Category: Public health

  • Illustration of USA health care in sickly condition even with Trump face torn away

    If the United States had death rates on par with other wealthy nations such as Canada and Japan, there would have been 40 percent fewer deaths attributed to COVID-19 last year. In 2018 alone, an estimated 461,000 fewer people would have died if the U.S. was as healthy as France or Germany.

    The failure to contain COVID in the U.S. confirmed that our approach to health care and public health is broken, and former President Donald Trump made a bad situation worse. That’s the message from a multidisciplinary commission of experts assembled to study the Trump administration by The Lancet, a longstanding medical journal that has publicly tussled with Trump over the course of the pandemic.

    Since 2017, the international team of 33 leading experts in clinical medicine, public health, epidemiology, community medicine, economics, nutrition, law, and politics has analyzed how the Trump administration’s policies impact our health. The result is a scathing and detailed new report that is an indictment of both Trump and a health care system that values profit over human life.

    The life expectancy in the U.S. began falling behind peers such as the United Kingdom, Germany and France when Ronald Reagan became president in 1980, according to Kevin Grumbach, a professor of family and community medicine at the University of California, San Fransisco and co-author of the report.

    “That is the turning point where health started falling in the United States compared to the other G7 nations,” Grumbach said in an interview. “We totally shifted to conservative and neoliberal policies, and that corresponds with the deteriorating health in the country relative to other nations.”

    Reagan instated policies that reduced the government’s role in health care and education and accelerated the concentration of wealth among the upper classes. Since then, life expectancy has dropped 3.4 years behind other wealthy countries and remains even lower among Black people and Native Americans. The report found that, before the pandemic, rates of midlife mortality among Black people and Native Americans were 42 and 59 percent higher, respectively, than for white people. People of color are more likely to die from COVID than white people, and the mortality gap between Black and white people has grown by 50 percent during the pandemic.

    “The disastrous, bungled response to the pandemic made clear how existing, longstanding racial inequities simply have not been addressed,” said Mary T. Bassett, director of the FXB Center for Health and Human Rights at Harvard University and a member of the commission, in a statement.

    Reagan’s neoliberal political philosophy stuck around under both Democratic and Republican administrations and created conditions for the rise of Trump. The report links health to trade liberalization that led to the outsourcing of manufacturing jobs, weakened unions and left many parts of the country to struggle economically. According to the report, Trump exploited anger among white voters over their “deteriorating life prospects,” and stoked racism and nativism to win the 2016 election.

    “That’s the epidemic that we’ve been struggling through, not just through four years of Trump, but 40 years of failing to create the conditions that make for a healthy society,” Grumbach said.

    As soon as he took office, Trump and Republicans in Congress moved to destroy the Affordable Care Act, which expanded health insurance for millions of people. The GOP’s signature achievement, a massive tax cut for the wealthy, opened holes in the federal budget that conservatives used to justify spending cuts on health and food assistance.

    While attempts to repeal the Affordable Care Act failed spectacularly in Congress, the Trump administration used its executive powers to undermine the law. During the first three years of Trump tenure, the number of people with health coverage dropped by 2.3 million largely due Trump’s attacks on Medicaid, the program that provides health coverage to low-income people. About 760,000 kids and teens lost health coverage.

    Before the pandemic hit, the Trump administration proposed $920 billion in Medicaid cuts and was poised to require burdensome eligibility checks that would have pushed more people out of the program, according to the report.

    The Trump administration consistently favored corporate interests over public health when it came to climate and the environment and openly worked on behalf of the fossil fuel industry. The administration rolled back dozens of environmental regulations, allowing companies to spew more dangerous pollution into the air. Between 2016 and 2019, the number of deaths related to environmental and occupation hazards spiked to 22,000 after years of steady decline, according to the report. The administration also repeatedly attempted to suppress data showing the effects that pollution has on human health.

    The list goes on, but the Trump administration’s response to the pandemic stands out. Grumbach said Trump had already cut staff at public health agencies by the time the pandemic hit, severely weakening the nation’s response. Meanwhile, Trump consistently spread disinformation about COVID, providing a preview of his efforts to overturn the election he lost to President Joe Biden. Attempting to deflect blame for a botched COVID response, Trump attacked China and World Health Organization (WHO), even citing The Lancet in a blistering letter to the WHO. The Lancet’s editor stepped in and confirmed that Trump was lying.

    By October 2020, the U.S. had the highest death rate among 18 other high-income countries, both from COVID and other health problems.

    However, Grumbach said the problems exposed by COVID are bigger than Trump. Behind Trump’s bluster and weakness in the face of the virus is a neoliberal ideology that shapes our health care system and sets the U.S. apart from other nations, he said. It’s an ideology that values corporate profits over the lives of the vulnerable and sees health care as a commodity to be bought and sold rather than a human right. In such an environment, public health measures such as masking in public and providing health care to immigrants are subject to polarizing debate, even though they benefit everyone.

    The Lancet’s commission concludes that simply returning to pre-Trump era policies will not be enough to protect health. Grumbach said the entire system needs an “overhaul.” For starters, the U.S. should transition to a single-payer health care system like those set up in nations such as Canada that have better life expectancy. Polling shows that 56 percent of likely voters in the U.S. support Medicare for All, the single-payer proposal championed by Sen. Bernie Sanders and other progressives. Support for a public option that would compete with private insurance is even higher, although many people support both.

    The commission recommendations go far beyond the health care system. A massive mobilization of resources — a Green New Deal — is needed to confront climate change, which poses myriad threats to public health. The U.S. spends 3.4 percent of its GDP on the military, but G7 countries with lower mortality rates only spend an average of 1.4 percent of GDP on defense. If the U.S. reduced foreign intervention and military spending to 1.4 percent of GDP, a massive amount of resources could be redirected to urgent social needs. Additionally, the war on drugs must come to an end, and new investments should be made in communities of color harmed by the criminal legal system and mass incarceration, according to the commission.

    “While the wealthy have thrived, most Americans have lost ground, both economically and medically,” said Steffie Woolhandler, who co-chairs The Lancet’s commission and lectures at Hunter College and Harvard. “The Biden administration must reboot democracy and implement the progressive social and health policies needed to put the country on the road to better health.”

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • By RNZ News

    New Zealand’s medicines regulator Medsafe has provisionally approved the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine against covid-19, with certain conditions placed on the company.

    In its assessment of the vaccine, the regulator met with the Medicine Assessment Advisory Committee (MAAC) for six hours yesterday to receive advice and recommendations.

    In a statement, Medsafe said the MAAC supported the decision.

    However, the provisions mean the company must meet 58 conditions that are placed on it.

    “Of these, 52 relate to requiring additional manufacturing data from the company, for instance as it upscales its manufacturing,” Medsafe group manager Chris James said.

    “Six of the conditions relate to additional clinical information such as regular updates from clinical trials, and ensuring we receive any information on safety concerns from around the world.”

    Medsafe had given Pfizer timeframes to respond on the conditions, and was keeping an open dialogue with the company, he said.

    Same vaccine batch as in Australia
    New Zealand’s Pzifer vaccines are coming in by air and will be from same batch as Australia’s. A batch of 450,000 doses was expected by the end of March.

    The vaccines will go into nine large freezers in Auckland and Christchurch when it arrives on shore, then it will be distributed around the country using cold-chain storage, which keeps it at -70C.

    Director-General of Health Dr Ashley Bloomfield said it would then go into short-term storage at between 2C to 8C, where it would remain usable for up to five days.

    “So the co-ordination of getting appointments and making sure we’re using the vaccine and none is going to waste is a really big effort,” he said.

    After the vaccine has been administered, people will need to wait 30 minutes to mitigate any potential side effects. People will receive two doses, three-to-four weeks apart.

    Asked about the effectiveness of vaccines against new strains of covid-19, Dr Bloomfield was optimistic.

    “So far, certainly with the strain first identified in the UK, the results are promising. It appears to be for the vaccines for the couple of vaccines that have looked at this – that the variant first found in South Africa does have a reduced effectiveness for the vaccines. But it’s still highly effective for the ones they’ve tested,” he said.

    However, he warned the situation could become more complicated over time, as more strains emerge.

    “When people are immunised against the existing strains, the virus will try to find a way to get around the vaccine,” he said.

    PM outlines who will get vaccine first
    Speaking at Waitangi, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern said the vaccine was expected to arrive in the first quarter of the year, but could not put a firm date on when.

    PM Jacinda Ardern
    Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern … every New Zealander will be able to be vaccinated. Image: Dan Cook/RNZ

    Once here, it would be “ready for use, ready for rollout”, with hotel cleaners, security guards and border workers at the airport among those at the front of the queue.

    “Those most at risk of getting Covid-19 will receive the vaccine first, with the broader community accessing the vaccine from the second half of the year,” Ardern said.

    “Subject to expected delivery of the first batch of the vaccine, we will start vaccinating first our border workers and the people they live with. People such as cleaners, the nurses who undertake health checks in MIQ, security staff, customs and border officials, airline staff and hotel workers will be among the first to get the vaccine.”

    It has been approved for people 16 years and older, with two doses 21 days apart.

    Ardern encouraged all to get vaccinated and said people could have confidence in the vaccine and the process followed by Medsafe to approve it.

    “I have said 2021 is the year of the vaccine. It’s a full-year programme we have only just begun. We’re not in a race to be first, but to ensure safe and timely access to vaccines for all New Zealanders,” she said.

    ‘Getting vaccinated will save lives’
    “Getting vaccinated will save lives, and this is the next job of the team of five million.”

    Minister in charge of the Covid-19 Response Chris Hipkins said: “Following Medsafe’s approval, Ministry of Health officials will give advice to the government this week about the ‘decision to use’ the vaccine. This will essentially set out who are most suited to receive the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, such as age ranges.”

    The first Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines were expected to arrive in New Zealand by the end of the first quarter, he said.

    “Once vaccination of our border workers starts, we expect it to be completed within two to three weeks.”

    At a media conference in the afternoon, it was announced a new government advisory group established to identify issues pertinent to vaccine administration was scheduled to meet tomorrow.

    Meetings will be convened by Ministry of Health chief science adviser Ian Town. The scientists will keep ministers informed on the framework used to administer four different vaccines, including who should receive these and under what circumstances.

    Provisional approval is ‘significant milestone’ – Bloomfield
    Medsafe said it would continue to monitor use of the vaccine in the country including analysis of any potential side effects, which it said may include a sore arm or headaches as with other vaccines.

