Category: Protest

  • Israel is continuing its assault on the Gaza strip with an average of over 150 Palestinians being killed each day in the last week. So far, Israel has killed over 25,000 people in Gaza – including over 10,000 children. That’s why this weekend, Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC) and others are organising a day of action against Barclays on Saturday 27 January. The bank is one of the largest funders of Israeli war crimes.

    Barclays: funding Israel’s genocide in Gaza

    The Canary has documented Barclays many crimes against people and planet. From its support for fracking, to oil pipelines, via investing in union-busting companies, and the not-small matter of its former boss’s ties to child trafficker Jeffrey Epstein – Barclays is one of the most notorious corporations on the planet.

    According to a recent report by War on Want, the bank holds £1,300,688,880 in shares of companies whose weapons, components, and military technology have been used in unlawful violence against Palestinians. This includes investments in BAE Systems, Boeing and Elbit Systems,

    Moreover, it provides over £3bn in loans and underwriting to nine companies whose weapons, components, and military technology have been used in Israel’s armed violence against Palestinians.

    Arms companies have seen their factories blockaded in recent months, in response to a call made by Palestinian trade unions:

    The bank also has investments in Caterpillar, whose D9 bulldozers are used to demolish Palestinian homes, schools, and civilian infrastructure to allow settlements to be built in the occupied West Bank, deemed illegal under international law.

    Take action for Palestine

    However, direct action can make a difference. Already several institutions, including pension funds and sovereign wealth funds, have cut their ties to companies profiting from violations of Palestinian human rights. Now, PSC and friends like the Peace and Justice Project want to force Barclays to do the same.

    Groups across the country have been taking action against Barclays including occupying their branches and boycotting their services. Now, this will be coordinated on 27 January nationwide:

    Then, on 9 February hundreds of people will close their Barclays bank account in support of a free Palestine. You can do that here.

    Plus, on Sunday 28 January, Stop the War Coalition is hosting an anti-war convention in East London. This will be an opportunity for people to come together and discuss the collective response to the ever-widening conflict in the Middle East. Join Jeremy Corbyn, National Education Union (NEU) general secretary Daniel Kebede, Palestinian author Ghada Karmi, and more at this ‘Stop Bombing Gaza! Stop Bombing Yemen’.

    The Peace and Justice Project said:

    If our government and businesses won’t end their complicity with Israeli war crimes then we must force them to.

    We hope you can join your local action this weekend and the next National Demonstration on Saturday 3rd February in London.

    Featured image via Extinction Rebellion

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • By Don Wiseman, RNZ Pacific senior journalist

    Academic Andrew Anton Mako says the Papua New Guinea’s systemic dysfunction was plain to see in the rioting and looting throughout the country’s main cities two weeks ago.

    That rioting was sparked by a protest by police after unannounced deductions from their wages.

    It led to a riot causing the deaths of more than 20 people, widespread looting and hundreds of millions of dollars damage to businesses.

    Andrew Anton Mako of ANU
    Andrew Anton Mako of ANU . . . “the government and the policymakers really need to take a comprehensive approach.” Image: DevPolicy Blog

    The government, which declared a two-week long state of emergency, put the wage deductions down to a glitch in the system.

    Mako, who is a visiting lecturer and project coordinator for the ANU-UPNG Partnership with the Australian National University’s Development Policy Centre, said that the rioting would not have happened if the system was working properly.

    “That information could have been transmitted through the system so that not only the police officers, but other public servants would have been assured that there was a glitch in the system, and then they would return the money in the next pay,” he said.

    Symptom of major problems
    “I think that information could have been made available to the officers quickly and the protests should not have happened.”

    He said it was not an isolated event but a symptom of major problems facing the country.

    “The government and the policymakers really need to take a comprehensive approach in addressing that,” Mako said.

    He said that in the administration there were entire areas where little development or reform had happened in a generation.

    The last attempt to look at the government machinery was more than 20 years, under Sir Mekere Morauta, but since then “there hasn’t been any sort of reforms to improve governance, improve public safety, efficiency, and all that.”

    Mako believes if the work of Sir Mekere had been continued the country would not be facing the problems it is at the moment.

    What reforms are needed
    Mako said the government needs to know it faces major issues that cannot be resolved quickly — they will need to think in terms of years before reforms can be bedded in.

    “It’s not going to be easy, they have to really work on it for a number of years. They will have to come up with a reform agenda work on it for the next four or five years.”

    Up to now, Mako said, politicians have just dealt with the symptoms, rather than addressing the underlying issues, such as unemployment.

    He sees the high crime rate as being closely linked to the lack of work opportunities, along with high inflation and the failure of wages to keep pace.

    “The focus has to be on the sectors that create jobs. So over the last few years, over the last decade or so, a lot of focus has really been on the resources sector, the mineral, petroleum and gas sector.

    “Those sectors are really called enclave sectors and they have really limited linkage with the broader sectors of the economy,” Mako said.

    “So the mineral sectors do not create a lot of jobs. A lot of the jobs [there] are done by either machines or highly skilled workers. So it is the sectors like agriculture, like fisheries, like tourism, forestry, those are the sectors really, really create jobs.”

    Mako added the government should be focussing on investing in, and developing policies, in these traditional sectors, enabling many of the unemployed, especially the young, to find work.

    This article is republished under a community partnership agreement with RNZ.


    This content originally appeared on Asia Pacific Report and was authored by APR editor.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • On Monday 22 January Palestine Action covered Twickenham Stadium in blood red paint, hours before the Defence IQ’s ‘International Armoured Vehicles’ expo was due to commence:

    Twickenham Stadium: complicit in Israel’s genocide on Gaza

    The event, which is marketed as “the world’s premier international meeting ground for all elements of the armoured community”, hosts representatives of Israel’s weapons trade, including largest weapons company, Elbit Systems Ltd, along with representatives of their British subsidiary Elbit Systems UK and the Israeli state-owned arms manufacturer, Rafael.

    Based in Haifa, Elbit is responsible for the manufacture of vast amounts of the Israel‘s military technologies – including 85% of its drones and land-based military equipment, all of its small-calibre ammunition, and an array of munitions, surveillance and targeting technologies, and other armaments.

    During the current onslaught on Gaza, which has thus far martyred over 25,000 Palestinians, Elbit Systems’ CEO described the company as playing a crucial role in the genocide, which received gratitude for this by the Israeli military. From this country, Elbit export numerous drone technologies, surveillance and targeting systems, and other weaponry to the Zionist regime, from manufacturing sites in Shenstone, Tamworth, Kent, Bristol, and Leicester.

    Palestine Action has, for over three years, worked to prevent manufacture at these premises and to disrupt Elbit’s appearances and marketing wherever possible – including at high-security weapons fairs such as this.

    A blood-red reminder

    One such example is Defence and Security Equipment International (DSEI). Taking place every two years – supported by the UK government, and organised by Clarion Events – DSEI is a massive event for arms dealers. One of its primary functions is to allow arms companies to network with representatives from some of the world’s most repressive regimes.

    Companies will encourage delegates from human-rights-abusing nations such as BahrainQatarTurkey, and Saudi Arabia to buy the latest weapons to suppress their own populations and/or to wage war against others. Moreover, Campaign Against Arms Trade (CAAT) research shows that over 40 Israeli arms companies – including Elbit Systems – had stalls at DSEI in 2023 – weeks before Israel began its genocide in Gaza.

    Twickenham has, therefore, was covered in a blood-red reminder of the Palestinian bloodshed for which their guests of honour are responsible:

    Action Twickenham Stadium 22/01/24Other companies present include Thales, Elbit’s partner in running their UAV-Tactical-Systems joint enterprise drone plant in Leicester, along with other firms facilitating Israel’s genocide including Leonardo, BAE Systems, and Teledyne.

    A Palestine Action spokesperson said of the expo at Twickenham Stadium:

    That Israeli arms dealers are invited as guests of honour at a time when their deadly output is on full show in the Gaza genocide should shame all people who enter this abominable event. After developing their weaponry in the Laboratory of Palestine, Elbit and Rafael then sell these technologies on to other regimes.

    While our governments happily turn a blind eye to this brutality, Palestine Action will continue to work to make sure that Israeli war criminals have nowhere to hide.

    Featured image and additional images via Palestine Action

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • On Monday 22 January, campaign groups Fossil Free London, Just Stop Oil, Extinction Rebellion, Scientists for Extinction Rebellion, and their supporters staged a demonstration to resist the Offshore Petroleum Licensing Bill, which is having its second reading at the House of Commons:

    The Offshore Petroleum Licensing Bill: a disaster

    Members of the groups came together at Parliament Square with banners and placards to voice their outrage against the Bill, moving to the gates of Parliament where MPs enter to vote.

    If passed, the Offshore Petroleum Licensing Bill will allow fossil fuel corporations to bid for new North Sea licences every year. The bill comes after the government and North Sea Transition Authorities already announced their plan to give out more than 100 production licences for new oil and gas in the North Sea.

    Whilst the Conservative government justifies continued extraction of new North Sea oil and gas, claiming it’s cleaner than importing gas from outside the UK and will improve the country’s energy security, experts have refuted both claims.

    The government has now also publicly admitted that any gas and oil extracted from the North Sea wouldn’t actually go to UK consumers; it would be sold in the international market.

    Utter madness from the government

    The government’s expansion plans for North Sea oil and gas comes as 2023 was marked as the hottest year ever recorded on Earth, smashing scientists predictions. Further too, the International Energy Agency stated back in 2021 that there can be new oil, gas or coal development if the world is to reach net zero by 2050; a target the UK government is legally bound to.

    Energy secretary Clare Coutinho has admitted new North Sea oil and gas won’t bring down household energy bills. In fact, analysis by Uplift has shown that the development of the Rosebank oil field alone will cost the public £3.75bn in tax relief.

    Joanna Warrington, spokesperson for Fossil Free London, said:

    The UK Government’s Offshore Petroleum Licencing Bill is nothing short of deadly. Pressing ahead with fossil fuel expansion plans in the midst of climate breakdown just makes us less energy secure and fuels the UK’s freak floods as more of our coastal homes drop into the sea. The government is making the interests they serve plain – it’s oily millionaires burning our house down for profit.

    Exposing the government’s “true priorities”

    Pete Knapp of Scientists for Extinction Rebellion said:

    New oil and gas will do nothing to bring down our energy bills, or help with our energy security as most of the oil will be sold on the world market. New oil and gas is also incompatible with keeping within 1.5C. The government is either scientifically illiterate, is playing political games with our futures, or just doesn’t care, but, most likely – all three.

    After everyone agreed to transition away from fossil fuels at COP28 in December, what message is this sending to the rest of the world?

    Kush Naker, a Just Stop Oil supporter and NHS GP said the Offshore Petroleum Licensing Bill:

    shows us what the governments true priorities are, they are happy to sacrifice the lives of the British public just to maximise the oil company profits.

    This government is addicted to oil, even though it is killing us. It’s like we have got cancer, but the government is still forcing us to smoke more cigarettes.

    Many Tory MPs know they’ll be kicked out at the next election, so they’ve become even more unhinged. They’re using these last few months to rush through more bills to please their oily billionaire chums in a desperate hope they’ll be offered jobs once they lose their seats. It’s pure greed.

    Feature image and additional images via Zoe Broughton

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Over 100 pro-Palestine demonstrators took to the streets of Haverfordwest on Saturday 20 January where they staged a ‘mock Funeral’ on Castle Square representing 24,448 dead Palestinians who have been killed by Israel in Gaza in the last 100+ days. The protestors then marched on Conservative MP Stephen Crabb’s Office where the dead bodies were once again laid on the street and outside his office door.

    Protesters inadvertently found a champagne bottle in the office’s recycling – highlighting the hypocrisy of the situation:

    Still marching for Palestine

    Since October 7th, Israel has killed over 25,000 Palestinians in Gaza; over 10,400 of these were children and over 7,100 women, while a further 62,681 have been injured. Israel has killed around 337 health workers, 117 journalists, and 152 UN staff – while 1.9 million Palestinians are now displaced with desperately limited access to food, medicines, and water.

    Protester Ayesha Hussain stated:

    It’s awful that we’ve had to come out again today because our MP Stephen Crabb has STILL refused to call for a ceasefire and stop the killing of innocent men, women and children in Gaza. It’s disgraceful that this is still allowed to happen. We won’t be going away. We will remain steadfast until Palestine is free and until Stephen Crabb grows a backbone and calls for a ceasefire.

    Palestine demoOne of the organisers Jim Scott of Stop the War Pembrokeshire said:

    What kind of world are we living in where we have to make mock up dead bodies like this for a demonstration?

    It is just beyond unfathomable what the people of Gaza are going through right now. Stephen Crabb & Simon Hart MPs have blood on their hands. Crabb isn’t just complicit in the killings in Gaza, he called for this in parliament in October before it even happened.

    He’s the chair of the Conservative Friends of Israel and is part of their propaganda machine dehumanising innocent babies, children, women and men. This is genocide, nothing less and Crabb will be judged by history for this.

    Crabb: support the ICJ ruling

    The Campaign group Solidarity with Palestine Pembrokeshire has also begun delivering weekly open letters to Crabb. This week’s letter focused on the genocide case in the Hague against Israel’s war crimes – asking Crabb: “will you support the ICJ ruling”, if the international court decides that Israel is committing a Genocide in Gaza.

    Campaigners announced that next week’s open letter to Crabb will be an invitation to meet with them and to discuss and justify his current position on the killings taking place in Palestine. Still, protesters lined up the shrouded mock bodies outside his office door:

    mock dead bodies outside Crabb's officeCampaigner Farhana Akhtar said:

    We have had to wrap white clothes around items to create make-believe shrouds to raise awareness and make a powerful statement. Sadly, it is not make-belief in Gaza. The only items coming to Gaza in surplus are shrouds and it’s abhorrent that most of these shrouds are tiny in size as Israel continues its onslaught against children. We will not stop. We will be the voice for the voiceless and we will not be deterred.

    Key National Trade Unionists gave speeches at the rally, including Cerith Griffiths of the Fire Brigades Union Cymru and Mairéad Canavan a National Executive member of the National Education Union.

    Canavan said:

    I am supporting the demonstration because this is a human catastrophe caused by the deliberate action of the Government of Israel and is clearly a war crime and an act of genocide. The UK government has failed to call for a permanent ceasefire and continues to give unconditional support to Israel. As a teacher I’m particularly horrified by the cost of the genocide to children.

    Targeting those complicit with Israel

    Since October 7, local demonstrations have repeatedly marched on Stephen Crabb’s constituency office as well as targeting Marks & Spencer and Barclays bank over their support for Israel’s war and occupation in Palestine, weekly vigils have also been held:

    Mariam Akhtar who attended the protest said:

    Children like me don’t have a chance in Gaza. So many have been killed by Israel but I will be their voice. I will protest and call for this violence to end. Me and many others again ask our MP to be kind and to be a human and stand up for humanity. We ask him to please please call a ceasefire and stand with innocent children.

    It’s so sad to me that brown lives don’t seem to matter but when a white country like the Ukraine is occupied, everyone including us brown people stand against the oppressors and occupiers and we stand with humanity but our leaders are so evil that they won’t even call for the killing to stop.

    Stop Israel’s genocide

    With South Africa’s allegations of Genocide against Israel currently being heard by the ICJ in the Hague, organisers said “It is clear that Israel wants to ethnically cleanse Gaza of Palestinians”, adding that:

    Biden, Netanyahu, Sunak, Starmer, and our own MP’s Crabb and Hart, are complicit in this war crime. We are rallying to send a clear message from Pembrokeshire to Crabb & Hart that this genocide must stop. We are rising up for Palestine and we are certainly not going away as Crabb has been claiming.

    Saturday’s demonstration took place as part of coordinated local rallies around the UK following hundreds of such demonstrations since Israel’s war on Gaza began. National demonstrations have attracted hundreds of thousands of people on the streets of London – and organisers encourage everyone to join local and national rallies in support of Palestine and to demand an end to Israel’s genocide on Gaza.

    Featured image and additional images via Stop The War Pembrokeshire

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • On 20 January, shadow foreign secretary David Lammy gave a speech at the Fabian Society conference. Lammy’s speech was interrupted by pro-Palestinian protesters who asked him:

    will you condemn the genocide?

    and:

    how many more children need to die?

