Category: Protest

  • Relentless direct action by Palestine Action has secured another victory in the fight against Israel‘s arms trade, as Elbit Systems are forced to sell their ‘Elite KL’ factory in Tamworth. Once again, it shows that direct action can have results.

    Palestine Action: success

    The company had previously manufactured cooling and power management systems for military vehicles, but was sold on after stating that it faced falling profits and increased security costs resulting from Palestine Action’s efforts.

    After the sale was completed last month, Elite KL’s new owners, listed as Griffin Newco Ltd, confirmed in an email to Palestine Action that they will have nothing to do with the previous owners, Elbit, and have discontinued any arms manufacturing:

    Following the recent acquisition of Elite KL Limited by a UK investment syndicate, the newly appointed board has unanimously agreed to withdraw from all future defence contracts and terminate its association with its former parent company.

    This victory is a direct result of sustained direct action which has sought, throughout Palestine Action’s existence, to make it impossible for Elbit to afford to operate in Britain.

    Before they sold the enterprise to a private equity syndicate, Elbit had reported that Elite KL operating profits had been slashed by over three-quarters, with Palestine Action responsible: Elbit directly cited the increased expenditure on security they’d been forced to make, and higher supply chain costs they faced.

    And these actions did, indeed, cost them.

    Relentless direct action

    The first action at the site, in November 2020, saw Elite KL’s premises smashed into, the building covered in blood-red paint.

    Between March and July 2021, the site was put out of action three times by roof-top occupations – drenched red in March 2021, with the factory’s camera systems dismantled, before again being occupied in in May. Another roof-top occupation in July, despite increased security, saw the site forced closed – once again painted blood-red, and with its windows and fixings smashed through.

    In February 2022, activists decommissioned the site for weeks – closed off after an occupation that saw over £250,000 of damages caused, the roof tiles removed one-by-one.

    After this, Elbit erected a security perimeter around the site – but to no avail. One month later, six were arrested after Palestine Action returned to Tamworth – again taking the roof and smashing through, preventing the production of parts for Israel’s military machine.

    End the profiteering, says Palestine Action

    Elite KL is a ‘specialist thermal management business’. Since the sale, the company focuses on cooling systems for buses and trains, but it had, under Elbit, manufactured these systems for military vehicles.

    Until December of last year, Elite KL’s website was advertising its military and defence products, and it was known to provide parts for Israel’s deadly Merkava tanks, with export license records demonstrating its provision of ‘ML6a’ components for military ground vehicles to Israel.

    The company was also known to manufacture crew cooling systems, for the military vests of tank operators.

    Elbit Systems itself provides 85% of the drones and land-based military equipment for the Israeli military, along with a wide range of the munitions and armaments currently being used against Gaza’s beseiged population.

    Its CEO, Bazhalel Machlis, has claimed that the Israeli military has offered the company its thanks for their “crucial” services during the ongoing genocide in Gaza

    A Palestine Action spokesperson said:

    Each activist who occupied and dismantled Tamworth’s Elbit weapons factory did so in order to bring an end to Israel’s weapons trade, and to end the profiteering from Palestinian repression. Every defeat Elbit faces is a victory for the Palestinian people.

    Kicking Elbit out of Tamworth shows once again that direct action is a necessary tactic. It is one which must be utilised and amplified in the face of the Gaza genocide.

    Featured image via Palestine Action

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Israeli-owned fossil fuel company Ithaca Energy has announced a year of staggering profits from its oil and gas drilling in the North Sea.

    Now, the climate crisis and apartheid-mongering fossil fuel corporation is on track to become the UK’s largest North Sea oil and gas operator.

    So, climate activists have once again turned up the heat.

    Ithaca – fueling the climate crisis

    Ithaca Energy is one of the largest oil and gas companies operating in the UK. Specifically, the company owns shares in six of the UK’s ten largest oil fields.

    If this wasn’t enough, it has a significant stake in two of the largest pre-development fields. This includes 100% ownership of the carbon bomb Cambo oil field and a 20% stake in the even more climate-catastrophic Rosebank oil field.

    For Cambo’s part, the project will belch 132 million tonnes of carbon emissions into the atmosphere over the course of its lifetime. Rosebank is worse. The oil and gas behemoth will spew out over 200 million tonnes of carbon emissions. Or in human terms – the emissions equivalent of the 28 lowest income countries.

    Of course, these would be a disaster for the climate. However, as both people and the planet are set to lose out, Ithaca will stand to gain stonking profits from manufacturing this climate misery.

    Already, it is profiting from destruction.

    Dividends flowing from the North Sea

    Ithaca’s extensive drilling projects in the North Sea netted the oil and gas company $215.6m in profits for 2023.

    On Wednesday 27 March, Ithaca dropped its full year financial results. The figures painted a stark picture for the climate, as profits poured out from another booming year of oil and gas production.

    However, as the Canary has previously pointed out, these profits are also likely propping up Israel’s genocide in Gaza, and violent ethnic cleansing in the West Bank.

    Specifically, Israeli conglomerate Delek Group owns the UK big North Sea oil and gas player. Notably, the UN has featured Delek:

    on its list of 112 companies operating in Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territories.

    In particular, this list records corporations in settlements that are regarded as illegal under international law. Moreover, we pointed out that the Delek Group is:

    also involved in the extraction of oil and gas from disputed maritime areas of the Levant Basin.

    Meanwhile, the company is additionally a shareholder of Delek Israel Fuel. The subsidiary operates various gas and service stations in and around Israeli settlements. Perhaps most significantly, it supplies fuel to various arms of the Israeli occupation forces.

    Since Delek Group owns the majority shares in Ithaca of 88.5%, Ithaca channels much of its oil and gas takings back up to its parent company. Invariably, some of this funds Delek’s contentious operations in occupied Palestine.

    Crucially, we highlighted Novara Media’s research, which found that:

    Ithaca would send $355m of its $400m planned dividends for 2023 to its parent company.

    Naturally, the accounts confirmed that the company met its target. So, it will funnel some $355m in oil money into the pockets of violent Israeli settler colonisers and genocidaires oppressing Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza. In other words, so long as Ithaca’s Israeli parent company siphons profits from the North Sea, Palestine cannot be free.

    Dominating North Sea oil and gas

    To make matters worse, the company is only looking to expand its oily reach further.

    For one, the company bagged itself a number of new UK oil and gas licenses at the end of October 2023. Of course, this was in the height of Israel’s brutal genocidal siege on Gaza.

    Not only that, Ithaca now plans to dominate the North Sea’s fossil fuel sector. Soon, the pure fossil fuel company will be the biggest player in North Sea oil and gas. As Jonathan Leake revealed for Yahoo Finance and the Telegraph, Ithaca has struck a deal with Italian oil and gas major ENI.

    This will see the company take over four major platforms in some of the UK’s largest oil and gas fields. As such, the company anticipates its production to double, soaring past 100,000 barrels a day.

    For context, Equinor and Ithaca project that their climate-wrecking Rosebank oil field will produce 70,000 barrels of oil per day during its first seven years of peak oil production.

    What’s more, the deal would enable Ithaca to break into new European oil and gas markets to boot. As Leake reported:

    A key prize in the deal with Eni is that it includes Neptune Energy, a private-equity backed company that produces oil and gas from UK fields but also controls fields in seven other countries, including Norway, Germany, Algeria, the Netherlands and Indonesia.

    “Ithaca kills”

    Given all this, climate activists haven’t stood idly by.

    First, on 20 March, over 80 organisations wrote to the CEOs of 12 major banks. They called on the large financiers to stop funding the minority owner of the gargantuan Rosebank project. Notably, the letter called out the company’s link to Delek and by extension, its complicity in Israel’s illegal settlements in Palestine.

    In particular, grassroots climate group Fossil Free London has staged a series of actions shining a light on the company’s destructive operations. So next, its activists took Norwegian fossil fuel giant Equinor to task for its Rosebank partnership with Ithaca.

    On Thursday 21 March, Fossil Free London descended on Equinor’s London offices. In tandem, activists from Aksjon for Palestina, Stopp Oljeletinga (Just Stop Oil Norway) and Extinction Rebellion Norway blocked four Equinor offices across Norway.

    Now, Fossil Free London has once again dialled up the heat – this time directly targeting Ithaca itself.

    Coinciding with the company’s full year financial results announcement, activists demonstrated outside its London office.

    Actvists hold Palestinian flags and a banner which reads "Ithaca Kills" outside the company's London office building.

    Activists chanted “Ithaca leave it in the ground” and engaged with employees as they entered the office.

    Activists engage with employees as they enter Ithaca's offices. Banner reads: "Ithaca Kills".Activists hand information leaflets to Ithaca employees.

    They held banners reading ‘Ithaca Kills’ in front of the entrance.

    Activists hold Palestinian flags and a placard that reads "Oil + gas have got to go"An activist raises a sign that reads: "Wanted - Ithaca Energy - for apartheid colonialism & climate destruction. Reward: a liveable future."

    “From Rosebank to the West Bank”

    Ostensibly, the group aims to draw attention to Ithaca’s role in both the climate crisis, and Israel’s genocidal and violent colonial occupation of Palestine. Spokesperson for Fossil Free London Joanna Warrington said:

    We know that burning fossil fuels are destroying our only home and each new barrel of oil means more human suffering. Yet Ithaca wants to drill two more massive oil fields, quietly profiting from destruction whilst we burn. Their profit is our loss.

    From Rosebank to the Westbank, millions in profit will be sent to a sister company operating illegal Israeli settlements in Palestine. Ithaca does not have as big a reputation for dirty business as the likes of Shell and BP, but they should be said in the same breath. We should be ashamed to have a company like this operating in the UK.

    Needless to say, climate activists connecting the dots between fossil fuel extractivism and violent imperial impulses will keep protesting against shameless corporate opportunists like Ithaca. And they won’t stop until Ithaca is finally “out” of oil and gas, and Israel out of Palestine for good.

    Featured image and additional images via Fossil Free London

    By Hannah Sharland

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • The Jeremy Corbyn-founded Peace and Justice Project has joined forces with one of the few remaining decent Labour Party MPs, Zarah Sultana. It’s over Israel‘s ongoing genocide in Gaza and the UK’s complicity in it. Meanwhile, another huge national protest in support of the Palestinian people is on the cards.

    March for Palestine

    On Saturday 30 March hundreds of thousands of people are expected to demonstrate in London on the 11th National March for Palestine:

    Israel’s prolonged and brutal attack on Gaza has killed more than 32 000 people, with thousands more missing as up to 80% of buildings have been damaged or destroyed. Famine is imminent as 1.1 million people, half of Gaza, experience catastrophic food insecurity. Children are already reported to be dying of hunger in northern Gaza.

    On Monday 25 March the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), including the UK, finally voted for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza during Ramadan. It also urged that Israel lift “all barriers to the provision of humanitarian assistance at scale.” Israel has rejected the vote, despite it being considered binding under international law.

    Stop the War Coalition said of the resolution:

    More than anything it is a product of the mass protests and popular disgust at Israel’s genocide around the world. It will take more pressure to make a ceasefire a reality and that is why we must redouble our efforts for this Saturday’s national demonstration.

    Yet Israel has continued to bombard Gaza, block aid deliveries and to threaten a ground invasion of Rafah, which will cause further mass casualties among the 1.5 million Palestinian civilians sheltering there. As the Canary‘s James Wright wrote:

    After the US failed to again veto the resolution, Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu cancelled a Washington visit by two of his top advisors.

    Although the US walked back its position, in contrary to international law, stating that the resolution was non-binding.

    The resolution doesn’t go far enough. The Security Council must order a permanent ceasefire along with an end to the Israeli occupation of Palestine. This would help initiate lasting peace in the region.

    Stop arming Israel

    So, on Wednesday 27 March a cross party group of at least 135 politicians wrote to the foreign secretary and business secretary, saying the case for a suspension of arms export licenses for supplies to Israel is “overwhelming”:

    They argue that the ruling of the International Court of Justice that there is plausible evidence of Israel committing genocide in Gaza places a legal duty on the government not to allow arms exports, as there is a clear risk they will be used in breach of international law.