    Medsafe group manager Chris James said a full assessment on the vaccine’s safety, effectiveness and quality – to guide the approval decision – started in November last year.

    “The data was provided on a rolling basis, which streamlined the assessment process and enabled a timely approval without compromising the rigour of the review of the vaccine,” he said.

    “All the data is considered and we then complete a benefit risk assessment, which allows us to balance the benefits of the vaccine against any known risks such as side effects. We have determined there may be some minor side effects such as a painful arm and headaches – these are not uncommon in other vaccines.

    “We have also wanted to ensure the company can manufacture the vaccine to a high quality, and that all batches are consistent.”

    Medsafe’s website includes more information on the vaccine, including the medicine data sheet and full list of ingredients. Other details specifically tailored for consumers will also be published.

    New chapter in NZ response
    In the statement, Dr Bloomfield said the decision brought about a new chapter in New Zealand’s response to the pandemic.

    “I want to reassure New Zealanders we will also be applying the same rigour to all subsequent vaccine applications.”

    In a conference in the afternoon, James said despite the data process being streamlined, it had in no way compromised assessment standards.

    “We have not cut any corners in assessment,” he said.

    The same process would be used with the other three vaccines.

    The Oxford-AstraVeneca vaccine data had been rolling in and an application for approval had been received by Medsafe this week, James said.

    The Janssen vaccine was also progressing well, with data being submitted and an application for approval expected during the second-quarter of the year, he said.

    No Novavax application
    No application had been received for the Novavax vaccine.

    Four separate teams of assessors had been allocated to look at the vaccines.

    James admitted that data received from clinical trials and reports from overseas regulatory partners didn’t confirm that any of the vaccines reduced transmission. Manufacture of the vaccines is primarily used in Belgium, Germany and the US.

    While Dr Bloomfield highlighted the decision as a “significant milestone”, he warned: “There is more work to do, we are not out of the woods yet.”

    “Vaccination is a key next step in our ongoing response to this virus. It’s also a good point to recognise the incredible amount of work New Zealanders have put in to support our successful response to date.”

    Dr Bloomfield said as soon as authorities were confident about the vaccine’s arrival date, it would be made public.

    Previously, he said he was confident that New Zealand would receive a Covid-19 vaccine by the end of March.

    ‘Ready to start’
    “We will be ready to start vaccinating people as soon as a vaccine arrives, and at this time the first vaccine we’re expecting is Pfizer in this quarter,” he said.

    Last week, Pfizer said in a statement it was on track to deliver the first doses to New Zealand in February, and committed to its agreement to supply 1.5m doses during 2021.

    If delays with Pfizer’s vaccine were to occur, New Zealand had other vaccines to fall back on, Bloomfield said. New Zealand has agreements with AstraZeneca, Novavax and Janssen as well for the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.

    Australia approved the Pfizer product last week. BioNTech and Pfizer this month raised their supply goal for this year to 2 billion doses, up from a previous aim of 1.3 billion.

    This article is republished under a community partnership agreement with RNZ.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • By RNZ News

    New Zealand’s medicines regulator Medsafe has provisionally approved the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine against covid-19, with certain conditions placed on the company.

    In its assessment of the vaccine, the regulator met with the Medicine Assessment Advisory Committee (MAAC) for six hours yesterday to receive advice and recommendations.

    In a statement, Medsafe said the MAAC supported the decision.

    However, the provisions mean the company must meet 58 conditions that are placed on it.

    “Of these, 52 relate to requiring additional manufacturing data from the company, for instance as it upscales its manufacturing,” Medsafe group manager Chris James said.

    “Six of the conditions relate to additional clinical information such as regular updates from clinical trials, and ensuring we receive any information on safety concerns from around the world.”

    Medsafe had given Pfizer timeframes to respond on the conditions, and was keeping an open dialogue with the company, he said.

    Same vaccine batch as in Australia
    New Zealand’s Pzifer vaccines are coming in by air and will be from same batch as Australia’s. A batch of 450,000 doses was expected by the end of March.

    The vaccines will go into nine large freezers in Auckland and Christchurch when it arrives on shore, then it will be distributed around the country using cold-chain storage, which keeps it at -70C.

    Director-General of Health Dr Ashley Bloomfield said it would then go into short-term storage at between 2C to 8C, where it would remain usable for up to five days.

    “So the co-ordination of getting appointments and making sure we’re using the vaccine and none is going to waste is a really big effort,” he said.

    After the vaccine has been administered, people will need to wait 30 minutes to mitigate any potential side effects. People will receive two doses, three-to-four weeks apart.

    Asked about the effectiveness of vaccines against new strains of covid-19, Dr Bloomfield was optimistic.

    “So far, certainly with the strain first identified in the UK, the results are promising. It appears to be for the vaccines for the couple of vaccines that have looked at this – that the variant first found in South Africa does have a reduced effectiveness for the vaccines. But it’s still highly effective for the ones they’ve tested,” he said.

    However, he warned the situation could become more complicated over time, as more strains emerge.

    “When people are immunised against the existing strains, the virus will try to find a way to get around the vaccine,” he said.

    PM outlines who will get vaccine first
    Speaking at Waitangi, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern said the vaccine was expected to arrive in the first quarter of the year, but could not put a firm date on when.

    Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern … every New Zealander will be able to be vaccinated. Image: Dan Cook/RNZ

    Once here, it would be “ready for use, ready for rollout”, with hotel cleaners, security guards and border workers at the airport among those at the front of the queue.

    “Those most at risk of getting Covid-19 will receive the vaccine first, with the broader community accessing the vaccine from the second half of the year,” Ardern said.

    “Subject to expected delivery of the first batch of the vaccine, we will start vaccinating first our border workers and the people they live with. People such as cleaners, the nurses who undertake health checks in MIQ, security staff, customs and border officials, airline staff and hotel workers will be among the first to get the vaccine.”

    It has been approved for people 16 years and older, with two doses 21 days apart.

    Ardern encouraged all to get vaccinated and said people could have confidence in the vaccine and the process followed by Medsafe to approve it.

    “I have said 2021 is the year of the vaccine. It’s a full-year programme we have only just begun. We’re not in a race to be first, but to ensure safe and timely access to vaccines for all New Zealanders,” she said.

    ‘Getting vaccinated will save lives’
    “Getting vaccinated will save lives, and this is the next job of the team of five million.”

    Minister in charge of the Covid-19 Response Chris Hipkins said: “Following Medsafe’s approval, Ministry of Health officials will give advice to the government this week about the ‘decision to use’ the vaccine. This will essentially set out who are most suited to receive the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, such as age ranges.”

    The first Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines were expected to arrive in New Zealand by the end of the first quarter, he said.

    “Once vaccination of our border workers starts, we expect it to be completed within two to three weeks.”

    At a media conference in the afternoon, it was announced a new government advisory group established to identify issues pertinent to vaccine administration was scheduled to meet tomorrow.

    Meetings will be convened by Ministry of Health chief science adviser Ian Town. The scientists will keep ministers informed on the framework used to administer four different vaccines, including who should receive these and under what circumstances.

    Provisional approval is ‘significant milestone’ – Bloomfield
    Medsafe said it would continue to monitor use of the vaccine in the country including analysis of any potential side effects, which it said may include a sore arm or headaches as with other vaccines.

    Medsafe group manager Chris James said a full assessment on the vaccine’s safety, effectiveness and quality – to guide the approval decision – started in November last year.

    “The data was provided on a rolling basis, which streamlined the assessment process and enabled a timely approval without compromising the rigour of the review of the vaccine,” he said.

    “All the data is considered and we then complete a benefit risk assessment, which allows us to balance the benefits of the vaccine against any known risks such as side effects. We have determined there may be some minor side effects such as a painful arm and headaches – these are not uncommon in other vaccines.

    “We have also wanted to ensure the company can manufacture the vaccine to a high quality, and that all batches are consistent.”

    Medsafe’s website includes more information on the vaccine, including the medicine data sheet and full list of ingredients. Other details specifically tailored for consumers will also be published.

    New chapter in NZ response
    In the statement, Dr Bloomfield said the decision brought about a new chapter in New Zealand’s response to the pandemic.

    “I want to reassure New Zealanders we will also be applying the same rigour to all subsequent vaccine applications.”

    In a conference in the afternoon, James said despite the data process being streamlined, it had in no way compromised assessment standards.

    “We have not cut any corners in assessment,” he said.

    The same process would be used with the other three vaccines.

    The Oxford-AstraVeneca vaccine data had been rolling in and an application for approval had been received by Medsafe this week, James said.

    The Janssen vaccine was also progressing well, with data being submitted and an application for approval expected during the second-quarter of the year, he said.

    No Novavax application
    No application had been received for the Novavax vaccine.

    Four separate teams of assessors had been allocated to look at the vaccines.

    James admitted that data received from clinical trials and reports from overseas regulatory partners didn’t confirm that any of the vaccines reduced transmission. Manufacture of the vaccines is primarily used in Belgium, Germany and the US.

    While Dr Bloomfield highlighted the decision as a “significant milestone”, he warned: “There is more work to do, we are not out of the woods yet.”

    “Vaccination is a key next step in our ongoing response to this virus. It’s also a good point to recognise the incredible amount of work New Zealanders have put in to support our successful response to date.”

    Dr Bloomfield said as soon as authorities were confident about the vaccine’s arrival date, it would be made public.

    Previously, he said he was confident that New Zealand would receive a Covid-19 vaccine by the end of March.

    ‘Ready to start’
    “We will be ready to start vaccinating people as soon as a vaccine arrives, and at this time the first vaccine we’re expecting is Pfizer in this quarter,” he said.

    Last week, Pfizer said in a statement it was on track to deliver the first doses to New Zealand in February, and committed to its agreement to supply 1.5m doses during 2021.

    If delays with Pfizer’s vaccine were to occur, New Zealand had other vaccines to fall back on, Bloomfield said. New Zealand has agreements with AstraZeneca, Novavax and Janssen as well for the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.

    Australia approved the Pfizer product last week. BioNTech and Pfizer this month raised their supply goal for this year to 2 billion doses, up from a previous aim of 1.3 billion.

    This article is republished under a community partnership agreement with RNZ.

    Print Friendly, PDF & Email

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Indonesia’s President Joko Widodo looks out of a car window after visiting the national heroes’ cemetery in Kalibata. Image: Kompas/Antara file

    By Ihsanuddin in Jakarta

    Jakarta Indonesian Doctor’s Association (IDI) chairperson Slamet Budiarto has challenged a statement by President Joko “Jokowi” Widodo who has claimed that the Indonesian government has succeeded in bringing the coronavirus pandemic under control.

