Category: Protest

  • Over the last few months, Tanisha Burton has developed respiratory issues for the first time in her life. Her shortness of breath landed her in the emergency room in April, where she was prescribed an Albuterol inhaler to manage the problem. Burton lives on Beniteau Street, located in southeast Detroit. Outside her back door is the recently expanded Detroit Assembly Complex — a massive auto-manufacturing facility consisting of two assembly lines pumping out Jeep Grand Cherokees and Dodge Durangos. 

    Burton says the onset of her respiratory issues coincided with the start of construction to expand the plant, which includes the first new auto assembly line in Detroit in 30 years. 

    Respiratory issues aren’t the only thing that has changed in Burton’s life during the expansion. An insurance appraiser recently pointed out that the foundation of her home had moved, likely due to the vibrations and shaking produced by the nearby facility. There’s also a constant foul smell, she said, and noise that wakes her up at all hours of the night. It is almost like “you can smell the pollution in the air,” Burton said, “and I hate waking up at three, four in the morning because I hear all this banging.” 

    The new and expanded auto assembly lines belong to Stellantis, the fourth-largest automaker in the world, created from the merger of Fiat Chrysler Automobiles (FCA) and Peugeot-maker PSA Group earlier this year. For some Detroiters, the new facility has been a source of excitement and hope. Detroit became known as the “Motor City” because of it’s thriving car-making scene — General Motors, Ford Motor Company, and Fiat Chrysler Automobiles were all founded in Detroit. But in recent years, some have questioned whether Detroit is still the heart of the automobile industry in the United States, thanks to the sharp decline in manufacturing jobs. Between 2001 and 2017, auto-manufacturing jobs in Metro Detroit declined by 38 percent. The expansion of Stellantis’ facility is estimated to bring 5,000 of those jobs back. 

    Aerial view of Stellantis's Mack Avenue Assembly Complex
    Aerial view of Stellantis’s Mack Avenue Assembly Complex in Detroit. Stellantis

    But there is one major hitch: The complex sits within a low-income and majority Black community in southeast Detroit that is already plagued by pollution from nearby industry, including a General Motors assembly plant, two metal processors, and two major highways that run through the area. 

    As part of the approval for the expansion of the Detroit Assembly Complex, FCA, and later Stellantis, had to ensure it wasn’t increasing its overall emissions in the area. Southeast Michigan is already a nonattainment region for ozone levels, regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency. Because of this, no additional activities that produce ozone are allowed. So, in order to expand its Detroit facility on the east side, Stellantis agreed to reduce emissions from its existing plant in Warren, a mostly white, higher income city. Stellantis will reduce emissions in Warren by 10 percent, plus the amount the expanded Detroit facility will produce. 

    Activists argue Stellantis’ decision is a clear example of environmental racism — the company chose to reduce harmful air pollutant emissions in a mostly white neighborhood in Warren so that it could increase them in a majority Black neighborhood in Detroit.

    “We’ve bailed out FCA multiple times,” Eden Bloom, an organizer for the advocacy group Detroit People’s Platform and a resident in the neighborhood surrounding the assembly complex, told Grist. “And here we are on the eastside of Detroit, giving them another almost half-a-billion dollars for a plant that is in the middle of a high-poverty, high-asthma, 90 percent-Black neighborhood.” 

    The asthma rate in the neighborhood around the Detroit Assembly Complex is currently three times higher than the state average, and twice as high as Detroit’s. Ozone is a major trigger for asthma attacks and respiratory illness. On June 6, the area had its third ozone action alert this year, which means levels are so high that residents should avoid certain activities and stay inside if they already have a respiratory illness that makes it difficult to breathe. 

    Activists gather to protest Stellantis’ new manufacturing plant in Detroit on June 3. Courtesy of Detroit People’s Platform

    In early June, community organizers and protestors crashed a Stellantis event in Detroit meant to kick off the company’s green initiatives, including its $1 million commitment toward making the eastside neighborhood the greenest in the city and, according to a Stellantis representative, making one of the Detroit Assembly Complex’s facilities the lowest volatile organic compound-emitting plant in the country. In total, Stellantis has committed around $30 million for community benefits, from the construction of a new stormwater park, to tree planting initiatives, to funding a manufacturing career center at the local high school. The company, however, will receive much more than that in tax credits from the state for the expansion project — more than $400 million

    Protestors, organizers, and residents all say Stellantis’ green initiatives aren’t enough to make up for the noise, odor, and air pollution that will impact the daily lives and health of the surrounding community. 

    “The community return on investment is really low. It’s an insult,” said Bloom. “And then to do these grandiose gestures and have a press conference and say you’re the greenest thing in southeastern Michigan is just laughable.” 

    “I’m beyond disappointed with all of this,” local resident Robert Shobe told Planet Detroit, a local news outlet. “I think it’s wrong for them to take our tax dollars to kill us.”

    Stellantis is required by state and federal regulation to show that it is in compliance with emissions limits of pollutants at all of its factories, including for volatile organic compounds, or VOCs, particulate matter, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen dioxide. But that compliance is self-reported, which has residents concerned given that FCA, before joining with Stellantis, previously lied about its emissions. In 2019, the company was sued by federal regulators for tampering with technology to produce lower emission results, culminating in an $800 million settlement. FCA was also recently found guilty of bribing union leaders, resulting in a $30 million dollar settlement. 

    Community members and environmental activists from Detroit have largely been against the project since it was first announced in 2019, voicing concerns at public comment hearings and protesting. Despite these actions, the Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy, or EGLE, granted the facility the permits needed to expand starting in 2020. 

    A spokesperson for Stellantis defended the decision to reduce emissions at its Warren Truck Assembly Plant while increasing them at the Detroit complex, telling Grist that federal regulations do not require projects to be located at a specific spot within a nonattainment region. The spokesperson also pointed to the company’s green investments and initiatives in the eastside neighborhood, which include home repair grants, an ambient air quality monitoring station, and giving money to the Chandler Park Conservancy. “We are pleased that EGLE has evaluated the Detroit Assembly Complex — the Mack and Jefferson projects — and found that the plants meet air quality rules and regulations,” Kaileen Connelly, the head of Stellantis’ global content hub, told Grist. 

    Media officer Nick Assendelft of EGLE told Grist that modifications were made to the Warren Truck plant instead of the Detroit facility because Warren Truck has historically had higher annual emissions of VOCs compared to the Detroit plant, which installed pollution control technology 10 years ago. But Macomb County, where Warren is located, has close to half the amount of hospitalizations and deaths caused by asthma than Wayne County, where Detroit is located. “Installation of additional control equipment at Jefferson North [in Detroit] would not have created enough offsets; therefore, FCA/Stellantis proposed to install control equipment at Warren Truck,” Assendelft told Grist. 

    A 2021 Jeep Grand Cherokee goes through assembly at the Stellantis Detroit Assembly Complex
    Bill Pugliano / Getty Images

    As a part of the community benefits agreement between FCA, now Stellantis, and Detroit, each house in the areas surrounding the manufacturing facility is eligible for $15,000 for home improvements such as sealing up windows, installing air conditioning, and in some cases fixing roofs — measures that can help keep air pollution out of people’s homes. But residents say the money isn’t sufficient to protect them from the impacts of increased emissions from the plants. “It’s not enough to seal up the house and make it safe,” said Bloom of Detroit People’s Platform. 

    Burton said there were restrictions on the money that Stellantis gave residents, and she wasn’t able to make all the repairs she needed to. “You could only use their [city-approved] contractors, you couldn’t use anybody else,” Burton said. “The bids were so high.” With the $15,000 she was given, she fixed her roof, but was unable to also fix her foundation, replace her windows, and soundproof her house. 

    Some community leaders have proposed that Stellantis use a powder-based paint on the automobiles it is manufacturing, which would help reduce VOC emissions from the Detroit facility. But in response to a public comment, EGLE argued that a powder paint would result in quality differences on the vehicle and would require a complete redesign, which would be cost prohibitive. 

    Bloom said, “It all comes down to the bottom line. And in order for them to implement the right machinery, the proper equipment, and anything else that they would need to reduce those emissions further would shift their bottom line — their profit margins.” 

    Burton said Stellantis, “wants to show this [facility] off to the world, but they’re not including the residents,” such as valuing their opinions. “We’re appreciative of what they did offer us, but we need help in other areas and they should make sure we are safe across the board.”

    This story was originally published by Grist with the headline Detroit’s first new assembly line in 30 years will compound pollution in Black neighborhoods on Jun 17, 2021.

    This post was originally published on Grist.

  • RNZ Pacific

    Today marks 50 years to the day that six Pacific Islanders grouped together in central Auckland to form the Polynesian Panther Party.

    The party was founded on 16 June 1971 by members Will ‘Ilolahia, Fred Schmidt, Nooroa Teavae, Paul Dapp, Eddie Williams and Vaughan Sanft. They were later joined by Tigilau Ness, Lupematasila Misatauveve Melani Anae and Alec Toleafoa.

    They took inspiration from the United States civil rights movement Black Panthers during a period of police brutality against the African American population.

    Similar scenes of racial unrest occurred in Aotearoa, and long before the infamous Dawn Raids too. In the early 1870s, an Evening Post article said: “Bad as the Chinese are, the South Sea savages are worse, and any extensive importation of them would have a most pernicious effect.”

    Polynesian Panthers
    Polynesian Panthers … inspired by the US civil rights movement Black Panthers during a period of police brutality against the African American population. Image: RNZ/Facebook

    New Zealand faced major economic troubles almost a century on from that report, and Pasifika immigrants brought under the allure of jobs in industrial labour were resorted to as the scapegoat.

    “It was a time of revolution,” Associate Professor Lupematasila Misatauveve Dr Melani Anae told RNZ’s Untold Pacific History.

    Dr Melani Anae
    Dr Melani Anae talks about the Dawn Raids period in NZ’s history. Image: RNZ/Tikilounge Productions

    “To heck with authority, to heck with conservatism, to heck with the Vietnam War, that was the kind of climate we were growing up in,” she said.

    “We delivered the West End newspaper around Ponsonby and Herne Bay to get money to pay for the office. The work we did as the Polynesian Panthers was conscientising, it was making people aware of who we were.”

    Musician Tigilau Ness recalls that they were criticised for “hating white people”.

    Tigilau Ness
    Tigilau Ness discusses his involvement during the Dawn Raids protests in New Zealand. Image: RNZ/Tikilounge Productions

    “We had to put up with that kind of stigma as well, not only from the Europeans, the white people, but from our own people. ‘Why you do this to the Palagi? Why you go fight the police?’,” he said.

    The Panthers insisted on peaceful strike and protest action, as opposed to their US counterparts.

    They drove in supporters’ vehicles and “dawn raided” the homes of politicians by shining torches and yelling through loudspeakers, to prove why their work was necessary.

    Legal rights pamphlets were distributed, homework centres were held in church halls and food co-ops were run. They also provided free transportation for the families of prison inmates who wanted to visit them, and on release free accommodation would be offered.

    Fifty years on, the Panthers have concluded a tour of schools and Pasifika communities in Wellington, intending to share the story of the ‘Claw’ to the next generation.

     

    The Polynesian Panther Party will hold a three-day fonotaga commemoration event this weekend at the University of Auckland’s Fale Pasifika.

    Whakaako kia Whakaora - Educate to Liberate
    Whakaako kia Whakaora – Educate to Liberate. Image: RNZ/Polynesian Panthers

    Dawn Raid apology
    The Panthers’ golden jubilee couldn’t be more forthcoming, given an announcement made this week of a formal government apology for the 1970s Dawn Raids.

    Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern said the time had come for an apology for a Labour Party immigration policy that targeted Pasifika people who had overstayed their visas by mere fact of their ethnicity.

    Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern
    Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern … “To this day Pacific communities face prejudices and stereotypes … an apology can never reduce what happened.” Image: Dom Thomas/RNZ

    “To this day Pacific communities face prejudices and stereotypes… an apology can never reduce what happened, or undo the decades of disadvantage experienced as a result, but it can contribute to healing for Pacific peoples,” she said.

    Ardern was joined at the theatrette lecturn by Pacific Peoples Minister ‘Aupito Toeolesulusulu Tofae Su’a William Sio, who wiped away tears while sharing his own personal story of being raided as a teenager.

    “I’m quite emotional… I’m trying to control my emotions today,” he said.

    His parents had only just bought a home, taken as an achievement for the family, when a year or two later they’d been woken up to a police officer flashing a torch in their eyes.

    “To have somebody knocking at the door in the early hours of the morning with a flashlight in your face, disrespecting the owner of the home, with an Alsatian dog frothing at the mouth,” ‘Aupito recounted.