    The Peace and Justice Project is supporting Sultana. It said:

    The US and the UK could immediately put an end to this war by ending their supply of arms to Israel. We must keep up the pressure and ask our government to suspend all arms exports to Israel as they both violate the latest UN resolution as well as being used in a potential case of genocide as per the ICJ ruling.

    It’s encouraging people to write to their MPs – asking them to sign Sultana’s letter. You can do that here.

    Keep the pressure up to stop Israel

    The rally on 30 March which meets at Russell Square will feature a range of speakers and performances, including actor Khalid Abdalla (star of The Kite Runner and The Crown), the poet Alexei Sayle, singers Reem Kalani, Oscar Jerome, Alexi Murdoch, and Rou Reynolds from the rock band Enter Shikari.

    Ben Jamal, Palestine Solidarity Campaign director, said :

    Popular pressure is building globally on leaders to take action to end Israel’s genocide against the Palestinian people in Gaza. The US decision not to block the UNSC vote, and the UK’s decision to back it, are evidence of this. However, the Security Council resolution, whilst welcome, was inadequate, calling for a temporary pause and not a permanent ceasefire.

    With hundreds of thousands of Palestinians on the brink of famine, and Israel making clear it will ignore the UN, action is needed now to enforce the will of the international community. The clear duty of the UK government is to end its complicity in Israel’s genocide.

    An immediate first step, under its own export guidelines, as recognised by 135 MPs and peers, is to suspend export licenses for arms supplies to Israel. This must be followed by a resumption of funding to UNWRA, the Palestinian refugee agency that can prevent famine taking hold in Gaza. Hundreds of thousands will again march on Saturday to press these demands.

    The Peace and Justice Project said:

    The situation on the ground in Gaza is catastrophic and is getting worse by the day. Despite global calls for peace, innocent lives continue to be lost, and the humanitarian crisis deepens.

    Children suffer from malnutrition, and essential aid is obstructed, with clear consensus from aid agencies that land routes are indispensable for sufficient relief. We must redouble our efforts to call for a ceasefire now and for the war not to spread further to Rafah where over 1.4 million people are sheltering for safety with nowhere else to go.

    Featured image via the Peace and Justice Project

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • A former chairman of, and shadowy lobbyist for, Elbit Systems – currently running another company linked to the weapons manufacturer – got a reminder of his complicity in Israel‘s genocide in Gaza. It was a stark one at that, with Palestine Action branding him a “child killer”.

    Palestine Action: going after the lobbyists

    Palestine Action targeted the registered address and chartered accountants of Eagle Strategic Consulting Limited in Dorset on Wednesday 27 March. It is a consultancy firm for Elbit which is wholly owned by Richard (Dick) Applegate.

    The activists shattered windows and spray painted “Dick Applegate is a child killer”. Dick Applegate is the current ‘Head of Strategy and New Business’ and former chairman for Elbit Systems UK:

    Elbit Systems UK is a part of Israel’s largest weapons firm, who market their weapons as “battle-tested” after they are developed on bombardments of the Palestinian people. The Israeli weapons maker produces 85% of Israel’s military drone fleet and land-based equipment, as well as munitions, electronic warfare, missiles and more.

    Elbit’s CEO has publicly stated the company’s deep involvement in providing weaponry for the Israeli military during the ongoing Gaza genocide.

    Applegate was reportedly involved in a campaign to secure a £500 million contract for Israeli arms firm Elbit Systems. The Sunday Times reported that:

    He confided that he used Westminster Connection, a discreet lobbying firm with Israeli links, as a “firebreak” to ensure “that my fingerprints weren’t over any of it”. It could gain access to anyone “from the Prime Minister down”. He said the firm, based in Victoria and co-owned by Scott Hamilton, a former Conservative staffer, had used its links with Conservative Friends of Israel (CFI) to persuade MPs in the Commons to assist him in his campaign.

    ‘Swimming in profits from Palestinian bloodshed’

    He left the British armed forces in 2010 as a Lieutenant General. During his time in the army he was deployed in Bosnia and Kosovo. In 2007, he was Chief of Material and a main board member of the ‘Defence Equipment and Support’ organisation, with a specific role of organising the weapons supply chains for the invasion and occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan.

    A Palestine Action spokesperson said:

    Dick Applegate swims in profits he makes from Palestinian bloodshed. We remain committed to targeting all firms and associations which enable Israel’s weapons trade to continue fuelling the Gaza genocide. There is no space for war criminals on our streets and we will take direct action to ensure those responsible for mass murder are held accountable.

    Featured image via Palestine Action

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.


  • This content originally appeared on Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty and was authored by Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on The Grayzone and was authored by The Grayzone.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Independent journalist Ashoka Jegroo was shoved to the ground and arrested by police officers while documenting a pro-Palestinian protest in New York City on Feb. 29, 2024.

    Jegroo told the U.S. Press Freedom Tracker that demonstrators initially gathered at Union Square in Manhattan before taking the subway downtown en masse to the Financial District to attempt to disrupt Gov. Kathy Hochul’s planned remarks at a Wall Street restaurant. An organizer with the protest group Within Our Lifetime told The New York Times that they targeted Hochul over statements she made that month about the Israel-Gaza war.

    Police closed down the block around the restaurant, Jegroo said, and protesters tried to march around the block before ultimately making their way up to the intersection of Broadway and Vesey Street. As he crossed the street and neared the sidewalk, Jegroo said a bicycle officer suddenly grabbed him and pulled him into the street.

    “When they grabbed me there were people and other journalists yelling, ‘He’s press! He’s press!’” he told the Tracker. “Even though I wasn’t resisting at all, they pulled both of my arms behind my back aggressively and almost pushed me face-first onto the ground where they'd thrown their bikes.”

    Jegroo said that he was able to position himself so he landed on the bicycles on his knees, which caused a gash across his shin. Three or four other people at the demonstration were also arrested, at least two of whom were also injured.

    Upon arriving at One Police Plaza, Jegroo said he was the last of the arrestees to be processed because of confusion over who his arresting officer was. He was released later that night and charged with disorderly conduct and walking in a roadway when a sidewalk was available. It was his second arrest in recent months while documenting a pro-Palestinian protest in New York City.

    The New York Police Department did not respond to a request for comment.

    Gideon Oliver, an attorney representing Jegroo, told the Tracker that a judge dismissed the walking on the roadway charge during a preliminary hearing on March 20. For the disorderly conduct charge, Jegroo accepted an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal, under which proceedings are put on hold for six months. After that, the charge is dismissed if there have been no further arrests.

    “Obviously I have to be a little bit more cautious now: I can’t take as many risks,” Jegroo told the Tracker. “I can’t get as close to the action as I’d like to, but I’m not going to stop. I’m still going to go out there. That’s the only ‘chill’ there will be on my reporting.”

    When reached via email, a press officer for the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office said they could not provide further information because the case was sealed, but noted that accepting an ACD is one of the reasons a case may be sealed.


    This content originally appeared on U.S. Press Freedom Tracker: Incident Database and was authored by U.S. Press Freedom Tracker: Incident Database.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Palestine Action has once again shown the power of direct action – by shutting down another UK weapons factory. Meanwhile, activists in the US have stepped up their campaign, also shutting an arms company facility down. The company in question is of course Elbit – and its complicity in Israel‘s genocide continues.

    Palestine Action: once again stopping the flow of arms to Israel

    Eight activists from UK Palestine Action blockaded all three access points into Elbit’s Instro Precision weapons factory in Discovery Park, Kent on Tuesday 26 March:

    Elbit Palestine Action

    By attaching themselves to each other via lock ons, they successfully shut down the Israeli weapons maker:

    Instro Precision based in Discovery Park, Kent, is owned by Elbit Systems, Israel’s largest weapons firm. Elbit Systems provide a range of weaponry for the Israeli military, including 85% of their military drone fleet and land-based equipment, as well as electronic warfare, bullets, munitions and gun components.

    In the past 171 days, the Israeli military has massacred at least 32,226 Palestinians (including 13,000 children) and injured over 74,518 Palestinians. In order to arm the live-streamed genocide, Elbit’s CEO Bezhalel Machlis said the company has “ramped up production” for the Israeli military who use Elbit’s services and weaponry “extensively”.

    Instro Precision Ltd manufactures a range of military equipment for the purposes of warfare, targeting and repression. These include weapons sights for infantry and heavy artillery, such as the XACT th64 sights – which have been sold in quantities of thousands to the Israeli military to be used against the Palestinian people.

    Elbit: complicit in genocide

    The Israeli weapons factory regularly exports weapons to Israel under the categories ML5s (Weapons Sights) and ML11s (Electronic Equipment). So, Palestine Action rightly acted:

    As of 10:30am, nothing was coming in or going out of Elbit’s factory:

    This blocking comes after Palestine Action also disrupted Elbit’s office supply company on 22 March:

    Meanwhile, activists US has also been busy. It’s members and supporters also blocked an Elbit facility in New Hampshire:

    As the New Hampshire Journal reported, cops arrested eight people because:

    protestors blocking the entrance prevented employees and emergency personnel from entering the property.

    Two people attached to the car had cut holes in the doors of the vehicle, placed their arms through the holes, and chained themselves. One person in the car had what was described as multiple restraints and chains preventing her from being removed.

    Authorities reportedly needed chainsaws to cut the restraints. Levesque said more than 70 first responders, including a state police bomb squad, reported to the scene.

    70 US cops and other state agents for the sake of eight arrests all feels a bit like how authorities respond to protests in the UK; as does the state protecting private corporations:

    Palestine Action: an ‘obligation’ to shut Elbit down

    A Palestine Action spokesperson said:

    Our commitment to the struggle for Palestinian liberations remains stronger than ever, which means it is our obligation to shut down the means of weapons production for the Israeli military. We refuse to continue appealing to the political establishment to end our collective complicity in genocide. Instead, we will take direct action to shut down Israel’s weapons trade.

    Featured image and additional images via Palestine Action

    By Steve Topple

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • On Saturday 23 March around two hundred people gathered outside the new Elbit Horizon H2 factory in Filton, north Bristol. It was to protest against the company’s complicity in Israel‘s ongoing genocide in Gaza.

    Bristol: standing up to Elbit and Israel

    Bristol Palestine Alliance was formed in response to the horrific events happening in Gaza.

    Acting as an umbrella group, it brings members from organisations and groups and communities in Bristol together to respond collectively to organise marches and other events to call for a ceasefire in Gaza and an end to Israel’s brutal occupation of Palestine. It has already staged numerous actions since 7 October – and now, organised another one on 23 March outside Elbit’s new factory.

    People hung children’s toys and clothes on the fences around the site and they laid cloth bundles stained with red on the road to the factory to symbolise babies killed in Gaza:

    Children's toys and clothes hung on Elbit's fence in Bristol

    In addition, children chalked slogans on the tarmac.

    Messages of support

    Despite a bitter cold wind plus at times rain and a hailstorm, the crowd listened to a range of speakers including a local hospital doctor, a university academic, a journalist, local campaigners, and Zoe Goodman, an independent city councillor who earlier this year resigned from the Labour group in protest at the party’s position on Gaza:

    There was a message of support from Ronnie Barkan, an Israeli dissident – who recently stood trial as part of the Elbit-7 for direct action at the Aztec West Elbit site nearby. There was a further message from Andrew Feinstein, arms trade expert and Jewish member of the post-Apartheid ANC government in South Africa.

    Of course, Bristol Palestine Alliance was protesting for good reason.

    Elbit: complicit in genocide

    Elbit Systems UK is owned by Israel’s largest weapons firm, which markets its weaponry as “battle-tested” after they’re developed through assaults on the Palestinian people.

    The Israeli weapons maker manufactures 85% of Israel’s military drone fleet and land-based equipment, as well as missiles, bombs and bullets. Elbit’s CEO Bazhalel Machlis, who sits on the board of Elbit Systems UK, boasted of how the Israeli military has thanked the company for their “crucial” services during the ongoing genocide in Gaza.

    Since 7 October, Israel has killed over 32,000 Palestinians, injured over 73,000, and displaced the vast majority of Gaza.

    In Bristol, as Campaign Against Arms Trade (CAAT) wrote:

    This ‘research, development and manufacturing hub for high technology solutions’ was opened in July 2023 by the Israeli ambassador, Tzipi Hotovely, and local Tory MP Jack Lopresti. It is the second Elbit Systems facility in Bristol, the other being at 600 Aztec West

    As the Canary recently reported, Palestine Action is currently camping outside Elbit’s HQ at 600 Aztec West in Bristol. Therefore, the demo outside Elbit’s other site was well-timed.

