitarian law’, they have spinelessly suspended less than 10% of arms licenses.
They claim their national conference is ‘democracy in action’. This is a joke when in reality Labour sold our democracy to arms and fossil fuel companies. Just last week it was revealed Starmer accepted a £4,000,000 donation from a hedge fund with hundreds of millions of pounds worth of shares in fossil fuels and weapons.
History shows us that it will take ordinary people stepping into disruptive action to get us the real arms embargo we need. From October, we’re taking to the streets all across the country – sign up to join us youthdemand.org/take-action.
Youth Demand are one of the groups supporting the nonviolent demonstration ‘POLITICS IS BROKEN – THE UMBRELLA MARCH‘ due to be held by Umbrella on 2 November, leaving from Parliament Square at 2pm.
Not listening to the public
One of those taking action at the Labour conference was Danny Lusardi, 23, a graduate from Lancaster. He said:
The Labour government has admitted the arms it’s selling to Israel are being used for war crimes. But still they’re happy to keeping licensing 90% of those sales. We’re here to show them the British public can’t accept that.
It’s our duty as citizens to hold our government to account. When they won’t listen to the democratic will of the people, that means breaking windows and spraying paint.
As we approach a year of watching Israel’s genocide on the news and social media, it’s time to ask ourselves: are we serious about ending it now?
All this comes after another incident involving protesters.
The activists from campaign group Climate Resistance infiltrated the Labour conference audience. They unfurled a banner reading “Still backing polluters, still arming Israel – we voted for change”. “We are still selling arms to Israel! I thought we voted for change, Rachel!” the protestor shouted.
Shockingly, security can be seen getting the guy in a chokehold in an attempt to remove him from the conference floor:
A Youth Demand spokesperson said:
Young people will not stand by as long as governments are supporting genocide. We deserve better. Young people all over the country are coming together to resist. Youth Demand is taking all across the country in October.
You can sign up for action at on the Youth Demand website here.
Featured image and additional images via Youth Demand
Palestine Action has been at it again in Bristol – this time, using a van to disrupt the factory of Elbit Systems in Filton. It shows for the umpteenth time that direct action does work – as the group halted production, therefore stopped arms going to Israel to be used in its genocide in Gaza, and terrorism in Lebanon. It also shows that activists are unafraid of the consequences of their direct action – as ten people who targeted the site previously are now in prison.
Palestine Action: undeterred by the rain
On Monday 23 September, activists from Palestine Action used a van to block the only entrance into Elbit Systems research, development, and manufacturing hub in Filton, Bristol:
Once in place, Palestine Action began to spray the road with blood-red paint using repurposed fire extinguishers:
Palestine Action also displayed a banner which read ‘Free the Filton10’. This was referring to 10 activists who are imprisoned before trial after being accused of costing Elbit’s Filton premises over £1m in damages:
BREAKING: Palestine Action block Elbit’s research and manufacturing hub in Filton, Bristol.
The British state reacted to a previous action which cost the Israeli weapons maker over £1million in damages by imprisoning the #Filton10.
Elbit Systems is Israel’s largest weapons firm. It manufactures weapons which are marketed as “battle-tested” on the Palestinian people. The Israeli weapons maker producers 85% of Israel’s military drone fleet and land-based equipment, amongst other arms used to commit genocide in Gaza.
Elbit Systems frequently uses Gaza as a laboratory to develop new weaponry. At Elbit Systems Second Quarter 2024 Results, CEO Bezhalel Machlis said:
The portfolio was improved drastically and this war has been an accelerator for many developments. The IDF (Israel Defense Forces) is using these technologies now and in the future, we will bring them to the rest of the market as well.
The Filton weapons hub was opened in July of last year, with Israeli Ambassador Tzipi Hotevely in attendance. Freedom of Information disclosures show Filton’s ‘Elbit Systems UK’ has existent export licenses for the sale of weaponry to Israel. Weaponry seen during the previous action at the site on 6 August included the same model of quadcopter drones used by the Israeli military to mimic women and children crying to lure Palestinians in and kill them.
The British state continues to imprison the ‘Filton10’ in a bid to serve the interests Israel’s biggest weapons firm over the rights and freedoms of it’s own citizens. However, we refuse to allow a company profiting from the genocide of Palestinians in Gaza to continue operations on our streets. Despite the attempts to deter us, we are continuing our direct action campaign until Elbit is shut down for good.
Featured image and additional images via Palestine Action
The Palestine solidarity movement will converge on Liverpool for the Labour Party conference to demand the government take action on Israel’s genocide. Meanwhile, inside the conference it’s emerged that Labour Party officials have banned the use of the words “genocide” and “apartheid” in publicity materials – in relation to Israel’s genocide and apartheid.
The 19th national march for Palestine since October 2023 will take place on Saturday 21 September and is the first to be held outside London. Tens of thousands of demonstrators will march through Liverpool to the perimeter of the Labour Party conference to demand the UK government take meaningful action to end Israel’s genocide in Gaza and in support of Palestinian rights.
The march leaves St George’s Plateau, Lime St Station, Liverpool at 12pm. There will be a rally at Pier Head from 2pm. Full details are here.
Labour protest
In the first national March for Palestine outside of London, Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC) and its coalition partners have brought the movement for freedom, justice and equality for Palestinians to the Labour Party conference.
On Wednesday, the UN General Assembly voted overwhelmingly to affirm the historic ruling by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in July and trigger the legal obligation of all states to end complicity in Israel’s illegal occupation and apartheid regime, including through an arms embargo.
Shamefully, the UK abstained in the vote, following a pattern of complicity with Israel’s violations of international law.
Despite the continuation of what the ICJ accepted to be a plausible case of genocide in Gaza, and the application made by the prosecutor of the International Criminal Court for arrest warrants for Israeli leaders, the UK government has continued to speak of Israel as a key ally.
Earlier this month the Foreign Secretary David Lammy accepted that there is a clear risk that UK arms exports might be used to commit serious violations of international law – but his response – to suspend 30 out of 350 arms export licenses to Israel – has been condemned as inadequate and ineffective by campaigners. In particular, he excluded indirect exports of components to Israel for the F-35 combat aircraft, known to have been used to massacre civilians in Gaza.
Banned from saying ‘genocide’
Whilst the national March for Palestine will be outside conference, PSC will continue its work inside the conference with two important fringe meetings on Monday 23 September.
At 1pm “Labour, Palestine, and Islamophobia” will be a discussion on the alienation of Muslim and other minority communities from Labour due to its position on Gaza and what the party must do to recover lost support and confront the threat of the far right.
At 6pm a panel on “Justice for Palestine: confronting genocide and ending apartheid” will urge the government to do more to end Israel’s genocidal assault on Gaza and unlawful occupation.
PSC was not allowed to use the words “genocide” or “apartheid” in their description of their fringe meeting in the official conference guide, which instead lists the fringe meeting simply as ‘Justice for Palestine’.
This is yet another example of the Labour leadership refusing to address the realities affirmed by numerous human rights monitoring bodies, and this year by the ICJ, that Israel is practising the crime of apartheid. It also ignores the evidence accepted as plausible by the ICJ that Israel is now committing the crime of genocide.
PSC has also been supported by constituency Labour parties and trade unions in attempting to secure a motion for debate on Palestine at the conference. Motions on Palestine – calling for international law to be upheld and a complete stop to arms exports to Israel – are on the conference agenda, but it has not yet been decided whether they will be debated.
It is feared that factions linked to the party leadership will seek to push the motions off the agenda to avoid embarrassment to the government, and avoid any discussions that are critical of Israel’s actions or call for its government to be held to account.
Israel IS committing genocide – yet Labour won’t let you say it
Ben Jamal, PSC Director, said:
Israel is committing a genocide, after decades of illegal military occupation of Palestinian land and decades of practicing the crime of apartheid on all Palestinians. The vast majority of the world’s governments believe it is time Israel was held to account and sanctioned for repeatedly and flagrantly violating international law. The narrow band of governments that stand in the way of upholding international law shamefully includes our own.
The Labour government knows that Israel is committing crimes in Gaza and the West Bank. But instead of honouring its obligations under international law, it is still seeking to shield Israel from accountability. It is shocking and unacceptable that this government would remain actively complicit with a state that commits genocide and practices apartheid, but that is the case. That is why we bring our movement for Palestinian freedom, justice and equality to the Labour party conference.
The wider labour movement, as demonstrated by the motion passed unanimously by the TUC at its recent congress, is calling for action to hold Israel to account including a full arms embargo. Opinion polls show that these demands are supported by members in the Labour party and by the wider public. This is a moral test for Keir Starmer and the Labour leadership. They need to stand up for the implementation of international law and be bold in confronting those who undermine it, no matter who they are.
Dozens of underwater minerals experts descended on the remote Cook Islands in the South Pacific this week for a conference that was the latest sign of the country’s embrace of a contentious industry: deepsea mining.
Yet despite goldrush-like promises of a financial windfall, not everyone in this nation of pristine white sand beaches and 15,000 people is convinced its seabed should be exploited for minerals such as manganese and cobalt.
“Protect Our Ocean, #Think Deeply,” declared a 75-square meter sign floated in Avarua Harbour Wednesday by a flotilla of several hundred Cook Islanders who took to the water in a traditional double-hulled vaka, kayaks, jet skis and other vessels.
Potato-sized polymetallic nodules that carpet swathes of the seabed are touted as a potential source of metals needed for green technologies, such as electric vehicle batteries, as the world tries to reduce reliance on fossil fuels.
Skeptics say such minerals are already plentiful on land and warn that mining the seabed could cause irreparable damage to an environment that is still poorly understood.
The seafloor around the Cook Islands is particularly rich in nodules and a 2019 study estimated they could add billions of dollars to its small economy if hoovered up for processing on land.
Alanna Smith, a protest organizer, said the three civil society organizations behind the demonstration wanted to counter a perception that Cook Islanders are unanimously in favor of mining the deep sea.
“Internationally, we wanted to show there is opposition to deepsea mining by local communities here in the Cook Islands,” Smith told Radio Free Asia.
“I think there’s been messages shown that our government has the social license of our people to look further into this industry, but it isn’t the case at all,” she said.
Cook Islands residents are pictured at Rarotonga’s Avarua Harbour during a demonstration against potential deepsea mining, on Sept. 18, 2024. (Akau Media/Te Ipukarea Society)
Significantly more time is needed for independent research to be conducted on the deep sea ecosystem and to foster greater discussion and understanding in the Cook Islands of the potential risks and threats, Smith said. Research published in the journal Nature in July indicated that the nodules produce oxygen.
The country in 2022 issued five-year exploration licenses to three seabed mining companies, although its government hasn’t announced if or when mining could start.
While the Cook Islands is focused on nodules within its vast exclusive economic zone, some Pacific island neighbors such as Nauru are hoping to exploit resources in international waters that are administered by the U.N. affiliated International Seabed Authority, or ISA.
In conjunction with Nasdaq-listed The Metals Company, Nauru’s government has been pressing the ISA to approve mining before its 169 member nations agree on regulations for the industry.
Nauru’s president David Adeang told an ISA meeting in July that deepsea mining was crucial to the survival of his 21 square kilometer (8.1 square mile) island nation and its 10,000 people.