    The Fabian Society had a predictably grim response to it all:

    Lammy and the Fabian Society: all about power

    If you’re unsure what the Labour Party-affiliated Fabian Society is, they are to Blairite neoliberal politics what dog shit is to bad smells. When they say ‘power not protest’, what they mean is they’d rather be the ones privatising the NHS than the ones lacking healthcare under it; they’d rather be the ones starting the Iraq war than the ones dying in it; and they’d rather be the ones giving Fujitsu a contract for software that doesn’t work than the subpostmasters going to prison over it.

    ‘Power’ is an empty word in that they want it purely for its own sake; not because they’d do anything moral or useful with it. And people were quick to point this out:

    And talking about wielding power:

    Political commentator Barnaby Raine linked the tweet to the Fabian’s history of grim commentary:

    Shadow party

    It wasn’t for nothing that protesters targeted Lammy, as the shadow foreign secretary is also being roundly criticised. Diane Abbott was another person pointing out how useless power is in the hands of these Labour politicians:

    In this interview Lammy said “it’s about change through power, not protest”:

    It’s increasingly unclear what this slogan they’re so happy with even means. Will those who protested Lammy be allowed to share the power if Labour becomes the next government? If not, then how will they exert change if they don’t agree with Labour, if not through protest?

    Change?

    Labour keeps telling us that change can only happen when they’re in power; they also keep telling us they won’t offer any change to the Tories:

    People are protesting Labour not because they think Labour has the power to act now; they’re protesting Labour because they’re worried what Labour will do when it’s in government. They’re drawing a line in the sand and they’re saying we don’t condone this under the Tories, and we won’t condone it under you.

    Public dissatisfaction being what it is, Labour has an open shot at the goal in the next election. Despite this, they’re doing their upmost to kick the ball directly at the stands.

    Featured image via Sky News

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • On Wednesday 17 January, four Devon and Cornwall police officers raided the house of a pensioner over allegations of criminal damage to Falmouth and Truro Tory MP Cherilyn Mackrory’s office. The alleged crime was committed using… wait for it… drawing pins.

    April: a criminal mastermind with drawing pins

    The pensioner, April, woke up to find police officers in her house. They arrested her on suspicion of criminal damage while still in her nightie.

    The police alleged that she damaged the office door by attaching posters with drawing pins. Yes, you read that correctly. Cops raided April because she pinned some posters to a door.

    After searching the house, the police de-arrested her on the condition that she voluntarily attends a police interview. A video of the raid, and the impact it had on April, can be seen here:

    Mackrory has refused to engage with constituents, including April. This is despite their repeated requests regarding concerns over her own government’s position on the genocide the Israeli government is perpetrating against Palestinian people, and this government’s complicity in war crimes committed by the Israeli state.

    Speaking about the raid, April said:

    I am angry – angry that war criminals, mass murderers, torturers, arms traders, the inflictors and enablers of genocide and brutality go free to continue the brutal mayhem they inflict on others across the globe but our government chooses to hound, harass, arrest those who seek to lay bare their crimes.

    Devon and Cornwall police say… not a lot…

    The Canary asked Devon and Cornwall police for comment. Specifically, we wanted to know if it thought that the cops’ actions were an overreach of their powers. HINT: they probably were.

    A spokesperson told the Canary:

    We are investigating two separate reports of criminal damage to properties in the Truro area and enquiries are ongoing. Due to this being a live and active investigation, it would not be appropriate to comment further at this time.

    Reflective of the UK in 2023

    A spokesperson for campaign group Palestine Solidarity Cornwall said:

    This was an act of intimidation by Devon and Cornwall police against a Grandmother who has simply tried to hold her elected representative to account for the atrocities she, and her government, are supporting in Gaza.

    While it is reflective of the police harassment Palestine solidarity campaigners have faced across the country for speaking out against a genocide, it is outrageous they have decided to put a pensioner through this ordeal over some drawing pins.

    However, we will not be intimidated by these actions. The UN has described Gaza as a “graveyard for children”, and while our so-called elected representatives continue to support the massacre of children, and refuse to stop the export of UK weapons to facilitate this slaughter, we will continue taking action.

    Moreover, Devon and Cornwall police’s actions are reflective of the increasingly authoritarian UK state under successive Tory governments.

    As the Canary has documented, the state increasingly criminalising protest is becoming a lot more common and authoritarian, with the Tories’ Police, Crime, Sentencing, and Courts (PCSC) Act. However, all this pales in comparison to the horror the Israeli state inflicts on Palestinian people, day in, day out.

    So, regardless of the consequences, activists in the UK will continue to show their solidarity with those living under apartheid – even if, like April, it means preposterous cops raid your home while you’re still in your nightie – all over some drawing pins.

    Featured image via Sarah Wilkinson – screengrab

    By Steve Topple

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • After over 100 days of Israel’s bombardment in Gaza, killing over 24,000 Palestinians, hundreds will take to the roads for solidarity cycles across the world this Saturday, 20 January – and again in February. Called the Great Ride of Return, events are taking place in numerous locations.

    Gaza Sunbirds

    The Great Ride is a series of upcoming cycles which follow the success of 60+ organised rides worldwide earlier this month. Inspired by Palestinian para cycling team, Gaza Sunbirds, these will be supported by a number of partnered organisations including the Big Ride for Palestine, AMOS Trust, and Native Women Ride.

    The Gaza Sunbirds were founded after champion cyclist Alaa al-Dali was shot in the leg by an Israeli sniper during the 2018 Great March of Return, in which thousands of Palestinians protested to demand an end to the illegal Israeli siege of Gaza.

    His injuries led to amputation of his leg, and after the founding of the team, Gaza Sunbirds now includes around 20 Palestinian para-athletes who suffered similar life-altering injuries. Prior to the ongoing Israeli offensive against Gaza, the Sunbirds were training in the hope of landing a wildcard place at the Paris 2024 Paralympics.

    Karim Ali, co-founder of the Gaza Sunbirds, said:

    We’re getting on our bikes now to keep carrying our voice forward. The Sunbirds will never be able to compete if we don’t survive this genocide.

    Since Israel’s attacks, the Sunbirds have had to turn their attention to surviving the bombing and intensified siege of Gaza, while helping to distribute food and other mutual aid locally, and rallying a global community of cycling followers now in the tens of thousands to ride for freedom during these organised cycles.

    The Great Ride of Return for Palestine

    In the UK, The Great Ride of Return is led by the Big Ride for Palestine, which has been organising Palestinian solidarity rides nationwide since 2015. Big Ride for Palestine is also one of over 60 sign ups to Gaza Sunbirds’ Athletes for Palestine – a campaign aiming to unite the world through sport.

    The 6 January ride saw 61 group rides globally – from El Salvador to Tokyo, Kuala Lumpur, London, Manchester, Singapore, Cape Town, Los Angeles, and many more cities besides.

    This powerful international moment was collaboratively inspired, supported, and regulated by the Sunbirds and US-based Indigenous cycling collective, Native Women Ride. The latter is another new sign up to the Athletes for Palestine campaign.

    Now, organisers are anticipating an even larger turnout, with more riders in more cities for upcoming cycles in the series.

    Team captain Alaa al-Dali asked cyclists worldwide to:

    Join us on our journey to send a powerful message to the world to stop the siege of Gaza. We ride for freedom.

    You can join or organise a Great Ride of Return solidarity cycle in your city on 20 January or Saturday 10 February. More information is available here.

    Ride locations

    20 January Great Ride of Return global locations:

    • Sheffield with Big Ride for Palestine (UK): 9:30am at Ellemere Green.
    • Bristol with Big Ride for Palestine (UK): 10am at Clifton Downs Water Tower.
    • Birmingham with Big Ride for Palestine (UK): 10:30am at MAC, Cannon Hill Park.
    • Hastings with Big Ride for Palestine (UK): 11am at General Dynamics.
    • London with Big Ride for Palestine (UK): 11:30am at the National Theatre, Southbank.
    • Brussels (Belgium): 12:30pm at Tronte metro station.
    • Burgos (Spain): 9:44am ay TBC.
    • Chicago (Illinois, US): 5:00pm at 325 East Illinois Street.
    • Asheville (North Carolina, US): 6:00pm @ Pack Square Amphitheatre.
    • Tuscan (Arizona, US): 10pm at BICAS 2001 7th Avenue.
    • Toronto (Canada): 5am at Grange Park.

    Featured image via Big Ride for Palestine

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Pro-Palestine demonstration will stage a ‘mock funeral’ in Haverfordwest, Wales this Saturday 20 January at 2pm on Castle Square. Protestors said that Stephen Crabb MP is “feeling the heat”, as local pressure mounts for him to withdraw his support for Israel’s genocidal war on Gaza.

    Organisers invite attendees to bring white shrouded mock dead bodies, spattered in red paint for a symbolic mass funeral representing the 24,448 Palestinians who Israel has killed in over 100 days of war on Gaza.

    Standing up for Palestine in Wales

    Since 7 October, local demonstrations have repeatedly marched on Crabb’s constituency office as well as targeting Marks & Spencer and Barclays bank over their support for Israel’s war and occupation in Palestine, weekly vigils have also been held.

    With South Africa’s allegations of genocide against Israel currently being heard by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in the Hague, organisers said:

    It is clear that Israel wants to ethnically cleanse Gaza of Palestinians.

    They say that Joe Biden, Benjamin Netanyahu, Rishi Sunak, Keir Starmer, and their own MPs Crabb and Simon Hart are complicit in this war crime. they say they are rallying to send a clear message from Pembrokeshire to Crabb and Hart that this genocide must stop:

    We are rising up for Palestine and we are certainly not going away as Crabb has been claiming.

    You can join them on 20 January in Castle Square, Haverfordwest at 2pm to make a stand for Palestine.

    Countless Palestinians dead, injured, and traumatised

    Since October 7th, 24,448 Palestinians have been killed in Gaza,10,400 of these were children and 7,100 women, a further 61,504 have been injured with 7,000 missing, 337 health workers, 117 journalists, and 152 UN staff have been killed while 1.9 million Palestinians are now displaced with desperately-limited access to food, medicines, and water.

    Local campaigners have begun delivering weekly open letters to Crabb. This week’s letter focused on the Genocide case in the Hague against Israel’s war crimes, asking him: “Will you support the ICJ ruling?”, if the international court decides that Israel is committing a Genocide in Gaza.

    Key national trade unionists are to attend and speak at the rally – including Cerith Griffiths of the Fire Brigades Union Cymru and Mairéad Canavan, a National Executive member of the NEU (National Education Union).

    Canavan said:

    I am supporting the demonstration because this is a human catastrophe caused by the deliberate action of the Government of Israel and is clearly a war crime and an act of genocide.

    The UK government has failed to call for a permanent ceasefire and continues to give unconditional support to Israel. As a teacher I’m particularly horrified by the cost of the genocide to children. Since 7 October 2023 , at least 24,000 Palestinians were killed in Gaza and 59,604 Palestinians were reportedly injured. Some 70 per cent of the fatalities are women and children.

    Nizar Dahan (Neezo), who is a prominent pro-Palestine activist from Swansea, said:

    After 103 days plus 75 years of Israeli aggression and occupation, it is important, now more than ever, to keep speaking out for Palestine. The narrative is changing, and people are waking up to the brutality of the terrorist state of Israel. The ongoing genocide and statements to support it are a clear indication of the Zionist entities’ intentions. Our movement is working and helping to educate people on the dire need to support Palestine. This is a cause for all of humanity

    Politicians will be ‘judged by history’

    The demonstration will take place as part of coordinated local rallies around Wales and the UK this weekend following hundreds of such demonstrations since Israel’s war on Gaza began. National demonstrations have also attracted hundreds of thousands of people in London in recent weeks.

    Organisers Stop The War Pembrokeshire and Solidarity with Palestine Pembrokeshire said:

    Who would ever think that as campaigners we would have to resort to staging a protest which includes a mock funeral & laying shrouded dead bodies? It seems unfathomable and so desperately sad that we are forced to organise such a macabre protest.

    However, we have no choice and we are acting on the wishes of our Palestinian sisters, brothers and comrades who are dying at this very moment at the hands of Israel’s murderous Genocide”. Stephen Crabb and Simon Hart are very much mistaken if they think we will “go away”, In fact the opposite is true, as international pressure mounts against Israel’s war crimes.

    Crabb and Hart will be judged by history over their current support for Israel’s Genocide in Gaza.

    All details of Saturday’s demonstration can be found at the Facebook event page here.

    Featured image via the Canary

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • In recent days Palestine Action has targeted the logistics companies servicing the operations of Israel’s arms trade in Britain, as well as the biggest arms manufacturer – disrupting both their operations and exposing their roles in supporting the ongoing genocide of Palestinians.

    Palestine Action: targeting Israeli arms’ supply chain

    First, Palestine Action targeted logistics companies belonging to Kuehne+Nagel (K+N) and Palletline on 17 January, as part of a widespread direct action campaign against Israel’s biggest weapons manufacturer, Elbit Systems, and the companies which facilitate their weapons manufacturing in Britain and their arms exports to Israel.

    K+N’s Milton Keynes branch and their subsidiary in London, Nacaro cargo insurance, were targeted overnight. At the company’s Milton Keynes industrial site, which specialises in road transportation, activists sprayed the entire front of the building in blood-red paint and shattered windows.

    In London, others took similar action against Nacora, leaving the office drenched in paint:

    In Scotland, activists from Palestine Action struck Palletline’s Glasgow site, breaking their windows and spray painting messages such as “Drop Elbit” and “Free Palestine”. Palletline frequently transport items in and out of Elbit’s drone factory, U-TacS, In Leicester:

    K+N provide transportation and logistics services for Elbit’s UAV Tactical Systems (U-TacS) factory in Leicester, facilitating the manufacture and delivery of Israeli drone technologies. Along with partnerships held with Elbit – the company supplying 85% of Israel’s drones and land based military equipment – K+N played a historical role in trafficking weapons to apartheid South Africa, bolstering the regime in the 1980s. According to the Anti-Apartheid Movement, these shipments were even sent to South Africa via Israel.

    Then, Palestine Action targeted Elbit itself.

    Elbit: still under pressure

    The group was supported by the Bristol-based ‘Rise Up for Palestine’. They shut down the Israeli-owned Elbit weapons headquarters in Bristol on the morning of Thursday 18 January. Dozens from the local group surrounded four activists from Palestine Action who locked on to each other – making the blockade of the only entrance to Elbit’s HQ immovable:

    Elbit Systems UK operates across England and Wales and is owned by Israel’s largest weapons company. The Bristol location, which is leased from Somerset Council, is Elbit’s main operational facility.

    This action happened while Israel is mounting a campaign of genocide and ethnic cleansing, bombarding Gaza and killing over 25,000 Palestinians, injuring over 60,000 people and displacing over 1.9 million captive Palestinians.

    In the past few days, Al-Aqsa hospital in Gaza, one of only 13 out of 35 remaining functioning hospitals, has come under attack by the Israeli army. Drones and quadcopters, most likely developed by Elbit, are being used to fire at anyone who enters or leaves the hospital.

    The Israeli weapons firm openly talk of having “battle tested” its weapons, through Israel’s deployment of them against Palestinians, before these are then sold on the global market. In the current bombardment, Elbit’s new iron sting missiles and drone technologies are being used to massacre the Palestinian people.

    ‘End the complicity in genocide’

    A Palestine Action spokesperson has said:

    Disrupting Israel’s military supply chain through direct action and community mobilisation is a crucial and necessary tactic to deploy as our Palestinian siblings are under fire by Elbit’s weaponry. We do not stand for genocide enablers on our doorstep, and we’ve once again made it clear that Elbit is not welcome in Bristol or anywhere on British soil.

    We will continue to rise up and take the power back into our own hands to shut down the companies arming Israel’s genocide of Palestine.

    Moreover, companies assisting in the delivery and shipment of Israeli weaponry and essential equipment for Elbit, facilitate and profit from the genocide of the Palestinian people. Thus, Palestine Action remain determined to target all those who remain associated with Elbit

    In the past 100 days over 25,000 Palestinians were killed, and for the last 75 years they’ve remained under an apartheid regime enabled by the British government. Whilst our pleas for sanctions on apartheid Israel fall on deaf ears, it’s up to ordinary people to take direct action and end the complicity in genocide.