    'Aupito William Sio
    ‘Aupito William Sio … “I don’t think there is any Pacific family who was not impacted on by the events of the Dawn Raids.” Image: Dom Thomas/RNZ

    “The memories are etched in my memory of my father being helpless.

    “I don’t think there is any Pacific family who was not impacted on by the events of the Dawn Raids, and there is a strong moral imperative to acknowledge those past actions were wrong. Through an apology, they recognise those actions were unacceptable under the universal declaration of human rights, and are absolutely intolerable within today’s human rights protections.

    “Come for the ceremony,” ‘Aupito said, welcoming the Panthers to the government apology.

    Ardern added “[the Panthers] will probably remind us to ‘educate to liberate’.”

    The Prime Minister will make her formal government apology for the Dawn Raids on June 26 at the Auckland Town Hall, 50 years on from the start of the revolution against racial injustices against Pasifika in Aotearoa.

    This article is republished under a community partnership agreement with RNZ.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • The G7 summit has ended in Cornwall. It is, of course, no surprise that as the world’s richest leaders cosied up together, they achieved absolutely nothing.

    Charities and NGOs are expressing their deep disappointment that Johnson, Biden, Merkel and others didn’t deliver on either their plans to vaccinate the world, or to stop the planet from burning. But really, what did we expect? Do we learn nothing, year after year? When will we actually realise that the richest countries won’t ever let go of their wealth, or their grip on power? That their deals mean nothing, and their words are empty?

    The G7 summit was protected by more than 6,000 police, and created severe disruption for locals. The skies were filled with terrifying Chinook helicopters and drones, while the red arrows shot through the air to massage the macho egos of the world leaders. Meanwhile, the tranquil Cornish coast was littered with police and military vessels.

    While more than 15 million people in the country live in poverty, the UK spent more than £70 million on policing alone for the three-day summit.

    Internationalist resistance

    But each time summits are held, whether it’s the G7, G20, NATO or COP, they do unwittingly achieve one thing. And that is the coming together of activists to resist them. It is at protest camps where connections are made, bonds are strengthened, and where we get the courage and will to fight for a world beyond capitalism.

    This G7 was no different. From anarchists to XR, activists descended on Cornwall in their droves and occupied three different protest camps for three days of protest. Because of Covid, there weren’t the usual numbers joining us from mainland Europe. But this year, Kashmiri, Palestinian and Tigray communities travelled from all over the UK to make their voices heard, making it possibly the most internationalist resistance we have ever seen in this country. Others spoke about revolutionary resistance in Kurdistan, and the war on Yemen.

     

    Kashmiri and Palestinian activists
    Kashmiri and Palestinian activists gather to resist the G7 on 12 June

     

    Kashmiri and Palestinian activists resist the G7
    Kashmiri and Palestinian activists gather to resist the G7 on 12 June

     

    Kurdistan solidarity activist resists the G7
    A Kurdistan solidarity activist protests the G7’s support for the Turkish state

     

    One Kashmiri activist told the crowd:

    Who supplies the arms to Israel? America, Britain, which kill innocent people in Palestine. Many British supplies are armed to India, which kills people in Kashmir. France supplies arms to India, which kill people in Kashmir. In Kashmir, we have 900,000 Indian soldiers. They’ve been occupying Kashmir since 1947. This is a British legacy. Britain left us under occupation. We said to successive British governments, help us with the issue of Kashmir, but no help is coming. All they do is sell arms to India.

    He went on to say:

    Narendra Modi was going to come here to this G7 meeting. He was going to buy arms. In India, people are dying under the coronavirus. Yet Narendra Modi is going round to the world buying arms. Do Indian people need arms? Do they need food or medicine? So this is the question we are asking these so-called leaders.

    All ages came out to resist

    It was also possibly the most diverse age range of people we’ve ever seen at a summit. On day one, Fridays for Future, alongside Cornwall Youth Climate Alliance marched on the streets of Falmouth in a youth-led climate strike. And on the final day of the summit, hundreds of activists, young and old, barricaded the G7 media centre. They prevented journalists from entering or leaving as they protested the Policing Bill that is set to become law in this country.

    Kill The Bill Cornwall said that it targeted the media centre because:

    Approved journalists from the billionaire press are spinning the G7. An exclusion zone has been set up to report the essential news of what the world leaders and their spouses are wearing.

    The group went on to say:

    Six billionaires own or have majority share control of the majority of the UK press. These media moguls have a vested interest in protecting the interests of the rich. This includes protecting climate-destroying corporations, arms traders and the Tory government.

    This also means supporting clamping down on effective protest. They don’t want to see us taking effective action. Because effective action challenges their wealth and challenges their power. We’ve seen this is the way they’ve reported Kill The Bill protests. They repeated the police lies when they falsely claimed police officers were hospitalised at the Kill The Bill demos in Bristol. They described protesters as violent mobs when the cops attacked them. Police hit protesters on the head with the sides of their shields while they were sitting on the floor with their hands in the air. But the billionaire press claimed that it was the protesters who were the violent thugs.

    Kill The Bill Cornwall explained why we must keep resisting the draconian Bill:

    The policing bill is the biggest attack on the right to protest that we’ve seen in a generation. If passed, the police will be able to impose conditions on protests they see as too noisy. Meanwhile, if your protest causes serious annoyance, then you could face ten years in jail for taking to the streets. It threatens to criminalise trespass – in a country where we’re denied access to 92% of the land because it’s privately owned. It threatens the basic right to exist for Gypsy, Roma, and Traveller communities – outlawing their way of life.

    The streets are where we won our rights and built solidarity – and it’s on the streets that we’ll fight to defeat this bill.

    Fridays For Future Climate Strike
    Fridays For Future Climate Strike at the G7 summit

     

    Surveillance state

    It’s clear that the British state was twitchy. Anxious police sat outside the gates of the protest camps, surveilling those going in and out. Animal Rebellion’s camp was particularly targeted. It was raided by at least 60 police with dogs, and fifteen people were arrested. More were arrested when attempting to return to camp. According to the group, a total of 22 of their activists have been charged with conspiracy to cause a public nuisance.

    Meanwhile, at every opportunity, police intelligence gathering teams filmed activists both on the streets and on the beach, as surveillance drones followed people through town. Minibuses were stopped by police and delayed from getting to protests.

    police surveillance
    Police surveillance teams film activists at the G7 summit on 13 June

     

    Police surveillance drone
    A police drone surveils Kill The Bill activists protesting outside the G7 media centre in Falmouth on 13 June

    The resistance to this summit shows that things are changing in the UK. Activists who previously wouldn’t have worked together are now linking up in collective resistance. Whether we are from Palestine, Yemen, Kurdistan, Tigray, Kashmir or the UK, we know that we must unite to fight capitalism and fight our megalomaniac leaders. As Kill The Bill Cornwall says: “If they come for one of us they come for all of us”.

    All featured images by Eliza Egret

    By Eliza Egret

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • Diplomatic and military support – and a thriving arms trade – make the UK complicit in the oppression of Palestinians

    I often tell my first-year politics students that the study of politics is the study of power. And what we saw last month, above all, was the glaring disparity in power between Israel and the Palestinians.

    When Palestinians in Gaza and around the world celebrated the news of a ceasefire, breathing a sigh of relief, many commentators hailed it as a return to calm. For Palestinians, however, “calm” means a status quo of occupation, blockade, and repression.

    Related: The conflict in the Middle East is sustained by the silencing of Palestinians | Ghada Karmi

    Related: Why Israel fears the ICC war crimes investigation

    Continue reading…

    This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.

  • Key figure in 2019 anti-government protests was imprisoned for more than six months under national security law imposed by mainland China

    The Hong Kong democracy activist Agnes Chow has been released from jail after serving more than six months for taking part in unauthorised assemblies during 2019 anti-government protests that triggered a crackdown on dissent by mainland China.

    Chow, 24, was greeted by a crowd of journalists as she left the Tai Lam women’s prison on Saturday. She got out of a prison van and into a private car without making any remarks.

    Related: Hong Kong film censors get wider ‘national security’ powers

    Continue reading…

    This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.

  • On 12 June, campaigners are demonstrating against the deportation of Osime Brown. Brown is a Black, autistic 22-year-old who hasn’t set foot in Jamaica since he was 4-years-old. Campaigners are calling on those who can’t make the protest to take part in a Twitterstorm at 7pm on 10 June.

    Osime Brown’s case

    Osime Brown is a Black, autistic, and learning disabled young man facing deportation by the Home Office. He was imprisoned in 2018 under the joint enterprise act for being present when someone else stole a mobile phone. As a result, he lost his leave to remain. Now, the Home Office intends to deport Brown from his home in Britain to Jamaica, a country he left when he was just four years old.

    Explaining that her son’s “whole life is like a conveyor belt, from bad to worse”, Brown’s mother said:

    Right now, the priority is Osime’s health and to lift the threat of deportation from off his head; it’s destroying him and he is struggling to cope with this uncertainty; for him it’s a torture, like being on death row, not knowing why or when.

    She added:

    Each time the doorbell rings he would say they are coming to get me.

    Reflecting on the injustice of the planned deportation, she said:

    My grandparents came to this country 1960 and contributed and I do too. My grandmother went to Jamaica and could not return, she died there and I am looking at history repeating itself. With the situation my son finds himself; there is no shadow of a doubt that he too will die if he is sent to Jamaica.

    Protest to stop the deportation

    In December 2020, over 100 public figures signed a letter to home secretary Priti Patel calling for her to stop Brown’s deportation. In February 2021, MPs called on the Home Secretary to halt the deportation. The judicial review on his deportation is expected to announce its findings soon. Justice for Osime Brown is now gearing up for a protest at midday on 12 June ahead of the judicial review decision:

    Sisters Uncut announced that the group, along with the Kill the Bill coalition, will be attending the protest in solidarity with Brown’s family:

    Labour for Free Movement announced that Labour MP John McDonnell, journalist Owen Jones, University and College Union president Vicky Blake, No More Exclusions, and Neurodivergent Labour will be taking part in the protest:

    Sharing a reminder about safety at the protest, Justice for Osime Brown shared:

    Join the Twitterstorm

    Justice for Osime Brown has asked anyone who isn’t able to attend the protest on 12 June to take part in a Twitterstorm to raise awareness about Brown’s case on 10 June at 7pm:

    Urging people to take part in the Twitterstorm, the Black Liberation Alliance tweeted:

    People looking to get involved in the campaign can also sign and share the petition calling on the government to allow Brown to stay in the UK.

    Featured image via @FreeOsimeBrown/Twitter

    By Sophia Purdy-Moore

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • Asia Pacific Report newsdesk

    Activists from the Fukushima Anti-Nuclear Indonesia (IANFU) movement in Indonesia have held an action commemorating International Ocean Day demanding that the Japanese government not dispose of nuclear reactor coolant waste into the Pacific Ocean, reports Liputan6.

    The protesters also staged street theatre outside the Japanese Embassy on Jalan MH Thamrin and in front of the Ministry for Fishing and Maritime Affairs office in Central Jakarta.

    “We from Fukushima Anti-Nuclear Indonesia are holding an action against the Japanese government in relation to the disposal of waste, because the disposal of this waste into the sea will damage the Pacific Ocean’s ecosystem,” said IANFU action coordinator Zaki.

    Zaki said the Japanese once dumped dangerous nuclear waste in Minimata in Kumamoto, a case which resulted in birth defects and the death of local people exposed to mercury in the Japan sea in 1956.

    As many as 2000 people out of 10,000 suffered damage as a result of the pollution of the Minimata sea.

    Because of this, the planned disposal of coolant waste from the Fukushima nuclear reactor into the Pacific Ocean must be halted because it would be highly dangerous to human health and the Pacific Ocean ecosystem, including biological diversity in the oceans, said Zaki.

    Zaki hopes that the Indonesian government as a maritime country will take a firm position by lodging its objections and opposition to the Japanese government’s plan.

    “Our country is a maritime country whose seas are very extensive. The distance between Japan and Indonesia is indeed far, but waste dumped in the sea will impact on the livelihoods of Indonesian fisherpeople,” said Zaki.

    Zaki said protests against nuclear waste dumping would continue if the Indonesian government failed to take firm measures.

    Translated by James Balowski for IndoLeft News. The original title of the article was “Aktivis Dorong Indonesia Tolak Rencana Jepang Buang Limbah Nuklir ke Laut”.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • Court has in effect liquidated the opposition politician’s movement by classifying it as ‘extremist’

    A Russian court has outlawed opposition politician Alexei Navalny’s nationwide political organisation on the grounds it is “extremist”, in a landmark step for Vladimir Putin’s crackdown on political dissent.

    The court decision, which had been anticipated, in effect liquidates Navalny’s non-violent opposition movement and bars his allies from running for office for years, as the Kremlin seeks to erase the jailed opposition leader from Russian political life.

