Category: refugees

  • A doctor has accused the Home Office of “moral failure” over the continued housing of asylum seekers at an ageing and virus-hit military barracks.

    Napier Barracks in Kent has been used as “emergency” accommodation since September last year, despite significant welfare concerns.

    But even before any residents had moved in, Public Health England (PHE) gave warnings that the dormitories on the military site were “not suitable” for use, according to court documents.

    In the months since it opened, coronavirus (Covid-19) has surged behind the barbed wire fences with at least 120 residents testing positive.

    Despite this, the Home Office has continued to defend its use of the Ministry of Defence-owned barracks.

    Napier Barracks incident
    Napier Barracks in Folkestone, Kent following a fire at the site (Gareth Fuller/PA)

    Last week, home secretary Priti Patel said the site is “Covid-compliant” and “has been from day one”.

    Immigration minister Chris Philp said last month that those housed in Napier Barracks were staying in “safe, suitable, Covid-compliant accommodation”.

    At least four residents at Napier Barracks have attempted suicide and others have self-harmed, according to court documents.

    Dr Jill O’Leary, the leading GP for charity the Helen Bamber Foundation’s medical advisory service, said the news that the Home Office had apparently rejected a PHE warning was “very, very sad but not surprising”.

    She told the PA news agency:

    We have been very vocal about our concerns about the unsuitability of the barracks and the fact that it wasn’t Covid-19 compliant which is evidenced by the fact that there was obviously this Covid-19 outbreak.

    Dr O’Leary said the barracks had been chosen for “political expediency” and the continued use amounted to a “moral failure”.

    She added:

    The barracks need to be evacuated, there’s no justification and no argument left for keeping people in there.

    Doctors and lawyers from organisations including the Helen Bamber Foundation, Doctors of the World and Freedom from Torture have been monitoring the situation at the barracks.

    The site has been used to house up to 400 residents, but reports suggest many have been moved off the site in recent days with around 50 remaining.

    Lawyers representing six men previously housed at Napier Barracks, all of whom are said to be “survivors of torture and/or human trafficking”, say it must be “immediately” closed down.

    In a witness statement, in court documents, they remark on the “troubling” revelation that PHE warned the Home Office that the dormitories “were not suitable” for use – advice which was rejected.

    They also allege that “no Home Office official has visited the site since November 13 2020” – a claim the Home Office has denied.

    That the Home Office had been warned by PHE that the dormitories were not suitable was mentioned in the department’s submissions to the court and was not disputed by its spokesperson.

    The Home Office spokesperson said:

    The Government provides safe, warm and secure accommodation with three nutritious meals served a day, all paid for by the taxpayer.

    Napier has previously accommodated army personnel and it is wrong to say it is not adequate for asylum seekers.

    The Home Office has worked extremely closely with Public Health England to minimise risks of coronavirus and this track record will be robustly defended in court.

    The spokesperson added that Tuesday’s hearing was “one step in the legal process”, adding “the Home Office has not lost or conceded the case”.

    Bella Sankey, director of charity Detention Action, said:

    Of course PHE warned Priti Patel that her refugee camp experiment would put public health at risk – anyone with a passing interest in Covid transmission can see this.

    The Home Office should fully concede, close the barracks and save lives without delay.

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • Father and son sought refuge after protests but are becoming a diplomatic issue for Sweden

    Two Belarusians who sought refuge in the Swedish embassy in Minsk in September are still there five months later, Sweden’s foreign ministry has announced, in a case turning into a diplomatic headache.

    A father and son, Vitaly and Vladislav Kuznechiki, tried to enter the Swedish embassy in the capital of Belarus on 11 September to seek asylum in the midst of widespread protests disputing the election of President Alexander Lukashenko.

    Related: Video shows taxi driver helping protester escape police in Belarus

    Continue reading…

    This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.

  • Despite Biden's Moratorium, ICE Deports Dozens to Haiti -- Including a Baby

    U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement has deported at least 72 people to Haiti, including a 2-month-old baby and 21 other children. The deportations appear to be a contradiction of the Biden administration’s order to deport only people with serious charges against them. Haiti faces an increase in political violence and ongoing protests against President Jovenel Moïse’s U.S.-backed regime, and Guerline Jozef, co-founder and executive director of Haitian Bridge Alliance, says sending people to Haiti is putting them in danger. “We should be providing protection for those people, but we are sending them into a burning house,” says Jozef.