    Budiarto said he was confused about what parameters Widodo was using in making such a statement.

    “I don’t understand why Pak [Mr] Jokowi made such a statement. Perhaps in terms of the economy, I don’t know what the economy is like. What I do know is in terms of health,” Budiarto told Kompas.com.

    Budiarto asserted that in terms of health, the pandemic was clearly “out of control”. This could be seen from the first parameter – the high death rate.

    According to the Johns Hopkins University world covid-19 map, Indonesia’s total number of deaths today is 30,277.

    “Our death rate is the highest – number 1 among Asean countries – both in terms of percentage and number. I expect that by the end of the year there will be 100,000 deaths, by December 2021,” said Budiarto.

    The second parameter used by the IDI, meanwhile, is the rate of new daily infections. On the day of the interview, there were an additional 13,094 new cases.

    More than 1 million cases
    Today the accumulative number of covid-19 cases in Indonesia is 1,089,308.

    The deputy chairperson of the IDI confessed that he did not understand the parameters being used by Jokowi when he said the pandemic was under control.

    “Yes, well perhaps the President has another parameter. For us at the IDI the parameters are the death and infection rate,” said Budiarto.

    Regardless of the parameters being used, Budiarto is asking the government to focus on dealing with the pandemic in terms of health so the death rate can be brought down.

    He said he had already proposed to Health Minister Budi Gunadi Sadikin that covid-19 patients with minor symptoms be treated at home under the care of general practitioners.

    “One doctor can monitor 10 people. Later they could be given incentives,” said Budiarto.

    In this way, hospitals will not be full and treatment rooms in hospitals can be used to focus on patients with medium and serious symptoms.

    ‘Death rate rising’
    “Right now the death rate is rising because hospitals are overloaded”, he said.

    President Widodo said recently that in 2020 and entering 2021 Indonesia had faced a number of difficult challenges. One of these was the covid-19 pandemic which had resulted in a health and economic crisis.

    Widodo, however, also claimed that Indonesia has been able to control both crises well.

    “We are grateful. Indonesia is among the countries that is controlling these two [health and economic] crises well,” said Widodo during a full working assembly session of the Indonesian Communion of Churches (PGI) through the PGI Yakoma YouTube channel last week.

    Translated by James Balowski for IndoLeft News. The original title of the article was “Jokowi Klaim Pandemi Terkendali, IDI Bingung Apa Indikatornya”.

    Print Friendly, PDF & Email

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • By Ihsanuddin in Jakarta

    Jakarta Indonesian Doctor’s Association (IDI) chairperson Slamet Budiarto has challenged a statement by President Joko “Jokowi” Widodo who has claimed that the Indonesian government has succeeded in bringing the coronavirus pandemic under control.

    Budiarto said he was confused about what parameters Widodo was using in making such a statement.

    “I don’t understand why Pak [Mr] Jokowi made such a statement. Perhaps in terms of the economy, I don’t know what the economy is like. What I do know is in terms of health,” Budiarto told Kompas.com.

    Budiarto asserted that in terms of health, the pandemic was clearly “out of control”. This could be seen from the first parameter – the high death rate.

    According to the Johns Hopkins University world covid-19 map, Indonesia’s total number of deaths today is 30,277.

    “Our death rate is the highest – number 1 among Asean countries – both in terms of percentage and number. I expect that by the end of the year there will be 100,000 deaths, by December 2021,” said Budiarto.

    The second parameter used by the IDI, meanwhile, is the rate of new daily infections. On the day of the interview, there were an additional 13,094 new cases.

    More than 1 million cases
    Today the accumulative number of covid-19 cases in Indonesia is 1,089,308.

    The deputy chairperson of the IDI confessed that he did not understand the parameters being used by Jokowi when he said the pandemic was under control.

    “Yes, well perhaps the President has another parameter. For us at the IDI the parameters are the death and infection rate,” said Budiarto.

    Regardless of the parameters being used, Budiarto is asking the government to focus on dealing with the pandemic in terms of health so the death rate can be brought down.

    He said he had already proposed to Health Minister Budi Gunadi Sadikin that covid-19 patients with minor symptoms be treated at home under the care of general practitioners.

    “One doctor can monitor 10 people. Later they could be given incentives,” said Budiarto.

    In this way, hospitals will not be full and treatment rooms in hospitals can be used to focus on patients with medium and serious symptoms.

    ‘Death rate rising’
    “Right now the death rate is rising because hospitals are overloaded”, he said.

    President Widodo said recently that in 2020 and entering 2021 Indonesia had faced a number of difficult challenges. One of these was the covid-19 pandemic which had resulted in a health and economic crisis.

    Widodo, however, also claimed that Indonesia has been able to control both crises well.

    “We are grateful. Indonesia is among the countries that is controlling these two [health and economic] crises well,” said Widodo during a full working assembly session of the Indonesian Communion of Churches (PGI) through the PGI Yakoma YouTube channel last week.

    Translated by James Balowski for IndoLeft News. The original title of the article was “Jokowi Klaim Pandemi Terkendali, IDI Bingung Apa Indikatornya”.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • By RNZ Pacific

    Tourism is set to suffer a sharp decline in French Polynesia as the territory is about to close the border on Wednesday in response to the latest French government decision aimed at slowing the covid-19 coronavirus pandemic.

    At the weekend, France suspended all travel from and to non-European Union destinations except in urgent cases, with the ban being extended to Tahiti on February 3.

    The French High Commission in Pape’ete said in contrast to earlier French lockdowns, this time French Polynesia’s tourism sector would no longer be granted an exemption.

    It also said tourists still in Tahiti were allowed to leave as their travel home was being considered as a reason for an exemption.

    Tahiti-Infos reports that the territory authorities have announced that they would take “emergency” measures over jobs and businesses.

    Tourism and air transport professionals say they are devastated.

    ‘Great threat’ for Polynesians
    Overseas Territories Minister Sébastien Lecornu said in a TNTV television broadcast from Paris that Polynesians faced a “great threat” from three variants of covid-19 with an “intense and rapid spread”.

    Last July, French Polynesia re-opened its borders and abolished mandatory quarantine requirements to boost tourism.

    As the only accessible international tourist destination in the South Pacific, it attracted visitors from mainly France and the United States.

    Since the reopening in July, it has registered 18,000 Covid-19 cases, including 132 deaths.

    During the preceding lockdown, French Polynesia recorded 62 infections and eliminated the virus.

    This article is republished under a community partnership agreement with RNZ.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • By RNZ News

    WorkSafe took enforcement action against four New Zealand managed isolation facilities last year after reviewing their health and safety measures, it has been revealed.

    The agency said the assessments focused on the effectiveness of risk management and controls, the use of protective equipment, worker engagement, participation and representation.

    Letters were issued to the four hotels in relation to the breaches.

    WorkSafe said it was satisfied the matters were attended to promptly and remedied by the hotel management.

    In last year’s nationwide lockdown, WorkSafe said its staff carried out close to 2500 on site assessments related to covid-19.

    Minister for Covid-19 Response Chris Hipkins last week denied standards were slipping at the facilities after a managed isolation staffer lost their job due to an illicit rendezvous.

    Hipkins described the incident at the Grand Millennium in central Auckland as a “one-off” event and said the staffer had been sanctioned.

    However, at the same briefing Hipkins admitted that there was “something going on at the Pullman”.

    There have been three covid-19 cases where guests caught the virus while staying at the Pullman Hotel in Auckland.

    No community cases for fourth day
    There have been no new community cases of covid-19 reported in New Zealand today, with just one case in managed isolation.

    In a statement, the Health Ministry said the number of active cases remains at 71, with one previously reported case now recovered. The total number of confirmed cases is 1948.

    Today’s new case arrived in New Zealand on January 26 from the United Kingdom via Qatar.

    This article is republished under a community partnership agreement with RNZ.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • By RNZ News

    WorkSafe took enforcement action against four New Zealand managed isolation facilities last year after reviewing their health and safety measures, it has been revealed.

    The agency said the assessments focused on the effectiveness of risk management and controls, the use of protective equipment, worker engagement, participation and representation.

    Letters were issued to the four hotels in relation to the breaches.

    WorkSafe said it was satisfied the matters were attended to promptly and remedied by the hotel management.

    In last year’s nationwide lockdown, WorkSafe said its staff carried out close to 2500 on site assessments related to covid-19.

    Minister for Covid-19 Response Chris Hipkins last week denied standards were slipping at the facilities after a managed isolation staffer lost their job due to an illicit rendezvous.

    Hipkins described the incident at the Grand Millennium in central Auckland as a “one-off” event and said the staffer had been sanctioned.

    However, at the same briefing Hipkins admitted that there was “something going on at the Pullman”.

    There have been three covid-19 cases where guests caught the virus while staying at the Pullman Hotel in Auckland.

    No community cases for fourth day
    There have been no new community cases of covid-19 reported in New Zealand today, with just one case in managed isolation.

    In a statement, the Health Ministry said the number of active cases remains at 71, with one previously reported case now recovered. The total number of confirmed cases is 1948.

    Today’s new case arrived in New Zealand on January 26 from the United Kingdom via Qatar.

    This article is republished under a community partnership agreement with RNZ.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • By Katie Todd, RNZ News reporter

    A wine delivery, a note penned on the back of a facemask and a 20-minute bedroom “encounter” have spelled the end of a managed isolation staffer’s job in New Zealand.

    However, Covid-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins refutes there are slipping standards at the border facilities, where authorities are also investigating the transmission of the coronavirus between Pullman Hotel guests.

    The illicit rendezvous with a returnee happened at the Grand Millennium in central Auckland on January 7, and came to light at today’s covid-19 briefing.

    Hipkins said the MIQ worker entered a guest’s room to deliver a bottle of wine after exchanging notes, and stayed for 20 minutes.

    “I didn’t enquire into specifically, the nature of the encounter, but there was a 20 minute encounter. That was enough for me to know it was unacceptable,” he said.

    While the encounter isn’t thought to have put others at risk, it’s been chided as “irresponsible” and “incredibly disappointing” by the head of managed isolation and quarantine Brigadier Jim Bliss, who said the security measures at the hotel meant the incident was detected quickly.

    A hotel manager realised the worker had not returned, and a hotel security manager located them in the room.

    Formal police warning
    Brigadier Bliss said they were immediately sent home and instructed to self-isolate and be tested, before being given a formal written warning by police.

    Both the worker and the returnee had returned negative test results both before and after the incident.