Staying poor?
Similar sentiments are also expressed by leaders in the Cook Islands.
“Do you want to have a wealthy country or do you want us to remain poor for the rest of our lives,” the clerk of the Cook Islands parliament, Tangata Vainerere, said in a Facebook Live interview before the Avarua demonstration.
“I am the head of parliament and I struggle every year to get funding to pay for all the things that I and my people need,” he said.
“Now every other ministry is facing the same problem. So how are we going to solve that problem? We can’t under the current economic strategy.”
The Cook Islands’ tourism-reliant economy suffered a blow from the COVID-19 pandemic, but income per head remains multiple times higher than most other Pacific island countries, according to the 2021 census, and around the World Bank’s threshold for high-income status.
The week-long underwater minerals conference in Rarotonga – where nearly three quarters of Cook Islanders live – has billed itself as “the world’s largest gathering of ocean mineral stakeholders.”
Its sponsors included the Cook Islands Seabed Minerals Authority, or SMA, – set up to regulate mining – and companies with licenses to explore its seabed such as Moana Minerals and CIC Ocean Research.
Civil society organizations, in a letter to the Cook Islands News this week, expressed concerns about how deepsea mining companies have “embedded themselves into the many layers of our society.”
Well publicized examples include funding a charitable trust and sponsoring the country’s main cultural festival and its international cricket team.
Deepsea mining industry representatives also took part in a government delegation to schools last year to raise awareness about seabed minerals, according to a SMA statement.
Juressa Lee, a Greenpeace campaigner, said the activities are a “greenwashing” effort.
Edited by Taejun Kang and Mike Firn.
This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by By Stephen Wright for RFA.
PARC also held its own counter-information event outside each of the buildings themed ‘The People’s Exhibition,’ which was comprised of information boards detailing all of the key arguments the campaign has compiled against the proposed 27 dish radar array which would facilitate the US’s ability to militarily dominate all of space.
Campaigners gave out ‘NO RADAR’ signs for protesters to wear, with a large number of anti-DARC locals attending the PR meetings inside and asking questions:
London PR firm hosts ‘utterly shambolic meeting’ says PARC Against DARC
A PARC spokesperson told the Canary:
Person after person came out from these so called public engagement meetings telling us that they were an “utter shambles,” that they were being told completely different things by different “experts,” and that when pushed on any of the serious questions, they were answered with “we can’t answer that” or “we don’t know yet,” over and over again. Others repeated the mantra that DARC was still at the “conception phase,” leaving us thinking it was strange they could have so much confidence in a proposal they seemed to know very little about at all.
Campaigners recounted:
One local attendee told us that when they’d asked one of the top military officials present if he’d stand next to one of these radars himself, he’d replied, “No, I wouldn’t stand next to one of these radars myself; it’d be like putting my head in a microwave”.
Another official, when quizzed as to why they hadn’t re-sent the invitation leaflets sent out to locals which had got wrong the local place names of Newgale, Middle Mill and Penycwm – calling them “Newgate,” “Middle Hill” and “Penycwn,” – replied, “we could have done, but there wasn’t any point”.
image
A further attendee told campaigners that when he asked if it was true that the construction phase of DARC would involve 120 LGV and HGV lorries per day driving along the Haverfordwest to St David’s road and up the narrow and angular Newgale Hill, the reply he received was:
We don’t know, but I can tell you it will be less than you think.
A local Wales resident asked a question about what the MoD could possibly do about the visual impacts of 27 radars on the landscape that would be unavoidable. They said they were given:
answers that ranged from nothing, to maybe something if forced, to a man who confidently said they’d be growing enormous hedges in an area famous for its lack of anything growing beyond 3 ft in the harsh salt wind.
Campaigners said:
Many attendees told us that the officials asked had said the MoD didn’t even know where the radars were going.
Box-ticking PR, not public engagement in Wales
PARC Against DARC asked a series of technical questions on safety and other issues. The group said that they received “no responses of any meaningful value or reassurance”, adding that:
The London-based PR company Cascade, who had been responsible for running the event, were clearly out of their depth here in Wales. It became very clear very quickly that they were not adhering to National Principles of Public Engagement in Wales. The event was quite visibly a shambles, and it was very apparent this firm were conducting a PR exercise and not the public engagement they were statutorily obliged to carry out.
They continued:
We asked Cascade representatives what other methods of public engagement they were planning to undertake as part of the consultation process in addition to drop-in meetings like these as well as online consultations, and their reply was that they’d “welcome our feedback on what we’d like to see,” and that they “haven’t determined exactly what other engagement they’re doing.” This begs two questions: isn’t this their job in the first place? And why are they asking us to tell them how to do it?
They didn’t even make it clear that only written comments and questions submitted on their feedback forms would be taken into consideration when compiling the results of findings of these events in their report! That’s not public engagement, and already it seems likely to us they are not meeting their statutory obligations. We encourage everyone with concerns to write in and fill out these forms online when they go live, which we were told would be 16 September.
Serious unanswered technical safety questions
Campaigners asked the MoD:
What would be the peak and average power outputs and frequency of the radiation sidelobes, backlobes, and other radiation output besides the main beam of one single DARC transmission radar?
PARC Against DARC said:
We were told that the MOD could not give out this information merely because it was “operational,” and also that it’s even possible this information—without which DARC’s residential safety cannot possibly be properly examined by scientists or the public—will never be released publicly, not even during the planning application phase to Pembrokeshire County Council.
Campaigners said:
Given that there are now nearly 4,000 studies demonstrating health impacts associated with the high levels of radiofrequency radiation DARC produces, we repeat our calls for answers to these serious safety questions, and we haven’t had a single one. It’s a matter of deep concern for the public, and the onus is on them to address these questions they seem clearly uncomfortable about.
New pylons for DARC’s energy supply?
PARC inquired about the electricity supply for DARC, with the question:
Considering the MOD told the National Parks in 2023 that DARC would mean the Barracks may require additional power in the form of either an underground or overground supply, and that an underground supply would likely be inefficient and expensive for the project’s stated timeline, how many pylons will be erected, and where will they be located?
The response received from the MOD’s ‘planning expert’ was that “ultimately they would be dependent on electricity being provided by the statutory providers, the National Grid” and this was not a question they were able to answer.
Similarly, when asked if the high security perimeter fence would be illuminated at night with bright lights which could have a devastating impact on the manx shearwater birds, people were simply being told, over and over again that:
We don’t know yet.
New Newgale Road bypass part of the DARC project?
Amidst widespread local speculation that the new proposed Newgale bypass which is currently being put in front of Pembrokeshire County Council’s planning department for scrutiny was actually being rushed though planning stages because it is an essential piece of infrastructure that DARC would require, PARC also asked if the 120 lorries per day referenced in the MOD’s scoping report would be able to get to the site without the new road in place:
We were told that they “would be able to complete DARC’s construction phase using the existing road infrastructure.”
PARC Against DARC commented:
At PARC we share the community’s doubts that this is realistically possible, and we affirm that the MOD should be fulfilling the legal requirement to submit the new road planning application as part of DARC’s wider planning application due to the quite possible reality that DARC can only go ahead itself if the new road is in place. However, if it really were possible for DARC’s construction phase to be completed using the existing road networks, then imagine for one minute being one of the thousands of local residents and tourists who use the road and getting repeatedly stuck behind the 12 huge lorries per hour which would be driving up and down the tiny and very angular Newgale hill. It would be absolute mayhem.
Elusive and evasive MoD unwilling or unable to answer questions
Moreover, the group noted that:
We asked several other key and extremely important questions, as did so many who attended the events. We couldn’t find anyone who had come out satisfied with the answers they’d received. Many people came out baffled, feeling the consultation was rushed, poorly-informed and confusing. They told us they’d heard contradiction after contradiction, felt that MOD spokespeople came across as evasive and defensive, and some even felt they had been lied to.
If the MOD were really serious about engaging with the local population on DARC as it is obligated to do rather than engaging in a series of box-ticking exercises, perhaps it would have been best off starting by sacking its London PR firm, Cascade which has no connection to the Pembrokeshire and replacing it with a dedicated public engagement organisation from within Wales. Preferably one which knows how, and is committed to, finding out and prioritising what the public really feels and wants in this area.
An avalanche of opposition to DARC
In conclusion, PARC Against DARC noted that:
The temperature of opposition you could see in the room, however, suggests that these problems are going to do very little indeed to dissuade what seems like extraordinarily intense opposition from the local public. This was particularly true in St David’s, with hardly a single person we could see seeming to be there with a kind word to say for the DARC proposal.
We had every confidence that the people of Dewisland would see straight through this one-sided, see-through and frankly contemptuous attempt to steamroll us as a community, and by turning out in such unprecedented numbers, and in effect making the whole day our own, with research and challenges put together by people who actually care about the future and fate of this area, that’s exactly what we did. We are extremely proud to be part of a community who cares so vocally about our landscape, our environment, our economy and its future.
We believe that these PR stunts completely failed in their public engagement obligations and we demand serious answers to all of the serious questions we have raised.
Featured image via the Canary and additional images via PARC Against DARC
The panic button hanging around Marcos’ neck evokes the death threat that pulled him out of the Mexican mountain forests of the Sierra de Manantlán and dragged him to the outskirts of Guadalajara. After years of intimidation, he fled his hometown after the body of his 17-year-old son was found lying on the side of a road. The boy was killed, the lawyers on the case say, because, like his father, he opposed the activities of the Peña Colorada mine, which since 1975 has been squeezing the Sierra in search of iron. Over the decades, the iron mine, Mexico’s largest, has depleted the region’s water reserves, deforested its hills, polluted its air, and created divisions in the community.
At the end of each day, after wandering a city with walls, monuments, and kiosks covered with the faces of missing people, Marcos, who is part of the Indigenous Nahua peoples, takes off his panic button, a direct line to the local police. He rarely sleeps. “My head pounds,” Marcos, whose real name Grist has decided to withhold due to recent death threats against him, said. He thinks of his wife, still at their farm in Ayotitlán, of the fallen fences, of the corn that nobody takes to town, of the coffee beans that rot because there is no one to pluck them, of his remaining children, of the cars that menacingly circle their house. The memory evoked by the device on his bedside table cannot be removed. It is a noose around the neck of a man who feels he’s been sentenced.
Missing person posters line a street in Guadalajara, in the Mexican state of Jalisco, in 2022. Ulises Ruiz/AFP via Getty Images
More than 13 defenders — mostly Indigenous — of the Sierra de Manantlán have been murdered since 1986, according to the nonprofit organization Tskini, which works with Marcos’ community to defend their lands and people. For centuries, the region’s residents have been massacred and disappeared for demanding their right to inhabit their ancestral lands. In recent decades, this task has gotten harder, as extractive industries plundered the mountains.
According to a report released this month from the watchdog group Global Witness, more than two-thirds of the 18 activists killed in Mexico last year were Indigenous, opposed to mining operations along the Jalisco-Colima-Michoacán Pacific coast, where the Sierra de Manantlán is located. The report named Latin America the deadliest region for environmental activists, accounting for 85 percent of the 196 land defenders murdered globally in 2023.