    ‘We shall overcome’

    So, some names of the dead in Gaza were read out to the crowd at the Bristol Palestine Alliance demo who chanted “Killed by Elbit. Killed by Israel”. The crowd was also joined by members of the “Big Ride for Palestine” who cycled up from central Bristol.

    The rally concluded with the crowd gathering alongside a banner reading “STOP ARMING ISRAEL”:

    A banner reading Stop Arming Israel

    The crowd finished by singing the 1960s Civil Rights anthem We Shall Overcome – an apt conclusion to proceedings.

    Featured image and additional images via BPA

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.


  • This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Radio Free Asia.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Robin Epley, an opinion columnist for The Sacramento Bee, was briefly detained while documenting a protest that disrupted a Sacramento City Council meeting on March 19, 2024.

    In an account of the incident published by the Bee, Epley wrote that a pro-Palestinian protest in the City Council chambers began after Mayor Darrell Steinberg introduced a resolution calling for a cease-fire in Gaza. Steinberg recessed the meeting and ordered the chambers to be cleared, but many people initially refused to leave.

    After about 90 minutes, by 10:37 p.m., Epley wrote, only a few dozen people remained and she noticed that she was the only journalist still observing the protest. “From experience, I know that’s a rare and potentially important position; I’d never relinquish it unless absolutely necessary,” Epley wrote.

    Epley told the U.S. Press Freedom Tracker that more than 50 police officers then entered the chambers, gave a final warning and began arresting the last 12 stragglers. Shortly after 10:50 p.m., Epley saw the officer who was overseeing the arrests point at her.

    “Surely, I thought, he was motioning to someone behind me?” Epley wrote. “By the time I realized no one was there, a couple of officers had already descended on my back, ripping my cellphone from my hand and locking me in a pair of black metal cuffs.”

    In footage Epley shared on social media, she can be heard asking the officers, “Are you really arresting me right now?”

    Epley told the Tracker that she was wearing press credentials issued by the Bee and that she repeatedly identified herself as a journalist. After approximately 25 seconds, the officers uncuffed her and checked her press pass before allowing her to resume documenting the other arrests.

    “There is no reason, no action I took, nothing I said nor did that provoked these officers of the Sacramento Police Department to handcuff me,” Epley wrote. “Their actions alone resulted in the illegal detainment of a working and visibly credentialed journalist, no matter how short the duration of my time in their custody.”

    David Loy, legal director of the First Amendment Coalition, told the Bee that police have no business arresting members of the press, even if only for a few seconds.

    “There is a disturbing trend around the country of journalists being arrested and prosecuted simply for being journalists,” Loy said. “Whether the arrest just happened for just a few minutes or someone is prosecuted, these are clear threats to press freedom and the First Amendment.”

    Epley told the Tracker that she is undaunted by the experience.

    “I feel fired up,” Epley said. “I try to remind myself that when informed of their mistake they let me out of the cuffs pretty immediately. Ultimately I’m fine, but it’s the meaning of it that is making me upset, what it means to have handcuffed a journalist.”

    She said that the Sacramento Police Department has reached out to the Bee to set up a meeting with editors.

    The Sacramento Police Department said in an emailed statement that when the chambers were cleared they advised members of the press to stage in the lobby and that officers were instructed to look for city-issued press credentials, which it asserts Epley was not wearing.

    Epley said that she wasn’t told the credentials were mandatory and that, when the lightweight pass broke, she stopped wearing it. She also refuted the police’s assertion that media were told to stage in the lobby, saying that no officers spoke with her after the meeting was recessed.

    In a statement shared with the Tracker, Mayor Steinberg said that there was “some confusion” concerning Epley’s credentials and that she was immediately released once it was cleared up.

    “I do not support the arrest of journalists in chambers,” Steinberg said. “It is essential that we uphold and protect the important role that the press plays in our society.”


    This content originally appeared on U.S. Press Freedom Tracker: Incident Database and was authored by U.S. Press Freedom Tracker: Incident Database.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Manila on Monday summoned a Chinese envoy to strongly protest the “aggressive actions” of the China Coast Guard in the South China Sea, following an incident that left three crew members aboard a Philippine supply boat injured.

    The Philippines was on Saturday attempting to resupply troops stationed on a ship at Second Thomas Shoal, known locally as Ayungin Shoal, when China’s coast guard and maritime militia “harassed, blocked, deployed water cannons, and executed dangerous maneuvers against the routine RoRe [rotation and resupply] mission,” officials said.

    Chinese water cannon blasts hurt three Filipino crew members and caused “significant damages to the vessel,” the Philippine Coast Guard said.

    “The Department of Foreign Affairs summoned the Charge d’affaires of the Chinese Embassy this morning to convey the Philippines’ strong protest against the aggressive actions undertaken by the China Coast Guard and Chinese Maritime Militia against the rotation and resupply mission undertaken by the Philippines in Ayungin Shoal on 23 March 2024,” Ma. Teresita Daza, a spokeswoman for the Department of Foreign Affairs, said in a statement. 

    China “has no right to be in Ayungin Shoal,” she said, a low-tide elevation that lies well within the Philippines’ exclusive economic zone.

    “China’s continued interference with the Philippines’ routine and lawful activities in its own exclusive economic zone is unacceptable,” said Daza.

    Saturday’s incident was the second time this month that Philippine crew members were injured in a confrontation between Chinese and Philippine ships in the disputed South China Sea.

    Tense incidents at sea have become more frequent lately, as Chinese ships try to block Philippine ships and boats from delivering supplies to Manila’s military outpost there. 

    The Philippines in 1999 deliberately grounded an old navy ship on the shoal – BRP Sierra Madre – where it maintains a detachment of troops.

    Four crew members aboard a military-contracted Philippine ship sustained minor injuries when a water cannon blast from China Coast Guard ships shattered the windshield on the bridge during the incident on March 5, according to Filipino officials.

    “The Philippines urges China to take the correct track of abiding by international law and respecting the legitimate rights of other states like the Philippines, and to cease and desist from its continued violation of international law,” Daza said, adding the Philippine embassy in Beijing had also been instructed to lodge a protest with China’s foreign ministry. 

    China claims nearly the entire South China Sea, including Second Thomas Shoal that is within the Philippines’ exclusive economic zone. Vietnam, Brunei, Malaysia and Taiwan also have territorial claims to the sea.

    A 2016 ruling by the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague dismissed China’s sweeping historical claims to the waterway, but Beijing has refused to acknowledge the ruling. 

     000_34M396M.jpgThis frame grab from aerial video footage taken and released on March 23, 2024 by the Armed Forces of the Philippines shows a vessel described as a China Coast Guard ship (L) deploying water cannon against the Philippine military-chartered civilian boat Unaizah May 4 during its supply mission near the Second Thomas Shoal. (Armed Forces of the Philippines/AFP)

    On Monday, China’s embassy in Manila said it had communicated its “strong opposition” to the Philippine government, which it accused of attempting to transport construction materials to the shoal – a claim that Manila has denied. 

    “The China Coast Guard in response has implemented lawful regulation, interception, and expulsion in a reasonable and professional manner,” the embassy said in a statement.

    It added that the international arbitration award in 2016 was illegal and therefore “null and void.”

    Philippine Defense Secretary Gilberto Teodoro on Monday urged Beijing to take its claims of sovereignty in the South China Sea to international arbitration.

    “If China is not afraid to state its claims to the world, then why don’t we arbitrate under international law?” Teodoro told reporters, adding Manila would not budge on its position.

    “They are the ones who entered our territory. No country believes [their claims] and they see this as their way to use force, intimidate and bend the Philippines to their ambitions.”

    Washington condemned China’s most recent actions as “dangerous” and said they “undermine regional stability but also display a blatant disregard for international law.”

    “[The] People’s Republic of China (PRC) ships’ repeated employment of water cannons and reckless blocking maneuvers resulted in injuries to Filipino service members and significant damage to their resupply vessel, rendering it immobile,” said State Department spokesman Matthew Miller.

    Jeoffrey Maitem and Mark Navales reported from Manila.

    BenarNews is an RFA-affiliated online news organization.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by By BenarNews Staff.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Nearly a year on from Perenco spilling 200 barrels of pollution into one of the world’s largest natural harbours in Poole, Dorset, the BBC reported that the oil and gas company has pledged there would be “no repeat.” Yet, just days ahead of the anniversary, Perenco has once again hit headlines. This time, it was for a fatal fire at one of its oil platforms off the coast of Gabon.

    So, on Saturday 23 March local climate activists held a protest march to the site of Perenco’s onshore oil field operations near Poole. There, activists weren’t holding back in calling out Perenco’s well-oiled PR spin to the corporate media – namely the BBC. Crucially, they showed the public broadcaster why shouldn’t so readily buy into the fossil fuel corporation’s narrative, hook, line, and sinker.

    Perenco oil spill

    On March 26 2023, Perenco spilled 200 barrels of ‘reservoir fluid’ into Poole Harbour.

    It leaked from a corroded pipeline situated under Poole Harbour. Perenco caused the spill at its Wytch Farm onshore oilfield site at Studland, Dorset.

    Perenco shut down the pipeline in response to the incident. Following this, the company mobilised the local harbour commissioners and the oil spill response teams to contain the leak. It continued remediation works at the site until January 2024.

    As the Canary noted at the time:

    The harbour is adjacent to multiple biodiverse protected sites. For example, Poole Rocks Marine Conservation Zone lies just east of the harbour entrance, and is home to more than 360 marine species.

    So, a year on from prospective environmental catastrophe, activists marched to the oil field to call for an end to the Anglo-French firm’s extractive operations near key conservation hotspots.

    Protest march to Perenco Wytch Farm

    Extinction Rebellion Bournemouth, Christchurch, and Poole (XR BCP) coordinated the action which saw campaigners from across the South West converge on Perenco’s oil field facilities.

    Activists from Extinction Rebellion Wimborne and Purbeck, alongside East Dorset Friends of the Earth (FoE), Bournemouth and Poole Greenpeace, and other groups turned up to demand the company cease oil extraction in Dorset.

    Around 70 protesters gathered with drums, placards, and flags two miles from Perenco’s onshore site. Before setting off, an activist led the group in protest song:

    Environmental activists gather before setting off on a 3km march to Wytch Farm oil field. A protester leads the group in song.

    They began via road from Corfe Castle, raising banners that read: “Perenco out”:

    Protesters march along a road towards Perenco's Wytch Farm oil field. They carry a banner that reads: "Perenco Out"

    For an hour, activists slow-marched across 3km of lowland heathland and birch-pine woods, where Perenco carries out its oil extraction, purposely out of sight from nearby communities in Poole and Dorset. As they went, they were singing, drumming, and shouting for the oil company to end its drilling at the site.

    Protesters march with drums and "Perenco out" flags across the lowland heath.

    On arrival at Wytch Farm, they blocked the main entry gates for another hour:

    Protesters turn the corner to Wytch Farm's entrance. Perenco Wytch Farm sign in the foreground.

    Activists block Wytch Farm's main entrance with placards and banners. One reads: "Perenco Climate Criminals" while another states: "Eyes on Perenco".

    "Perenco Out" flags blow in the wind near the entrance to Wytch Farm.

    Then, activists held speeches and picnics against the backdrop of Perenco’s entrance, where behind around 70 operating wells are extracting oil beyond:

    Protesters drum and picnic outside Wytch Farm.

    Protesters gather with placards and drums at Wytch Farm.

    The protest marked XR BCP’s sixth demonstration against the fossil fuel corporation since it caused the spill.

    Ecological and human disaster averted in Poole Harbour… for now

    Despite early concerns after the incident, two new reports have suggested that Perenco managed to avoid causing long-term ecological disaster.

    On Tuesday 19 March, local authorities and environmental regulators published impact reports on the spill. Bournemouth, Christchurch, and Poole Council (BCP), and Dorset County Council (DCC) commissioned the first report.

    This found that there were negligible to minimal impacts on the local community’s health, the economy, and the environment. However, it did acknowledge that the financial costs did disproportionately fall on small and medium enterprises in the area. Particularly, the spill hurt local aquaculture and fishing businesses.

