16 Just Stop Oil supporters are appealing their draconian sentences at the Court of Appeal today and tomorrow. The mass appeal concerns 16 political prisoners with combined sentences of 41 years handed down between July and September 2024. They are known as the Lord Walney 16. On Thursday, the second day of the hearing, at noon, the campaign group Defend Our Juries will stage a lawful and…
Expressing ourselves freely is a basic human right, and freedom of speech is an important part of this expression. Nowhere is it more important than in universities, where ideas need to be challenged, new perspectives developed, and independent thinking among students and staff should be the norm. Although the Equality Act is already in place on campuses, to make sure students are protected from…
A letter organised by the British Palestinian Committee, the largest umbrella organisation of Palestinian groups in this country, has expressed grave concern at Met policing of a pro-Palestine march on Saturday 18 January, which resulted in 77 arrests and charges under the Public Order being brought against organisers. The letter to the home secretary Yvette Cooper joins calls for an…
Climate protester Gaie Delap has been told that she must serve a further 20 days in prison for being “unlawfully at large” – just as 25 leading charities call on the Labour government to release her. Gaie’s additional 20 days is accounted for by the days that followed Serco/EMS’s report of 28 November on their failure to fit an appropriate tag on her wrist, and her eventual return to prison…
At around 5am on Tuesday 28 January, Palestine Action crashed a van into front of Teledyne Defence and Space in Shipley – yet another arms manufacturer complicit in Israel’s ongoing genocide and ethnic cleansing in Gaza. The van hit the main perimeter: Activists then attached themselves to the vehicle in order to disrupt the factory’s shipments of weapons parts to be used against the…
Protesters vow that arms dealers and politicians will not dine in peace at their £265-£540-a-head annual dinner – as they prepare another year of disruption to the event. The Aerospace, Defence & Security (ADS) Group is an arms-industry trade body that represents most of the world’s biggest arms firms. And according to Campaign Against Arms Trade (CAAT), every year it holds a dinner to “bring…
The United Nations (UN) has formally intervened in the case of the Palestine Action ‘Filton 18‘ – currently on remand over their action at a UK-based Israel-supplying arms factory owned by Elbit Systems. The UN letter, while polite, does not pull any punches – and exposes the misuse of counter-terror laws and blatant state-sanctioned mistreatment of the activists. However, the UK government has…
Fossil Free London activists disrupted the closing performance of Matthew Bourne’s Swan Lake at Sadler’s Wells on Sunday 26 January, to urge the theatre to cut ties with Barclays over the bank’s funding of fossil fuels and arms. The demonstration began with 10 protesters dressed in Swan Lake costumes staging a “die-in” outside the theatre, accompanied by a cellist: The protesters fell to…
On Friday 24 January, a Palestine Action political prisoner was released from HMP Dovegate after spending almost a month on remand. It was over a Christmas Day action at UAV Engines – a company directly complicit in Israel’s genocide in Gaza. Bryn Higgs, from Ullapool, was arrested on 25 December 2024 alongside four others following an action which destroyed the walls at the premises of UAV…
The movement to demand action on climate change took a new turn on October 14, 2022, the day that a pair of activists in London’s National Gallery tossed tomato soup at the glass in front of Vincent van Gogh’s “Sunflowers” painting.
Most people didn’t like the spectacle, an attempt to grab public attention by vandalizing a celebrated work of art, but that was kind of the point. After decades of peaceful protests, climate activists hadn’t gotten anything close to what they wanted. Even as people around the world had begun to experience the sobering effects of climate change firsthand — sweating through heat waves and breathing in acrid smoke from wildfires — global carbon dioxide emissions were still increasing, and elected governments were still signing off on new oil and gas projects. Activists felt like they had to try something different: What could they do to shake things up and get people’s attention?
That question is only becoming more pressing as President Donald Trump begins his second term in office, declaring an “energy emergency” in his inaugural address on Monday to expand fossil fuel production. “This moment is so incredibly far from anywhere close to even where we want to be fighting on,” said Keanu Arpels-Josiah, a 19-year-old organizer with Fridays for Future NYC, a youth-led climate activist group, in the days after the November presidential election.
When Trump entered the White House for the first time in 2017, climate activism was infused with a fresh wave of energy, building on the momentum of the broader “American Resistance” that rose up against his policies. A movement once tied to pipeline protests and university divestment started attracting widespread attention, with brand-new groups led by young people like the Sunrise Movement and Zero Hour staging marches and occupying Congressional offices. The Swedish teenager Greta Thunberg started skipping school on Fridays in 2018 to protest the lack of government action, inspiring teenagers around the world to participate in “school strikes.” Calling for a “Green New Deal” became a popular slogan among progressives.
“We were seeing this crazy, very, very fractured climate movement, which was in abeyance, where most Americans, while they said they cared about climate change, were not willing to march in the streets for it,” said Dana Fisher, a professor at American University who has studied climate activism for more than two decades. “That all is over.”
With Trump back in the White House, she expects climate advocates will start working together again, alongside people representing other progressive causes, since they’ll have a common enemy. “Will the Resistance rise again? Yes,” Fisher said. “Will the Resistance look the same? Absolutely not.”
Members of Fridays for Future protest in Davos on January 22 against President Trump’s remarks on increasing fossil fuel production, as the World Economic Forum takes place in Switzerland. Halil Sagirkaya / Anadolu via Getty Images
The first sign that progressive activists would respond to the new Trump administration by banding together came two days before the presidential inauguration, when an estimated 50,000 people participated in the People’s March in Washington, D.C., on January 18, protesting for reproductive rights, LGBTQ+ rights, and racial justice, along with other causes. Of the 453 protesters that Fisher’s team surveyed at the event, 70 percent named climate change as one of their top motivations for participating.
“All the different things we’re fighting for really are under attack,” Arpels-Josiah said. “I think we have no other option than to organize in a moment like this, right?” His organization, Fridays for Future NYC, is planning to hold a Youth Climate Justice Convergence on March 1 to discuss how to push for change in New York at the local and state level.
Climate activists expressed an appetite to try something new, but they haven’t nailed down an overall strategy for the next four years. “There’s definitely a sentiment that we’ve struggled to turn marches and mass mobilizations in one place into meaningful political change that changes people’s lives,” said Saul Levin, the director of campaigns and politics at the Green New Deal Network, a coalition of climate, labor, and justice organizations. “And so it’s not that we’re giving up on those methods, but we’re testing out different things.” Levin didn’t offer specifics about what the coalition will try out, but said he wouldn’t rule any tactics out, since there are different approaches across the movement.