    “We’re not aware of any other reports of situations like this between staff and returnees,” Brigadier Bliss said.

    “There is absolutely no room for complacency for those inside our managed isolation and quarantine facilities.”

    Hipkins said the staffer had been sanctioned, and he also reassured it was a “one-off”.

    “We’re dealing with human beings. We ask everybody to the standards that we put in place. I cannot control the actions of that individual but we absolutely make clear what the rules are and when people breach the rules there are consequences,” he said.

    “Obviously I asked for that to be fully investigated and for appropriate action to be taken. I understand that appropriate action has been taken and that person is no longer working for managed isolation.”

    No new community cases
    There were no new community cases of covid-19 today, however, authorities have revealed there are two other people who they believe caught the virus in the Pullman Hotel – rather than overseas.

    They were staying on the same floor and have the South African variant strain of the virus.

    Hipkins admitted there was “something going on at the Pullman”.

    Director-general of health Ashley Bloomfield said stricter measures were in place until more was known.

    “No new arrivals are going in… a significant restriction on movement outside of rooms for everybody, and no movement outside of rooms once people have had that final test at day 12,” he said.

    In other new rules, those leaving the Pullman Hotel must isolate at home and have a follow up test five days later, while testing of staff is being ramped up and the ventilation systems are being upgraded.

    Pullman guests will only be able to exercise in limited numbers, with people who were on their flight.

    Curbs have also been put on smoking sessions – which are now capped at 10 minutes and a maximum of two people at a time, who are from the same flight.

    No wider restrictions
    Outside isolation, with no new community cases, today’s 1pm briefing granted the green light to thousands of holidaymakers, and concert-goers with Auckland anniversary weekend plans.

    After a frazzling week for organisers, Auckland International Buskers Festival, Chinese New Year Festival and Auckland Folk Festival will continue in the freedom of Alert Level 1.

    Next week, the first of more than 200 Auckland Pride events will kick off across the city.

    The recent cases of covid-19 in Auckland and Northland have been linked to Managed Isolation and Quarantine (MIQ). There is no evidence so far that suggests community transmission, the Ministry of Health said.

    • Call Healthline 0800 358 5453 for advice on when and where to get tested, and remain isolated until you have a negative test result.

    This article is republished under a community partnership agreement with RNZ.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • University of Otago epidemiologist Professor Michael Baker … “we should be thinking about this whole four-week period that [returnees] have.” Image: RNZ/Luke Pilkinton-Ching/O​tago

    By RNZ News

    The New Zealand government should impose a week-long home quarantine for returnees after they have left managed isolation facilities to reduce the risk of community spread, epidemiologist Professor Michael Baker says.

    Three positive cases, a Northland woman and a father and daughter in Auckland, were detected this week after they had left their managed isolation facility – the Pullman Hotel in central Auckland.

    The three people caught the virus from an infectious person staying at the same facility. The initial source was sent to a quarantine facility once they tested positive.

    More than 36,000 tests have been completed in the last week, 22,000 of those in the community, since the positive cases were confirmed. No new cases have been identified.

    University of Otago epidemiologist Professor Michael Baker told RNZ Morning Report this latest scare had renewed his concerns about New Zealand’s border protection process.

    “Personally, I think we should be thinking about this whole four-week period that [returnees] have, the week before they get on the flight overseas, their two weeks in MIQ in New Zealand, and their week after they leave these facilities.

    “Obviously we need to focus more on that whole journey, but I think the week after they leave MIQ… it’s a really good idea to think about requiring a week of home quarantine. If we look at what is done internationally, say Taiwan for example, has used that approach quite a lot and they really do enforce that period, people are required to stay at home, it’s followed up and there are huge fines if you don’t adhere to that requirement.”

    Returnees stay in one place
    While he admits there are practicality problems associated with that, Professor Baker said the main point was that returnees stayed in one place, reducing the risk of another scenario like the one this week.

    “One of the really concerning numbers is the fact that we’ve increased by about threefold the number of positive being detected in our MIQ facilities over the last few months, this has just crept up steadily and it reflects the fact that the pandemic is getting much more intense overseas, and we’re seeing more transmissible variants.

    “So I would say the [government’s] focus really needs to shift offshore and thinking about the ways we can reduce the number of infected people arriving here.”

    Despite the scare, Professor Baker said he was confident widespread transmission had been avoided.

    “This is not like the Auckland August outbreak, where we had unknown chains of transmission in the community, these are very clearly defined breaches of our MIQ system and we know who they are, their contacts have been followed up, so it’s a different situation.

    “So I’m reasonably optimistic, but I guess we just have to see more results.”

    Professor Baker said one reason why there had not been widespread transmission could be because only about one in five cases transmit it to other people.

    This article is republished under a community partnership agreement with RNZ.

    Print Friendly, PDF & Email

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • By RNZ News

    The New Zealand government should impose a week-long home quarantine for returnees after they have left managed isolation facilities to reduce the risk of community spread, epidemiologist Professor Michael Baker says.

    Three positive cases, a Northland woman and a father and daughter in Auckland, were detected this week after they had left their managed isolation facility – the Pullman Hotel in central Auckland.

    The three people caught the virus from an infectious person staying at the same facility. The initial source was sent to a quarantine facility once they tested positive.

    More than 36,000 tests have been completed in the last week, 22,000 of those in the community, since the positive cases were confirmed. No new cases have been identified.

    University of Otago epidemiologist Professor Michael Baker told RNZ Morning Report this latest scare had renewed his concerns about New Zealand’s border protection process.

    “Personally, I think we should be thinking about this whole four-week period that [returnees] have, the week before they get on the flight overseas, their two weeks in MIQ in New Zealand, and their week after they leave these facilities.

    “Obviously we need to focus more on that whole journey, but I think the week after they leave MIQ… it’s a really good idea to think about requiring a week of home quarantine. If we look at what is done internationally, say Taiwan for example, has used that approach quite a lot and they really do enforce that period, people are required to stay at home, it’s followed up and there are huge fines if you don’t adhere to that requirement.”

    Returnees stay in one place
    While he admits there are practicality problems associated with that, Professor Baker said the main point was that returnees stayed in one place, reducing the risk of another scenario like the one this week.

    “One of the really concerning numbers is the fact that we’ve increased by about threefold the number of positive being detected in our MIQ facilities over the last few months, this has just crept up steadily and it reflects the fact that the pandemic is getting much more intense overseas, and we’re seeing more transmissible variants.

    “So I would say the [government’s] focus really needs to shift offshore and thinking about the ways we can reduce the number of infected people arriving here.”

    Despite the scare, Professor Baker said he was confident widespread transmission had been avoided.

    “This is not like the Auckland August outbreak, where we had unknown chains of transmission in the community, these are very clearly defined breaches of our MIQ system and we know who they are, their contacts have been followed up, so it’s a different situation.

    “So I’m reasonably optimistic, but I guess we just have to see more results.”

    Professor Baker said one reason why there had not been widespread transmission could be because only about one in five cases transmit it to other people.

    This article is republished under a community partnership agreement with RNZ.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • By RNZ News

    The two new cases of covid-19 confirmed yesterday in New Zealand are the South African variant and initial results show they are connected to the Northland case at the Pullman Hotel.

    This morning the Director-General of Health, Dr Ashley Bloomfield, confirmed to Covid-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins that preliminary genomic sequencing results showed a link.

    The pair completed their managed isolation in the same facility and at the same time as the Northland community case.

    They left quarantine at the Pullman Hotel on January 15 and have been living in North Auckland. They will now isolate in the Jet Park quarantine facility.

    Hipkins said it was not an exact match but what they call “in the same tree”, so it is highly likely they are connected.

    He says someone with the virus was picked up from the Pullman and taken to the Jet Park Hotel which appears to be the source.

    Cause of the spread
    Hipkins says something happened at the Pullman to cause the spread and they are now trying to work out whether it was something like an interaction in the lift or exercise area.

    People who visited locations of interest in Auckland or anyone with symptoms, are asked to isolate and call Healthline 0800 611 116 to arrange a test and remain isolated until they receive their result.

    The list of locations is here.

    RNZ’s Live Blog with updates on the covid outbreak is here.

    This article is republished under a community partnership agreement with RNZ.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • By RNZ News

    The two new cases of covid-19 confirmed yesterday in New Zealand are the South African variant and initial results show they are connected to the Northland case at the Pullman Hotel.

    This morning the Director-General of Health, Dr Ashley Bloomfield, confirmed to Covid-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins that preliminary genomic sequencing results showed a link.

    The pair completed their managed isolation in the same facility and at the same time as the Northland community case.

    They left quarantine at the Pullman Hotel on January 15 and have been living in North Auckland. They will now isolate in the Jet Park quarantine facility.

    Hipkins said it was not an exact match but what they call “in the same tree”, so it is highly likely they are connected.

    He says someone with the virus was picked up from the Pullman and taken to the Jet Park Hotel which appears to be the source.

    Cause of the spread
    Hipkins says something happened at the Pullman to cause the spread and they are now trying to work out whether it was something like an interaction in the lift or exercise area.

    People who visited locations of interest in Auckland or anyone with symptoms, are asked to isolate and call Healthline 0800 611 116 to arrange a test and remain isolated until they receive their result.

    The list of locations is here.

    RNZ’s Live Blog with updates on the covid outbreak is here.

    This article is republished under a community partnership agreement with RNZ.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • By Lulu Mark in Port Moresby

    Papua New Guinea’s biggest hospital is straining to provide medical services to the growing population of the capital Port Moresby – with an estimated growth rate of 3 percent annually, a medical executive says.

    Port Moresby General Hospital chief executive officer Dr Paki Molumi said overcrowding, especially in the emergency department, was a big concern.

    “The population increases at 3 percent a year yet services remain the same,” Dr Molumi said.

    “There is a discrepancy between demand and supply which is reflected by the overcrowding.”

    He said sometimes patients died while waiting to be attended to because of the long queue.

    “The hospital serves over a million people in Port Moresby, Central and Gulf,” he said.

    “Limited staff are struggling to meet the demand which reduces the quality of care given to a sick person.

    Specialised care needed
    “As a specialist hospital, it should be concentrating on delivering specialised care so that our people do not need to go overseas for that.

    “Instead, we are taking on primary and secondary care as we do not have a separate hospital for the growing population in the city.”

    The city has an estimated population of 385,000.

    Dr Molumi was responding to a complaint on social media about a woman being admitted at the emergency ward on Saturday but was not attended to until Monday night.

