Category: Protest

  •  

    AP: Jewish protesters flood Trump Tower's lobby to demand Mahmoud Khalil's release

    AP (3/13/25): “Demonstrators from [Jewish Voice for Peace] filled the lobby of Trump Tower…to denounce the immigration arrest of Mahmoud Khalil, a pro-Palestinian activist who helped lead protests against Israel at Columbia University.”

    In its coverage of Jewish Voice for Peace’s Trump Tower protest, Fox News obscured the Jewish identity of protesters—while echoing antisemitic conspiracy theories and racist tropes.

    JVP, an organization of Jewish Americans in solidarity with Palestinians, organized the March 13 sit-in of Trump’s Manhattan property in protest against ICE’s detention of Columbia University graduate and pro-Palestine protester Mahmoud Khalil.

    As Jewish solidarity with Palestinians facing genocide does not fit neatly into the channel’s narrative that pro-Palestine protests are inherently antisemitic, Fox’s all-day coverage of the protest either cast doubt upon the organization’s Jewish identity or minimized mentioning JVP by name altogether—all while painting demonstrators as antisemites.

    What’s more, discussion of the protest veered into unabashedly antisemitic conspiracy theories about how George Soros and his supposedly paid anti-American protesters seek to overthrow the West.

    The coverage comes as an absurd reminder that while right-wing fearmongers cynically paint opposition to genocide or violation of due-process as antisemitic, the most-watched US cable news network has no problem echoing Goebbelsian talking points.

    ‘Don’t give them any advertisement’

    Fox News: Now: Protesters occupy Trump Tower, Chant "Free Mahmoud, Free them all"

    “Look at some of the signage in here…. They hate Jewish Americans,” says Outnumbered host Harris Faulkner (3/13/25), while playing footage of protesters holding up signs proudly proclaiming their Jewish heritage.

    The argument made on other programs that the protesters were antisemitic, anti-American and aligned with Nazis, requires a specific hesitance towards profiling JVP probably best captured in an interview on the Story (3/13/25) with NYPD Chief John Chell. Asked who the group was that organized the protest, he responded, “We’re well-versed in this group, I don’t wanna give them any advertisement.”

    He only neglected to say the quiet part out loud—that a shout-out for JVP might advertise a reality in which protesters in solidarity with Palestine and campus demonstrators weren’t motivated by antisemitism.

    On Fox‘s Outnumbered (3/13/25), host Harris Faulkner and other panelists spent ample time portraying the protesters as antisemites—while intentionally obfuscating the overtly Jewish messaging of the demonstration.

    It’s not as though the panelists or reporter Eric Shawn were somehow unaware of who was protesting: About seven minutes into the coverage, panelist Emily Compagno read the back of one of the T-shirts, printed “Jews Say Stop Arming Israel.” Without missing a beat, she pivoted into an incoherent rant about how the Democratic Party and Ivy League universities venerate Hamas. A few minutes later, Eric Shawn stammered the group’s name once in passing, then never again.

    Unsurprisingly, these two incidental mentions were drowned out by relentless accusations that the protesters voiced overt hatred for Jews.

    Faulkner set the tone of the conversation with some of her leading remarks: “Look at some of the signage here…. They hate Israel, they hate Jewish Americans, they are Anti-American.” (Such virulently antisemitic signage included “Fight Nazis, Not Students,” “Opposing Fascism Is a Jewish Tradition” and “Never Again for Anyone.”) She then asked her audience, “If you are Jewish in that building, do you feel safe?”

    Guest panelist Lisa Boothe added that protesters “hate the West,” arguing that they “are supporting the Nazis.”

    ‘Some said they were Jews’

    Fox News: The Left is Torching Teslas and storming Trump Tower

    “Some said that they…were Jews,” the Five panelist Greg Gutfeld (3/13/25) stuttered, “but will the media check that? I doubt it! And they will not check…who paid for those signs, who paid for those T-shirts, and…who paid for the protesters.”

    When the Five (3/13/25) first mentioned the Jewish identities of the protesters about eight minutes into the broadcast, they did so to cast doubt upon the premise that Jews would engage in such an act: “Some said that they…were Jews,” Greg Gutfeld stuttered, “but will the media check that? I doubt it!”

    (It’s unclear who Gutfeld considers to be “the media,” given that he’s a panelist on the top-rated show at the most-watched cable news network.)

    Like on Outnumbered, the Five panelists accused protesters of supporting antisemitism while only mentioning the demonstrators’ Jewish identity in passing. Jesse Watters summarized the panel’s position best, stating that protesters were “supporting an antisemite” who “hates Jews” and “[blew] up Columbia.”

    The commentary hinges on the assumption that an Islamophobic audience will hear that an antisemitic crowd rallied at Trump Tower in support of Mahmoud Khalil “blow[ing] up Columbia”—and not follow up on who organized the rally, or why.

    Such buzzword-laden obfuscation reveals a paranoia in such coverage: If viewers do choose to follow up and learn more about the protesters, it might give the game away. The hoards of supposed antisemites might be raising perfectly reasonable questions about erosion of due-process and US bankrolling of genocide. Some such protests, like the one at Trump Tower, might even be Jewish-led.

    ‘Hands in many protest pots’

    Fox News: Figure: Jewish Voice for Peace's Funding Network, NGO monitor 2019-2021

    Fox News discussed George Soros as though he’s the Palestine movement’s top financier—though according to its own graphic (Will Cain Show, 3/13/25), Soros is only JVP’s fifth-biggest funder, donating a third as much as its largest donor, and accounting for less than 2% of the group’s total financing.

    Curiously, for all of their concern for antisemitism, Outnumbered, the Story, the Five, the Will Cain Show (3/13/25) and Ingraham Angle (3/13/25) all had one thing in common: a conspiratorial fascination with allegedly astroturfed leftist financing. Laura Ingraham was particularly explicit:

    The group Jewish Voice for Peace…bills itself as a home for left-leaning Jews…and it gets its biggest funding from groups associated with George Soros…. Soros himself has his hands in many protest pots, stirring up a toxic brew of antisemitism and anti-Americanism.

    She cited a graphic displayed on the Will Cain Show, which was also referenced on the Five. It depicted Soros’ Open Society fund as the fifth-biggest funder of JVP for 2019–21, contributing $150,000. Given that JVP has an annual budget of more than $3 million, this suggests that Soros is responsible for less than 2% of the group’s financing.

    Ingraham nonetheless felt the need to rail against Soros and the broader Jewish left. She also went on to characterize the pro-Palestine movement as “the overthrow-of-the-West cause.”

    So the “antisemitic” pro-Palestine protests are bankrolled by an anti-American Jewish billionaire seeking to overthrow the West? Like her peers on Outnumbered and the Five, Ingraham is empowered to advance such harmful tropes, so long as she also tacks on a spurious charge of “antisemitism.”

    Anti-Arab, anti-immigrant tropes

    Fox News: Radical Rage: Left-Wing agitators mob Trump Tower for mahmoud Khalil

    Five panelist and former Westchester County District Attorney Jeanine Pirro (3/13/25) condemned protesters “want[ing] Mahmoud [Khalil] to have all of his constitutional rights,” implying that violation of Khalil’s due process is legal because he “hates all of our Western values.”

    Fox’s obfuscation of the protest’s overtly Jewish messaging is underpinned by another assumption—that Palestinian-led or immigrant-led protest against the genocide is somehow less legitimate than Jewish American–led protest. Coverage not only obscured JVP’s role in organizing the protest, but used anti-Arab tropes and calls for deportation to smear the legitimacy of protesters’ demands.

    When Jesse Watters evoked fantasies of student protesters blowing up universities, or Outnumbered guest panelist (and former Bush White House press secretary) Ari Fleischer accused protesters of being illegal residents that “should all be deported from this country,” they played to the racist impulses of their audiences.

    Mahmoud Khalil is a Palestinian-Syrian immigrant—thus, his opposition to a genocide in which Israel has killed at least 51,000 Palestinians in Gaza, with another 10,000 presumed dead under the rubble, is illegitimate. And if JVP protesters are Arab immigrants too, then their opposition to repression and genocide is meritless and antisemitic.

    It’s another reason why it’s in Fox’s best interest not to identify the Trump Tower protesters—to allow for the assumption that they’re Arabs, or immigrants, which somehow discredits them.

    Enemies with no name

    JVP: If your focus is on Palestinian liberation, why do you focus on organizing Jews? Why not just participate in Palestinian-led efforts?JVP has a specific, critical role to play in the movement for Palestinian liberation. As Jews, we work to answer the call of our Palestinian partners to build a Jewish movement that can effectively form a counterweight to Jewish Zionist support for Israeli apartheid. That often includes defending our Palestinian partner organizations, when they are accused of antisemitism for criticizing the policies of the Israeli state. Our role in the movement for Palestinian freedom is to shake the U.S.-Israel alliance by fundamentally changing the financial, cultural, and political calculus of Jewish support for Israeli apartheid and for Zionism.

    As a Jewish-led organization in solidarity with Palestinians, JVP stresses the importance of challenging false antisemitism smears against their Palestinian partners and in creating a Jewish future divested from Zionism.

    Fox News’s hesitancy to identify JVP is a striking contrast to Fox’s general proclivity for naming enemies. A search on FoxNews.com for the “New Black Panther Party,” a fringe Black nationalist group, yields more than 100 results; compare that to less than 30 hits on AP‘s website. A Search for “Dylan Mulvaney,” a trans influencer who was targeted in a mass-hate campaign in 2023, yields more than 5,000 results on Fox, compared to AP’s 50.

    Fox News thrives upon enemies—but Jewish Voice for Peace is different. As an openly Jewish-American group, JVP challenges Fox News’ narrative that protests against genocide in Gaza are rooted in antisemitism.

    “We organize our people and we resist Zionism because we love Jews, Jewishness and Judaism,” JVP’s website says. “Our struggle against Zionism is not only an act of solidarity with Palestinians, but also a concrete commitment to creating the Jewish futures we all deserve.”

    To be clear, conservative and centrist outlets’ continued preoccupation with the supposed antisemitism of opponents of Israel’s genocide is never in good faith—as when the New York Times (4/14/25), reporting on “Trump’s Pressure Campaign Against Universities,” blithely claimed that “pro-Palestinian students on college campuses…harassed Jewish students,” without noting that many of the pro-Palestinian students were themselves Jewish. But the charge of antisemitism is even more ludicrous coming from an outlet that uses antisemitic tropes to make its own attacks on the pro-Palestine movement.

    And the charge is most ridiculous coming from a network that is too afraid to name its enemy, as if the mere acknowledgement that some Jews oppose US support for Israel’s genocide might shake the foundations of its whole narrative.

    This post was originally published on FAIR.

  • Prominent Sudanese organisations in the UK have come together to write a damning letter to foreign secretary David Lammy over the situation in Sudan.

    A coalition of groups gathered under the marker The Sudanese Initiative Against War, and a coalition representing Sudanese doctors, lawyers, and journalists, and many more groups penned the open letter ahead of a planned protest in London on 19 April. More than 14 million people have been displaced since the start of the civil war in Sudan. Some estimates have found that more than 150,000 people have been killed.

    On Saturday 19 April, a demonstration will assemble at 1pm to march from Marble Arch to Downing Street.

    Sudan summit

    The letter raises a number of points the group feel have gone unaddressed by the government. They write:

    When discussing solutions to the war and conflicts in Sudan, it is essential to highlight and address the root causes, reflect on previous failed international and regional interventions and take into consideration the local on-ground popular forces and their genuine demand of having a sovereign civil democratic state that is in control of its resources and national economy.

    Earlier this week, the British government led an attempt to progress ceasefire negotiations. However, talks soon fell apart as Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) failed to reach consensus. As the Guardian reported:

    Sudan and others have long accused the UAE of arming the RSF – which it strenuously denies – while Egypt has maintained close ties with the Sudanese army.

    And, in fact, the open letter to Lammy expressed concerns at the UAE’s involvement:

    we strongly condemn the role played by the United Arab Emirates and its direct involvement in Sudanese affairs through its military and logistical support to the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) and funding their political meetings. We equally condemn Egypt’s government reported involvement in orchestrating the 25th Oct 2021 Coup and ongoing military support to the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF).

    As far as the coalition of prominent Sudanese groups is concerned:

    Achieving peace must come through ensuring justice and accountability. Those who committed atrocities or participated in funding or physically supported the warring parties must be disempowered and sanctioned. The impunity for actions committed must end now.

    Accusations abound

    Both Egypt and the UAE have been accused of interference in the Sudanese civil war. The UAE have repeatedly denied the claims:

    All allegations of the United Arab Emirates’ involvement in any form of aggression or destabilization in Sudan, or its provision of any military, logistical, financial or political support to any faction in Sudan, are spurious, unfounded, and lack any credible evidence to support them.

    However, these denials fly in the face of mounting evidence from the United Nations (UN) and other sources. Just days before the peace summit, the Guardian obtained a leaked report from the UN which contradicted the Arab state’s claims that they’re not supplying arms to fighters in Sudan. The Guardian reported:

    an internal report – marked highly confidential and seen by the Guardian – detected “multiple” flights from the UAE in which transport planes made apparently deliberate attempts to avoid detection as they flew into bases in Chad where arms smuggling across the border into Sudan has been monitored.

    The allegations raise complications for the British foreign secretary, David Lammy, who controversially invited the UAE alongside 19 other states for Sudan peace talks at Lancaster House on 15 April.

    The report demonstrates a “consistent pattern” of weapons originating from the UAE and being sent to Chad. The leak is particularly embarrassing for Lammy who has said:

    Many have given up on Sudan – that is wrong – it’s morally wrong… We simply cannot look away.

    As the open letter made clear, until Lammy is able to take the UAE to task for their interference in Sudan, talks of ceasefire or peace are doomed. Meanwhile, the RSF’s leader has accused Egypt of being involved in air strikes in Sudan. Egypt have denied the claims, but as the results of the summit show, global interference in Sudan is hampering the ceasefire process.

    Engineering peace in Sudan

    In the open letter to Lammy, the groups conclude:

    We urge the international community to hear the voices of Sudanese civil society, grassroots organisations, women and youth, who have been at the forefront of the revolution to achieve a long-lasting peace rather than short-lived temporary solutions.

    Sudan is being torn apart, but until international interference is addressed the conflict cannot be resolved. Meanwhile, it is Sudanese people who continue to suffer unimaginable atrocities while political leaders stall and delay.

    The march on 19 April to Downing Street hopes to put pressure on the British government to follow its talk with action and put justice and accountability forwards.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Maryam Jameela

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Five Just Stop Oil supporters found guilty for planning an action at Heathrow have launched appeals against their convictions after evidence emerged of serious misconduct by the jury.

    Just Stop Oil: appeals against sentence launched

    The five launching appeals were among eight Just Stop Oil supporters found guilty of conspiracy to cause a public nuisance by majority verdict at Isleworth Crown Court after a seven week trial before Judge Duncan.

    Raj Chada of Hodge, Jones, and Allen will be filing appeals on behalf of Rosa Hicks and Hannah Schafer, while Adam Beard, Sally Davidson and Sean O’Callaghan will be filing separate appeals.

    The grounds of the appeal include that the Attorney General has received evidence of juror misconduct during the trial which has been referred for police investigation. The misconduct arose from one juror making internet searches about the defendants and the Just Stop Oil campaign and sharing that within the jury room. In light of this evidence the appeal will say that the guilty verdicts are manifestly unsafe.

    Further grounds for appeal include that the judge was wrong to imply that the existence of a climate emergency is a matter of opinion as that contradicts the agreed facts in the case and that the police exhibited prejudicial conduct during the trial including in front of the jury. They wrongly arrested Sally Davidson, mid-trial, after confusion over her bail conditions and arrested a Just Stop Oil supporter who had been sitting in the public gallery at court and in sight of one of the jurors, who later described the incident to two further jurors.

    ‘Devastating’

    One of the appellants, Sally Davidson, 37, a hairdresser from Portland, Dorset said:

    The prospect of facing a retrial is personally devastating but in the interest of justice we have no other option but to appeal these convictions. Some of our group have now spent nine months in prison awaiting trial and now sentencing.

    Judge Duncan ruled early in our trial that the reality of climate breakdown while “concerning” was irrelevant to the jurors deliberations. She then intervened to stop us each and every time we tried to communicate the severity of climate collapse, and the threat it poses to the rule of law. In trials like ours, relating to acts of conscience, juries are being routinely told they must ignore reality, and focus on evidence without the relevant context.

    This trend by members of the Judiciary to attempt to decouple the law from morality is not how most people understand the British legal system to work. It is obvious that these trials are politically motivated, morally wrong and a huge waste of public money. Money that could be better spent supporting vulnerable people and those who are being made increasingly unsafe due to the deadly impacts of unchecked fossil fuel burning.

    Adam Beard, 55, a gardener from Stroud, who had represented himself at trial said:

    After seven months in prison on remand for resisting the genocidal burning of fossil fuels, and more than seven weeks in court, it now looks like our convictions followed misconduct by at least one member of the jury. This followed a trial where we were frequently stopped by the judge from telling the jury the truth.