    TRANSCRIPT

    This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.

    AMY GOODMAN: This is Democracy Now! I’m Amy Goodman, with Juan González.

    President Biden ordered a 100-day moratorium on deportations as one of his first acts in office. But on Monday, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ICE, deported at least 72 people to Haiti. Those deported included a 2-month-old baby and 21 other babies and children — which seems to contradict the order by a federal judge that blocked the moratorium but left in place instructions that only the most serious immigration cases should be subject to deportation. The Guardian reports the adults and children were deported on two flights to the Haitian capital Port-au-Prince as the country faces skyrocketing political violence and protests against the Haitian president’s U.S.-backed regime. They’ve been going on for months, these protests.

    Their push came after hundreds were deported within Biden’s first days in office, mostly from Haiti and African countries, including a man named Paul Pierrilus, who was deported to Haiti. New York Congressmember Mondaire Jones had previously worked to successfully stop his deportation by the Trump administration, before Biden was sworn in. But last Tuesday, Mondaire Jones tweeted, quote, “At 3am, my staff woke up to an urgent call. Suddenly, and in the dead of night, ICE was set to deport Rockland County’s beloved Paul Pierrilus to Haiti, a country where he has never been,” unquote.

    Monday’s deportations to Haiti came after ICE had just suspended deportation flights to Haiti on Friday, following pressure from immigrant justice advocates, including our next guest, Guerline Jozef, co-founder and executive director of the Haitian Bridge Alliance, an immigrant support group. She’s joining us from Orange County, California, not far from the border.

    Welcome to Democracy Now!, Guerline. Can you explain what just happened? How does a 2-month-old, a number of babies and, overall, more than 70 people get reported to Haiti after the moratorium of Biden is put into effect? Has ICE just gone rogue, or is this part of a Biden-Harris plan?

    GUERLINE JOZEF: Good morning, Amy. Thank you for having us.

    Actually, we are all in disbelief of what we are witnessing right now in these United States of ours, to see how we continue to witness the same draconian, the same cruel and inhumane process that President Trump left behind.

    Yesterday, as you mentioned, there were two deportation flights to Haiti, unfortunately, the first one carrying about 72 people. Out of those 72 people included 22 children, and we saw as young as 2 months old. And we are looking at children, 2 months, 10 years old. They are right in the middle of developmental stage, where we should be providing protection for those people, but we see we are sending them into a burning — in a burning house. Literally, there’s a house burning, and we are sending pregnant women and children into this burning house.

    JUAN GONZÁLEZ: And, Guerline Jozef, apparently ICE is using a controversial health statute, Title 42, that’s about more than 70 years old, that the Trump administration first started using. What is Title 42?

    GUERLINE JOZEF: Title 42, they are using right now because of the pandemic. But the reality is, those people, I will say, are testing negative for COVID-19, so, therefore, it is an excuse to continue to deport people.

    And as you mentioned earlier, under the moratorium from the president, did provide provision of relief and protection for those most vulnerable people, as we mentioned, that have been at the border for the past four years waiting for a chance to ask for asylum, understanding that President Trump completely destroyed the immigration system, completely trapped people at the U.S.-Mexico border, from MPP to third-country asylum agreement, forcing people to literally die, understanding that Black immigrants are the most vulnerable, the most impacted and the most neglected group of immigrants. So this has to stop. We can no longer stand by and watch people’s lives being destroyed. We are asking and demanding that all deportation flights are stopped immediately.

    JUAN GONZÁLEZ: And is it your sense that ICE is acting on its own or that the Biden administration, the officials who have come in to homeland security and to ICE, the newly appointed officials, are aware of this?

    GUERLINE JOZEF: I cannot speak on behalf of ICE nor the government nor the administration. But what I can say is that we saw — we saw the pain. We hear it in the voices of those children and those asylum seekers and those immigrants. We do not know what is going on. We do not know what the relationship is. But what we are seeing is unacceptable.