    “There is no hospital for Central and the Gulf Hospital cannot offer adequate services,” he said.

    “Hence, all come to the Port Moresby General Hospital.

    “The overcrowding at the emergency department and outpatients is a reflection of a defective health service we are offering to our people.”

    Dr Molumi sees a separate hospital for the National Capital District Health Authority and Central to look after primary and secondary healthcare, leaving Port Moresby General Hospital to concentrate on referrals as the best solution to the overcrowding.

    Right now, he said, the hospital was dealing with “everything” which was putting a strain on existing resources.

    Lulu Mark is a reporter for The National. Asia Pacific Report republishes The National articles with permission.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • By Lulu Mark in Port Moresby

    Papua New Guinea’s biggest hospital is straining to provide medical services to the growing population of the capital Port Moresby – with an estimated growth rate of 3 percent annually, a medical executive says.

    Port Moresby General Hospital chief executive officer Dr Paki Molumi said overcrowding, especially in the emergency department, was a big concern.

    “The population increases at 3 percent a year yet services remain the same,” Dr Molumi said.

    “There is a discrepancy between demand and supply which is reflected by the overcrowding.”

    He said sometimes patients died while waiting to be attended to because of the long queue.

    “The hospital serves over a million people in Port Moresby, Central and Gulf,” he said.

    “Limited staff are struggling to meet the demand which reduces the quality of care given to a sick person.

    Specialised care needed
    “As a specialist hospital, it should be concentrating on delivering specialised care so that our people do not need to go overseas for that.

    “Instead, we are taking on primary and secondary care as we do not have a separate hospital for the growing population in the city.”

    The city has an estimated population of 385,000.

    Dr Molumi was responding to a complaint on social media about a woman being admitted at the emergency ward on Saturday but was not attended to until Monday night.

    “There is no hospital for Central and the Gulf Hospital cannot offer adequate services,” he said.

    “Hence, all come to the Port Moresby General Hospital.

    “The overcrowding at the emergency department and outpatients is a reflection of a defective health service we are offering to our people.”

    Dr Molumi sees a separate hospital for the National Capital District Health Authority and Central to look after primary and secondary healthcare, leaving Port Moresby General Hospital to concentrate on referrals as the best solution to the overcrowding.

    Right now, he said, the hospital was dealing with “everything” which was putting a strain on existing resources.

    Lulu Mark is a reporter for The National. Asia Pacific Report republishes The National articles with permission.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • There was a “system failure” in the UK’s handling of the coronavirus pandemic, a public health expert has said.

    Professor Linda Bauld said the UK was underprepared for a virus like Covid-19, and Europe failed to learn from how south-east Asian countries responded to the pandemic.

    She said some of the decisions made in the UK “directly contributed” to the second wave, as she described the failure to ramp up contact tracing in March as a “fundamental mistake”.

    Prof Bauld, professor of public health at the University of Edinburgh, was speaking after the number of UK coronavirus deaths passed 100,000.

    She told BBC Radio Scotland’s Good Morning Scotland programme on Wednesday:

    I think we’re going to look back on this as a system failure, I think that we came into this pandemic underprepared for a virus like this.

    We at UK level chose not to follow the model of south-east Asian countries, and during the last year, the last 11 months, the response and some of the decisions that have been made have certainly directly contributed particularly to the second wave.

    I think it’s really incredibly difficult for people to hear, for example, a quarter of deaths that we’ve seen in this pandemic have occurred really over the last month or so.

    She said Europe and the UK could have recognised from the experiences of Asian countries that viruses move between individuals and spread around the world by travel.

    Prof Bauld said one thing the UK and Europe “really struggled” with was the closure of borders, which happened very quickly in countries like Vietnam, Taiwan, South Korea and within China.

    Airport arrivals hall
    Prof Bauld said the UK needs to be ready to respond to more new variants of the virus (Kirsty O’Connor/PA)

    She said:

    The second thing was the importance of testing, testing infrastructure, which those countries had, they were ready with PPE and they also know the really essential importance of contact tracing, test, trace, isolate, protect, and they already had those systems but they increased them at scale.

    We have a legacy of contact tracing but we paused our response in March.

    Australia and New Zealand benefited hugely. They really followed the model of those countries and we didn’t unfortunately until later in the pandemic.

    Prof Bauld said the UK had been preparing for a pandemic flu rather than a Sars-type virus, and a clear decision in “pandemic preparedness” for flu is that once infection levels get too high, contact tracing is not viable.

    HEALTH Coronavirus Deaths
    (PA Graphics)

    She said that is why there was a “strategic decision” in March not to ramp up that system.

    Prof Bauld also said it is important not to over-emphasise the role of the new, more rapidly spreading variant in the current situation.

    She said:

    It absolutely has made what was a bad situation much worse, but I think the Government could not necessarily have predicted the virus would behave exactly this way, but I think they could have predicted there might have been a problem of that kind.

    So the preventable deaths we’ve seen in November, December and January are a combination of two things, the fact that we made mistakes in the summer and didn’t get ready for a second wave and then this variant on top of it.

    As we look ahead we need to prevent more of these different lineages of the virus coming into the country, while also just being prepared for the fact that we might see home-grown variants like this kind, and that means being ready to tweak our vaccines and respond to that in future.

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • New Zealand’s Covid-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins has revealed that 14 close contacts of the Northland community case have returned negative test results.

    Yesterday he announced two close contacts – her husband and hair dresser – were negative.

    In his tweet, Hipkins described the news as “encouraging”.

    However, New Zealand should be ready to move alert levels if there is an outbreak of the new covid-19 South African variant, says a leading modeller of the pandemic.

    Auckland University professor Shaun Hendy said more data on the Northland community case was expected soon.

    He compared the Northland community case with the Auckland August cluster but said the new covid variants were more transmissible meaning if an infected person could infect two more last year, this year they might infect three.

    Accummulating evidence
    There was accumulating evidence that the new variant spread far more easily, he said.

    On 12 August 2020, Auckland moved to alert level 3, while the rest of the country moved to level 2.

    “That just means the sort of restrictions we used last year in August in Auckland wouldn’t be as effective in containing the outbreak.”

    However, Dr Hendy said with this case it was “highly unlikely” the country would need to move alert levels the same way; partly because the source of last year’s transmission was not identified.

    The positive case of the Northland woman can be traced back to the MIQ facility.

    “The chances of there being a large number of cases at this stage that we don’t know about or that we’re unable to track are quite slim.”

    He said it was not inevitable that there would be leaks at the border.

    ‘We need to be prepared’
    “We need to be prepared for another Auckland August situation.”

    Dr Hendy suggested another test five days after a person left an MIQ facility.

    Australia suspended quarantine-free travel for New Zealanders for at least 72 hours after confirmation yesterday New Zealand has a case of the South African variant of covid-19.

    PM Jacinda Ardern said she had advised her Australian counterpart Scott Morrison that this country had confidence in its systems and processes.

    However, she said it was Australia’s decision as to how it managed its borders.

    This article is republished under a community partnership agreement with RNZ.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • By RNZ News

    New Zealand’s Covid-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins has revealed that 14 close contacts of the Northland community case have returned negative test results.

    Hipkins said in a tweet today three more test results were pending.

    Yesterday he announced two close contacts – her husband and hair dresser – were negative.

    In his tweet, Hipkins described the news as “encouraging”.

    However, New Zealand should be ready to move alert levels if there is an outbreak of the new covid-19 South African variant, says a leading modeller of the pandemic.

    Auckland University professor Shaun Hendy said more data on the Northland community case was expected soon.

    He compared the Northland community case with the Auckland August cluster but said the new covid variants were more transmissible meaning if an infected person could infect two more last year, this year they might infect three.

    Accummulating evidence
    There was accumulating evidence that the new variant spread far more easily, he said.

    On 12 August 2020, Auckland moved to alert level 3, while the rest of the country moved to level 2.

    “That just means the sort of restrictions we used last year in August in Auckland wouldn’t be as effective in containing the outbreak.”

    However, Dr Hendy said with this case it was “highly unlikely” the country would need to move alert levels the same way; partly because the source of last year’s transmission was not identified.

    The positive case of the Northland woman can be traced back to the MIQ facility.

    “The chances of there being a large number of cases at this stage that we don’t know about or that we’re unable to track are quite slim.”

    He said it was not inevitable that there would be leaks at the border.

    ‘We need to be prepared’
    “We need to be prepared for another Auckland August situation.”

    Dr Hendy suggested another test five days after a person left an MIQ facility.

    Australia suspended quarantine-free travel for New Zealanders for at least 72 hours after confirmation yesterday New Zealand has a case of the South African variant of covid-19.

    PM Jacinda Ardern said she had advised her Australian counterpart Scott Morrison that this country had confidence in its systems and processes.

    However, she said it was Australia’s decision as to how it managed its borders.

    This article is republished under a community partnership agreement with RNZ.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • NZ’s Director-General of Health Dr Ashley Bloomfield … “We are working on the assumption this is a positive case and that it is a more transmissible variant.” Image: Dom Thomas/RNZ

    By RNZ News

    The latest community coronavirus case in New Zealand travelled across Northland before her positive test result, but was scrupulous about using the government’s Covid Tracer app, health authorities have revealed.

    The latest probable case is a 56-year-old woman who was released from isolation at the Pullman Hotel in Auckland after testing negative twice during her stay.

    Covid-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins and Director-General of Health Dr Ashley Bloomfield held a media conference about the probable community case this afternoon.

    The woman travelled around Northland after leaving isolation, including Helensville, Mangawhai and Dargaville. Dr Bloomfield said she “almost definitely” visited Whangārei.

    Today’s NZ covid-19 media conference. Video: RNZ News

    Dr Bloomfield said health authorities were investigating the positive test result. She had travelled in Spain and the Netherlands for about four months late last year with family members, some of whom later tested positive for covid-19.

    She travelled to New Zealand from London, arriving in Auckland on December 30.

    She returned two negative tests while in isolation, and had no symptoms while in isolation.

    Returned home in Northland
    After leaving isolation on January 13 she returned to her home in Northland, where she lives with her husband. He has reported no symptoms.

    Dr Bloomfield said she felt very mild symptoms on January 15, but did not associate them with covid. As her symptoms worsened, she got tested at a community testing facility.

    The woman is well enough to be at home and has not needed hospital care.

    A thorough interview has suggested she has four close contacts. They are isolated and are talking to health officials and have been tested.

    Dr Bloomfield said the four close contacts include her household contact and others who she had a close encounter within a retail setting. She visited restaurants, cafes and retail outlets during her travels.