    We will be sentenced on 16 May and I am likely to face further time in prison. For the sake of justice it is imperative that our convictions be quashed and my co-defendants who are still in prison be released.

    A ‘gruelling trial’ – and now this?

    Hannah Schafer, 61, a sailing instructor from Cardigan said:

    We have been through a long and gruelling seven week trial which must have cost the state a small fortune. Much of this time was spent arguing about why we shouldn’t be allowed to explain our actions to the jury. We are now undertaking an appeal due to issues around the behavior of that jury. Is it any wonder they used their initiative to find out more after being fobbed off and sent out of the room numerous times during the trial?

    This has led to a situation where our convictions could be deemed unsafe and we may have to go through the whole trial again. We have all spent time in prison, at yet more cost to taxpayers, and face long custodial sentences at our next appearance on 16 May.

    Is this a sensible way to police peaceful protest? Is it a sensible use of the overstretched and under funded justice system? Does it represent good value for money? Or would it be more sensible to address the issues we are trying to draw attention to – the need to take urgent action to halt the death and destruction being willfully wrought on the world by the fossil fuel industry.

    Tim Crosland, a former government lawyer and spokesperson for Defend Our Juries, said:

    There is compelling evidence that these convictions resulted from a juror conducting Google research and sharing partially false and highly prejudicial information with their fellow jurors. Given the concealment of evidence from juries in these cases, it’s not surprising that juries lose faith in the process, with unpredictable results.

    As it is, it should be obvious to everyone that that is a fatal flaw in the trial process and the convictions must now be quashed as a matter of urgency. For the moment the trial judge is left in the invidious position of having to pass sentence on people on 16 May, knowing that they have not properly been convicted of anything.

    Let’s hope some common sense and humanity prevails.

    Just Stop Oil: time will tell

    The Heathrow trial , which was due to start on 20 January, was delayed after Isleworth Crown Court experienced problems with its heating system and ran into the limit of its ‘sitting days’ allowed by the Ministry of Justice. Defendants were told that the trial would be postponed to September 2025 at the earliest and possibly would not be heard until February 2027. Four days later they were informed that the trial would begin on 27 January.

    The Heathrow eight are due to be sentenced on 16th May.

    Two of the eight, Luke Elson and Luke Watson have been in prison on remand since 24 July 2024. Will Goldring was remanded following the trial to await sentencing. Rory Wilson, who pleaded guilty in September, was recently granted bail after being on remand for eight months.

    If leave to appeal is granted the case may not be heard for many months. If the appeal were to be successful, and the convictions quashed, the most likely outcome is that the prosecution would seek a retrial.

    Featured image via Jamie Lowe

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Members of Fossil Free London, Energy Embargo for Palestine and the Free West Papua Campaign gathered outside BP’s London HQ in St James’s Square last night ahead of BP’s AGM, taking place today.

    BP: stop fuelling genocide

    Campaigners held a banner reading ‘stop fuelling genocide and climate breakdown’, and chanting ‘Shut down BP’:

    BP

    Since the wake of Israel’s genocide on Gaza, BP has come under fire for its supply of energy supplies to Israel. In September 2024, Energy Embargo for Palestine identified in a research report that 30% of Israel’s total energy supplies passes through the Baku-Tblisi-Ceyhan (BTC) pipeline, which has gone on to fuel military operations in Gaza:

    Last month it was additionally revealed that the gas licences awarded to a consortium of oil companies, including BP, off the coast of the Gaza strip have now been renewed. Following ICJ’s ruling on Israel; human rights experts have warned that countries and corporations supplying oil to Israeli armed forces may be complicit in war crimes and genocide.

    The last financial year has also seen BP roll back on its climate pledge and investments, the intended resignation of their energy transition-conscious Chair, Helge Lunde, and an increase in their oil investments:

    In February, BP announced they are increasing its investment in oil and gas to $10bn a year while cutting more than $5bn from its low-carbon investment plans. BP’s CEO Murray Auchincloss said the company has gone “too far, too fast” towards the energy transition, despite the Grantham Research Institute finding BP’s former transition plans didn’t constitute a “credible plan”.

    This announcement comes in just as the UK is predicted to see the hottest April since records began.

    Destroying the planet, killing people

    Lila from Energy Embargo for Palestine said:

    As BP abandons its renewable energy commitments and doubles down on oil and gas production, we know that this is not a departure from its usual operations. From the gas flares in Iraq to the ecocide in Palestine, BP’s operations is premised on the destruction of both people and planet.

    BP

    Robin Wells, director of Fossil Free London, said of the company:

    Its corporate greed kills millions through the fuelling of a genocide and through the climate breakdown that continues at pace.

    The writing is on the wall. BP doubling down on oil and gas is just part of the standard functioning of Big Oil. This will never change. It’s clearer than ever that is no place for oily, greed-driven corporations in the world we need to build. Shut BP down.

    Featured image and additional images via Andrea Domeniconi/Fossil Free London

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Two people have been arrested after occupying the roof of GRiD Defence Systems, Elbit’s military hardware supplier, on Wednesday 16 April. The activists were, of course, from Palestine Action – and the protest was over the company’s complicity with Israel’s ongoing genocide in Gaza.

    Palestine Action: going off GRiD

    This morning, two activists from Palestine Action successfully evaded security, to occupy the roof of ‘GRiD Defence Systems’ at Holtspur Lane, High Wycombe:

    Palestine Action

    The military hardware firm is a key supplier to Elbit Systems, Israel’s biggest weapons maker, manufacturing a range of military computers and processors, as well as other military electronics:

    The two actionists took to the roof – before cops delivered a heavy-handed response as always:

    Palestine Action

    In addition to supplying Elbit, GRiD provide key components to other arms manufacturers who have been up to their necks in the Gaza Genocide, including Lockheed Martin. manufacturers of F-35 ‘fighter’ jets, Leonardo, who produce Apache attack helicopters, and Instro Precision who make weapons sights, target acquisition systems, and electronic optics systems for the Israeli military.

    Palestine Action last visited GRiD in June 2024, with four activists barricading themselves inside the plant, and destroying military hardware found there.

    At the time, a Palestine Action spokesperson warned “GRiD is just one of the companies we know to be supplying Elbit. From intel gleaned from actions, to information passed on by whistleblowers – we know who you are, and any firm doing business which enables genocide should not be surprised when they too are shut down”.

    Dismantle the war machine

    The aim of Palestine Action, in stopping production at GRiD, is to intervene in the genocidal supply chain, which allows British companies to manufacture weapons, in whole or in part, which are then used to devastating effect against the civilian population of Gaza.

    A spokesperson for Palestine Action said:

    Since our previous occupation of the GRiD Defence Systems site, Gaza has been reduced to rubble, its entire infrastructure laid waste, and the population systematically massacred. Israel threatens the very existence of the Palestinian people, in Palestine, and while they commit war-crime after war-crime, Keir Starmer, and his corrupt and morally-bankrupt front bench, say nothing.

    In marked contrast, there are still people in this country willing to put their liberty on the line to take direct action against Israel’s military supply chain and uphold international law. We are on the right side of history.

    Featured image and additional images via Direct Action Images 

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • An open letter has had to spell out to the UK Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) British citizens’ rights to free speech, as well as international laws enshrining oppressed peoples’ rights to resist their oppressors. This is because the CPS currently has preposterous terrorism charges levied against two Palestine advocates and SOAS University of London students. Specifically, in March, the Met Police arrested and charged the ‘SOAS 2’ under Section 12 of the Terrorism Act.

    The force imposed this repressive overreach of terrorism powers for the crime of?

    Speaking out for Palestine.

    It’s but another instance of the Israel genocide-enabling British state targeting the people standing against the brutal Zionist war criminal and apartheid regime.

    SOAS 2: an open letter calling the CPS to drop the outrageous charges

    In early March, the UK criminal justice system ramped up its repressive crackdown on those speaking out against Israel. An atrocious abuse of Section 12 Terrorism Act powers has seen one vocal critic of Israel served charges and a second arrested days after.

    On 4 March, the CPS issued the trumped-up charges against Sarah. This came more than 13 months after her initial arrest.

    The Metropolitan Police had originally arrested Sarah in a dawn raid on 31 January 2024. Notably, this was at the behest of Zionist legal lobby group, UK Lawyers for Israel, who’d pushed for the force to make the arrest.

    Sarah’s crime? A speech she gave at SOAS University in October 2023. In this, Sarah had articulated support for Palestinian’s rights to armed resistance under illegal occupation and an oppressive apartheid regime. Alarmingly, Zionists had brought the speech in question to the attention of the Met by tagging them in social media posts online.

    In other words, Sarah was arrested, and now has been charged, due to a concerted campaign from Zionists to silence supporters of a free Palestine. Specifically, the charges centre round the allegation her speech was “inviting support for a proscribed organisation”, namely Hamas.

    Then, on 7 March, the Met arrested the second student on suspicion of an offence under the same legislation.

    The Act carries a possible sentence of up to 14 years in prison.

    So now, an open letter with a significant list of left-wing activist groups, esteemed academics, journalists, musicians, and more, has called out the CPS’s outrageous charges.

    An attempt to ‘intimidate and censor’ support for the Palestinian’s freedom struggle

    The Revolutionary Communist Group Fight Racism! Fight Imperialism! (FRFI) launched the SOAS 2 letter towards the end of March. Since then, it has garnered more than eighty signatories. An accompanying public petition has also brought in a further over 2,000 signatures to date.

    Significantly, the open letter is demanding that the CPS drop all charges against Sarah and discontinue its investigations against the other SOAS student. The letter states that the state “suppression of free speech” in these cases is a “calculated targeting” and:

    is an attempt to intimidate and censor any expression of support for the Palestinian freedom struggle. It is an attack on the entire solidarity movement.

    Crucially, it lambasted the use of counter-terror laws clamping down on expressions of support for Palestinian resistance. Notably, under international law, occupied people have the right to defend themselves against occupying forces. This includes by armed resistance if necessary. So, as the open letter lays out:

    Resistance is not terrorism

    Kotsai Sigauke from FRFI therefore told the Canary in a comment that:

    It is not terrorism for an oppressed people to resist ethnic cleansing, settler colonialism and genocide through armed struggle. It was not terrorism when the people of Algeria fought French imperialism, it was not terrorism when the people of Ireland fought British imperialism, it was not terrorism when black South Africans fought apartheid and it is not terrorism for Palestinians to fight back against the genocidal Zionist state. United Nations General Assembly resolution 37/43 and the Geneva Conventions Protocol 1 explicitly gives Palestinians, and all oppressed people, the right to resist their oppressors by any available means, that includes armed struggle.

    Signees have faced similar state repression

    Of course, the SOAS 2 joins an unenviable list of Palestine advocates with all too similar experiences of state repression. There’s a palpable and growing trend of state crackdowns on free speech in relation to Israel’s genocide in Gaza.

    Police forces around the country have continued to violently crack down on student Palestine protest encampments. A damning exposé from Liberty Investigates revealed in February that universities have subserviently collaborated with local police forces investigating their students. Acting as servile and complicit instruments of the state:

    at least 36 universities had correspondence with the police concerning student protests and more than a dozen held meetings with officers. In many cases universities shared social media posts or images of event flyers with police, and discussed the political views of guest speakers.

    Among those who have so far signed the open letter is Electronic Intifada journalist Asa Winstanley. In October, the Met’s counter-terrorism unit raided his home and seized all his electronic devices. While he wasn’t arrested, nor charged, the act of police intimidation of a journalist investigating and writing on Israel’s genocide in Gaza had all the same repressive ingredients as the Met and CPS’s treatment of the SOAS 2.

    Winstanley also faced state accusations of encouraging “support for a proscribed organisation”. This is deliberate harassment of a journalist – by any other name – from a key arm of the state’s law enforcement.

    Of course, Winstanley wasn’t the first journalist advocating for Palestine that the state attempted to silence using counter-terror laws last year either.

    The Met raid on Winstanley’s home followed British border police detaining independent journalist Richard Medhurst at Heathrow airport. It also came after another raid by counter-terror cops on journalist and activist Sarah Wilkinson’s home, who also had personal items confiscated.

    Systemic state repression

    Another signee is the Network for Police Monitoring (Netpol).

    The same day FRFI published the open letter over the SOAS 2, Netpol put out a first-of-its kind damning new report. The State of Protest in 2024 laid out in no uncertain terms how aggressive police use of Tory anti-protest laws and portrayals of protesters as threats to democracy, amounted to nothing less than state repression. In one salient part of the report, Netpol detailed that:

    Out of 80 arrests for terrorism offences directly related to the war in Gaza, about half relate to protests

    The point here is that the state has liberally deployed these counter-terror powers against a significant number of Palestine supporters.

    This has included Palestine Action activists like founder Richard Barnard. The Labour Party government’s attorney general, Richard Hermer, personally signed off on the terrorism charges the state is bringing against him. Once again, it’s all over speeches he made at protests. Naturally, Section 12 reared its head amidst the charges. Again, this alleged he’d expressed support for a proscribed organisation: Hamas.

    Netpol’s report marked out the terrorism offences as one tool amid the broadscale arsenal of the state’s repressive reactionary tactics to silence advocates for a free Palestine.

    Sigauke from FRFI drew similar parallels with the ongoing Met police use of dodgy pre-crime laws, and frequent arrests under Tory anti-protest powers:

    Under this Labour government we’re seeing an escalation in repression against the working class and the Palestine solidarity movement in this country. The Metropolitan Police carried out an outrageous raid on Youth Demand’s meeting on 27 March and the Filton 18 are still held in prison on remand for taking action against genocide. There is also the SOAS 2.

    Needless to say, Youth Demand is another signatory to the open letter.

    He continued:

    The SOAS 2, the Filton 18 and Youth Demand all need our unconditional solidarity. Everyone who supports Palestine, wants to defend democratic rights and cares about free speech must support them.

    SOAS 2: time to stand together and fight back

    The FRFI noted one vital thing that over a year and a half of Israel’s genocide and British state response to protests against should now make abundantly clear. The police is not – and never has been – on marginalised communities’ side. Because time and again, the racist enforcement arm of the establishment has shown its alignment to the oppressors.

    So, Sigauke also called out the Labour Party government for increasing police funding. It laid into the government for further machinations to oppress working class, Black, brown, and other oppressed communities in the UK:

    Under the Labour government, the state is also introducing measures to further criminalise the working class and anyone who dissents. One of the goals of its ‘safer streets mission’ is to put 13,000 more racist police on our streets. That means more black youths being harassed, more people being brutalised and more black children being strip searched (sexually assaulted). The Labour government is also bringing in the Crime and Policing Bill that has a whole laundry list of measures that will oppress and criminalise the working class, give the police more powers, and further restrict our right to protest.

    Ultimately, he said that the state’s increasing repression signals something significant. This is that, people speaking out and standing up for Palestine has them rattled:

    The Labour Party and the police want to crush the movement for Palestine, criminalise young people and oppress the working class because they are scared of them. Capitalism and imperialism are decaying, that is why the state is becoming more reactionary. We won’t sit down and accept criminalisation and repression, we’re going to stand up and fight back. That is why we are supporting the protests in April.

    In short: the SOAS 2 are a testament to the state running scared. Everyone who stands on the side of and in solidarity with oppressed communities, here and in Palestine, should support them.

    You can sign the petition against this latest appalling manifestation of state violence and repression here.

    Featured image supplied

    By Hannah Sharland

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • This coverage is made possible through a partnership between Grist and WBEZ, a public radio station serving the Chicago metropolitan region.

    Chicago city leaders are set to consider a major overhaul in how and where polluting businesses are allowed to open, nearly two years after the city settled a civil rights complaint that alleged a pattern of discrimination threatening the health of low-income communities of color.

    The measure, expected to be introduced Wednesday, would transform how heavy industry is located and operated in the country’s third largest city. If passed into law, it would require city officials to assess the cumulative pollution burden on communities before approving new industrial projects.

    As the Trump administration dismantles protections for poor communities facing lopsided levels of pollution, Chicago’s ordinance is a test case for local action under a federal government hostile toward environmental justice. Over the past three months, the Trump administration has already undone long-standing orders to address uneven environmental burdens at the federal level and challenged government programs monitoring environmental justice issues across the country. 

    Now, advocates are hoping the local legislation becomes a blueprint for how state and local governments can leverage zoning and permitting to protect vulnerable communities from becoming sacrifice zones. 

    “The Trump administration is trying to erase history,” said Gina Ramirez, the Natural Resources Defense Council’s Midwest director of environmental health. “You can’t erase our industrial past — it’s literally haunting us.”

    Chicago’s industrial history is especially pronounced in low-income communities on the city’s South and West sides. The proposed ordinance would give these communities a voice in the permitting process via a new environmental justice advisory board, Ramirez said. 

    “Nobody wants to be sick,” said Cheryl Johnson, an environmental activist on the Far South Side who has been advocating for pollution protections for almost 40 years.

    The Chicago ordinance is named after Johnson’s mother, Hazel Johnson, who started fighting in the 1970s for the health of her neighbors at a public housing community surrounded by a “toxic doughnut” of polluters.