    Related: The Guardian view on Russia’s opposition: given hell, but not giving up | Editorial

    Continue reading…

    This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.

  • Content warning: this article contains a video and descriptions of police violence that some readers may find distressing.

    In a few days the G7 world leaders will arrive in Cornwall. Alongside them, 5,000 extra cops from all over the country will arrive in the region. The summit is taking place a short drive from my house. And as I’ve written before, local people are in for a nasty surprise when this operation gets fully underway.

    Devon and Cornwall police are on a PR offensive. The force is claiming that people shouldn’t worry as they’ll be controlling the operation. And they want us to believe that they aren’t like other police forces. Yes, apparently Cornwall cops are all fluffy and lovely; they’re welcoming of protesters and just want to engage with us.

    While some protest groups, such as the Resist G7 coalition, have very strong messaging on policing, others, unfortunately, appear to have fallen for the police’s propaganda.

    But anyone who believes this is dangerously naive. It’s also dangerously offensive to all of us, myself included, who have experienced violence at the hands of Devon and Cornwall Police.

    And it’s really important that both everyone in the local community and everyone who’s planning to protest knows the reality of what this supposedly fluffy police force is really like.

    Systemic racism

    Institutional racism is rife within Devon and Cornwall police. Statistics from 2020 show that if you’re Black in Cornwall you’re 12 times more likely to be stopped and searched than if you’re white. This is higher than the national average where Black people are 9 times more likely to be stopped and searched. Black people are also 9.5 times more likely than white people to be subjected to force by the police in Devon and Cornwall. And 2.8 times more fixed penalty notices for breach of Covid regulations were handed out to Black people.

    Simeon Francis, a Black father, died in police custody in May 2020 in a Torquay police station. His family have also accused Devon and Cornwall Police of using excessive force during an arrest in 2019 in Exeter.

    He can be heard in the video saying he couldn’t breathe and accusing the police of racism:

    Personal experience

    I’m lucky. I’m a white woman who doesn’t have to face oppressive and violent policing because of the colour of my skin. I am incredibly privileged in my dealings with the police and recognise that privilege.

    But that doesn’t always stop the violence. In 2010, I was arrested on a warrant that should never have been issued for failing to attend court. I’d been to the doctor and had a letter stating that I wasn’t fit to travel. This is the account that I wrote about what happened at a Cornish police station:

    At Camborne police station I refused to get out of the car.  Nothing violent, nothing dramatic, just a quiet refusal to accept their authority, a refusal to co-operate with what was happening.  Several officers dragged me into a cell where male officers held me down while I was stripped of my clothes.  No explanation was given – the first I knew about it was when they started pulling down my trousers.  They left me, naked on the floor, with a grey paper suit to wear.

    No attempt was made to assess my fitness to travel despite being in possession of a doctor’s letter stating I wasn’t.  I saw a nurse briefly.  She entered my cell accompanied by a male cop who refused to leave, giving me no privacy to discuss my health.  I told her why I was on medication, but she didn’t listen, wanting only to work through her checklist of possible illnesses.  Later I saw she had marked me down as epileptic despite having told her my tablets were mood stabilisers.  Either way, I was not given my medication.

    During this ‘examination’, the custody sergeant entered yelling at me, telling me I didn’t have any rights.  When I argued back, he threatened to cause me pain before forcing me to the floor in a wrist lock.  I wasn’t allowed to speak to my solicitor until the following morning.

    The incident was deeply traumatic and contributed significantly to a subsequent breakdown I had a year later. I made a complaint and was told that I couldn’t be as traumatised as I claimed because I had written articles about policing:

    Eventually, I received an apology and compensation. But no action was taken against any of the officers involved:

    Don’t believe the bullshit

    The bottom line: please don’t fall for the bullshit. The messaging put out by the police is nothing but spin and lies. It is deeply offensive to communities experiencing racist policing and every single person who’s experienced violence at their hands.

    Anyone going on a protest needs to be prepared for the reality of summit policing. They need to be prepared for harassment, intimidation, arrests, and violence. I really hope this won’t happen. I really hope I’m wrong. But I’d much rather that everyone in the area goes into the next week with their eyes wide open and with informed consent about what could happen. Because believing and repeating the police propaganda is dangerously naive and puts everyone at risk.

    Featured image via Emily Apple

     

    By Emily Apple

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • A roundup of the coverage on struggles for human rights and freedoms, from Colombia to China

    Continue reading…

    This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.

  • Hotels in Cornwall are evicting homeless families. The council has told The Canary that it’s “not a result” of the upcoming G7 summit taking place between 11-13 June. But this doesn’t ring true.

    Homelessness in Cornwall

    BBC News reported that:

    About 130 people living in emergency accommodation in hotels have been moved out to make way for paying customers

    It said there were around 1,000 homeless people needing accommodation in Cornwall. But as Cornwall Live reported, this isn’t the true picture. It noted that:

    between April and December last year a total of 1,348 households asked their council for help after being made homeless, or as they were on the brink of losing their homes. Another 990 families were owed support after being threatened with the prospect of becoming homeless.

    During the coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic the government gave funding to local councils to house rough sleepers. As Cornwall Live said, the region had:

    As of December 31 last year, 524 households were living in temporary accommodation… including 169 families with children, and a total of 331 youngsters.

    But now, some of these are homeless once more.

    Nothing to see here

    A spokesperson for Cornwall Council told The Canary;

    The Council has faced exceptional pressures for emergency accommodation as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic. The number of households in temporary accommodation more than doubled in 2020 and demand continues at a high level.

    While hotels in Cornwall have honoured the bookings made, the temporary (and uncertain) nature of emergency accommodation means we are unable to secure long-term bookings. Accommodation is in short supply at present – competition from the holiday market at this time of year means there is very limited availability to meet the needs of homeless households. The current demand for accommodation is therefore not a result of the forthcoming G7 summit.

    But the council’s claim that the evictions are “not a result” of the G7 summit doesn’t ring true. Because a search of Expedia shows a different story.

    All in the name of profit

    On Friday 4 June at 9:30am, The Canary searched Expedia for one room from the 10-14 June. All hotels and holiday homes in and around Carbis Bay were sold out. A search for nearby St Ives, and then Penzance, returned the same result. Yet if you searched for a stay in both St Ives and Penzance from 7-9 June, there were hotels available. Likewise rooms were available for the week after the summit.

    So, hotels are full for the G7 – but not before and not after. This seems to show that the G7 may have triggered hotels to evict homeless families. It’s standard practice in the hotel industry to ‘close out’ availability on third party booking sites when you know there’s a big or popular event happening. That is, hotels tell websites they’re full so people can’t book rooms. This ensures hotels can get the highest price possible for their rooms.

    Moreover, it seems some hotels have inflated their prices due to the summit. For example, the St Ives Harbour Hotel is asking £1,087 for a double room for 7-9 June. Yet for 2-4 August the same room is around half the price at £547. Again, this kind of practice is common in the hotel industry. Of note is that this hotel still has rooms available after the summit.

    So, in short hotels have kicked homeless families out because they can make a killing from the G7. And then, it being peak tourist season in Cornwall, they certainly wouldn’t want the families back. As Cornwall Council’s cabinet member for housing Olly Monk admitted to BBC News:

    I guess they have decided they can make more money by going back to their normal business model.

    But the council blaming hotels is not really the full story.

    The council isn’t blameless

    BBC News reported that Monk:

    said people in need of emergency accommodation had been housed in hotels for large parts of the coronavirus crisis but only under rolling short-term contracts.

    They quoted him as saying:

    Because June is very, very busy hotels are turning round to us and saying they want to get back to normality.

    But the council isn’t blameless. It knew the G7 and tourist season would be happening. Yet it only put homeless families in hotels on “short-term contracts”. So, it was inevitable this situation would arise.

    A spokesperson for Cornwall Council told The Canary:

    Our priority is to keep people safe and we are working hard in the short term to find suitable emergency accommodation for all those who need it.

    We are taking steps to increase capacity for emergency, long term and specialist accommodation in Cornwall. We’ve invested more than £40m and acquiring over 100 properties so far. Our new purpose-built hub for rough sleepers will open in November. It will provide accommodation and support for 11 people. We will be using funding from the Government’s Next Steps Accommodation Fund over the coming months to provide homes and fund support workers. There are real pressures on emergency provision. But we are doing all we can to meet our duty to keep people safe, provide housing for those in need and improve security for provision in the future.

    But “doing all we can” rings hollow given the council would have had plenty of advance warning that this would be the situation.

    G7: peak corporate capitalism

    Direct action coalition group Resist G7 is on the frontline of the protests against the summit. A spokesperson told The Canary:

    The decision to make people homeless to accommodate tourists is utterly disgusting but shamefully unsurprising.

    We’ve been told time and again that the G7 will have a legacy for Cornwall. But all we’ve seen so far are vanity projects aimed at attracting tourists.

    We are sick of Cornwall being a playground for the rich where tourists are given more consideration than our local community. Cornwall is one of the poorest areas in Europe. However second home owners and those wanting to profit from tourism have forced property prices way above the reach of local people. No one should be homeless in Cornwall when we have houses that sit empty for half the year.

    We are supposed to be grateful for tourism. We’re supposed to be grateful that we have seasonal work to serve the needs of the rich. This is not good enough. We want Cornwall to work for those of us who live here and this has to include banning second homes and making sure genuine affordable housing is available to all.

    So, not content with being the pinnacle of corporate capitalism, inequality, and climate and ecological destruction – G7 leaders have now effectively been the catalyst in making people homeless in Cornwall too. They have worsened a problem that was already entrenched. What happens next for these families remains to be seen.

    Featured image via Hedgehog Digital – Flickr, the G7 – screengrab and Lefteris Heretakis – Flickr

    By Steve Topple

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • Peter Tatchell has protested against everyone from Mike Tyson to Tony Blair. So what did the human rights campaigner make of the Netflix documentary Hating Peter Tatchell?

    The title of Hating Peter Tatchell was the brainchild of its director, Christopher Amos. When, in 2015, he first became interested in making a documentary about my 54 years of LGBTQ+ and other human rights activism, he was taken aback by the volume and ferocity of hatred against me.

    So far I’ve been violently assaulted over 300 times, had 50 attacks on my flat, been the victim of half a dozen murder plots and received tens of thousands of hate messages and death threats over the last five decades, mostly from homophobes and far-right extremists. Amos envisaged a film that documented how and why my campaigns generated such extreme hatred.

    The writer is the director of Peter Tatchell Foundation. Hating Peter Tatchell is out now on Netflix.

    Continue reading…

    This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.

  • People stand near an illuminated Canadian Maple leaf as thousands gather in Toronto, Ontario, Canada to show their support for the people of Palestine, on May 15, 2021.

    Thousands of people across Canada, and around the world, have recently taken to the streets to protest the latest Israeli military action against Palestinians.

    My research examines how Muslim Canadians often face severe consequences for protesting prevalent social understandings in Canada. National conversations and encounters with state institutions educate them about their “place.”

    My most recent example of this is anecdotal and comes from a personal experience. In Hamilton, I attended a pro-Palestine rally with some friends. By our count, police issued tickets to at least eight Muslim women wearing hijabs out of a total of 12 tickets issued.

    My close friend, who wears a hijab, had arrived at the protest earlier than me with her two school-aged kids. Although they wore masks and stood socially distanced from the small crowd of protesters, two officers approached her and spoke to her aggressively about her violation of the Ontario stay-at-home order. According to her, one of them said: “I can ticket you or arrest you.” They issued her two tickets, each over $800.

    At that time, people were just beginning to congregate at the protest but Hamilton’s streets were full of people.

    Ticketing these eight women who wear the hijab is racial profiling. This targeting is typical of patterns I have found in my research. As a researcher on Muslim Canadian citizenship, I examine what happens when Muslim Canadians challenge Canada’s social order.

    Muslim Canadians who wear a hijab are seen to have less of a right to protest. They are called out more viciously, censured more severely and generally told to be grateful to the country that welcomed them — even if they are born and raised in Canada.

    When it comes to Palestine, Muslim and Arab Canadians are expected to be silent. This connects to a wider pattern of systematically silencing anyone who advocates for Palestine. People with no ethnic connection to the region are targeted as well.

    Progressive Except for Palestine

    Last summer, the University of Toronto’s Faculty of Law attracted international attention after it rescinded its offer of employment to Valentina Azarova, a Germany-based human rights lawyer and scholar. The university stated that this was due to issues arranging a visa and work authorization. However, several others, including human rights organizations, believe the offer was rescinded over Azarova’s Palestinian human rights work. An investigation into the incident has since absolved the University of Toronto. However, numerous voices have challenged the integrity of those findings.