    The woman did not attend large events or mass gatherings, DrBloomfield said.

    Own vehicle for travel
    It is understood the couple travelled in their own vehicle around Northland and did not use public transport.

    The Ministry of Health is wanting higher rates of testing in Northland, and this evening set up testing until 8pm at Winger Crescent in Kamo.

    Bloomfield said the result indicated it was a new case, but further tests were looking at whether it could be historical, and if it was a variant.

    “We are working on the assumption this is a positive case and that it is a more transmissible variant.”

    Dr Bloomfield said it was possible – but unlikely – to be a very long incubation period. He said investigations were underway to determine if she possibly contracted the virus while at the managed-isolation facility.

    ‘We are casting the net wide’
    Hipkins said the origin of the infection was not yet known. Further tests had been carried out, but the results are not out yet.

    More than 600 people who stayed in managed isolation at the Pullman Hotel this month have been asked to stay at home and get tested for covid-19.

    All staff working at the Pullman Hotel will also be re-tested.

    Covid-19 Response Minister Chris HipkinsCovid-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins … “We are also casting the net wide to ensure we contain any potential community transmission.” Image: Dom Thomas/RNZ

    Hipkins said the woman had been tracing her movements and scanning the QR code wherever she went. Dr Bloomfield said this allowed authorities to rapidly identify what places she had been to.

    “In this case we are also casting the net wide to ensure we contain any potential community transmission. This is precautionary but vital as part of our response.”

    He said she visited several locations and the Ministry of Health will release details of these on its website as soon as it has all the details.

    It is asking people who have been at those locations to stay at home and call Healthline about the right time to get a test.

    ‘A tricky virus’
    Dr Bloomfield said anyone who was symptomatic, either in Northland or around the country, should get a test.

    “This is a reminder to all of us that the pandemic continues, this is a tricky virus and it behoves all of us to get with the programme and do the things we all know need to be done to keep New Zealanders safe – wash your hands, scan in religiously and stay home if you’re unwell and get a test and isolate until you receive a negative result.”

    Dr Bloomfield said more PPE and lab supplies had been sent to Northland and told district health boards to expect increased testing. Public health units across the country are on stand-by to support Northland.

    An increasing proportion of positive tests in isolation were historical infections, Dr Bloomfield said.

    If confirmed, it will be the first community case since November.

    This article is republished under a community partnership agreement with RNZ.

    Print Friendly, PDF & Email

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • By RNZ News

    The latest community coronavirus case in New Zealand travelled across Northland before her positive test result, but was scrupulous about using the government’s Covid Tracer app, health authorities have revealed.

    The latest probable case is a 56-year-old woman who was released from isolation at the Pullman Hotel in Auckland after testing negative twice during her stay.

    Covid-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins and Director-General of Health Dr Ashley Bloomfield held a media conference about the probable community case this afternoon.

    The woman travelled around Northland after leaving isolation, including Helensville, Mangawhai and Dargaville. Dr Bloomfield said she “almost definitely” visited Whangārei.

    Today’s NZ covid-19 media conference. Video: RNZ News

    Dr Bloomfield said health authorities were investigating the positive test result. She had travelled in Spain and the Netherlands for about four months late last year with family members, some of whom later tested positive for covid-19.

    She travelled to New Zealand from London, arriving in Auckland on December 30.

    She returned two negative tests while in isolation, and had no symptoms while in isolation.

    Returned home in Northland
    After leaving isolation on January 13 she returned to her home in Northland, where she lives with her husband. He has reported no symptoms.

    Dr Bloomfield said she felt very mild symptoms on January 15, but did not associate them with covid. As her symptoms worsened, she got tested at a community testing facility.

    The woman is well enough to be at home and has not needed hospital care.

    A thorough interview has suggested she has four close contacts. They are isolated and are talking to health officials and have been tested.

    Dr Bloomfield said the four close contacts include her household contact and others who she had a close encounter within a retail setting. She visited restaurants, cafes and retail outlets during her travels.

    The woman did not attend large events or mass gatherings, DrBloomfield said.

    Own vehicle for travel
    It is understood the couple travelled in their own vehicle around Northland and did not use public transport.

    The Ministry of Health is wanting higher rates of testing in Northland, and this evening set up testing until 8pm at Winger Crescent in Kamo.

    Bloomfield said the result indicated it was a new case, but further tests were looking at whether it could be historical, and if it was a variant.

    “We are working on the assumption this is a positive case and that it is a more transmissible variant.”

    Dr Bloomfield said it was possible – but unlikely – to be a very long incubation period. He said investigations were underway to determine if she possibly contracted the virus while at the managed-isolation facility.

    ‘We are casting the net wide’
    Hipkins said the origin of the infection was not yet known. Further tests had been carried out, but the results are not out yet.

    More than 600 people who stayed in managed isolation at the Pullman Hotel this month have been asked to stay at home and get tested for covid-19.

    All staff working at the Pullman Hotel will also be re-tested.

    Covid-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins
    Covid-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins … “We are also casting the net wide to ensure we contain any potential community transmission.” Image: Dom Thomas/RNZ

    Hipkins said the woman had been tracing her movements and scanning the QR code wherever she went. Dr Bloomfield said this allowed authorities to rapidly identify what places she had been to.

    “In this case we are also casting the net wide to ensure we contain any potential community transmission. This is precautionary but vital as part of our response.”

    He said she visited several locations and the Ministry of Health will release details of these on its website as soon as it has all the details.

    It is asking people who have been at those locations to stay at home and call Healthline about the right time to get a test.

    ‘A tricky virus’
    Dr Bloomfield said anyone who was symptomatic, either in Northland or around the country, should get a test.

    “This is a reminder to all of us that the pandemic continues, this is a tricky virus and it behoves all of us to get with the programme and do the things we all know need to be done to keep New Zealanders safe – wash your hands, scan in religiously and stay home if you’re unwell and get a test and isolate until you receive a negative result.”

    Dr Bloomfield said more PPE and lab supplies had been sent to Northland and told district health boards to expect increased testing. Public health units across the country are on stand-by to support Northland.

    An increasing proportion of positive tests in isolation were historical infections, Dr Bloomfield said.

    If confirmed, it will be the first community case since November.

    This article is republished under a community partnership agreement with RNZ.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • By Lulu Mark in Port Moresby

    In spite of Papua New Guinea’s mandatory mask-wearing requirement under the National Pandemic Act 2020, many public servants attending a dedication service in Port Moresby have failed to wear one.

    They were issued masks before entering the Sir John Guise Indoor Complex but took them off once inside.

    Pandemic Controller David Manning has again emphasised that the mandatory wearing of masks is one of the 11 measures to stop the spread of the covid-19 which some people were openly defying.

    The national covid-19 total is 835. Manning said that in spite of no new cases being reported in the past 24 hours, people must remain vigilant.

    The rules are:

    • NO person shall be permitted entry to, or otherwise remain within any enclosed space within an establishment, unless the person is wearing a mask or face covering, in a manner which covers their mouth, nose and chin;
    • NO person shall be permitted entry into or otherwise remain on public transport unless the person is wearing a mask or face covering in a manner which covers their mouth, nose and chin;
    • NO person shall be permitted entry into an aircraft anywhere in PNG unless the person is wearing a mask or face covering;
    • NO person shall remove their mask or face covering while on an aircraft in PNG; and,
    • ALL persons working in a designated market, establishment or on a public transport in which they interact in person with customers, clients or work in an enclosed space with other colleagues must wear masks at all times.

    Face masks ‘a must’
    Manning stressed that business and government departments and agencies must ensure that all employees must wear mask or face coverings.

    But at the public service dedication service on Monday, the majority of the people who sat side by side were not wearing masks.

    An officer from the Department of Community Development was seen handing out masks to public servants entering the Sir John Guise Stadium.

    But once inside, some removed their masks.

    Those exempted from the measures include:

    • CHILDREN under 12;
    • PERSONS with underlying medical conditions which inhibit their ability to wear a mask, including persons with physical or mental illness or impairment or disability;
    • PERSONS who are unable to place or remove a facemask or face covering without assistance;
    • PERSONS undergoing dental treatment or medical care to the extent that the procedure requires that no face covering may be worn; and
    • PERSONS participating in sporting activities.

    Manning said penalties would be imposed on those who failed to wear masks.

    Asia Pacific Report republishes The National articles with permission.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • By Lulu Mark in Port Moresby

    In spite of Papua New Guinea’s mandatory mask-wearing requirement under the National Pandemic Act 2020, many public servants attending a dedication service in Port Moresby have failed to wear one.

    They were issued masks before entering the Sir John Guise Indoor Complex but took them off once inside.

    Pandemic Controller David Manning has again emphasised that the mandatory wearing of masks is one of the 11 measures to stop the spread of the covid-19 which some people were openly defying.

    The national covid-19 total is 843.

    The rules are:

    • NO person shall be permitted entry to, or otherwise remain within any enclosed space within an establishment, unless the person is wearing a mask or face covering, in a manner which covers their mouth, nose and chin;
    • NO person shall be permitted entry into or otherwise remain on public transport unless the person is wearing a mask or face covering in a manner which covers their mouth, nose and chin;
    • NO person shall be permitted entry into an aircraft anywhere in PNG unless the person is wearing a mask or face covering;
    • NO person shall remove their mask or face covering while on an aircraft in PNG; and,
    • ALL persons working in a designated market, establishment or on a public transport in which they interact in person with customers, clients or work in an enclosed space with other colleagues must wear masks at all times.

    Face masks ‘a must’
    Manning stressed that business and government departments and agencies must ensure that all employees must wear mask or face coverings.

    But at the public service dedication service on Monday, the majority of the people who sat side by side were not wearing masks.

    An officer from the Department of Community Development was seen handing out masks to public servants entering the Sir John Guise Stadium.

    But once inside, some removed their masks.

    Those exempted from the measures include:

    • CHILDREN under 12;
    • PERSONS with underlying medical conditions which inhibit their ability to wear a mask, including persons with physical or mental illness or impairment or disability;
    • PERSONS who are unable to place or remove a facemask or face covering without assistance;
    • PERSONS undergoing dental treatment or medical care to the extent that the procedure requires that no face covering may be worn; and
    • PERSONS participating in sporting activities.

    Manning said penalties would be imposed on those who failed to wear masks.

    Asia Pacific Report republishes The National articles with permission.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • By RNZ News

    An independent panel says Chinese officials could have applied public health measures more forcefully in January to curb the initial covid-19 outbreak, and criticised the World Health Organisation (WHO) for not declaring an international emergency until 30 January.