    Featured image via Palestine Action

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • As day broke over the small mountain town of Elliston, Virginia one Monday in October, masked figures in thick coats emerged from the woods surrounding a construction site. Three of them approached three excavators and, one by one, locked themselves to the machines, bringing the day’s work to a halt. As they did so, several dozen of their fellow protesters gathered around them, unfurling banners and chanting amidst the groaning and beeping of construction equipment. 

    They made their way across the field, over patches of bare earth, around sections of rusty pipe meant for burial beneath the mountain. Eventually the metal tubes  will form yet another section of the Mountain Valley Pipeline, which will soon carry 2 billion cubic feet of fracked methane from the shalefields of West Virginia to North Carolina each day. Their breath billowed in the crisp air. Beyond them stretched a bright blue sky, and mountains tinged with yellow. The past night’s rain pooled on the muddy and compacted soil beneath their feet.

    Workers in highlighter-yellow vests and hard hats milled around, some looking amused, others frustrated. One or two engaged with the protesters, only to be told off by an irate site manager. A few miles away at the West Virginia state line, another three dozen or so activists did much the same atop Peters Mountain. One even managed to crawl under an excavator and lock herself in place, despite the cold. The others rallied around, enclosing her in a tight, protective circle.

    Some might wonder why they bothered. After all, the project is, by the Mountain Valley Pipeline company’s estimate, 94 percent complete and will be wrapped up before summer. It  stalled for several years amid legal fights over various permits, but Senator Joe Manchin, a moderate Democrat from West VIrginia, almost single-handedly revived it in 2022 in exchange for his support of key Democratic priorities. Since then, the Biden administration and the Supreme Court have all but assured its completion. With the approximately 303-mile pipeline approaching the final stretch after almost a decade’s work, it might seem hardly worth fighting at this point.

    A large contingent of steadfast opposition begs to differ, and will enthusiastically explain why. The pipeline is six years behind schedule, about half a billion dollars over budget, and, despite promises that it would be done by the end of last year, delayed once again. The remaining construction is over rugged terrain, with hundreds of water crossings left to bridge. The company recently postponed, shortened, and rerouted its planned extension into North Carolina, a proposal long stymied by permitting problems with the main line. And, just last month, Equitrans, which owns the pipeline and many others across the country, was said to be considering selling itself. The road to the pipeline’s completion remains rocky, its opponents argue, with many opportunities to make finishing it as difficult as possible.

    “We cannot let them destroy our land and water,” said a young woman named Ericka. Like many interviewed for this story, she gave only her first name out of fear of reprisal from Mountain Valley Pipeline LLC, which has begun suing protesters in a bid to silence them. She had brought her three children to occupy the land that day. “What are we going to drink? Where are we going to live? People have to come here and stop this.”

    A protestor is chained to a piece of heavy construction equipment beneath a banner reading "Land Back."
    A protestor locked herself to an excavator, bringing work on the Mountain Valley Pipeline to a halt. Photo courtesy Appalachians Against Pipelines

    Killing the project is their ideal outcome. Barring that, those who have for almost a decade packed public hearings, spent weeks at sit-ins and even lived high in trees for 932 days want to make building pipelines so time consuming, so expensive, so plain annoying, that fossil fuel companies and the politicians who support them think twice about greenlighting any more.

    Even as pipeline crews continue steadily boring under rivers and felling trees, activists say each day they can delay construction is another day humanity delays the worst impacts of climate change. The increasingly grave personal and legal risks they face are, they say, worth it, if only for that.

    “For  five f****** years, we’ve fought you without fear,” sang the masked figures on Peters Mountain, and “we’ll fight you for five f****** more.”

    Morning ripened over the ridge, and the fog rolled in, then out. The pipeline workers retreated, mostly without complaint — followed by the protestors’ calls of “Paid time off! Paid time off!” Some of those gathered began to sing: John Prine songs about beautiful landscapes stripped for coal, union songs, and striking miners’ ballads that reverberated through the same ridges long ago. When their voices grew weary, someone blared dance music through a loudspeaker as police cars rumbled up the gravel access road. They tried not to be afraid as the sirens grew louder, knowing the risk they had taken in coming here and knowing, as many said, that the time of act is now. 


    As the nation’s fracking boom reached coal country about a decade ago, pipelines carrying methane began to snake across the landscape. The Mountain Valley Pipeline, or MVP, met instant fury when Mountain Valley LLC proposed it in 2014. Opposition to the project drew a wide range of people, from farmers in West Virginia to Indigenous tribes in North Carolina, together in a united front. Some were alarmed by what it would mean for their land: Razed trees, disturbed landscapes, water running brown from the tap, and, in the end, a frightening risk of leaks and explosions. A pipeline in Pennsylvania run by one of the companies involved in MVP blew up late last year; a couple and their child suffered severe burns and barely escaped with their lives. Then there’s the longer term, irreversible danger of the 90 million metric tons of carbon dioxide that will come from producing, transporting, and burning all that methane over the 40 to 50 years the pipeline is expected to operate.

    Residents along the project’s path joined academics, local organizations, and environmental nonprofits in filing lawsuits, seeking injunctions, and packing hearings. As they worked the legal system, other activists staged equipment lockdowns, organized rallies, and took to the trees for months-long sit-ins. The efforts led to some wins. Opponents repeatedly delayed construction, got various permits thrown out, and leveled allegations of water quality violations and illegal work on national forest land. In late 2018, the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals issued a series of rulings annulling the pipeline’s access to federal land and striking down a key permit. The next year, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ordered an end to almost all construction. 

    The project languished until the summer of 2022, when Manchin, a key Democratic senate vote who often challenges his party, made his support of Biden’s climate agenda contingent upon the pipeline’s completion. Last summer, he included a provision in the debt ceiling deal that effectively cleared away any remaining hurdles. A short time later, the Supreme Court lifted a stay on construction through a 3.5-mile stretch through Jefferson National Forest. Crews returned to work with renewed vigor.

    So too did the protestors. Morning after morning, week after week, pipeline workers clocked in only to find their work impeded. Grannies locked to rocking chairs in the pipeline path, teenagers glued to construction equipment, worksites crowded by 20 to 30 people intent on stopping the day’s progress, more often than not, successfully. The campaign drew college students from nearby Roanoke, neighbors from across the mountains, seasoned organizers and newer activists with little experience, all part of a near decade-long coalition, all activated by the pipeline’s anticipated completion, and many ready to face legal consequences for opposing it.

    Jammie Hale joined the movement to stop the Mountain Valley Pipeline more than 5 years ago. Photo by Katie Myers / Grist

    Jammie Hale is a bespectacled and bearded 51-year-old from Giles County, Virginia. Before he joined the campaign to stop the pipeline five and a half years ago, he was depressed and struggling with addiction. It didn’t help that the ruckus of construction invaded his waking and sleeping hours as it got closer and closer to his home, which lies within the 500-foot blast zone that could level his house in an explosion. “After a while, you hear all that, it kind of gets under your skin,” he said with a gentle intensity. “You build these angers up inside you, and how do you release these angers? Through self harm?” He became sleepless, consumed with visions of his family, and the land he plans to deed to his children, going up in flames.

    When people began to organize, he and others in the community joined in. He found a will to live in the work. “I’m five years sober because of this project,”  Hale said. “Because, you know, I wanted to be useful.”

    Hale attended permit hearings, tested water, and, when people started sitting in trees, hiked up the mountain to support them. He brought home-cooked meals, blankets, and supplies, and rallied on the forest floor to boost their morale. “I instantly fell in love with these people because they were just so badass,” Hale said. He and his neighbors began to take more concerted action, filming and peacefully confronting pipeline company surveyors who came unannounced to survey their land for construction. Eventually, he found himself engaging in civil disobedience, fully aware of the risks he faces.

    Hale is among a growing number of protesters the Mountain Valley Pipeline company has targeted with injunctions, a potentially costly legal hassle that could lead to jail time for anyone found on a construction site. Local authorities are taking an increasingly dim view of folks like Hale and show little hesitation in pursuing them for even minor infractions as the company continues to seize their land through eminent domain. These days, Hale supports protestors from afar by making signs and sharing food, among other things. There’s still some risk, he says, but if he lands in a cell or a courtroom, so be it.

    “I’m not scared,” he said. “It’s kind of strange that they’re trying to get people for trespassing when they are the ones that have been trespassing.” 

    Another longtime pipeline fighter who goes by Larkin is no stranger to arrests, or to supporting people whose civil disobedience has landed them in court time and again. A soft-spoken health care worker from nearby Blacksburg, Virginia, Larkin, who is in her late 30s, has been fighting resource extraction in Appalachia since she was a teenager. She spent the better part of a decade marching onto dusty strip mines, locking herself to equipment, and demanding a federal ban on mountaintop removal coal mining. Ten years ago, that energy shifted toward the region’s multiplying pipelines. The Atlantic Coast Pipeline was proposed alongside the MVP; it met with similarly vehement opposition, and eventually died amid mounting legal costs and project delays. In short, protest worked, Larkin said. 

    A crowd of protesters with Stop Mountain Valley Pipeline rally and wave pickets in front of the White House.
    Protesters with Stop Mountain Valley Pipeline rally in front of the White House in Washington D.C. on June 8, 2023. Photo by Mostafa Bassim/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images

    With the  Supreme Court greenlighting the MVP, it seems to Larkin and others that there’s only one thing left to do. That is, throw their bodies upon the gears, in hopes of at least slowing things down for one more day, every day, for as long as possible, by force if nothing else.

    “We knew from the get-go that a chapter of the fight requiring an escalated level of resistance is going to come if folks have any hope in pushing back,” Larkin said. 

    Despite the risks, Larkin, and many others, feel they are taking ownership of their future and their dignity. When we fight, they say, we win, and it’s better that fossil fuel companies know their encroachments won’t go unchallenged. Larkin also feels it will deter future projects like the MVP. Without organized opposition, she feels the whole regulatory system will continue to rubber-stamp permits until the ocean overtakes Washington. 

    “Old men with no thought to the future are ruining things for all of us,” Larkin said. “It really is down to us to just be mad. And do it with our bodies and be in the way.”

    She  knows she’s never far from becoming a target of the Mountain Valley Pipeline company’s ire. Over the years, she’s seen friends locked up and beaten down at various protests, and sometimes it makes her feel old. After so long in the fight, her knees and back ache, and she can’t spend hours sitting on the floor painting banners like she used to. When she began this work, she burned herself out quickly, believing that the world would end if she didn’t give everything she had.  

     “When it’s so obvious that the world is on fire, it does feel like you have to put it out on the table all at once,” she said. “Just like, why think about the future, we have no future, kind of thing. And here we are, eight years later in this fight.”  

    Yet there are moments, even now, when the pipeline seems inevitable, when she feels the joy of having taken a stand, of having made lifelong friends, of having done the right thing.

    “I freaking love to have daybreak on a new blockade that has gone up in the night,” Larkin said, smiling. “And I think the other thing that I love is that I have really met and built real relationships of trust and solidarity with neighbors, people in my community who I wouldn’t have otherwise known.”  

    The pace is fast and the emotions run hot right now, but the stakes have felt high for a long time, Larkin said. She’s watched friends get sick, both from burnout and from the environmental risks of living near extraction, and watched some die of environmental illnesses and illnesses of stress and poverty. When trying to pinpoint exactly how the fight has lasted so long, Larkin points to the constant influx of new activists, particularly energized young people from nearby towns and colleges, and from other, similar campaigns.  

    One activist who goes by Gator had only just turned 18 and drifted north after a working-class childhood on the Gulf Coast of Louisiana. He felt disconnected and adrift at a military high school, beset by a gnawing sense of climate apocalypse and a bleak future. “My home is disappearing,” he said bluntly. 

    Gator found his way to the Weelaunee “Stop Cop City” occupation in Atlanta last summer. The connections he made there led him to the woods of Virginia and West Virginia, where he camped in the pipeline’s path and met people who shared his feelings of desperation and urgency.  

    He felt himself cross a Rubicon of sorts during a stint in jail after his arrest at another demonstration. He spent several days locked up, not knowing how much time had passed and listening to guards mock the people around him. As he sat there on the cold concrete bed, he knew there was no return to regular life, to regular expectations for himself.

    “It used to be that you’d be like, ‘I want to keep my nose clean, because I have a chance of having a career and  having, at least for me, and the people I love, a comfortable life,’” Gator said. “But even that is disappearing.” 

    Protestors head toward a Mountain Valley Pipeline construction site in the mountains near Elliston, Virginia, in October 2023.
    Protestors head toward a Mountain Valley Pipeline construction site in the mountains near Elliston, Virginia, in October 2023. Photo by Katie Myers / Grist

    The atmosphere in Elliston was, like the movement itself, at once nervous and defiant. Like environmental justice advocates most everywhere, those standing up to the Mountain Valley Pipeline are facing ever greater restrictions on their protests and increasingly harsh punishment for their actions.

    In September, Mountain Valley Pipeline LLC filed a lawsuit against more than 40 individuals and two organizations — Appalachians Against Pipelines and Rising Tide North America. The suit  seeks more than $4 million in damages and a ruling prohibiting the defendants from accessing construction sites, planning demonstrations, or raising funds for protest activities. The company said it decided to sue because protestors endanger themselves and workers, and because they’re breaking the law. 

    “If opponents were truly interested in environmental protection,” said MVP spokeswoman Natalie Cox, “they would have engaged with us to address their concerns through honest, open dialogue, which we respectfully offered on numerous occasions, rather than wasting agency resources and burdening the courts to support their myopic agendas.” Cox also blamed protesters for disrupting landowners and limiting the region’s economic opportunities.

    Such lawsuits — which activists and their attorneys often call a strategic action against public participation — are usually filed by corporate or government entities against people who speak out on a matter of public concern. Those fighting the pipeline say the suit is intended to chill protest and intimidate them. Mountain Valley Pipeline LLC has been regularly adding defendants to the suit, often after identifying them near protests or reading their names in the news. Many protesters have been charged with felonies in recent months, all for blocking construction.

    Despite a relative lack of trouble at the Peters Mountain lockdown – authorities arrested two people and quickly released them – the arraignment later that week proved more contentious. The two young activists were unexpectedly re-arrested and prosecutors slapped each of them with a felony kidnapping charge – presumably, protesters say, for asking construction workers to leave their vehicles – and held without bond. 

    According to Appalachians Against Pipelines, another protester, who goes by Pine, turned themself in on a felony warrant; they were charged with kidnapping and theft for holding up a work vehicle. A judge set bail at $25,000. Another protester was sentenced to six months, with three of them suspended, for similar charges. They are free pending an appeal. 

    “This system is seeking to doom us to a future that will not even exist,” Pine said in a statement. “However, there is solidarity everywhere … these ridiculous charges that I received do not make me afraid, since I know I do not stand alone.”

    Fear of arrest and imprisonment remains a restless undercurrent for many activists, said a young organizer who gave only her first name, Coral. She stepped away from fighting pipelines on tribal land to answer a call for support in central Appalachia..

    A crowed of protestors gathers behind a banner reading "Respect existence or expect resistance" at a Mountain Valley Pipeline construction site in the mountains of Virginia.
    Protestors gather at a Mountain Valley Pipeline construction site in rural Virginia in October, 2023, an effort to delay its completion. Photo courtesy Appalachians Against Pipelines

    “I’ve been grappling with the repression piece a lot because it is working,” said Coral, who identifies as Indigenous but would not state her affiliation for fear that it might help identify her. For her, and many of those fighting alongside her, the effort to stop the pipeline is a commitment to protecting unceded Indigenous land, and to building a world free from old, colonial, and extractive social structures. That obligation weighs heavily on her, though. The killing of an environmental activist at an ongoing forest blockade in Atlanta and the ceaseless violence against Native land defenders worldwide is never far from her mind. “Our people were persecuted and killed for fighting for our land,” she said. 

    And yet, despite it all, the pace of protest has increased since construction resumed. Few weeks go by without people locking themselves to equipment, blocking the pipeline route, or picketing banks that support the project and the company building it. Despite several frightening incidents, including one in which crews reportedly felled trees dangerously close to an activist, the blockades and lockdowns continue. The hope, many activists said, is to draw a critical mass of supporters to the region. The fight, they said, is far from over, and they hope to bring the same kind of energy sparked by the massive Dakota Access Pipeline protests.