    In tandem with this, the Environment Agency and the Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (CEFAS), with other agencies, released its summary assessment of the environmental impacts. Notably, the report reviewed how the spill had affected shellfish, birds, seagrass, and seabed habitats.

    Overall, it concluded that:

    The investigation and monitoring activity undertaken to date indicates that there has been limited impact from the incident on the wider Poole Harbour area. The key impacts have been on the activity in and around Poole Harbour in the first two weeks after the incident when fishing and shellfish activities were restricted.

    From an ecological perspective there does not appear to have been a material impact on the wider Poole Harbour area from data and observations to date.

    In other words, it determined that the spill had caused limited, short-term damage to marine life in the harbour.

    However, a protester pointed out that despite the purportedly minimised harm, Perenco had only just concluded the spill remediation works in January. Property Manager and XR BCP activist Greg Lambe said:

    what damage would a larger spill cause and how long would it take to remove – if this were even possible, if this relatively small spill took 10 to 11 months?

    Perenco’s “ailing, ageing infrastructure”

    Predominantly, the activists at the demonstration weren’t convinced that this would be a one-time incident.

    Long-time East Dorset Friends of the Earth campaigner Martin Price has been scrutinising Wytch Farm’s activities since the site opened in 1979. He told the Canary that while he acknowledged that the reports showed that Perenco “acted as quickly as it could to deal with the problem once it occurred”, he argued that:

    On the other hand, it has caused a huge amount of damage in a very restricted area and I think one of the problems is that it could happen again.

    In particular, Price emphasised that:

    They say it won’t happen again – this particular problem won’t happen again, perhaps, but if a similar or different problem happens elsewhere, it could be much more devastating to the environment of Poole Harbour and the surrounding area.

    Moreover, he said that this was due to “ailing, ageing infrastructure”. Specifically, Price referenced the site’s former owner, BP. The oil and gas giant sold its Wytch Farm assets to Perenco in 2011. It did so in response to leaking at least 4.9 million barrels of oil into the Gulf of Mexico, in its infamous Deepwater Horizon disaster.

    Price explained to the Canary that it sold Wytch Farm:

    because it was becoming uneconomic for them. Now, if a big multinational feels it’s uneconomic, then they’re basically handing they’re problem onto somebody else. With the best will in the world, with the best investment in the world, Perenco really can’t afford to keep this going for longer.

    In essence, it decided to sell off older, less profitable assets in the UK to finance the spiralling costs of its clean-up. As a result, Perenco now operates these end-of-life oil wells.

    Of course, it is precisely this ageing infrastructure that campaigners contend is the issue.

    Multiple “wake-up calls”

    In fact, before it sold off Wytch Farm to Perenco, BP also caused a leak at the site. This forced the company to shut down its operations there for two months in early 2011. Fellow East Dorset Friends of the Earth campaigner Angela Pooley told the Daily Echo at the time that the leak towards the end of 2010:

    should be a wake-up call to us all to remind us of the potential for disaster in Dorset.

    Fast forward 13 years later, and of course, the major incident in the harbour unfortunately vindicated Pooley’s warning. Environmental campaigners have continued to echo this since the 2023 spill. As the Canary previously reported, local Green Party politician and environmental activist Chris Rigby said at the time of the incident that it had been an “accident waiting to happen”.

    In particular, Rigby was citing Perenco’s pollution record since it took over the onshore oil field. Crucially, Perenco has presided over ten pollution incidents at the site between 2011 and 2020.

    Now, the Canary can reveal that Perenco has reported another incident since the spill took place in March 2023.

    Through a Freedom of Information request to the Environment Agency, we found that Perenco had breached its permit conditions. More specifically, the company reported exceeding the limits of nitrogen oxide emissions it is licensed to emit to the air from the gas engines on site.

    While comparatively minor, the fault and resulting pollution perhaps show that even on high alert after a major spill, the company can’t guarantee further failures – with all the potentially hazardous consequences for people and nature nearby.

    Perenco disaster in Gabon

    On top of calling for Perenco to leave the Wytch Farm site, the activists drew parallels with its operations in the Global South.

    As the Canary previously outlined, the company is responsible for a litany of environmental and social harms across the planet. So unsurprisingly, less than a week before its Poole Harbour spill year anniversary the company hit headlines for a fatal accident in Gabon.

    On Wednesday 20 March, a fire on a Perenco-operated offshore rig off the coast of the central African nation killed five workers. A further worker is still missing.

    XR BCP member Helen Nicol told the Canary that the accident Perenco is responsible for in Gabon made their protest “especially important”. She said that the spill in Poole Harbour last year had been eye-opening:

    because initially we were focused incredibly locally and then we started looking further afield. We realised what was happening in the DRC, what was happening in Peru, Ecuador, Gabon, and the Caribbean – and it just seems that Perenco have a policy of disregard for their workers, for the lands that they’re based in, and for the whole world.

    If they can cut a corner, they will cut a corner – they’re not safe, they’re not safe in Poole Harbour, and they’re not safe anywhere else.

    Again, she attributed this to Perenco’s business model. Specifically, she referenced how it buys up older oil and gas fields from other companies:

    The strategy they have of taking end of life oil wells and then trying to drag the very last drop of profit out of it, regardless of the consequences to the surrounding landscape and the people who live around them and the people who work for them is disgusting – and they need to stop.

    A representative of Gabon’s space agency has previously corroborated this concern. The representative told media outlet Investigate Europe that despite causing pollution in offshore Atlantic sites:

    They kept on pumping anyway, even though their aging system requires huge maintenance work

    Activists “shine a light” on Perenco’s risky business

    Given the latest incident in Gabon, Nicol therefore said that the group would continue:

    to shine a light on their practices, and keep highlighting the fact that they are not a safe pair of hands.

    Ultimately, the groups want to put a stop to its risky business in Poole and beyond. Activists see Perenco’s Wytch Farm as a significant first target.

    East Dorset Friends of the Earth Martin Price told the Canary that the Climate Change Committee had been clear:

    the government’s main advisor is saying we must totally divest from fossil fuels within the next 16 years. Now, if we’re to do that, we have to start now.

    As such, Price argued:

    Where better to start than in one of the most environmentally sensitive, one of the most rewarding in terms of international status sites in England, and possibly even in parts of Western Europe.

    In stark contrast however, Perenco has also shown no signs of slowing down at the site.

    In 2023, it drilled a new bore from an existing well. Dorset County Council licensed this particular well bore to pump out oil until December 2031. What’s more, for 2024 alone, the company plans to submit applications to drill five new wells on-site.

    Moreover, it has made early rumblings of its intention to use Wytch Farm for carbon capture and storage (CCS). CCS is a notorious fossil fuel industry palatability ploy to make continued extraction appear socially and environmentally compatible.

    At the end of the day then, it’s just another fossil fuel company gaslighting communities and nature into oblivion. Extending the life of its oil and gas business comes over protecting the lives of people and the planet every time. But the local climate community in Dorset will continue to mobilise against it.

    At this latest protest, groups successfully held the profiteering company’s feet to the fire. Crucially, activists articulated that the only way to truly guarantee “no repeat” of a spill like the incident in Poole Harbour, is “Perenco out”, in the UK and everywhere, for good.

    Featured image and additional images via Hannah Sharland and Extinction Rebellion Bournemouth, Christchurch, and Poole.

    By Hannah Sharland

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Law, which has in effect silenced opposition, comes into force with penalties of up to life in prison for treason and insurrection

    Hong Kong’s new national security law came into force on Saturday, putting into immediate effect tough penalties of up to life imprisonment for crimes including treason and insurrection.

    The law – commonly referred to as article 23 – targets five categories of national security crimes, and was swiftly passed by Hong Kong’s opposition-free legislature on Tuesday.

    Continue reading…

    This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.

  • On Saturday 23 March, Palestine campaigners will gather outside the new Elbit Horizon H2 factory in Bristol to protest against the company’s complicity in the genocide currently ongoing in Gaza.

    Elbit: complicit in genocide

    Elbit Systems UK is owned by Israel’s largest weapons firm, which markets its weaponry as “battle-tested” after they’re developed through assaults on the Palestinian people.

    The Israeli weapons maker manufactures 85% of Israel’s military drone fleet and land-based equipment, as well as missiles, bombs and bullets. Elbit’s CEO Bazhalel Machlis, who sits on the board of Elbit Systems UK, boasted of how the Israeli military has thanked the company for their “crucial” services during the ongoing genocide in Gaza.

    Since 7 October, Israel has killed over 31,000 Palestinians, injured over 73,000, and displaced the vast majority of Gaza.

    In Bristol, as Campaign Against Arms Trade (CAAT) wrote:

    This ‘research, development and manufacturing hub for high technology solutions’ was opened in July 2023 by the Israeli ambassador, Tzipi Hotovely, and local Tory MP Jack Lopresti. It is the second Elbit Systems facility in Bristol, the other being at 600 Aztec West

    As the Canary recently reported, Palestine Action is currently camping outside Elbit’s HQ at 600 Aztec West in Bristol.

    Bristol taking action

    Now, Bristol Palestine Alliance (BPA) has organised a day of action.

    People can gather from 12:30pm at Elbit’s factory. The full address is Belvedere Close (off Bolingbroke Way) Little Stoke, Bristol BS34 6FE:

    The protest will run as follows:

    12.30pm: workshop – people will make bunting from children’s clothes, write names-of-the-dead onto labels, and assemble “baby bundles” resembling bodies of the dead in Gaza. Children will also be chalking slogans and pictures on the tarmac at the entrance of the factory.

    1pm: rally – including speakers: Rowland Dye – Palestinian Rights Campaigner; Nora el Gohary – Local Bristolian originally from Egypt; Mike Jempson – Journalist & Co Founder of the Mediawise Trust; Diana Slim – Hospital doctor; Peter Oswald – Poet and dramatist from “Naming the Dead”; Aisha Deeney – School pupil, activist; Professor Ron Rendel – Jewish American activist for Palestinian Rights; Susie Luger – Campaigner for Palestinian rights; Zoe Goodman – Independent Councillor.

    In addition to the above, there will be a message of support from Ronnie Barkan – who recently stood trial as part of the Elbit-7 for direct action at the Aztec West Elbit site, and a message of support from Andrew Feinstein, arms trade expert and Jewish member of the post-Apartheid ANC government in South Africa.

    2pm: photos – the attending crowd will pose for a group photo holding a giant horizontal “STOP ARMING ISRAEL” banner across the entrance of the factory. People will also hold up baby-bundles, children’s clothes bunting, name-labels, etc.

    2.15pm: an “act of defiance” – crowd will defy security guards and march forward towards the factory gates to lay down baby-bundles, plus to hang children’s clothes bunting & name-labels onto the gates and the fence.

    2.30pm “We Shall Overcome” – The crowd will sing the 1960’s Civil Rights anthem.

    Featured image via Bristol Palestine Alliance

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • On Friday 22 March, people gathered outside the Royal Courts of Justice to hand deliver a letter to the Lady Chief Justice, Baroness Carr. You can read it here. It was calling for the suspension of Judge Silas Reid for threatening a jury with criminal proceedings in a trial concerning a group of climate activists:

    In an unprecedented move, more than 1,800 people first submitted a complaint to the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office, before delivering the letter calling for Judge Reid’s suspension pending the outcome of that investigation. The letter has also been copied to Alex Chalk MP, the Lord Chancellor, whose consent is required before a judge can be suspended.

    Basis of the complaint

    The complaint focusses on statements made by Judge Reid concerning a trial of five women who broke windows at JP Morgan Bank, the leading financier of fossil fuel projects around the world, at the end of February this year.

    Following a pattern of jury acquittals of environmental defenders who had taken similar action, Judge Reid used his public position to cast doubt on the reality of the climate crisis. He said:

    The circumstances of the damage do not include any climate crisis which may or may not exist in the world at the moment … Whether climate change is as dangerous as each of the defendants may clearly and honestly believe or is not, is irrelevant and does not form any part of the circumstances of the damage.