    Vincent Wong, a lawyer, research associate and PhD student at the University of Toronto law school, was one of the hiring committee members and had a front-row seat to the entire process. He resigned from his job in protest. In an incisive analysis in OpinioJuris, an international law blog, Wong characterized the de-hiring and subsequent investigation as layers upon layers of white male privilege.

    In April, the Canadian Association of University Teachers (CAUT), an association of over 70,000 members, voted unanimously to censure the University of Toronto for their racism and disregard for Azarova’s rights.

    This is not an isolated incident. Across Canada, the atmosphere is menacing for those who would speak up for justice in Palestine.

    Last week, Canadian journalists who signed a letter criticizing the lack of Palestinian voices in the media were reprimanded by their newsrooms. Long-time CBC journalist Pacinthe Mattar detailed her experiences in an article for The Walrus. She explains how her reporting a story on Palestine was likely used to block her promotion.

    This global phenomena of being chilled into not talking about Palestine, no matter how progressive one may be, has a name: Progressive Except for Palestine. It refers to how many people take principled stands against injustice, but draw the line at Palestine. In this menacing climate, many people self-censor.

    New Law Bars Criticism of Israel

    In October 2020, the Ontario legislature adopted a controversial definition of antisemitism into law. The law conflates criticism of Israel with antisemitism. Discussions of justice for Palestinians have always been taboo in the West. Now, they carry the risk of significant legal consequences.

    A large group of Jewish Canadian academics released a statement decrying the increasing pressure to adopt this narrow definition of antisemitism that shuts down solidarity with Palestinians. This definition, some of the signatories pointed out, bullies those advocating for Palestinian rights.

    Global Land Rights

    Immigrants to Canada, such as my friend from the protest, take a colonial oath of allegiance to the Queen. Part of that contract is freedom of expression under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

    Every day, her children and countless other children across Canada, say Indigenous land acknowledgements. These land acknowledgements compel us to recognize how land and human rights injustices are woven together. This attention to how land and human rights are entangled should be both local and global.

    Injustices towards the Palestinian struggle do not stop at the borders of Gaza or the boundaries of East Jerusalem. They are here, in Canada, towards people like the Muslim women at the protests, academics, journalists and countless others who speak up about the injustices happening in Palestine.

    Thanks to Black Lives Matter and last summer’s anti-racism uprisings, the stage for racial justice has seismically changed. In recent years, Indigenous activism, especially the Idle No More movement, means more Canadians are aware of how human rights violations are inseparable from land injustices.

    When will Canadians stop punishing those who call for justice for Palestine?The Conversation

    Lucy El-Sherif has received funding from the Ontario Graduate Scholarship.

    This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • By David Robie in Auckland

    Bananas, balaclavas and banners … these were stock-in-trade for human rights activists of the New Zealand-based Coalition for Democracy in Fiji who campaigned against then Colonel Sitiveni Rabuka’s original two coups in 1987 and the “banana republic” coup culture that emerged.

    Many of the original activists, politicians, trade unionists, civil society advocates and supporters of democracy in Fiji gathered at an Auckland restaurant in Cornwall Park to reflect on their campaign and to remember the visionary Fiji Labour Party prime minister Dr Timoci Bavadra who was ousted by the Fiji military on 14 May 1987.

    Speakers included Auckland mayor Phil Goff, who was New Zealand foreign minister at the time, and keynote Richard Naidu, then a talented young journalist who had emerged as Dr Bavadra’s spokesperson — “by accident” he recalls — and movement stalwarts.

    The mood of the evening was a fun-filled and relaxed recollection of coup-related events as about 40 participants — many of them exiled from Fiji — sought to pay tribute to the kindly and inspirational leadership of Dr Bavadra who died from cancer two years after the coup.

    Participants agreed that it was a tragedy that Dr Bavadra had died such an untimely death at 55, robbing Fiji of a new style of social justice leadership that stood in contrast with the autocratic style of the current Fiji “democracy”.

    Naidu, today an outspoken lawyer and commentator, spoke via Zoom from Suva about Dr Bavadra’s unique approach to politics, not unlike a general practitioner caring for his patients, a style that was drawn from his background as a public health specialist and trade unionist.

    He referred to Johns Hopkins University in the United States — “the bible of global statistics about covid-19 pandemic in the world” — and remarked that Dr Bavadra had gained his public health degree at that celebrated campus.

    Covid and Dr Bavadra
    Naidu asked how, if he had been alive today and still prime minister, Dr Bavadra might have approached the Fiji covid-19 crisis with 46 new cases of infection being reported last night.

    Fiji has now had 360 cases in total since the first case was reported in March 2020, with 161 recoveries and four deaths.

    A shadowy Fiji banana republic 280521
    A shadowy “banana republic” … protesters imitate the seizing of Fiji parliamentarians at gunpoint by hooded soldiers in response to the first coup on 14 May 1987. Image: David Robie screenshot
    Late Fiji Prime Minister Dr Timoci Bavadra
    Prime Minister Dr Timoci Bavadra ousted in Fiji’s first coup on 14 May 1987. Image: CDF

    Naidu described the current leadership in Fiji in response to the covid pandemic as unresponsive and lacking in direction. He believes Fiji is in a worse position today than it was in 1987 and poverty and food shortages were a growing problem.

    The challenge for Fiji was a lack of consultation with grassroots organisations and a “bubble” mentality among the key leaders of Voreqe Bainimarama’s government that refused to see the suffering on the ground.

    “Everything was bad in Fiji before 2006 [when Bainimarama staged his coup],” he said, reflecting the leadership’s mantra. “Everything good in Fiji is after 2006.”


    Lawyer Richard Naidu speaking about Dr Bavadra’s legacy and the reality of Fiji today. Video: David Robie/FB

    Naidu referred to a social media posting in relation to the Samoan constitutional crisis when he commented: “ Australia and New Zealand must be wondering: Is Samoa ‘21 just a rehearsal for Fiji ’22.” The question is what would happen if Bainimarama loses the election next year.

    In spite of his fears for the future, Naidu said he still remained optimistic because of the young leadership and committed civil society that was emerging in spite of the barriers.

    ‘Have we won?’
    Looking back 34 years, Naidu asked the audience: “Have we won?”

    With a negative response, he challenged the participants to keep working for a better Fiji.


    Auckland mayor Phil Goff speaking at the Bavadra reunion last night. Image: David Robie/FB

    Mayor Phil Goff said that after the 1987 coups, New Zealand did not just have a “trickle of migration, we had a flood of migration, and I think something like 20,000 or 30,000 people came from Fiji in the wake of the coups”.

    And, he added, “that was a huge benefit to our country, it strengthened our country. But it was a huge drain on Fiji because these were the people with skills and energy and they could have been contributing had Fiji been a welcoming country, if everybody had first class citizenship.

    “But they didn’t see that future for themselves in Fiji and I understand that and they came to make a better life in New Zealand.”

    Goff called on those present to keep campaigning for human rights.

    "Criminals go free in Fiji"
    “Criminals go free in Fiji” … an image on display at the Bavadra event in Auckland last night. Image: David Robie screenshot

    Union and NFIP days
    Trade unionist Ashok Kumar recalled when he had worked for the Fiji Public Service Association and Dr Bavadra had been president at the time and he had inspired many people with the Nuclear Free and Independent Pacific movement, “which had been a big issue for Fiji”.


    Trade unionist Ashok Kumar speaking. Video: David Robie/FB

    Other speakers also spoke of their admiration for a “forgotten” Dr Bavadra and how they hoped to “keep his memory alive”.

    Former National Federation Party MP Ahmed Bhamji said it was hoped that the Bavadra lecture event would become an annual one and he declared that they were already planning for the 35th anniversary of Rabuka’s first coup next year.

    Bhamji was a sponsor of this year’s event and among his fellow organisers were Nikhil Naidu, Rach Mario and Maire Leadbeater, who was MC for the evening.

    Friends of CDF
    Friends of CDF …James Robb, Maire Leadbeater, Rach Mario and David Robie at the Bavadra event in Auckland last night. Image: David Robie/APR
    Organiser Nikhil Naidu
    Organiser Nikhil Naidu … thrilled with a successful Bavadra night. Image: David Robie/APR
    Former Fiji National Federation Party MP Ahmed Bhamji
    Former National Federation Party MP Ahmed Bhamji … engaging with Richard Naidu over Fiji’s future. Image: David Robie/APR
    Adi Asenaca Uluiviti (left) and Del Abcede
    Adi Asenaca Uluiviti (left) and Del Abcede at the Bavadra memorial event last night. Image: David Robie/APR
    Some of the CDF group and supporters at the Bavadra memorial event
    Some of the CDF group and supporters at the Bavadra memorial event in Auckland last night. Image: David Robie/APR

     

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • By Charles Maniani in Manokwari, West Papua

    A joint unit of Indonesian military and police have broken up a West Papuan rally against the extension of special autonomy and at least 140 demonstrators were arrested – but later released.

    The detainees were taken to the West Papua regional police Mobile Brigade (Brimob) command headquarters after the rally by the Papuan People’s Solidarity (SRP) was disbanded on Tuesday.

    Action coordinator Arnold Halitopo said that the arrests took place about 7.15 am when the demonstrators were forced into police tactical vehicles under tight security.

    “Our action was held at five points in Manokwari, first in front of the University of Papua campus, second at the AMD Amban, third at Reremi Puncak, fourth at Fanindi and fifth at the Wosi traffic light intersection,” he said.

    “This is our second demonstration to deliver our demands to the West Papua People’s Council (MRPB). The protest was broken up by police.

    “Hundreds of fully armed soldiers and police were closely guarding all points. One hundred and forty six of us were taken to the Mako Brimob. [We were] held there all day then released at 5 pm,” he told Suara Papua newspaper.

    The demands of the follow up action, said Halitopo, were expressing their opposition to special autonomy (Otsus) and for the right to self-determination to be given to the Papuan nation.

    Several people injured
    Halitopo said that several people were reportedly injured when police forced them into the vehicles.

    “Comrades were injured when getting into the vehicles. Several people had bruised faces because of the police violence,” he said.

    Halitopo also claimed that when they arrived at the Mako Brimob, the police asked the demonstrators for their fingerprints.

    “I asked, ‘why must we get our fingerprints taken?’ What we were doing is in accordance with the prevailing regulations on demonstrations.

    “But we were asked for our identities, full name, parents and employment. I don’t know what for,” said Halitopo.

    According to Halitopo, the action was a follow up to an earlier protest on Friday, May 21. They already had a permit for the demonstration and calls for a peaceful action had been circulated.

    But Halitopo said he was surprised that the police had blocked them from protesting for reasons which were unclear. It was said that they did not comply with covid-19 health protocols.

    Police intimidation
    Runi Seleng, one of the speakers at the action, said that after being transported to the Mako Brimob they were intimidated by police.

    “We were intimidated, including being interrogated about the field coordinator and who was responsible for the action, then they asked us to testify about Papuan activists who were said to be the key actors.

    “But we said that it was purely an action by the Papuan People’s Solidarity who are aware that Otsus has failed”, explained Seleng.

    After negotiations with police, four MRPB members met with the detained demonstrators. They wanted to hear their demands at the Mako Brimob, but the protesters insisted that it must be at the MRPB offices in accordance with an agreement with the MRPB speaker and demonstrators on Friday (May 21).

    “In addition to this, the protesters were determined to hold a follow up demonstration.

    “The people’s aspirations have not yet been received [by the MRPB]. Despite being intimidated and terrorised, we will come back again until our aspirations are heard,” said Seleng.

    Following the arrest a number of sympathisers occupied the MRPB offices until late afternoon asking the MRPB to immediately secure the detainees’ release. At 5.30 pm, the MRPB confirmed that they had been released and had returned home.

    Speaking separately, Manokwari regional police chief Assistant Superintendent Dadang Kurniawan confirmed that a group of people holding a demonstration without following covid-19 health protocols had been arrested and later released.

    Translated by James Balowski for IndoLeft News. The original title of the article was “Ratusan Pendemo di Manokwari Ditahan 10 Jam di Markas Brimob”.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • Dear Umbra,

    What is the point of the bizarre antics that different companies and organizations do to bring attention to climate change?

    — Just About Done Enduring Dramatics

    Dear JADED,

    Last week, I wrote about the scourge of greenwashing companies — ones that falsely and loudly proclaim to be concerned with climate change in order to sell more products. So it seems appropriate to move on to ostensibly well-meaning but bizarre demonstrations in the name of climate awareness.

    To pick a relatively benign example, the New Belgium Brewing Company announced last month that it was launching a new, intentionally unpleasant concoction under its popular Fat Tire beer brand. “To illustrate what the future of beer will look like if we don’t get more to commit to aggressive climate action, we’ve brewed up Torched Earth Ale,” the company website says of the beer, which is flavored with dandelion essence and smoke-tainted water. These are the kind of ingredients it says will be available in a heat-ravaged future. 