    Cheryl Johnson runs People for Community Recovery, an organization started by her mother, with the same mission to protect human health. “The most important thing — and the only thing that we get — is good health or bad health,” Johnson said. “That’s what my mother fought for.”

    In 2020, Johnson’s group, along with several other local environmental justice organizations, launched a civil rights complaint over the city’s role in the relocation of a metal-shredding operation from its longtime home on the North Side to a majority Black and Latino neighborhood on the far South Side of the city.

    An investigation by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development concluded in 2022 that Chicago had long placed polluters in low-income areas, while sparing majority-white affluent neighborhoods. 

    In a binding agreement with former President Joe Biden’s administration, the city promised to offer a legal fix. Former mayor Lori Lightfoot signed the agreement with HUD hours before she left office in 2023. Her successor, Mayor Brandon Johnson, vowed to follow the agreement and said that September that an ordinance proposal would be offered in short order.

    But weeks and months turned into years, and community, health, and environmental advocates complained that the mayor was slow-walking his promises. Nearly two years later, the city is finally set to deliver. 

    Not all community groups are happy with the proposal. Theresa McNamara, an activist with the Southwest Environmental Alliance, said at a recent public meeting she didn’t think the measure would go far enough. She called it a “weak piece of crap” based on her understanding of the main points.

    Experts said the law’s success would depend on the city’s will to execute and enforce it.

    “There’s a lot of states and even cities that have assessment tools, but the question is, what do you do with those?” said Ana Baptisa, an environmental policy professor at The New School in New York.

    In New Jersey, Baptista helped pass a similar ordinance — then the first of its kind — through the Newark City Council in 2016. Since then, local and state governments across the country have followed suit. At least eight states have passed this type of legislation, including California, Minnesota, New York, and Delaware. 

    Still, Baptista said Newark’s bill has failed to rein in polluting industries. “It proved to be what we feared: a sort of formality that oftentimes doesn’t even get completed,” she said. 

    Even without power to deny or constrain new pollution sources, the advisory board itself marks progress, according to Oscar Sanchez, whose Southeast Environmental Task Force helped file the original civil rights complaint,. 

    Sanchez added that as the federal government retreats from its commitments to environmental justice, state and local entities are on the front line of buffering communities from greater pollution burdens.

    “We are pushing the needle of what people can try to achieve in their own communities,” he said.

    This story was originally published by Grist with the headline  A Chicago law could shift where heavy industry operates — and who bears the burden of pollution on Apr 16, 2025.

    This post was originally published on Grist.


  • This content originally appeared on Amnesty International and was authored by Amnesty International.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • A vibrant new, inclusive online community has sprung up to fight back against the Labour Party government’s brutal Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) disability benefit cuts and the rampant ableism these plans have emboldened.

    Filling a vital niche, Disability Rebellion is one disabled artist, writer, and activist’s answer to a rights movement that too often still, excludes chronically ill and disabled people unable to turn out to in-person demonstrations.

    The Canary spoke to founder Atlanta about the new group, and its ambitions for taking on the impending cuts.

    Disability Rebellion: ‘galvanised into action’ by ‘cruel DWP cuts’

    After the Labour Party DWP boss Liz Kendall announced the government’s suite of regressive disability benefit cuts, Atlanta launched Disability Rebellion towards the end of March.

    Currently, the group spans two social media sites. On X, it has a community that X users can request to join. Over on Facebook, there’s a landing page, alongside a similar private group to become a member.

    In a nutshell, it describes itself as:

    a feisty fightback against ableism + government cuts. A space free from ableists!

    That is, in essence, the basic premise of the new group. It’s a welcoming online community and safe space for disabled people to organise. In that vein, Atlanta explained that:

    There is a strong emphasis on being a supportive community where we disabled people can help each other, support each other and be there for each other. Such solidarity and support is needed at this difficult time for disabled people, where we are not only having to manage our disabilities and illnesses, but also having to fight for the healthcare we need, fight against hateful rhetoric and ableism, keep a roof over our heads and fight against the cuts. It is a lot to manage for anyone alone and I hope that as a community we can help each other get through this.

    Significantly, Atlanta has expressed how she was “galvanised into action” by the government’s DWP Green Paper announcements. In her online blog, she confided how these impacted her and were the impetus for the new group:

    The cruel government cuts to disability benefits felt like I had been dumped into an ice bath. After a decade of being trapped in the agonising, mind-numbing fugue of chronic migraine, I woke up to harsh reality; the anger and despair was immense. I could no longer sit there and watch as the government gutted disability benefits and continued the work started by the Tories.

    This is when the Disability Rebellion was born.

    Atlanta told the Canary that its aims are to:

    put pressure on the government to abandon the cuts, to raise awareness of the ableism in our society, to fight back against anti-disabled hate, to challenge the harmful and hateful rhetoric coming from the government about disabled people, and to provide a supportive environment where rebels can network with each other for support and solidarity without the fear of abuse from trolls and ableists.

    True inclusivity means breaking the mould on traditional methods of activism

    Straight away, it’s evident that Atlanta’s own experience living with chronic health conditions has fed into the vision for the group. Notably, while the moment has called for concerted boots and wheels on the ground action, it shouldn’t mean bed-bound and house-bound disabled people are left out of forging the fight back.

    In fact, chronically ill and disabled people at home are arguably some of the voices most needed. Notably, it’s this demographic who are more likely to be among those unable to work.

    Of course, it’s also the case that DWP cuts will hit them the hardest. The government has justified these plans through hostility to those who can’t work. All the while, ‘disability confident’ work-from-home part-time positions are shamefully sparse, to virtually non-existent.

    So, Atlanta told the Canary that:

    We are creating a community where disabled people from all over the country can come together to oppose ableism and the cuts – in whichever way they can. The difficulty disabled people have is that we’re typically isolated in a largely inaccessible world – and so it can be difficult for us to be represented and to register our discontent and dissent using traditional methods. It can be difficult for many disabled activists to get to  protests and so, disabled people from over the country are coming together in this online community to share ideas and work together in a supportive environment to find ways to effectively oppose ableism and the cuts to welfare.

    Moreover, she articulated that she wants Disability Rebellion to embody inclusivity:

    We recognise that disability is intersectional, affecting people from all backgrounds, and so Disability Rebellion is an inclusive movement that represents disabled people, regardless of who you are, where you are from, and regardless of sexuality, gender, sex, age, disability and religion. It has been amazing seeing people from all backgrounds coming together to fight back. There is strength in numbers. If we are united, we can stand up as one large community and tell society that “No, this is not how we are meant to treat disabled people and other marginalised groups.” It is easy to divide us – especially in a time where so many people (not just disabled people) are struggling to have their basic needs met – so we must resist that by working together and being inclusive.

    In short, Disability Rebellion has thrown down the gauntlet in the disability rights movement. It’s posing a vital challenge to all groups fighting on the welfare cut front. This is: what good is a movement advocating for societal inclusivity, if it isn’t embedding this within its own work?

    An ‘evolving and growing’ community with bold plans

    Speaking to Atlanta, it’s clear the group has bold plans to boot for all this.

    The group wants to “educate the public” about the lived realities of being disabled.

    On top of this, Atlanta envisages the group going for charity status. In particular, she wants to explore this option in order to raise funds for the group’s future activism.

    She also hopes that the group can assist in funding legal cases that disabled people bring to oppose the DWP cuts. Specifically, she articulated that she’d like:

    to see a mass class legal action against the government and I’m sure we could work with other disability movements and organisations to make this possible.

    There’s no shortage of ideas. Atlanta mused that she also eventually intends for the group to:

    have a team of advisors on board who can help disabled people advocate for their rights.

    Overall, she noted that:

    As this is an evolving and growing community, we are excited for the future and can’t wait to see where this takes us next.

    However, as it says on the tin, it’s a ‘rebellion’ first and foremost – a focal point for a call to action. This is precisely what Atlanta wants to see the group become. In particular, she relayed to the Canary how Disability Rebellion is, in part, a response to the urgent need for direct action:

    We want to make some noise – not just online – so we want to eventually organise direct actions (such as protests) that are accessible for disabled people. We would like to work with other disability movements, charities and organisations who align with our values. We recognise that we need training because this is new to most of us. We’d welcome all the help we can get!

    Fighting ableism brings out all the bigots

    The set up as private groups across the two platforms has enabled Atlanta and fellow admins Jessica and Matt to moderate the content. Atlanta lamented how necessary this has been. Unfortunately, but perhaps unsurprisingly on the cesspool of billionaire-owned social media that have allowed bigotry to fester, and at times actively fanned it, the group has faced the very “rampant ableism” Atlanta started the group to dismantle.

    Needless to say then, Disability Rebellion has of course attracted a rancid panoply of far-right ableist detractors:

    The only negative response has come from ableist trolls online and uniformed members of the public who believe the rhetoric against disabled people. Some of the abuse I’ve seen directed at myself, other members and members of the wider disabled community has been quite horrific, with some sinking to fascism and demanding that disabled people be eradicated from society because we are a drain on society, according to them.

    However, Atlanta and team have only seen this as all the more reason for Disability Rebellion to press on:

    every time we see comments like this, it provides further motivation to stand up and counter that violent narrative.

    In short, the group won’t be cowed – the ecosystem of hate is exactly why it has sprung up – and it won’t be silenced.

    What’s more, this has paled in comparison to the broad and spanning support Disability Rebellion has compelled. Atlanta said that:

    We are totally blown away by the response to our growing movement – which has been mainly positive – with a lot of support and encouragement coming from disabled people, activists, welfare charities, writers, health professionals and other members of the public. It seems that there has been a need for something like this. It is a way to channel our anger and fear into something positive and proactive. Often we feel powerless and unable to fight back and I believe that Disability Rebellion provides that channel through which we can fight back and empower each other to do so.

    Disabled people are ‘here’ and will be ‘seen and heard’ by the DWP

    Under the surface, this has been a rebellion brewing for a long time. Ahead of the DWP announcement, the corporate media had been leaking and speculating over the government’s plans. This of course, as the Canary has been pointing out, was all about exploiting the uncertainty and disabled people’s fears for clicks and resulting ad revenue.

    Amid this shitstorm of right-wing press and political maneuvering, Atlanta was already connecting with communities online. She detailed that:

    I have spoken to many disabled people and carers over the last few months who are angry and afraid for their futures. People who join this movement are tired and frustrated. We’ve had enough of being treated as less than human, as if we don’t count because we’re not seen as productive because many of us are unable to work. Disabled people are subjected to so much abuse – especially online – no doubt driven by the government’s anti-disabled rhetoric which is magnified by mainstream media. After 14 years of hell for disabled people under the Tories, we are being forced to endure it for much longer under the Labour government. It feels like a betrayal, because the Labour Party is meant to represent the working class – which includes disabled people too. We feel like our lives don’t count because many of us aren’t “working people”. So we want to get together to rebel against the ableism, hate and benefits cuts.

    Ultimately, Atlanta expressed that Disability Rebellion will be a force for amplifying chronically ill and disabled people:

    All too often, disabled voices are being drowned out by a government and mainstream media hostile towards disabled people. We must fight this rising tide of hate.

    We want to be heard, because it is difficult to be heard and seen by society. I often get that feeling the the government and some members of society would rather we were not seen and not heard. It feels like they want to pretend we do not exist. We want to say we’re here and we’re not going away, and we will be seen and heard.

    While it’s early days, it’s clear Disability Rebellion plans to pull no punches, in punching up against the government, media, and far-right forces trying to destroy disabled communities in the UK. Needless to say, there could not be a more crucial time for an online community like this.

    You can join Disability Rebellion on X here, or on Facebook here.

    Featured image supplied

    By Hannah Sharland

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • The Met Police have made more arrests, and complicit members of the public shown further aggression towards Youth Demand protesters continuing to boldly take action across London against Israel’s ongoing genocide.

    However, Youth Demand shows no signs of slowing down. Ahead of an action to call out the BBC for its blatant pro-Israel bias, activists were once again disrupting major roads around the capital.

    Youth Demand out again despite state aggression and repression

    On Tuesday 15 April, Youth Demand activists turned out in number to grind London to a halt once more.

    At around 9.30am, around 50 Youth Demand supporters, in two teams, stepped onto the road at South Kensington, and Victoria Street near Westminster Cathedral:

    Youth Demand activists with a Palestine flag and banners block the road to oncoming traffic.

    Youth Demand activists stand in a line in front of cars, holding banners with the group's logo and "Stop arming Israel" and "Make the rich pay".

    At South Kensington, public hostility to the protesters was once again palpable. Notably, despite being on the road for only six minutes, members of the public made multiple assaults on the activists.

    A white male passerby confronts Youth Demand protesters, who are stood blocking traffic.

    As the Canary has been documenting, this has become an increasing occurrence at public protests. Youth Demand protesters alone have been subjected to numerous assaults – many within the last week alone.

    The team at Victoria left the road after 10 minutes.

    The teams regrouped and then entered the road once more at Westminster Abbey and Warren Street at around 10.50am:

    protesters, some wearing keffiyehs, stand in a line with orange banners blocking oncoming traffic. One holds up a Palestine flag.

    Once more, the team at Westminster Abbey left the road after 10 minutes. This was due to further significant aggression from the public. Similarly, the team at Warren Street left the road after 5 minutes. During this time, a passerby stole a phone from someone filming the action and proceeded to delete footage from it.

    One of those taking action was Gannon Rice, a 20 year-old student, who said:

    How much longer will we prioritise the right to individual accumulation over the lives of human beings? How long are we prepared, as a society, to sit and watch our leaders facilitate the mass murder of children? People say if you want change – vote. Well the UK has recently seen a change of government and things are worse than ever. In that scenario history shows us that the only leverage we have as ordinary people is through nonviolent disruptive action. We are told individuals can’t make a difference to enact change, but with many of us together we can make a difference. Join us at youthdemand.org.

    Youth Demand gearing up to take it to the BBC’s front door

    As the Canary previously reported, on Saturday, cops nicked eight Youth Demand protesters across multiple sites in London. It marked yet further state repression, police forces have deployed utilising the Tories draconian anti-protest laws. However, Youth Demand has only rightly seen this as a sign its tactics are working – because it’s clearly rattling the government powers-that-be and its violent enforcement apparatus. As one Youth Demand Instagram post poignantly put it:

    the state is afraid of the power of the people who refuse to be complicit in this genocide.

    So, Youth Demand have upped the ante, with further disruptions.

    On Monday, the Met also arrested four Youth Demand supporters. Significantly, this was after they had left the road, obeying police instructions to move. They were arrested for breach of Section 7 of the Public Order Act, public nuisance and willful obstruction of the highway:

     

    View this post on Instagram

     

    A post shared by Youth Demand (@_youthdemand)

    All have been bailed to leave London. That brings the total number of arrests since Saturday to 12.

    Tonight at 6.30pm, Youth Demand will be hosting a rally with other Palestinian solidarity groups outside BBC Broadcasting house, Portland Place. Crucially, together, the groups will call out the broadcaster for its kowtowing to the political establishment status quo.

    In particular, the BBC has been little more than a servile mouthpiece for Israeli propaganda. Throughout the genocide, it has propped up the war criminal and apartheid regime and its co-conspirators in the British government with unfettered and blatant bias.

    So, Youth Demand and pro-Palestine groups are right to target it for its shameful complicity.

    ‘We will not permit our leaders to be complicit’

    Today’s actions come as the death toll in Gaza rises to over 51,000 Palestinians confirmed dead. Meanwhile, Israel has wounded 116,274 throughout its abhorrent genocide. The government media office in Gaza has updated its death toll to more than 61,700, saying thousands of people missing under the rubble are presumed dead. All the while, Israeli authorities have blocked the entry of all humanitarian aid to Gaza’s 2.3 million people since early March.

    A Youth Demand spokesperson said:

    Out of the over 51,000 Palestinians dead, 17,400 were children, 1720 of them under 2 years old. Half of the remaining 2.3 million people in Gaza are children. Meanwhile, the UK government continues to actively support this genocide, allowing the British military to provide logistics and reconnaissance for Israel, whilst 15% of every F35 fighter jet dropping bombs on Gaza has been made by British industry. We will not permit our leaders to be complicit with war crimes and crimes against humanity. We need a total trade embargo with Israel right now.

    Sign up to take action at youthdemand.org.

    Featured image supplied

    By Hannah Sharland

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • At a fundraising gala, a charity peddled so-called ‘therapies’ forcing compliance, denying autonomy, and “grooming” children to suppress their behaviours and inner selves. Adults have been bullying children, and even violently restraining them in schools. Parents have forced dangerous bleach-based ‘cures’ on kids. This isn’t the far-removed reality of some distant, disgraceful UK times past. No, this is the shameful situation for Autistic adults and children in the UK today. Enter: Autistic Inclusive Meets (AIM) – a grassroots community group that’s been taking on the obscenely persisting ‘cure culture’ that still disgustingly pervades every nook and cranny of the nation’s consciousness around neurodivergence.

    For over a decade, the non-profit has exposed and battled the unconscionable abuse meted out against Autistic people countrywide.