    Contrary to the fundamental, democratic principle of jury independence (also known as ‘jury equity’ or ‘jury nullification’), he then threatened the jury with criminal charges if they applied their conscience to the facts of the case:

    It is only on the evidence you are able to try the case and not on conscience … It is a criminal offence for a juror to do anything from which it can be concluded that a decision will be made on anything other than the evidence.

    Judge Reid: a ‘dangerous embarrassment’

    Lead signatories to the letters explain this unprecedented intervention below. Professional rules of conduct make it difficult for practising barristers to speak out, but a leading criminal law KC, talking anonymously to Private Eye, said:

    I’ve never encountered a judge threatening jurors in the way that Judge Silas Reid did. That suggests a clear determination by him to deter them from returning a verdict independently and without fear of punishment.

    Melinda Janki, a Guyana-based lawyer, winner of the Commonwealth Lawyers Rule of Law Award, 2023, and one of the signatories, said:

    The rule of law means that no-one is above the law, and that includes judges. I have a message to Judge Reid from Georgetown, Guyana.

    We here are going to be underwater with 1.5˚C warming. It’s an abuse of judicial office to suggest that the breakdown of the global climate system could be belief or opinion.

    It’s madness to send environmental defenders to prison just for using the words ‘climate change’ in court.

    It’s unlawful to threaten a jury with criminal charges for applying their conscience to a case. The rule of law depends on accountability for judges who abuse their powers, which is why I’m joining the call for an investigation into Judge Reid’s conduct.

    Charles Secrett, former director of Friends of the Earth, said:

    Judge Silas Reid is a shocking example of how ignorant even the most learned man can be with his quasi-blasphemous rejection of the fundamental rights of juries and defendants, the objective rule of compassionate law, and the unavoidable primacy of climate science.

    He is an antiquated, confused and dangerous embarrassment to the legal profession. He should be ‘dis-robed’ and removed from office at once.

    Professor James E. Hansen, the former NASA scientist and ‘godfather of climate science’, said:

    The cruelty of such ‘know nothing’ judges is not so much to the defendant as it is to our children and grandchildren.

    A history of Judge Reid’s controversy

    This is not the first time Judge Reid has courted controversy with his judicial war against those who know the climate crisis to be real and dare to do something about it.

    Last year he imprisoned three people just for mentioning the words ‘climate change’ and ‘fuel poverty’ in his courtroom, defying his ban on the use of those terms.

    At about the same time, he threatened a Guardian journalist with contempt of court, on the basis that the journalist’s presence in court, at the same time that people broke his order on what words they could use, suggested he was ‘in on it’.

    He also had Trudi Warner, a 68 year-old retired social worker, arrested for upholding a sign outside court setting out the principle of jury equity. He then referred 24 more people to the Attorney General for doing the same thing.

    Curiously, Judge Reid takes a more lenient approach to men who violently assault women.

    In 2018 he gave a community order to an insurance broker who fractured the jaw of a female friend in three places after punching her in the face. Previously he sentenced a man who had left a woman with permanent scarring, after striking her in the face with a bicycle D-lock, to a suspended sentence and a compensation order of £115.

    Yet another UN intervention

    In February, the UN published a major international report, State repression of environmental protest and civil disobedience: a major threat to human rights and democracy. Although it does not refer to Judge Reid by name, it alludes to his actions in the following key passages:

    In the UK, courts have prohibited environmental protesters from putting forward defenses based on “necessity” or “proportionality”. They have also forbidden protesters from mentioning climate change, thereby preventing them from explaining the reasons for their protest. Courts have held convicted environmental defenders who disregarded this prohibition in “contempt of court” and imprisoned them for up to 8 weeks…

    Courts should not impose limitations on environmental protesters’ right to a defense, including to explain their motivation for engaging in protest, and should take into account these motivations in their decisions.

    Having been threatened by the Judge with criminal proceedings if they applied their conscience to the case, the jury, contrary to the trend in previous similar cases, found the women guilty. They will be sentenced in June. Judge Reid has indicated the sentence will be custodial but may be suspended.

    More to this story than meets the eye?

    In principle, Judge Reid’s threats to the jury could form a ground of appeal against conviction. But whether to appeal is a matter for the five women and their lawyers, and may depend on personal and tactical considerations. The possibility of appeal provides no general accountability to the public, for actions which threaten democracy and the rule of law.

    Since it is only the Lady Chief Justice that has the power to suspend a judge, it is notable that she herself published a judgement on Monday 18 March, which implied the climate crisis was simply a matter of opinion.

    Since Reid expressed a similar position just ahead of this ruling, two explanations present themselves. Either Judge Reid got wind of the Court of Appeal’s ruling before anyone else. Or climate crisis scepticism is endemic across the judiciary, whose lead members dine at the male only Garrick Club alongside Michael Gove and Jacob Rees-Mogg.

    Featured image and additional images via Plan B

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • A group of civil society organisations are seeking assurances from the Met Police that the force will take a more common sense and less heavy-handed approach to pro-Palestine demonstrations in the capital. It’s called out what it says is the influence of “the media, government and pro-Israel lobby” in cops making decisions.

    The Met: performing “politicised policing”?

    In a joint letter to Met chief Sir Mark Rowley, the 14 organisations question the politicised way in which protests are being handled which they say risks eroding public confidence in the police. It says:

    In view of the recent dismissal of a prosecution against a pro-Palestine protestor we the undersigned are seeking reassurances that the Metropolitan Police will relent on its heavy-handed and highly politicised policing of demonstrations against the genocide in Gaza.

    The letter comes after the recent dismissal of a prosecution against a pro-Palestine protestor who was arrested and charged with failing to comply with a requirement to remove a face covering at a protest on 14 October 2023.

    However, on 28 February, the City of London Magistrate’s Court dismissed the case against Ibrahim Hlaiyil, 38, saying there was no evidence to support a prosecution. The trial is summarised here. As the letter noted:

    In dismissing the charge, the judge said: “There is no evidence to prove the essential element of the charge.” The judge stated that the arresting officer seemed to have taken the view that he was able to arrest anyone who refused to take off their face mask at the protest.

    The law actually only allows for arrest if a person is wearing a face covering for the purpose of concealing their identity, something that the police did not argue in court.

    Influenced by media, politicians, and the “pro-Israel lobby”

    The Met Police publicised and portrayed this arrest as part of a crackdown on violent protesters. However, the dismissal of the charge against Hlaiyil highlights both the heavy-handed and politicised way in which pro-Palestine protests are being policed in the capital.

    As the letter states:

    It also highlights a lack of operational independence and a propensity to be influenced by the highly inflammatory and politicised representation of these demonstrations by their detractors in the media, government and pro-Israel lobby.

    The full text of the letter can be read here.

    The signatories are:

    • Islamic Human Rights Commission.
    • 5 Pillars.
    • Black Activists Rising Against Cuts.
    • Black Lives Matter Coalition UK.
    • Convivencia Alliance.
    • Fight Racism! Fight Imperialism!
    • InMinds Human Rights Group.
    • Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions – UK.
    • Jewish Network for Palestine.
    • Muslim Public Affairs Committee UK.
    • Peacemaker Trust.
    • Scotland Against Criminalising Communities.
    • Spinwatch/Public Interest Investigations.
    • The Campaign Against Misrepresentation in Public Affairs, Information and the News (CAMPAIN).

    Featured image via Sir Mark Rowley – LinkedIn

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • On Thursday 21 March in Basildon Crown Court, Just Stop Oil tunnellers Samuel Johnson, Larch Maxey, Joe Howlett, and Autumn Wharrie were found guilty over their occupation. The four are expecting to be sentenced in June. The verdict came is as cops were also arresting other Just Stop Oil activists – thanks to a snitch hack at the Daily Mail. One of them even stood as an MP candidate in the Rochdale by-election – and is a vicar.

    Just Stop Oil tunnellers guilty – of standing up to big oil

    First, the Just Stop Oil Essex tunnellers took action in August 2022, demanding the UK government immediately halts all licensing and consents for new fossil fuel exploration and extraction:

    Just Stop Oil tunnellers

    The group took action by occupying tunnels dug under the road leading to the Navigator Oil Terminal in Thurrock, Essex. This occurred simultaneously with three other tunneling actions in Essex and Warwickshire, as well as occupations of oil trucks and terminals overground. These combined efforts massively impacted the flow and operation of oil in the UK at the time.

    A sixth person, Xavier Trimmer-Gonzalez, took action with this group, but died in 2023 after spending time in prison following his actions with Insulate Britain and Just Stop Oil. A two minute silence was observed during the trial to show respect to his memory.

    Sam Johnson said today:

    I’m Sam, a construction worker from Essex and I took action simply because we have run out of time. We have known for longer than I’ve been alive what would happen if we kept burning fossil fuels – and now we are seeing this catastrophe unfold in real time. I have a nephew who is seven years old who I love to bits. As long as I have breath in my lungs I will fight to protect his future.

    The group remained in the 52-foot tunnel for 13 days. At the time, Chief Constable of Essex Police, BJ Harrington, recognised in a statement that the climate crisis is a “serious concern”. However, Essex police put the lives of the action takers and motorists at risk by opening the roads over the tunnel.

    At the time, action taker Joe Howlett said:

    The climate crisis is caused by a very small minority of people and it’s those same people who are currently profiteering from the cost of living crisis. That’s why I’ve spent the last 10 days living in a tunnel under a road leading to the Navigator oil terminal in Essex.

    Then, over the past 48 hours, two Just Stop Oil supporters have been unexpectedly held by the police for conspiracy to commit burglary:

    Cops now arresting parliamentary candidates

    Rosa Hicks from London, was walking home from a community event in Camden at around 9pm on Wednesday 20 March when a Met Police vehicle pulled up and she was forced into the van by six officers. As of 4pm on 21 March she is still being held at Islington Police Station.

    On Tuesday 19 March, Reverend Mark Coleman (who stood as a candidate in the Rochdale by-election) was arrested outside his home in Rochdale at around 5:15pm by plainclothes officers, and taken to Bury custody suite. At 9:26pm that day, PC Jonathan Fryer and Detective Constable Philip O’Connor from the Public Order Crime Unit at Lambeth interviewed Reverend Coleman.

    They described intelligence that they had gained from reading a Daily Mail article which claimed that Just Stop Oil supporters planned to occupy the homes and offices of MPs. The article came about because a journalist infiltrated Just Stop Oil.

    Cops questioned Reverend Coleman about his political activities.

    WTF is this?

    Reverend Coleman has made the following comment:

    Their line of questioning went like this: ‘Who are the other members of Just Stop Oil involved – is one of them Phoebe? Why did you stand for election in Rochdale? What does “occupy” mean? Do you intend to occupy? Does anyone intend to occupy? Do you intend to cause damage? Do you intend to intimidate? What types of criminal damage are you intending?’

    ‘How did you do at the election? What agenda did you have for standing? What would you do had you won? Did you run on a no new oil ticket? What else were you going to do? Would you sit in a politician’s office? Would you occupy the Palace of Westminster legitimately and then illegitimately protest? Do you believe that this is democracy in action? Do you know that several members of Parliament have been killed? What do you think is a reasonable or likely outcome for MPs? Do you think that activities leading to the death of MPs is a reasonable strategy for JSO?’

    They said my bail conditions would prevent me attending the homes and offices of MPs or parliamentary candidates. A clerical error means my bail conditions only restrict me from attending their homes – which is not something I have ever done. But being instructed not to go to MPs offices or the offices of those standing for parliament rather excludes me from the democratic processes. It was a privilege to stand for parliament in the recent by-election. I have committed no crime – why am I being excluded from playing a part in the normal political life of the place where I live?

    On the morning of 6 March, Just Stop Oil supporter Phoebe Plummer was arrested by plainclothes officers in Vauxhall for ‘conspiracy to commit burglary.’ She was interviewed and held for a short time at Walworth Custody Suite before being released later that day.

    On 14 March, she and Rosa Hicks delivered a letter to the home of Emily Thornberry. The pair asked the police officer stationed outside: “We’re here to post a letter, is that OK?”, to which the police officer replied: “You can post the letter, yeah, I can’t stop you from posting a letter”. Afterwards Phoebe was arrested again, for breach of bail conditions she was given on 6 March.

    Featured image and additional images via Just Stop Oil 

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • On Wednesday 20 March, activists from Palestine Action set up camp in front of Elbit’s Bristol headquarters at Aztec West 600. It comes after the group targeted Somerset Council over its complicity in Elbit and Israel‘s genocide – as it is the former’s landlord.