    In Elliston, as the crisp October day warmed, the crowd was as energized and raucous as ever, echoing demands that have evolved over decades of environmental organizing in central Appalachia. Many hands unfurled colorful banners connecting the fight against climate change to movements opposing war, genocide, incarceration, and the theft of Indigenous land. Before long, though, several police cars slowly rolled up the road from the main highway, blocking the group’s exit. As officers stepped from their cars and made their way up the hill, some protesters with children in tow began to worry about their safety but remained for the moment. 

    As the police amassed, a young person of about 20, bundled in warm clothing and locked to an excavator, called down to the crowd. Their face couldn’t be seen, but their voice sounded small and very young. “I’m here because…these mountains are beautiful,” they called, laughing. “Appalachia is beautiful. This planet is beautiful!” Some in the crowd, though anxious, smiled at the voice speaking for them. The crowd held one another and swayed in the breeze as the drums started up again.

    “The judge has had it up to here with y’all,” one exasperated police officer remarked as some in the group talked him down from arresting everyone in sight, mothers and children and all. Other officers took photos of license plates and threatened to increase their retaliation if they saw any of the cars at another protest.

    When the group moved on to a neighboring plot owned by someone sympathetic to their cause, the police followed them, threatening to cite anyone who stuck around. Everyone knew that probably meant being added to MVP’s lawsuit. They decided to move along, but vowed to return another day.

    This story was originally published by Grist with the headline Inside the last-ditch effort to stop the Mountain Valley Pipeline on Jan 16, 2024.

    This post was originally published on Grist.

  • On Saturday 13 January, campaigners from Palestine Solidarity Cornwall (PSC) will gather in Truro to protest against the ongoing genocide the Israeli government is perpetrating against Palestinian people in Gaza. Meanwhile, the national march in London will be hosting a very special guest; one that has travelled around the world for the past few years.

    Palestine solidarity in Cornwall

    The Cornwall demonstration meets on Lemon Quay at 1pm, and will feature a variety of speakers, including people from the Palestinian community and representatives from local and national organisations.

    Groups supporting the protest include Cornwall Resists, the Bakers, Food, and Allied Workers union, Falmouth and Penryn Welcomes Refugees, Campaign Against Arms Trade, Penzance Socialists, and Divest Borders. During recent months, hundreds of people have taken to the streets across Cornwall, with events in Penzance, Falmouth, Newquay, and Truro highlighting the atrocities Israel is committing in Gaza, and standing in solidarity with Palestinian people.

    Protests have also focused on the UK government and the UK arms industry’s complicity in the war crimes taking place in Gaza.

    Since 2015, the UK has licensed £472m worth of arms sales to the Israeli government. However, this figure does not include open licenses where companies can export unlimited amounts of specified goods without further accountability, Components for the F35 combat aircraft that are currently bombarding Gaza are covered under one such open license. 15% of every F35 is made by UK industry, with contracts worth £336m since 2016, according to estimates by Campaign Against Arms Trade.

    ‘Beyond catastrophic’

    A spokesperson for PSC Cornwall stated:

    The situation in Gaza is beyond catastrophic. Thousands of people have died, including thousands of children. Hospitals have not only been targeted, they’ve been completely destroyed, refugee camps have been targeted. People have nowhere to go. There is no food and no access to aid. These are clear breaches of International Humanitarian Law.

    Under UK arms exports licensing conditions, arms sales should be immediately suspended when there is a clear risk they will be used to commit war crimes. It could not be clearer this is happening in Gaza but the UK government is refusing to take action.

    But we will not refuse to act. The UK government and the UK arms trade is complicit in genocide. We owe it to every single Palestinian person to continue protesting and to continue raising our voices. We are proud that Cornwall is part of this global day of action, and we refuse to be silenced while UK companies profit from the death of Palestinian children.

    Meanwhile, the national march in London will see a surprise visitor.

    Amal returns to the UK

    Little Amal is a global symbol of human rights and the rights of children in particular. The name Amal means “hope” in Arabic. She represents a nine-year-old Syrian refugee girl who travels alone across Europe to find her mother. She was created in 2021 for a project in which she walked between the Syrian-Turkey border and the UK to draw attention to the experience of refugees. Since then she has travelled the world and met millions of people.

    On Saturday Amal will bring hope as she walks with demonstrators calling for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, the lifting of Israel’s siege and immediate humanitarian relief.

    Israel’s bombardment of the Gaza Strip has claimed the lives of more than 23,000 Palestinians, including more than 10,000 children. Thousands more are missing, presumed dead. More than 85% of the population of Gaza have been displaced and more than 60% of buildings damaged or destroyed. The UN has warned one in four people in Gaza are starving as Israel refuses to allow in adequate supplies and destroys food infrastructure.

    ‘Hope’ for Gaza and the Occupied Territories

    Amir Nizar Zuabi, artistic director of the Walk Productions and a Palestinian, said:

    Amal has become a symbol of the vulnerability and resilience of the millions of people that met her or followed her journey. On Saturday Amal walks for those most vulnerable and for their bravery and resilience. Amal is a child and a refugee and today in Gaza childhood is under attack, with an unfathomable number of children killed. Childhood itself is being targeted. That’s why we walk.

    Ben Jamal, national Palestine Solidarity Campaign director, said :

    Israel has tried to ensure that Palestinians feel nothing but despair as they conduct a genocide in Gaza. But the world stands in solidarity with Palestinians and millions of people will protest this weekend in cities around the world.

    Amal means hope in Arabic, and her presence in London on the March for Palestine, as part of a Global Day of Action, gives us not just hope but determination to continue our campaign not only to end Israel’s current bombardment of the Gaza Strip, but to end the decades of military occupation and the system of apartheid under which Palestinians have lived for over 75 years.

    Featured image via PSC

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Janine Jackson interviewed Defending Rights & Dissent’s Chip Gibbons about the right to protest for the January 5, 2024, episode of CounterSpin. This is a lightly edited transcript.

          CounterSpin240105Gibbons.mp3

     

    Janine Jackson: The last several years have provided ample reason for public protest, and many people have been doing just that, including some who never had before. This country has a much-vaunted history of vocal public dissent, but we know that that is intertwined with a sadder history of efforts by the powerful to silence those voices.

    As we move into 2024, and reasons to speak up and out go unabated, what should we know about our right to protest? What should concern us, or give us hope?

    Chip Gibbons is a journalist, researcher and activist, and policy director at Defending Rights & Dissent. He joins us now by phone. Welcome back to CounterSpin, Chip Gibbons.

    Chip Gibbons: Well, thank you for having me back, and I can think of no better way to start the new year than with CounterSpin. Obviously, not a day goes by that I’m not thankful for independent media, but the last few months, I think, have stressed the importance of programs like yours, given the low-quality reporting coming out of the corporate media at a time when courageous journalism is most needed.

    JJ: Absolutely. Well, thank you very much, and I absolutely concur.

    I wanted to ask you about the landscape in general, but first maybe a little basic education. On RightsAndDissent.org, folks can find a kind of guide on challenges to protest, and also the importance of protest. Because sometimes you do still hear people say that people marching or boycotting should just “use proper channels,” that society has mechanisms to resolve every conflict within the rules that protest seems to break. Can you talk about the rights that we do have to public protest, and why those rights are so important?

    CG: Sure. So at Defending Rights & Dissent, we like to say that we defend your right to know and your freedom to act. We oppose government secrecy and the government attempts to hide its own crimes, and we also defend the rights of the people to take to the streets, to call their members of Congress, to engage in dissent.

    Dissent is vital to our democracy, and, I believe I’ve commented in the past, protest is the tool by which we realize our democracy, that we realize the democratic ambitions of our country. The right to protest is both a fundamental right, and it is a core tool for achieving other fundamental rights. Without the right to protest, we wouldn’t have made as much progress as we have on civil rights (and I know there’s a lot more progress to be made); we wouldn’t have made as much progress on women’s rights, on LGBTQ rights, on peace and disarmament (although that cause feels very far from being realized these days).

    But what progress we have made has been through grassroots, from-the-bottom social movement, not from benevolent elites being, like, well, let’s grant the people their rights today.

    JJ: It’s interesting, the view towards protest—not just among the public, but also in news media—where once a protest is 10 or 20 years in the past, it can become acceptable, but the protests that are going on today are somehow categorically different, and we should be challenging them. And then of course, it matters very much who’s doing the protesting and why.

    CounterSpin: ‘Misremembering King Rewrites the Press’s Own Role in History’

    CounterSpin (1/20/17)

    CG: The civil rights movement is the quintessential example of that. You look at the media coverage of Martin Luther King and his protests during his lifetime, I mean, they accused him of inciting violence, they accused him of rioting. All the things they say about protestors today, you heard the same claims about, “Why are you disrupting things, why are you alienating people?”

    And at the end of his life, he was an extremely unpopular person, including with many Black Americans. He did not have high approval ratings. And now we have a Martin Luther King holiday, rightfully so. We have a Martin Luther King memorial.

    People who are trying to shut down protests or advance racism cite him, as well as people who are doing the opposite. He has entered the lexicon of great historical figures that everybody, no matter how comical what they’re doing is, cites. So I think that’s a really great example.

    Look at the Iraq War. John Pilger died recently, and I was watching some of the interviews he did with journalists in the run-up to the war, and the way they’re attacking him. And 20 years later, they’d like to pretend that they were doing what he was doing.

    JJ: And all is perspective.

    We’ve sort of transitioned, I guess, into the challenges, because anyone who has been on a march calling for ceasefire, end of occupation in Gaza; calling for voting rights, women’s rights, LBGTQ; people have been in the street, just in this past year, quite a lot.

    It’s often very transformative, and it makes you feel good, and you see your community.

    But there also can be an element of fear involved, when you see just lines and lines of police, armed police, that are kind of girding you in, or when you’re being shoved around by law enforcement, and you can stand there, but you can’t stand here. Protest is not without some elements of fear and of difficulty.

    And we see that there are legislators who like it that way. And that’s part of where the fight is, too. It’s not just in the street, but it’s also in the courtrooms and the capitals, as you say.

    CG: Absolutely. And I did want to comment that I do believe in the transformative power of protests. I remember the first protest I ever went to, in 2005, against the Iraq War, and just showing up at the New Carrollton Metro station on a Saturday, and having to park in the overflow lot, and wait in this long line of people with anti-war signs. And you remember, if you were opposed to the Iraq War, they made you feel demonized and isolated. And to see 300,000 to 600,000 people who believed the same thing I believed about the war was really, really powerful, and really inspiring.

    And I also think that politicians, when they see—they’ll never admit this—tens or hundreds of thousands of people taking the streets, it scares them.

    I mean, look at US support for Israel. For decades, it’s been entirely unchallenged. Everyone goes along with it, or they get kicked out of public life. And you’ve had protests before; I’ve been to many protests against massacres in Gaza over the last 15 years.

    But now you have these huge protests, very youthful in many cases, very vibrant, very disruptive. And I think it’s very challenging to people who have been in Washington for 30 or 40 years, and every year rubber-stamp the sending of aid to Israel.

    Defending Rights & Dissent: Israel-Gaza War Has Dissent Under Fire At Home

    Defending Rights & Dissent (10/12/23)

    And I think it’s hard to talk about the future of dissent in this country this year without talking about what’s happening in Gaza, because that looms over everything. And we’re seeing a real outburst of protest around the ceasefire, around the occupation, around apartheid. And we’re also seeing a real heavy-handed attempt to demonize and repress these movements.

    There’s always been what’s called a Palestine exception to free speech. Palestine supporters have been censored, jailed, spied on for decades. So this isn’t entirely new, but the level of public vitriol, where you have Congress passing resolutions condemning student groups, Congress passing resolutions that condemn university presidents, Congress calling on the FBI (this isn’t a resolution, these are just letters from individual members of the Congress) to investigate media outlets for these conspiracy theories that they had freelancers who—and mainstream ones, like New York Times; they’re not talking about small left-wing publications—were somehow involved in October 7.

    It’s a really dark time, and I know a lot of people I talk to feel very strongly that the repression will backfire, because the movement is so strong, and people are so disgusted by what our government is complicit in. And I think that’s potentially true.

    But I do have to caution: Before World War I, the left was very powerful in this country. The Socialist Party had members of Congress, they had mayors. And the repression of that war completely decimated them.

    In the run-up to the Cold War, the FBI had all these internal files about how powerful they think the Communist Party is, that people are taking them seriously, that liberals work with them, that the 1930s were a pink decade or a red decade, and the FBI security apparatus is going to be like penicillin to the spread of the pink decade.

    So a lot of the periods of repression have followed the left when it was at its strongest, not when it was at its weakest. And I’m not saying we’re going to be decimated, like we were during World War I or during McCarthyism, but I do think we should be cautious, that repression does have an impact, and it does follow popular movement successes.

    And I do think part of the reason why we see this unhinged level of repression around the Gaza War—if you want to call it war; it’s more of a genocide—is because the atrocities that are being committed are so horrifying that even if you’re someone who doesn’t think Israel’s an apartheid state, even if you’re a centrist, it’s hard to watch and hear about hospitals being targeted, to hear about refugee camps being blown up, and not be morally repulsed by what you’re seeing.

    And I do think that people know that, and that’s why they’re escalating the ratcheting up of oppression around the ceasefire protest. Because there’s no defense of bombing a refugee camp. There’s no defense of having snipers outside a Catholic church and shooting church women who are going to use the restroom. There’s not really a strong defense of this. You can either deny it, or try to shut everyone up.

    CNN Business: Harvard student groups issued an anti-Israel statement. CEOs want them blacklisted

    CNN (1/10/24)

    JJ: And I think you’re right to point out that, “well, we’ll all get through it because everyone’s feeling so strongly about it”—we do have to count up the losses.

    And not everything is legislation. We had these business leaders saying, “I want a list of all of the student activists, so that I can make sure that no one ever hires them.” These are follow-on impacts that will absolutely affect some people’s lives. I agree that that’s important to keep in mind, and to be mindful of.

    I’m going to switch you just a little bit, because I know it is something that you want to talk about. One of the tools of political imprisonment and silencing is forgetfulness: out of sight, out of mind. We have a deep problem in this country of once someone is behind bars, in one way or another, we don’t hear from them. Just materially, it’s difficult to get access to people. And then, also, there is kind of an acceptance that they must be guilty of something if they’re in prison, even if it is a political imprisonment.

    And of course I’m talking about Julian Assange, and I know that many people think, oh, he’s not the only political prisoner, there’s a lot of other things going on. But there’s a reason that the Assange case is so important for people who are journalists, or people who care about journalism, as well as people who care about the public’s right to know. It’s not just any old case.

    So let me ask you for a little update, because it seems like, oddly, things seem to be shifting, at least in terms of congressional support, maybe, for Assange’s case. What’s going on right now with him?

    Intercept: Members of Congress Make New Push to Free Julian Assange

    Intercept (10/24/23)

    CG: So last year we saw the first congressional letter calling for the charges to be dropped against Julian Assange. It was led by Rashida Tlaib, and the entire expanded Squad signed on to it. It went to Merrick Garland. It was the first of its kind.

    Later that year, a number of Australian parliamentarians visited the US, a real interesting cross section of the Australian political system, who had very different reasons for supporting freeing Assange–everything from, they felt like he was a political prisoner, to we work with the US national security state and our people are really angry about Assange, and you’re going to make it impossible for us to continue to help you. Full range of opinions.

    And that spawned a second letter, a bipartisan letter, a bicameral letter, with both Republicans and Democrats on it, led by Thomas Massie and Jim McGovern. And that letter went to Biden, and there were both Republicans and Democrats on that one. All of the signatories of the original letter were on it. And you had a senator, Rand Paul, on it. And it’s really an interesting coalition, because there are libertarians I respect who have been very good on this issue. There are progressives who should be good on this issue and are getting better. And then there’s some of the MAGA people, who I don’t terribly care for, even a little bit, but they’re on the letters too.

    So it’s a strange bedfellows moment, but it has really been pushed by the fact that you have every single civil liberties and press freedom group and major newspaper being like, “This is an existential threat to the future of press freedom.”

    NYT: Major News Outlets Urge U.S. to Drop Its Charges Against Assange

    New York Times (11/28/22)

    And you have to keep going to these offices and telling them, you, Mr. Progressive, you care so much about press freedom. You hate the threat to democracy Donald Trump was. Here’s what the New York Times and Reporters Without Borders say about what we’re doing to Julian Assange. How can you have any credibility on those other issues when you ignore this horrifying assault on the First Amendment?