    The Canary spoke to AIM CEO Emma Dalmayne about its work, and the ongoing menagerie of indefensible issues still affecting Autistic people today.

    Autistic Inclusive Meets: a grassroots group by Autistic people, for Autistic people

    Autistic Inclusive Meets (AIM) is a grassroots group that Emma co-founded in 2016. Officially, Emma and then co-director Paul Wady registered it in 2017. Its website describes how it’s staffed by:

    a team of passionate and dedicated volunteers, committed to creating a supportive and inclusive environment for autistic individuals and their families. Our team consists of a diverse group of autistic individuals who are devoted to helping autistic people to live fulfilling lives. We provide a range of services and support, including information, advice, and practical assistance to help autistic people navigate the challenges of everyday life.

    Emma is Autistic herself and her six children are all neurodivergent. She explained to the Canary that she’d started AIM in response to her Autistic youngest son, who’s now 17, getting bullied at school. The school had also been highly non-accommodating, to the point she’d decided to pull him out from mainstream education.

    She’d begun by taking him to various home education groups instead. However, she had found that she hadn’t been able to:

    find one that was as accepting of autistic children as they should be. The kids are still just as cruel.

    That’s where AIM came in:

    So I started AIM along with another home educator who’s not on board anymore. And we started off with one group, which was a sensory based group. It’s probably one of our most popular. We still run it.

    AIM now runs numerous social, play, and activity groups for neurodivergent adults and children alike. There’s a Saturday term-time football session, boxing, sensory groups, alongside special educational needs (SEN) advice drop-ins throughout the week:

    Children in a line across a goal, with a football each at their feet.

    Child and adult boxing.

    Moreover, Emma emphasised that the groups accept children without diagnosis – acknowledging the enormous barriers that persist to getting them. By contrast, she highlighted that:

    a lot of places don’t, like the National Autistic Society don’t, for instance.

    Autistic Inclusive Meets groups: a safe place for Autistic people to flourish

    This affirming, supportive environment for connection has served as a safe space for neurodivergent children to flourish in ways they often find hard elsewhere. Emma described how Autistic Inclusive Meets (AIM) has welcomed:

    parents bringing kids that they’re not sure about. But as soon as they get them there and their kid goes, they’re like, ‘oh, they go and play away from me’. And I’m like, ‘yeah, because they’re with other Autistic kids and they feel comfortable’.

    She told the Canary that:

    I think it’s important that we do exist for that, because there’s a lot of home ed groups who are still mainstream kids. So they’re still going to be as judgmental of anyone who they judge as different to them.

    So we’ve got children that are non-speaking. We’ve got children that communicate with AAC devices or they use signing, or they’re highly verbal, and they all just accept each other. They all just play alongside each other or with each other.

    But there’s never any judgment or bullying. We don’t tolerate any of that. And the parents, once they start coming, they all realise that they’re Autistic as well.

    Children play with animal figurines.

    Overall, for Emma, the groups are central to AIM’s work. Largely, this is because Autistic abuse is alarmingly prolific across the board. Only on 9 April did the BBC break a horrific account – with harrowing video evidence – of staff at a specialist school tackling and pinning a 12 year-old Autistic boy to the ground.

    But this disgusting overreach of restraint in education settings – abuse by any other name – is hardly uncommon. In 2023 for instance, the International Coalition Against Restraint and Seclusion surveyed the experiences of 560 children across England’s schools. Disturbingly, 87% of them had been subjected to restrictive practices – and 81% of those were Autistic.

    Emma detailed how she has had many parents phone up seeking help for their neurodivergent children experiencing abuse in schools:

    We had one child who’d been kicked twice between the legs so badly that he needed two operations. And the school defended the bullies by saying he shouldn’t have been in that part of the school. You get a lot of gaslighting from schools. You know, the child will say ‘he bullied me’ and they’ll be told, ‘oh, no, forget it, it’s fine’.

    Fighting Autistic abuse on all fronts, including from the National Autistic Society

    Some of these atrocious abuse incidents have even been at schools and residencies that a prominent UK autism organisation runs.

    In 2022, the National Autistic Society (NAS) was embroiled in a number of damning allegations surrounding serious safeguarding issues at its independent and academy-run schools. As Third Sector reported at the time:

    The government is investigating safety at schools run by the National Autistic Society after claims that a child was found eating a dead rat and a teacher brought in a sword…Other alleged incidents included staff being threatened with bottles and scissors.

    Moreover, the disgraceful abuse and severe neglect in this case chimed with previous incidents at NAS-run sites. Only in 2018, the infamous bullying and physical violence situation at the NAS’s Mendip House in Somerset came to light in a scathing report. As the Guardian reported, the Somerset Safeguarding Adults Board (SSAB) had detailed how:

    A whistleblower claimed one resident of Mendip House was slapped, forced to eat chillies and repeatedly thrown into a swimming pool.

    In another incident highlighted in the report, a staff member is said to have put a ribbon around a resident’s neck and ridden him “like a horse”. Concerns about a “laddish” culture were raised.

    When the home was investigated, inspectors found residents had been funding staff meals during outings and almost £10,000 had to be reimbursed.

    However, watchdog and regulator the Care Quality Commission (CQC) all but let the multi-million pound charity completely off the hook for it. Instead of prosecution, the CQC issued the NAS a mere £4,000 fixed penalty notice – and did nothing further. Of course, this is the epitome of the dismissive, dehumanising, and ableist attitude towards Autistic people that Emma was highlighting. There’s a sense in this that Autistic people’s lives are somehow lesser. Their word on events is consistently invalidated because they’re Autistic, and their lived experiences so frequently discounted.

    Unsurprisingly, it was Emma and Autistic Inclusive Meets (AIM) on the scene spearheading calls for justice in the wake of the scandal.

    Undercover investigations expose dangerous ‘cure’ culture in UK parent circles

    Emma has been at the forefront of fighting Autistic abuse since 2015. Before Autistic Inclusive Meets (AIM) came into being, appalled at the sorts of mistreatment she was witnessing in parent circles, Emma was already taking action.

    She explained to the Canary how she would “go undercover in Facebook groups” to expose parents mistreating their Autistic children. Emma reeled off a list of horrific ‘cures’ that she had found parents were forcing on them.

    There was the abhorrent ‘Miracle Mineral Solution’ – chlorine dioxide – essentially bleach, that parents would inject into their children’s rectum to remove supposed parasites ‘causing’ Autism. This highly dangerous practice causes children to eject their stomach and bowel lining – the ‘parasites’ as parents would claim to Emma on Facebook groups which they’d sickeningly “brag” they had “caught that day”.

    Emma recounted how she would:

    talk to parents who are using chlorine dioxide bleach in enemas and oral solutions on their autistic kids. And then I’d be talking to them arranging a coffee date and saying, ‘oh, yeah, my child has this reaction’, while getting their address and phone number and calling the police and social services at the same time. And the newspapers, when I first started contacting them, didn’t even believe it was happening.

    You know, they thought I was lying. But I’ve reported 12 sets of parents here in the UK for using chlorine dioxide.

    Emma often found parents completely unfazed at the disturbing array of symptoms they were bringing on in their children:

    The side effects that these kids were having, where I’d speak to parents and they’d say, ‘oh yeah, they’ve had nosebleeds, seizures, green stools, pink urine, sores, rashes, ulcers in the mouth, headaches’, just everything you can expect from being poisoned basically. They’d lose bowel lining when they were passing stools after the enemas. They’d put them in a sieve and they’d put them on a paper plate and they’d take pictures of them. They’d use a penny to show how thick they were and a ruler to show how long they were.

    This was just the tip of the iceberg however. Emma has encountered parents using turpentine on their Autistic children. In other cases, she found them turning to homeopathy, claiming any number of ‘cures’, or more baseless causes of autism:

    there was a woman who is a homeopathist and she was saying that chicken nuggets were causing autism. That was a good one.

    Others have been more sinister and alarming. Stem cell intravenous ‘treatments’ that send fluid straight into the brain, exploitative marine parks offering ‘dolphin therapy’ claiming the marine mammals sonar signals “activate brain cells”, painful Tui Na massages, these were just a few Emma highlighted she’d come across in her undercover infiltrations of parent groups online.

    In 2016, Emma had worked with the BBC to expose a Hungarian man in London – Josef Kanta – who claimed he could “kill” autism with mind training. Emma explained how his approach in her view, seemed to take influence from Scientology-type bull-baiting techniques. She explained how Kanta would:

    tell you, you have to sit still, look at him, and make no facial expression whatsoever. And then he’ll try and break you down.

    Emma had approached him feigning that she “didn’t want to be Autistic anymore”, so he would reveal his cruel ‘treatment’ to the undercover BBC team. She told the Canary how he had:

    threatened to hit the undercover journo in the BBC. He offered to punch him in the end because he wasn’t reacting the way you needed him to.

    Concerningly, Emma noted how he is “still active” today.

    Still no legislation to make cure claims illegal

    All her concerted work exposing abusive autism ‘cures’ culminated in Emma feeding into an important report that the cross-party Westminster Commission on Autism published in 2018. Parliamentarians, led by Labour MP Barry Sheerman put together A Spectrum of Harmful Interventions for Autism. This set out to expose the dodgy and abusive practices that persist for Autistic people in the UK. Notably, it found that:

    autistic people had been offered treatments such as crystal therapy, ear candles, vitamins, spiritual intervention, aromatherapy, chelation, juice plus diet, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, exorcism, stem-cell transplants, exposure therapy (including slapping), rerum, acupuncture, DAN (defeat autism now) therapy, MMS (bleach), turpentine and many more.

    Since this report, as Emma highlighted to the Canary, parents and quack clinicians have continued to promulgate some of these bunk, cruel, and dangerous ‘cures’ regardless.

    The problem, as Emma sees it, is that authorities continue to let the perpetrators off because:

    There’s this rhetoric of: Autism is a tragedy.

    She gave the example from her undercover investigations on parents using bleach:

    These poor, desperate parents, they’ve got these horrible Autistic children. What else are they meant to do but give them bleach? They’ll literally let them off and they’ll be back in the group the next day asking where they can buy more chlorine dioxide bleach.

    So ultimately, there’s little accountability for the abusers of Autistic individuals.

    Therefore, this has made Emma’s concerted, committed efforts to expose and bring them to justice all the more vital for the community.

    Autistic Inclusive Meets (AIM) has campaigned for years for a new law to make claiming a treatment or intervention as an autism ‘cure’, illegal. Emma explained how this would operate similar to the Cancer Act 1939 which does precisely this for cancer diseases. But, Emma laboured over a critical point here. And it’s one that shouldn’t need saying: “autism isn’t a disease”. Obviously, this underscored the fact that the Autistic community even require legislation to protect them from exploitative snake-oil salespeople, all the more appalling.

    Parliament has so far failed to bring any legislation on this. This has not been helped by the fact that the NAS as a leading autism charity has hedged on support for it.

    Ambitious About Autism’s love affair with abusive Applied Behaviour Analysis

    While on the surface, charities like the NAS purport to advocate for the Autistic community, some of the highest profile autism organisations actually peddle a particular set of these controversial therapies. Although these happen to be widely promoted therapies due to these big charities promoting them – the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) actually advises against them.

    Autistic Inclusive Meets (AIM’s) campaigning has highlighted that these nonprofits therefore haven’t only a record of bullying and neglect at their facilities, but a deeply entrenched ideological culture of abuse.

    In March, AIM picketed outside a ticketed event held by PlatformX Communications (PXC) – the trading name of TalkTalk Group – to raise funds for controversial non-profit Ambitious About Autism.

    The Canary’s Steve Topple was on the ground reporting from the protest at Raffles hotel in Westminster:

     

    View this post on Instagram

     

    A post shared by Canary (@thecanaryuk)

    There, behind closed doors, actor Christopher Eccleston hosted more than 350 attendees for a night of auctions, guest donations, and technology company sponsorship. Tickets went from £650 a pop – raising hundreds of thousands of pounds to purportedly:

    go towards improving the quality of life for autistic young people while in education by providing additional assistive technology resources to learning environments across the UK.

    However, it was this “education” work that AIM was there to challenge. Notably, AIM demonstrated outside the event because Ambitious promotes a notoriously abusive ‘therapy’ for autism.

    ABA: a therapy that sounds a lot like grooming

    Applied Behaviour Analysis (ABA) is a coercive compliance-based ‘therapy’. It relies on reinforcement techniques and punitive withholding of interests and acknowledgement. Ultimately, it’s all for ‘corrective’ goals to force Autistic patients to mask their Autistic behaviours. In effect, it abuses Autistic people into silence, and out of being themselves, forcing conformity with neurotypical conventions. Put simply: forcing compliance with societally-accepted behaviours.

    Emma expressed how in practice, ABA:

    literally is just made to break the child or adult. It really is…if you’re uncomfortable, if you’re flapping and you’re happy, and you don’t need to make eye contact, you’re made to. And it takes the autonomy away from the person.

    What’s more, Emma highlighted an alarming detail about how ABA therapists operate:

    did you know that they’re brought into the home for one week before the therapy starts? And they befriend the child. They find out what the child likes so that they can use it to motivate them and use it as a reinforcer to take away and give back.

    So, Emma pointed out what this is in essence:

    And when you’ve brought someone into your house to make friends with your child, to then make them comply with treats, doesn’t that sound like grooming?

    So, what it has meant in reality has been the outright denial of Autistic people’s autonomy. Autistic patients have come away with significant trauma, and it has heightened suicide risk, endangered patients with other sometimes co-occurring conditions, all while exposing them to potential further abuse.

    The charity has long run schools and colleges that implement ABA, alongside a similarly abusive therapy, known as Positive Behaviour Support (PBS). PBS is de facto an ABA rebrand, couched in fuzzy platitudes to a ‘person-centred’ approach. In actuality, it’s clearly anything but.

    In this way, charities like the NAS and Ambitious are not simply periphery promulgators of these abusive practices. They’re instrumental to its continued prominence – effectively mainstreaming them as therapeutic tools for Autistic people.

    If Autistic Inclusive Meets had the money the big autism organisations have…

    None of this is perhaps surprising, when you consider the fact the major autism charities are disgracefully dire on Autistic representation. And where they bother at all, it has been largely down to repeated criticism from the Autistic community – not the charities themselves taking the initiative.

    From the start, by contrast, Autistic Inclusive Meets (AIM) was Autistic-led, and entirely centred in the celebration, platforming, and uplifting of the Autistic community. Its directors are all Autistic.Its work is all about giving Autistic people a voice and opportunities to thrive as themselves.

    Yet, as Emma lamented, it’s these big charities making, at best, performative and tokenistic moves at Autistic inclusion, that are:

    making hundreds of thousands.

    In fact, it’s actually significantly worse than this. These nonprofits are raking in vast incomes in the millions. Ambitious About Autism was sitting on £21m in 2023 with a near £28m expenditure that year. Meanwhile the NAS had close to £30m by the close of 2024, after spending more than £96m.

    Emma mused to the Canary that the CEOs of some of the biggest autism organisations are also taking home staggering salaries. She pointed to the CEO of Ambitious About Autism – Jolanta Lasota – on her lavish £119k pay packet.

    Crucially, as Emma put it: “they’re profiting from abuse”. Nonetheless, the funds keep flowing. Moreover, she noted that:

    If AIM had that money, the things we’d do. We’d love to have a building. We do get to use a youth club and we also use a children’s centre. But if we had our own building, we could have a sensory room and a kitchen to teach life skills, and an outdoor area. Oh, the amount of stuff we do with that money.

    However, what Emma and the AIM team do for the community on substantially less funds is already inordinately more valuable.

    AIM in Autistic people’s corner on mental health amid Labour PIP cuts

    Autistic Inclusive Meets (AIM) has campaigned relentlessly, tirelessly for Autistic and neurodivergent people’s rights.

    In the past year, AIM put together a petition calling out Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) for “turning away autistic kids”. Emma’s son Damien bravely spoke out about his appalling exclusion from child mental health services to Sky News in March. Specifically, she explained how:

    During lockdown, his mental health deteriorated because I’ve done I’ve literally built this little world for him. So he’s got, you know, we run a football session of Chartwell Athletic Community Trust. We do boxing sessions. Anything that he wanted, I made.

    Then, when his mental health deteriorated further in 2024, his doctors referred him again. However, CAMHS still wouldn’t accept him as a patient. After suggesting he access safeguarding and children’s disability services – who obviously couldn’t help him with his mental health – Damien was forced to pay out of pocket for private therapy using his Personal Independence Payment (PIP).

    But as Emma highlighted, he shouldn’t have to. NHS services should be open and accessible to him, period.

    Evidently, this also throws up considerable irony amid the Labour Party government’s ‘reforms’ to PIP. Specifically, it’s doubling down on making the benefit entitlement harder to claim for certain disabled demographics – of which young people and those with mental health are particular targets.

    With so many parents coming to AIM with similar stories, Emma’s petition demanded that:

    CAMHS stop discriminating against mentally ill autistic children and teens. We are demanding they offer treatment and help instead of leaving vulnerable kids to suffer long term trauma.