But while public discourse and policy have focused on addressing the most egregious cases of violence against environmental activists — such as assassinations, threats, or forced disappearances — little to no attention has been paid to the invisible traumas and mental health impacts experienced by those who defend the lives of rivers, mountains, ecosystems, animals, and the communities that live within their bounds.
“Around the world, those who oppose the abuse of their homes and lands are met with violence and intimidation,” the Global Witness report reads. “Yet, the full scope of these attacks remains hidden.”
Latin America’s environmental activists live amid a constant threat of violence that permeates their days and bodies and that, like polluted air, tears their insides apart.
An environmental defender in Honduras holds a plastic shell shot at close range toward activists with the Civic Council of Popular and Indigenous Organizations as they protested the Agua Zarca Dam. Giles Clarke via Getty Images
Leaders experience insomnia, anxiety, paranoia, panic attacks, depression, isolation, and suicidal ideation, said Mary Menton, an assistant professor at Heriot-Watt University who works with environmental leaders in Brazil. “Some are unable to speak for days at the peak of a panic attack,” she added. A global study of 110 human rights workers, many of whom simultaneously identify as or work with land defenders, found they suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder, demotivation, conflicts with peers, family problems, alcoholism and drug abuse, and somatization, or the physical expression of psychiatric problems. An earlier online survey found that close to 20 percent of human rights defenders met all the criteria for post-traumatic stress disorder and that nearly 15 percent had symptoms of depression.
In some of the Latin American countries where attacks against environmental defenders are particularly high — Mexico, Brazil, Colombia, and Honduras — governments have created protection mechanisms, providing bodyguards, satellite cell phones, and bulletproof vests, among other methods, to guarantee activists’ physical safety. Support for mental health in these systems, however, is close to nonexistent, said Lourdes Castro, coordinator of the Somos Defensores program, which monitors violence against human rights defenders in Colombia. Instead, psychological care falls to private or nonprofit organizations, which don’t have the resources to meet the growing need — in the rare cases when land defenders are open to, and trusting of, that kind of care. “We talk about the problem, the solution, the hearings, that there is going to be a meeting, but rarely about this,” Marcos said.
“Most [activists] don’t have the money to pay for it. And even if they did and had access to somebody,” said Menton, “then there’s also the resistance to it. Some people, for understandable reasons … they don’t trust very easily.” Added to this are the challenges of getting in and out of their territories — usually located in remote areas — or the unstable connection to the internet and telephone signal for virtual care.
As a response, psychologists, social workers, and lawyers have been building a network of safe houses and temporary shelters throughout Latin America that support the mental health of social leaders and human rights defenders and, increasingly, threatened environmental leaders. These shelters have become one of the few safe spaces to deal with individual and collective grievances, Menton said. Beyond addressing an individual’s mental state, the therapy in these spaces aims to address collective trauma, said Clemencia Correa, a Colombian psychologist exiled in Mexico since 2002 because of her work with civil war victims.
While the need to keep the locations of these places secret makes it impossible to have clear figures regarding their existence, there are at least 10 shelters in Central and South America that make up this growing regional support network. Through theater, art, and handicraft workshops, among other methods, their psychosocial approach is expanding beyond the shelter walls and slowly permeating the work of environmental organizations as well.
“It’s normalized to live under constant stress with mental health issues,” said Adriana Sugey Cadena Salmerón, a lawyer working with Marcos. In 2020, she and her colleague Eduardo Mosqueda founded Tskini, the organization that works with leaders of the town of Ayotitlán and places psychological health as a core priority. “If we start to pay attention, to care for each other, then I think we’ll be stronger,” she said.
Starting in the 1940s, Marcos’ community, the Nahua, watched as logging companies, supported by local and national governments, shaved the mountainous forests and grasslands of their ancestral Sierra de Manantlán. The region’s name comes from the Nahuatl word “amanalli,” which means “place of springs or weeping waters,” and it provides drinking supplies to almost half a million people across western Mexico.
Marcos’ father-in-law and Nahua leader spent decades defending the Sierra de Manantlán and advocating for the recognition of Indigenous lands. He was sent to jail in 1993 after leading one of those protests. Marcos helped organize a rally to demand his immediate release in Telcruz, in the Mexican state of Jalisco. Police broke up the demonstration with gunfire. Two of those bullets found a place to bury themselves: the bodies of Juan Monroy Elías and José Luis, Marcos’ younger brother. He was just 22 years old.
A painting in the offices of the nonprofit Tskini portrays the systematic murder of the Nahua at the beginning of the 20th century. María Paula Rubiano A.
In parallel to this struggle for land recognition, and after decades of pressure from environmental organizations and Indigenous leaders, the loggers eventually left in 1987, when most of the Sierra was declared a protected area. But one major extractive industry remained: the Consorcio Minero Benito Juárez-Peña Colorada iron mine, opened in 1975. The open pit mine, which spans over 96,000 acres, including nearly 3,000 of Nahua collectively owned lands, disfigured the landscape, replacing green mountains with mounds of crumbled stone. According to company numbers, the mine produces 3.6 million tons of iron pellets every year, and 4.1 million tons of iron concentrate, providing 30 percent of Mexico’s industry’s needs. Steel giants ArcelorMittal and Ternium — which own and operate the mine — didn’t respond to multiple requests for comment.
Murders, Menton said, are just one of the violent actions environmental leaders face around the globe. Several organizations report that leaders are increasingly facing threats, intimidation, judicial persecution, smear campaigns, repression, and daily microaggressions. In fact, Global Witness found that criminalization is now the most used tactic to silence environmental defenders. Marcos has been detained three times, the longest one lasting six days, during which he was beaten by police in Guadalajara, he said.
The intersection of all these forms of violence — that happen across time, space, and even generations — creates a feeling of permanent aggression, Menton wrote in 2021. “Living under this constant threat creates what we have called atmospheres of violence or climates of horror,” a slow violence that often goes unnoticed.
From the 1990s onwards, at least eight people throughout the Sierra were killed for their activism. Despite the creation of an ejido — legally recognized and collectively owned lands — in 1963, outsiders have infiltrated decision-making positions that govern the territory. After a controversial election process in 2005, Jesús Michel Prudencio, a Peña Colorada employee, became the ejido’s legal representative, known as the ejidal commissariat, and authorized the expansion of the mine. Subsequently, leaders from the community have been pressured to drop their campaigns against company-friendly candidates, sometimes being murdered for not doing so. Paramilitaries soon began to prowl the Sierra openly, and the criminal syndicate Jalisco New Generation Cartel began opening illegal mines on top of its drug trafficking activities.
An activist overlooks the El Tezoyo quarry, where tezontle and other stones are extracted, in Mexico State, Mexico, in 2018. Pedro Pardo/AFP via Getty Images
For 23 years, Marcos juggled his work as a school teacher with advocacy, sometimes teaching the kids of those in the community working for the Jalisco New Generation Cartel. He led protests demanding payment from the mine for their use of community lands, pleaded with government officials for justice and collective protection, and was the face of lawsuits denouncing outside interference in the governing of Nahua lands. But that balancing act ended on the morning of October 26, 2020, after his eldest, then 17, dropped him off at school. Hours later, Marcos saw his body lying on the side of the road in the community of Rosita. The high school boy had begun to speak up on social media about the shady dealings of the ejidal commissariat. “I made the mistake of talking about the abuses, which obviously bothered him,” Marcos said. A year later, he left Ayotitlán. He arrived in Guadalajara, Mosqueda, his lawyer, said, “like a scared little mouse.”
“I almost lost my mind,” Marcos recalled. He couldn’t sleep. When he slept, he had nightmares. And he feared — and still fears — persecution against him. “I had to talk to priests, psychologists, [it was] hard. I am getting over it, but very little … I walk around all day with problems, the feeling that something will happen.”
Two more land defenders have been killed in the Sierra de Mantatlán since 2020. One of them was part of the National Mechanism for the Protection of Human Rights Defenders and Journalists program, which provided physical security measures. The other murder hasn’t been prosecuted. In 2023, Marcos received new threats, and a pick-up van parked outside his home for four hours.
Marcos receives counseling from a psychologist paid for by Tskini, as well as takes medication. He is also in graduate school, studying for his master’s in educational pedagogy. He sees his wife and children every two or three months, when his wallet and safety conditions allow. “Police visit during the day, but at night they leave, and the criminals are still free,” he said. The Jalisco prosecutors’ office investigating his son’s murder declined to comment on an active investigation.
One of the case files that Tskini handles in defense of the Nahua indigenous people of Sierra de Manantlán. María Paula Rubiano A.
Despite its limited resources, Tskini works with a mental health professional who cares for Marcos, the organization’s two lawyers, who also face threats through their work with leaders from Ayotitlán, and a second leader who also had to leave his home and settle in Guadalajara. Without the organization’s support, Marcos could not pay the taxi and bus fare to the appointment, or buy the medications prescribed by the specialist.
Marcos said defenders used to organize to demand the release of their leaders, or they would go as far as Mexico City or Guadalajara to expose abuses. Not anymore. Today, no one wants to sign the police report requesting an investigation into the death of José Isaac Santos Chávez, his colleague assassinated in 2021. No one wants to associate their name with the struggle for the Sierra. “They are afraid,” he said. “They know they’ll be harassed or forced to disappear.”
In Purépecha language, from the central Mexican state of Michoacan, Tskini means “from where something sprouts,” Cadena Salmerón said. In a climate of horror, she said, “we have to be well, we have to be focused, we have to have peace of mind.”
In a humble neighborhood south of Bogotá, Colombia, there is a house so unremarkable that it is easy to walk past. Except for the cat that wanders the nearby rooftops, its residents rarely go out and never after 8 pm. They are discreet, almost as nondescript as the building itself.
There is fierce persecution against those who live there — threatened social and environmental leaders. Military helicopters have overflown previous versions, looking for its inhabitants. Unknown men have entrenched themselves outside. That’s why, every now and then, the residents move and occupy another unassuming building.
Behind the metal door, however, it is anything but bland. In the back, in a colorful mural, a capybara, a jaguar, a snake, and a cup of coffee surround children playing in the sun; two women weave the map of Colombia; flowers, roots, birds, guitars, and flutes sprout from a heart. Photos and posters of assassinated leaders hang on the sky-blue walls of a room that doubles as a music space and library. A faded declaration of human rights hangs on the wall leading to a huge hall in the back.
A mural painted by human rights and environmental activists and their children in the Corporación Claretiana safe house south of Bogotá. María Paula Rubiano A.
Music room and gathering spaces in the Corporación Claretiana safe house south of Bogotá, designed to help residents tackle mental health issues that arise from their activism. Gustavo Torrijos/El Espectador & María Paula Rubiano A.
Inside, the residents — who usually stay for up to three months — sleep in bunk beds, cook and clean for each other, and spend their hours resting, reading, and talking to each other and the therapists in the organization. Some days, they go to the sewing room and work through their traumas by using their hands. Not all days are good: Sometimes someone wakes up screaming at dawn with a panic attack, in which case one of the psychologists rushes to the house to help them through it.
“We’ve seen many generations grow,” said Jaime Absalón León Sepúlveda, founder and director of the Corporación Claretiana Norman Pérez Bello, which runs the home and has been sheltering human rights defenders from all over Colombia since 2003. “At first it was about saving people from being killed and having a safe place where they could breathe, be with their family and begin to grieve.” But he soon realized they needed “therapeutic spaces, collective and individual, to deal with the crises.”