In recent years, activists have blocked traffic in streets, spray-painted Stonehenge, and interrupted events to shame politicians they call “climate criminals.” These are signs that the climate movement is growing a “radical flank,” an offshoot that’s more confrontational and more disruptive. Experts say civil disobedience, even if it alienates people, can sometimes serve to focus attention on a cause and make tamer protests appear more socially acceptable. It’s not the same as establishing cause and effect, but anecdotes suggest there’s something to the idea. Two weeks after activists with Just Stop Oil spent a week blocking traffic in London in November 2022, for instance, surveys found that people in the United Kingdom were more likely to support the more moderate group Friends of the Earth, according to a study last fall.
“Climate activists will absolutely be staying peaceful, but they will not be staying non-disruptive,” Fisher said. A Trump administration hostile to action could provide more fuel for groups like Climate Defiance, whose activists frequently get arrested for confronting oil executives and politicians.
Saul Levin speaks at a rally in Washington, D.C., in November, calling for Biden to act on climate before leaving office.
Andrew Derek Strachan
Of course, civil disobedience is just one tool among many, and activists are leaning into more popular forms of organizing, like rallies, in order to attract a big crowd. “We need everyone right now, and to build real power on climate justice, we need a bigger coalition than we’ve ever had or ever seen,” Levin said at a mass organizing call for climate groups the day after the inauguration. “And that starts by gathering people in communities to build power for people by people.” In February, the Climate Action Campaign, a coalition of environmental and health organizations, plans to hold “Climate Can’t Wait” rallies in Atlanta, Pittsburgh, and Detroit, hoping to “mobilize the largest possible number of people to demand action.”
Aru Shiney-Ajay, the executive director of the Sunrise Movement, has been working with organizers in Los Angeles on a number of actions in response to the devastation brought by recent wildfires. In the week before the presidential inauguration, members from the L.A. hub of Sunrise led a multi-day demonstration outside of the Phillips 66 oil facility in Carson, California, demanding that fossil fuel companies “pay up” for their contributions to the climate crisis, which made recent fires more dangerous.
“If we are to have any hope at truly winning, at truly turning the tides of society, at moving our economy away from the most powerful industry in history, the fossil fuel industry, we must build up the organizing power that it takes to actually disrupt the people in power,” Shiney-Ajay said during the call for climate groups.
Over the course of the five-day protest outside the Phillips 66 facility, neighbors stopped by to show their support — and even the oil refinery’s guards told the group they agreed with them, according to Shiney-Ajay. “Those are the moments that felt the most meaningful,” she said. In the aftermath of the wildfires, the sit-in created an opportunity to meet “people who had never encountered the climate movement at their doorstep before finding themselves in support.”
Activists with Sunrise Movement LA demonstrate in front of the Phillips 66 refinery in Los Angeles in January as a protest against the role oil companies played in exacerbating LA’s wildfires. Myung J. Chun / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images
The Sunrise Movement is drawing inspiration from historical examples of people successfully agitating for change, such as the Civil Rights Movement’s Montgomery bus boycotts of the 1950s, and the United Auto Workers Union strikes in Michigan in the 1930s, according to Dejah Powell, Sunrise’s membership director. “When we look at change and transformation [in society], a lot of it has come from labor: 40-hour workweek, the weekend, paid sick leave,” she said. “It comes from disrupting or threatening capital.”
Powell said the organization is looking to build on the success of the Friday school strikes that began in 2018, experimenting with sustained, month-long student strikes. The group also seems poised to expand its direct action efforts: Members of Sunrise recently interrupted the confirmation hearing for Trump’s nominee to run the Energy Department, Chris Wright, the CEO of a fracking company. No politician is off-limits, said Shiney-Ajay. “We have a saying: ‘No permanent friends, no permanent enemies.’” The executive director said the organization is open to an array of tactics, though it draws the line at violent protest.
Despite the peaceful nature of these kinds of demonstrations, Fisher says climate organizers should prepare for a crackdown on protests, with the potential for repression and violence. “I think that what we’re going to see is the Trump administration pushing back and pushing back hard against civil disobedience for sure, and potentially all forms of protest,” she said. “And that is going to quickly escalate what’s going to happen on the streets.” On top of that, over the past decade, more than 20 states have passed laws increasing penalties for protesting near so-called critical infrastructure such as oil and gas facilities, now sometimes punishable by years in prison.
Some of the training that climate activists have been participating in over the past couple of months has focused on nonviolent direct action and defusing tense situations, according to Levin from the Green New Deal Network. “We think that we need a new set of tools and refreshed trainings, because no one can fully predict the level of chaos and repression that’s going to come from this extremist administration.”
Amid that chaos, the climate movement will be looking not just for new tactics, but also an updated message. Some of the economic concerns that are credited with driving Trump into the presidency, such as inflation and the rising cost of living, are connected to climate change, Levin said. The fires in L.A. are one example of how disasters like these threaten people’s livelihoods and financial security, he said. “We’ve talked about these things for years, but we need to update how we’re talking about them.”
Shiney-Ajay sees the L.A. wildfires as an opportunity to connect the dots between the climate crisis and other pressures facing the city, like runaway rent prices and a need for more resilient infrastructure, as well as a chance to bring more people into the movement. “People want to believe something will work or have something to believe in,” she said. Actions like the one at the Phillips 66 oil refinery help with that.
“Here is a way we can respond after disasters that is humane and kind and makes your life better and helps you believe in your government, helps you believe in a better world,” Shiney-Ajay said. The movement’s task will be to “hold that up in contrast to the vision of the world that Trump is proposing.”