    This is not the first time New Belgium has pulled this kind of stunt: When it got Fat Tire certified as a carbon-neutral beer in 2020, the company marked the occasion by temporarily raising their prices to $100 per six-pack — an homage to the cost of 72 ounces of beer if nothing is done to abate our current atmospheric trajectory. 

    A weary consumer such as yourself, JADED, might ask, what is the point? If you are a person who’s spent more than a few late nights fretting over climate change, the taste or price of beer would likely not rank high on a list of concerns that includes mass displacement, collapse of infrastructure, and widespread disease. 

    New Belgium, however, claims to have had noble intentions. Their Torched Earth beer page contains a link to a website encouraging people to tweet at Fortune 500 companies to make climate plans. “We realize beer is the least of our worries in a climate ravaged future,” a company rep told me. “Most of our customers are concerned about climate change and want to see truly meaningful work from companies. We believe impact is the greater predictor of our long-term business success because it enables people to be a part of what our brand is trying to do (both in terms of our coworkers as well as beer drinkers) vs. just having a transaction with us.”

    Aha. One of the shared goals of marketing and organizing is to create an engaged and faithful community. Obviously, the end game differs — in the former case, you are trying to sell a product, and in the latter, you are trying to effect some sort of meaningful political change. Stunt releases of climate-themed beer is just a message to a customer base that says: You care about climate change, we care about climate change, we belong together.

    This is a tactic, according to sociologist Dana Fisher, that climate-minded breweries share with confrontation-loving advocacy organizations, like the U.K-based Extinction Rebellion. Extinction Rebellion, also known as “XR,” isn’t all that big in the U.S. (yet), but is well known throughout Europe for headline-grabbing stunts like parading naked into the House of Commons to protest Brexit. The goal of doing something extreme, Fisher says, is two-pronged: “One is to send a message to people who are sympathizers, to appeal to them and get them to think that there are people who think the same way they do [about climate change] who are doing something about it. The other thing is to get in the face of people who disagree.”

    And, of course, the goal is to get the whole thing covered on TV, or Twitter, or what-have-you. But shock value in the name of press attention is an unstable currency at best. It’s not necessarily hard to get people talking, but that doesn’t mean the resulting conversation necessarily helps your cause. Greenpeace famously tried to send a message to attendees of U.N. climate talks in Lima, Peru, and ended up damaging one of the country’s oldest world heritage sites. Just last month, Extinction Rebellion was roundly ridiculed after mostly white protesters dumped wheelbarrows of “cow manure” (some speculate that it was actually store-bought fertilizer) in front of the White House on Earth Day. It was intended as a commentary on the perceived tepidness of President Biden’s climate progress. Instead, it provoked some criticism of Extinction Rebellion’s disregard for issues of race, class, and labor — specifically, that the group was forcing mostly Black and brown municipal workers to clean up giant piles of shit

    “All press is good press” seems to be the thinking of groups like the infamous animal rights organization People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, or PETA. But core message aside, the group’s attention-grabbing methods are often criticized as being overly aggressive, in terrible taste, or burdensome to people who could be allies to their cause — like, for example, Jews. One campaign that comes to mind compared chickens in cages on poultry farms to Holocaust victims. Attention-grabbing: yes; movement-building: doubtful.

    Climate action aligns with shock appeal better than many other issues. We’re talking about the fate of the planet, after all, and the scientific consensus is that we must act quickly if we are to avert many of its worst consequences. Climate anxiety and, yes, anger, are pervasive and growing sentiments.There is certainly a power in stunts that make environmentally-aware people feel like they are understood and that their fears and concerns are not only valid but shared. If you are a person who is sitting at home feeling helpless in the face of mass environmental destruction and political standstill, it is encouraging to see a group of people on TV or social media loudly and provocatively demanding attention to exactly the source of your anxiety. Even if the way in which they are demanding attention is kind of strange, like crazy-glueing one’s naked body to the entrance of the London Stock Exchange as a protest of climate-corrupting capitalism.

    Getting a critical mass of like-minded people together has been a game-changer for climate politics, turning general anxiety into growing political will. In a 2020 essay in the journal Medicine, Conflict, and Survival, University of Dundee medical student Fiona Mansfield argues that this was exactly the power of the climate movements that have cropped up in recent years: “Together the Youth Climate Strikes and Extinction Rebellion have created a wave of self-organizing first-time activists; people who have never before identified as ‘rebels’ or ‘climate activists’ have found a platform to stand up for the future of our planet.”

    We are living in a time in which “normal” or “sane” is a very mutable standard. If we are defining common sense as an ability to react to circumstances in a way that keeps us alive, then it is common sense to be highly alarmed about climate change and to behave in seemingly extreme or deranged ways to get other people to be alarmed, too. If you feel crazy, it’s kind of nice to see other people acting crazy on a global stage!

    Anyway, here’s to being weird if it gets your message across. Sell the weird beer, run naked into legislative chambers — whatever works! As long as it’s for something worth a little bit more than shock value. 

    Bizarrely,

    Umbra

    This story was originally published by Grist with the headline Do bizarre stunts actually help the climate cause? on May 27, 2021.

    This post was originally published on Grist.

  • Asia Pacific Report newsdesk

    Activists from the Papua People’s Solidarity (Sorak) have protested against Indonesia’s policies in the Papuan region, militarism and Israel’s war on Palestine, likening it to the West Papuan struggle against colonialism.

    The protest against Special Autonomy (Otsus) was held in front of the Merdeka building in the West Java provincial capital of Bandung on Friday, reports CNN Indonesia.

    The action by Papuan activists was staged to respond to the crisis in Indonesia’s eastern-most provinces Papua and West Papua which has become tense over a military crackdown.

    Based on CNN Indonesia’s observations at the rally, scores of people brought banners and gave speeches in front of the Merdeka building.

    In addition to this, there were several banners with messages such as “We reject Special Autonomy Chapter II, the creation of new autonomous regions and the terrorist label”, “Immediately release all Papuan political prisoners” and “Withdraw all organic and non-organic troops from West Papua”.

    Throughout the action, the demonstrators wore masks and maintained social distancing.

    Action coordinator Pilamo said there were a number of demands being articulated during the action. First, rejecting the planned extension of Special Autonomy status in Papua, and then rejecting militarism and the deployment of troops which would further harm the Papuan people.

    ‘Forced on’ Papuan people
    According to Pilamo, the Special Autonomy given to Papua by the government was just a policy which had been forced on the Papuan people by the central government.

    Yet, he said, since July 2020 the Papua People’s Petition (PRP) had declared opposition to continuation of Special Autonomy and it has offered as a solution for the Papuan people the right to self-determination.

    He claimed that as of May 2021 as many as 110 Papuan people’s organisations had joined the PRP and that some 714,066 people had declared their opposition to and the continuation of the Special Autonomy political package in Papua.

    “Because of this, we, representing the Papua people, are conveying this aspiration to Indonesia and the state that today in Papua things are not okay,” Pilamo told journalists.

    According to Pilamo, almost all components and layers of society had said that Special Autonomy had failed to side with, empower or protect the land and people of Papua.

    In addition to this, over the 20 years of implementing Special Autonomy it had impacted badly on the Papuan people, including causing environmental damage, Pilamo said.

    The education and healthcare system had worsened and the construction of roads were not in the interest of the people, but rather, in the interests of investors.

    Pacific Islanders for Palestine and West Papua
    Pacific Islanders for Palestine and West Papua at a rally in Auckland, New Zealand, yesterday. Growing numbers of Pacific islanders are linking up the West Papuan and Palestinians struggles as a common one – against colonialism. Image: David Robie /APR

    Palestine issue raised
    Aside from highlighting issues in Papua, the demonstrators also took up the issue of Palestine. In a written call to action, it demanded an end to the war in Palestine – a ceasefire was declared by Israel and Hamas the same day.

    They also highlighted a number of recent cases including the government’s branding of the Free Papua Organisation (OPM) as terrorists, a label which they reject.

    Pilamo believes that the label will only give authority to security forces to commit violence, including against civilians. He claimed that civilians often fall victim as a consequence of violence committed by the TNI (Indonesian military) and Polri (Indonesian police).

    “We call on the state and Pak Jokowi [Joko Widodo] as the president, we demand an immediate end to military operations and to stop [using] the terrorist label against the West Papua National Liberation Army (TPNPB). The TPNPB are not terrorists, they are part of the movement fighting for Papua national liberation,” said Pilamo.

    Similar protests were also held on Friday in Jakarta and the Central Java city of Yogyakarta.

    Translated by James Balowski for IndoLeft News. The original title of the article was “Warga Papua Demo Tolak Otsus dan Militerisme di Bandung”.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • A roundup of the coverage on struggles for human rights and freedoms, from Myanmar to Peru

    Continue reading…

    This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.

  • The Resist G7 coalition have accused Cornwall and Devon police of trying to repress protest after attempts to control demonstration sites and intimidate activists.

    The coalition announced three days of action from 11-13 June, to coincide with the arrival of world leaders to Cornwall for the G7 summit. The coalition is calling for climate justice, international equality and an end to repression and surveillance.

    However, Resist G7 and Extinction Rebellion, who are also organising protests around the summit, have expressed concerns about the policing of the protests given the police are designating sites for demonstrations that will not be seen by those attending the summit.

    Controlled protest

    The UK is hosting the G7 summit at Carbis Bay Hotel near St Ives. There will be 6,500 police officers at the summit with 5,000 drafted in from other areas.

    Originally, the police originally approved protests at four sites: Lemon Quay in Truro, Plymouth Hoe, Church Street car park in Falmouth and Flowerpot playing field in Exeter.

    The choice of Lemon Quay was particularly unpopular as it meant the cancellation of the Truro Farmers’ Market. Both XR and Resist G7 issued statements saying they supported the market and had no plans to protest in Turro anyway. Police eventually overturned the decision to designate the site for protest, and reduced the space allocated in Falmouth.

    Resist G7 has called on protestors to boycott the police-approved sites. A spokesperson for the group said:

    “We didn’t think the choice of protest sites could get any worse. But instead of listening to the concerns of protesters, the police have relegated to protest to an out of the way park and half a car park.

    Protesters voices will not be heard in either of these locations. Although we don’t plan to go to Truro, and are fully in support of the farmers’ market opening, we are outraged and disgusted that the police think a park is a suitable venue for a protest against the G7.

    The group also accused the police of trying to “repress protest”:

    The police are actively trying to repress protest. They’re attempting to play a PR game, giving interviews saying they support the right to protest. But they’re forgetting a fundamental point about the point of demonstrations. As the UN Human Rights Committee said in 2020, protests ‘should not be relegated to remote areas where they cannot effectively capture the attention of those who are being addressed’.

    We have serious concerns the police will use the provision of these sites to justify violence against protesters who refuse to use them. However, we will not be intimidated by their tactics and we will not be silenced. The G7 is not welcome in Cornwall and we will make sure that message is heard.

    Superintendent Jo Hall of Devon and Cornwall Police said:

    We are committed to working with partners, local communities and protest groups to ensure that people can exercise their right to peaceful protest in relation to the G7 Leader’s Summit in Cornwall next month.

    As part of the planning process, police and partner agencies identified a number of possible locations where protest could take place in a safe manner. In considering these locations, the impact on communities and businesses was a significant factor.

    Activist intimidation

    Meanwhile, a Cornwall G7 activist said police visited his home and workplace last week without a warrant, leading him to file an official complaint.

    Rob Higgs is the founder of climate group Ocean Rebellion and a theatre props maker. He said officers told him police would arrest him if he did anything to disrupt the G7 summit. This was despite Higgs saying Ocean Rebellion is “entirely peaceful” and “completely lawful” in its actions. Higgs told Cornwall Live:

    They searched the premises without any warrants, interviewing all my neighbours and tenants, asking about me, what I do and telling people at the boatyard that I am a ‘person of interest’.

    “I’m very saddened as it’s heavy-handed and their actions are stifling and intimidating the right to peaceful protest.

    The Resist G7 Coalition also spoke out against the “intimidatory tactics” used by the police:

    The police are making it clear that they will clamp down on any protest that isn’t in one of their protest areas. This is not acceptable. We will make our voices heard. This type of intimidation will not scare us and we will not be silenced. And it is this sort of behaviour that shows why we, as a coalition, will not be be talking to the police.

    The police are not interested in facilitating protest, they are only interested in criminalising and gathering intelligence on those who want to protest.

    Featured image via Resist G7

    By Jasmine Norden

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • The huge demo in London for Palestine on Saturday 15 May was the “rebirth” of the solidarity movement. The Canary was there to witness it. And we caught up with musician and activist Lowkey. He told us that the actions of the state of Israel in Gaza are the “snarls of a brutal regime” presiding over a “horrific siege” of the occupied territories. But the demo was marred by predictable police violence.