The work in the house south of Bogotá is based, above all, on a branch of psychology born between the bullets of the Central American civil wars in the ’70s and ’80s. Called liberation psychology or psychosocial therapy, it is a therapeutic alternative to traditional clinical work, focusing on conversations and tools like theater, painting, writing, and other artistic endeavors that allow patients to put their individual suffering within a political context. The method later spread throughout Latin America, serving victims of Colombia’s armed conflict; young people in the Brazilian favelas, or informal settlements; relatives of the disappeared; and torture survivors of the Chilean and Argentinian dictatorships.
Soon, centers focused on the mental health of human rights activists and land defenders started cropping up. In 2013, Correa, the Colombian psychologist, founded Aluna, an organization focused on this type of therapy in Mexico, where she’s been living in exile since 2002.
Correa left Colombia after helping to uncover a military intervention, known as “ Operation Genesis,” that had been planned by paramilitaries and the Colombian army to access the fertile lands — perfect for agribusiness — and forests in the Colombian Caribbean, an area known as Urabá and close to the Darien Gap. At first, she recalls, no one was able to tell them what had happened. “People said, ‘We don’t know, the bad guys kicked us out,’” Correa says. “They couldn’t name it.”
Everyone’s sense of identity was shattered, separated from the land they had long called home. Little by little, information started to trickle in: Bodies began appearing on the streets of Turbo, located before the start of the Darien Gap. At least two local officials disappeared. Days before the displacement in 1997, army helicopters dropped bombs over the area. “The monsters are here,” the children had said. The military came to some villages to tell them that if they didn’t leave in three days, they were going to kill them all. Then the paramilitaries came in. They burned down the houses. They dismembered the body of Afro-Colombian leader Marino López Mena in his small village on the banks of the Cacarica River.
“When we retraced these events with people, it was very painful. But being able to name it allowed us to try to understand so that this would not be totally hushed up,” explained Correa. Correa and her colleagues connected the operation to logging interests over the fertile lands of the Urabá region — a fact recognized a decade later by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and, more recently, by Colombia’s Truth Commission. With the allegations came threats to Correa and others. And then, exile.
When she landed in Mexico, Correa immediately contacted environmental and social organizations. She learned that although the country had not suffered decades of bloody civil war like Colombia, since the late 1950s, when guerrilla groups started to appear across the country, the government had waged a low-intensity war that, with the excuse of stopping rebel organizations, attacked government opponents, leftist leaders, students, and rural and Indigenous people. Correa saw how this “dirty war” was based on the same terror tactics used in Colombia: arbitrary detentions, torture, selective assassinations, massacres, and forced disappearances. And, like in Colombia, victims felt guilty, oscillating between apathy and paranoia. Some did not sleep, others lived in fear. A few drank excessively. All were terrified.
Alan Garcia, an environmental defender, survived being shot at close range by the Honduran Military during a protest against the Agua Zarca Dam. The same incident took his father’s life. Giles Clarke / Getty Images
Traditional psychology, developed through carefully manufactured and controlled experiments on college campuses in the United States, did not conceive the depth of these victims’ and activists’ wounds, Correa said. Nor did it know how to heal them. “We rely on communities’ capacities to build resilience, which more than resilience is resistance to keep on living,” León Sepúlveda explained about this line of work.
Correa’s organization, Aluna, instead applies an approach to victim support proposed by Ignacio Martín-Baró in the 1970s. The Spanish psychologist and priest, who graduated from Chicago University, devoted his life to unraveling the impacts of political violence in El Salvador, where a string of military governments and conservative presidents violently repressed any protest against social and economic inequality. Above all, Martín-Baró wanted to find ways to rebuild communities. His “liberation psychology,” as it’s known, states that if the causes of a wound are from an oppressive political and social context, to heal, people and communities should first understand that context and its key players. Then, after facing the impacts of that violence with psychosocial support, victims may shed their trauma and reaffirm themselves as political actors.
This new way of understanding their reality allows them to rebuild themselves personally and collectively, “enabling them not only to discover the roots of what they are, but also the horizon of what they can become,” Martín-Baró wrote in 1985. Under this method, healing is understood as a political act of freedom. Four years later, in 1989, Martín-Baró was assassinated by the Salvadoran army at the Central American University, where he was the head of the psychology department.
After the priest’s assassination, his thinking spread across Latin America. In 1998, the first International Congress of Liberation Psychology was held in Mexico City, then held annually until 2005 (since 2008, it was held every two years until 2016). Professionals from all over the region gathered to exchange ideas, experiences, and techniques. In 2008, Correa joined the gathering to talk about counseling victims of sexual torture. Around that time, León Sepúlveda had opened the doors of the first safe house of the Norman Pérez Bello Corporation, furnished with a couple of armchairs and beds donated by the Roman Catholic Claretian order, which he had abandoned. The earliest residents were victims of Colombia’s internal conflict, but throughout the years, it has hosted LGBTQ+ rights activists, youth advocates protesting the lack of opportunities in cities, victims of state violence and, more recently, environmental defenders.
In practice, psychosocial counseling takes many forms, said Ajax Sanhueza, director of Colectivo Casa, a human and environmental rights advocacy group working with Indigenous leaders in Bolivia since 2008. They worked with women from the Red Nacional de Mujeres en Defensa de la Madre Tierra, or the National Network of Women in Defense of Mother Earth, who decided they wanted to create short videos in which handmade dolls dressed as Bolivian cholas, representative of the threatened Indigenous leaders that voice them, denounce how mining activities threaten the water supplies of many Indigenous tribes, as well as calling for women’s self-care.
An activist protests against a copper project at the Samalayuca mine in Chihuahua state, Mexico, in 2019. David Peinado/NurPhoto via Getty Images
People must understand what has happened to them, on individual, collective, and historical levels, Correa explained. Suppose people don’t understand, for example, that their territory is an attractive place for certain industries or illegal economies. In that case, it is difficult for them to make sense of the terror they experience and take the appropriate steps to protect themselves, she noted.
It’s hard to tell how many organizations have used or currently use this type of therapy in Latin America. Mark Burton, a social psychologist who has studied this trend since its inception, wrote in 2004 that practicing psychologists do not systematize their experiences. Correa said that the lack of academic production is due, in part, to the fact that Latin American universities have not been interested in the practice for more than a decade. Diploma courses and lectures on the subject, such as the Martín-Baró International Seminar at the Javeriana University in Colombia or the diploma course for forcefully disappeared missing persons at the Autonomous Metropolitan University, Cuajimalpa, do not permeate the curriculum of psychology faculties, she said. “There’s a lot of prejudice against talking about a political approach, as though it would take away from the rigor of psychology,” she explained. Correa noted that such a position negates the fact that traditional psychology already carries ideological baggage. “One of Martín-Baró’s missions is the liberation of psychology itself.”
But networks do exist. As violence against environmental leaders in Brazil escalates, “this issue of mental health support and psychotherapy kept coming up again and again and again,” Menton said. Existing protocols are insufficient. “If you’re in the middle of a crisis, the last place you want to be is in a cold hotel room in a city where you don’t know anyone, and you don’t have a support network,” she said. “We were wondering, how do we create spaces to heal? This is all growing under the surface, and the idea of a house was there, like a dream.”
In 2018, after years of ruminating, Menton led the purchase of a property in the Brazilian Amazon with the organization Not1More and the Zé Claudio and Maria Institute. Aluna contributed its expertise by training volunteers in Brazil on psychosocial principles. Casa La Serena, a shelter located in Mexico City, has helped Menton and her colleagues imagine what amenities the house should have so that its inhabitants “feel safe,” she said, “feel that this is a place to breathe, sleep and rest.” So far, at least four adults have stayed in Casa de Respiro, and dozens have participated in workshops on self-care and holistic strategies for dealing with trauma, Menton added.
Jaime Absalón León Sepúlveda, founder and director of the Corporación Claretiana Norman Pérez Bello, at the safe house south of Bogotá. Gustavo Torrijos/El Espectador
At the Corporación Claretiana house south of Bogotá, a sewing workshop has been the main vehicle for providing support, León Sepúlveda said. Residents gather in a small space next to the large mural room every Saturday to talk and sew. “The names [of the activities] here are all about reactivating the possibilities of life. [That space is called] ‘Mending our history, weaving hope,’” León Sepúlveda said. “People talk, there is a catharsis there.”
In 2023, after 20 years in exile, Correa was reunited in Bogotá with León Sepúlveda, whom she had first met when he was young student priest who often gave refuge to rural farmers, Indigenous peoples, and Afro-Colombians fleeing war. Convened by the international organization Bread for the World, about 10 mental health shelters located in Colombia, Mexico, Brazil, Costa Rica, Honduras, and Guatemala are part of an effort, still in its infancy, to relocate the most at-risk leaders throughout the region. Also, Correa said, they are looking to create safe havens in rural areas, as one of the biggest challenges for leaders is adapting to a city lifestyle.
Caring for those who care for their communities and territories is a risky and sometimes traumatic job. León Sepúlveda has been threatened several times, and some of his closest collaborators have been killed. To cope with the burden, the defender plays Andean music with his children and friends, works in the fields, and writes poetry. Like the house’s inhabitants south of Bogotá, he cannot imagine abandoning his mission.
Yuvelis Natalia Morales Blanco, a Colombian environmental advocate, received her first death threat at 19. Now 23, Morales Blanco, the public face of the country’s youth-led fight against fracking, finds herself at a crucial intersection: Not only does she live in the most dangerous country in the world to be an environmental leader, but also, according to a 2021 global survey, she belongs to an age group disproportionately affected by the psychological burdens of the climate crisis — a crisis that, in turn, will hit rural communities in the Global South like hers the hardest.
Colombia has been embroiled in a fierce debate over the future of fossil fuel extraction, specifically whether to utilize fracking or hydraulic fracturing, the process of injecting a high-pressure liquid into rocks to extract oil or gas. In 2019, then-President Iván Duque announced four pilot projects to determine fracking’s viability on a large scale — two of which were slated for Morales Blanco’s hometown, Puerto Wilches, a small community in the country’s northeast corner on the banks of the Magdalena River. Attempts to ban the practice have failed in Congress, and although the projects are at a temporary standstill, they could restart if political winds shift in the 2026 presidential election.
In an interview, Morales Blanco, the daughter of a fisherman, details her fight to stop fracking in Puerto Wilches and nationwide, her struggles with mental health following years of persistent threats and violence, and the lack of recognition and institutional support available to environmental leaders.
This first-hand account includes graphic references to violence and self-harm. The interview has been edited for length and clarity.
In 2019, a group of local kids, college students, came and invited [my friends and me] to a meeting. In the eyes of everyone else in town, they were social outcasts. A community leader told me, “Yuve, don’t go. Think about your mother… it’s dangerous.”
I didn’t go, but I saw pictures of the event and they had signs that read, “Say No to Fracking.” Fracking? I had no idea. Then, my Facebook homepage started filling with stuff about it and a group called Fracking Free Colombia Alliance started calling for meetings. I started going because I wanted to understand. It touched on everything I’ve always cared about — protecting our biodiversity, our river, and our town.