On January 23rd, activists targeted Kelvinside Electronics in Glasgow, spraying the interior with red paint and leaving signs that read: “Drop Leonardo Contract” and “Don’t Profit from Genocide”: Kelvinside Electronics has supplied services for both Leonardo and Thales. Leonardo, one of the worlds largest arms manufacturers, has close ties to the Israeli state and to the Israeli based…
Unofficial adverts criticising Labour Party chancellor Rachel Reeves for accepting money from climate crisis-sceptic lobbyists appeared on several London Underground lines on Friday 24 January. The satirical posters say Your Chancellor, Sponsored by Climate Deniers: Rachel Reeves took £10,000 from them (so far). A modified party logo reads: Labour: still backing oil: Last year…
Following Elon Musk’s Nazi salute and establishment attempts to whitewash it, activists at Led By Donkeys have targeted the Musk’s Tesla Gigafactory in Berlin. “The world’s richest man”, the group warned, “is promoting the far right in Europe”. Considering the way Musk has been spreading racist disinformation and backing fascists all around the world in recent months…
Three men prosecuted for taking part in a peaceful protest at arms manufacturer General Dynamics were found not guilty of all charges at Brighton Law Courts on Wednesday 22 January. Laurie Holden, 72, Clem McCulloch, 33, and Thomas Delves, 25 – collectively known as the #Hastings3 – were arrested for aggravated trespass on 29 February 2024 during an early morning protest at one of the firm’s two…
Over two days on 29 and 30 January, the Court of Appeal will review the jail sentences imposed on 16 supporters of Just Stop Oil between July and September 2024: the Lord Walney 16. The sentences include the five-year prison sentence imposed on Roger Hallam, co-founder of Extinction Rebellion and Just Stop Oil, for taking part in a Zoom call to plan a protest against new oil and gas licences…
A Just Stop Oil supporter has been arrested on suspicion of planning to organise and/or attend a protest at a UK airport last year. In the latest episode of the ongoing farce that is the UK state – something Alan Ayckbourn would struggle to parody – Joe was nicked in some bizarre pre-crime maneuver by the police.
Just Stop Oil: nicked by the UK pre-crime division
Just Stop Oil shared a clip of Joe’s arrest on X. In it, he said:
It’s been alleged that I’ve been involved in plots of protests at airports about a year ago, and now the police have turned up at my door unannounced, told me they’re going to bash the door down, and are currently going through my room.
BREAKING: MET POLICE RAID JUST STOP OIL SUPPORTER'S HOME
Joe was arrested this morning for allegedly thinking about taking nonviolent action at airports last year.
At this point, it is unclear just what protest, if any, Joe was involved in.
As the Canarydocumented across 2024, Just Stop Oil joined around 21 groups across 12 countries. They staged a range of interventions at 19 international airports across the summer last year, causing serious disruption and having a global impact.
For example, in August six supporters of Just Stop Oil nonviolently blocked the departure gates at Heathrow Airport, causing delays:
Dozens of people were arrested. One of those nicked at Heathrow was Di Bligh who was formerly CEO of Reading Borough Council. She said:
Climate breakdown is endangering all we love. Starvation already threatens those who have done the least to cause this mess. Billions will be on the move as they try to find land they can cultivate, water to drink- any safe place.
Electric cars and windfarms won’t do it: governments must act together before we reach more tipping points into chaos than we can prevent. We need our political leaders to act now, by working with other nations to establish a legally binding treaty to stop the extraction and burning of oil, gas and coal by 2030.
However, Joe did not actively take part in a protest – yet cops have nicked him, anyway. Thanks to the government, though, police are allowed to do this – and already have.
Not the first time
As the Canary previously reported, in August 2024 police arrested four Just Stop Oil supporters near Manchester airport on suspicion of conspiring to cause a public nuisance. That is, they were planning to non-violently disrupt Manchester Airport. Police said it was because Just Stop Oil’s actions “would have brought significant delays”.
As you may well remember, this was at the same time police lost control of parts of the UK to far-right race riots.
Yet cops see fit to arrest Just Stop Oil supporters around the notion of pre-crime. And now, Joe is yet another victim of this authoritarian mindset that’s now infesting the UK. We have of course been here before. My late father, a prominent member of the UK Communist Party in the 1950s and 60s, would always recount stories of their meetings where the chair would, during the introduction, give:
A special welcome to our friends at the back.
The friends were, of course, Special Branch – and as the Spycops saga shows the state has always infiltrated anyone who it deems is or could in the future be a threat to it.
However, this pre-emptive action by cops is hitting another level of repression.
Just Stop Oil: martyrs for us all?
As Joe summed up:
Six police officers turned up for an alleged potential protest over a year ago… You can decide whether that’s a good use of resources.
Any rational, decent person would say ‘no’. But despite the planet burning, non-human animals becoming extinct, and marginalised people being further abused and repressed around the world – apparently it’s some kid with a hi-vis and orange leaflets that’s the problem.
Protestors led by Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND) and Drone Wars will gather outside the main gates of RAF Fairford in Gloucestershire at 1pm on Saturday 25 January to oppose plans to fly US Global Hawk drones from the base. The protest comes as the newly inauguratedUS president Donald Trump once again repeated his plan to ‘Make America Great’ articulating a ‘peace through strength’ foreign policy.
US drones in the UK: WTF?
The US plan to operate the huge RQ-4 Global Hawk drones from RAF Fairford as part of NATO’s ‘Agile Combat Employment’ (ACE) concept which argues that key military aircraft should be able to operate from different bases in order to make it harder for adversaries to conduct pre-emptive strikes.
As the Telegraph reported, “introducing the long-range RQ-4 Global Hawk surveillance drones to the Gloucestershire base means severing a vital flight path used by airlines serving the West Midlands airport several times a week”:
Now airport managers have written to the CAA warning that flights could be extended by hundreds of extra miles and delayed by up to 20 minutes while the Global Hawks are flying to and from Fairford.
According to documents submitted to the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA), the “working assumption” is that when the drones are at the base they will fly 2-3 times per week. However, a trial flight of the giant drone into the base in August 2024 seriously disrupted UK passenger flights arriving into Birmingham airport.
No, no, no
CND general secretary Sophie Bolt said:
The Global Hawk is part of the US spying apparatus and has been for decades, from the devastating invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan to supporting Israel’s genocide in Gaza. Whether it’s US nuclear weapons stationed at RAF Lakenheath or drone flights from RAF Fairford, these British bases are critical hubs for the US war-fighting machine. With Donald Trump back in power this is even more alarming. Instead of hiding behind bogus arguments of national security, the British government should be held accountable for the war crimes being perpetrated from these bases.
Director of Drone Wars Chris Cole said:
While in theory the UK has to give approval for any military operations carried out from its territory, given that the UK government is so determined to stand shoulder-to-shoulder with Washington, there must be serious questions as to whether the Government would ever refuse permission for flights, no matter what the purpose of the operation. Allowing US drones to fly from Fairford is effectively handing Washington a blank cheque for its drone operations and must be challenged.
From 7.30am on Wednesday 22 January, Palestine Action begun occupying ‘The Aviva Centre’ in Bristol over its ongoing complicity with Israel’s genocide in Gaza.