    The experts reviewing the global handling of the pandemic, led by former New Zealand Prime Minister Helen Clark and former Liberian President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, called for reforms to the Geneva-based United Nations agency.

    Their interim report was published hours after the WHO’s top emergency expert, Dr Mike Ryan, said global deaths from covid-19 were expected to top 100,000 per week “very soon”.

    “What is clear to the Panel is that public health measures could have been applied more forcefully by local and national health authorities in China in January,” the report said, referring to the initial outbreak of the new disease in the central city of Wuhan, in Hubei province.

    As evidence emerged of human-to-human transmission, “in far too many countries, this signal was ignored”, it added.

    Specifically, it questioned why the WHO’s Emergency Committee did not meet until the third week of January and did not declare an international emergency until its second meeting on 30 January.

    “Although the term pandemic is neither used nor defined in the International Health Regulations (2005), its use does serve to focus attention on the gravity of a health event. It was not until 11 March that WHO used the term,” the report said.

    ‘Not fit for purpose’
    “The global pandemic alert system is not fit for purpose”, it said. “The World Health Organisation has been underpowered to do the job.”

    Under President Donald Trump, the United States has accused the WHO of being “China-centric”, which the agency denies.

    European countries led by France and Germany have pushed for addressing the WHO’s shortcomings on funding, governance and legal powers.

    The panel called for a “global reset” and said that it would make recommendations in a final report to health ministers from the 194 member states of WHO in May.

    This article is republished under a community partnership agreement with RNZ.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • Indonesian President Joko Widodo … response to the covid-19 pandemic “weak, with low testing and tracing rates, and little transparency”. Image: IndoLeft/CNN Indonesia

    Pacific Media Watch newsdesk

    Human Rights Watch (HRW) has criticised the Indonesian government of President Joko “Jokowi” Widodo for its weak health response to covid-19 which has brought Indonesia to its knees since March 2020, reports CNN Indonesia.

    The assessment is based on Indonesia’s poor rates of testing and tracing and minimal transparency. Furthermore, the government was both slow and incompetent in dealing with the covid-19 pandemic.

    In its annual World Report 2021 the human rights organisation highlighted that under President Widodo’s leadership the government had instead focused on regulations related to labour which harmed the rights of workers and damaged the environment.

    Yet the epidemic itself has killed at least 17,000 Indonesians and resulted in around 2.6 million people losing their jobs.

    “The response of President Joko ‘Jokowi’ Widodo’s government to the covid-19 pandemic was weak, with low testing and tracing rates, and little transparency,” the report said.

    “The impact of the virus has been devastating, killing at least 17,000 people, and leading to the loss of 2.6 million jobs.”

    HRW Asia director Brad Adams said that the Widodo government never made dealing with the pandemic its top priority and focusing instead on passing laws that harmed workers and the environment.

    Pandemic not top priority
    “The Jokowi government never seemed to make the pandemic its top priority, focusing instead on passing a business-friendly law that harm workers and the environment”, said Adams as quoted from the HRW website by CNN Indonesia.

    According to Adams, which creating jobs and planning economic recovery are important goals especially in a pandemic, “but they should not come at the expense of fighting the virus or protecting the hard-fought rights of workers”.

    Adams said that the HRW also highlighted violations of the rights of women, religious minorities and lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) groups.

    There were many cases of Muslim groups who threatened religious minority groups found in Indonesia but the government’s response this kind of intimidation was still very minimal.

    Adams said that according to HRW’s records, Indonesian police arrested at least 38 people for blasphemy across 16 provinces in 2020.

    The Supreme Court also rejected a petition to revoke the joint ministerial decree on houses of worship, which has been used to close down hundreds of churches since 2006.

    “Jokowi came to office promising progressive reforms, but in 2020 he seemed to give up any remaining intentions he had to protect rights and the most vulnerable,” Adams said.

    Limited access to Papuan provinces
    Indonesia, according to the HRW report, has also continued to limit access for international rights monitors and journalists to visit Papua and West Papua provinces, which have long been affected by unrest and rights violations.

    “It’s not too late for him to take bold steps to prioritise public health, reinstate labor and environmental protections, and protect free expression. His last years in office will define his legacy”, concluded Adams.

    Translated by James Balowski for IndoLeft News. The original title of the article was “HRW: Respons Jokowi Lemah terhadap Penanganan Pandemi Corona”.

    Print Friendly, PDF & Email

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Pacific Media Watch newsdesk

    Human Rights Watch (HRW) has criticised the Indonesian government of President Joko “Jokowi” Widodo for its weak health response to covid-19 which has brought Indonesia to its knees since March 2020, reports CNN Indonesia.

    The assessment is based on Indonesia’s poor rates of testing and tracing and minimal transparency. Furthermore, the government was both slow and incompetent in dealing with the covid-19 pandemic.

    In its annual World Report 2021 the human rights organisation highlighted that under President Widodo’s leadership the government had instead focused on regulations related to labour which harmed the rights of workers and damaged the environment.

    Yet the epidemic itself has killed at least 17,000 Indonesians and resulted in around 2.6 million people losing their jobs.

    “The response of President Joko ‘Jokowi’ Widodo’s government to the covid-19 pandemic was weak, with low testing and tracing rates, and little transparency,” the report said.

    “The impact of the virus has been devastating, killing at least 17,000 people, and leading to the loss of 2.6 million jobs.”

    HRW Asia director Brad Adams said that the Widodo government never made dealing with the pandemic its top priority and focusing instead on passing laws that harmed workers and the environment.

    Pandemic not top priority
    “The Jokowi government never seemed to make the pandemic its top priority, focusing instead on passing a business-friendly law that harm workers and the environment”, said Adams as quoted from the HRW website by CNN Indonesia.

    According to Adams, which creating jobs and planning economic recovery are important goals especially in a pandemic, “but they should not come at the expense of fighting the virus or protecting the hard-fought rights of workers”.

    Adams said that the HRW also highlighted violations of the rights of women, religious minorities and lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) groups.

    There were many cases of Muslim groups who threatened religious minority groups found in Indonesia but the government’s response this kind of intimidation was still very minimal.

    Adams said that according to HRW’s records, Indonesian police arrested at least 38 people for blasphemy across 16 provinces in 2020.

    The Supreme Court also rejected a petition to revoke the joint ministerial decree on houses of worship, which has been used to close down hundreds of churches since 2006.

    “Jokowi came to office promising progressive reforms, but in 2020 he seemed to give up any remaining intentions he had to protect rights and the most vulnerable,” Adams said.

    Limited access to Papuan provinces
    Indonesia, according to the HRW report, has also continued to limit access for international rights monitors and journalists to visit Papua and West Papua provinces, which have long been affected by unrest and rights violations.

    “It’s not too late for him to take bold steps to prioritise public health, reinstate labor and environmental protections, and protect free expression. His last years in office will define his legacy”, concluded Adams.

    Translated by James Balowski for IndoLeft News. The original title of the article was “HRW: Respons Jokowi Lemah terhadap Penanganan Pandemi Corona”.

     

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • An expatriate is admitted to Pacific International Hospital …

    By The National in Port Moresby

    An expatriate who tested positive for the covid-19 coronavirus last week has been admitted to a private hospital in the Papua New Guinea capital of Port Moresby, an official has confirmed.

    Pacific International Hospital (PIH) chief executive officer Colonel Sandeep Shaligram told
    The National the case had been immediately reported to the Covid-19 National Control Centre (NCC) when the man tested positive.

    He said it was the only confirmed as a covid-19 case when tested at the hospital last week.

    Colonel Shaligram said the hospital had reported the case to the NCC when the man was tested positive and admitted.

    He also confirmed that another patient admitted was medically evacuated overseas but said the illness was not related to the Covid-19.

    Shaligram said the only other case that had tested positive at the hospital was from  samples received from East New Britain last week which was also reported to the NCC.

    “As soon as a test is returned positive, we report it to the NCC and they do the contact tracing,” he said.

    Male expatriate aged about 50
    According to sources, the patient currently admitted is a male expatriate aged around 50 who is feeling better and wanting to be medically evacuated overseas.

    A woman who took the man to the hospital had tested negative.

    The case of the Port Moresby man currently admitted at PIH was, however, not included in the NCC update circulated to the media last week.

    It is not known what steps had been taken by the NCC to conduct contact tracing.

    The only two cases in Port Moresby reported by the centre were of a 47-year-old woman and an 89-year-old man.

    Attempts by The National to get comments from the Health Department and the Deputy National Pandemic Response Controller were not successful.

    National cases total now 834
    The national total for covid-19 cases stands at 834 as of last Thursday.

    It included a 48-year-old male mining contractor at Ok Tedi Mine who was tested positive on his return to work in North Fly.

    He was not showing any symptoms of the covid-19 at the time of testing but swab samples returned positive.

    According to the NCC, 19 cases of covid-19 were reported last week from around the country.

    Asia Pacific Report republishes The National articles with permission.

    Print Friendly, PDF & Email

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • By The National in Port Moresby

    An expatriate who tested positive for the covid-19 coronavirus last week has been admitted to a private hospital in the Papua New Guinea capital of Port Moresby, an official has confirmed.

    Pacific International Hospital (PIH) chief executive officer Colonel Sandeep Shaligram told
    The National the case had been immediately reported to the Covid-19 National Control Centre (NCC) when the man tested positive.

    He said it was the only confirmed as a covid-19 case when tested at the hospital last week.

    Colonel Shaligram said the hospital had reported the case to the NCC when the man was tested positive and admitted.

    He also confirmed that another patient admitted was medically evacuated overseas but said the illness was not related to the Covid-19.

    Shaligram said the only other case that had tested positive at the hospital was from  samples received from East New Britain last week which was also reported to the NCC.

    “As soon as a test is returned positive, we report it to the NCC and they do the contact tracing,” he said.

    Male expatriate aged about 50
    According to sources, the patient currently admitted is a male expatriate aged around 50 who is feeling better and wanting to be medically evacuated overseas.

    A woman who took the man to the hospital had tested negative.

    The case of the Port Moresby man currently admitted at PIH was, however, not included in the NCC update circulated to the media last week.

    It is not known what steps had been taken by the NCC to conduct contact tracing.

    The only two cases in Port Moresby reported by the centre were of a 47-year-old woman and an 89-year-old man.

    Attempts by The National to get comments from the Health Department and the Deputy National Pandemic Response Controller were not successful.

    National cases total now 834
    The national total for covid-19 cases stands at 834 as of last Thursday.