    So we are asking for President Biden, for the administration, to do what needs to be done. ICE needs to listen to what the administration and the secretary are instructing them to do, right? They cannot just decide they’re going to do whatever they want. We understand, under President Trump, the boldness that it took for them to gut the immigration system. We understand the boldness that it took to literally uplift these draconian practices. So now we are asking boldness for good. We are asking boldness to build better. We are asking boldness for relief and protection for the people. So, whatever it is, the relationship might be, between ICE and the administration, we want this to be the — we want this to be the catalyst that we move forward to as a country.

    AMY GOODMAN: You know, Juan and I —

    GUERLINE JOZEF: And we are also asking — yeah, and we are also asking the Haitian government to not accept those deportation flights. As you mentioned, we have a stateless man in Paul Pierrilus. I was on the phone with him and his attorney and Congressman Mondaire Jones’ staffer when they came to take him. I was on the phone hearing to his voice. I was on the phone with his attorney telling him to, please, please, go with them, because they wanted to remove him forcibly, while he was on the phone. His attorney did not receive a note saying that he was being removed. We only found out because we were on the phone with him when they came to get him.

    AMY GOODMAN: Juan and I met in Haiti covering the U.S.-backed coups that took place there. Finally, Guerline, what people are being deported to in Haiti? And we don’t have much time.

    GUERLINE JOZEF: Yes, thank you so much. Actually, right now we are in the middle of a major uprising. We are worried that we might end up with a bloody massacre. In one side, we have the opposition and a lot of people in the diaspora, in U.S. Congress, stating that based on the Constitution, the president should have left on Sunday, February the 7th. The president is saying, no, his term ends next year.

    So, right now we are asking for protection. Those deportations cannot still continue to happen in the middle of a major crisis in Haiti. As you mentioned, we continue to see over and over the neglect, the lack of respect for life on both sides. So we are asking for that to be stopped.

    AMY GOODMAN: Guerline Jozef, we want to thank you for being with us, executive director of the Haitian Bridge Alliance.

    And again, Democracy Now! will be live-streaming the Senate impeachment trial of Donald Trump, gavel to gavel, starting at 1:00 Eastern time today. I’m Amy Goodman, with Juan González. Wearing a mask is an act of love. Wear two.

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • Migrants and associates install tents as part of a protest on Republique square in Paris on November 23, 2020, one week after migrants were evacuated from a makeshift camp in the northern Paris suburb of Saint-Denis without being relocated.

    During the election campaign that led him to the White House, Joe Biden promised swift reversal of Donald Trump’s draconian anti-immigrant policies. On his first day in office, President Biden signed executive orders to halt construction of the border wall, reverse the Muslim ban and safeguard DACA, a temporary programme that protects some migrants who came to the U.S. as children.

    Only a week into his term, the bold plans for reform began to falter. Biden’s 100-day deportation moratorium was barred by a judge. The plan to reunite separated migrant families is delayed. And Biden’s most ambitious proposal, amnesty for most of the 11 million undocumented, is already in doubt. Meanwhile, in the midst of a raging pandemic, Democrats are calling for more targeted relief for undocumented immigrants who act as essential workers.

    A Progressive Vision?

    The precedent for immigration relief for workers on the frontlines of COVID-19 came from the other side of the Atlantic a month earlier. In late December 2020, the French government announced that it was fast-tracking citizenship applications for immigrants working as essential workers during the pandemic, in order to reward them for their special service to French citizens. The naturalisation applications of these immigrants already on the path to citizenship would be expedited, but they would still go through the required steps, including proving their integration into French society.

    France’s new citizenship exception would seem to offer a progressive vision for the new Biden administration. The spectacle of white nationalists storming the U.S. Capitol on 6 January, with their belligerent messaging of racism, misogyny and xenophobia, redoubled the calls by liberals to undo or reverse Trump’s immigration policies. Many continued to advocate specifically for immigrant essential workers.

    Tweet advocating citizenship for essential workers

    However, it would be wrong to follow this vision of immigration policy. To address the entrenched racism exposed and exacerbated — but not created — by the Trump administration, different tactics are required. The demands for the Biden administration should reach much further than reforms that entrench the system itself, whether a path to citizenship for the most deserving essential workers or protecting DACA, which is just a temporary programme with no path to citizenship.

    France’s fast-tracked naturalisation process undoubtedly improves the lives of a few immigrants, providing them with security and benefits that they would not otherwise have. Notably, these are not undocumented immigrants but those already on the path to citizenship. Yet, it is a mistake to uncritically celebrate the French government and its pandemic-era generosity.