We were leaving after the second or third meeting, and a man and woman passed by. They saw we were really happy, full of energy, and they told us, “You’re gonna get yourselves killed.” Our mindset changed. It wasn’t a playful thing anymore. I’m from a town where people are killed, and they tally the numbers. The idea of us being little heroes [by being activists, by stopping fracking] crumbled from then on.
Doing this work, I discovered abilities in myself that I didn’t know I had — leadership, instant planning, being resourceful. Things that start to awaken in you, I guess, and I said, “This is it.” That’s how Agua Wil, the youth movement against fracking in Puerto Wilches, was born.
We started doing door-to-door promotion, going to all the neighborhoods, and talking to everyone. It was two weeks of almost no sleep. There was never a moment of sadness because there was a very beautiful sentiment, as if of fraternity, very “veintejulístico” [a reference to Colombia’s independence day on July 20], very of “this homeland that is ours!”
Demonstrators protest the use of fracking during an Earth Day event in Bogota, Colombia in 2022. Juancho Torres/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images
The mayor started to call us for meetings. Then the ombudsman asked us what we were doing and called us “ troublemakers.” Rallies began to take place at Ecopetrol, the state oil company proposing the fracking project. At first, I kept my parents out of it, but one time, my mom told me, “You’re not going to these things anymore. I don’t want you to get killed.”
Because of this, we thought, “No one’s gonna come to the march.” Who would walk with someone tagged a “guerrilla rebel” in a paramilitary town? But the day came, and as I’m arriving, the bike is turning onto the park, I see a crowd. Tears started streaming down my face. We were just kids who opposed Ecopetrol and ExxonMobil.
The parade was immense. People came from all over — from cities like Bucaramanga and Barrancabermeja, from universities, those against fracking in the mountain town of Cajamarca in the páramo, and those who opposed it in the nearby town of San Martín. National and international media were there. It was December, so we transformed Christmas carols into protest songs. It was the innocent beginning.
On December 24, at midnight, the government and Ecopetrol still signed the contracts for the fracking pilot projects. It was such a downfall. In Congress, they realized what had happened and we got an email that said, “Dr. Yuvelis, you’re invited to join the public hearing on fracking.” My friends from Agua Wil told me, “You’re the one who has to do it. People identify with you, and you speak so beautifully.”
The hearing was January 29, 2021. I was nervous. There is no internet at my house, so I went to a friend’s. I had such a crappy connection that I couldn’t turn on the camera. They introduced me as “Dr. Yuvelis Natalia…” and the first thing I said was, “First of all, I’m not a doctor” — I went in with irreverence from minute-one — and I started talking. I said that even though we [Puerto Wilches] had been an oil-producing town for more than 70 years, we did not have a quality education system, we did not have a decent hospital. Public safety was nonexistent. We were a town bringing wealth to an entire nation that turned a blind eye to us. Then, in the end, I said: “Centuries ago, you came, you traded us a mirror, and we gave you all the wealth. Today, that gold is water, and we are not going to give it up for little mirrors.” For better or for worse, everybody started to talk about it — they had never had this type of testimony from Wilches, much less from a woman, much less from a young woman, much less from a Black woman.
Threats began that same day.
At night, around nine or 10, I was at home watching TV and eating something. My mom was at work. It was only my little sister and me. I lived on a main street, so there was always a lot of traffic. I heard a motorcycle stop in front of our home. I was sitting on a rocking chair with my legs up, when suddenly I saw a man standing next to me. I stood up instantly. My hair was super long, and he stroked it and said, “You’re very pretty. It would be a shame if something were to happen to you. Stop fucking around with that fracking stuff because we will kill you.”
It happened in the blink of an eye, but to me, it lasted for hours. I felt very abused. They had touched me, they had invaded my space, they had entered my house.
After I made sure my sister was okay, I locked the front door. I laid her down next to me. I didn’t sleep that night. When dawn broke, I started crying. I wrote Héctor, a member of the Alliance and part of a human rights organization called Credhos. He said, “Tell the rest of the group.” They said, “Go to Barrancabermeja [the nearest city], and file a police report.”
Yuvelis Natalia Morales Blanco speaks during a 2021 press conference in Bogota held by 52 members of Congress. The legislators announced their support for a new law banning fracking in Colombia. Sebastian Barros/NurPhoto
My mom asked where I was going. I never told her. When I arrived at Credhos (Corporación Regional Para La Defensa De Los Derechos Humanos), the first thing Iván, its president, did was to hold me. He said, “Everything will be alright.” It was as if I had a brooch, and it had been unfastened. I started crying. The tears just came out. I said nothing. They gave me water. They hugged me. I said I was going back to Wilches. “Stay. What are you looking for there?,” they asked. “If you leave, we won’t be able to protect you. You’ll be alone.” I was like, “I don’t care.”
Violence against us got worse.
They would call me, telling me to stop talking about fracking. But it wasn’t just me, they also called the others.
One time, someone was about to hand me a soda and made a gun sign to me.
They would go to my house.
I was on a motorcycle with a friend, and they would chase us.
Another day, we were checking the locations for the fracking pilot projects when a white pickup truck without license plates passed by us. They told us, “They are going to kill you and only vultures will find you.”
A friend of mine got married. At the wedding, she told me, “Yuvelis, we didn’t invite those guys over there. I thought they were with you because they have been looking at you for a while.”
The Yuvelis I had been before went to shit because I became very fearful. I could no longer go out. I didn’t even know who I was amidst the fear of persecution and the looming threat that I was going to be killed when I had just turned 20. I started to get an itch, a scratch. My skin started to become blotchy. My period also changed, suddenly I would have hemorrhages.
On top of everything, my mom didn’t know about any of it. She found out when someone told her, “I heard your daughter is under death threat.” My mother said to me, “Yuvelis, is it true?” She started crying. I told her, “Yes, mommy.” And she said, “You see, Yuvelis, I told you.” That was the saddest thing: I felt guilty, even though I was the victim. She told me, “You are not going to stay here because, at some point, they will kill you and kill all of us.”
The Alliance bought me a bus ticket, and I went to Bogotá, the capital of Colombia. The ticket did not even have my name on it.
A friend offered me shelter in La Perseverancia neighborhood. He told me, “Just take a cab and go to this address.” A cab? In Wilches, you just take a motorcycle or you walk. I was so scared, I didn’t know where I was. I was terribly cold. I didn’t own any cold-weather clothes. I arrived at dawn, and he hugged me. I didn’t talk. He gave me a ruana [a cold-weather poncho] and laid me down in a sleeping bag on a sofa. I fell asleep.
I felt defeated. For me, depression and anxiety concentrate on my fingertips. I started tearing the skin off my fingers. It was a time of my life marked by extremes: I wouldn’t cry at all, and then I would cry a lot. I started eating like an animal, then I wouldn’t eat at all. I got COVID. I fought for life, but for the lives of others, not my own.
When I was hospitalized, it was a reality check: I realized people were lying on the ground, cold, without blankets, crowded together [in the hospital corridors]. I said, “I’m not coming back here.”
A network of people willing to be there formed around me. I was very cared for, very supported, very understood in the midst of the crying, the screaming, the silences, and the sudden uncontrollable urge to talk. They were willing to sit down and watch me cry, to cook for me. People who had no clue how to dance organized dancing parties because they knew I loved it. Whatever it took to spark a light in me.
Despite all the trauma and the psychological shock I was experiencing, there was something I never stopped doing, and it saved my life: Talking. I felt the need to tell the world that their extractive realities were costing me my life. I started saying that fighting for life in Colombia takes away your own. Soon, there were people who began sharing with me about their own struggles seeking help.
Little by little, in 2021, I returned to Wilches. I realized all my friends had moved on [with their lives], but the life I had built wasn’t mine anymore, it belonged to the anti-fracking movement, to the public scorn, to everyone but me.
We never stopped working. The government was increasingly saying, “We will do fracking — and that’s it.” We talked back, “You’ll have to kill us then.” In January 2022, the dates of the ANLA [National Environmental Licensing Agency] visits to grant the environmental permits to the pilot projects were announced. We started to organize like crazy.
One day, before an important meeting at the city council, two guys with military garb came to my house and told me: “You already know: We are going to kill you.”
I became a rock. I had built within me a figure that had fractured into two sides: the militant and the personal. My high-functioning part has always been the militant. She was always there, committed. Everyone was expecting me to say, “I don’t want to be here anymore.” But I never did; I kept thinking about how I left running the year before.
But it was all a lie. Inside, I was dead, wanting the Earth to swallow me and spit me somewhere else.
One night, we went to dinner with the Unión Sindical Obrera (National Labor Union). They told me, “We are not famous for being stubborn and waiting to be killed. We are famous because when it’s our turn to leave, we leave and continue fighting from somewhere else.” With that came the proposal to become part of an organization with a collective security scheme because Agua Wil was never given one by the government.
One day, I was going home to get some clothes for a hearing. All of a sudden, the bodyguards come into my home, grab my arm, and throw me into our van. We’re on the corner when my mom calls and said, “Natalia, where are you? Two armed men just came in here asking for you.”
The bodyguards told me to curl up and they started putting on my bulletproof vest. They started calling the police, but the Wilches police never answered. We were alone. We started to go in circles around town, trying to shake them off. At one point, I thought: I hope they kill us quickly. I hope they shoot me in the head because I don’t want to suffer. That thought still haunts me. I just wanted everything to stop. I wanted those around me to stop being afraid and escaping whenever they were around me. I wanted to stop putting other lives at risk.
After that, the Alliance talked to the French Embassy. They told me, “You do not have a security scheme. Your house is made of wood planks. The government did nothing, and is not going to do anything, because the president wants fracking to be done, and today you stand against fracking in Colombia. They are going to kill you. You are leaving. You are going to France.”
Yuvelis Natalia Morales Blanco, 23, in her hometown of Puerto Wilches. Jose Vargas/El Espectador
We left the next morning at about 4 a.m.; it was still dark. The bodyguards went into the airport with weapons and did not leave me alone until I got on the plane to Bogotá. On the plane, I was received by other security escorts and in Bogotá, by the embassy escorts. They took me to a meeting with the French ambassador to Colombia, and he told me, “We admire you, we’ll protect you, and you’ll have everything in France, so don’t worry.”
We landed, and everything looked inhospitable. There was no sun. A bunch of people were waiting for me with signs with my name on them. Leaving the airport, they were talking to me, all excited. And I just looked out the window at all the dead trees. They asked, “Are you happy?” And I said, “No.” I didn’t talk to them at all. And they understood. I just wanted to rest.
All that year was like a fog. It was the golden dream: You have an apartment, you have a scholarship, you can travel to other countries, but I felt misunderstood — because of the language and because of everything I had gone through to get there. I had no one to talk to. I began to demand psychological counseling because I was in very bad shape. So they looked for someone, but that person spoke Portuguese, not Spanish. He didn’t understand anything; it was awful and only made me feel worse. I survived because I found others in exile. But I always said I wanted to go back, no matter how, I wanted to go back home. I didn’t have any closure. My work was unfinished, and because of that, I was also unfinished. I didn’t have the chance to say goodbye to my mom, my sisters and brothers, or my dad. I didn’t have the chance to say goodbye to the river. My life wasn’t mine anymore, and I wanted it to be. I came back to Colombia in December 2022.