    Ongoing slaughter in Gaza

    As of 4:30pm on Sunday 16 May, Israeli forces have killed at least 188 Palestinians in Gaza in the past week. 55 of these were children. They’ve injured around 1,230 people.

    In the occupied West Bank, Israeli forces have killed a further 13 Palestinians. Meanwhile, Hamas rockets have killed ten Israelis, including two children. The violence is rapidly spiralling out of control. Al Jazeera, whose Gaza offices were destroyed by a targeted Israeli strike, said that in one protest in the occupied West Bank Israeli forces killed two people and injured 450 more; 100 of these from live ammunition.

    It was amid this backdrop that people in the UK protested on 15 May.

    Marching in London

    In London, people marched from Marble Arch to the Israeli embassy in Kensington. As The Canary previously reported:

    Organisers said crowds stretched back to Bayswater Road from Kensington High Street and total 100,000.

    Convenor of Stop The War Coalition (STWC) Lindsey German, who co-organised the demo along with the Palestinian Solidarity Campaign (PSC) and others, said the London march was:

    the rebirth of a mass movement for Palestine after years of attack

    The Canary was on the ground for the demo. It was a huge event. Of note was the vast number of different people there: all ages, ethnicities, and religions:

    People at the Free Palestine demo

    There were cyclists doing a “Big Ride for Palestine”:

    The Big Ride for Palestine

    As the demo progressed towards the Israeli embassy, the size of it became clear:

    It culminated with a rally, including speeches. Some people noted that ex-human rights lawyer Keir Starmer was nowhere to be seen. Comedian and activist Alexei Sayle called him a “little shitbag”. Starmer’s absence was made worse by the fact Jeremy Corbyn made a speech there. As The Canary‘s editor-at-large Kerry-Anne Mendoza tweeted:

    The Canary caught up with musician, historian, and activist Lowkey during the demo.

    A ‘snarling’, “brutal regime” killing with “impunity”

    He told us that the situation in Gaza and the occupied territories was “completely different” to that of Israel’s Operation Protective Edge in 2014:

    because you have the involvement of the Palestinian community within the Green Line, so within the state of Israel. You’ve got 1.5 million Palestinians, 50% of them are below the poverty line. There is a real history of impunity with police killing them. They have an affinity… to Palestinians everywhere else and are asserting their identity.

    His point is pertinent. Because on Friday 14 May, there were around 200 Palestinian protests around the occupied West Bank. Protests were held in 2014, with Israeli forces killing Palestinians. But they didn’t really take hold until Operation Protective Edge began. The point being that Palestinian resistance to Israel’s actions appears to have started earlier – before any official operation by Israel has even begun.

    Lowkey continued:

    most importantly, you have Palestinians of the Diaspora returning home as we speak. So this is really an incredible and deeply inspiring moment. Obviously, what’s happening in Gaza is the snarls of a brutal regime that has now over these years built up such a technologically advanced arsenal that it’s able to strike people in the way that they’re doing… that’s on top of an already existing frictionless occupation and horrific siege.

    Police: up to their usual tactics

    At the demo police were hovering around the whole time. During the main demo they stayed in the background. But after most people left, they became violent. Huck posted a Twitter thread containing the details, calling what was happening “incredibly violent”:

    This included, as it tweeted, riot police “appearing from within the [Israeli] embassy”. Police ‘snatched‘ protesters:

    Legal observers Black Protest Legal Support also shared details:

    The police referenced potential breaches of coronavirus (Covid-19) regulations when commenting on the demo. It was organised by various groups within the current rules. But given that during the main rally there was no social distancing, it seems to be unclear why the police decided to act when the majority of the demo was over. This is of course a continuation with what people have witnessed at recent demos; not least #KillTheBill.

    ‘Demolishing’ the narrative

    Overall, people at the demo were angry, passionate, and peaceful. Perhaps what was most telling was the sheer number and ages of the people that came out.

    It was also interesting that the corporate media actually reported on it; notably the BBC. Much of the coverage had the usual ‘there’s two sides to the story’, ‘police were injured’, and ‘it’s complicated’ caveats, but as former Telegraph journalist Tim Walker summed up:

    The most important point was, as Lowkey said, that:

    The narrative that’s being put forward by the BBC and the usual suspects, who… work tirelessly at trying to decontextualise this, and frame it as a sort-of battle that has some level of parity in it. You are seeing that narrative… being completely demolished, sliced through, and pierced… by those on this march, here. We haven’t seen a mobilisation [of the pro-Palestinian movement] like this in London… in the last ten years.

    The march served several purposes; not least as Lowkey said to demolish establishment narratives over Palestine. It also sent a strong message to world leaders: much of the public will not tolerate them standing idly by while Israeli forces massacre innocent Palestinians. But most importantly, it sent a message to the Palestinians of Gaza and the occupied territories. It told them that people do care; are in solidarity with them, and will do what they can to try and stop the state of Israel’s heinous crimes.

    The PSC and others will be holding another demo on Saturday 22 May in London. Full details are here.

    Featured image and additional images and videos via The Canary/Nicola Jeffery

    By Steve Topple

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • Pacific Media Watch newsdesk

    About 4000 protesters took part in demonstrations across New Zealand at the weekend calling on the government to take action over the Israel-Palestine conflict, and close the Israeli embassy.

    The rallies marked what Palestinians call Nakba Day or “Catastrophe” – recalling the loss of their homeland in 1948, when Israel was created.

    More than 2000 protesters, including many Palestinians, migrants, children, Pacific people and Māori, took part in the Auckland march protesting against Israeli “brutality”, “atrocities”, “ethnic cleansing” and “genocide”.

    More than 170 Palestinians, including at least 41 children, have been killed in the Gaza Strip in the past week. More than 1000 others have been wounded.

    In the occupied West Bank, Israeli forces have killed at least 13 Palestinians.

    Israel has reported 10 dead, including two children.

    The conflict has sparked calls for a ceasefire from the United Nations and a visit from a United States envoy as thousands of innocent people suffer the consequences of the worst violence since 2014.

    Livestreamed protest
    Protests were held at centres around New Zealand with at least one, in Christchurch, being livestreamed to friends and family in Gaza.

    A Christchurch-based woman spoken to be Television New Zealand News said it was difficult to contact family back in Israel, saying that “communication is monitored”.

    "Israel ... stop playing the victim card"
    “Israel … stop playing the victim card”. Image: David Robie/APR

    Maha Elmadani has a cousin in Bethlehem, a Palestinian town south of Jerusalem in the West Bank.

    “It’s been a little bit difficult when I communicate with him because phones are communicated over there and monitored and I feel that I can’t speak too much about it for fear that they might, I don’t know, get arrested,” she said.

    “I have to be careful what I say and how I treat the situation.

    “It’s difficult knowing that they have to deal with this and I am outside of the equation and I’m safe and they have to go through this every day.”

    Elmadani said the New Zealand Prime Minister, Jacinda Ardern, needed to “come out and say that what is happening is wrong”.

    ‘Same as fighting for Māori in NZ’
    “In the same way we fight for other ethnic minorities and for the rights of the Māori in New Zealand, we need to stand up and the government needs to stand up and say that what’s happening in Palestine under Israeli occupation is wrong.

    “People should be able to return to their homes and live peacefully,” she says.

    In Auckland, Green Party MP Golriz Ghahraman also urged Prime Minister Ardern to make a strong statement and denounce the “genocide”.

    She asked where was the “kindness and compassion” that characterised the government last year during the covid pandemic.

    In Wellington, blogger Marilyn Garson, speaking for Alternative Jewish Voices, told protesters: “I plead with our government to act. Jacinda Ardern, Nanaia Mahuta, where are you? Gaza is in great danger – we need you to stand up and help them. Occupied people are legally protected people and we need you to enforce the laws of protection.

    “To our fellow Jews we say, surely this is not the Israel you had in mind. So please join us. Standing here, together, you can see the future. This madness will end when we admit what we have done, when we listen, restore, return – then we can begin to transform this mess together. We who hold the power, we start by saying: ‘Our lives have equal value. Jewish supremacy is not our Judaism. I will not have it done in my name.’

    “Occupation is not our Judaism – not in my name. Apartheid is not our Judaism – not in my name. Bomb a million children behind blockade walls – never, never in my name. That is not our Judaism.”

    MP Golriz Ghahraman
    Green MP Golriz Ghahraman speaking at the Auckland Nakba rally on Saturday … seeks a stronger stance by the NZ government. Image: David Robie/APR

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • On 6 May, police carried out the deadliest raid in Rio de Janeiro history. This was executed in the predominantly Afro-Brazilian favela, Jacarezinho. On 15 May, Kill the Bill and United for Black Lives are marching on the Brazilian embassy in London calling for justice.

    Rio de Janeiro’s deadliest police raid

    On 6 May, Rio de Janeiro police launched a raid on the favela neighbourhood of Jacarezinho. Police were allegedly searching for drug traffickers. Authorities launched the raid in spite of a Supreme Court order suspending police operations in Rio de Janeiro’s favelas. At least 28 people were killed in the raid, making it the deadliest police raid in Rio de Janeiro’s history.

    Jacarezinho is home to approximately 37,000 people. The impoverished favela is a predominantly Black Brazilian neighbourhood. Afro-Brazilian lawyer and activist Joel Luiz Costa shared graphic footage following the raid:

     

    Jacarezinho community leader Leandro Souza told the Guardian:

    human life was worth nothing here. It was a total massacre, a witch-hunt, a horror film I never thought I’d see in real life.

    Reflecting on the routine nature of human rights abuses such as those taking place in Brazil’s impoverished favelas, Amnesty International Brazil executive director Jurema Werneck said:

    The number of people killed in this police operation is reprehensible, as is the fact that, once again, this massacre took place in a favela.

    They added:

    Even if the victims were suspected of criminal association – which has not been proven – summary executions of this kind are entirely unjustifiable. The police have the power to arrest – but the courts have the duty to prosecute and judge those suspected of committing crimes.

    Explaining the current situation in Brazil, a Twitter user shared:

    Bolsonaro congratulates Rio police

    Speaking out against Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro’s policies in the aftermath of the massacre, federal deputy of Brazil’s Socialism and Liberty Party David Miranda shared:

    International human rights bodies are calling on the state to carry out an independent investigation into the Jacarezinho massacre.

    In spite of this, Bolsonaro took to social media to congratulate Rio de Janeiro police on the deadly operation. He stated:

    I congratulate the Civil Police of Rio de Janeiro.

    He added:

    by treating traffickers who steal, kill and destroy families as victims, the media and the left make them equal to ordinary citizens who respect the laws and others.

    Brazil’s war on drugs

    Experts warn that authorities continue to use the war on drugs to surveil, criminalise, and kill Black people across the globe.

    Speaking at the UN Commission on Narcotic Drugs in April, chair of the UN Working Group of Experts on People of African Descent Dominique Day said:

    Globally, the war on drugs has disregarded the massive costs to the dignity, humanity & freedom of people of African descent, despite compelling evidence that it has succeeded better as a means of racial surveillance and control than as a mechanism to curb the use and sale of narcotics, which has only grown dramatically in the nearly half century since the War on Drugs began.

    Responding to the Jacarezinho massacre, professor Carl Hart shared:

     

    Black Brazilian day of action

    The Jacarezinho massacre took place amid the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, which continues to kill Black Brazilians in disproportionate numbers, and against a backdrop of deeply entrenched socio-economic inequalities.

    Black Brazilian coalition Coalizão Negra por Direitos called on Brazilians to take to the streets on 13 May to protest the Jacarezinho massacre, police brutality, and the injustices that continue to plague Brazilian society. Jacarezinho based organisation Lab Jaca shared:

    Highlighting the significance of 13 May, Matthew Clausen tweeted:

     

    Sharing images from the day of action, Coalizão Negra campaigners tweeted:

    Solidarity in the UK

    On 15 May, Kill the Bill campaigners announced a march on the Brazilian embassy in London:

    The protest is in solidarity with UK-based Afro-Brazilian groups Frente Preta and Encrespa Geral, and Jacarezinho’s Black Brazilian community.

    Featured image via Marília Castelli/Unsplash

    By Sophia Purdy-Moore

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • The situation in the occupied territories is rapidly becoming a human catastrophe. Israeli forces are killing more and more people. Hamas is increasing its assault and killing people, too. But it’s ordinary people caught in the crossfire. Palestine may physically be thousands of miles away, but in the UK you can send its people a message of support. Because this weekend, demos are happening across the country.