    While a few hundred, or even, eventually, thousand immigrants may become French citizens in recognition of their “commitment to the nation”, this policy makes no change to the country’s harsh immigration system. By recognising essential migrant workers, the French state is primarily making a statement about how it values the lives of citizens who require care. U.S. observers are pointing to France as an example of inclusive immigration policies when France, like the U.S., is actually waging a racist war against immigrants.

    As with the exceptional humanitarian measures the French state has instituted in the past, which simultaneously justify criminalising and deporting a majority of immigrants, these policies draw attention away from the precarious conditions in which the majority of immigrants live — which include an increasing number of informal camps in the heart of Paris.

    The French immigration system is increasingly draconian, under pressure from the extreme rightwing populist National Rally party, formerly known as the National Front, and the turn to the right in Europe more generally. President Macron imposed a new law in 2018 that cut the timeframe to legally apply for asylum — with the goal of deporting people more quickly — and doubled the amount of time that immigrants could be kept in detention. In 2018, France detained more migrants than any other EU country.

    No Pathway to Legalization

    Like the U.S., France is home to legions of undocumented immigrants who work in exploitative conditions that now expose them to COVID-19, and who have no pathways to legalisation, before or after French government’s new policy. Furthermore, there is the long-standing fear in France that acknowledging race and racism or even the existence of different ethnic communities in its society would lead to an ‘Anglo-Saxon’ acceptance of divided communities. But this unacknowledged racism, often expressed as Islamophobia, has been called out by French immigrant rights groups and anti-racist collectives, who say the country’s colonial history is expressed in exclusionary immigration policies, among other practices.

    If the U.S. government adopted the policy of fast-tracked naturalisation for essential workers, as some are calling for, it would similarly serve to draw attention away from the difficult and often violent conditions under which so many immigrants live, covering up the fact that both American and French societies primarily value immigrant lives when they are sacrificed. The trend in the U.S. throughout the last two decades of Democrat and Republican administrations has been increased surveillance and criminalisation of immigrants, expansion of immigrant detention and deportation, and extreme militarisation of the U.S.-Mexico border.

    Rewarding essential workers with citizenship entrenches the idea that most immigrants should not be granted legal status and that the state’s job is to keep its borders closed, protecting limited resources — this is so even as both France and the U.S. are fully reliant on immigrant labour.

    Rather than putting in place a standard policy of inclusion, the state decides which few immigrants have proved themselves most deserving of inclusion, gathering accolades for its generosity. Speeding up citizenship for immigrant essential workers in the US — similarly to members of the U.S. military, at least in theory — would serve the same purpose. These policies are designed to build pride in the nation’s benevolence and care, even as they work behind the scenes to legitimise the mass exclusion, detention or exploitation of migrants, based on racist ideas of belonging. They make citizens feel better about the woeful ways in which their governments treat immigrants, giving them a moral pass.

    Premising citizenship on exceptional deservingness is a common way of talking about who deserves to become a citizen. Before this pandemic, France gave citizenship to a Malian immigrant who risked his life to scale a building and save a child. But rewarding heroes has also meant implicitly consenting to criminalising everyone who is not a hero.

    During the pandemic, the stories of immigrant deservingness in the U.S. shifted from exceptional youth to essential workers — farm labourers, cleaners, medical personnel — who were amply demonstrating their utility to the nation. Some called on the U.S. government to give these undocumented essential workers protection from deportation or even a path to citizenship. This would undoubtedly improve the lot of these immigrants, yet once again lifts up the few, while maintaining a system that criminalises most. Such calls draw attention away from the failures of the government to provide state payments that allow people to stay at home during a pandemic or make their workplaces safer.

    The linkage between citizenship and productivity in a capitalist workplace, usually as an exploited worker, has uncomfortable implications. Firstly, it leaves out all those who work outside the narrow definitions of productivity, such as in unpaid care work, and those who are young, elderly, disabled, and otherwise outside the capitalist market. Secondly, immigrants are positioned as deserving of the protections of citizenship by the dint of their labour for others.