    That petition now has nearly 215,000 signatures.

    Autistic Inclusive Meets ready to stand up for individuals where others aren’t

    These multitude of ways Autistic Inclusive Meets (AIM) is fighting abuse, and for Autistic people’s rights, is astonishing. However, it’s not even all that the grassroots group is doing either.

    AIM doesn’t only work on broader issues impacting Autistic people to embed change longer-term either. It also responds proactively to injustices in the here and now, and notably, in individual cases to boot.

    As with other major patient organisations, such as those for myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME), the mainstream Autism charities also regularly fail to deploy their immense resources to aid individuals in crisis. Not AIM: Emma and her bold, unwavering brainchild deeply committed to the community, have intervened in numerous instances.

    AIM was founded and is grounded in genuine love for the Autistic community and that has meant meeting Autistic people experiencing abuse wherever they’re at.

    The Canary’s Nicola Jeffery previously reported on a number of Autistic young women that the NHS had sectioned. Clinicians had weaponised the Mental Health Act against Saffron, Holly, and Megan. Each lives with Avoidant Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID) and doctors subjected all of them to traumatic forced treatments that failed to respect their autonomy, or accommodate their specific needs as Autistic patients. In some instances, they were even actively abusive towards them. So, naturally, Emma and AIM stepped up to support them and their families.

    Now, Emma reports how Saffron and Holly are out of hospital and both “doing well”. Holly has even since become an ambassador for AIM. Unfortunately, Megan’s case has been more complicated, so AIM is currently unaware of her situation. If the need arises however, it’s patently obvious the group will spring into action once again.

    These are hardly the only times Emma and AIM have done so either. There are so many examples, they are almost too numerous to list.

    Naturally, it was Emma who set up the petition for Osime Brown when the UK government despicably threatened to deport him to Jamaica.

    In February, AIM supported a family of an Autistic child with extreme sensory needs stuck in appropriate and dangerous temporary accommodation. The group applied pressure on Greenwich Council in London – who quickly rehoused them after their intervention.

    Currently, the group is running a campaign to make body cameras mandatory for care staff responsible for Autistic individuals. AIM launched it in direct response to night staff at a residential school in Kent violently abusing learning disabled and non-verbal Autistic teenager Jack.

    Unapologetically there for Autistic people: ‘because why shouldn’t it be like that?’

    Ultimately, Autistic Inclusive Meets (AIM’s) campaigning has underscored that the major autism charities flourish precisely because of the existence of persisting forms of abuse, not in spite of them. The narrative that Emma described positioning autism as a tragedy, is the basis through which these organisations solicit their gargantuan donations. In other words, tragedy pays: embedding genuine community, support, and dismantling discriminatory barriers, not so much.

    Emma expressed how the very basis of these organisations’ multi-million turnover rests on exploiting the Autistic community. It’s indisputably apparent that AIM could not be more different in that.

    AIM and Emma’s fervent love and dedication to the community shines through in everything they do. In July, AIM is hosting its annual Autistic Pride and Craft Fair in Woolwich, London. The group is also holding its first ever fair in Brighton that same month. The origins behind this event sum up AIM’s whole ethos in a nutshell:

    It was Autism Awareness Month, which I hate – it should be Autistic Acceptance Month – about four or five years ago, and I thought, ‘these bastards are raking in all this money’ – like the NAS. Loads of money, and they’re making it off Autistic people. And I thought what we need is a hall and let Autistic people make money for themselves. It’s £10 a table. Platform them and let them make their own money. And that’s what we did. That’s what they should be doing.

    AIM puts the Autistic community front and centre. They’re at the heart of the organisation – they’re at the heart of why it exists. For Emma, it’s a tale of two utterly different worlds when it comes to AIM and the prominent autism charities:

    There’s this thing at the moment, Walk for Autism, and people send a certain amount, they get a T-shirt and then they get sponsored, and then that money goes to the charity as well. And I always ask people who are sponsoring the NAS and all that, what has this charity done for you and your family?

    Can you phone them at midnight crying and someone actually talk to you and say, ‘you know what? We’ve got a group in two days. Come and have a cup of tea. Bring your child who you’ve been told is uncontrollable and you can’t take anywhere. And let’s see what happens’.

    With AIM, the answer is yes – you can. The group is there for the Autistic community in every way its small and under-resourced team can possibly be. It punches above its weight and then some.

    Emma put it poignantly, plainly:

    Because why shouldn’t it be like that?

    This is Emma’s unbending belief that speaking up, and speaking out, not speaking for or over, and simply being there for the Autistic community, is what Autistic advocacy should be all about. AIM’s work, from its groups to its campaigning, its activism to its platforming events, is all a testament to that.

    It’s AIM who will be there in the middle of the night in a crisis, the morning when you wake up concerned, at every moment that calls for people to stand up for Autistic community’s rights. AIM is unflinchingly there in the face of this ongoing abuse – so everyone who cares for the Autistic community should throw their full trust and support behind AIM too. There’s no disputing, it has more than earned it.

    Feature image and in-text images supplied/the Canary

    By Hannah Sharland

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • In the face of ongoing Draconian state repression, Youth Demand has successfully disrupted London once again in two acts of mass civil disobedience.

    The latest actions come amid a sweep of crackdowns in which cops have nicked protesters under the Tories’ dodgy pre-crime laws. However, clearly protesters remains undeterred – as they took two more actions across the capital.

    Youth Demand supporters have shown once more that they won’t be silenced from calling out the UK government’s disgusting complicity in Israel’s continued genocide.

    More state repression of Youth Demand activists

    First, on Saturday 12 April, Youth Demand initiated a series of swarming roadblocks.  Around 50 Youth Demand supporters blocked traffic across London. Unsurprisingly, cops clamped down and arrested eight of the activists:

    The Met nicked activists across the multiple locations Youth Demand took action. On Vauxhall Bridge, an activist defiantly shouted for a free Palestine as police escorted him into the back of a van:

    And at Elephant and Castle, a large group of cops turned up and arrested a protester despite the fact he’d already vacated the road:

    Youth Demand supporter Becky, 43, a mother of two from East London said:

    I have taken part in almost every National demo, local demo and rally since October 2023 and with the scenes we are seeing coming out of the Gaza, West Bank, Lebanon, becoming more and more deranged, criminal and heart shattering, the need to escalate to make our leaders act has never been clearer.

    We are tired of the lies, the gaslighting, watching a genocide on live-stream, while being told the real victims are the people committing the atrocities. Asking politely for those who are funding, supporting and complicit in these acts, in the way that they want us to ask them, is not working. We have to disrupt in the only way that makes them listen, to make problems for the system, that puts our bodies on the line, on the levers of power and profit.

    I am a mother of two children and I am terrified of being arrested and put on remand away from them for months on end, but this fear is what the state wants. They want us to feel like it’s easier to be apathetic and just carry on with our lives. And this fear is a tiny, tiny taste of what mothers in Palestine have lived with for 76 years. Knowing your family could be torn apart at the drop of a hat.

    I want my children to see what it looks like to do what’s right, before doing what’s comfortable. I don’t want them to live in a world where children around the world are burned in their babygrows day after day, for a year and a half, while we all look on and shrug our shoulders. If it were my children, I would want mothers, anyone, across the world to do everything in their power to try and make it stop.

    Youth Demand: no more business-as-usual in the City

    Youth Demand followed Saturday’s disruptions with more on Monday. At around 9.30am, up to 40 Youth Demand supporters in two teams stepped onto pedestrian crossings at Holborn and Southwark Bridge. There, they unfurled banners reading “Stop arming Israel” and “Make the rich pay”:

    Youth Demand activists stand in a line in front of cars, holding banners with the group's logo and "Stop arming Israel" and "Make the rich pay".

    The group of activists disrupted the traffic for approximately 20 minutes at each location.

    However, members of the public responded to the activists with violence. First, a driver tried to circumvent the protesters blocking the road. Footage shows the driver mounting the pavement and inching into a protester:

    Eventually, the protester had to move as it was clear the driver was putting her risk and would continue to drive into her if she didn’t. The driver then proceeded to drive along the pavement, where pedestrians had to move out the way.

    Then, in another instance, a member of the public violently assaulted Youth Demand activists. The clip shows a man shoving the activists onto the ground. Following this, he did the same to protesters in the way of an approaching Met police van:

    This echoes other recent Youth Demand protests. On Friday 11 April for instance, a lorry driver also attempted to drive into protesters blockading the road.

    Similarly, the assault of Youth Demand activists also isn’t the first time members of the public have done this – within the last week at that. In one previous case, a passer-by also violently shoved Youth Demand protester Zahra from behind – knocking her out and causing her to have a seizure. As a niqab-wearing Muslim woman, Zahra underscored how the assault was likely motivated by Islamophobia. Prior to that, on 8 April, another servile member of the public had assaulted activists and attempted to steal a journalist’s camera.

    Violent public: doing the bidding of the Israel-supporting elite

    So, it appears subservient citizens – backed up by a repressive state wielding far-reaching anti-protest powers – continue to feel emboldened to enact violence against Youth Demand protesters.

    Of course, it’s a damning indictment of some of the public’s mood around Gaza, and the right to protest more broadly. Israel is committing literal genocide right before the world’s eyes, with the tacit support of the UK government, and some members of the British public think Youth Demand are the problem. As the Canary’s Steve Topple previously wrote:

    They are peacefully deploying mid-level civil disobedience in the face of cataclysmic world events. Yet here in the West, agents of the state and the public still believe they can go about their daily business like nothing is happening – and that any disruption to this is disastrous.

    In a nutshell, the public who’ve attacked Youth Demand is doing the bidding of the elite. Conscious or not, they’re maintaining the violent status quo that sees the protesters calling out genocide banged up, while the perpetrators of that genocide and its complicit British political establishment handmaidens walk scott-free.

    19 year-old student Toby Ellwood from West Sussex was among those taking action:

    I am taking action with Youth Demand today because we are watching our government actively participate in the slaughter of thousands of Palestinian people. I think that we all have a duty to stand on the right side of history and disrupt and show our genocidal government that we will not be silent.

    Our government wants to keep doing business as usual and lining the pockets of their billionaire friends while our climate collapses and we watch children in Palestine be mutilated by genocidal colonisers. We have to take action because we cannot bear to watch the suffering created by the system of the bloodthirsty elites.

    Take action to stop a literal ongoing genocide

    Youth Demand’s continued actions come against a backdrop of Israel’s ongoing genocide and its forcible displacement of Palestinians in Gaza. The genocidal and apartheid state also continues to routinely dent access for aid and medical evacuations. Palm Sunday was sandwiched between its two latest actions. It was during this that Israel destroyed parts of the last remaining functioning hospital in Gaza with an airstrike. Israel has repeatedly hit hospitals in airstrikes despite the fact they are protected under international humanitarian law.

    Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz said on Saturday that Israel’s military had completely surrounded the southern Gaza city of Rafah and established a new security zone as it continues and expands an offensive in the Palestinian territory. According to the UN, Israel has designated two-thirds of Gaza “no-go” zones or placed under evacuation orders. This is since it violated the ceasefire on 18 March, resuming its genocide and campaign of ethnic cleansing. As a result, it has left 390,000 Palestinians — almost a fifth of the 2.1 million population — with no safe place to go.

    World Health Organization (WHO) chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus has warned of more disease and deaths. Notably, he has implicated Israel’s blockade of aid entering Gaza as the cause for this. More than 10,000 people need medical evacuation abroad, and at least 60,000 children are malnourished. He said Israel denied or impeded 75% of UN missions in Gaza in last week.

    Israel has persistently denied that its political leaders or military have committed war crimes during its assault on Gaza. It has killed more than 50,000 people. The UK continues to support genocide by supplying arms, whilst conducting more surveillance flights on behalf of Israel over Gaza than any other country.

    Sign up, and turn out to support Youth Demand

    Young people will not accept these crimes against humanity and we will not be led by war criminals and arsonists. We cannot allow those in power to get away with facilitating the systematic annihilation of an entire culture. It’s time to take to the streets day after day and to demand better. Only sustained mass resistance can put an end to this genocide.

    Youth Demand is therefore calling on everyone to join them.

    On Tuesday 15 April, supporters will be outside BBC Broadcasting house, Portland Place, to call out the public broadcaster’s complicity. Sign up to take action at youthdemand.org.

    As the state and public’s violent attempts to silence Youth Demand ramp up, it’s more important than ever people turn out to show unequivocally that the UK cannot continue business-as-usual while Israel’s brutality continues with impunity.

    Featured image and additional images/video via Youth Demand

    By Hannah Sharland

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • In a co-ordinated pair of actions striking at the operations in Britain of Israel’s largest weapons company, Palestine Action have shut down operations at Elbit Systems’ Leicester drone factory and are occupying Elbit’s Bristol insurers.

    Palestine Action: shitting on Elbit

    Returning to the Leicester site once again after years of occupations, blockades, and disruption, two activists have today delivered a truckload of manure and scrap furniture to the factory gates and secured themselves inside the vehicle:

    Credit Milo Chandler/Alamy Live News

    The pile of excrement and ongoing obstruction is serving to blockade the site, halting operations as all access is prevented:

    Palestine Action Elbit
    Credit Milo Chandler/Alamy Live News

    The ‘UAV Tactical Systems’ (U-TacS) plant, which is a major exporter of military drones to Israel, has thus been forced shut. The use of manure comes weeks after a similar stunt forced the closure of Elbit’s Bristol headquarters.

    In Bristol, three activists are currently occupying the headquarters of Allianz – the insurance and financial giant which is responsible for ‘Employers Liability Insurance’ for Elbit Systems UK.

    Without this insurance, Elbit’s factories – which export arms en-masse to Israel – could not operate.

    The Palestine Action campaign so far has seen dozens of Allianz’ branches struck with disruptive direct action, which seeks to raise the costs of their complicity and make it unprofitable to deal with war criminals.

    Elsewhere in Britain, Palestine Action claim responsibility for overnight damage to Aviva’s corporate offices at the Observatory building in Manchester, insurers of Elbit’s Staffordshire weapons factory, UAV Engines Ltd:

    Palestine Action Elbit
    Credit: Instagram @the_nomaad
    Credit: Instagram @the_nomaad

    And, in Rotterdam, the Netherlands chapter of the Palestine Action movement damaged and defaced the headquarters of Allianz.

    Killing Palestinians without recourse

    Elbit Systems, Israel’s largest weapons manufacturer, produces 85% of Israel’s killer drone fleet. Such drones are routinely marketed as “battle-tested” or “combat proven” as they are first tested on the Palestinian people. Despite previous denials, both export licenses and cargo shipments prove UAV Tactical Systems directly exports it’s weaponry to Israel during the current Gaza genocide.

    A spokesperson for Palestine Action has stated:

    Israel’s genocide in Gaza is continuing at full steam – and the acts of resistance in the West with demonstrated success are those which strike at the manufacture of Israel’s weapons.

    By taking on Elbit, and by taking on those facilitating its criminal enterprise, we continue to stand with the Palestinians and to undo our complicity in their killing.

    Featured image via Milo Chandler and additional images supplied

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • After climate protesters were held on remand in 2021, their friends and family decided to set up Rebels in Prison Support (RIPS), to help others who find themselves locked up, often with no idea of how to navigate the prison system.

    Rebels In Prison Support: defending the defenders

    Originally aiming to support climate prisoners and starting off with just a crowdfunder to raise money, the group is now happy to provide vital support to any peaceful protester or non- violent activist who ends up in prison.

    Rebels In Prison Support (RIPS) defines peaceful/non-violent as: ‘not causing harm to any human or animal’, and has so far assisted a total of 173 political prisoners, preparing and supporting them both practically and emotionally, and trying to make their experience in prison as comfortable as possible.

    RIPS has supported activists from a wide range of organisations, including Palestine Action, Insulate Britain, Just Stop Oil, Animal Rising, and Extinction Rebellion. This includes the 31 peaceful protesters and non-violent activists – who are currently in prisons across the country, including someone from Scottish campaign group This Is Rigged, and Daniel Day who climbed Big Ben in solidarity with Palestine and has been remanded in custody until his next hearing on Monday 14 April.

    The biggest group is currently in Europe’s largest women’s jail known as HMP Bronzefield, in Surrey, where mental health services are ‘in their worst state for 15 years’, and the number of self-harm incidents average almost 210 each month.

    Solidarity: one of the most important things

    Louis Marwen has been volunteering with Rebels In Prison Support (RIPS) for the last two years, since he found himself unexpectedly thrown into the role of support person for his friend who was on remand. The experience made him aware of the benefits solidarity can provide for those who find themselves behind bars and led him to take on support roles for several other prisoners and become more and more involved with RIPS. He is now part of the core team, which coordinates a wider network of buddies and helpers.

    Marwen explains that:

    While there are physical things we can obviously help with, solidarity could be one of the most important things. When you go into prison, you don’t know anyone, you might not have been expecting it. It might have been very sudden, if you’ve just done an action or been arrested unexpectedly and having someone there makes you feel so much better.