One activist is on top of the overhang of the ‘UK’s largest insurer’:
BREAKING: Palestine Action is occupying 'The Aviva Centre' in Bristol.
Aviva insures UAV Engines, a drone factory owned by Israel's biggest weapons producer, Elbit Systems.
Another spray painted the front glass of the building. Messages painted on the building include ‘Pal Action’ and ‘Elbit Out’:
Aviva: complicit with Israel’s genocide in Gaza
Aviva provides the mandatory employers liability insurance for UAV Engines in Staffordshire, a drone engine factory owned by Israel’s biggest weapons manufacturer, Elbit Systems.
Recent disclosures show the company no longer holds direct shares in Elbit Systems. However, as well as insuring an Israeli weapons factory, Allianz also continue to hold investments in funds which hold Elbit shares.
By insuring UAV Engines, Aviva is facilitating the design and production of drone engines used to power Israel’s killer drone fleet, including the Hermes 450 drones and IAI’s Harop and Harpy attack drones. Such drones are used to surveil, massacre and terrorise Palestinians, both in Gaza and in the West Bank.
In direct contradiction with facilitating Elbit weapons production, ‘The Aviva Business Ethic Code’ states: “Respecting our customers, colleagues, communities, partners and the environment is part of our approach to human rights. As a company, we have an obligation to ensure our business activities do not cause or contribute to violations of human rights of others“.
Elbit Systems provides over 85% of Israel’s military drone fleet and land-based equipment, as well as munitions, missiles and electronic warfare. According to Elbit’s CEO Bezhalel Machlis, the company “ramped up production” to arm the Israeli military to commit what the International Court of Justice ruled as a ‘plausible genocide’ in Gaza. The company routinely uses assaults on Palestinians as a means to market new weaponry as “battle-tested”.
Despite a ceasefire being implemented in Gaza, the Israeli military begun “Operation Iron Wall” in Jenin, West Bank. In the last 24 hours, they’ve killed 9 Palestinians and injured 70 in the region. Many of those killings were conducted using air strikes and drones.
Shut it all down
Palestine Action’s direct action campaign has also consistently target Allianz offices, as they provide insurance for the other Elbit British subsidiaries. Actions against Allianz included operations against 10 of their British and Irish offices overnight, as well as sustained actions against the insurers premises.
A Palestine Action spokesperson said:
Israel’s biggest weapons firm could not work in Britain in isolation. Aviva is providing the mandatory insurance Elbit needs in order to build Israeli weapons on our doorstep. Without insurance, the Israeli arms maker would not be able to operate in Britain.
Palestine Action will continue to take direct action against companies such as Aviva as long as they facilitate the destruction of Palestine and massacres of the indigenous population of the land.
Featured image and additional images via Palestine Action
Freelance photojournalist Matthew Kaplan was arrested in Gary, Indiana, on Jan. 18, 2025, while reporting on a pre-inauguration protest against large-scale deportations planned by Donald Trump’s incoming administration.
In a post on social media, Kaplan wrote that protesters had gathered at the Gary/Chicago International Airport to demonstrate against Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Regular protests have been held there since 2017 to object to its long-standing use by ICE for deportation flights, The Times of Northwest Indiana reported.
The demonstrators marched toward the airport from a nearby train station while chanting and carrying signs, including “Abolish ICE” and “No Human is Illegal,” Kaplan wrote. After spending around 10 minutes protesting near the airport, they began the walk back to the train.
“Soon some 10-15 police cars were tailing the group and ordered them to get off the active highway,” Kaplan wrote. “This order was eventually obeyed, but almost immediately after the marchers were on the grassy shoulder, police began to push people down and make arrests.”
Lisa Kiselevich, another freelance photojournalist covering the demonstration, told the U.S. Press Freedom Tracker that both she and Kaplan were photographing as police carried one of the arrested protesters to a police vehicle. She said she remembered thinking Kaplan was standing in the better position.
“I’m like, ‘Oh, he got the best spot there for his shots, because then he can see the person and the police car door open and everything. He’s in the perfect spot there,” Kiselevich said. “It turned out that the spot was not so lucky, because the (my) next shot shows the policeman grabbing him from the back.”
Kiselevich said she didn’t hear the Gary Police Department officer issue a warning before arresting Kaplan, adding that while the scene was chaotic it was clear that both she and Kaplan were only photographing the event.
She said Kaplan gave her his two cameras, along with his tripod and camera bag, because he was concerned the officers might wipe his memory cards. The officer allowed the handoff but repeatedly threatened Kiselevich with arrest if she didn’t leave.
“I said, ‘Well yeah, I’ll be out of here. Just let me grab his camera,’” Kiselevich said. “I did it and was walking, and then he walked behind me, the policeman, and he kept saying, ‘I will arrest you’ or ‘I’m going to arrest you’ or something like that. And not very loudly either.”
The Gary Police Department did not respond to a request for comment.
Kaplan wrote in his account that he was taken to the Gary Police Station and held for around two hours before he was released on charges of disorderly conduct, criminal trespass and resisting law enforcement.
“I don’t really like myself being the story, because there were two protesters who were arrested too,” Kaplan told the Tracker. “That’s what I thought I was covering. I thought I was just covering a march. I didn’t think I was going to be covering police action or my own arrest.”
Kaplan declined to comment further, following legal advice, before his initial appearance hearing Jan. 22.
Hundreds of people in southern Cambodia used tractors and motorcycles to block a major national highway for three hours on Tuesday to demand that provincial authorities address severe water shortages that have damaged rice fields.
Protesters tied tractors and other vehicles together across National Road 2 and used loudspeakers to rally farmers and other residents of Takeo province and to plead for help from Prime Minister Hun Manet and other government officials.
Takeo resident Aob Ratana said in a Facebook live video from the protest that authorities could solve the water shortage by opening a dam in the province’s Bati district to allow water to flow into the Bati River, which runs alongside rice fields.
Residents were angry that this particular request had gone unfulfilled, which was a major reason behind the blockage of National Road 2, which runs between Phnom Penh and the Vietnamese border.
“The rice fields are dying and will be gone if they do not help solve the problem,” he said. “The district and provincial governments are not helping to solve the problem for the people.”
Minister of Agriculture Dith Tina, Minister of Water Resources Tho Jetha and Minister in charge of Disaster Management Kun Kim met with the demonstrators at the site of the road blockage and promised to work on the issue.