    After the past year of uprisings against white supremacy in both France and the U.S., it is easy to connect this way of valuing immigrants to the legacies of slavery and colonialism. Indeed, immigrants are being valued for their ability to take the fall, to get sick so “we” do not. To pay this impossible debt — the debt of life, and generations of life, valued as lesser — the state is recognising these immigrants now: quid pro quo. It says: now, we owe you nothing — all histories can be forgotten. We must resist judging the worth of human life and dignity in this way.

    Protecting Ill-Gained Riches of Empire

    What if, in fact, France and the U.S. truly followed the principles upon which their nations were formed — liberty, equality, fraternity; and to be the land of the free? What if they valued everyone’s life equally? Tendayi Achiume, legal scholar and UN Special Rapporteur on contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance, argues that citizenship for all immigrants from the “Third World” to the “First” would simply enact an entitlement to political equality that recognises the interconnections created by past and ongoing forms of imperialism. In other words, French or U.S. citizenship for immigrants — all immigrants — is a form of decolonisation or even debt repayment for past and ongoing imperial projects. Militarised borders, in contrast, are attempts to protect the ill-gained riches of empire.

    There should be an immediate amnesty and path to citizenship for all immigrants in the U.S., whether or not they are deemed essential. While Biden’s plan to provide a pathway to all 11 million undocumented immigrants is a start, why should it be delayed for eight years? More urgently, the U.S. border must be demilitarised, through the dismantling of ICE and Border Patrol, as these groups create the need to label some people as “illegal”, enabling violence against them, and will continue to do so, regardless of a one-time pathway to citizenship. These demands tie in with the Black Lives Matter movement’s abolitionist demands to undo the carceral system, and replace it with one that treats all people with care and respect.

    With a week left in his presidency, Trump visited the border wall in the Rio Grande Valley, to shore up his legacy of hate. A true break with racist policy would knock down the wall and all its supporting ramparts, including the idea of deservingness.

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • Thousands of refugees in the UK live in rundown conditions with the bare minimum of provisions, writes Enver Solomon of the Refugee Council

    If you or your family had to uproot yourselves to flee war, persecution and torture, and you managed to make it to a safe country, only to be put in a former army barracks or rundown hotel room with little access to support beyond the bare minimum of provisions, how would you feel (‘We felt like we were animals’: asylum seekers describe life in UK barracks, 2 February)? Distressed? Terrified? Anxious? Traumatised? Probably all of those things.

    That’s the reality for thousands of people in the UK. They are forced to live in limbo due to delays in their asylum claims, while living in accommodation where they struggle to access basics such as clothing, healthcare and education. Our government presents people seeking asylum as a threat, rather than humans with great potential to offer our communities. We must do better. Global Britain should be a beacon of compassion and humanity. There are Conservative MPs who believe this (Former immigration minister criticises use of barracks to house asylum seekers, 2 Feb). The prime minister should speak out and move quickly to house people seeking asylum in decent living conditions.
    Enver Solomon
    Chief executive, Refugee Council

    Continue reading…

    This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.

  • In September 2020, the Home Office began to house refugees in former Ministry of Defence (MoD) sites.

    Two military camps are being used – Penally Barracks in Pembrokeshire, and Napier Barracks in Kent. As The Canary previously reportedthe poor conditions at military barrack camps have increasingly been the subject of protests.

    But it turns out that there’s an outrageous reason why refugees are being forced to endure these appalling conditions. The Home Office is housing refugees in barracks because of concern about confidence in the asylum system.

    The Independent reported on 31 January that it had seen internal documents saying “the need to control immigration” justified the provision of “less generous” housing for refugees.

    The documents

    The Independent saw a copy of the equality impact assessment of using military barracks as refugee camps.

    The assessment stated:

    Any provision of support over and beyond what is necessary to enable the individuals to meet their housing and subsistence needs could undermine public confidence in the asylum system and hamper wider efforts to tackle prejudice and promote understanding within the general community and amongst other migrant groups.

    It also said there is a difference between British citizens in need of welfare assistance and refugees.

    The camps

    In December, The Canary interviewed refugees at the Penally camp. They said there were few measures to protect against coronavirus (Covid-19), that they lacked privacy, and that they felt at risk from racist demonstrators outside.

    One refugee said:

    It’s horrible here, I can’t describe how difficult. And every day it is getting worse.

    People are really depressed and we have no hope. We always ask each other ‘why is it us that were sent here’.