    And, again, it is an existential issue to press freedom. And it’s particularly troubling right now because, remember, Assange is going to be on trial for exposing US war crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan. Look at the war crimes that are taking place in Gaza. And, of course, Assange was the last one they went for, the journalist, the publisher, and that was crossing a Rubicon. But they went after the whistleblowers and the sources first. They went after Chelsea Manning, Daniel Hale—the drone whistleblower is still in prison.

    So I would say this has even greater urgency, because you have people in the government right now who are dissenting about the Gaza War. You have people in the press who I think want to challenge some of these narratives. And then you have, at the same time, a government whistleblower in prison for exposing lies about the US drone programs, and a publisher they’re trying to extradite for exposing lies to the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.

    We’ve always talked about the chilling effect these types of policies have, these types of persecutions have—I’m not going to call them prosecutions; they’re persecutions. And in a moment where we have an outbreak of dissent within the public, within the government, about this horrible war our government is part of, similar to what happened with Dan Ellsberg around Vietnam, similar to what happened to the War on Terror and people like Snowden and John Kiriakou and Thomas Drake. And we are going to London, the US is, in February to try Julian Assange’s final appeal, to try to bring him here. And Daniel Hale is still being held in the communications management unit.

    What message does it send to the whistleblowers of today? And if WikiLeaks hadn’t been so repressed, what role would they be playing right now in this Gaza War?

    JJ: Let me just ask you, finally, I’m reading through the stuff on Assange. Of course the Espionage Act comes up a lot. Are there changes, policy changes or legal changes, that could prevent future cases like we saw?

    CG: Absolutely. And we’ve worked with a number of offices over the years, including Tulsi Gabbard, Rashida Tlaib, Ilhan Omar and Cori Bush (a range of offices, I know) around what we think is the best proposal to reforming the Espionage Act, was supported by the late Dan Ellsberg, who we lost and—

    JJ: Much missed.

    CG: I miss his counsel on this issue. That would raise the burden for what the government has to prove to get an Espionage Act conviction, as well as make sure the jury can hear about why the whistleblower or journalist did what they did, as well as allow a public interest defense, as well as limit the Espionage Act to people with a duty to protect classified information.

    WaPo: U.S. had intelligence of detailed Ukrainian plan to attack Nord Stream pipeline

    Washington Post (6/6/23)

    So as the Espionage Act is written, if I read in the Washington Post that there’s classified documents that indicate Ukraine was involved in the Nord Stream Pipeline bombing, and I say, “Hey Janine, did you see that Washington Post article?”—I’ve technically broken the letter of the Espionage Act. Obviously, it would never be applied that way, but [the proposal would be] limiting it so it does not apply to journalists, publishers, members of the general public. And in those cases where it can be applied, it could only be applied to those who are engaged in harming the US deliberately, not whistleblowing.

    And I don’t want to be counting my chickens before they hatch, but I do think it’s very likely—especially with Dan’s passing, and people wanting to commemorate that—we will see something put forward in the Congress this year that is similar to what has been proposed by Tlaib and Omar and Bush as amendments to the National Defense Authorization Act. Probably shouldn’t have said that, but I guess I did.

    JJ: It’s out there now. Well, and then—I said finally, but finally finally—what about just fortifying the right to protest generally? We’re seeing the efforts to criminalize protest of various sorts, from boycotting to marching in particular places. There are efforts, though, to shore up that fundamental right as well. I mean, we can do it, I think, by protesting, first of all. But are there efforts going on to support us in that fundamental right to speak up?

    CG: It’s really difficult, because so many of the efforts are reactionary, in that people put forward bad proposals and we fight them. For years, Defending Rights & Dissent has tried to put forward proactive legislation enshrining the right to protest. But that gets kind of complicated, because we don’t want this to be the limit. We don’t want to inadvertently give the police like, “Whoa, this wasn’t in the bill. You can’t do this.” And, also, people are more motivated to defend a right that’s being lost than to affirmatively protect it.

    JJ:  I understand.

    Chip Gibbons

    Chip Gibbons: “Don’t let them intimidate you. Don’t be silenced. The First Amendment gives you the right to speak and act for your conscience.”

    CG: But we have proposals at Rights & Dissent that you could pass in your local community, that would help to affirm the right to protest. It’s just, everyone is so focused on the defense, including us, that it’s difficult to be proactive. But if anyone is interested in that, get on the RightsAndDissent.org website and contact us.

    JJ: Absolutely. And it’s at least a conversation. Part of the freedom just comes from the ability to talk about it, and to talk about what we want to do and what we should be able to do, and how we support one another in the various protests and dissenting actions that we’re taking, that we stay in communication with one another.

    CG: Absolutely.

    JJ: All right, any final thoughts, Chip Gibbons, as we go forward, bravely as we can muster, into 2024, asserting our right to protest and to dissent?

    CG: Don’t be silent. Don’t let them intimidate you. Don’t be silenced. The First Amendment gives you the right to speak and act for your conscience. It gives you the right to come together with other Americans to collectively work to change the world, and make this a country that reflects our values. And we should never voluntarily surrender those rights.

    JJ: All right, then. We’ve been speaking with Chip Gibbons, policy director at Defending Rights & Dissent. They’re online at RightsAndDissent.org. Chip Gibbons, thank you, as always, for joining us this week on CounterSpin.

    CG: Thank you for having me.

     

     

     

    The post ‘Protest Is the Tool by Which We Realize Our Democracy’ appeared first on FAIR.

    This post was originally published on FAIR.

  • Human Rights Watch’s annual report highlights politicians’ double standards and ‘transactional diplomacy’ amid escalating crises

    Human rights across the world are in a parlous state as leaders shun their obligations to uphold international law, according to the annual report of Human Rights Watch (HRW).

    In its 2024 world report, HRW warns grimly of escalating human rights crises around the globe, with wartime atrocities increasing, suppression of human rights defenders on the rise, and universal human rights principles and laws being attacked and undermined by governments.

    Continue reading…

    This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.

  • As Israel faces the charge of genocide at the International Court of Justice (ICJ), protests are planned in more than 60 cities, in at least 36 countries, across 6 continents. With this, the seventh national march for Palestine in London on Saturday 13 January is part of a global day of action mobilising for a full ceasefire in Gaza. Meanwhile, South Africa’s Jewish Board of Deputies has accused its government of antisemitism over genocide accusations.

    Israel: genocide 101?

    Currently, lawyers for South Africa are presenting their case at the UN’s top court in the Hague, where the country lodged an urgent appeal to force Israel to “immediately suspend” its military operations in Gaza.

    South Africa argues that Israel is breaking its commitments under the UN Genocide Convention, alleging the bombing and invasion of Gaza is “intended to bring about the destruction of a substantial part of the Palestinian national, racial, and ethnical group”. “No armed attack on a state territory no matter how serious… can provide justification for or defend breaches of the convention,” Justice Minister Ronald Lamola told the court.

    Israeli far-right president Isaac Herzog has dismissed the accusations as “atrocious” and “preposterous”. Predictably, South Africa’s Jewish Board of Deputies (BoD) has also condemned the legal action, accusing the government of antisemitism and of “inverting reality”. “These charges have at their root an antisemitic worldview, which denies Jews their rights to defend themselves,” the body’s chair Karen Milner said on Thursday.

    So, against this backdrop people will be marching around the world again – showing their opposition to Israel’s bombardment of the Gaza Strip which has claimed the lives of more than 23,000 Palestinians, the majority of them being women and children.

    Marching for Palestine globally

    On 13 January hundreds of thousands of people are expected to demonstrate in London on a National March for Palestine. They will be joining millions more who will be marching in more than 60 cities, in least 36 countries, across 6 continents, in a global day of action for Palestine. The global day of action was called by the UK organising coalition comprising the Palestine Solidarity Campaign, Palestinian Forum in Britain, Stop the War Coalition, Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament, Friends of Al Aqsa, and the Muslim Association of Britain.

    Israel’s actions are causing outrage around the world and now for the first time a global mobilisation of Palestinian solidarity has been organised this weekend. Saturday will be the 99th day of Israel’s offensive on Gaza, and there will be demonstrations in dozens of cities in countries including the UK, US, Canada, France, Germany, Switzerland, Denmark, South Africa, Nigeria, Ghana, Japan, Indonesia, South Korea, Australia, Brazil, Jordan, and Turkey.

    The march in London will be the seventh national demonstration since October, which together with five days of action constitutes one of the largest, sustained political campaigns in British history.

    ‘Charge Israel with the gravest of crimes’

    Ben Jamal, PSC Director, said:

    The world needs to charge Israel with the gravest of crimes – genocide – not just in the International Court of Justice, but in the court of global public opinion. In the face of the failure of Governments, including the UK, to act to uphold International law and defend fundamental human rights, people continue to take to the streets to protest, week after week.

    This Saturday, from Australia to South America, from Dacca to Washington, people of conscience will show the world demands a full ceasefire and an end to Israel’s impunity from international law.

    London has been at the forefront of these global protests, attracting hundreds of thousands of solidarity campaigners despite Government hostility and Opposition indifference. Once again on Saturday we will show the majority of British people stand with Palestinians in this dark hour of their decades of oppression.

    A permanent ceasefire must be the starting point to address the underlying causes, including Israeli military occupation and a system of oppression against the Palestinian people that is considered internationally to meet the legal definition of apartheid. We will continue to march, demonstrate, and organise to demand justice for the Palestinian people.

    Demanding ceasefires and permanent solutions

    CND general secretary Kate Hudson said:

    More than 23,000 people have been killed as a result of Israel’s invasion and bombing of Gaza, with thousands more suffering from a lack of food, clean water, and medical supplies.

    Millions of people will take to the streets across the world this Saturday, to demand a permanent ceasefire and a lasting political settlement for all Palestinians. The UK government must end its support for Israel’s brutal war in Gaza, and join the wider international community in condemning its war crimes.

    The longer the conflict continues, the greater the chance of regional tensions spilling over into a wider regional war which could see nuclear use. It must be ended as quickly as possible.

    The Jeremy Corbyn-founded Peace and Justice Project said:

    Last weekend, thousands of people demonstrated in town centres and cities across the country. From vigils in Abergavenny to BDS [Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions] tours in Bath to rallies outside Starmer’s office in Camden we will continue to speak up for the rights of Palestinians and call for an immediate ceasefire.

    This Saturday there will be a national demonstration in Central London – the first one of the year – where our whole movement will gather to demand a full, permanent and immediate ceasefire. If you can, please join us in London on Saturday and let’s help make this one of the biggest demonstrations that we have seen.

    Featured image via PSC

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Four Just Stop Oil supporters were acquitted of willful obstruction of the highway on Monday 8 January, as the Judge declared they had a lawful excuse for their actions. Meanwhile, another case against Just Stop Oil supporters has been cancelled due to a lack of a primary witness.

    Judge agrees with Just Stop Oil and acquits activists

    Miranda Forward, Dave Boden, Chris Hardy, and Annotony Cottam appeared before District Judge Lloyd at Stratford Magistrates court. The four Just Stop Oil supporters peacefully blocked roads into Parliament Square with 60 others on the 4 October 2022. Their actions were part of a month of continuous action to ‘Occupy Westminster’ in order to demand that the government call a halt to all new fossil fuel licenses and consents.

    The prosecution was relying on helicopter footage of Parliament Square from the day in question, however, finding no evidence of ‘significant disruption’, Judge Lloyd delivered a not-guilty verdict.

    The court heard the supporters of Just Stop Oil argue that blocking the roads to Parliament Square was proportionate under articles 10 and 11 of the European Convention of Human Rights – the rights to freedom of expression, assembly, and association. Judge Lloyd agreed that there was a lawful excuse for their actions, addressing the defendants directly she said that their motivations “could not be more important”.

    One of those acquitted yesterday, Boden, said:

    For the sake of future generations, other animals and for our life-support systems, I felt I had no other choice but to act in face of climate breakdown, given that our government acts in defiance of all science and reason.

    ‘Politics is failing us – arrest the real criminals in government’

    A Just Stop Oil spokesperson said:

    Instead of prosecuting grandmothers, students and doctors, the courts and police should focus on the breakdown of ordered society that is a guaranteed side effect of more oil extraction. It is a waste of public money, police time, court time and our time. Of Just Stop Oil supporters arrested, less than 50% have ended up in a conviction.

    Politics is failing us, it is time to arrest the real criminals in Government, who are planning the deaths of countless millions for the sake of profiting the richest corporations.

    These acquittals come as a case against supporters of Just Stop Oil was discontinued by the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS).

    Supporters of Just Stop Oil were expected to appear at City of London Magistrates court on Tuesday 9 January, charged with breaching section 12 of the Public Order Act after marching peacefully in Parliament square on 19 July 2023. They were joined by 160 supporters of Just Stop Oil marching across London in resistance against new oil and gas.

    They were informed that the trial would not go ahead as the chief inspector due to testify against the supporters of Just Stop Oil was on holiday.

    Just Stop Oil supporters are refusing to allow the breakdown of ordered society and a collapse of the rule of law as a result of the selfish actions of a few. The people of the UK have had enough of the corruption and lies of the people leading the country off a very steep cliff. Just Stop Oil is calling on everyone to step into civil resistance in order to save our communities from the worst of climate breakdown. It is not a case of ‘if’ we will win, but ‘when’.

    Featured image via Just Stop Oil

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Representatives of Just Stop Oil met with the Met Police on Monday 8 January to discuss relations going forward, after the police requested the group meet with them late last year. Its supporters caused significant disruption in the capital last year, demanding that the UK government immediately halts all new licences and consents for fossil fuel exploration and extraction.

    Just Stop Oil: meeting with the Met

    At 1pm representatives of Just Stop Oil – Sarah Lunnon, Indigo Rumbelow and Eben Lazarus – met with officers Karen Findlay, Simon Hearn, and Sian Thomas at the Met’s office at 109 Lambeth Road:

    The meeting comes after a request from Commander Kyle Gordon that the group:

    come forward and speak with us, so we can actually work with them.

    As the Canary previously reported, Just Stop Oil responded with a letter on 8 December 2023 proposing a meeting with Rowley.

    Who are the real criminals?

    The group’s co-founder Lunnon said:

    We met with Metropolitan Police to present evidence that by developing new oil and gas projects, the activities of the British Government constitute an act of ‘genocide by oblique intent’, as defined under Article 30 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.

    Public Order Commander Karen Findlay requested a copy of our evidence and told us she will be taking this information to the Commissioner and Specialist Operations – which covers genocide crimes. We have offered a pause on disruptive Just Stop Oil actions if this investigation is to go ahead. Negotiations are ongoing.

    Just Stop Oil is calling on the police to investigate and charge the real criminals who are responsible for this unfolding genocide – they can start with PM Rishi Sunak, Shell CEO Wael Sawan, Lloyd’s London CEO John Neal, Barclay’s Chair Nigel Higgens, and Telegraph owner Fred Barclay.

    Article 30 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court states that a person shall be criminally responsible and liable for punishment for a crime within the jurisdiction of the Court if the perpetrator clearly has an understanding that significant loss of human life will occur ‘in the ordinary course of events’ after undertaking a course of action.

    Lazarus remarked:

    Last year the Dutch Police Federation, ANPV, Equipe and ACP [police unions] wrote an open letter to the Dutch Government demanding that the government listen to the public as they cried out for a safe and sustainable future. NPCC lead for Protest Policing Chief Constable Chris Noble has said ‘we’re not going to arrest our way out of environmental protest’.

    The Met have told us that their primary concern at this moment is policing ‘environmental protests’. We wasted no time informing them that if new oil and gas licences are granted, then not only protest but disruption and violence should be expected when the public are in danger of flood, fire, and famine. How will they uphold public order when there’s no food on the shelves?

    The potential for a violent response

    The Met has recently released its Force Management Statement 2023. It drew a link between potential terrorism and:

    environmentalism, given the ever-increasing sentiment within this lobby and a sense of not being listened to by the Government.

    Just Stop Oil responded by affirming its nonviolent ethos, but noting that without immediate political action on the climate crisis then:

    the Police are right, there is the potential for a violent response. The route to avoiding this is to end new oil and gas and mobilise the country to deal with climate breakdown.