Im Rachana, a spokesperson for the Ministry of Agriculture, didn’t answer when asked by Radio Free Asia how the government planned to solve the lack of water in the area.
A hard time this year
Cambodian farmers have faced several droughts over the last 20 years.
At least 1.1 million hectares of rice crops were affected and more than 30,535 hectares were seriously damaged by drought during the 2023-2024 dry season, which typically runs from November to April, according to the National Disaster Management Committee.
The national government should work to restore natural irrigation systems, such as existing lakes and canals, and should also look into building new canals, said Dy Kunthea, a board member of the Cambodian Farmers Solidarity Organization.
Aob Ratana warned on his Facebook live video that Cambodia’s overall economy would face trouble if too many rice fields fail this year.
“There is water,” he said. “But it is not being distributed to the people, and they say that the people will have a hard time this year.”
Translated by Yun Samean. Edited by Matt Reed.
This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by RFA Khmer.
Chris Nineham, co-founder of the Stop The War Coalition, will speak publicly for the first time tomorrow (Wednesday 22 January). It is following his arrest at Saturday’s Palestine March in London.
Chris Nineham: unfairly arrested
Chris Nineham, who was the chief steward of the demo, was one of 77 arrests made by police in what has been widely viewed as a major crackdown on the pro-Palestine protest movement. He will speak at the premiere screening of a new film about the censorship of coverage of events in Gaza in a London cinema on 22 January.
Also at the screening will be author and comedian Alexei Sayle and the mothers of three young female activists, who, it’s claimed, have been unjustly imprisoned for taking direct action in support of Palestine.
The producer of the film Censoring Palestine Norman Thomas said:
The police crackdown on pro-Palestine protesters on Saturday marks a new phase in escalating state censorship. This, combined with the outrageous use of counter terrorism laws to arrest journalists and activists, means we are seeing the biggest attack on the freedom of speech in living memory.
The police claimed this was to do with protecting a synagogue, but their real intentions were obvious — to deter any challenge to the state broadcaster, the BBC, and to do this in as harsh a way as possible designed to intimidate people from doing it again.
Thomas believes the police are acting on direction from the government.
He said:
Keir Starmer is really showing his true authoritarian colours. He is criminalising dissent and using the police to enforce state censorship. The BBC does not show us the truth about what’s happening in Gaza and now we’re not allowed to protest against the distorted version they’re handing us.
Censoring Palestine
Censoring Palestine explores the way the media has covered events in Gaza since October 2023 and documents what it claims are systematic efforts to suppress the “genocidal truth” of the conflict. It includes interviews with film director Ken Loach talking about his own experiences of censorship and the director of the Palestine Solidarity Campaign, Ben Jamal who was also interviewed under caution for his part in Saturday’s protest.
Censoring Palestine is the latest production from Platform Films makers of Oh Jeremy Corbyn – The Big Lie which was controversially axed by Glastonbury Festival in 2023 after an online campaign by pro-Israel lobby groups. The film will be screened in the Genesis Cinema in London on Wednesday 22 January at 6.40pm.
The screening will be followed by an open discussion with Chris Nineham, Alexei Sayle, journalist Sarah Wilkinson, the mothers of three imprisoned pro-Palestine activists, Stop The War Convenor Lindsey German, and the filmmakers.
Over 40 prominent UK legal scholars have condemned the actions of the Met Police in relation to Saturday 18 January’s Palestine March in London in a letter to the home secretary. They have called the Met’s approach to policing “an abuse of police powers” and called on the government repeal repressive legislation and defend the right to protest as a cornerstone of democracy.
Events on Saturday at the national Palestine protest have drawn a wave of criticism from across the political and social spectrum towards the Metropolitan Police.
The Met reneged on a previous agreement to allow a march from BBC Portland Place to Whitehall, a route taken several times before. It then sought to impose a route the pro-Israel Board of Deputies publicly claimed that it had proposed to the police.
This was rejected by the Palestine Coalition organising group. Finally, the Met banned any alternative march route allowing only a rally in Whitehall.
On the day there was a massive police presence, with police obstructing the gathering for the rally in many respects. There was an unusually high number of arrests of protestors.
The chief steward who organises the demonstrations for the Palestine Coalition in discussion with police was violently arrested on the day, and with the director of Palestine Solidarity Campaign, subsequently charged with offences under the Public Order Act.
Schmoozing with the Board of Deputies
It has emerged that the day after the protest the Met Police chief Mark Rowley addressed a meeting of the Board of Deputies in which he boasted he had “used conditions on the protests more than we ever have done before”, and that his team imposed “sharper and stronger conditions” on the organisers of the demonstration.
As Middle East Eye reported;
The day after the rally, on Sunday, Rowley gave a speech at an event held by the pro-Israel Board of Deputies of British Jews, where he said that “the powers to condition protests are quite limited – we’ve used conditions on the protests more than we ever have done before in terms of times, constraints, routes”.
“We have to take into account the Human Rights Act, that’s what the law says, and of course the rights of all communities, the rights of protesters and freedom of speech, etc,” Rowley said.
The Board of Deputies supported Israel’s war on Gaza and slammed the Labour government for imposing a partial arms embargo on Israel in September.
It was also one of the groups that reportedly urged the Met to ban the pro-Palestine march’s original route.
Dr. Paul O’Connell, Reader in Law, SOAS University of London said:
This letter is signed by over 40 leading lawyers and academics. People who, in one capacity or another, have worked on issues related to human rights and the rule of law for decades. It shows, in no uncertain terms, that these experts have the gravest of concerns about the policing of the PSC demonstration on 18 January 2025, and more generally about the assault on the right to protest in Britain.
Freedom to assemble and protest is the very lifeblood of a democratic society. If people protesting the commission of a genocide in Gaza are not safe to do so, then it bodes ill for individual freedom and democratic life in Britain in the twenty-first century.
The Home Secretary, and anyone else in a position of authority, has an obligation to act now, to make sure that the law and police tactics in Britain protect and facilitate the right to protest, as required by regional and international human rights treaties that Britain is a party to.
The following is a statement from Ben Jamal, director of the Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC). The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has allowed the Met Police to charge him with public order offences after the pro-Palestine rally on Saturday 18 January.
As the Canary has been documenting, cops have been fabricating events that day – accusing people of pushing through the police line onto Trafalgar Square. Prominent politicians, including Jeremy Corbyn, John McDonnell, and Zack Polanski – along with countless members of the public – dispute the Met’s claims, saying police gave them permission to pass.