Breaking down so many times has helped me rebuild myself in a thousand ways. I decided to take a stand, to be strong, but also to have a soft heart, which is sometimes what many militants lose: empathy towards their own lives.
I decided that the militant half and the other half should be one. I am Yuvelis Natalia Morales Blanco, the militant against fracking who feels a lot, suffers a lot, loves a lot, and can stand for something — and for herself.
Editor’s note: If you or someone you know may be considering suicide, contact the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline by calling or texting 9-8-8, or the Crisis Text Line by texting HOME to 741741.
This Monday at the Gaslit Nation political salon, a crucial announcement was made: Rise and Resist is staging a protest outside the New York Times building this Wednesday, September 18th, at 9am. Their mission? To demand that the New York Times stop normalizing Trump’s dangerous rhetoric and fascist threat to our democracy.
Trump’s blatant lies and hate speech not only fuel political violence, but have also led to two assassination attempts against him. His dangerous behavior is a crisis, and the Times’ failure to address this seriously contributes to the problem. They are gaslighting the public by treating these issues as normal.
Andrea will join the protest, and encourages Gaslit Nation listeners to come out and support this important cause. Look for us on the corner of 8th Avenue and 42nd Street.
Also, a big thank you to everyone who attended the launch of In the Shadow of Stalin at the Ukrainian Institute of America. The event was magical! Stay tuned for the audio and the video on Patreon this Saturday at 3pm ET for all who follow the show there, featuring a special live chat on Patreon for those watching the video at the same time. More exciting Gaslit Nation events are coming soon!
On September 24 at 12:00 PM ET: Join our virtual live taping with David Pepper, author of Saving Democracy. Join us as David discusses his new art project based on Project 2025.
Join a community of listeners, get invites to exclusive events, become a member of our Victory chat, get bonus shows, all shows ad free, and more, by subscribing at Patreon.com/Gaslit! Discounted annual memberships available! Thank you to everyone who supports the show – we could not make Gaslit Nation without you!
Have you RSVP’ed to our next phonebank with Indivisible on Thursday September 17th? https://www.mobilize.us/indivisible/event/628701/
This content originally appeared on Gaslit Nation and was authored by Andrea Chalupa.
Richard Barnard, Palestine Action co-founder, is due for his first court appearance (a plea hearing) at Westminster Magistrates Court on Wednesday 18 September from 10am for three charges relating to two speeches.
Palestine Action in court
Cops first arrested Barnard for the accusations he has been charged on 9 November 2023.
This was four days before he was due to begin trial at Snaresbrook Crown Court as part of Palestine Action’s ‘Elbit Eight’. During that trial, the state accused him of several offences. The court acquitted him of three of them, including a charge of encouraging criminal damage.
Authorities previously stopped him under Schedule 7 counter-terrorism powers in November 2020 alongside fellow activist Huda Ammori.
Palestine Action co-founder Barnard’s charges this time were authorised by the Director of Public Prosecutions, Stephen Parkinson. They are as follows:
On 8 October 2023 Richard Loxton Barnard did an act capable of encouraging the commission of an offence, namely criminal damage, and intended to encourage its commission contrary to section 44 Serious Crime Act 2007.
On 8 October 2023, Richard Loxton Barnard expressed an opinion or belief that was supportive of a proscribed organisation, namely Hamas, being reckless as to whether it encouraged support of that organisation contrary to section 12(1A) of the Terrorism Act 2000.
On 11 October 2023 Richard Loxton Barnard did an act capable of encouraging the commission of an offence, namely criminal damage, and intended to encourage its commission contrary to section 44 Serious Crime Act 2007.
His charges relate to speeches during a Manchester protest on 8 October and in Bradford on 11 October. The decision to charge came after 10 activists from Palestine Action were detained without charge for seven days under the Terrorism Act, following an action which cost Israel’s biggest weapons producer, Elbit Systems, over £1million in damages.
Palestine Action supporters are expected to gather outside the court hearing.
In Bradford Crown Court, a two-week trial ended against four Palestine Action activists, with the jury on Friday 13 September refusing to convict them of charges of ‘criminal damage’ after they shut down an Israel-supplying military electronics firm in April 2024.
Palestine Action: a jury concurs, kind of
The jury had been out for deliberations since 2:30pm on 11 September, after the trial commenced on 3 September. The Palestine Action activists will now face a retrial.
The ‘Shipley Four’ occupied the premises of ‘Teledyne Defence and Space’, at Airedale House, Shipley, for over 14 hours on 2 April, six months into Israel’s genocide in Gaza, to prevent its manufacture of weapons parts used for war crimes.
For the duration of the occupation, Palestine Action activists used sledgehammers to break apart the site – smashing the roof, windows, and the interior premises – with damage of £571,383 alleged in Court:
This damage was purposeful; intended to halt Teledyne Shipley’s manufacture of missile parts for Israel’s war machine. The site, between 2009 and 2014, was granted at least 86 licenses for the export of weapons to Israel – mostly for ‘ML11’-category military electronics equipment, and ‘ML4’ category explosive weapons, munitions, or parts therefor.
Teledyne: complicit in, and profiting from, Israel’s genocide
After 2014, the company’s sales and licensing was handled by the parent company ‘Teledyne UK’, which continued to export vast quantities of ML4 and ML11 weapons to Israel as part of its 48 export licenses granted between 2014 and 2020.
The American company Teledyne has a $5.6bn yearly turnover and is, along with its subsidiary ev2, the largest exporter (by volume of licenses granted) of weaponry from Britain to Israel. A significant proportion of the company’s almost 200 export licenses for weapons and weapons parts to the US, 2009-2020, will also form into finished products ultimately exported to Israel.
Teledyne Defence and Space, Shipley, manufactures key components for missile systems – specifically missile filters – which will comprise the ML4 exports made yearly from the site. Teledyne Defence and Space boasts of its involvement with missile products procured by Israel including the AGM-Harpoon, AIM-120 AMRAAM, and AGM-114 Hellfire missiles deployed by Israel against Gaza – the latter reportedly being used to strike Al-Shifa hospital.
Teledyne Defence and Space also produces components for the American’s Tomahawk and Patriot missiles, deployed by US forces against Yemen. The Shipley site also produces parts, including filters and multi-function assemblies, for UAVs (drones) and aircraft, along with radar systems including the AN/APG-81 (AESA) type fitted in Lockheed Martin F-35 Fighter jets
A necessary action
Following their arrest, one of the four Palestine Action activists was remanded in prison for one month, and another remanded for three months.
While one of the four self-represented throughout the trial, the other three opted to dismiss their counsel following the conclusion of evidence – and the judge’s decision to deny them all of their defences.
While making closing speeches, the activists reminded jurors of their right to acquit according to their conscience. When the judge was asked for clarification on this by the jury, she told the jury that no one is able to direct the jury to convict but they must follow the legal directions which rule out any lawful excuse for the action taken.
Subsequently, they refused to return a verdict. Despite the lack of public interest in pursuing the prosecution, a retrial is expected to happen in February 2026.
In their evidence, the Palestine Action activists spoke of the necessity of taking action against Israel’s crimes, and particularly in Britain – which fostered the Zionist project and continues to arm it. One activist, Ruby Hamill, 20, stated:
This country has had a hand in these crimes from the beginning and it is therefore our duty to stop them. We acted on the 2nd April out of necessity. Lives and property were on the line. We acted in defence of both, not to the contrary as accused. And in doing so we gave hope.
I hope to continue to be a part of a movement that was giving people in such depraved circumstances a bit of hope, hope that the self-proclaiming democracies would listen to the citizens, despite not listening to the millions weekly on the streets, choosing to demonise us instead. Hope that systems of oppression and companies like Teledyne would suffer financially and fall.
Palestine Action: it could be any of us
A second Palestine Action activist testified that they were motivated to act upon seeing images of a boy in Gaza, carrying parts of his brothers’ corpse in his backpack – with the brother dismembered by missiles possibly contributed to by Teledyne.
This recalled, for them, how their family members were slaughtered as children by Japanese forces:
I know that the families targeted by the missiles Teledyne Defence and Space are involved with could have looked like mine and their Grandchildren could be standing in my very place.
Another Palestine Action activist, Syed Najim Shah, also commented on these motivations, having seen unbearable reports of the torture of children – which is something he has seen from Israel dating back decades, including to the murder of children in Sabra and Shatila exactly 42 years ago.
Another activist, Daniel Jones, commented that at the time of the action, Al-Shifa hospital in Gaza was under siege – babies lying dead in incubators as a result. The damage caused to Teledyne, Shipley, intended to halt the flow of arms to Israel and protect human life.
The CPS has said it will re-try the case against the Palestine Action activists.
Featured image and additional images via Palestine Action
The following is a message from Stop The War Coalition
Israel’s genocide in Gaza could engulf the entire Middle East and the war in Ukraine is currently at a precipice. There is a very real danger of direct war between NATO and Russia, while increasing militarisation in the Pacific has placed the region on high alert.
The new Labour Party government has no plans to move away from the disastrous foreign policy of recent decades, indeed it has pledged to increase military spending to unprecedented levels.
Starmer’s Labour has also enabled the far right and the rise in Islamophobia through its deeply racist election campaign and subsequent smearing of pro-Gaza Muslim MPs. It continues to show utter indifference to the suffering of Palestinians and to threaten the civil liberties of those who protest to demand a more peaceful and just world.
Help us campaign to break with the cycle of violence, hate, militarism and forever wars and to fight for a society based on justice, solidarity and peace.
This past year Stop the War Coalition has helped organise an unprecedented number of demonstrations and played a vital role in the Palestine movement. We have continued to campaign against the war in Ukraine and increased military spending. But campaigning requires money and we have little.
We urgently need to expand our office and output and have set our appeal target at an ambitious £60,000. Please donate generously and help fund the fight for peace.
Overnight on Thursday 12 September, Palestine Action targeted more than ten Barclays sites including branches, call centres, and offices. The bank has been marked with symbols of its complicity in Israel’s genocide of Palestinians.
Palestine Action smashing up banks again
Bank premises from Edinburgh to Kent have had their windows smashed, and covered in blood-red paint, in actions which Palestine Action have vowed will continue until Barclays cease their investments in Elbit Systems – Israel’s largest weapons firm, and Palestine Action’s primary target:
BREAKING: Palestine Action target over 10 Barclays sites across the country, from management centres to local branches.
The bank continues to invest in Israel's biggest weapons producer, Elbit Systems — our primary target. pic.twitter.com/R30hxci9mN
These actions follow those of June 2024, when nearly 20 branches of the arms-investing bank were smashed.
This was Barclays in Edinburgh:
A branch of the bank in Liverpool got similar treatment by Palestine Action:
This was a Barclays in London:
And in Islington:
While this was Manchester:
Confirmed sites targeted by Palestine Action include:
3 Hardman St, Manchester
Royal Tunbridge Wells, TN1 2TB
Islington, London, N1 8EH
Whitechapel, E1 1BJ
Mayfair, W1J 8NL
Hammersmith, W6 9HY
Oxford, OX1 3HB
Edinburgh, EH2 2AN
London, E6 2HW
Edinburgh, EH3 7LU
Liverpool, L7 9PQ
11 months into the genocide in Gaza, in which Elbit plays a central role, Barclays still holds Elbit shares. In fact, it has more than tripled its Elbit shareholdings. Elbit provides 85% of Israel’s military drone fleet and land-based equipment, as well as bombs, missiles and other weaponry, which it markets as “battle-tested” after they are developed during bombardments in occupied Palestine.