    In January, more than a hundred residents at Napier Barracks tested positive for coronavirus.

    Opposition to the camps

    Community organisations have been urging the government to move refugees out of the military barracks.

    Refugee organisations and campaigners wrote a letter in December to Chris Philp, under-secretary of state for immigration compliance, that said:

    We believe that it’s unviable to keep people in barracks; the accommodation is not suitable for vulnerable people and over the last few days there have been suicide attempts, hunger strikes and protests about conditions at the Napier Barracks. It is impossible to socially distance when there are as many as 28 people sharing two toilets and up to 14 people sleeping in a room. As you know, there have already been a number of Covid-19 cases in the barracks which shows the difficulty in keeping the virus contained in such conditions.

    There have also been several protests outside the camps and in cities about the conditions.

    Political gain

    In light of what the documents reveal, opposition to the camps has increased.

    Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants (JCWI) legal director, Chai Patel, told the Independent:

    The government implied these cramped and disused barracks were being used as temporary housing because there was no alternative.

    But this document reveals that Home Office has been jeopardising people’s health for partly political ends – prioritising playing ‘tough’ on migration over the lives of extremely vulnerable people, who’ve been placed in conditions reminiscent of those they were fleeing.

    The Home Office will have to answer for the decision to endanger the health of refugees to control immigration. This revelation showcases some of the worst of anti-refugee policies in this country – people housed in the camps deserve proper, safe housing.

    Featured image via Corporate Watch

    By Jasmine Norden

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • US-based group asks Athens to release details of tests conducted at facility built on former military installation

    An emergency refugee camp erected on the Aegean island of Lesbos is a potential health hazard for thousands of asylum seekers and aid workers because the site has been contaminated by lead poisoning, according to Human Rights Watch.

    The US-based group urged Athens’ centre-right government to release further details of the tests it has conducted at the facility, which was formerly a military installation.

    Continue reading…

    This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.

  • The Kurdish refugee – widely known as Moz Azimi – is adjusting to liberty after 2,737 days in detention, starting with ‘the most Aussie experience I could ever imagine’

    On his second day of freedom in Australia, at the start of the Australia Day weekend, Mostafa Azimitabar went to a Jimmy Barnes concert, which he called “the most Aussie experience I could ever imagine”.

    A member of Iran’s Kurdish minority who fled racist repression in his homeland to seek sanctuary in a safe country, Azimitabar spent 2,737 days detained by Australia.

    Related: Peter Dutton says refugees released from Melbourne hotel detention to save money

    This is the most beautiful moment of my life and one that I would like to share with you all. After 2,737 days locked up in detention – I am free.
    Thank you to all of the amazing people who helped me to stay strong.#GameOver pic.twitter.com/Y5HjFrN9U0

    48 hours after eight years in detention, I am here in the Yarra Valley, at a Jimmy Barnes concert. The most Aussie experience I could ever imagine. I am so deeply grateful to Jimmy and the Barnes family for the invitation.
    #GameOver pic.twitter.com/PqNmevcGSy

    I believe the power of the people can crumble the walls of oppression and my freedom is proof.

    Related: Fazel Chegeni wanted ‘nothing but peace’. Instead he died alone in Australia’s island prison

    Continue reading…

    This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.

  • Call for Home Office to act after private contractors tell people their applications will be jeopardised for speaking out, going on hunger strikes or complaining about food

    People held at temporary Home Office refugee camps are being threatened that their asylum claims will be harmed if they “misbehave”, according to testimony from site residents.

    A series of statements from asylum seekers inside the camps, anonymised to protect them from possible reprisals, allege they have been told by staff employed by private contractors that their asylum application will be jeopardised for speaking out about conditions or going on hunger strike.

    Related: Home Office wrong to stop asylum seekers working in UK, court rules

    Continue reading…

    This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.

  • The UN calls for the resumption of state-led operations in the Mediterranean, as rescue groups’ vessels are detained in port

    At least 43 people have been killed after a boat carrying migrants capsized off the Libyan coast, the UN said on Wednesday.

    Ten people survived the shipwreck, which happened after the boat’s engine failed a few hours after departing the coastal city Zawiya, west of the capital Tripoli, on Tuesday morning.

    Related: Senior Libyan coastguard commander arrested for alleged human trafficking

    Continue reading…

    This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.