Predictably, the Zionist lobby seems to have been involved – with notorious pro-Israel group Campaign Against Antisemitism already in contact with the Met:
During and after Saturday’s disorder in central London, a significant number of arrests have been made by @MetPoliceUK.
Charges have been brought against various individuals, including the Director of the Palestine Solidarity Campaign, Ben Jamal, shown here leading chanting in… pic.twitter.com/z3RWFQVVz2
— Campaign Against Antisemitism (@antisemitism) January 20, 2025
The Canary stands in solidarity with Jamal and all those arrested and charged – and against the lying, genocide-apologists at the Met Police.
Jamal’s statement reads as follows:
Yesterday I voluntarily attended an interview with the Metropolitan Police, to address allegations that I led, and incited others to join, a procession which forced its way through a Police line at the top of Whitehall, thereby breaching conditions imposed upon our protest.
Within two hours of the interview concluding, Police officers turned up at my front door to inform me that charges were being brought against me.
I am due in Court to face these charges on February 21st 2025, and will of course vigorously contest them.
What we saw on Saturday was a huge assault on the right to freedom of assembly and to protest. The anti-protest laws introduced under the last Conservative government are an affront to democracy and Saturday provided the clearest examples of the willingness of Keir Starmer’s Government to use them to suppress the Palestine solidarity movement, and the core freedoms of all of us.
It seems clear that the political intention was to create scenes of mass disorder which could be used to justify the Home Secretary intervening to ban all future marches. Despite this attempt, there were not scenes of mass disorder. This was due to the extraordinary and determined discipline of those who came to protest, even in the face of such provocation.
I thank everyone who attended and send solidarity to all those unjustly arrested, some of whom, including my comrade Chris Nineham of the Stop the War Coalition, are now also facing charges.
Ben Jamal and the Met Police
What the political establishment also seeks is to distract attention from their complicity in the genocide that they have green-lighted for the last 15 months. Those of us who have protested peacefully, in unprecedented numbers, against genocide and for a ceasefire, came on Saturday to mark that ceasefire and to share with the Palestinian people their feelings of relief that it has finally arrived, their trepidation regarding the likelihood of Israel renewing its brutal assault upon them, their grief for the family members slaughtered in the last 15 months, and their celebration, even as they return to their destroyed homes that, as they have done for generations, they have prevailed.
The state wishes to silence our movement. It will not succeed. We will not stop protesting and campaigning until every brick in the wall of apartheid that imprisons and oppresses the Palestinian people is torn down, until Palestinians in exile are free to return to their homes and on every inch of their historic homeland, from the river to the sea, are finally able to live in freedom with justice.
Ahead of President elect-Donald Trump’s second inauguration, thousands of people rallied in Washington, D.C., on Saturday at the People’s March to oppose his policies on immigration, abortion, LGBTQ rights, the climate crisis and more. We air voices of resistance from the protest. “All of us deserve to feel like human beings, and all of us deserve to have our rights respected,” said Hope Giselle…
Activists from Shut The System have cut fiber optic cables to offices of hundreds of insurance companies, in a new form of non-violent direct action. They call on insurance companies to immediately end all underwriting for fossil fuel expansion and demand robust transition plans from fossil fuel clients.
Shut The System: shut the Wi-Fi down
The action has caused huge levels of disruption with hours of work lost for insurance providers. These include three of the world’s largest fossil fuel insurers, AXA, W.R. Berkely, AIG and more than 400 agents at Lloyd’s of London and London’s iconic Walkie Talkie tower:
The group shut the following insurers down:
London:
Lloyd’s of London, comprising 402 brokers and 55 managing agents
20 Fenchurch Street (the Walkie Talkie building), the office of Ascot, Hardy, Kiln, Lancashire Syndicate, Tokio Marine, Markel, Ariel Re
Talbot AIG, one of the world’s worst fossil fuel insurers, which shares an office with RWE, the German energy company targeted by protesters against one of Germany’s largest coal mines – 60 Threadneedle Street
52 Lime Street – WR Berkley, Chaucer, two of the world’s worst fossil fuel insurers
Chubb – 100 Leadenhall street
AIG – Fenchurch Street
Birmingham:
AIG, one of the world’s largest fossil fuel insurers – 60 Church street
Sheffield:
Markel, insuring coal, oil and gas – Ecclesall Road South
Leeds:
AXA, one of the world’s largest fossil fuel insurers – 21 Queen street
Shut The System took action against these companies due to their critical role underpinning the fossil fuel economy through underwriting contracts and investments. The sector is simultaneously withdrawing coverage from climate-affected regions and raising premiums for households due to extreme-weather related events.
Insuring for the planet wreckers
A Shut The System activist said:
If these powerful companies don’t make public statements that they will stop driving fossil fuel expansion and destroying life on Earth, then we have no choice but to stop them ourselves. We will not give up until insurance companies take responsible action.
In recent years, the insurance sector has felt escalating pressure from environmental campaigners resulting in a string of breakthroughs. The insurer, Probitas, ruled out insuring West Cumbria Coal Mine and East African Crude Oil Pipeline after activists sprayed paint over their offices; and Zurich introduced new fossil fuel exclusion policies following negotiations with protesters.
The group took action on the day that climate science-denier Donald Trump is inaugurated into the White House for a second term, following his scathing remarks about the UK’s energy policies, saying the UK should ‘get rid of windmills’.
The growing urgency for the insurance industry to take the lead in addressing the climate crisis comes as we exceed the 1.5C critical threshold for global warming faster than many climate scientists predicted. This comes amidst of some of the worst wildfires ever seen in Los Angeles and severe flooding in the UK forcing thousands to evacuate their homes.
Featured image and additional images via Shut The System
Historic examples in countries such as Portugal and Greece show how military defeats can catalyze democratic transitions by exposing the incompetence of authoritarian regimes. After the recent change in Syria, I thought that this piece with its focus on HRDs deserves wider attention:
The Stimson Center published this anonymously on January 9, 2025 as the author is a Tehran-based analyst who has requested anonymity out of legitimate concern. The writer is known to appropriate staff, has a track record of reliable analysis, and is in a position to provide an otherwise unavailable perspective.
While the world focuses on regional turmoil, Iran is undergoing significant transformation domestically, albeit at a slow pace.
At the heart of this evolution is a surprisingly robust society-based reform movement that is actively challenging the existing power structure, leading to a noticeable weakening of the regime. This emerging dynamic holds the potential to produce a system more representative of wishes of the Iranian population than the theocracy/flawed democracy in place for the past 46 years.