Additionally, Barclays holds over £2billion of investments, and underwrite loans worth £6billion, in other firms involved in arming Israel.
Barclays: stop making excuses
When Barclays last saw nationwide resistance, its CEO, CS Venkatakrishnan, claimed that the the bank is “deeply sympathetic about the overall suffering in the region”, but pleaded that Barclays’ property ought to be protected.
Palestine Action stated in response:
Barclays’ investments are contributing to the wholesale destruction of Gaza, the erasure of Palestinian life and property.
These banks choose to invest in manufacturers of genocide. They have evaluated that the continued returns on investment generated by Elbit Systems and Israel’s war machine are worth more than the moral or political cost of dealing in war crimes.
Palestine Action will continue to take action to re-calibrate that cost-benefit analysis: reducing the profitability of any operation doing business with Israel’s arms trade.
Featured image via Neil Terry and additional images via Neil Terry, Milo Chandler, and Palestine Action
Campaign groups have announced the first major protest at this year’s Labour Party conference. It is over Israel’s ongoing genocide in Gaza.
Israel: the genocide continues as IDF kills 40 in safe zone
11 months in and Israel’s genocide in Gaza continues to accelerate. Schools and hospitals are still being continually struck by Israeli attacks and a Lancet study has estimated that the true overall death toll may be as high as 180,000.
Israel struck a declared safe zone in Gaza on Tuesday, in a strike that killed at least 40 people. The strike hit Al-Mawasi in the southern Gaza Strip, which Israel had designated as a “humanitarian zone” early in the war, and prompted condemnations from the region and beyond.
Samar al-Shair, one of tens of thousands of displaced Palestinians who have sought refuge in the coastal area, said the attack came “as we were sleeping in our tents”.
She said the Israeli military had asked Palestinians to go to Al-Mawasi “telling us it was safe. Where is the safety?”. Survivors of the strike scrambled to retrieve belongings from the rubble, including mattresses and clothing.
Civil defence spokesman Mahmud Bassal said people sheltering in the camp in the dunes along the Mediterranean coast had not been warned of the strike, which left “three deep craters”. “There are entire families who disappeared under the sand,” he said.
Widely condemned – but hollow words from the UK
UN chief Antonio Guterres condemned the strike, his spokesman Stephane Dujarric said, adding that “the use of heavy weapons in densely populated areas is unconscionable”.
Turkey said the strike added to Israel’s “list of war crimes”. Egypt denounced “the continuation of Israeli massacres”. Saudi Arabia decried “a new attack in a repeated series of violations by the Israeli war machine”.
Arab League ministers, meeting in Cairo, decided to “formally intervene” in support of an International Court of Justice case brought by South Africa that accused Israel of “genocidal acts” in Gaza.
British foreign secretary David Lammy condemned “the shocking deaths”, which he said showed “how desperately needed” a Gaza ceasefire was. However, Despite a change of government, the British state is still supporting these war crimes taking place on a daily basis.
Protest at the Labour Party conference
Labour’s decision to reinstate funding for UNWRA and the abandonment of a proposal to block the ICC’s warrants against Netanyahu are victories for the anti-war movement. Now, it will call on them to suspend all arms sales to the apartheid Israeli state.
Labour’s decision to suspend some arms sales to Israel is an admission of guilt on behalf of the British government. However, the suspension of just 30 licences is a tiny fraction of the number Britain issues.
So, a rally has been organised by various groups including Palestine Solidarity Campaign, Stop the Wat Coalition, Friends of Al Aqsa, and CND.
Join the protest in Liverpool on 21 September at Labour Party Conference. It will be calling on our government to push for a permanent ceasefire in Gaza and immediately end its support for apartheid Israel’s genocide.
There are coaches organised from around the country. Make sure you’re on one so you can make your demands to Starmer and Lammy as loud as possible.
New York, September 10, 2024—The Committee to Protect Journalists calls for a swift investigation into the September 6 detention and transfer of Azerbaijani journalist Shahla Karim, who was released several hours later.
“In yet another example of the lawlessness and harassment of media in Azerbaijan, journalist Shahla Karim was forcibly removed and transported hundreds of kilometers away from her reporting site to prevent her from covering elections and related protests,” said CPJ’s Europe and Central Asia Program Coordinator Gulnoza Said. “Azerbaijani authorities must quickly identify and hold those to account for detaining Karim and ensure that she gets her journalistic equipment back.”
Karim, a freelance journalist for several independent news outlets, was reporting on opposition candidate Vafa Nagi’s (Nagieva) protest of alleged election fraud in Azerbaijan’s September 1 parliamentary elections when around 10 plainclothes men in surgical masks forcibly detained the journalist, the candidate, and the candidate’s aide in the southeastern city of Neftchala. The three were driven to the capital Baku, around 180 kilometres (110 miles) away, where they were released, according to news reports and Karim, who spoke to CPJ by messaging app. Karim also posted about the incident on Facebook.
Karim told CPJ that she repeatedly identified herself as a journalist, as is audible in video she posted of the incident, and said she believed the men were law enforcement officers because uniformed police at the scene did not intervene. The men said “those were the orders” when Karim asked why she was detained, and the men seemed to be receiving orders by telephone, according to the journalist.
After around four hours, the men dropped them off in a Baku suburb and returned their phones, but kept Karim’s microphone, she said.
In a similar September 2022 incident, Baku police detained journalist Sevinj Sadygova and the wife of jailed journalist Polad Aslanov while the latter was protesting her husband’s imprisonment and released them after driving them outside the city.
Report says governments in global north increasingly using draconian measures while criticising similar tactics in global south
Wealthy, democratic countries in the global north are using harsh, vague and punitive measures to crack down on climate protests at the same time as criticising similar draconian tactics by authorities in the global south, according to a report.
A Climate Rights International report exposes the increasingly heavy-handed treatment of climate activists in Australia, Germany, France, the Netherlands, Sweden, the UK and the US.
Record prison sentences for non violent protest in several countries including the UK, Germany and the US.
Preemptive arrests and detention for those suspected of planning peaceful protests.
Draconian new laws passed to make the vast majority of peaceful protest illegal.
Measures to stop juries hearing about people’s motivation for taking part in protests during court cases, which critics say fundamentally undermines the right to a fair trial.
Mexico City, September 9, 2024—Police beat at least two journalists and arrested two others during a protest for human rights in Xochimilco, a southern borough of Mexico City, on Thursday, September 5, according to members of the media who witnessed the incidents.
“By brutally repressing a social protest and attacking journalists who were simply covering the events, Mexico City authorities once again fail to recognize and protect press freedom, despite years of promises to the contrary,” said Jan-Albert Hootsen, CPJ’s Mexico representative. “If Mexico City wants to uphold its self-proclaimed status as a city that respects human rights, it must immediately take all appropriate steps to guarantee journalists can safely cover protests without fear of police brutality or arrest.”
Civilians, including members of the Otomí Indigenous community, were protesting in support of local human rights activist Hortensia Telésforo on Thursday when a group of unidentified people carrying sticks, knives, and firearms attacked them.
Shortly after the clashes began around 3:30 p.m., local police arrived, deployed tear gas, and then beat and arrested several protesters, according to two journalists who witnessed the events and spoke to CPJ on the condition of anonymity, citing fear of reprisal.
Police arrested Penélope Estefanía Galicia Argumedo, a reporter with community radio station Radio Zapote, and Elizabeth Díaz, a freelance reporter, and detained them for several hours before they were released, according to information provided to CPJ in a Friday meeting by the Fundación por la Libertad de Expresión, a collective of human rights organizations.
CPJ was unable to confirm whether they and the protestors detained would face charges; Mexico City interim mayor Martí Batres said his government does not want anyone arrested during the protests to face trial.
Freelance reporter José Meza and another unnamed journalist reported being beaten by police and suffered minor injuries, the two witnesses told CPJ.
Police confiscated work and personal phones from an attorney for international freedom of expression group Article 19, the organization’s regional director, Leopoldo Maldonado, told CPJ.
CPJ’s several calls to the Mexico City Public Safety Secretariat for comment on the beatings and arrests were unanswered.
Not to do things by halves, Palestine Action started the week as it means to go on: by blockading an Elbit factory – Instro, in Kent – for the majority of the day; once again, disrupting Israel’s genocide supply chain in the process
Activists have used vehicles to obstruct the entrances:
Actionists inside two vehicles blocking one entrance into Kent's Israeli weapons factory, whilst others have taken over all other ways in. pic.twitter.com/VhWXamWwlQ
Whilst this action is taking place, there are 16 Palestine Action political prisoners detained for trying to stop a genocide.
Palestine Action’s ongoing blockade demonstrates the direct action group will not be deterred from it’s goal to shut Elbit down. The site, used to manufacture weapons sights and target acquisition products for the Israeli military was previously entered and dismantled by activists in June.
Palestine Action pledge to continue direct action against Elbit Systems, until the Israeli weapons manufacturer can no longer operate in Britain.
Instro: complicit in Israel’s genocide
The premises, at Sandwich’s ‘Discovery Park’, regularly export ‘ML5’-category weapons sight and target acquisition products to Israel, with at least 50 export licenses for arms sold for ‘military end use’ in Israel approved within a five-year period.
Instro’s weapons products, including XACT th64 and XACT th65 weapons sights, have been delivered in their thousands to the Israeli military for use by “marksmen of both Infantry and Special Operation Forces”, including those conducting ground operations in Gaza. Instro furthermore manufactures target acquisition products fitted to Israeli Skylark drones and to ground vehicles with “hunter-killer capabilities”. All of these products can potentially comprise Instro’s dozens of ‘ML5’ category exports.
Last week’s announcement that the government will continue to permit 90% of Britain’s weapons exports to Israel, necessitates the continuation of action in response to British complicity in the genocide of Palestinians.
Furthermore, Elbit Systems continues to profit from genocide by selling weaponry globally which is marketed as “battle-tested” on the Palestinian people.
Palestine Action: stepping up against Elbit
A Palestine Action spokesperson said:
Despite the ongoing Gaza genocide, Britain has allowed 92% of arms export licenses to continue and given permission for Israeli weapons factories to keep operating across the country. Although our government have failed to take meaningful action, ordinary citizens refuse to be complicit in the mass murder of Palestinians and are stepping up to shut Elbit down.
A Met Police commissioner has been talking to notorious shadowy dark money think tank Policy Exchange. It was over the force’s policing of pro-Palestine protests. Crucially, his comments come as part of the think tank’s new report pushing the Labour Party government to expand the police and court’s anti-protest powers.
Of course, it’s shocking enough that a senior Met police official has loaned the opaquely-funded organisation his voice. What’s worse is that it’s the very think tank at the centre of the authoritarian anti-protest laws the Tories have already put in place and cops have used to repress peaceful protesters.