    Featured image via Stephen Gingell/Just Stop Oil

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  •       CounterSpin240105.mp3

     

    Jewish Voice for Peace in Grand Central Terminal, protesting the Israeli assault on Gaza.

    (image: Jewish Voice for Peace)

    This week on CounterSpin: It was a big deal when Jewish Americans who oppose US support for Israel’s genocidal war on Gaza filled New York’s Grand Central Terminal. But not big enough to make the front page of the local paper, the New York Times. US journalists invoke the First Amendment a lot, but not so much when it extends to regular folks using their individual voices, sometimes at significant personal risk, to say NO to something the US government is doing in their name.

    Some listeners may remember marching with thousands of others in advance of the US war on Iraq, only to come home and find the paper or TV station ignored them utterly, or distorted their effort and their message—as when NBC’s Tom Brokaw reported a Washington, DC, anti-war march of at least 100,000 people, met with a couple hundred pro-war counter-protesters, as: “Opponents and supporters of the war marched in cities across the nation on Saturday.”

    “Protest is the voice of the people,” our guest’s organization states. Defending Rights & Dissent aims to invigorate the Bill of Rights and, crucially, to protect our right to political expression. We talk with Chip Gibbons, policy director at Defending Rights & Dissent, this week on CounterSpin.

          CounterSpin240105Gibbons.mp3

     

    Plus Janine Jackson takes a quick look at the media’s role in the recent Republican primary debates.

          CounterSpin240105Banter.mp3

     

    The post Chip Gibbons on the Right to Protest appeared first on FAIR.

    This post was originally published on CounterSpin.

  • On Saturday 6 January, protests will take place across the UK regarding Israel’s ongoing genocide in Gaza. However, at two locations there is a different focus – with one calling for solidarity with activists facing trial, and another calling on Labour leader Keir Starmer to effectively fix up.

    UK protests over Israel’s genocide number 100 on 6 January

    Tens of thousands of people across the UK are expected to protest in the fifth national Day of Action against Israel’s attacks on Gaza:

    • Up to 100 actions are taking place across the UK.
    • As Israel is charged with genocide at the International Court of Justice, the demand grows for a permanent ceasefire and lifting of Israel’s illegal siege to allow in desperately needed humanitarian aid.
    • UK political leaders are urged to stop their complicity in Israeli war crimes.

    The Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC) said in a press release:

    Tens of thousands of British people will show their opposition to Israel’s bombardment of the Gaza Strip which has claimed the lives of more than 22 000 Palestinians, the majority of whom are women and children. Thousands more are missing, presumed dead. More than 85% of the population of Gaza have been displaced, more than 60% of buildings damaged or destroyed. Nearly 2 million people face winter without safety from bombing or the basics of human survival – shelter, adequate food and water.

    This will be the fifth national Day of Action and it’s a continuation of the protests that have been held ever since Israel began its attacks on Gaza in early October. It comes the week before a seventh national March for Palestine in London on January 13th, which is expected to draw hundreds of thousands of people to protest against Israeli war crimes and the UK government’s complicity.

    There are actions from Bath to Wolverhampton – protests, rallies, petitions, fundraising and marches, mainly led by Palestine Solidarity Campaign’s network of branches across the UK. Several protests will highlight the complicity of corporations like Barclays Bank, which holds over £1 billion in shares, and provides over £3 billion in loans and underwriting to 9 companies whose weapons, components, and military technology have been used in Israel’s armed violence against Palestinians.

    Free the #Bristol7

    First up, 6 January will see the latest of the fortnightly local Palestine marches organised by the group “Bristol Palestine Alliance” (BPA). People will assemble at 12.00 noon at the bandstand on Castle Park, BS2 0HQ for circular march around Broadmead shopping centre followed by a rally back at the Bandstand.

    The event will headline the message “Stop Arming Israel”. In addition to conventional banners and flags the march aims to carry a 30m-long banner which reads “From Slave Trade to Arms Trade Bristol says NO” which includes an image of a slave ship and a modern-day missile.

    Organisers say this is “probably the longest banner ever carried on a march in Bristol”. In addition, the march will have banners showing solidarity with the “Elbit Seven” who are due to start their jury trial at Bristol Crown Court on Monday 8th January.

    The “Elbit Seven” are charged with breaking into the Elbit UK Technical Headquarters in Aztec West Business Park in Patchway on “Nakba Day” (15 May) 2022 and causing substantial damage to the building and the interior. You can read more on the #Bristol7 here.

    ‘No happy new year for the people of Gaza’

    A spokesperson for the BPA said:

    There is no happy new year for the people of Gaza. The situation and the suffering of the people can only be described as apocalyptic.

    This Saturday 6 January, the day of our march, will be the 92nd day of the attack – with the civilian population deprived of adequate food, water, shelter, and medical aid. Imagine if that was happening to us here in Bristol? The death toll has passed 22,000 and over 57,000 have been injured, plus many more unaccounted for under the rubble. Many hospitals have been attacked with the remaining staff sometimes having to carry our operations such as amputations without anesthetics. According to UNRWA, 1.9 million people, or nearly 85% of the total population of Gaza, are internally displaced.

    They continued:

    What’s even more shocking is this country is helping supply the weapons. Britain has a massive two-way arms trade with Israel. Added to that there are arms companies in north Bristol which are not only linking up with our universities but also supplying essential parts for the US planes being supplied to Israel and used to bomb Gaza. Plus the big name that stands out now is the Israeli arms company, Elbit, which is currently opening a new factory site in Patchway.

    The BPA spokesperson concluded:

    Bristol is the city that prides itself, correctly, for standing on the right side of history. We’ve faced up to the shocking involvement in the slave trade historically. Now we should say NO to the arms industry.

    Starmer: toothless

    Meanwhile, in north London people will also be marching on the offices of Starmer and Labour MP Tulip Siddiq – calling for the Labour Party to support an immediate ceasefire:

    As Not The Andrew Marr Show said in an email:

    With Labour’s leader still refusing to condemn Israel’s genocide or call for a permanent ceasefire, Camden Palestinian Solidarity Campaign and Brent & Harrow Palestinian Solidarity Campaign have joined up for a march to the offices of Starmer and Tulip Siddiq.

    The march assembles at 12:30pm at Chalk Farm and Kentish Town stations before marching to Camden Town and Mornington Crescent for the final rally at 2pm.

    The show will have footage and interviews from the protest on its Sunday 7 January edition. You can sign up to watch via the link in the X post below:

    Permanent ceasefire, now

    Overall, PSC Director Ben Jamal said:

    The international community is beginning to confront the reality that Israel’s actions in Gaza amount to the crime of genocide, as they demonstrate an “intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group”. Israel is attempting to erase the foundations of Palestinian life in Gaza and ethnically cleanse the population. The government of South Africa has led the way in charging Israel at the International Court of Justice, and shown up the hypocrisy of UK political leaders who pay lip service to human rights and the application of international law, but actually support Israel’s crimes through diplomatic cover, military cooperation and arms sales.

    This Saturday, ordinary people across the UK will come out again to show that the vast majority of them support the demand for a permanent ceasefire and stand in solidarity with the people of Palestine. They will also demand the root causes are addressed – Israel’s decades-long military occupation of Palestinian territories and its system of apartheid against Palestinians. We demand justice for the Palestinian people – their right to self-determination and to live in freedom, dignity and with equality.

    Find out more about the local protests here.

    Featured image via BBC iPlayer

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • On Monday 8 January, seven Palestine Action activists will be entering Bristol Crown Court for a four week trial, charged with burglary and criminal damage after allegedly entering, occupying, and dismantling Elbit’s Bristol headquarters in May 2022. The activists will plead not guilty to the charges against them, giving evidence to the court that Elbit are guilty – and not the activists standing against them.

    Elbit: complicit in Israel’s current Nakba in Palestine

    The action marked Elbit’s role in the ongoing Nakba and ethnic cleansing of Palestinians, highlighting the 74th year of Zionist colonial occupation since its initial act of forced displacement of 800,000 Indigenous Palestinians from their land:

    The genocidal actions of the Israeli state – armed to the teeth with Elbit weaponry and working hand in hand with Elbit personnel – continue this violent displacement of Palestinians from their native homeland. Since October 2023, these actions, using Elbit drones, munitions, and equipment, have taken over 25,000 lives, and displaced almost two million Palestinians.

    To disrupt British complicity in this ethnic cleansing, the seven Palestine Action activists occupied the headquarters of Elbit Systems UK in Bristol. It is this Bristol HQ from which Elbit oversee the British production of drones, technologies, and other arms eventually shipped to Israel, while profiting from British government contracts and financing Israel’s weapons trade.

    The site was forced closed as activists occupied office and meeting rooms, and dismantled the property inside. Walls were painted and marked with ‘Palestine Action’, ‘Free Palestine’, ‘Shut Elbit Down’, and ‘Elbit=Nakba’ written in Hebrew:

    Palestine Action Elbit action

    Committed to the collective fight

    After the action, all of the activists were remanded to prison. Two of them, both anti-Zionist Jewish activists, were detained for one month, one of the reasons being Israeli embassy involvement in the case due to them having Israeli citizenship. The two were then kept under electronic monitoring for a year, while all seven faced strict bail conditions restricting their movement and communications.

    Despite the state’s harassment, all seven remain committed to the collective fight for Palestinian liberation, and know that the only guilty party in that courtroom is Elbit. Despite the fact that the British criminal justice system has long worked to support these war profiteers, the seven have plead ‘not guilty’ – with their actions deemed urgent and necessary given the Palestinian suffering created by Elbit’s continued operations.

    This trial was due to take place in April 2022, before being postponed to this year. Initially, two others were charged alongside the seven, but their cases have since been separated out.

    Join the seven for their four-week trial at Bristol Crown Court (9 Small St, Bristol BS1 1DB), taking place 8-19 January, before breaking for one week and resuming from 29 January to 9 February.

    Featured image and additional images via Palestine Action

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Bristol’s Broadmead shopping district will see activists host a tour of it – focusing on companies that are complicit in Israel’s ongoing genocide and war crimes in Gaza and the Occupied Territories. Organisers are inviting the public to join them on Saturday 30 December as they visit companies like Barclays and Pret A Manger.

    Bristol: in an alliance with Palestine

    As the Canary previously reported, Bristol Palestine Alliance was formed in response to the horrific events happening in Gaza. Acting as an umbrella group, it brings members from organisations and groups and communities in the city together to respond collectively to organise marches and other events to call for a ceasefire in Gaza and an end to Israel’s brutal occupation of Palestine. It is based on the network of solidarity that has been successfully built in this city over many years.

    Most recently, the group organised a protest outside a Labour Christmas buffet and quiz. In attendance at this party were local Bristol politicians. As the Canary previously wrote, they included:

    Thangam Debbonaire (MP for Bristol West), together with Dan Norris (Labour West of England Mayor), Clare Moody (Labour Police and Crime Commissioner), plus local Labour councillors…

    Local people are shocked that in November their MP Debbonaire, together with the three other Bristol Labour MPs, abstained from the vote for a ceasefire on Gaza. In addition, Dan Norris is known to be a member of “Labour Friends of Israel”.

    Now, Bristol Palestine Alliance is taking its action one step further.

    A walking tour of boycott in Broadmead

    The group has announced a “Boycott Tour of Broadmead” 30 December.

    The event starts at 10.30am at the Podium outside Barclays Bank BS1 3EA in Broadmead and is described as a “tour of stores and businesses people may wish to avoid”. Supporters are asked to bring whistles, drums, musical instruments, and children’s toys to make some noise.

    Organisers say:

    People are utterly horrified at the slaughter being inflicted on the people of Gaza and feel they want to try to stop it. The aim of this tour is to explain how people can help by boycotting Israel products and companies that financially support Israel.

    They go on to say:

    People will be shocked that Barclays Bank invests over a billion pounds in the Israeli Arms Industry! That SodaStream is manufactured in settlements in the West Bank that are illegal under International Law! That Pret A Manger are planning to roll-out new restaurants in the West Bank settlements. That McDonalds and Burger King are supplying take-away dinners to Israeli soldiers killing innocent civilians in Gaza. And that many supermarkets sell products that support the Israeli economy.

    Different group in Bristol have already done protests against specific sites in Bristol including the Arnolfini, AXA, Starbucks, Barclays Bank, Zara, and McDonalds. However, this is the first time all the targets have been joined-up into one tour.

    An ‘educational’ event

    Organisers say:

    Our aim definitely isn’t to disrupt the public. We see this as an educational tour. We aim to inform people how they can avoid supporting the Israel’s war machine with their purses and wallets.

    They go on to say:

    Due to hard work by campaigners over many years there have already been some great successes! Five years ago, HSBC bank dropped over three million pounds worth of shares in Elbit, an Israeli arms company. Plus, they pulled out over eight hundred million pounds from companies that provide technology to the Israeli military, such as Rolls Royce and BAE Systems.

    Elbit Systems is one of Israel’s largest arms manufacturers, notorious for its deadly drones used in attacks on Palestinian civilians and marketed abroad as ‘combat proven’. The company has also manufactured white phosphorous and artillery systems that can be used for cluster munitions.

    BDS for Palestine in Bristol

    Organisers add:

    Just earlier this month PUMA, under relentless pressure from consumers, announced it was ending its sponsorship for the Israel Football Association because it includes teams from the illegal Israeli settlements in the West Bank.”

    People can find out more about the movement for Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) which works to end international support for Israel’s oppression of Palestinians and to apply pressure on Israel to comply with international law. https://bdsmovement.net/

    Organisers also say “there’s even an app people can down-load to their phones called WATERMELON which they can use to check products while they’re shopping”.

    Bristol Palestine Alliance hope to see people at 10:30am on Saturday.

    Featured image via Visit Bristol

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • In a landmark case, eight Palestine Action activists who used direct action to shut down the Israeli weapons trade have been acquitted of a total 12 charges which included criminal damage, burglary and encouraging criminal damage. The trial, which commenced on 13 November, related to a series of actions taken during the first six months of Palestine Action’s existence from July 2020 to January 2021.

    Palestine Action: a landmark legal case

    Richard Barnard, co-founder of Palestine Action, was convicted by a 10-2 majority of one count of criminal damage, for an action at the now-closed Elbit Ferranti factory in Oldham. At least one member of jury later asked if they could change their verdict, but were prohibited from doing so. Lawyers will be considering appealing this conviction.

    The jury failed to reach a majority decision regarding the remaining 23 charges. The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) have until 18 January 2024 to decide if they will retry on those counts due to political pressure. Two of the Elbit Eight, Genevieve Scherer and Jocelyn Cooney, were unanimously acquitted on all charges faced. If the trial returns, the #ElbitEight will instead be the #ElbitSix.

    Exposing Elbit in the dock

    Palestine Action said in a statement:

    This trial has come at a time of intensive state monitoring, harassment, and prosecution of pro-Palestinian voices and actions – with Palestine Action having been operating under the pressure of the state since our inception. Our activists – hundreds of whom have faced arrest across the three years – have been jailed, held on remand, censored (both in the dock and with stringent bail conditions), have had their homes raided and been surveilled.

    Activists have spent time in prison for convictions relating to against weapons and parts manufacturers Teledyne, APPH, and Israeli-owned Rafael, while dozens of others are currently awaiting trial. And we know that there has been Israeli interference in these cases – both through pressure applied by the Embassy onto the attorney general, and through top-level diplomatic meetings between Israeli and British government Ministers.

    The public gallery was full on each day of the trial, with protestors assembled outside and daily mobilisations which saw musicians, choirs, supporters, and unions gather in support of Palestine and Palestine Action, along with visits from Defend Our Juries, and activists including rapper Lowkey and Colm Bryce of the Raytheon 9.

    Palestine Action also offer our thanks and appreciation to CAGE and MPAC for their support throughout the trial. This case was intended to be the Crown’s flagship prosecution to bring down the activists who launched our movement. Having pursued these activists for over three years, and having initially brought draconian, overbearing charges, it will be a disappointing Christmas gift for the prosecutor Sally Hobson.

    Palestine Action will greet a retrial as our activists greet every court appearance: another opportunity to expose Elbit in the dock, to prove to the British public that this company has no place in our country. Keep an eye out for an announcement of a scheduled date for the #ElbitSix trial – along with all upcoming cases.