    Even though you’re on your own in that prison, knowing people are thinking of you and are there to support you, makes you realise you’re not on your own. I think it really makes a difference. Also, having people on the outside, that if something isn’t going right when you are in prison, can really help. You know people are watching and are always willing to help. You’re not on your own.

    RIPS makes sure they are there to support a prisoner throughout the process. Pre-prison assistance includes ‘Preparing for Prison’ briefings, which aim to get a person ready both practically and psychologically for their time behind bars.

    Sometimes people are also paired up with a buddy before they go to prison, rather than when they are already inside, so they can get to know their supporting person and have everything in place before getting arrested. The buddy helps the prisoner in many ways including forwarding messages of support and helping their family and friends at what is often a very emotional time for them.

    Although most people organise their own buddy – usually someone they know who takes part in one of the RIPS trainings – there is also a list of support people who are trained up and understand the system who can be messaged and potentially allocated to a prisoner, if needed.

    Far-reaching benefits of Rebels In Prison Support

    In-prison support includes a support team which coordinates printing and postage, sending out a relevant weekly newsletter to the prisoner, and a weekly goodies package, if wanted – which includes jokes, poems, artwork, and puzzles. Prisoners also receive a lot of one-to-one support if needed.

    When it comes to being on remand, the uncertainty around length of imprisonment can cause added distress and is made worse by limited prison resources. Hannah Schafer, 61, was supported by Rebels In Prison Support (RIPS) last year when she spent a month in prison on remand, after taking part in an action with Just Stop Oil.

    She tells the Canary that RIPS support can have far reaching benefits.

    RIPS helped me in many ways. One of them was financially; by transferring funds into my prison account so I could buy phone credit and extra food. This meant I was able to help out other prisoners who weren’t so lucky as to have private funds to spend.

    The criminal justice system is brutal, and anything but just, to many people who get caught up in it. By providing support to protest related prisoners, RIPS helps flag up some of this injustice and hopefully will benefit all prisoners in the long run. I am expecting to return to prison next month, for an extended stay, and am very grateful to know RIPS are there.

    Marwen says that RIPS are there to make sure everything is OK and are ready to help with any issues that may arise:

    A lot of our prisoners are vegan, or sometimes halal. Prisons are generally pretty bad at meeting nutritional needs anyway, but if you’re vegan it’s even worse. Prisoners might also need us to get their medication, or to contact prison lawyers, or their solicitors.

    Sometimes, if the prison doesn’t cooperate, we need to get a lot of people to phone in or email, to tell the prison that they are concerned about the prisoner because, generally, if you’re annoying, they often tend to listen more.

    This has been confirmed by an ex-prisoner, who wishes to remain anonymous, but told the Canary that it is possible their life was saved because of one of RIPS phone campaigns:

    There is every chance RIPS saved my life. My leg swelled up, a friend who is a retired GP visited me when I was in prison and said she thought it was a Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT), which can be fatal if left untreated.

    The prison wasn’t taking this seriously, despite my friend ringing up the prison and explaining she is a qualified medical professional. RIPS put a call-out for people to ring the prison, and 100 phone calls later, and within 30 minutes, I had a nurse in my cell.

    They took blood tests and then, a few days later, I was escorted to hospital, where they suspected DVT (confirmed by a hospital appointment the next day), so they prescribed me blood thinners. People die in prison due to precisely this lack of healthcare, and I was fortunate enough to have enough people outside of prison who cared enough to make a nuisance of themselves. The healthcare you can access in prison though shouldn’t be dependent on who you know.

    Support on release

    RIPS also provides support to those coming out of prison and, according to Marwen, this is the time when people can not only feel as though they have much less support, but are also much lonelier, especially if they are on licence and have certain conditions attached to their release, such as not being allowed to speak with other people from activist groups:

    There’s a lot of things that can be complicated to work out after someone gets out of prison, so we ask that their buddy carry on supporting them if possible, and if that’s not possible we try and find someone who lives nearby, who can physically go see them and support them in that way.

    We also help them to find a therapist if they need psychological support, while our PO box address allows people to still send letters to us, which we pass on to people once they are out of prison. RIPS also hold group chats for people who have been released, where they can talk with, and ask questions to, people with similar experiences as themselves.

    Around the world, people are calling for change, but the injustices continue unabated. Here in the UK, dissent is being criminalised, and powers are being misused by an increasingly authoritarian government. This means that people who act on their conscience are increasingly finding themselves behind bars for non-violent activism and peaceful protest, something which should be considered unacceptable in a democracy.

    Rebels In Prison Support: solidarity, not charity

    Marwen said:

    The numbers have been steadily increasing over the years. Back at the end of 2021 into 2022, there was an Insulate Britain campaign and although people were getting arrested all the time, there weren’t many court cases.

    Things weren’t that bad with the first Just Stop Oil campaign either, or even Palestine Action a few years ago. Whereas now it’s not even convictions, but about people being remanded for a really long time, even though they’re only meant to be held for eight months, or less. We had someone from Just Stop Oil, who was part of the Manchester 5, who was remanded in prison for six months before being found not guilty.

    The rest of them are still being held in prison until their sentencing in May- so by then they would have been in prison for nine months (because they have been found guilty of conspiracy to commit a public nuisance). This just did not used to happen.

    RIPS now also advises everyone taking action with Just Stop Oil or Palestine Action to come along to their Preparing For Prison briefings, as there is a high chance of arrest.

    Anyone wanting to get involved in any way with the important work of Rebels in Prison Support, or wanting more information, can make contact at rebelsinprison@gmail.com

    • Consider donating to the RIPS fundraiser. RIPS has a lot of outgoings and appreciates any contributions, no matter how small.
    • Create content to send to those in prison, such as articles, puzzles, poems, exercises.
    • Forward emails to prisoners via emailaprisoner.com and be in close communication with each prisoner’s support team.
    • Write messages of support to prisoners- the emails are found by clicking onto the prisoner boxes here.
    • Write to post- prisoners, using RIPS PO Box address, available from their email address
    • Organise a writing group, and regularly write to activists who are in prison.
    • Take part in a RIPS training, to learn how to become a prison buddy.
    • Help to maintain the RIPS website
    • Go to https://rebelsinprison.uk/ for more information.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By Charlie Jaay

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Nigerian hip-hop veteran and activist Eedris Abdulkareem has struck out at the Nigerian government for censoring his music. The move by the state’s broadcasting department has shone light on the increasingly repressive environment in the country under the steer of APC president Bola Ahmed Tinubu.

    Eedris Abdulkareem: state tries to silence political single

    In a move to silence his latest politically-charged single, Tell Your Papa, Nigeria’s National Broadcasting Commission implemented a ban. A memo it dated April 9 2025 classified the song as “Not To Be Broadcast (NTBB)”. The NBC cited a regulation under Section 3.1.8 of the Nigeria Broadcasting Code, which prohibits content it considers offensive.

    Coordinating director of broadcast monitoring at the NBC Susan Obi signed the directive. Subsequently, the NBC circulated this to radio and television stations across Nigeria. This effectively prevented mainstream media outlets from airing the track.

    Eedris Abdulkareem is a renowned and fearless activist through his music. A previous administration had attempted to censor him before. This was for his 2004 hit song Jaga Jaga. During president Olusegun Obasanjo’s administration, the government also banned this due to its scathing critique of Nigeria’s leadership. That song has since become emblematic of resistance and political awareness among Nigeria’s youth.

    Tell Your Papa: no more ‘grovelling for crumbs’ from the ‘paymaster’s table’

    The single Tell Your Papa addresses critical issues, such as the escalating economic hardship, increasing poverty, and what Eedris Abdulkareem characterises as unchecked government excesses since president Tinubu assumed office in May 2023.

    Tell Your Papa’s music video is viewable on YouTube:

    Eedris  Abdulkareem remarked that:

    Just under two years of his presidency and the results are frighteningly abysmal from all fronts.

    He added:

    This is a fact known by all Nigerians, irrespective of religion, tribe or political affiliation – except for the few happy slaves grovelling for crumbs from their paymaster’s table.

    Taking president Tinubu to task: criticism a crime in Nigeria?

    In response to the ban, Eedris Abdulkareem accused the Tinubu administration of showing intolerance towards dissent and attempting to stifle the truth. He stated that:

    It’s obvious that in Nigeria, truth and constructive criticism is always deemed a big crime by the government.

    Further to this, he condemned the government, asserting:

    This present government, led by President Bola Tinubu, is now going on record as one of the most insensitive, vindictive and grossly maleficent administrations ever to preside over the affairs of Nigeria.

    Reflecting on the ongoing challenges in Nigeria, Abdulkareem questioned:

    Any wonder why Nigeria hasn’t made impactful strides all these years?

    He concluded with the statement:

    The conscience is an open wound – only the truth can heal it.

    The controversy surrounding Tell Your Papa underscores ongoing tensions between artists and government authorities in Nigeria, particularly regarding freedom of expression in the face of political criticism.

    Feature image via Youtube – Abdulkareem Eedris

    By Steve Topple

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Once again, cops have been arrested Youth Demand supporters under dodgy pre-crime laws introduced by the Tories. On the flip side, it shows that the group has clearly got the British state worried – and good job it has.

    Youth Demand: swarming and causing a ‘public nuisance’

    Youth Demand supporters gathered at Russell Square on Saturday 12 April to take part in ‘open swarming’. The group are calling for the UK government to impose a total trade embargo on Israel, and make the super rich and fossil fuel elite pay damages to communities and countries most harmed by fossil fuel burning.

    Around 50 Youth Demand supporters stepped into the road at Elephant and Castle with banners and smoke flares at approximately 12:45pm:

    Youth Demand

    The group left the road at around 1:20pm.

    One supporter was arrested for breach of Section 7 of the Public Order Act, after having already left the road. A further group of around 26 disrupted Hyde Park Corner at around 1:55pm for approximately 15 minutes, with supporters dispersing when requested by police.

    The groups converged and disrupted Vauxhall Bridge north crossing at 2:30pm:

    Youth Demand

    Shockingly, a further seven supporters were arrested at around 2:50pm as the group left the road. As Youth Demand put on its Insta, three of these were after the event. Cops arrested them for suspected ‘conspiracy to cause a public nuisance’. This is the same offence that police have used to arrest other Youth Demand supporters in recent weeks.

    The real public nuisance is Starmer

    One of those arrested was co-founder Sam. He said:

    The real public nuisance is Starmer who is licensing arms sales to Israel to drop bombs on kids. They are also allowing fossil fuels meaning that billions of people will be starved to death in the coming decades.

    The only way we can change this is by being in civil resistance. We need everyone to sign up at youthdemand.org. This is the only way to stop the mass genocide.

     

    View this post on Instagram

     

    A post shared by Youth Demand (@_youthdemand)

    Saturday’s actions come against a backdrop of Israel’s ongoing killing and forcible displacement of Palestinians in Gaza, coupled with the routine denial of access for aid and of medical evacuations.

    Israel’s defence minister has said it will expand its so-called “security zones” in Gaza to include the southern city of Rafah. According to the UN two-thirds of Gaza has been designated as “no-go” zones or placed under evacuation orders since Israel resumed its offensive against Hamas on 18 March following the collapse of a two-month ceasefire. This has left 390,000 Palestinians — almost a fifth of the 2.1 million population — with no safe place to go.

    World Health Organization (WHO) chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus has warned of more disease and deaths due to Israel’s blockade of aid entering Gaza where more than 10,000 people need medical evacuation abroad and at least 60,000 children are malnourished. He said 75% of UN missions in Gaza last week were denied or impeded.

    Youth Demand: Israel is a menace

    Israel has persistently denied that its political leaders or military have committed war crimes during its assault on Gaza, in which it has killed more than 50,000 people, most of them civilians. The UK continues to support genocide by supplying arms, whilst conducting more surveillance flights on behalf of Israel over Gaza than any other country.

    A Youth Demand spokesperson said:

    We’ve tried the marches, petitions and rallies for over a year and a half now. It hasn’t worked. The government only cares about disruption. That’s why we are shutting London down day after day. There is no time to lose, two million Palestinians are starving. They are being pushed into smaller and smaller death zones in Gaza. Business-as-usual enables this genocide, so we have a duty to shut it down.

    We must resist.

    Unfortunately for the cops and the state – but fortunately for anyone with an ounce of moral fibre – Youth Demand will be continuing its actions next week.

    Featured image and additional images supplied

    By Steve Topple

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Tibetan Youth Congress activists protested outside the Chinese Embassy in New Delhi on Friday following the death of revered Tibetan religious leader Tulku Hungkar Dorje while in custody in Vietnam.

    In Dharamsala, dozens of Tibetan devotees marched in the streets for a candlelight prayer and vigil.

    Policemen detain exiled Tibetans protesting against the death of Tulku Hungkar Dorje, a revered Tibetan religious leader, while in custody in Vietnam, outside Chinese embassy in New Delhi, India, April 11, 2025.
    Policemen detain exiled Tibetans protesting against the death of Tulku Hungkar Dorje, a revered Tibetan religious leader, while in custody in Vietnam, outside Chinese embassy in New Delhi, India, April 11, 2025.
    (Manish Swarup/AP)

    The Tibetan government-in-exile called Tuesday for an independent investigation into the death.

    Human rights groups contend that Tulku Hungkar Dorje was arrested from his hotel room in Ho Chi Minh City in a joint operation by local police and Chinese government agents. He was reportedly transferred to Chinese custody where he mysteriously died the same day, they added.

    On April 3, Lung Ngon Monastery in Gade county (Gande in Chinese), Golog prefecture, Qinghai province, issued a statement confirming that its revered 56-year-old abbot, had died in Vietnam’s Ho Chi Minh City due to poor health.

    The monastery’s statement gave no further details. His followers say he had been missing for eight months.

    “I am troubled to learn of the mysterious death of Tibetan religious leader Tulku Hungkar Dorjee in Vietnam,” said U.S. Rep. Jim McGovern in a post on X.

    The Massachusetts Democrat said the State Department “must urge Vietnam to do a full and transparent independent investigation.”

    Tulku Hungkar Dorje was a renowned religious teacher, philanthropist, and educator. He disappeared in August 2025 after he called at a public teaching in July for the preservation of Tibetan language and culture.

    Chinese authorities forbid the monastery and local residents from holding public memorial services and prayers for the abbot, underscoring the sensitivity of his death, three sources from the region told Radio Free Asia on Wednesday.

    The sources requested anonymity because they feared reprisals.

    Devotees of revered Tibetan Buddhist monk Tulku Hungkar Dorjee take part in a candlelight vigil in Dharamsala, India, April 11, 2025.
    Devotees of revered Tibetan Buddhist monk Tulku Hungkar Dorjee take part in a candlelight vigil in Dharamsala, India, April 11, 2025.
    (RFA Tibetan)
    Devotees of revered Tibetan Buddhist monk Tulku Hungkar Dorjee take part in a candlelight vigil in Dharamsala, India, April 11, 2025.
    Devotees of revered Tibetan Buddhist monk Tulku Hungkar Dorjee take part in a candlelight vigil in Dharamsala, India, April 11, 2025.
    (RFA Tibetan)
    Devotees of revered Tibetan Buddhist monk Tulku Hungkar Dorjee take part in a candlelight vigil in Dharamsala, India, April 11, 2025.
    Devotees of revered Tibetan Buddhist monk Tulku Hungkar Dorjee take part in a candlelight vigil in Dharamsala, India, April 11, 2025.
    (RFA Tibetan)


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by RFA Staff.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • In response to a reported 3,500 barrels of oil spilling from the Keystone pipeline this week in North Dakota, Sushma Raman, Interim Executive Director of Greenpeace USA, said:

    “We know fossil fuels are unhealthy at every stage of their life-cycle. There is no failsafe way to transport oil and gas, and the risks unfairly fall on the people who live near the route, while the company reaps the benefits. The Keystone spill – the latest in a long history of spills – shows exactly why we need to protect protest, free speech, and the right to speak up against harm. Everyday people, public watchdogs, and advocacy groups have a right to raise their voices and criticize a corporation when their health and livelihoods are on the line.

    “Yet this type of ordinary advocacy is exactly what is under attack in the more than $660M jury verdict against Greenpeace entities in a lawsuit brought by pipeline company Energy Transfer. Oil companies know that protest works – which is why they’re trying to make the stakes so high no one will be willing to take the risk,” Raman said.


    This content originally appeared on Common Dreams and was authored by Newswire Editor.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • An estimated 5 million people around the world took to the streets last weekend in the largest show of resistance yet to President Donald Trump’s return to the White House.

    The “Hands Off!” protesters expressed outrage over Elon Musk’s dismantling of federal agencies and programs through the so-called Department of Government Efficiency, the mass firing of federal workers, and attacks on the rights of immigrants and trans people. Two-thirds of attendees at the Hands Off rally in Washington, D.C. — which drew an estimated 100,000 people, according to organizers — named climate change as one of their top motivations for participating. That’s according to data from Dana Fisher, a sociologist at American University, whose team surveyed the protesters.