    Palestine Action: a base of resistance

    Establishing a base of resistance, activists have put up gazebos, banners, Palestine flags, and scaled up trees overlooking the Israeli weapons maker:

    The camp is the latest in a series of actions to kick Elbit out of Aztec West 600. It’s a premises which is owned by Somerset Council. Since Palestine Action’s launch in July 2020, activists have broken inside the arms manufacturer, occupied the roof, blockaded the gates, and dismantled the premises.

    Simultaneously, residents of Somerset have taken several actions to demand Somerset Council terminate Elbit’s lease before they sell the property. It’s sale which is motivated by financial pressure on the council. Residents have repeatedly disrupted council meetings in a bid to make their voices heard and reject their county’s complicity in genocide.

    After requests to evict Elbit were dismissed by councillors, activists covered Somerset County Hall in red paint and spray painted messages such as ‘Elbit out’, ‘Evict Elbit’ and ‘Blood on your hands’:

    The newly established camp will apply further pressure on the council and reduce the prospect of any future sale without first evicting Elbit.

    Elbit: staggering complicity.

    Elbit Systems is Israel’s biggest weapons manufacturer, whose UK division is headquartered at Aztec West 600, with both Elbit Systems UK and Elbit Systems Ltd (based in Haifa, Israel) listed as named parties on the lease. Providing 85% of Israel’s military drone fleet and land-based equipment, as well as bullets, bombs, munitions and other weaponry, the company is a key pillar of the ongoing genocide in Gaza.

    By using Gaza as a laboratory for new weaponry, Elbit can market their products as “battle-tested” or “combat proven” before selling them on to global militaries. Both the export and purchase of Elbit’s weaponry maintains the illegal occupation and subjugation of the Palestinian people.

    Palestine Action vow to continue to take action until Elbit is out of Aztec West 600, and ultimately out of Britain.

    Featured image and additional images via Palestine Action

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Thousands of people have vowed not to bank with Barclays until it ends its complicity with Israel‘s genocide and apartheid. On Thursday 21 March, over 1,000 people cancelled their accounts with the criminal bank – coming on top of thousands more than have already done so.

    Barclays: end the complicity with Israel

    UK banking giant Barclays is once again the target of mass boycott campaign, organised by the Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC). More than 1,000 people closed their accounts on 21 March in protest at its bankrolling of Israel’s genocidal attack on Palestinians.

    Thousands more have signed a pledge never to bank with Barclays while it remains complicit with Israel’s apartheid system. The bank faced a similar boycott campaign over its financial support for South African apartheid before eventually being forced to divest in 1986. You can join the boycott here.

    Barclays Bank holds over £1bn in shares and provides over £3bn in loans and underwriting to nine companies whose weapons, components, and military technology are being used by Israel in its genocidal attacks on Palestinians.

    This includes General Dynamics, which produces the gun systems that arm the fighter jets used by Israel to bombard Gaza, and Elbit Systems, which produces armoured drones, munitions, and artillery weapons used by the Israeli military.

    By providing investment and financial services to these arms companies, Barclays is facilitating the provision of weapons and technology for Israel’s attacks on Palestinians.

    Nothing changes

    This mass account closure day falls on the UN Day for Elimination of Racial Discrimination. It is commemorated on the anniversary of the Sharpeville massacre in 1960, during which South African police killed 69 black protesters demonstrating against apartheid laws.

    During this time, Barclays faced a sustained boycott campaign over its financial support for South African apartheid before eventually being forced to withdraw in 1986.

    Campaigners say that, once again, Barclays will be forced to end its complicity in apartheid:

    This second mass account closure day is part of an on-going campaign aimed at highlighting Barclays toxic banking policies that make it complicit with Israel’s war crimes. Barclays will continue be the target of social media campaigns, pickets, and sit ins until it is forced to prioritise humanity over profit.

    Boycott Barclays

    Ben Jamal, PSC director, said :

    More than 31,000 Palestinians have been killed by Israel’s assault on the Gaza Strip, in what the International Court of Justice has accepted is a plausible case of genocide.

    UN experts have warned that Gaza is facing imminent famine due to Israel’s blockade and attacks. To its eternal shame, Barclays is complicit, financing the companies that supply Israel with the weapons and military technology it uses to carry out its attacks.

    Barclays was forced to stop supporting apartheid in South Africa before, and we’ll force it to stop supporting Israel’s genocide and apartheid now.

    Featured image via PSC

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.


  • This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Radio Free Asia.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Over 50 Students at Manchester University are occupying the Simon Building in solidarity with Palestinians facing Israel‘s genocide in Gaza – with the university being complicit.

    Manchester University: complicit in genocide

    They are demanding that the university ends its partnership with BAE Systems and other arms companies, cuts its ties with Tel Aviv University and the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, and stops what they call all “unethical research”:

    Students accuse the university’s senior management of complicity in the genocide of Palestinians. They say the university has failed to take any action over its extensive ties to Israel despite the International Court of Justice ruling that Israel is plausibly committing a genocide:

    Manchester University Israel

    The occupation demands are that Manchester University must:

    • End its partnership with BAE Systems.
    • Cut ties with Tel Aviv University and the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
    • Adopt a policy ensuring that all research is ethical and doesn’t contribute towards the arms trade.

    The evidence stacks up

    Tel Aviv University, which Manchester University has a research partnership with, developed the Dahiya Doctrine. This calls for the targeting of civilian infrastructure to bring pressure on Palestinians, rather than targeting armed groups.

    The Hebrew University of Jerusalem is built on illegally occupied land, with exchange students from Manchester University sent to live in these settlements.

    BAE Systems is Europe’s largest arms company and is involved in producing F-35 and F-16 jets which are used against Palestinians in Gaza. Manchester University has no policy regulating whether research could be used to harm lives or for other unethical purposes. Moreover, it has received at least £15m in research funding from arms companies in the last five years.

    So, the Simon Building is being occupied by at least 50 students:

    It marks the one year anniversary of when students were forcefully evicted from the Simon Building during protests related to the Rent Strikes.

    Manchester University: joining others around England

    This occupation coincides with actions at other universities. These include Goldsmiths, Leeds, UCL, Bristol, and Nottingham. Students will be holding workshops and other public events over the next few days to demand a change in direction from Manchester University.

    Last week, vice chancellor Nancy Rothwell was recorded denying that arms companies are unethical. Students have been protesting for months, including a one night occupation in November, with no response to requests for negotiations from any of Manchester University’s senior management.

    A spokesperson for Manchester Leftist Action said:

    Manchester University has left us with no choice but to escalate this campaign. This is a wake-up call that students will continue taking action until our University’s complicity in genocide is ended.

    Featured image and additional images via Manchester Leftist Action

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Over 150 non-profit organisations have called out the influence of big oil at this year’s upcoming climate crisis negotiations in Azerbaijan. The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC) will hold the COP29 international climate summit in Baku in November.

    In an open letter, a global coalition led by 350.org and Oil Change International raised their grave concerns about clear conflict of interest in the COP29 organising committee. Specifically, the coalition of groups has singled out host Azerbaijan’s choice to include its state oil company president Rovshan Najaf as a member.

    COP29 host ramps up fossil fuels

    Azerbaijan’s state oil company, SOCAR, plans to expand fossil fuel production. Moreover, a Global Witness analysis from January found that the country is set to ramp up gas production by a third over the next decade. This will see Azerbaijan take production from 37bn cubic metres in 2024, to 49bn cubic metres in 2033.

    Overall, Global Witness estimated that fossil fuel companies would plough US $41.4bn to extract 411bn cubic metres of Azeri gas. Notably, it said that this could pay the cost of installing more than 1,170 offshore wind turbines, and emit 781m tonnes of carbon dioxide – or twice the annual emissions of the UK.

    Given this, the signatories of the open letter called Azerbaijan out. It read:

    Despite Azerbaijan being a party to the Paris Agreement, having endorsed the UAE consensus and accepted the findings of the IPCC, SOCAR plans to expand its fossil fuel production, which is incompatible with the objective of limiting warming to 1.5°C, and lacks a clear and credible strategy to transition away from fossil fuels.

    In short, SOCAR’s plans contradict the Paris Climate Agreement – the arguable cornerstone of the COP climate negotiations.

    COPs lead by compromised petrostates

    Of course, it wouldn’t be the first time the summits host’s actions has run counter to climate goals. Azerbaijan follow intransigent fossil fuel devotees such as the United Arab Emirates, Egypt, and the United Kingdom to the table.

    As the Canary’s Tracy Keeling reported, the UK’s COP26 welcomed 503 fossil fuel lobbyists into the fold. Now of course, the UK’s Tory-led government has abandoned even the slimmest pretence of keeping to its climate goals, and plans to increase gas production.

    Likewise, Egypt escalated fossil fuel lobbyist entry into the summit, granting 636 delegates access. Again, the country has boosted fossil fuel production in recent years.

    However, the UAE’s COP28 took this to new heights when it allowed 2,456 corporate fossil fuel lobbyists into the conference. Worse still, UAE national oil company Adnoc’s head sultan Al Jaber acted as the country’s COP28 president-designate. Notoriously, Al Jaber championed the role of fossil fuels, arguing they would be needed for the “forseeable future”.

    The signatories to the open letter acknowledged this, stating:

    We are further aware that Azerbaijan is not the first fossil fuel producing country to host a COP. At COP28. At COP28, global civil society criticized the nomination of Sultan Al Jaber as COP president in order to protect the global climate talks from the influence of the fossil fuel industry.

    Now, another oil exec threatens to derail the next annual summit.

    More oil execs and employees

    Specifically, Azerbaijan has included SOCAR president Rovshan Najaf in the COP29 organising committee. As Climate Home News reported, the group also includes the head of state energy company Azerenergy’s Balababa Rzayev.

    Initially, civil society groups additionally heavily criticised the committee for consisting of men only. After this, Azerbaijan added 12 women to the previously all-male committee.

    Moreover, COP29 marks a consecutive summit putting a fossil fuel veteran at the helm of negotiations. Following in predecessor Al Jaber footsteps, former long-term state oil company employee-turned minister of ecology and natural resources Mukhtar Babayev is heading the key summit.

    As such, the open letter argued that:

    The inclusion of the president of the state oil company in the COP29 organizing committee presents a significant conflict of interest. The credibility of the COP29 presidency, already weakened by your historic ties to the oil and gas industry, risks being further jeopardized by this decision.

    Repressive states

    On top of this, the open letter further expressed deep concerns over civil society’s freedom of speech, peaceful assembly, and human rights in the COP29 host country Azerbaijan. The groups noted that:

    in Azerbaijan, peaceful protests are repressed and independent organizations and media outlets face excessive restrictions in law and practice. Just last week, Azerbaijani authorities conducted raids on local media offices and detained a dozen journalists and other civil society members.

    Such tactics are routinely used by the government of Azerbaijan to silence civil society, especially those who speak out about corruption and environmental harms in the oil industry – like Gubad Ibadoghlu , who has been imprisoned for over six months.

    In particular, the organisations highlighted that the inclusion of two further members to the organising committee was “highly problematic” and could create a “chilling effect”. These include Ilgar Musayev, the head of the country’s Service of Special Communication and Information Security and chief of the state’s security service Ali Naghiyev.

    Naturally, human rights organisations have raised similar concerns at previous COPs.

    Egypt’s mass arbitrary detention of hundreds of activists in the weeks leading up to COP27 set the stage for its surveillance and suppression of civil society voices.

    Then, climate justice groups highlighted the similarly autocratic UAE’s repressive protest laws and poor human rights record ahead of the negotiations in 2023.

    So, for the upcoming negotiations, the open letter called for clarification of state security and the special communication and information security services’ role during COP29. Head of public engagement at 350.org Namrata Chowdhary said:

    The climate movement has steadfastly held the line at climate negotiations, COP after COP after COP, pushing political leaders to drive the transformational change in climate policy we urgently need to see. But for three years in a row, these UN climate talks are hosted in countries where the interests of the fossil fuel industry are given precedence over those of people and the planet.

    Worse still, they exercise their authority to deliberately exclude the voices of the people most directly impacted by climate change, and threaten our right to push for the solutions we need.