Fundamental reform of the existing constitution, along with empowering civil society, can lead to more democracy provided that Iranians do not get caught up in radical movements and wars. The implications of such changes could extend beyond Iran’s borders to neighboring Arab states. Historian Robert D. Kaplan has argued that Iran serves as the Middle East’s geopolitical pivot point, and that nothing could change the region as profoundly as the emergence of a more liberal regime in Iran.
Iranian people have paid a high price in pursuit of democracy. One metric is the number of political prisoners. While it is difficult to give an accurate estimate, human rights organizations have estimated that hundreds of Iranians are being held on vague national security charges and denied due process. Conditions in Iranian prisons are abysmal, with reports of poor healthcare, abuse, and medical neglect. High-profile cases have drawn international condemnation, but the government shows little willingness to address these systematic abuses. The continued detention and mistreatment of political prisoners remains a major concern, reflecting the Islamic Republic’s intolerance of dissent and disregard for fundamental civil liberties.
Yet despite the repression, protests continue and at an accelerated pace. They include the “Bloody November” 2019 protests sparked by fuel price increases, the popular reaction to the U.S. assassination of Gen. Qassem Soleimani in January 2020 and the accidental Iranian downing of a Ukrainian passenger plane that followed, and the “Women, Life, Freedom” movement of 2022 against enforced veiling These developments, coupled with recent military defeats of Iran and its non-state partners, have dampened the Islamic Republic’s regional power while undercutting its domestic legitimacy, which had rested on electoral and ideological pillars.
Since the Hamas attack on Israel on October 7, 2023, and the devastating Israel response, the region has witnessed repeated and dramatic setbacks for Iran and its partners in Gaza, Lebanon and most recently in Syria. Historic examples in countries such as Portugal and Greece show how military defeats can catalyze democratic transitions by exposing the incompetence of authoritarian regimes. In Iran, the ongoing erosion of both electoral and ideological legitimacy may compel the regime to seek a more democratic approach to governance.
The path toward society-based reform in Iran is centered on strengthening civil society. Other strategies – such as seeking change through foreign intervention as advocated by some in the diaspora – would not produce a better outcome.
The society-based reform movement in Iran encompasses various grassroots efforts aimed at addressing social, political, and economic issues. Reformists emphasize grassroots engagement and building connections with the public. Key aspects include empowering local communities, promoting decentralized decision-making, rebuilding trust between citizens and political entities, and encouraging participatory decision-making. The movement prioritizes social issues and adopts a long-term vision for sustainable development.
The challenges to change remain significant. The regime continues to arrest and otherwise repress activists and economic constraints limit participation. Many Iranians are disillusioned and society is fragmented by cultural barriers. Despite these obstacles, society-based reform aims to facilitate meaningful change by leveraging the strengths and voices of local communities.
The reform movement in Iran has deep historical roots, predating the Constitutional Revolution of 1905-1911, which created the first elected parliament in the Middle East. The oil nationalization movement in the early 1950s was another significant turning point, leading to widespread social mobilization and civil society involvement, including the emergence of political organizations, intellectual activism, popular protests, and women’s participation. While then Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh is often credited with initiating nationalization, his true achievement lay in strengthening civil society, establishing an independent Bar Association, labor unions, and implementing reforms that favored peasants and small businesses.
Mossadegh was deposed in 1953 in a CIA-led coup which restored the monarchy and led to severe repression of civil society. The Shah’s regime viewed civil society organizations as threats, leading to political repression, media censorship, and the targeting of student and labor movements. This suppression dismantled the civil society infrastructure, contributing to widespread discontent and ultimately the Iranian Revolution of 1979.
The theocracy ushered in a new era of repression but that eased following the election of reformist President Mohammad Khatami in 1997. Iran’s reform movement split at the time into two factions: society-centered intellectuals and a power-centered left within the regime. Differences in approach emerged during 2001 presidential elections as well as the 2009 Green Movement against the fraud-tainted re-election of then President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
Since the 2022 protests, however, reformists who once favored participating in elections and government have shifted toward embracing society-based efforts. Azar Mansouri of the Iran Reform Front noted this change, emphasizing the need for unity among reformists and the importance of community-centered reforms given government-imposed limits on reformist participation in officially sanctioned politics. Former president Khatami and theorist Mahmoud Mir-Lohi have also highlighted that the movement is transitioning from an “election-centered” to a “society-centered” focus, aiming to reconnect with citizens and address societal needs.
This movement is characterized by a range of actors who include those working on:
Human Rights. Numerous organizations and activists, some with external links,are dedicated to promoting freedom of speech, press freedom, and the rights of minorities and marginalized groups as well as opposing arbitrary detention, torture, and the death penalty. The groups include HRANA, the Center for Human Rights in Iran and Defenders of Human Rights in Iran.
Women’s Rights. Women’s rights activists are at the forefront of the reform movement, challenging discriminatory laws and advocating for gender equality. Activists such as Nasrin Sotoudeh, Narges Mohammadi, Parvin Ardalan and Sepideh Gholian promote the right of women to choose whether to wear the hijab and have garnered significant attention and support both domestically and internationally. These activists have paid a high price for their beliefs and many are in prison serving long terms although Mohammadi, a 2023 Nobel peace prize laureate, was recently allowed home for a brief period after undergoing medical treatment.
Student Activism. Iranian students have a long history of political activism, often taking a leading role in protests and reform movements. Student organizations suchas the Independent Student Union advocate for educational reform, political freedom, and social justice.
Labor Movements. Workers’ rights groups have organized to demand better working conditions, fair wages, and labor protections. During the 2022 Women, Life, Freedom movement, 14 unions formed a coalition to push for new labor laws as part of a broader reform agenda. The Haft-Tappeh Sugar Cane Company union succeeded in ousting the director of the company, returning laid-off workers and encouraging formation of more independent unions.
Environmental Activism. Civil society groups are increasingly focused on environmental issues, advocating for sustainable development and government accountability regarding natural resource management and combating water scarcity and pollution.
Social Media and Digital Activism. Social media has empowered activists to organize, share information, and mobilize more effectively despite government attempts to suppress or filter access to the internet.
Various other initiatives promote civic awareness and participation. One such entity, www.karzar.net has initiated hundreds of big and small campaigns on a wide range of issues, most recently opposing a new law meant to enforce veiling. In reaction to widespread public rejection of the law, the government of President Masoud Pezeshkian paused its implementation in December.