    Multiple Elbit sites targeted

    The charges related to an occupation of Elbit Systems drone factories in Shenstone and Oldham, actions at its weaponry factory in Kent, Elbit’s London offices, and the offices of Elbit’s landlords, Jones Lang LaSalle. These actions were taken in order to challenge Elbit’s operations and presence in Britain, to prevent their manufacture of weapons bound for Israel.

    The current, unrelenting genocide against Palestinians in Gaza has now martyred over 20,000 Palestinians. Even before the trial commenced, the Eight and all other Palestine Action activists had been vindicated: leaving the court having shown that Elbit is guilty, and that we have a moral and legal obligation to shut them down.

    The Eight had originally been charged with counts including blackmail, conspiracy to commit criminal damage, and burglary.

    The indictment was amended after the commencement of the trial, with the CPS eventually bringing 13 counts against the eight activists: seven counts of damaging property (criminal damage), three counts of burglary with intent to commit criminal damage, one count of possessing articles with intent to damage property, one count of threatening to damage property, and one count of encouraging others to commit the offence of criminal damage.

    The lattermost charge, encouraging others, was introduced as a replacement charge for ‘blackmail’, after Huda Ammori and Barnard discussed direct action on a private Zoom meeting. The jury rejected this accusation.

    Most Palestine Action legal defences ruled out

    Prior to the trial beginning, the judge had ruled out various defences which, Palestine Action maintain, are directly relevant to the actions and the context of Palestine Action more widely.

    The European Convention rights of freedom of expression (Article 10) and freedom of assembly and association (Article 11) were ruled out, on the basis that no protest that includes damage to private property can be considered ‘peaceful’. The defences of necessity and the preservation of life were immediately ruled out, while protection of property was ruled out after evidence was heard.

    The defence argument therefore relied on consent – that, if those who owned the relevant buildings were aware of the heinous crimes which rely on Elbit products for their commission, they would consent to the Eight’s interventions.

    “The duty of people is clear”

    At the start of the trial, the Eight were offered a plea deal, if Ammori and Richard Barnard were to plead guilty, the others would be acquitted. All Eight defendants immediately rejected the deal, and spent the following six weeks in Snaresbrook Crown Court, pleading not guilty to all charges on the basis that Elbit and Israel are the guilty party, not Palestine Action.

    Ammori commented that:

    After pushing back our case for two years, the state have failed again to deter an ever-growing global direct-action movement. Everyday we’ve been on trial, more Palestinians have been massacred using Elbit’s weaponry. The duty of the people is clear – to take all direct action possible to Shut Elbit Down wherever you are. Justice will be complete when Palestine is free.

    Featured image via Palestine Action

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Around the world, the people fighting for the survival of our planet are being shamefully silenced and villified

    Injustice is easy to oppose after it has receded into the past, and there is no cost to imagining yourself as a hero long after the event. Everyone celebrates the suffragettes now, but at the time they were vilified as hateful spinsters and terrorists. McCarthyism is a pejorative political label on right and left alike now, but at his peak, more Americans approved of Senator Joseph McCarthy than frowned on his witch-hunt. Most people would like to believe they’d have stood up against the homophobia of 1980s Britain – yet, by 1987, only 11% of the British public believed same-sex relations to be “not wrong at all”.

    Which takes us to climate activism. This year has seen a global onslaught against people agitating for more action to mitigate the worst effects of the climate crisis. Courts can issue stern judgments, but so can history, and you have to wonder its future verdict on how the persecution and silencing of those raising the alarm only escalated when the scientific evidence had become so cast-iron, and when extreme weather events hammered home the imminent danger facing the human species. Here in Britain, a government which is reneging on its climate commitments – not least by expanding oil and gas licences – is simultaneously introducing repressive legislation to silence those holding them to account.

    Owen Jones is a Guardian columnist

    Continue reading…

    This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.

  • Indigenous campaigners, human rights defenders and climate activists say they are being silenced by fear of reprisals

    Incidents of harassment, surveillance, threats and intimidation are creating a climate of fear at UN events including the recent Cop28 climate conference in Dubai, experts have said.

    Indigenous campaigners, human rights defenders and environmental activists say they are increasingly afraid to speak out on urgent issues because of concerns about reprisals from governments or fossil fuel industries.

    Continue reading…

    This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.

  • On Saturday 16 December, supporters of campaign group Code Rouge-Rood from several European countries entered Lìege Airport in a peaceful direct action to denounce the injustice and climate impact of aviation and demand a drastic reduction of flights.

    Belgium: airports blocked over climate crisis

    This happened just after hundreds of activists were arrested around Antwerp, while preparing to block Antwerp International airport, one of the biggest private jet airports in Belgium. Despite police targetting activists, a large group managed to enter Antwerp Airport and achieved success: no private jets took off from Kortrijk or Antwerp today:

    Ruth Marie, spokesperson for the Code Rouge movement, said:

    Private jets are the pinnacle of climate injustice and there is absolutely no reason for their existence in a climate and cost of living crisis. The frequent flying habits of the super-rich are a huge driver of collapse and the epitome of this injustice: 1% of the global population is responsible for 50% of aviation emissions. It’s time for the super-rich to quit their destructive toys and luxury habits and stop burning up our planet. It’s time to ban private jets.

    At Liège Airport, Europe’s fastest growing cargo airport and the main European logistics hub for e-commerce firm Alibaba, 600 activists prevented planes from unloading the imported cargo onto distribution trucks. They denounced the expansion of the airport and the growth of air freight for mass consumption, with major impacts on health, the local economy, and the climate:

    Leo Tubbax, spokesperson for Stay Grounded, said:

    Liège Airport is the fastest growing cargo airport in Europe and they still want to continue expanding it. This is madness: airport expansion must stop, here and everywhere, and air traffic needs to be drastically reduced, through a process of just transition that prioritises workers’ safety and livelihoods. At the same time, we need to shift towards an economy of short distances that enables the reduction of air freight.

    The protests are part of a mass civil disobedience action announced by Code Rouge targeting the aviation industry. Their demands, include a ban on private jets and short haul flights, the end of subsidies for the aviation sector and its greenwashing, the decrease of air freight and an end to all airport expansion in Belgium – measures that need to be paired with a just transition for workers and wide investment in public and affordable grounded transport:

    Stopping ‘ecocidal enterprises’

    In Mexico, another wave of protests shows a different face of airport conflicts: activists are denouncing the new International Tulum airport, highlighting its connection to military projects and US presence. They condemn the fact that it’s marketed as a ‘green airport’ despite its huge environmental impacts and the way it disregards and jeopardises Mayan people’s interests.

    Angel Sulub, spokesperson for Permanecer en la Tierra, said:

    This airport and connected megaprojects, such as the Tren Maya, are ecocidal enterprises, having led to the cutting of 5.7 million trees. It is increasing the presence of military forces in the region and violates the right to free, prior and informed consent of the Mayan peoples. It illustrates dramatically the scope of neocolonial global injustice that is part of the aviation and tourism sectors and of a world of globalised hypermobility.

    These actions take place days after another UN Climate Change Conference, which world leaders swarmed to on private jets to discuss solutions for the climate crisis. Besides failing, once again, to establish binding commitments to phase out fossil fuels, COP28 continued to leave international aviation emissions out of the agreements, making clear how much a strong climate justice movement is needed to push for real solutions.

    The protests mark the end of a year full of diverse and impactful actions opposing aviation and demanding it’s reduction, particularly around private jets and luxury emissions, entering 2024 with a growing international movement:

    Featured image and additional images via Stay Grounded

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • On Friday 15 December, Palestine protesters unveiled a giant banner and played sounds of bombs exploding outside St Werburghs Community Centre in Bristol. The Community Centre was booked for a Bristol-West Labour Party “Christmas Quiz and Buffet”.

    A quiz for Labour members over Palestine

    Reportedly in attendance were Thangam Debbonaire (MP for Bristol West), together with Dan Norris (Labour West of England Mayor), Clare Moody (Labour Police and Crime Commissioner), plus local Labour councillors.

    The banner read:

    BRISTOL LABOUR QUIZ

    GAZA IS BECOMING A GRAVEYARD FOR CHILDREN

    DO YOU:

    A) VOTE FOR CEASEFIRE?

    B) ABSTAIN FROM VOTING?

    Protest outside a Labour event in Bristol

    Local people are shocked that in November their MP Debbonaire, together with the three other Bristol Labour MPs, abstained from the vote for a ceasefire on Gaza. In addition, Dan Norris is known to be a member of “Labour Friends of Israel”.

    Over the last two months Bristol has come out in force over the shocking death toll and destruction in Gaza.

    Bristol: widespread solidarity with Palestinians

    There have been fortnightly marches through the city with numbers up to ten thousand people attending.

    The Arnolfini, a prestigious arts venue, closed after protests about their decision to cancel a long-established Palestine arts festival.

    There have been school and university strikes, plus pressure on local universities over their links with arms companies. The anti-Zionist Jewish group Na’amod, who hold weekly vigils in the town centre, clashed with the Bristol Mayor.

    Meanwhile, a Bristol City councillor presented a five-thousand signature petition and resigned from the Labour group:

    Plus, campaigners projected a giant Palestine Flag onto the front of Bristol’s City Hall:

    Also on 15 December there were vigils by doctors and other health professionals outside the Bristol Royal Infirmary Hospital, a rally, plus a vigil by journalists and media workers.

    A Gaza-born man in Bristol is on hunger strike and is currently hospitalised.

    On Saturday 16 December there was a fourth local demonstration with people marching through central Bristol and calling out boycott targets – including supermarkets, banks, and Zara in the shopping centre:

    ‘Utterly shameful’

    Rowland Dye of the Bristol Palestine Solidarity Campaign said:

    Bristol has seen repeated marches with thousands showing their shock over the horrific carnage in Gaza.

    As secretary I contacted all four local Labour MPs, plus Marvin the elected Mayor, asking them to speak at our rallies or to send a message. None of them, including Thangham Debbonaire, have ever replied. I’m sure many Bristol people think as I do that’s utterly shameful.

    Another protester, who identifies as a former member on Bristol-West Labour Party, said:

    Tonight they’re enjoying their quiz night and their £15 buffet. Meanwhile people in Gaza have been starved for over two months, have been slaughtered in their thousands, and right now men, women, and children will be lying crushed dying under the rubble of their bombed homes. I’m shocked and tearful at their heartless disregard for humanity being shown by our elected representatives.

    A third protester pointed out that:

    Thousands of Bristol people have been marching through the centre of our city showing their compassion for the people of Palestine. Yet it’s shocking the people we vote for are junketing here then hiding their faces from us.

    Bristol Palestine Alliance was formed in response to the horrific events happening in Gaza. Acting as an umbrella group, it brings members from organisations and groups and communities in the city together to respond collectively to organise marches and other events to call for a ceasefire in Gaza and an end to Israel’s brutal occupation of Palestine. It is based on the network of solidarity that has been successfully built in this city over many years.

    Featured image via Bristol Palestine Alliance

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Just Stop Oil supporters gathered outside Keir Starmer’s house to sing ‘climate-criminal’ Christmas carols. They were demanding that, as the likely leader of the next UK government, Starmer commits to cancelling all new oil and gas licences, including those already greenlit by the current government.

    Silent night, oily night

    At around 8:30pm on Thursday 14 December, a group of nine supporters of Just Stop Oil gathered outside Starmer’s London residence to deliver a letter and to sing re-imagined versions of Christmas carols and popular songs – calling on him to end all new oil, gas, and coal projects in the UK. The supporters could be seen holding signs saying “Revoke Rosebank” and “Arrest the real criminals”:

    Police ordered the group to disperse under Section 42 of the Criminal Justice and Police Act and ordered them to leave the vicinity of the premises for three months or they would be arrested:

    Although Starmer has stated that Labour will end new oil and gas projects in the UK, Labour has so far refused to cancel the new fossil fuel projects approved by Rishi Sunak’s government. This includes Rosebank, a project that is destined to emit more carbon into the atmosphere than 28 whole countries combined.

    The carolers delivered a letter to Starmer which can be read here. Part of it stated:

    You appear to have wavered in your commitment to show real leadership on this issue. Your refusal to cancel the new oil and gas licences that are being approved by the current government… is nothing short of a crime against humanity…

    How do you want to be remembered Keir? As the ghost of Christmas past? Or as the man who gave us a future? It’s time for action, not words.

    Starmer: complicit in another crime against humanity

    One of those serenading Starmer was Rory from London, who works as a secondary school teacher. He said:

    Beyond the culture wars and political point scoring, our world is at a crisis point. Our homes and our families are under threat. Our political system is failing us. At a time where bold leadership is required to deal with the multiple crises we face, Labour are promising more of the same.

    Failing to revoke new oil licences would be tantamount to ‘rubber-stamping’ the last ditch, ‘slash and burn’ actions of the current Tory leadership, who are hell-bent on enriching themselves and those they serve in the oil and gas lobby. This complicity is nothing short of a crime against humanity.

    Another of those ‘singing for Starmer’ is Rosie, who works as an editor. She said:

    Starmer knows he needs to do the right thing for his children, and that is to cancel all new oil and gas licences if he gets to number 10. He is a former human rights lawyer, he should know the difference between right and wrong.

    History will not be kind to those who knew how bad the situation was with the climate, but allowed the extremists in the Tory party and oil lobby to destroy everything for their own selfish enrichment- killing millions in the process. The Tories have no mandate to issue these licences, and as PM, Starmer’s obligation is to serve the public who want action on the climate crisis now.

    Governments are the real criminals

    There have been 670 arrests of Just Stop Oil supporters since 30 October. There are currently three Just Stop Oil supporters in prison, two of which have been imprisoned for peacefully marching in the road. They join Marcus Decker, who has been imprisoned for over a year of his two years seven months sentence. Fourteen Just Stop Oil supporters are currently under electronic tag surveillance.

    Just Stop Oil said:

    Continued expansion of new oil and gas will bring about the wholesale destruction of ordered society and an end to the rule of law. We are not prepared to watch while the government continues to serve the interests of a few, at the expense of everyone else. It’s up to all of us to come together and resist. It is the will of the overwhelming majority of people that we take the actions necessary to ensure our survival and together we can make it happen.

    Our government are the real criminals – imprisoning peaceful people for taking proportionate action to protect their communities, whilst licensing more than 100 new oil and gas projects, which will destroy everything we value. We’re coming together to demand an end to new oil and gas. It’s not a case of ‘if’ we will win; but ‘when’.

    Featured image via Just Stop Oil

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Cardiff Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC) is ramping up its campaign to boycott Israel this weekend with a march and rally on Saturday 16 December. This comes in the aftermath of the third biggest sportswear brand worldwide, PUMA, dropping its sponsorship of the Israel Football Association following pressure from campaigners over the years.

    Puma: finally ditching Israeli football

    Following years of campaigning by the Palestinian-led Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) Movement, global sports brand PUMA has been forced to end its sponsorship of the Israel Football Association (IFA). The IFA includes football clubs in illegal Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory. Israeli settlements are built on land stolen from Palestinians, and are considered war crimes under international law.

    First agreed in 2018, PUMA’s decision to sponsor the IFA has been meet with widespread criticism. Over 200 Palestinian sports teams have called on PUMA to end its sponsorship, describing how its “sponsorship of the IFA legitimises and gives international cover to Israel’s illegal settlements” and helps “whitewash Israel’s human rights abuses” including its routine violence against Palestinian footballers.

    Israel’s current bombardment of Gaza has killed more than 18,000 Palestinians, including thousands of children. The global outcry over the indiscriminate killing of civilians and attacks on infrastructure including hospitals has put unprecedented pressure on corporations associated with Israel’s violations of international law, including its illegal settlements in the occupied West Bank.

    PUMA has lost millions of pounds in lucrative contracts because of pressure applied by the campaign. PSC branches have been part of this sustained campaign, organising regular pickets, protests and vigils for several years outside PUMA stores and at PUMA events all over the UK.

    ‘Unprecedented violence’

    Ben Jamal, PSC Director, said:

    Palestinians are currently facing unprecedented violence at the hands of the Israeli military. As the world calls for a permanent ceasefire, corporations continue to profit from the killing and destruction. We need to end this complicity.

    PUMA’s decision is an important victory that shows the power of the solidarity movement. We’ve sent all corporations a powerful message: if you choose to be complicit in Israeli apartheid, you will face the strength of the solidarity movement. We will continue to grow our BDS campaigns against banks like Barclays and corporations like JCB, who are complicit in Israel’s system of apartheid.