    Chowdhary added that:

    Inviting the heads of oil companies and the secret service onto the organising committee sends a clear signal to civil society – that we will be held at a distance, and our influence limited.

    A “deep stake in seeing climate action fail”

    The letter was originally signed and sent by the executive directors of 350.org, Oil Change International, Action Aid, and CIEL. Since then, organisations representing youth, environmental, human rights, and Indigenous groups from over 50 countries and six continents have signed on.

    However, COP29 president-designate Mukhtar Babayev still hasn’t responded.

    Global policy manager with Oil Change International Romain Ioualalen said:

    The upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference must be the COP that starts implementing a full, fast, fair, and funded transition away from fossil fuels, after the promises made in Dubai.

    Yet, this will be the second COP in a row that is run by someone with deep ties to the oil and gas industry, which has a deep stake in seeing climate action fail. The recent inclusion of the President of the State Oil Company of the Republic of Azerbaijan (SOCAR) on the core COP29 team sends yet another profoundly negative signal on the potential capture of crucial climate talks by the oil and gas industry.

    Additionally, Ioualalen added:

    The COP29 presidency was heavily criticized for failing to ensure gender balance on its organizing committee and should therefore know that its choices will be scrutinized globally.

    But, like with their correction of adding women to the committee, after introducing an all male panel earlier this year, it is not too late to separate oil company interest from the most important climate change conference of the year.

    Needless to say however, the petrostate architects of climate dither and delay have shown again that they will likely bring more “blah, blah, blah” to COP29. Of course, it wouldn’t be a climate summit without it.

    Feature image via EnerSol/Youtube

    By Hannah Sharland

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • An app-based workers union representing over 100,000 Uber drivers and other app-based drivers across 20 countries have united to boycott Chevron-branded gas stations, including Texaco and Caltex, in alignment with the Palestinian BDS National Committee (BNC) campaign and the call for solidarity by Palestine trade unions.

    Chevron: feeling the force of BDS

    The International Alliance of App-Based Transport Workers (IAATW) is a global federation representing over 100,000 drivers and couriers across 20 countries and six continents, including South Africa, Nigeria, Ghana, Mexico, Panama, Chile, Costa Rica, Uruguay, Argentina, USA, Canada, Sri Lanka, India, Bangladesh, Indonesia, Malaysia, Cambodia, France, Australia, and the U.K.

    At its bi-annual international conference in Colombo, Sri Lanka, IAATW delegates unanimously passed motions showing their unequivocal support for Palestine and commitment to actions in line with the boycott, divestment, and sanctions (BDS) movement and the unprecedented call from more than 30 Palestinian trade unions.

    The BNC said:

    The BDS movement reiterates its call on supporters of Palestinian rights and climate justice, particularly workers and labor unions, to escalate divestment and boycott campaigns against Chevron (and all its gas stations…

    This motion reiterated IAATW’s statement from October 2023 and committed to concrete action by adopting the BDS call against oil companies complicit in Israel’s occupation.

    Apartheid and genocide

    As part of these solidarity efforts, IAATW drivers pledged to boycott Chevron-branded gas stations, including Texaco and Caltex, operating in all IAATW member countries. The union believes that refusing to support entities complicit in perpetuating injustices against Palestinians is a critical step towards justice and accountability.

    Chevron has generated billions of dollars in revenue for apartheid Israel as the leading “international actor extracting gas claimed by Israel in the Eastern Mediterranean” – helping to fund the ongoing genocide against 2.3 million Palestinians in Gaza.

    Chevron is directly involved in Israel’s policy and practice of depriving the Palestinian people of their right to sovereignty over their natural resources.

    Chevron: complicit

    IAATW said:

    Inspired by the 1987 oil embargo against Shell for its role in South African apartheid, we, the app-based passenger transport sector for companies such as Uber, Deliveroo, JustEat, Free Now, Glovo, Lyft, Grab, DoorDash, Grubhub, Amazon, Ola, Gojek, Didi, Bolt, Careems, reiterate Palestinians’ calls for action and pledge to boycott the thousands of Chevron, Texaco, and Caltex gas and petrol stations worldwide.

    To build this campaign within IAATW and beyond, delegates also committed to reaching out and working with other app-based transport unions to encourage them to echo these demands and organise an international education day.

    IAATW noted:

    Finally, IAATW pledges to investigate and take action against app companies utilising Israeli technology complicit in the genocide perpetrated against Palestinians.

    IAATW stands in solidarity with the Palestinian people and the Palestinian labour movement and their struggle for national liberation; we reiterate calls for an immediate ceasefire and an end to Israeli apartheid and military occupation and call on other labour unions to do the same.

    You can find out more about the BDS Chevron campaign here.

    Featured image via the BNC

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • A Lib Dem-led council in Somerset is facing the wrath of local residents and activists over its complicity in Israel‘s ongoing genocide in Gaza. This is because the council is the landlord of one of the biggest arms manufacturers supplying the colonialist state with weapons.

    Lib Dem Somerset council: complicit in genocide

    Lib Dem-led Somerset Council is the landlord of Aztec West 600, the headquarters of Elbit Systems UK. Elbit Systems UK is owned by Israel’s largest weapons firm, which markets its weaponry as “battle-tested” after they’re developed through assaults on the Palestinian people.

    The Israeli weapons maker manufactures 85% of Israel’s military drone fleet and land-based equipment, as well as missiles, bombs and bullets. Elbit’s CEO Bazhalel Machlis, who sits on the board of Elbit Systems UK, boasted of how the Israeli military has thanked the company for their “crucial” services during the ongoing genocide in Gaza.

    Since 7 October, Israel has killed over 31,000 Palestinians, injured over 73,000, and displaced the vast majority of Gaza. By being Elbit’s landlords, the Lib Dems are complicit in this.

    Direct action

    So, supporters of Palestine Action have taken direct action against the Lib Dem-led council. On Monday 18 March, the doused the council offices in red paint:

    Activists also wrote some home truths on the brickwork:

    As the Canary has reported, on two previous occasions, Somerset residents have disrupted Lib Dem-led council meetings urging for immediate action to be taken and for Elbit’s lease to be terminated. Amidst financial issues, the council has made plans to sell all of their commercial properties including Aztec West 600.

    The Lib Dem-led council issued a predictably snivelling response, saying:

    While we respect the right of individuals and groups to protest, we strongly condemn this criminal damage on a Grade II-listed public building which will need to be removed at taxpayers’ expense.

    Moreover, residents have repeatedly emphasised that selling the property doesn’t absolve the council of its responsibility, and before any sale takes place the council must evict Elbit from its property.

    Lib Dem council still on Palestine Action’s hit list

    As the Lib Dem-led council has not yet taken such action, they remain on Palestine Action’s database of institutions and companies who profit from and enable Israel’s weapons trade.

    The local group said:

    By taking Elbit’s money, our council have Palestinian blood on their hands. By default, they’ve made the whole county of Somerset complicit in the ongoing genocide in Gaza. We refuse to stand by whilst the council continue to ignore our requests to evict Elbit. For the Palestinian people at the other end of Elbit’s weapons, we will continue to take action until the council kick Elbit out of Aztec West 600.

    Featured image and additional images via Palestine Action

    By Steve Topple

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • GB News has felt the full-ish force of Ofcom this week; well – as forceful as the unfit-for-purpose broadcasting regulator gets. However, it wasn’t the only one targeting the hate-mongering, lie-peddling, far-right TV station. Activists made their feelings about GB News very clear, too – right outside its front door.

    GB News: a torrent of lies and disinformation

    Days after the government released a new definition of extremism, Extinction Rebellion activists blockaded the offices of GB News and its multi-millionaire owner Paul Marshall – branding him and his pet broadcaster as ‘the real extremists’ – demanding an end to their torrent of climate crisis lies and disinformation.

    In a dramatic escalation of Extinction Rebellion’s Rebel For Truth campaign, on Monday 18 March protesters blocked the main doors of the headquarters of GB News with a metal tripod structure and two people locked themselves to its legs:

    GB News protest four

    Other protesters used fire extinguishers to spray windows with black liquid representing the oil and fossil fuel products setting the planet on fire while fellow activists with flares swathed the building in Paddington, London, in black smoke:

    A masked Extinction Rebellion climber wearing a Marshall Wace Hoodie dangled a Pinocchio puppet in a Union Jack waistcoat from on top of the tripod to symbolise the way that the station lies for it’s fossil fuel paymasters:

    Other activists unfurled banners reading: “GB News Cut The Ties to Fossil Fuel” and “Rebel for Truth”:

    A string of protesters encircled the entrance holding placards depicting the faces of GB News presenters including Nigel Farage, Jacob Rees Mogg, Richard Tice, and Lee Anderson, and station owner Marshall. Beneath each of them is written the word ‘Extremist’:

    GB News protest

    An extremist organisation

    Letters from Extinction Rebellion were emailed to GB News, MO6 (the Metropolitan Police unit specialising in public order planning), Michael Gove, the Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities, and Lord Walney, the ‘independent’ adviser on political violence and disruption who has created the government’s new extremism definition.

    They asked for an immediate investigation of GB News as an extremist organisation peddling an ideology of violence, hate, and intolerance with the intent of undermining our democracy, and for the broadcaster to be added to a new list of extremists.

    All the letters demanded an inquiry into whether owner Marshall is a fit and proper person to hold a broadcasting licence. His company also holds £2.2bn in fossil fuel investments.

    ‘Looking in the wrong places’

    Jon Fuller, one of the Extinction Rebellion team which targeted GB News, said:

    Our government is currently obsessed with identifying extremists, but they’re looking in the wrong places. The TV Lie Factory inside this building perfectly fits their new definition of extremism by peddling an ideology of violence, hate, and intolerance aimed at wrecking our liberal democracy.

    Fake claims by GB News presenters that the climate crisis is either not real or not serious reach millions of social media users, TV viewers and newspaper readers.

    By sowing climate doubt and confusion amongst our fellow citizens, GB News helps ensure our politicians feel no pressure at the ballot box to act urgently to stop a future of deadly famine, flood, heatwaves, storms, and war becoming a reality.

    They are putting billions of lives at ever-greater risk by delaying action to tackle the climate crisis. We are calling on the station to cease its extremist behaviour and for the police and government to take it off the air if it fails to do so.

    GB News: the very definition of extremism

    Todd Smith, another Extinction Rebellion activist, said:

    Paul Marshall is the very definition of an extremist. He has “liked” and retweeted dozens of racist, Islamophobic, and homophobic tweets, his pet TV station GB New spouts climate lies and anti-immigrant poison, he’s trying to buy extremist newspaper the Telegraph, and he bankrolled Brexit.

    One-in-three GB News presenters denied climate science on air, while more than half have attacked government and business actions to tackle the accelerating climate and ecological crisis.

    It’s clear that he’s trying to use his money and his media influence to stop urgent action on climate change and to divide the British people against each other through hate and intolerance. He must be stopped. We’re calling upon the government and the police to act against him immediately.

    The action at GB News is the latest escalation of Extinction Rebellion’s Rebel For Truth campaign that has seen activists under the banner Stop Selling Lies challenge the climate disinformation at the offices of the Daily Mail and the Telegraph every week for four months.

    Featured image and additional images via William Templeton/Extinction Rebellion

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Following a pattern of jury acquittals of environmental defenders and anti-genocide activists, which exposes the media fiction that the British government’s ‘crackdown on protest’ is in any way democratic, the Court of Appeal has today backed the Attorney General’s call to remove what was for many their last remaining line of legal defence.

    It has ruled that mass loss of life from climate breakdown and the government’s failure to act on the science are irrelevant to the circumstances of an action, for the purposes of the defence of consent to damage to property (Criminal Damage Act 1971, s.5(2)(a)). That is – protesters deeply-held and factual beliefs are no defence.

    Court of Appeal: siding with the climate-wrecking Tories

    The counter-intuitive decision bears an uncanny resemblance to the recent ruling of Judge Silas Reid that the climate crisis is ‘irrelevant’ to the defence of consent, which came after the Court of Appeal hearing but before the issue of its judgement, raising the question of whether he was tipped off by the Court of Appeal in relation to their intended ruling, which would be unlawful.