    The latest from Gaza/Palestine

    As The Canary‘s Sophia Purdy-Moore recently wrote:

    Since 10 May, the Israeli army has launched a number of deadly airstrikes on Gaza.

    And since then we’ve seen Israeli military forces brutalising Palestinians protesting ethnic cleansing, and resisting forced expulsion from their homes. We’ve also seen Israeli police attacking worshippers. And in keeping with the apartheid regime, Israeli officials have refused to vaccinate a majority of indigenous Palestinians.

    But things are getting worse. PA reported Israeli forces have so far killed 109 Palestinians, including 28 children. Its forces have wounded 621 people. Recently, PA reported that Israeli strikes killed Rafat Tanani, his pregnant wife, and four children. Meanwhile, US president Joe Biden has backed Israel’s actions.

    Israel claims Hamas has killed seven people, including a six-year-old boy and a soldier. And now, Israel is getting ready for a potential ground invasion of Gaza. As PA reported, it has massed troops along the border and called up 9,000 reservists.

    So, it’s well past the time when we need to act.

    Nakba Day

    On Saturday 15 May, there are demos around the UK. As Purdy-Moore wrote, the Palestine Solidarity Campaign is leading a national day of action. The group has organised protests in cities across the UK, including London. 15 May is also Nakba Day. As Al Jazeera wrote:

    May 15, 1948, is a date inked in infamy for generations of Palestinians who know it as the Nakba, or “the catastrophe”, after the declaration of the state of Israel in Palestine.

    So, people will be protesting Israel’s apartheid against the Palestinian people.

    Mass demos

    There are over 30 Palestine demos happening across the UK. Stop The War Coalition (STWC) have done a round-up of them. Several are in major cities, but people have also organised local demos. Some of them include (with Facebook event links):

    • Birmingham: Victoria Square, 2pm.
    • Bristol: Castle Park, 2pm.
    • Cambridge: Market Square, 11.30am.
    • Edinburgh: Princes Street (corner of Castle St), 11am.
    • Leeds: Leeds Trinity Centre (area outside Zara/Debenhams), 2pm.
    • London: march to the Israeli Embassy; assemble Speaker’s Corner (near Marble Arch tube station), 12pm.
    • Manchester: Platt Fields Park, Rusholme, 12pm.
    • Newcastle: Grey’s Monument, 11.30am.
    • Sheffield: Sheffield Town Hall, 12pm.

    There is also another demo happening in London. The group Apartheid Off Campus has organised a joint Colombia/Palestine demo. As The Canary previously reported, in Colombia police have been killing civilians who protested proposed government tax hikes. So, there will be demos outside both the Colombian and Israeli embassies:

    Watch out for the feds

    But as always, if you’re attending a Palestine demo expect a police presence. As The Canary‘s Emily Apple previously wrote, make sure you know your rights. Follow these simple steps from legal group Green and Black Cross to protect yourself on protests. Make sure you read The Canary‘s full details of them here:

    • NO COMMENT.
    • DON’T GIVE POLICE PERSONAL DETAILS.
    • ASK WHAT POWER UNDER THE LAW ARE THE POLICE USING?
    • DON’T ACCEPT A DUTY SOLICITOR.
    • DON’T ACCEPT A CAUTION.

    Also, watch out for the so-called ‘Blue Bibs’. These are police liaison officers. They may appear friendly and make idle small talk. But they are actually trying to get info on you and those you’re protesting with. So, do not engage with them at this weekend’s demos.

    Raising collective voices for Palestine

    If you can’t physically get to a demo, at 5pm there is a global online rally via Zoom. You can register for that here. On social media, make sure you use #FreePalestine, #SaveSheikhJarrah, and #Nakba73.

    The Palestinian people need our support. Because while our politicians sit on their hands, people are dying. The very least we can do is get out on the streets. We can send a message of resistance to all parties involved. And we can also show the innocent people suffering at this time that we care.

    Additional reporting and featured image via PA

    By Steve Topple

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • The Israeli government continues to commit human rights violations and war crimes against indigenous Palestinians. Since 10 May, the Israeli army has launched a number of deadly airstrikes on Gaza.

    And since then we’ve seen Israeli military forces brutalising Palestinians protesting ethnic cleansing, and resisting forced expulsion from their homes. We’ve also seen Israeli police attacking worshippers. And in keeping with the apartheid regime, Israeli officials have refused to vaccinate a majority of indigenous Palestinians.

    The UK government is supporting these human rights violations through arms sales, and failing to denounce the actions of the Israeli state. So it’s time to take action. Here are just some of the ways we can support indigenous Palestinians resisting brutality, settler-colonialism and ethnic cleansing at the hands of the Israeli state.

    Palestine solidarity protests

    The Palestine Solidarity Campaign is leading a national day of action on 15 May. The group has organised solidarity protests to take place in cities across the UK, including London, Manchester, Brighton and Cardiff:

    Organisations to support and donate to

    Islamic Relief is carrying out an urgent appeal to support their work providing medical supplies to those injured in Israeli airstrikes on Gaza:

     

    Friends of Al Aqsa is a UK-based campaign group working to defend the human rights of Palestinians:

     

    The Palestine Children’s Relief Fund works to provide humanitarian care for sick and wounded children in the area:

     

    Al-Haq works to defend Palestinian human rights:

     

    Addameer Prisoner Support and Human Rights Association is calling on the international community to take immediate action in solidarity with oppressed Palestinians:

     

    Medical Aid for Palestinians works to support Palestinians living under Israeli occupation, and those who are living as refugees:

     

    Boycott, divestment and sanctions

    Calling on the international community to boycott companies that are complicit in Israeli settler-colonialism and ethnic cleansing, the Palestinian BDS National Committee said:

    Ayesha Siddiqi added:

     

    Sharjeel Usmani shared:

    Another Twitter user added:

    Expanding in the list of companies, another user shared:

     

    Calling on student campaigners to urge universities to withdraw investments from the Israeli state, NUS UK president Larissa Kennedy shared:

     

    And MP Bell Ribeiro-Addy called on the UK to impose sanctions on Israel:

    Let’s Talk Palestine has developed a number of resources that campaigners can use to pressure governments to stop supporting the maintenance of the Israeli apartheid state.

    Amplify Palestinian voices

    Palestinians sharing news from Sheikh Jarrah and other occupied areas have said that their social media accounts are being censored. It’s vital we amplify the voices of Palestinian activists, journalists and residents on the ground. In the words of Mohammed El-Kurd, a writer based in occupied Jerusalem:

     

    Journalist Aya Isleeme shares regular updates from the ground:

     

    As does writer Mariam Barghouti:

     

    And Palestinian activist Muhammad Smiry tweets about life under Israeli occupation:

     

    Keep up to date

    As The Canary‘s Steve Topple highlighted, the BBC‘s reports of Israel’s bombing of Gaza revealed the UK’s mainstream media bias. Accounts posting information and updates on the situation in Palestine include:

    The UK is not innocent

    At the time of writing, Israeli air strikes on Gaza have left at least 69 Palestinians dead since 10 May. This includes 17 children. Sharing her heart-wrenching experience of loss, one Twitter user said:

    More than 300 people have been wounded by the violence. Palestinian journalist Aya Isleem lamented:

    The Canary‘s Kerry-Anne Mendoza set out:

    And explaining the role of western imperialism in the Israeli state’s reign of terror, Kehinde Andrews said:

    When highlighting the ways in which Britain is complicit in Israeli settler-colonialism and ethnic cleansing, MP Claudia Webbe tweeted:

    Rebutting prime minister Boris Johnson’s Eid message, Friends of Al Aqsa chair Ismail Patel said:

    On the need for global solidarity, Khaled Beydoun added:

     

    It is up to us to act in solidarity with indigenous Palestinians. It’s time to build a global movement for justice.

    Featured image via Ahmed Abu Hameeda/Unsplash.

    By Sophia Purdy-Moore

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • Protesters against Narendra Modi’s controversial citizenship law remain detained in prisons rife with coronavirus

    An ashen-faced Natasha Narwal emerged on bail from Delhi’s notorious Tihar jail on Monday evening. It was the freedom one of India’s most prominent feminist activists had spent a year fighting for, but this was an exit steeped only in sadness; it had come 24 hours too late.

    A day earlier, Narwal’s 71-year-old father, Dr Mahavir Narwal, had died of Covid-19, alone in a hospital intensive care unit in the city of Rohtak – another victim of the devastating second wave that has swept India in recent weeks. So far the country has registered more than 20m cases and a quarter of a million deaths, though most experts believe the true toll to be far higher.

    Related: ‘Modi is afraid’: women take lead in India’s citizenship protests

    Related: Delhi Muslims fear they will never see justice for religious riot atrocities

    Continue reading…

    This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.

  • At a dizzying pace, state legislatures have introduced bills restricting both voting access and the right to publicly protest this year. In response to Republicans’ 2020 election losses — and, in many quarters, in support of the false claim that rampant voter fraud led to former President Donald Trump’s loss at the polls — GOP lawmakers in 47 states have introduced more than 360 bills with restrictive voting provisions such as strict identification requirements, purges of voter rolls, and hurdles to absentee voting. Such bills have passed in Georgia, Iowa, Arkansas, and Utah so far.

    Spurred by the massive nationwide protests following George Floyd’s death at the hands of Minnesota police last year, Republican state lawmakers have also simultaneously introduced bills that restrict the ability of protesters to assemble, including legislation that grants immunity to drivers who strike protesters and that which prohibits public assistance for those convicted of unlawfully protesting. According to the International Center for Not-for-Profit Law, a nonprofit civil liberties group that has been tracking anti-protest legislation, more than 80 such anti-protest bills have been introduced in 34 states this year. Of them, at least six have passed. Three of these new laws specifically target environmental protesters by increasing penalties for trespass on oil and gas property.

    According to new research out Monday from the environmental nonprofit Greenpeace, the powerful state lawmakers driving both voting restrictions and anti-protest measures are often one and the same — and, despite their controversial legislation, these lawmakers enjoy substantial campaign support from major business interests. Over the past year, 44 state lawmakers sponsored at least one voting access and at least one anti-protest bill. Additionally, of the top 100 corporate donors to state lawmakers who filed voting access bills, more than half also gave money to lawmakers introducing anti-protest bills.  

    Source: Greenpeace

    Data refer to bills introduced between June 1, 2020 and March 25, 2021.

    Naveena Sadasivam / Clayton Aldern / Grist

    According to the report, all of the top 10 contributors to sponsors of anti-protest bills introduced since 2017 were fossil fuel companies — among them Koch Industries, the North Carolina-based utility Duke Energy, and the Nebraska-based conglomerate Berkshire Hathaway and its subsidiaries. When the focus narrows to the past year’s crop of anti-protest bills, telecommunication giants Comcast and AT&T join the list of top contributors to bill sponsors.

    Koch Industries, Duke Energy, Berkshire Hathaway, Comcast, and AT&T did not respond to Grist’s requests for comment.

    “The dying fossil fuel industry is using its power to stop peaceful protests that would hold it accountable for climate change and its impacts,” Valentina Stackl, an author of the report and senior communications specialist at Greenpeace, said in an email. “We only have a handful of years left to reduce the power of fossil fuel companies polluting our communities, our climate, and our democratic systems before we will rocket past climate thresholds and find ourselves at a catastrophic point of no return.”

    The introduction of anti-protest bills began accelerating around 2017 after protests for racial and environmental justice associated with Black Lives Matter and the Indigenous-led fight against the Dakota Access Pipeline received national attention. The Greenpeace report claims that such bills are a direct response to protests led by communities of color, “laying bare their racist intent.”

    Last month, hundreds of the most prominent American companies published an open letter in the New York Times stating their opposition to “any discriminatory legislation” that would restrict U.S. voters’ ability to participate in elections. However, Greenpeace has identified at least 12 signatories — including Amazon, General Motors, Facebook, and American Express — as having made campaign contributions to the legislative sponsors of restrictive voting bills during the 2019-2020 election cycle. In addition, though Comcast, AT&T, Duke Energy, and Amazon and 43 other companies paused or suspended contributions to members of the U.S. Congress who expressed support for January’s pro-Trump riot in Washington, D.C., these companies nevertheless funded  the campaigns of state lawmakers pushing restrictive voting legislation in 2021. 

    Amazon, General Motors, Facebook, and American Express did not respond to Grist’s requests for comment.

    “It is now more urgent than ever to build a just transition away from fossil fuels AND fight off attacks against protest and our freedom to vote, so that we can have a planet our communities can thrive on,” Stackl said in the email.


    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • COMMENTARY: By Marilyn Garson

    I woke up to the news and fear cut into me for my family in Israel.  Where are they right now?  I felt one moment of the fear that Palestinians live with.

    No false equivalence: nothing about this is equal.

    In video, Israeli police are heavily armed and armoured, backed by courts of ethnic law.