    Veteran campaigner and Wales-based Honorary President of PSC, Betty Hunter, said:

    After five years, PUMA bowing to relentless pressure shows boycott campaigning can work. We won’t be satisfied until others still trading with Israel also decide to join us in isolating apartheid Israel, however.

    Cardiff: demanding more BDS for Palestine

    So, campaigners will be back on the streets of Cardiff this on 16 December with three calls:

    • An Israeli ceasefire in Gaza
    • Supermarkets not to stock Israeli goods
    • Disinvestment from arms companies by Barclays Bank, a major supporter of the arms trade with Israel.

    The march will assemble at the Nye Bevan statue, Queen Street, at 12pm followed by a rally at Cardiff Library, where Palestinian speakers will relate the horror of life in Gaza under Israeli occupation and bombing.

    Cardiff PSC actions will be in alliance with the Muslim Council for Wales, Black Lives Matter, Palestine Social Club, Stop the War, and Syrian Welsh Society. They will be mirrored by protests across Wales.

    Events are happening very frequently all over Wales. You may find it useful to join the Facebook group here.

    Featured image via PSC

    By Steve Topple

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Black athletes have not only changed how the game of soccer is played; around the world, they’ve also harnessed their positions to fight for justice and political change through the sport of soccer itself. In the latest “Ask a Sports Scholar” segment, Edge of Sports host Dave Zirin speaks with Dr. Jermaine Scott about his forthcoming book Black Soccer: Football and Politics in the African Diaspora, and about the reality of teaching about race, culture, and politics at a public university in Ron DeSantis’s Florida.

    Dr. Jermaine Scott teaches courses on African American and African Diaspora History and Sports History at Florida Atlantic University. He is currently working on a forthcoming book called Black Soccer: Football and Politics in the African Diaspora.

    Studio Production: David Hebden
    Post-Production: Taylor Hebden
    Audio Post-Production: David Hebden
    Opening Sequence: Cameron Granadino
    Music by: Eze Jackson & Carlos Guillen


    Transcript

    Dave Zirin:  Welcome to Edge of Sports, only on The Real News Network. I’m Dave Zirin.

    It’s time to Ask a Sports Scholar, one of the most popular things we do on Edge of Sports. Today we are going to talk to Jermaine Scott, who teaches African-American and sports history at Florida Atlantic University. He’s currently working on a book called Black Soccer: Football and Politics in the African Diaspora. Let’s bring him on. 

    Professor Scott, thank you so much for joining us here on Edge of Sports.

    Jermaine Scott:  Hey, thank you so much for the invitation. I’m really excited to be here.

    Dave Zirin:  I love the background. I feel like I’m in a David Lynch movie with all that red, it’s awesome.

    Jermaine Scott:  Yeah, we try to keep the colors a little fresh throughout the house, so.

    Dave Zirin:  It’s very cool. Very cool.

    I want to ask you so much about Black soccer, what it is, what it means, how you got into that as an area of study. But I can’t talk to somebody from Florida Atlantic University without first asking them about teaching at the university level, particularly at a public university in Florida at this day and time in 2023. What is that experience like for you?

    Jermaine Scott:  That’s a fascinating question, Dave, and it’s a question that I think about often these days, obviously. It’s a lot of anxiety if I’m being completely honest. You walk into the classroom and you don’t know what a student might say. You don’t know how a student might interpret what you’re saying. So there’s a lot of anxiety about how you’re teaching and how you’re expected to relay historical facts.

    And I teach African-American history, I teach African diaspora history, and sports history. And all three of those courses — I teach other courses, but the core of my courses has to do with issues of race, with inequality, with histories of colonialism and slavery. And so these are all topics that are heavily contested right now in the state of Florida.

    So yeah, there’s a lot of anxiety but there’s also a lot of support within my department, other colleagues throughout the department, but also throughout the university, and throughout the university system in Florida. There seems to be a strong cohort of professors that are there for each other, and are essentially trying to build community.

    Dave Zirin:  But as somebody who’s been teaching in Florida for a few years, you can tell our audience the vibe is different now than perhaps it was a few years ago.

    Jermaine Scott:  Absolutely. I first got to FAU in the middle of COVID, 2020. So my first year was all virtual. The second year was okay. We started hearing things in the background. And then in the middle of my second year, third year, things started to come in really quickly.

    And yeah, again, my first and second year felt pretty free. I felt able to express myself the way I wanted to in class. And I still do, but I have this haunting sensation in the back of my head. If I start to get riled up a little bit, I have to reel it back in and make sure I don’t go off the rails too much. But yeah, so I think there’s ways of navigating it, and I think I’m doing okay doing that, but you just never know. Each semester is a new group of students, and you just never know in this political climate how they’re going to receive what you’re saying.

    Dave Zirin:  Absolutely. So let’s get to the fun stuff here. Black soccer, what does that mean, Black soccer? How do you define it? And I’m sure you define it more than “Black people playing soccer.”

    Jermaine Scott:  And that’s exactly how I wanted to start it. When we think of ideas like Black music or the Black church — And this is how I walk through it with my class, it’s like, are we just talking about Black people playing music? Are we just talking about Black people going to church? And that’s part of it, but there’s also something more substantial about it.

    And so what I’m trying to do is conceptualize this idea called Black soccer, and it’s to look at the ways in which Black footballers, Black soccer players, have used the game as a site of political articulation, have turned the game into a space to articulate their politics.

    And at the root of all of these chapters, which at the time seemed very all over the place, they’re in DC, they’re in São Paulo, they’re in Amsterdam, at the root of all the chapters is an effort for these Black footballers to reimagine or renegotiate their relationship to the nation as international footballers, as footballers that are in highly nationalized politicized spaces, national narratives shape a lot of their careers or shape the political context of the game in these different spaces.

    In São Paulo, for example, in the 1980s, Brazil is still under a military dictatorship, and that shapes the way in which clubs operate. While in Corinthians, in São Paulo, a club called Corinthians, about the midfielder Socrates, they had what they called a Corinthians democracy, which is where they democratize the entire club, where every player of the club, every staff member of the club, every coach had an equal vote on all the decisions of the club. This is in the context of a national narrative of the military dictatorship.

    Or in the Netherlands during the 1990s, the national narrative is multiculturalism. We have all these different races, and we can all live together.

    You have Black players on the Dutch national team who are of Surinamese descent. And they are asking questions about their treatment on the team, about how they are being portrayed in the media, and it starts to add wrinkles to these smooth, progressive, national narratives of cohesion.

    And so in each chapter, I’m looking at how Black footballers are using the game to kind of critique — Or how I like to put it, play within and against the nation.

    Dave Zirin:  Interesting to speak about it relative to the nation. We interviewed another sports scholar, Theresa Runstedtler, who wrote a book called Black Ball, and it was about the way Black people affected the very style of the game in the 1970s in a way that goes often quite uncredited.

    Jermaine Scott:  Yes.

    Dave Zirin:  Can we talk about that? Does that exist? Because soccer is a game of so much more structure than, say, basketball. Do you see a difference historically in how the style of the sport changed by the infusion of the Black athlete?

    Jermaine Scott:  Absolutely. And we can find this most noticeably in places in Latin America, in places like Brazil, places like Colombia, even in places like Argentina — Not necessarily the integration of Black players, but the integration of the working class, the working poor in Argentina. They all had a massive effect on the style of the game.

    So when the game is originated, it’s coming out of Europe, it’s coming out of England. The institutionalization of the sport happens at the end of the 19th century, and it’s a very rigid game. You have your defense, you have your midfielder, and you have your attack. And in the European game, it was a lot of running. You kick the ball and you chase the ball. It was very physical, man-to-man, pushing people out the way.

    In Latin America, when it was adopted by Black players, when it was adopted by the working classes, it became a much more free sport. So here we have the focus on the individual, where the players are not necessarily interested in these long passes, but they’re interested in expressing themselves individually with the ball. That might look like what we call in Brazil, the [inaudible]. The movement of Capoeira, of the capoeiristas. We see the same movement within Brazilian football.

    Peter Alegi talks about the Africanization of football, of course, in the continent of Africa, and how working class Black players, particularly in places like South Africa, adopted the game and made it their own. Not only their style of play, but also their participation, let’s say, in the stands. So how the supporters are also participating in the match is different in the ways in which the Eurocentric, European ways in which the game was created.

    Dave Zirin:  Wow, this is fascinating stuff. What attracted you to this area of study?

    Jermaine Scott:  So I was born in Florida, born in West Palm Beach, Florida, and I was born to Jamaican parents. And so football in Jamaica is the number one sport, probably next to cricket. But probably football is the number one sport. So I always grew up playing soccer, I always grew up playing football. I played it through high school. I didn’t play in college, but soccer was always central in the household.

    And it was also the first space that I began to ask questions about race. A lot of my team, I was one of two, maybe one of three Black players on the team, and I always wondered why that was. Why aren’t there more Black players on these teams? But then I would watch the World Cup and I would see the Colombian National team, and it was all Black players. The first World Cup I remember is the 1998 World Cup, and I remember watching the Dutch National team, and it just had a number of Black players. And in my young mind, I wasn’t associating Blackness with the Netherlands. I wasn’t associating Blackness with Colombia or Venezuela or even Brazil.

    And so seeing that, I had this tension. Why am I the only Black player on my team in the States but then when I look throughout the world, I see Black people playing the game all over? And so it became a space where I started to ask these questions about race, about identity. And I had the opportunity to study it as a critical practice, as a critical exercise to think about the political implications of the game. Obviously, joining this long tradition of scholarship that looks at how, of course, sports is deeply, deeply politicized.

    Dave Zirin:  Interesting. So it captured you intellectually through playing and through asking questions about playing.

    Jermaine Scott:  Absolutely, yeah.

    Dave Zirin:  And did you know going in as an undergrad that this was something you wanted to explore? Or was it that you started to look at sports and society and then thought, hey, when I was in high school, I used to think about this stuff a lot?

    Jermaine Scott:  Yeah, more the latter. I went into undergrad just doing African-American history. That was my focus. And then I actually went to grad school. Actually my first year in grad school, I was looking at a completely different topic. I was actually looking at Black labor movements in New York during the interwar period. But for some reason, sports and politics was just always at the forefront of my mind.

    And I remember my cousin, actually, who’s from Trinidad, gave me Beyond a Boundary by C.L.R. James. And this is when I was in middle school. I didn’t know who C.L.R. James was. I didn’t know what Beyond a Boundary was. But I read it and it intrigued me. But again, in middle school, I didn’t really understand the significance of what I was reading. And then of course, in grad school, Beyond a Boundary is the seminal text when thinking about this relationship between sports and politics and culture and society.

    Dave Zirin:  I don’t know. Not a lot of middle schoolers are given gifts that are books by Black Trotskyists. It’s very…

    Jermaine Scott:  It’s fascinating. And I had no idea at the time. I’m like, okay, C.L.R James, whatever.

    Dave Zirin:  That’s a special gift at that age. Much credit and love.

    Jermaine Scott:  Yeah, shout out to my cousin Robbie.

    Dave Zirin:  Yeah, shout out indeed. Okay.

    So other than Pelé, who is completely obvious, who are the Black soccer players in your mind who truly change the game? Who should people be aware of?

    Jermaine Scott:  Wow. I definitely think people that have changed the game, we definitely have to think about, of course, Pelé. There’s also a Portuguese player by the name of Eusébio who really showed his true quality in the 1966 World Cup in England. That’s a player that’s of incredible import.

    But also players from the African continent. Players like Didier Drogba, who played for Chelsea, from the Ivory Coast, who changed the way we watch attacking players. Not only his strength, but his grace. He’s one of those players that finds a really special balance between power but also grace, graceful movements on the pitch. So Didier Drogba is one. Wow, there’s so many. There’s a number from Brazil: Ronaldo, Ronaldinho. And I’m saying all these players, and they all have controversial political backgrounds, but I guess that’s the nature of the work. So there’s a number of players. Wow.

    Some of the players that I look at in my own work from the Netherlands, we can think of players like Clarence Seedorf, Edgar Davids. These are players from the 1990s that added a new dimension to the Dutch style of game. At times, they were criticized for it. At times they were criticized for playing too hard, which is kind of nuts to think about it at the time. You criticizing me for playing too hard? So there’s all these different ways. But in the Netherlands, there are a number of different players that had instrumental impacts on the game and how they shaped this instrumental style of Dutch football, which is called Total Football. And so I try to argue in the book that these players added a specific wrinkle to the game, to the style of the game.

    Dave Zirin:  I’m just going to name a player and you tell me their importance. Or maybe you think, yeah, that’s not somebody I’m looking at. Does this player matter, and why do they matter? I just have two on my head, two that you just named a lot of the people that I wanted to ask you about. But let me ask you: Mario Balotelli.

    Jermaine Scott:  Yeah, I love Mario Balotelli.

    Dave Zirin:  He matters, though. I know you love him as a player, but he matters to your area of study? He’s part of that continuum?

    Jermaine Scott:  Well, yes. I don’t talk about him specifically within the chapters but he’s definitely a part of that tradition. When thinking about critiquing particularly the media and their portrayal of him. The classic visual I have of Mario Balotelli is when he’s playing for Manchester City, he scores the goal and he lifts up his shirt and it says, why always me? Why is he always the center of these attacks? When the team is doing bad, why is it always Mario Balotelli’s fault? And so Mario Balotelli has a fascinating career. He’s also one of a few, few Black players on the Italian national team. We rarely see Black players on the Italian national team. And that added to his contentious relationship with the nation.

    Dave Zirin:  Okay. Mbappé.

    Jermaine Scott:  The Wonderkid, the Wonderkid.

    Dave Zirin:  Does he matter to this continuum?

    Jermaine Scott:  He does. He does. A lot of people praise Mbappé, of course, for his quality on the pitch, his goal scoring ability. But he also has a political side. I believe it was the 2018 World Cup where feminist protesters invaded the pitch. And he’s like, cool. He’s like, let’s take pictures. And he’s expressed his independence as a player. And as Black athletes, when you articulate your independence as a player, the media is going to lash out at you. And so he has the courage to do that as a Black footballer in Europe. And of course, his quality allows him to do the things that he’s able to do. I think his quality also protects him in a lot of ways as well.

    Dave Zirin:  And last one: Marcus Rashford.

    Jermaine Scott:  Marcus Rashford, just brilliant player on the pitch. His community work in England is unmatched. Again, just a top-notch player. There’s certain players that I sometimes grapple with. I think we can do this with all athletes. Sometimes there’s a desire to want more radical politics. That’s not to say he doesn’t have a radical politics. I’m not necessarily sure how radical his politics are. But from the work that he’s done within the community, it shows that he obviously sees his importance outside of the pitch. And that’s critical for Black players.

    Dave Zirin:  Yeah, and his work on child hunger during COVID.

    Jermaine Scott:  Absolutely.

    Dave Zirin:  It’s one of the most impactful moments an athlete can have.

    Jermaine Scott:  Absolutely.

    Dave Zirin:  I don’t even think he realized the impact he was going to have. Forcing Boris Johnson to do a massive, massive change in terms of feeding kids during the desperate time. Incredible.

    Jermaine Scott:  Absolutely, yeah. And it’s just a testament to how footballers are able to use the game or use their platform to make these kinds of national changes.

    Dave Zirin:  Well, you’ve been so generous with your time, Professor Scott. Is there anything we’re missing about your area of study and work that you’d like to share with our audience?

    Jermaine Scott:  No, I think we covered it. I think the main argument that I’m really trying to drive home is that soccer allows players, allows Black footballers, allows Black soccer supporters, allows Black people to renegotiate their relationship to the nation.

    I’m writing in this tradition of a political theorist named Richard [inaudible] who critiques the nation state as an anti-Black formation. And so what does that mean for Black citizenship? What does that mean for Black nationality? And he tries to wrestle with that. He tries to say, well, what if it’s okay to question nationality? What if it’s okay to not have a nationality or to live in this in-between space? And I think soccer provides a good vehicle to do that.

    Dave Zirin:  Definitely. Definitely. The book is called Black Soccer: Football and Politics in the African Diaspora. I cannot wait to read it. I’m sure our audience feels the same way. Professor Scott, thank you so much for joining us here on Edge of Sports.

    Jermaine Scott:  Dave, thank you so much for having me. Appreciate it.

    This post was originally published on The Real News Network.