    The protests were peaceful, with marchers sticking to pre-approved routes and refraining from the kind of civil disobedience that can lead to arrest. That’s in contrast to the array of new tactics the climate movement has implemented in recent years, from the disruptive (blocking roads) to the just plain weird (throwing tomato soup at the glass in front of a Vincent van Gogh painting). These tactics are often unpopular, raising concerns about backlash. But there’s mounting evidence that they work — especially in tandem with more mainstream efforts.

    A new review of 50 recent studies finds that protests tend to sway media coverage and public opinion toward the climate cause, without appearing to backfire, even when disruptive tactics are used. The researchers, from the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication, found that collective action sometimes influenced elections by shifting people’s voting behavior. One study in Germany, for example, found that the Green Party received a larger portion of the vote in areas where climate protests took place.

    “People only have so much stamina and attention and will to keep fighting in the face of insurmountable odds,” said Laura Thomas-Walters, a co-author of the review and an activist with Extinction Rebellion U.K. “Let’s use it as effectively as possible.” Thomas-Walters argues that disruption should be aimed at institutions that prop up the status quo, such as banks, corporations, universities, and pension funds, in order to influence decision-makers.

    Her review found real-life evidence of the “radical flank effect,” the idea that a more extreme climate group can increase support for more mainstream groups. Two weeks after the group Just Stop Oil blocked a major road around London in November 2022, the public’s support increased for a more moderate group, Friends of the Earth, according to a study published last fall. “You know, it’s ultimately like a good-cop, bad-cop approach,” said James Ozden, a co-author of that study and the founder of the Social Change Lab in London, which conducts research on the effects of protests. 

    Last month, Just Stop Oil announced that it was ending its three-year resistance campaign, claiming it had achieved its demand of ending new oil and gas licenses in the United Kingdom. But that success came with a cost: Dozens of the group’s protesters have faced jail time. According to Fisher, who has been studying climate activism for two and a half decades, that’s not a fluke. “Activists are met with repression when their activism is starting to resonate and work,” she said.

    Photo of demonstrators holding orange balloons with skulls on them
    Just Stop Oil supporters protest outside a court building in London as activists appear in court for different actions, including spilling tomato soup on Vincent van Gogh’s “Sunflowers” painting.
    Lab Ky Mo / SOPA Images / LightRocket via Getty Images

    Climate protests might even lead to reductions in emissions, the review found, though these effects are hard to study and the evidence is still limited. For instance, parts of the U.S. with lower levels of protests during the initial Earth Day in 1970 had higher levels of air pollution 20 years later, compared to places that had better turnout. More recently, a wildly unpopular campaign called Insulate Britain, which blocked roads and demanded that the government retrofit all homes in the United Kingdom, eventually got some of what it wanted, with former Prime Minister Boris Johnson drawing up plans to insulate thousands of homes in 2022.

    There are questions, however, about how these results apply to the rapidly changing political environment in the U.S. in the nearly three months since Trump took office. “The political stakes for protest, and the risks around protest as well as the tactics that will work and won’t work, are changing quite substantially,” Fisher said.

    Organizers have recently been inspired by research that looks at efforts in other countries to counter authoritarianism, said Saul Levin, the director of campaigns and politics at the Green New Deal Network, a coalition of climate, labor, and justice organizations. He pointed to a paper from last year, which has not yet been peer-reviewed, that found that a democracy has a substantially higher chance of surviving a political push toward autocracy when there’s a strong public resistance. Based on 35 case studies in countries around the world since 1991, the authors found that there was an 8 percent chance of democracy persisting when there was no active anti-authoritarian movement, compared to a 52 percent chance when an active movement existed. 

    Through surveys of protesters, Fisher has found that climate activists want to remain peaceful, even as she’s seen an alarming increase in support for political violence among left-leaning activists generally. “I do think that it is important to remember that some of the most effective movements that we’ve seen in the United States, as well as globally, have been movements that embrace and commit to peaceful resistance,” Fisher said. “That being said, one of the reasons that those movements have been so successful is because they were met with repression and violence from the state.” In many cases, attempts to repress protests actually fuel resistance and mobilize people.

    Levin sees the pro-democracy protest movement as inseparable from the fight for climate action. The Trump administration has cut programs to protect clean air and water and respond to weather disasters. Just this week, Trump signed an executive order instructing the Department of Justice to “stop the enforcement” of state-level climate laws.

    “The whole idea of the Green New Deal,” Levin said, “was that in order to solve climate change, we need to harness the power of the federal government. They’re destroying the federal government. So inherent to the success of solving climate change is defending these institutions.”

    This story was originally published by Grist with the headline What do climate protests actually achieve? More than you think. on Apr 11, 2025.

    This post was originally published on Grist.

  •  


    Right-click here to download this episode (“Save link as…”).

     

    Intercept: Support Us Search for: Politics Justice War on Gaza Technology Environment Immigration Support Us Special Investigations Voices Podcasts Videos Documents About Contact Us More Ways to Donate Impact & Reports Join Newsletter Jobs Become a Source © THE INTERCEPT ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Terms of Use Privacy Politics Justice War on Gaza Technology Environment Immigration About Support Us Trump Appears to Be Targeting Muslim and “Non-White” Students for Deportation

    Intercept (4/8/25)

    This week on CounterSpin: We’re learning from Jonah Valdez at the Intercept that the Trump administration is now revoking visas and immigration statuses of hundreds of international students under the Student Exchange and Visitor Program—not just those active in pro-Palestinian advocacy, or those with criminal records of any sort. It is, says one immigration attorney, “a concerted effort to go after people who are from countries and religions that the Trump administration wants to get out of the country.”

    It is disheartening to see a report like one in Newsweek, about how Trump “loves the idea” of sending US citizens to prisons outside of US jurisdiction, that feels it has to start by explaining “Why It Matters.” But things as they are, we have to be grateful for what straight reporting we get—at a time when some outlets are signing on to shut up if it buys them a moment of peace, which it won’t—and a moment in which staying informed, paying attention, learning what’s happening and how we can stop it, is what we have to work with.

    Dara Lind is senior fellow at the American Immigration Council. She joins us this week on the show.

     

    Plus Janine Jackson takes a quick look back at coverage of the Hands Off! protests.


  • This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Activists with the campaign group Youth Demand were met with violence and abuse from members of the public on Friday 11 April, as they staged a peaceful protest in central London to draw attention to Israel’s ongoing genocide in Gaza. At one point, a lorry driver could be seen accelerating his vehicle directly into activists – until the police finally intervened.

    So, in the face of this repression – what does the Telegraph do? Poke fun at Youth Demand and side with the abusive public (and of course, Israel).

    Youth Demand facing increasing aggression

    Activists, who temporarily blocked traffic in Moorgate at Farringdon Road and Fenchurch Street,, were pelted with eggs by bystanders in a disturbing show of public aggression:

    It seems odd that passers by in the middle of the City of London would be carrying enough eggs just to do this on the spur of the moment. As the Canary previously reported, earlier Youth Demand actions this month were targeted by the organised far-right and Zionists.

    The protest was part of a sustained campaign by Youth Demand, a growing youth-led movement calling for the UK government to end arms sales to Israel and to take meaningful action against what they rightfully term a genocidal war on the people of Gaza. Demonstrators also demanded that MPs cease taking donations from pro-Israel lobby groups.

    At one point on 11 April, a lorry driver was filmed trying to run over Youth Demand supporters:

     

    View this post on Instagram

     

    A post shared by Youth Demand (@_youthdemand)

    This is not the first time the public have assaulted Youth Demand supporters. As the Canary previously reported, just yesterday a bystander attacked a non-violent activist, knocking her out and causing her to have two seizures.

    MSM complicity with genocide

    However, rather than addressing the substance of the protest—the UK’s complicity in Israel’s military actions—the Telegraph chose to mock the young campaigners, dismissively likening them to “Just Stop Oil 2.0” and focusing disproportionately on traffic delays.

    This tone reflects a broader media trend of minimising or obscuring the devastating human cost of Israel’s military operations in Gaza.

    At the time of writing, Israel has killed more than 50,000 people in Gaza since October 2023. This includes over 15,000 children, a harrowing statistic that is too often left unmentioned in mainstream UK media coverage.

    Yet, instead of engaging with these shocking figures or the evidence of war crimes—including the targeting of civilian infrastructure, hospitals, and journalists—outlets like the Telegraph continue to centre discomfort to commuters over the mass deaths of civilians.

    Youth Demand: courage in the face of repression

    Youth Demand’s actions are part of a proud tradition of nonviolent civil disobedience. Faced with a government that has shown little inclination to act, and a media environment more concerned with demonising dissent and propping up Israel than reporting on mass atrocities, these young activists are stepping into the moral vacuum.

    Their bravery contrasts starkly with the response of those who assaulted them, egging young people for daring to care about a genocide. Such hostility—enabled and amplified by an irresponsible press—is a reminder of the steep social cost activists face for standing on the right side of history.

    As Israeli bombs continue to fall on Gaza, and as the death toll rises daily, the actions of Youth Demand should not be ridiculed—they should be applauded.

    Rather than throwing eggs, we should be throwing our weight behind their urgent call for justice.

    Featured image and additional images supplied

    By Steve Topple

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Seg3 microsoft protest 1

    Microsoft fired two workers who protested the company’s ties to Israel’s assault on Gaza at its 50th anniversary celebration last Friday. The workers protested after leaked documents revealed that Microsoft supplies the Israeli military with AI and cloud technology, as well as an Air Force unit known as the Ofek, to build “kill lists.” “We wanted everyone to know that Microsoft’s cloud and AI are the bombs and bullets of the 21st century,” says Vaniya Agrawal, No Azure for Apartheid organizer and a former Microsoft employee who was fired after disrupting an April 4 discussion between current and former Microsoft CEOs, including Bill Gates.


    This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Seg3 microsoft protest 1

    Microsoft fired two workers who protested the company’s ties to Israel’s assault on Gaza at its 50th anniversary celebration last Friday. The workers protested after leaked documents revealed that Microsoft supplies the Israeli military with AI and cloud technology, as well as an Air Force unit known as the Ofek, to build “kill lists.” “We wanted everyone to know that Microsoft’s cloud and AI are the bombs and bullets of the 21st century,” says Vaniya Agrawal, No Azure for Apartheid organizer and a former Microsoft employee who was fired after disrupting an April 4 discussion between current and former Microsoft CEOs, including Bill Gates.


    This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • A Youth Demand supporter has been violently assaulted by a passer-by as she took part in non-violent action.

    She was knocked out and suffered two seizures while on a demonstration with other supporters:

    youth Demand

    The group were there to demand that the UK government impose a total trade embargo on Israel, and make the super rich and fossil fuel elite pay damages to communities and countries most harmed by fossil fuel burning.

    Youth Demand attacked by the public – again

    27 supporters of Youth Demand worked in two teams to block traffic on Buckingham Palace Road and Waterloo Road. They then unfurled banners reading ‘Youth Demand an End to Genocide’ and ‘Stop Arming Israel’, and let off smoke flares. Police arrived shortly after and issued a warning under Section 7 of the Public Order Act. Both teams left the road after approximately 15 minutes.

    The groups then combined and re-emerged at Holborn Circus where they blocked traffic again:

    Youth Demand

    The group was stood in the road facing traffic:

    This is where Zahra, 40, from Newcastle was assaulted. She said:

    We were on Holborn crossing. There was a sudden sharp pain at the back of my head, and lights out. I was knocked out and suffered two seizures. I was treated in the back of an ambulance that arrived. I feel violated, violated that someone came behind me to attack me.

    I think this was an Islamophobic incident. Because I’m visibly Islamic, I’ve got an Niqaab and an Abaya on, its easy to see I’m of faith. I will continue take action with Youth Demand – one prick won’t stop me.

    Zahra continued:

    I took direct action today as a niqab wearing Muslim woman because marches have not worked. Those of us of Islamic faith have a responsibility to support our brothers and sisters in Palestine. It is time for niqab wearing women to say stop the bombing and slaughter of innocent children. Stop arming Israel.

    None of the other action takers saw who attacked Zahra, as they were all facing in the same direction. A video clip taken shows a man shoving a group of Youth Demand supporters, leaving Zahra with a head injury.

    ‘Sickening’

    A spokesperson for Youth Demand said:

    The attack on a peaceful Youth Demand supporter today was sickening. Violent prejudice like this is driving the genocide in Gaza.

    The casual violence and ongoing cruelty we see demonstrates that the elites, politicians, and businesses have openly declared war on a civilian population.

    They continued:

    Netanyahu, who has a warrant issue for his arrest by the International Criminal Court, is freely travelling the globe while the men, women and children of Gaza are kept in an open air prison and treated as target practice by the Israeli Defence Force.

    This is what our government is complicit in, they will not protect us, when the storms of the climate crisis are on our threshold, they will not care.

    Mark Preston, a student from Cambridge at the action, said:

    I am taking action with Youth Demand today because I feel that I must.

    I have no choice but to resist the genocidal UK government, who are determined to raze Palestine to the ground, and to make our planet unliveable.

    We have a simple choice facing us today: we can comply with our genocidal government and allow them to slaughter Palestinians by the thousands, destroy our planet, and repress our right to protest, or we can resist, take power into our own hands and bring the imperial regime to its knees. I choose to resist.

    Call to action from Youth Demand

    The actions come against a backdrop of ongoing atrocities in Gaza and geopolitical uncertainty. President Macron has said that France plans to recognise a Palestinian state within months and could make the move at a UN conference in New York in June on settling the Israel-Palestinian conflict.

    Meanwhile Trump is reportedly pushing Netanyahu to end the Gaza war within weeks as part of a broader Middle East strategy that includes normalisation with Saudi Arabia.

    Israel has persistently denied that its political leaders or military have committed war crimes during its assault on Gaza, in which it has killed more than 50,000 people, most of them civilians. However, a war crimes complaint against 10 Britons who served with the Israeli military was submitted to the police this week. The UK continues to support genocide by supplying arms, whilst conducting more surveillance flights on behalf of Israel over Gaza than any other country.

    This is not the first time this week the public have attacked Youth Demand supporters. As the Canary previously reported, on 8 April at a road block a man assaulted members of Youth Demand and tried to steal a journalist’s camera. As the Canary wrote:

    Youth Demand are peacefully deploying mid-level civil disobedience in the face of cataclysmic world events. Yet here in the West, agents of the state and the public still believe they can go about their daily business like nothing is happening – and that any disruption to this is disastrous.

    Sign up to take action at youthdemand.org.

    Featured mage and additional images supplied

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Phoebe Plummer was found guilty of conspiracy at Southwark Crown Court on Wednesday 9 April, while the jury was unable to reach a verdict for her co-defendant. The pair took action with Just Stop Oil in November 2022 to demand an end to new oil and gas.

    Phoebe Plummer: guilty again

    Guido Wieser (21) and Phoebe Plummer (23) were on trial at Southwark Crown Court in front of Judge Cole in relation to their role in the actions that caused gridlock on the M25 between 7 and 10 November 2022.

    Both defendants were arrested on 10 November 2022 after a vehicle they were travelling in was stopped by police. Phoebe Plummer was held in custody for a month before being released on a three-month electronic tag in connection with the charge.

    Phoebe has been bailed until 15 May, when they will be sentenced alongside David Mann and Christopher Ford who pleaded guilty to the charges before trial.

    During the trial, the judge ruled out all legal defences that would have allowed the defendants to argue that they were exercising their rights to protest in the face of the grave threat to humanity posed by the climate crisis. The Crown Prosecution Service had previously accepted as agreed facts the findings of the 2020 Net Zero Interim report, which stated:

    Climate change is an existential threat to humanity. Without global action to limit greenhouse gas emissions, the climate will change catastrophically with almost unimaginable consequences for societies across the world.

    In their closing speech, Phoebe Plummer said:

    In the body-worn footage of my arrest, one of the things I say is that scientists predict that soon there will be one billion climate refugees globally. The latest peer reviewed science predicts that we will reach that by 2030. One billion is a number so large that I find it difficult to comprehend.

    Those people are not a number, or a statistic. They are real people, with names and faces, real people who haven’t caused this crisis, who aren’t to blame, but who are going to lose their homes, their safety, and possibly their lives. I agreed to climb a gantry in November 2022, because I thought it might have an impact that could reduce this suffering.

    Another dodgy judge presiding over a Just Stop Oil case

    Speaking before the verdict, Phoebe Plummer said:

    The courts routinely deny us the ability to justify our actions as reasonable, proportionate and necessary and tell jurors not to acquit a defendant based on their conscience, leaving little leeway to return anything but a guilty verdict. Despite this, I stand by my actions and will not be deterred from engaging in necessary acts of nonviolent civil resistance to oppose injustice.

    At one point during the trial the Judge threatened to order the arrests of anyone sitting outside the court holding placards referencing jury equity – the principle that juries can deliver verdicts based on their conscience.

    This appeared to contradict a High Court ruling by Justice Saini in the Trudi Warner case last year. However, Judge Cole later backtracked from his view, calling such a measure “too extreme”.