    It included a 48-year-old male mining contractor at Ok Tedi Mine who was tested positive on his return to work in North Fly.

    He was not showing any symptoms of the covid-19 at the time of testing but swab samples returned positive.

    According to the NCC, 19 cases of covid-19 were reported last week from around the country.

    Asia Pacific Report republishes The National articles with permission.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • Fijian health worker Usaia Masuwale … thumbs up for covid vaccination programme. Image: Sunday Times

    Pacific Media Watch newsdesk

    After receiving two shots of the covid-19 Pfizer vaccine, former Fijian resident Usaia Masuwale believes the vaccine is safe and says Fijians need to take the shot, reports Jale Daucakacaka in Fiji’s Sunday Times.

    Masuwale. who is a health worker in San Francisco, believes Fijians should not be influenced by negative reports circulating on social media.

    “I was one of the first ones to take the shot and haven’t felt any side effects at all,” he said.

    He said covid-19 was worse than the side-effects of the vaccine and he hoped people would take it once it is available.

    Permanent Secretary for Health Dr James Fong said a task force was being set up within the Health Ministry to plan how the covid-19 vaccine would be administered to Fijians.

    For more on this story and other stories, grab a copy of today’s Sunday Times from your nearest outlet.

    US Pacific Islands move quickly
    In Majuro, Marshall Islands Journal editor Giff Johnson reports that three United States-affiliated countries in the north Pacific have launched aggressive covid-19 vaccine programmes, following receipt of thousands of doses from the US Centers for Disease Control.

    On a per capita basis, the islands have higher vaccine rates than many states in the US, said the Marshall Islands Health Secretary in Majuro.

    In the first 10 days since receiving a small number of doses to start, the Marshall Islands injected first vaccines to over 600 healthcare workers and front line government employees who work in sea and airports.

    The US government is providing the Moderna brand covid-19 vaccines to the Marshall Islands, Federated States of Micronesia and Palau.

    Reporting from The Fiji Times and RNZ under a community partnership agreement.

    Print Friendly, PDF & Email

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Pacific Media Watch newsdesk

    After receiving two shots of the covid-19 Pfizer vaccine, former Fijian resident Usaia Masuwale believes the vaccine is safe and says Fijians need to take the shot, reports Jale Daucakacaka in Fiji’s Sunday Times.

    Masuwale. who is a health worker in San Francisco, believes Fijians should not be influenced by negative reports circulating on social media.

    “I was one of the first ones to take the shot and haven’t felt any side effects at all,” he said.

    He said covid-19 was worse than the side-effects of the vaccine and he hoped people would take it once it is available.

    Permanent Secretary for Health Dr James Fong said a task force was being set up within the Health Ministry to plan how the covid-19 vaccine would be administered to Fijians.

    For more on this story and other stories, grab a copy of today’s Sunday Times from your nearest outlet.

    US Pacific Islands move quickly
    In Majuro, Marshall Islands Journal editor Giff Johnson reports that three United States-affiliated countries in the north Pacific have launched aggressive covid-19 vaccine programmes, following receipt of thousands of doses from the US Centers for Disease Control.

    On a per capita basis, the islands have higher vaccine rates than many states in the US, said the Marshall Islands Health Secretary in Majuro.

    In the first 10 days since receiving a small number of doses to start, the Marshall Islands injected first vaccines to over 600 healthcare workers and front line government employees who work in sea and airports.

    The US government is providing the Moderna brand covid-19 vaccines to the Marshall Islands, Federated States of Micronesia and Palau.

    Reporting from The Fiji Times and RNZ under a community partnership agreement.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • SPECIAL REPORT: By Ena Manuireva in Auckland

    It seems a long time ago – some 124 days – since Mā’ohi Nui deplored its first covid-19 related deaths of an elderly woman on 11 September 2020 followed by her husband just hours later, both over the age of 80.

    The local territorial government was indeed saddened about the loss and sent its condolences to the grieving family and relatives.

    The opening of Mā’ohi Nui’s borders two months earlier on July 15 by the French High Commissioner, Dominique Sorain, in consultation with Tahiti’s President Edouard Fritch – who promptly agreed due to economic reasons – has led to today’s covid-19 pandemic crisis.

    The latest figures at the time of writing show 124 covid-19 deaths, 40 people in hospital (including 19 patients on ventilators), and 80 new cases, making it a total of more than 17,400.

    About 17,500 vaccine doses were available last week on January 7 for more than 8000 people but, unfortunately, one expects more deaths before the injection programme is rolled out.

    Tahiti covid-19 statistics
    Mā’ohi Nui and covid-19, as many deaths as days since the first fatality on 11 September 2020 (as at January 13). Image: Tahiti-Infos

    These are sobering figures when entering January 2021 on the Gregorian calendar – and equally the Tahitian chart speaks of the Pleiades constellation, or Matari’i i Ni’a, foretelling abundance that extends from November to May.

    Sadly, for the mourning families the only season of abundance appears to be the losses of the most vulnerable in our society – our elders.

    It is also quite revealing that information about covid-19 cases are on a drip-feed from the Ministry of Health, with its minister doctor Jacques Raynal comparing covid-19 from the beginning to a mere flu.

    And sometimes he was at pains to explain the differences between “cured” and “convalescing” patients.

    It is clear that the local government, along with the highest representative of the French government, were unprepared and remained ill-equipped with this pandemic, a déjà-vu situation.

    The spectre of Jacques Chirac and nuclear past
    The most populated islands of the Society archipelago (Tahiti and Moorea) have been under curfew from December 14 to January 15, 2021, and that might be extended.

    The only hospital centre of French Polynesia is at Ta’aone in Tahiti and that caters for the covid-19 patients. It has done so to the best of the hospital staff’s abilities. The same hospital complex is now at the centre of another dispute between pro-independent member of the Parliament Eliane Tevahitua and Health Minister Raynal, who sent an open invitation to the members of the hospital board (Tevahitua being a member), confirming in a ministerial letter that the name of the hospital would become Jacques Chirac, named after the late former French president.

    For good measure, the family of President Chirac gave their approval and are honoured by such a gesture.

    It is believed that the trade-off is that the Jacques Chirac Square in the capital Pape’ete (a name given to it by former Tahitian president Gaston Flosse) will be renamed “Tahua Tumarama” which in the indigenous language Mā’ohi means the “stage of rising light” (resembling the aftermath of a nuclear bomb).

    The naming of the Chirac square was more than 20 years ago, which was in itself very controversial at the time, due to the fact that a plaque was erected not far from that very square to commemorate the people who had died (and are still dying) from the 30-year French nuclear testing programme started on 2 July 1966.

    President Chirac resumed the suspended nuclear testing from September 1995 to May 1996.

    Some historical information about the Jacques Chirac hospital complex should be shared. It was a former military base reserved for French military personal and kitted with bungalows.

    The hospital opened in 1966 for the Centre of Experimentation of the Pacific (CEP) where the majority of French military were based before or after their missions to Fangataufa, Hao, Mangareva and Moruroa.

    As children, we used to enjoy Ta’aone since the maritime military base gave onto a beautiful beach where we sunbathed and surfed, a popular place with the local population.

    Those memories seem to send us back to the nuclear testing period some two generations ago and it might be fitting that such a hospital complex should carry the name of one of the French presidents.

    What is more telling – or unfortunate – is the fact that the name Jacques Chirac appears to carry the signs of death whether related to the square next to the monument dedicated to those who died from the nuclear testing, or to this new hospital where people are being cared for but where unfortunately 124 people have so far died from covid-19, and many more from diseases related to nuclear fallout.

    Éliane Tevahitua
    Pro-independence party parliamentarian Élaine Tevahitua … challenge over the naming of Tahiti’s main covid hospital after the late French President Jacques Chirac. Image: La Depeche de Tahiti

    The reply of independent parliamentarian and Oscar Temaru
    Back to the request of joining the local government in naming the hospital, pro-independence parliamentarian Tevahitua’s response to such an invitation did not fail to tell the health minister and the local government of the independent party Tavini Huira’atira’s (and her) “deep disappointment and disapproval” of such a neo-colonialist stand “to the detriment of the indigenous Polynesian people”.

    “While the Mā’ohi people are trying to regain their own history and at a time when your government is promoting the use of the Mā’ohi languages in public space, it would have been more judicious to name the hospital Tiurai, an indigenous traditional tahu’a (doctor) who dedicated his life to caring and healing people’s pain for free”.

    Ironically, Tiurai died from the Spanish flu pandemic in 1918.

    In the same vein through my latest communication with Oscar Temaru, the leader of the independence party Tavini Huira’atira, has shown how his approach to local toponymy favoured illustrious and respected Mā’ohi figures who deserved to be honoured by the people, instead of the name of some coloniser.

    While at the helm of the country as president (on and off from 2004 to 2009), Temaru changed the name of one of the most important avenues of the capital Pape’ete from Avenue Bruat (the first French governor) to Avenue Pouvana’a a O’opa after the famous indeopendence leader. A judicious political move as this historical avenue is considered to be the heart of the political and administrative arena.

    Ave Pouvana’a a O’opa
    Old Avenue Bruat (left) in the heart of Pape’ete … now known as Avenue Pouvana’a a O’opa after the Tahitian independence hero. Image: Tahiti Heritage

    This was a move that evidently did not please the French authorities, although naming rights is a competence held by the local government.

    Not without irony
    It is not without some irony that Temaru declared that there are some Tahitian politicians who are more French than the French and who reluctantly adhered to the new name.

    According to Temaru, it is more “the mentality of our own people that he has been trying to change from the very beginning of his struggle against the French colonial power”.

    Unfortunately, today a pro-France local government has turned the clock back and are perpetuating the neo-colonialism agenda.

    It would have been more appropriate to maintain the original name of the hospital as Ta’aone, which means the rolling of the sand.

    Most of the hospitals in Pape’ete and its neighbouring districts carry a colonial name (Chirac, Prince, Malardé and Cardella) apart, from a psychiatric hospital with an indigenous name of Vaiami and a clinic called Paofai.

    It might give us an idea of how we, the indigenous people are been perceived and how, while we name buildings by their geographical location, colonisers are obsessed with seeing names of illustrious figures on temporary edifices in an effort to give them permanence and relevancy.

    Ena Manuireva is a Mangarevian originally from the south of “French” Polynesia who has lived in New Zealand for many years and is currently a doctoral studies candidate in Te Ara Poutama at Auckland University of Technology. He contributes articles for Asia Pacific Report.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.