    Less than a month after the court hearing on 21 February, which saw members of the public stage a ‘peaceful makeover’ of the Royal Courts of Justice, the Lady Chief Justice ruled:

    Evidence from the defendant about the facts of effects of climate change would be inadmissible.

    The ruling follows a number of similar rulings by the British courts, which taken together operate to silence activists in court, preventing them from defending themselves and explaining their motivations to a jury.

    A history of removing legal defences

    The programmatic removal of legal defences from activists began in earnest in January 2021, when the High Court quashed the acquittal of an environmental defender, who had been cleared of criminal damage on the basis that her intention was to prevent damage to property, in particular in countries such as Bangladesh where countless people are already losing their homes to floods caused by human-made climate change.

    The High Court ruled she had no right to rely on the statutory defence in the Criminal Damage Act 1971 (s.5(2)(b)). It replaced the original not guilty verdict with a guilty verdict.

    Then in February 2021, the Court of Appeal in quashing the convictions of the Stansted 15 for a terrorist offence (the Stansted 15 had peacefully blocked a deportation flight, which exposed numerous people serious harm, and which was subsequently found to be unlawful) ruled that activists could not rely on the defence of necessity, i.e. action necessary to prevent serious harm, even if there was compelling evidence that their actions were necessary to prevent serious harm.

    Following the acquittal of the Colston 4 in January 2022, for toppling the statue of the slave-trader Edward Colston into Bristol Harbour, Suella Braverment referred the case to the Court of Appeal. The Court of Appeal ruled that the human rights based defences, advanced by the Colston 4, could not be presented to a jury in the future.

    In April 2023, Judge Shane Collery prevented Marcus Decker and Morgan Trowland from arguing to the jury that their action in dropping a Just Stop Oil banner from the Queen Elizabeth Bridge was a reasonable excuse in light of the mass loss of life from the climate crisis – even though ‘reasonable excuse’ is a statutory defence to public nuisance, the crime they were charged with, and which was introduced in the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Court Act s. 78 specifically for the context of activism.

    After leaving them with no defence, leading to their convictions, the Judge subsequently sent them to prison for two years seven months and three years respectively.

    Court of Appeal: following on from “alarming” crackdown

    In the absence of any defence, some judges, such as Judge Silas Reid at Inner London Crown Court, have taken to banning activists from explaining their motivations to the jury and banning them from using words such as ‘climate change’ and ‘fuel poverty’ in their courtroom. Judge Reid has sent 3 people to prison just for using those words in court.

    Such measures prompted an extraordinary intervention by the UN Special Rapporteur, Michel Forst, earlier this year:

    I was … alarmed to learn that, in some recent cases, presiding judges have forbidden environmental defenders from explaining to the jury their motivation for participating in a given protest or from mentioning climate change at all.

    It is very difficult to understand what could justify denying the jury the opportunity to hear the reason for the defendant’s action, and how a jury could reach a properly informed decision without hearing it, in particular at the time of environmental defenders’ peaceful but ever more urgent calls for the government to take pressing action for the climate.

    Judge Reid: a serial offender

    After witnessing attempts to silence activists in court, Trudi Warner, a 69 year-old retired social worker and legal observer, demonstrated outside Inner London Crown Court with a sign communicating the constitutional principle of jury equity, which dates back to 1670, i.e. that a jury can acquit a defendant as a matter of conscience, irrespective of the directions of the judge.

    Judge Reid had her arrested for this. On 18 April the Solicitor General will apply to the High Court to have her committed to prison.

    In a recent trial Judge Reid threatened a jury with criminal charges if they applied their conscience to the case. Speaking anonymously to Private Eye, a leading criminal KC said:

    I’ve never encountered a judge threatening jurors in the way that Judge Reid did. That suggests a clear determination by him to deter them from returning a verdict independently.

    These events have prompted critical headlines around the world from the US to Japan, Spain to India.

    Defend our juries – and our activists

    A spokesperson for campaign group Defend Our Juries said:

    It appears that Judge Reid was tipped off by the Court of Appeal that it would rule that the climate crisis was irrelevant to the circumstances of an action. It’s impossible to believe that two courts could simultaneously arrive at such a bizarre interpretation of the law independently.

    When will the legal profession and the judiciary wake up to what’s happening? It must be obvious to every serious observer that British law is being instrumentalised, on behalf of the fossil fuel industry, to silence and repress those taking action to confront the extreme danger from climate breakdown. If the urgent interventions from the UN and civil society organisations are not setting warning lights flashing, what will it take?

    With the established courts failing to discharge their basic function of protecting the British public from the abuse of power, it’s inevitable that others will step up.

    Featured image via the Royal Courts of Justice

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • In an unprecedented act of coordinated international climate protest, Extinction Rebellion activists from the UK, Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Germany, and the Netherlands protested in solidarity with each other against new North Sea fossil fuels extraction. Under the campaign North Sea Fossil Free acts of civil disobedience happened all around the North Sea.

    Governments promoting new fossil fuel extraction

    The governments of these six countries are permitting new fossil extraction infrastructure, harming not only the North Sea ecosystem, but also committing the whole world to dangerous levels of warming. None of the major North Sea fossil fuel-producing countries have plans to curtail drilling in alignment with the 1.5°C target. This was confirmed by a recent report.

    Despite international climate pledges, new sites for oil and gas extraction in the North Sea are still being continuously permitted.

    The IPCC, UNEP, and IEA are clear in their reports: expanding oil and gas production will take us far off course for our climate goals. If we continue to extract and burn fossil fuels at the current rate, our CO2 budget to stay below 1.5°C will run out in about five years.

    As our planet warms, so do our seas. This increases pressure on marine ecosystems, increasing the risk of extinctions. UNEP 2021 warned of the inconsistency between net zero targets and continued investments in new fossil infrastructure. UN secretary-general António Guterres has described investment in new fossil infrastructure at this point as “moral and economic madness”.

    Extinction Rebellion form a protest ring around the North Sea

    So, on Saturday 16 March, activists came together in a series of actions to demand all North Sea Oil countries align their drilling plans with the Paris Agreement now.

    Netherlands

    Extinction Rebellion and Scientists Rebellion blocked all main access roads to Shell’s Pernis refinery – the largest refinery in Europe:

    Shell plans to increase and expand production in the North Sea. It has been granted a permit for new gas drilling in the Victory Gas Field in and in April 2023 it resumed the Pierce Field production.

    At the same time, Shell is allowing the old drilling platforms and pipelines in the North Sea to rust away. These disintegrating oil and gas pipelines in the North Sea can poison the sea with mercury, radioactive lead and polonium.

    Germany

    Climate activists from Ende Gelände blocked access to the floating LNG terminal in the industrial port of Brunsbüttel:

    They demanded an immediate stop to imports of liquefied natural gas. According to the latest scientific studies, liquefied natural gas is more harmful to the climate than coal. A floating LNG terminal is currently in operation in Brunsbüttel, which is to be replaced by a fixed terminal in 2026/27.

    Norway

    Extinction Rebellion Norway shut down Rafnes Petroleum Refinery. Extinction Rebellion activists entered the security zone with a boat:

    Dozens of activists blocked the main entrance on land:

    Activists refused to move themselves.

    Denmark

    Activists from Fossil Free Future Denmark performed a protest concert with band Octopussy Riot. They entered TotalEnergies premises in Esbjerg harbour, occupying parts of it:

    Artist Linh Le said:

    We octopuses have formed the band Octopussy Riot and have arrived here to play our song, a demand for you two-legs to stop oil and gas extraction. The sea is dying, our climate collapsing. We will not accept that the most rich and powerful destroy our home. We do not want to go extinct.

    Sweden

    Extinction Rebellion Sweden blocked the road to the Oil Harbour in Gothenburg:

    North Sea Extinction Rebellion activists blocking a road

    The group has been taking action against the harbour since May 2022. Then, activists slow walked in the streets of downtown with banners:

    North Sea Extinction Rebellion activists walking with banner that reads 'north sea fossil free'

    Scotland

    Across Scotland, local groups supported the continental actions with banner drops in locations of strategic importance to the proposed development of new North Sea oil and gas.

    At a striking coastal location on the Moray Firth which could be devastated if there was an oil spill, Extinction Rebellion Forres organised performances from the black-clad “oil slicks” performance troupe:

    North Sea Extinction Rebellion activists on rocks with a banner that reads 'sea knows no borders'

    Shetland Stop Rosebank dropped banners at Lerwick Harbour – the main port supporting the first phase of the proposed Rosebank oil and gas field:

    In Aberdeen, the offices of Equinor and Ithaca (who own 80% and 20% of Rosebank respectively) were targeted with banners which read: “NORTH SEA FOSSIL FREE”, “STOP ROSEBANK” and “SEA KNOWS NO BORDERS”:

    Exploiting shared waters

    These countries are interconnected through the exploitation of their shared waters, while the effects of these harmful initiatives are affecting the climate far beyond this northern corner of the world.

    The North Sea countries are branding themselves as leading countries within the green transition, all the while allowing global companies like Equinor, Shell, and Total Energies to open new oil and gas fields.

    Projects like the Rosebank Oil field in the UK, deep seabed mining in Norway, and the re-opening of the Tyra II gas field in Denmark are accelerating the global climate and ecological crisis. A large part of all oil processed in the refineries in ​​​​Gothenburg harbour in Sweden is extracted from the North Sea.

    Extinction Rebellion said:

    Northern Europe’s oil and gas addiction is not only creating an ecological crisis in our own backyards, it is also fueling and profiting from the global climate crisis with no regard for people in the most affected areas. We acknowledge this devastating irony.

    Three Extinction Rebellion demands

    It is demanding:

    • NO NEW OIL AND GAS INFRASTRUCTURE IN THE NORTH SEA: Stop all plans to licence and financially support projects with new fossil infrastructure immediately. Align drilling plans with the Paris Agreement now.
    • TELL THE TRUTH: Governments and companies must be honest about climate change. We demand honesty regarding energy security and affordability, because North Sea oil and gas will not make energy more affordable​​​​​​. Governments must stop their jobwashing of new offshore projects. There are no jobs on a dead planet.
    • TAKE ACTION TOWARDS A JUST GREEN TRANSITION: Protect people and the environment by creating genuine and viable alternatives to fossil domination. This includes no LNG expansion, credible alternatives for workers, consideration for wildlife and letting people decide through citizens assemblies.

    The North Sea: governments promoting a “dirty lie”

    Jonas Kittelsen, spokesperson for Extinction Rebellion Norway, said:

    I’m ashamed to be a Norwegian. Norway profits massively from aggressively expanding our oil and gas sector, causing mass suffering and death globally. My government portrays us as better than the rest of the world, which we are not.

    Bram Kroezen, spokesperson for Extinction Rebellion Netherlands, said:

    The fossil industry and our governments want us to believe that gas from the North Sea is clean, but clean gas is a dirty lie.

    Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) is presented as an alternative to continued North Sea gas extraction. However, LNG is not a cleaner fuel that will help the energy transition, in most cases, LNG is more harmful for the environment than coal.

    In Germany, Ende Gelände are protesting the establishment of an LNG terminal being built along the North Sea coast. Experts have shown that the establishment of LNG infrastructure will lock us into fossil fuel use for the coming decades.

    Featured image and additional images via Extinction Rebellion

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Civil liberties network says in states where far-right parties influence power, rule-of-law deterioration risks becoming systemic

    The rule of law is declining across the EU as governments continue to weaken legal and democratic checks and balances, a leading civil liberties network has said, highlighting in particular a sharp rise in restrictions on the right to protest.

    Berlin-based Liberties said in its annual report, compiled with 37 rights groups in 19 countries, that in older democracies with mainstream parties in government, such as France, Germany and Belgium, challenges to the rule of law remained sporadic.

    Continue reading…

    This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.

  • Civil liberties network says in states where far-right parties influence power, rule-of-law deterioration risks becoming systemic

    The rule of law is declining across the EU as governments continue to weaken legal and democratic checks and balances, a leading civil liberties network has said, highlighting in particular a sharp rise in restrictions on the right to protest.

    Berlin-based Liberties said in its annual report, compiled with 37 rights groups in 19 countries, that in older democracies with mainstream parties in government, such as France, Germany and Belgium, challenges to the rule of law remained sporadic.

    Continue reading…

    This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.