    In the second M25 conspiracy trial last month, six supporters were acquitted, while two—Ian Bates and Abigail Percy-Ratcliffe—were found guilty and now await sentencing. The first gantry conspiracy trial saw unprecedented custodial sentences, including five-year and four-year terms for members of the ‘Whole Truth Five’—the longest sentences in UK history for peaceful protest.

    Those sentences were partially overturned in March by the Court of Appeal, which ruled that the defendants’ conscientious motivations and article 10 and 11 rights under the ECHR had been improperly disregarded at the time of sentencing.

    Despite Phoebe Plummer’s verdict, Just Stop Oil says it “will continue to stand with those being prosecuted for peaceful resistance to fossil fuel expansion in the face of rapidly accelerating climate collapse”.

    Featured image supplied

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • A social worker and rights activist was sentenced Wednesday to three years and nine months in prison for participating in a riot during Hong Kong’s 2019 pro-democracy protests.

    Jackie Chen was one of several social workers who tried to mediate between police and demonstrators. She carried a loudspeaker and urged police to use restraint and to refrain from firing non-lethal bullets during a protest that took place on Aug. 31, 2019.

    At Wednesday’s hearing in the Hong Kong district court, three co-defendants were sentenced to two years and five months in prison after entering a guilty plea. Chen, who pleaded guilty and got the stiffer sentence, had faced up to seven years in prison.

    Police made more than 10,000 arrests during and after the 2019 protests, which began as a show of mass public anger at plans to allow the extradition of alleged criminal suspects to mainland China.

    They broadened to include demands for fully democratic elections and greater official accountability.

    Chen was acquitted in 2020, but prosecutors appealed and won a retrial in another example of the harsh stance that Hong Kong authorities have taken with political cases.

    When Chen was convicted last month, Judge May Chung wrote in her verdict that Chen used her position as a social worker to support the protesters and used the loudspeaker to shout unfounded accusations against the police.

    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by RFA Cantonese.

  • Direct action group Youth Demand has made April the month they ‘shut it down for Palestine’ in London. Rightly so, given the unprecedented scale of violence and war crimes Israel is meting out in Gaza and the Occupied Palestinian territories.

    However, Youth Demand have been met with what it calls ‘unprecedented repression’ in London – as its wildcat shut downs clearly start to rattle the state and subservient members of the public.

    Youth Demand: mashing up the capital

    As the Canary has been documenting, Youth Demand have been taking direct action in London. It’s over Israel’s ongoing genocide in Gaza, and war crimes and human rights abuses in the Occupied Palestinian Territories.

    After the now-infamous Met Police raid on a group meeting in a Quaker building, Youth Demand has been unrepentant in its resolve to shut London down. The past few days has seen the group block multiple roads:

    Youth Demand

    Youth Demand

    Members of the public were already getting rattled at this point:

     

    View this post on Instagram

     

    A post shared by Youth Demand (@_youthdemand)

    It also staged a protest outside foreign secretary David Lammy’s home address – in what the group has now dubbed ‘Silence of the Lammy’:

    However, it has been the road blocks and rallies that have been most frowned upon by the state and the public.

    Cops and the public: cracking down

    As the Canary previously reported, a rally outside Senate House Library grabbed the attention of the far right. Then, on Tuesday 8 April another rally, this time at the Ministry of Defence, saw cops nick one activist for ‘conspiracy to cause a public nuisance.

    Also on 8 April at a road block a man assaulted members of Youth Demand and tried to steal a journalist’s camera. As one social media user put it:

    This man decided it was a good idea to assault activists this morning, throwing several of them to the floor before grabbing a journalist’s camera and attempting to snatch it off his neck.

    Imagine being more angered by a 10 minute delay than 20,000 dead children.

    The repression continued on Wednesday 9 April, as another member of Youth Demand was also arrested for conspiracy to cause a public nuisance:

    In UK law, “conspiracy to cause a public nuisance” refers to an agreement between two or more people to intentionally or recklessly cause a public nuisance, which is now a statutory offense under Section 78 of the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts (PCSC) Act 2022. This replaced a previous common law offence.

    In other words, this is cops and the so-called justice system policing pre-crime: nicking people for planning to do something, rather than actually doing it. Of course, under the Tories PCSC Act this is not new.

    The state jailed the Just Stop Oil ‘Whole Truth Five’ for years for organising but not taking part in a protest. Similarly, the state used this argument against a member of Palestine Action.

    Just think about this for a minute.

    The world is ending – but think of the nuisance from Youth Demand

    The Canary has, in the past few hours, reported on Israel burning journalist Ahmad Mansour alive in a tent. He is now dead. Many readers will have seen on social media the image of a decapitated baby; decapitated by Israel when it bombed a UN refugee camp. 50,000 slaughtered Palestinians – mostly women and children – later, yet sycophantic cops and servile members of the public think it’s Youth Demand causing the nuisance in society?

    Our world stands on a knife edge – more so perhaps than any time in human history. From the climate crisis to brazen far-right authoritarianism in supposed democracies in the West via Israel’s impunity to commit genocide and a sixth extinction event – the ‘world order’  those in power sell us is falling apart at the seams. Humans will be lucky to make it another half-century.

    Youth Demand is rightly responding to this. And let’s be honest, the group’s actions are hardly earth-shattering.

    They are peacefully deploying mid-level civil disobedience in the face of cataclysmic world events. Yet here in the West, agents of the state and the public still believe they can go about their daily business like nothing is happening – and that any disruption to this is disastrous.

    Think yourselves lucky Lucy Parsons isn’t around

    Cops and dumb-ass members of the public (sorry, but they are) are lucky Youth Demand isn’t inspired by Black anarchist Lucy Parsons. As she once said:

    Let every dirty, lousy tramp arm himself with a revolver or a knife, and lay in wait on the steps of the palaces of the rich and stab or shoot the owners as they come out. Let us kill them without mercy, and let it be a war of extermination.

    Given how the rich and powerful kill the rest of us with impunity day in, day out – maybe she had a point.

    However, for now it’s Youth Demand (and others like Palestine Action) on the front line in the UK at least. And given the scale of persecution and repression that’s building around them. they need all our solidarity and support right now.

    Featured image and additional images via the Youth Demand

    By Steve Topple

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  •  

    After the biggest anti-Trump protests since the 2017 Women’s March, many major media outlets seemed intent on downplaying the size and significance of the massive demonstration of opposition.

    The Hands Off! protests took place on April 5 in 1,400 locations across the country, with solidarity rallies in Europe and Canada. Volunteer organizers said the events were aimed at opposing billionaire government and corruption; cuts to Social Security, Medicaid and other vital programs; and attacks on immigrants, trans people and other  vulnerable groups. At a conservative minimum, hundreds of thousands of people turned out to resist the Trump administration’s many assaults on democracy; organizers estimate the total reached into the millions.

    Burying the news

    WaPo: Thousands Gather in DC as protesters rally across the US against Trump.

    The Washington Post (4/6/25) relegated protesters “across the US” to the Metro section.

    Despite the scale and significance of the protests, neither the New York Times nor the Washington Post had stories about them on their front pages the next day.

    The Washington Post (4/6/25) had a thumbnail at the bottom of the front page with the blurb “Metro: Thousands gather in DC as protesters rally across the US against Trump.”

    The New York Times (4/6/25) had a photo below the fold that was captioned: “A Day of Protest: People gathered around the country, including in Asheville, NC, to voice opposition to Trump administration policies. Page 18.”

    New York Times: A Day of Protest

    “People gathered around the country” was how the New York Times (4/6/25) downplayed the massive wave of protest.

    A Times blurb promoting the story in a roundup of stories about “The Trump Administration’s First Hundred Days” minimized the scale and seriousness of the event:

    Anti-Trump Protests: Demonstrators packed the streets in several cities to bemoan what they considered a lack of strong opposition to the president and his policies.

    The verb “bemoan” is clearly belittling, and the focus of both organizers and participants was obviously on Trump (and Musk), not on the weakness of their opponents. And since when is 1,400 “several”?

    The downplaying of the story couldn’t be explained by a lack of audience interest; indeed, people seemed extremely eager to hear about the protests. The protest coverage buried in the Times‘ print edition was the paper’s most-clicked article online that day, according to the paper’s Morning newsletter (4/7/25).

    Little broadcast coverage

    ABC: Worldwide Anti-Trump Protests

    ABC‘s Good Morning America (4/6/25) offered protesters a few soundbites to speak for themselves.

    The major broadcast networks gave the massive protests only passing coverage in most of their programming. On ABC, World News Tonight (4/5/25) gave only 20 seconds to a correspondent in Washington, DC, to explain the signs she was seeing. The network’s morning show, Good Morning America (4/6/25), offered a bit more, with a few soundbites given to protesters to speak for themselves. In a recent FAIR study (4/4/25) of protest coverage, ABC stood out for its blackout of nationwide anti-Trump protests that, even before this past weekend, already outnumbered protests in the same time period during Trump’s first term.

    CBS Face the Nation (4/6/25) told viewers that “tens of thousands of people took to the streets yesterday from Washington, DC, to Minnesota and Columbus, Ohio, protesting many of Trump’s policies, Elon Musk and tariffs.” CBS Weekend News (4/6/25) included a short description of the protests only in the context of Trump’s tariffs, airing a soundbite of a protester speaking against them. CBS Sunday Morning (4/6/25) had another, even briefer mention of the protests, in an interview with Sen. Bernie Sanders.

    A report on NBC Nightly News (4/5/25) mentioned “huge turnouts” and “protests in nearly every state.” The item featured several short soundbites from protesters. Meet the Press (4/6/25) also mentioned the protests briefly, with images.

    Undercounting dissent

    AP: Protesters tee off against Trump and Musk in “Hands Off!” rallies across the U.S.

    AP (via Politico, 4/5/25) reported that “thousands of protesters assailed Trump.”

    NPR All Things Considered (4/5/25) told listeners that “thousands” gathered to protest Trump and Musk. So did the Associated Press (4/5/25)—whose credibility in the crowd-counting department could be judged by the article’s claim that the 2017 Women’s March also only saw “thousands.” (An effort at the time by the Washington Post to tally the US participants came up with a range of 3 million to 5 million—2/7/17.)

    ABC World News Tonight (4/5/25) announced that “thousands” gathered on the National Mall in DC.

    Over an otherwise commendable piece that compiled interviews with protesters in 11 cities and towns across the country, a USA Today subhead (4/5/25) also estimated “thousands.” It did so despite the fact that the piece led by reporting that “tens of thousands of people are gathering Saturday at rallies across the country”—itself a clear underestimate. The piece later explained that “more than 500,000 people have RSVP’d to attend” the protests, and that “protesters stretched as far as the eye could see along the National Mall and the crowd had been flowing toward the base of the Washington monument for hours.”

    Given that there were some 1,400 separate protest events, it’s laughable to suggest that only “thousands” attended. Even if only 10 people showed up to each event, you’d have “tens of thousands”—but every event the paper reported on from small towns and cities (like Stuart, Florida) had at least several hundred if not thousands, while the DC and NYC events appeared to have at least 100,000 participants apiece (American Crisis, 4/8/25). Boston’s protest was reported locally to have involved “nearly 100,000” (CBS‘s WBZ, 4/6/25; NBC Boston, 4/7/25).

    It would not be difficult for news organizations with resources like the national newspapers or major TV networks to produce credible estimates of crowd numbers at significant events. The fact that they don’t bother to do so reflects the scant importance these outlets place on the role of protests in the democratic process. Corporate media journalists are apt to regard protesters as akin to spectators rushing onto the field during a game, interfering with an activity best left to professionals.

    Better reporting?

    CNN: ‘Hands Off!’ protesters across US rally against President Donald Trump and Elon Musk

    CNN.com (4/5/25; “updated” 4/6/25) edited this piece to change an initial “millions of people took part in protests” to a ridiculous “scores.”

    CNN stood out among major corporate outlets for not underestimating the size and scope of the protests, with coverage of the protests in most of its shows over the weekend. The network repeatedly cited organizers’ estimates of at least 1,400 protest events across all 50 states, totaling “millions” of attendees (e.g., CNN This Morning, 4/6/25; CNN Inside Politics, 4/6/25). CNN correspondents in multiple US cities described the messages they heard and saw, and they also interviewed protesters on-air to let them speak for themselves.

    CNN‘s online account (4/5/25) of the protests, however, originally reported that “millions of people took part in protests against President Donald Trump and Elon Musk across all 50 states and globally on Saturday,” but was stealth-edited on April 6 to ludicrously claim that “scores of people took part in protests.” We would be interested in hearing CNN‘s explanation for this self-evidently absurd alteration.

    On CNN‘s Newsroom (4/6/25), as an indication of heightened interest in Trump opposition, senior data reporter Harry Enten pointed out that Google searches for the word “protests” were

    up 1,200% versus a year ago…. We see that the percent in number of folks who are searching for protests, interested in going out in those protests is finally matching what we saw in January of 2017, if not exceeding it.

    Axios (4/5/25) also reported organizers’ “millions” estimate, including their 500,000 RSVPs and their reports from the field that turnout was far exceeding those RSVPs. (For instance, they reported getting 2,000 RSVPs for Raleigh, NC, where they ultimately saw some 45,000 in attendance.)

    Some local papers in the Gannett chain (which also owns USA Today) usefully offered readers information about the protests planned for their states before they took place (e.g., Columbus Dispatch, 4/2/25; Florida’s TCPalm.com, 4/5/25). These stories  included why people were protesting, and the times and locations of every scheduled Hands Off! protest in their respective states.

    Such coverage treats readers as citizens, and protesting as a basic part of a democratic system—not as an inconsequential sideshow, which is how it’s generally presented in corporate media.

    This post was originally published on FAIR.

  • Two Youth Demand supporters have laid body bags at David Lammy’s door to highlight his role in continuing to facilitate Israel’s genocide in Gaza. The supporters are demanding that the UK government impose a total trade embargo on Israel, and make the super rich and fossil fuel elite pay damages to communities and countries most harmed by fossil fuel burning.

    Youth Demand: making a stark statement for David Lammy

    At around 11am on Tuesday 8 April, two Youth Demand supporters displayed a sign over the foreign secretary’s hedge which read- ‘Lammy Stop Arming Genocide’:

    Youth Demand Lammy

    At his door the pair laid child-sized body bags representing the 17,400 children that we know of who have been murdered during Israel’s genocidal rampage since 7 October 2023:

    A Youth Demand spokesperson said:

    David Lammy has admitted that Israel is in breach of international law and yet the UK has cancelled less than 10% of arms sales to Israel. 90% complicity with murder is still complicity with murder. History will rightly view those that supported the systematic slaughter of children with absolute contempt, and David Lammy will be held to account for not having the spine to cease trading with Israel and halting British armed forces from assisting this genocide.

    This action came as two groups of Youth Demand supporters once again took to the streets at around 9am, disrupting traffic at Commercial Street, Angel Junction, and Tower Bridge:

    Youth Demand Lammy

    The groups could be seen holding banners which read ‘Youth Demand an End to Genocide’ and ‘Stop Arming Israel’:

    How can we be trading with a genocidal state?

    One of those taking action was Sue Houseman, a mum from Lancaster, who said:

    For years I’ve worked with children, helping them understand what’s right and what’s wrong and giving them the confidence to use their voice and to speak up. Our government is breaking international humanitarian law and they are allowing Israel to murder children en masse. We’re providing them with the resources, the bombs, the surveillance equipment they need to kill children day in, day out and the UK government are not doing anything to stop it. If, like me, you are not prepared to put up with that, then please take action this April with Youth Demand.

    Also taking action was Cristy North, 37, a live-in carer from Nottingham, who said:

    How can we be trading with and arming a genocidal state? The UK government is breaking domestic and international law by doing so. I cannot sit back and watch a genocide take place. I originally come from South Africa. I was a lot younger when apartheid was happening there and I couldn’t do anything about it, but I saw the trauma and the effect it has had on people there and it makes me incredibly sad for this to be happening now in Palestine. We cannot sit back and do nothing, we must call on the government to impose a trade embargo on Israel, because as we saw with apartheid in South Africa, that was the final nail in the coffin that ended apartheid.

    The UK is complicit with Israel’s genocide

    Israel kills a child every 45 minutes in Gaza. That is an average of 30 children killed every day over the past 535 days. At least 17,400​ children have been killed since 7 October 2023 and many more remain lost in rubble. 1,720 of these were babies and one year olds. About half of Gaza’s 2.3 million residents are children and over the past 17 months, Israeli attacks have left their homes in ruins, destroyed their schools, and overwhelmed their healthcare facilities.

    Meanwhile, the UK continues to actively support this genocide. British military bases, arms exports, and logistical support are instrumental in sustaining Israel’s military campaign in Gaza. UK-made components are being utilised in the F-35 fighter jets that have been deployed extensively in Gaza. British citizens have also actively served in Israel’s armed forces, directly contributing to atrocities.

    Last month, David Lammy admitted in the House of Commons that Israel’s blockade preventing humanitarian supplies into Gaza, was a breach of international humanitarian law. The government subsequently rowed back on these comments stating their position was that Israel’s actions in Gaza were at ‘clear risk‘ of breaching international humanitarian law.

    Featured image and additional images supplied

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.