    Palestinians stand their ground wearing T-shirts.  An armed charge into an unarmed crowd is not a “clash”, it is an assault.

    Israeli soldiers have been vaccinated and most Palestinians have not. To hell with Israel’s legal responsibility. They knew that no state would hold them to it, and no state has.

    But look — Palestinians are changing the script before our eyes.  They are taking authorship.

    On May 8, 80,000 Palestinians came to Al Aqsa Mosque. Israeli police had violated their holy place and they came to reclaim it. They overwhelmed the roadblocks and the paramilitary police and faced them down with their bodies and their prayers.

    Unstitching the Green Line
    Palestinians protested in Ramallah and Jaffa, in Gaza and in Haifa.  They are unstitching the Green Line.  Palestinians and their allies are protesting around the world.

    Thousands of Israelis have been filmed dancing this morning, delirious at the sight of fire in the Al Aqsa Mosque.

    In 2014, Israelis sat on the hillsides of Sderot to watch the bombardment of Gaza.  I think their desensitised madness has spread; the soullessness that comes from wielding overwhelming violence with impunity.

    Wait, look again. In Gaza there is danger of a different magnitude.

    Gazan fighters fired rockets to join the uprising, to protest the forced expulsion of Palestinian families from their homes in Sheikh Jarrah.

    I am not fond of rockets, but having seen both rockets and bombs in action, I would prefer to stand near a rocket than a one-ton bomb.  A rocket makes a hole in the ground, while the airborne bombs of the Israeli military (IDF) make the earth tremble.

    Israel conducted airstrikes in Gaza on Monday evening, following rocket fire from Gaza that caused damage to one Israeli vehicle, and ‘lightly injured’ one Israeli civilian, according to an Israeli army statement.”

    Israeli bombs killed 21 Gazans
    Israeli bombs killed 21 Gazans overnight. They killed nine children, and injured scores of people. Let that attest to the relative value placed on one Israeli vehicle and 21 Gazan lives.

    International governments condemned the rockets and elided the rest.

    Israel, still drunk on its Trump licence, may believe it can bomb Gaza with impunity.  Gazans, with clarity and unfathomable endurance, with covid rampant behind a blockade wall, may feel they have less and less to lose.

    This is a formula for catastrophe. We must not let it play out again. Gazans are no symbols to be held up as proof after the fact.  They are human beings under assault right now, and they need our protection.

    Do not tut-tut them all to step back equally, because the inequality of the status quo ante was the cause:  a regime of dispossession, apartheid, blockade, ethnically determined lives and life prospects.

    We need to respond to the cause and the crimes. We need to demand that our governments uphold the laws they sign in our names to clear the way forward – not back. Intervene, protect, invoke the law, end the Nakba.

    Saturday may be Nakba Day, but Nakba is an event in the present tense until we – yes we, calling on law and justice with every means available – bring it to an end.

    Marilyn Garson writes about Palestinian and Jewish dissent. This article was first published by Sh’ma Koleinu – Alternative Jewish Voices and is republished with permission. The original article can be read here.

    Osraeli bombs strike Gaza
    “This is a formula for catastrophe. We must not let it play out again. Gazans are no symbols to be held up as proof after the fact. They are human beings under assault right now, and they need our protection.” Image: APR screenshot Al Jazeera

     

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • COMMENTARY: By Marilyn Garson

    I woke up to the news and fear cut into me for my family in Israel.  Where are they right now?  I felt one moment of the fear that Palestinians live with.

    No false equivalence: nothing about this is equal.

    In video, Israeli police are heavily armed and armoured, backed by courts of ethnic law.

    Palestinians stand their ground wearing T-shirts.  An armed charge into an unarmed crowd is not a “clash”, it is an assault.

    Israeli soldiers have been vaccinated and most Palestinians have not. To hell with Israel’s legal responsibility. They knew that no state would hold them to it, and no state has.

    But look — Palestinians are changing the script before our eyes.  They are taking authorship.

    On May 8, 80,000 Palestinians came to Al Aqsa Mosque. Israeli police had violated their holy place and they came to reclaim it. They overwhelmed the roadblocks and the paramilitary police and faced them down with their bodies and their prayers.

    Unstitching the Green Line
    Palestinians protested in Ramallah and Jaffa, in Gaza and in Haifa.  They are unstitching the Green Line.  Palestinians and their allies are protesting around the world.

    Thousands of Israelis have been filmed dancing this morning, delirious at the sight of fire in the Al Aqsa Mosque.

    In 2014, Israelis sat on the hillsides of Sderot to watch the bombardment of Gaza.  I think their desensitised madness has spread; the soullessness that comes from wielding overwhelming violence with impunity.

    Wait, look again. In Gaza there is danger of a different magnitude.

    Gazan fighters fired rockets to join the uprising, to protest the forced expulsion of Palestinian families from their homes in Sheikh Jarrah.

    I am not fond of rockets, but having seen both rockets and bombs in action, I would prefer to stand near a rocket than a one-ton bomb.  A rocket makes a hole in the ground, while the airborne bombs of the Israeli military (IDF) make the earth tremble.

    Israel conducted airstrikes in Gaza on Monday evening, following rocket fire from Gaza that caused damage to one Israeli vehicle, and ‘lightly injured’ one Israeli civilian, according to an Israeli army statement.”

    Israeli bombs killed 21 Gazans
    Israeli bombs killed 21 Gazans overnight. They killed nine children, and injured scores of people. Let that attest to the relative value placed on one Israeli vehicle and 21 Gazan lives.

    International governments condemned the rockets and elided the rest.

    Israel, still drunk on its Trump licence, may believe it can bomb Gaza with impunity.  Gazans, with clarity and unfathomable endurance, with covid rampant behind a blockade wall, may feel they have less and less to lose.

    This is a formula for catastrophe. We must not let it play out again. Gazans are no symbols to be held up as proof after the fact.  They are human beings under assault right now, and they need our protection.

    Do not tut-tut them all to step back equally, because the inequality of the status quo ante was the cause:  a regime of dispossession, apartheid, blockade, ethnically determined lives and life prospects.

    We need to respond to the cause and the crimes. We need to demand that our governments uphold the laws they sign in our names to clear the way forward – not back. Intervene, protect, invoke the law, end the Nakba.

    Saturday may be Nakba Day, but Nakba is an event in the present tense until we – yes we, calling on law and justice with every means available – bring it to an end.

    This article was first published by Alternative Jewish Voices and is republished with permission. The original article can be read here.

    “This is a formula for catastrophe. We must not let it play out again. Gazans are no symbols to be held up as proof after the fact. They are human beings under assault right now, and they need our protection.” Image: APR screenshot Al Jazeera
    Print Friendly, PDF & Email

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Protesters are to gather outside AstraZeneca’s Cambridge headquarters to demand the pharmaceutical firm shares its Covid-19 vaccine technology.

    The demonstration, organised by Global Justice Now, is calling for the British-Swedish company to openly licence its jab and commit to sharing the technology with the World Health Organisation (WHO).

    Protests are also planned at the firm’s Macclesfield site and at the University of Oxford, which worked with AstraZeneca to develop the vaccine.

    Global Justice Now said the action, which coincides with AstraZeneca’s annual general meeting on Tuesday, also seeks to persuade Oxford University to make all of its future medical innovations open-licenced.

    Nick Dearden, director of Global Justice Now, said: “Scientists at Oxford University, a publicly-funded institution, developed this lifesaving vaccine through a research and development process that was 97% publicly funded.

    “The resulting vaccine should have been openly accessible to everyone, but AstraZeneca swooped in and privatised it.

    “The UK is reaping the benefits of the highly effective vaccines that are now available, but people in low and middle-income countries are still dying daily by the thousands from Covid-19.

    “AstraZeneca like to portray themselves as the good guys, but they’ve boycotted attempts to pool the vaccine knowledge they control just like all the other Pharma giants – and now claim they have no time to share this knowledge globally.

    “Today, we’re demanding AstraZeneca pool this publicly created knowledge so the whole world can ramp up production of these vaccines.”

    The social justice organisation claimed that AstraZeneca has not yet joined WHO’s Covid-19 Technology Access Pool, which facilitates the sharing of technology for vaccines and treatments.

    It comes as the group put up posters at bus stops across the UK over the weekend to highlight the level of public investment in vaccine research and development and the profits made by pharmaceutical companies.

    AstraZeneca has been contacted for comment.

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • AQA has approved Black Learning Achievement and Mental Health UK (BLAM) to deliver educational units on Black British history. The achievement comes in the wake of government attempts to whitewash British history as set out in its recent race disparities report.

    The importance of teaching Black history

    The charity works to support and uplift marginalised young people through a range of projects and initiatives. It will now provide AQA award units on Black British history. The organisation is developing its own Black History module for Key Stages 1-5. This module will teach children and young people about the true history of people of African descent.

    BLAM’s founder Ife Thompson told The Canary:

    There are no avenues to learn about Black history outside Black history month. Our surveys from our project delivery with children across London show us that  young people still do not learn about Black history in a cross-curricular way. They tell us how they feel overlooked, undervalued and unseen. Educators, community organisers and schools must do more to ensure Black narratives are included and incorporated into their own curriculums and direct project work.

    She added:

    It is of particular importance as academic researchers have found that when a positive Black identity is attained, it improves racial esteem, acts as a buffer against the impact of racism and reduces depressive symptoms. Teaching Black history improves the racial identity and in turn wellness of Black children.

    She concluded:

    By providing an AQA Accredited Black British History module we are placing educational value and currency on the learning of our narratives. It enables Black history to be given the academic respect it deserves and enables children to have their cultural specific narratives rewarded at a level of value akin to the “valued” dominant exclusionary narratives.

    Black history is British history

    Thompson also told The Canary:

    The current educational curriculum is Eurocentric as it gives disproportionate attention to European and Western achievements and omits or white washes the existence and contributions of Black persons/communities.

    Black British people, African Americans, Afro-Caribbeans, Afro-Latinx people, and many others in the diaspora, have all made significant contributions to the UK and beyond. Black history is British history. Learning about histories of race and resistance is integral to understanding the story of modern Britain. We can’t begin to tackle the vast race disparities that exist today if we don’t know why they exist. Black-led movements for justice in Africa, Britain, the Caribbean, and the Americas can give us the tools we need to disrupt and dismantle the oppressive systems we continue to fight against.

    Education at the heart of Britain’s culture war

    Black Lives Matter protesters in the UK organised under the banner “the UK is not innocent“. This rallying call worked to highlight the histories and present-day realities of race and racism in Britain. The school curriculum is at the heart of Britain’s ongoing culture war.

    During Black History Month, equalities minister Kemi Badenoch argued that teaching children white privilege as a fact is ‘breaking the law’.

    The government’s controversial and poorly received race disparities report writes off calls to decolonise the curriculum as “negative”. It incorrectly sets out that the decolonising project aims to ‘ban’ white authors and replace them with “token expressions of Black achievement”. One of the report’s most concerning passages says:

    There is a new story about the Caribbean experience which speaks to the slave period not only being about profit and suffering but how culturally African people transformed themselves into a re-modelled African/Britain.

    In response to this, historian David Olusoga said:

    Shockingly, the authors – perhaps unwittingly – deploy a version of an argument that was used by the slave owners themselves in defence of slavery 200 years ago: the idea that by becoming culturally British, black people were somehow beneficiaries of the system.

    This dangerous faux pas clearly demonstrates why we must learn about Britain’s history of slavery, colonialism, and empire in an open and honest way. If we don’t, we won’t be able to move beyond patterns of racist thinking.

    Challenging historical amnesia

    The government’s review on the Windrush scandal found that  “institutional amnesia” was a key contributing factor. In spite of this, Black people in Britain continue to be erased, as reflected in the recent failure to commemorate troops of colour who fought in WWI. Britain’s colonial past still isn’t part of the UK’s compulsory curriculum.

    Thompson said:

    I believe the mandatory teaching of Black history will make these collective failings less likely to occur. History is a gateway to exploring how historical harms affect the future, whilst giving us the opportunity to learn from these mistakes and whilst placing harm reduction elements in its place. In the interim schools and community organisations must do what they can on a grassroots level to reduce the harms caused by the exclusion of Black people from the curriculum.

    These unjust exclusions feed into the ahistorical narrative that Black and Brown people haven’t contributed to British history, and therefore don’t belong in its present. If we want to build a positive future, we must acknowledge everything that has happened in the past.

    It’s time for us to make a concerted effort to undo the whitewashing of British history. Standing in opposition to the government’s vision for the education system – one that stifles critical thinking and dissenting voices – BLAM’s work is more important than ever.

    Featured image via NeONBRAND/Unsplash

    By Sophia Purdy-Moore

    This post was originally published on The Canary.