Policy Exchange: new report calls for more repressive police powers
On Monday 9 September, shady right-wing think tank Policy Exchange published a new alarming report titled:
‘Might is Right?’ The ‘Right to Protest’ in a new era of disruption and confrontation
Naturally, the report ramps up its calls for a further crackdown on peoples’ right to peaceful protest.
In particular, it seeks to influence the new Labour government to adopt more draconian legislation. This includes recommendations to:
More powers under the Public Order Act 2023 to prohibit protest marches.
Replicate the Irish Republic Offences Against the State Act 1939. This would give the police sweeping new powers to forbid “prevention by obstruction or intimidation of any branch of the government of the State from carrying out their functions, duties or powers”.
Mandating police chiefs to implement section 7 of the Public Order Act. As the Canary has previously highlighted, the Met first used this new power to arrest Just Stop Oil protesters marching for less than twenty minutes down Cromwell Road in London.
However, this is a non-exhaustive list of the think tank’s demands.
What’s more, Policy Exchange highlighted Labour’s recent decision to pursue the previous Tory government’s appeal over its unlawful anti-protest laws.
Policy Exchange and the Tory’s anti-protest laws
Of course, we’ve been here before. In 2019, Policy Exchange published a similar report titled “Extremism Rebellion”. Notably, as the name suggests, it did this in response to the 2018 launch of Extinction Rebellion.
In June 2023, then prime minister Rishi Sunak boasted that the think tank had helped draft its anti-protest legislation.
In fact, an openDemocracy investigation had suggested that whole sections of the Police, Crime, Sentencing, and Courts Act had been:
directly inspired by the Policy Exchange report.
Specifically, it had called for the government to “urgently” reform protest laws:
in order to strengthen the ability of police to place restrictions on planned protest and deal more effectively with mass law-breaking tactics.
Of course, then home secretary Priti Patel wasn’t shy about the fact it had designed the new police powers to directly tackle climate protesters.
And it was little wonder Policy Exchange had a hand in this.
This is because the think tank has a sprawling network of ties with the fossil fuel industry. Not least among these is the fact that big oil has funded it. While the think tank is tight-lipped about the sources of its funding, previous investigations have revealed US fossil fuel major ExxonMobil has bankrolled Policy Exchange to the tune of $3.5m. However, this is likely just the tip of the rapidly melting iceberg.
Since the government passed the draconian police powers in law, cops and the courts have enacted heavy, repressive arrests and sentences on thousands of peaceful protesters.
The Canary has reported on many Extinction Rebellion and Just Stop Oil protesters the state has targeted under these laws. We also reported on Extinction Rebellion pushing back against Policy Exchange – protesting directly outside its office.
Met Police in bed with Policy Exchange
We can’t possibly think why Policy Exchange is now turning its attention to Palestine protesters:
SHOCK NEWS: Today @Policy_Exchange, another ‘think tank’ sponsored by Big Oil and the arms industry, calls for the courts to get tougher on those exposing the violence and lies of Big Oil and the arms industryhttps://t.co/H3KNTV1aLO
Naturally, the corporate media has also lapped up the new report. Right-wing rags like the Daily Mail and the Telegraph have uncritically platformed the think tank’s report. Most significantly, they have honed in on Met assistant commissioner Matt Twist’s input to this.
Met Police admits making mistakes policing pro-Palestine protests
Meanwhile, the Daily Mailpublished under a similar line:
Met Police admits ‘errors were made’ in tackling anti-Israel demonstrators – amid calls for protest laws to be ‘rebalanced’ in favour of the public
Specifically, these detailed assistant Met commissioner Matt Twist’s interview with the right-wing think tank. Notably, the two outlets focused on Twist’s suggestion that the police did not “move quickly to make arrests” at Palestine marches.
The Network for Police Monitoring (Netpol) noted that it’s perfectly on brand for Twist:
The rightwing Policy Exchange publishes another batshit crazy report demanding an even greater crackdown on protests, backed by some of the most illiberal senior police officers of recent times. Unsurprisingly they want more restrictions and demonstrations banned #DefendDissent
In February for instance, the assistant commissioner had branded calls to free Palestine as antisemitic:
For genuine anti-racists (so not the Met), increasing antisemitism in Britain is a cause for alarm. Figures quoted today – that include the words “Free Palestine” as an example of attacks on Jewish people – should nevertheless lead to questions about the scope of this data https://t.co/IOKnIKPy6P
As one poster on X highlighted, Policy Exchange is trying to drive a wedge between the general public and protesters. Crucially, the user underscored that protesters ARE members of the public, whose rights the police is meant to protect:
Policy Exchange would have us believe that protesters and the public are two seperate species. Protesters ARE the public. Their rights are our rights. The framing of us against them is nonsensical when all there is, is us. https://t.co/TqPlpXBofT
Of course, this hasn’t stopped the Met and other police forces tyrannically curtailing these rights. The forces attempts to impose major restrictions on the Palestine Solidarity Campaign march in London on Saturday 7 September is a glaring example of this.
Now, Policy Exchange, with the backing of a senior Met commissioner and other former Met officials, want to expand the force’s ability to do this even further.
Distinctly anti-democratic at best
At the end of the day, Met officials that claim to serve the public should be going nowhere near the vested, clandestine interests of a right-wing think tank. However, it also comes as little surprise.
Crucially, this is because we should be under no illusion that the police actually exist to serve the public. The Met – and the police in general – have always been a tool of the racist, capitalist state.
Despite that, this incident of Met collaboration with a dark money think tank shows this doesn’t solely involve shielding the rich and powerful from public dissent. It also means actively advancing their corporate capitalist interests – and using their public position to do it.
Needless to say, if Policy Exchange has its way, the Met will step up its authoritarian clamp down on peoples’ right to protest even more. Already, it’s clear climate activists and Palestine protesters will be first in the firing line.
Four Just Stop Oil supporters have been sentenced to prison for up to three years, while one has been given a suspended sentence. The five took action in August 2022, demanding the UK government immediately halts all licensing and consents for new fossil fuel exploration and extraction.
Just Stop Oil: five sentenced, four sent to jail
Sam Johnson, Larch Maxey, Joe Howlett, Christopher Bennett, and Autumn Wharrie appeared before Judge Graham in Basildon Crown Court on Friday 6 September, after they were found guilty in March of ‘conspiracy to cause a public nuisance’, a statutory offence under the new Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act 2022.
Sam Johnson and Christopher Bennett were sentenced to 18 months, Larch Maxey was sentenced to three years and Joe Howlett was sentenced to 15 months, whilst Autumn Wharrie received a suspended sentence.
Just Stop Oil had taken action by occupying tunnels dug under the road leading to the Navigator Oil Terminal in Thurrock, Essex. This occurred simultaneously with three other tunnelling actions in Essex and Warwickshire, as well as occupations of oil trucks and terminals overground. These combined efforts massively reduced the flow of oil in the UK at the time.
Xavier Trimmer-Gonzalez took action with the group, but died in 2023 after taking his own life whilst under strict curfew and being subject to invasive electronic monitoring. Xavi spent time in prison on remand following his actions with Insulate Britain and Just Stop Oil. Friends of Xavi reported that his isolation due to strict bail conditions and the threat of returning to prison was a major factor in the deterioration of his mental health.
A Just Stop Oil spokesperson said:
Xavi was loved for his bright spirit, his strength, his humour and wit. Those who had the joy of knowing him and sharing his life, continue to feel his loss every day. Xavi took action with a sense of service and love. He demanded a future worth living and for that the state sent him, with many others, to prison. If the judiciary continues to imprison and penalise good, courageous people, then the mental burden visited on our young people will only increase.
The group join 21 other Just Stop Oil political prisoners, including the Whole Truth Five who were sentenced to 4-5 years in prison in June at Southwark Crown Court, in the longest ever sentences handed out for nonviolent climate action.
Punished for taking action over the climate crisis
Sam Johnson said before the sentencing:
Two years ago, I took part in an action digging tunnels to block the Navigator oil terminal. I did this to protect my nephew Alex, who was six at the time. He’s now eight years old, and in these past two years, we’ve watched climate breakdown unfold in real time.
The reality is so terrifying it’s almost unimaginable – and that’s part of the problem. Make no mistake: this crisis will affect every single human alive today, and far sooner than most people think.
It’s time to ask ourselves: What do we truly hold dear? What are we willing to fight for? Because we could lose it all.
The group remained in the 52-foot tunnel for 13 days. At the time, Chief Constable of Essex Police, BJ Harrington, recognised in a statement that the climate crisis is a “serious concern”, however, Essex police put the lives of the action takers and motorists at risk by opening the roads over the tunnel.
At the time, action taker Joe Howlett said:
The climate crisis is caused by a very small minority of people and it’s those same people who are currently profiteering from the cost of living crisis. That’s why I’ve spent the last ten days living in a tunnel under a road leading to the Navigator oil terminal in Essex.
UK prisons overflowing – but let’s jail Just Stop Oil
Today’s sentencing comes as the Copernicus Climate Change Service has confirmed that Summer 2024 was the Earth’s hottest on record. August was the 13th month in a 14-month period where the global average temperature exceeded 1.5C above pre-industrial levels.
It is increasingly likely that 2024 will be the hottest year on record globally, according to the EU’s climate service. The United Nations’ weather and climate agency chief, Celeste Saulo, of the World Meteorological Organisation, warned that spiralling temperatures should trigger a global “red alert.”
Meanwhile, the prison population has reached a new record high. Official figures showed there were 88,521 people imprisoned on Friday, 171 more than the previous record set at the end of last week. Ministers are considering sending prisoners to serve sentences in Estonia in order to address the capacity problem faced by British prisons- where just over 1,000 spaces are thought to be left in England and Wales.
62,830 people have already signed Just Stop Oil’s petition calling for an end to the imprisonment of truth tellers. You can join them here.
The following article is a comment piece from Palestine Solidarity Campaign and its coalition partners
In a great victory for the Palestine movement, the Met Police have withdrawn all the major restrictions on tomorrow’s march. The coalition that organise the national demonstrations for Palestine have released the following statement. Please share it on social media below and make sure you are there on Saturday. Bring your friends, family and neighbours. Free Palestine. Stop arming Israel.
With less than 24 hours to go, the Met Police has dropped its attempt to frustrate our national march for Palestine.
Tomorrow we will march to the Israeli Embassy as planned. Following a week of argument and attempts to bully and intimidate the demonstration organisers, the police have now agreed that protesters will assemble from 12pm, at Regent Street St James’s as we had originally intended.
Previous conditions that were imposed in a wholly unjustified attempt to prevent us from doing so have now been rescinded.
This debacle has caused serious disruption to our organising efforts. The constant imposition of conditions on our marches are an unacceptable curtailment of our right to demonstrate peacefully and we will continue to challenge them.
Nevertheless, this is a major victory in defence of the democratic right to protest. We are thankful to everyone in the movement who has stood firm in the face of these threats and to the MPs, members of the House of Lords, trade union leaders and many others who have made representations to the police.
We call on people to turn out in huge numbers in solidarity with Palestine tomorrow.
We are marching to bring an end to Israel’s ongoing genocide against the Palestinian people in Gaza and the continuing complicity of the British government in those crimes. We will not allow repressive tactics to distract us.
We call on everyone to join us from 12pm, at Regent Street St James’s.