Despite facing significant challenges, the society-based reform movement remains a vital factor in Iran’s political landscape. The example set by the fall of the repressive Assad regime in Syria may embolden the Iranian public to demand reforms and increase international pressure on Iran to embrace democratic changes.
The UK’s Stop Trump Coalition has released a statement on the day of Donald Trump’s second inauguration – 20 January – pledging to “mobilise in our thousands and our millions”. It has been signed by more than a thousand grassroots campaigners, trade unionists, climate activists and others.
Unfortunately, the original Trump baby blimp – whose images were shared around the world – may not feature. It currently resides in the Museum of London
Stop Trump is back
The Coalition organised some of the biggest protests in British history in response to the president’s state visits in 2017 and 2018. Back in July 2018, more than 250,000 people turned out in London for a Stop Trump protest:
Rather than a red carpet, there was a sea of people, as two large marches took place – one led by Women’s March London and another by the Stop Trump Coalition.
The crowds had strong messages for the president – from their problems with his policies to hair styling tips.
They were determined to make their voices heard, or at least create a lot of noise to make their point – that they did not want President Trump in the country.
Now, the Stop Trump coalition is re-grouping – and protests are expected in London and across the world today as Trump is sworn in.
Zoe Gardner, a spokesperson for the Stop Trump Coalition, said:
In the coming weeks, we are likely to witness appalling attacks on migrants and minorities in America – just as we saw with the racist ‘Muslim ban’ in the opening days of the first Trump administration in 2017.
It is essential that there is a broad, democratic coalition which can bring together the opposition to Trumpism – and to the new far right here in the UK.
That means mobilising in big numbers, but it also means working to network and strengthen movements on climate, anti-racism, migrants’ rights, feminism, LGBT rights and other touchstone issues, alongside the trade union movement and the left.
We will look to respond to the Trump administration’s first policies and to bring together the resistance to the politics of bigotry and division in the US and around the world.
Symptoms of the failure of our political and economic system
The statement, which has been signed by more than a thousand people, reads:
“The second inauguration is a dark moment. The far right is on the march, with a common agenda of right-wing nationalism, racism, sexism, LGBT-phobia, climate denialism, union-busting, authoritarianism, and elite impunity. They represent the interests of a wealthy elite who use bigotry and dishonesty to divide us against each other. No matter Trump’s claims, illegal occupations and crimes against humanity continue – whether perpetrated by Israel in Palestine or by Russia in Ukraine.
“We are not shocked by this situation. Trump and Musk – and Farage and Badenoch – are symptoms of the failure of our political and economic system. Free market economics and austerity laid the ground. By failing to challenge the far right on immigration and other key issues, and instead mirroring their rhetoric and narratives, Starmer – like Macron, Harris and Scholz – is handing victory to the far right.
“During Trump’s first presidency, the Stop Trump Coalition helped organise some of the biggest demonstrations in British history against his state visits. There are millions of people in the UK who want to fight back against the far right, stop runaway climate change, and stand for just peace across the world. There will be mass opposition to political cooperation with the Trump administration, and to any trade deal that threatens our NHS or food standards.
“Fighting back means mobilising in our thousands and in our millions – but it must also mean a more fundamental effort to unite and strengthen movements dedicated to social and environmental justice, working class organisation, and universal human and civil rights. We pledge ourselves to that work, and to building a resistance to Trump and the politics he represents.”
On Monday 20 January, Keir Starmer’s own council is set to decide whether to divest from companies complicit in Israel’s genocide and the illegal occupation of Palestine, after thousands of residents demand action.
Starmer: feeling the heat in Camden
Over 4,000 locals in prime minister Starmer’s own constituency have signed a petition demanding Camden Council divest from companies complicit in human rights abuses and the ongoing genocide in Gaza.
Led by Camden Friends of Palestine, the petition calls for transparency and divestment from companies such as BAE Systems, Lockheed Martin, and RTX: arms manufacturers that supply weapons to Israel.
A series of shocking Freedom of Information (FOI) requests exposed that Camden Pension Fund is currently investing millions of pounds in funds connected to these companies. Despite repeated attempts by the council to avoid scrutiny – canceling meetings, closing the public gallery, refusing deputations, and even involving police – this petition has forced Camden Council to hold a crucial debate and vote on divestment on Monday 20 January.
A Camden resident and spokesperson for Camden Friends of Palestine said:
Camden council has repeatedly ignored the wishes of its communities, actively sidestepping demands for ethical investment. This petition will make Starmer’s own council confront the question of divestment face on, for the whole of Camden to see.
There is clearly a huge groundswell of support for divestment from these companies that are currently supplying weapons to Israel. The council must end its complicity now.
Any other option but divestment would mean councillors prioritising a career in Starmer’s Labour party over the communities they represent, opposition to genocide and international law.
Dominated by the right wing of Labour
Presenting the petition to the councillors will be two Camden residents: Lubaba Khalid, a Palestinian resident, and Holocaust survivor Stephen Kapos. Both are vocal in their stance against the British government’s complicity in genocide and will be representing the 4,000 local residents who signed the petition calling for divestment.
It is widely considered that Camden Council is dominated by Starmer’s wing of the Labour Party.
In the 2024 summer election, several councillors from Camden Council were rewarded with MP seats by the Labour Party. These include former council leader Georgia Gould, who became an MP, along with Danny Beales and Lloyd Hatton, both of whom also transitioned from local politics to parliament.
This demonstrates Camden’s importance as a key political power base for Starmer’s Labour.
Camden is represented by two MPs, one of whom is the PM who’s constituency covers more 60% of the wards in the Camden Council. Starmer’s majority was significantly reduced in the 2024 summer election – down from 22,766 in 2019 to just 11,572.
This sharp decline highlights growing discontent in the constituency, in large part due to his position on Palestine and his support for the apartheid state of Israel.
Awkward for Starmer?
The decision the council faces follows the likes of Waltham Forest who committed to arms trade divestment amid pressure from Palestine activists.
Local residents and activists will gather outside Camden Town Hall on Monday 20 January to show their support for divestment and urge councillors to vote in favour of the community led presentation:
TOMORROW EVENING: Join us, @camden_psc and @camdenabudis outside Camden Town Hall to demand @CamdenCouncil listen to the 4,000 people who signed our petition:
DISCLOSE AND DIVEST THE PENSION FUND FROM APARTHEID & GENOCIDE