  • Human rights session calls on Canberra to raise age of criminal responsibility from 10 to 14 as China attacks Australia over ‘baseless charges’

    Australia has come under international pressure to reduce the number of children in detention, with more than 30 countries using a UN human rights session to call on authorities to raise the age of criminal responsibility.

    Amid ongoing tensions between China and Australia, Beijing’s representative took the opportunity on Wednesday evening to demand that Canberra “stop using false information to make baseless charges against other countries for political purposes”.

    Related: ‘Treat children like children’: Indigenous kids are crying out for help, judge says, not punishment

    Related: Australia ‘choosing to invest’ in hurting Indigenous kids, activist says – harming all of us

    Continue reading…

    This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.

  • As the United States transitions to a new administration, The Advocates for Human Rights looks forward to a renewed commitment to human rights in our domestic and foreign policy. Human rights standards provide a foundation to ensure that policy making is just, fair, and respects human dignity. 

    Topping the list, we welcome the end of the Muslim Ban, which four years ago served as the flagship for a xenophobic administrative agenda. We welcome the Biden-Harris Administration’s commitment to pursue an immigration policy that takes steps to reverse the harmful and illegal actions of the past four years and to chart a new course so that people can move with dignity. The Advocates looks forward to the Administration’s commitment to provide a path to regularize status and ensure dignity for those within our communities, restore our leadership on international human rights protections for those fleeing harm, and modernize our immigration system to recognize that harsh policies serve only to harm our nation and violate human rights.

    The Advocates additionally welcomes the Biden-Harris Administration’s stated priority to improve racial equity and justice through legal reforms that address systemic injustices in our legal system. International human rights law provides important guidelines for policing and use of force that should form the basis of these reforms, along with prohibitions against all forms discrimination in policy and practice.

    The Administration has promised to re-join the Paris Climate Accord and the World Health Organization. Restoring American involvement and leadership in international organizations and mechanisms is an important first step in effectively addressing the many challenges facing the world community.

    We also welcome the new Administration’s promises to protect all persons, regardless of gender or gender identity, beginning with plans to repeal transgender military ban enacted by President Trump, restore Obama-era guidance for transgender students in schools, and push to pass the “Equality Act,” a bill to add more protections for LGBT Americans. We also anticipate a renewed focus on ending violence against women, including the reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act and the expansion of its essential protections.

    Through our work, we have seen the negative impact of COVID-19 on victims of domestic violence and immigrants attempting to access legal protections in our immigration courts. Economic harms from the pandemic have increased evictions and foreclosures, increasing vulnerabilities to human trafficking and exploitation. We call on the new Administration to take a wholistic approach to responding to the health needs and economic harms caused by COVID-19.

    The Advocates knows that environmental concerns have impacts on human rights—often, driving migration, increasing conflict leading to abuses, and exacerbating existing inequalities and injustices. We welcome the new Administration’s day-one efforts to address climate change and the environment.

    The first priorities of the new Administration must be met with sustained commitment to respect for human rights, including racial equality, gender equality, migration with dignity, and advancement of protections for all people as we confront challenges facing the world. 

    This post was originally published on The Advocates Post.

  • Refugees set to be granted bridging visas more than a year after they were transferred to Australia under now-repealed medevac laws

    Refugee advocates say more than 20 men who have been detained in Melbourne hotel rooms for over a year are set to be released.

    One of the detainees being held at the Park Hotel in Carlton, Mostafa “Moz” Azimitabar, tweeted on Wednesday that 26 refugees being held in the hotel have been granted bridging visas.

    Breaking : Twenty six refugees who were locked up in the Park prison have got their Bridging Visa right now. Congratulations!!!

    Related: This is my eighth Christmas locked up in immigration detention. Next year I hope to celebrate as a free man | Mardin Arvin

    Continue reading…

    This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.

  • In his final months in office, Donald Trump has ramped up construction on his promised physical border between the US and Mexico – devastating wildlife habitats and increasing the migrant death toll

    At Sierra Vista Ranch in Arizona near the Mexican border, Troy McDaniel is warming up his helicopter. McDaniel, tall and slim in a tan jumpsuit, began taking flying lessons in the 80s, and has since logged 2,000 miles in the air. The helicopter, a cosy, two-seater Robinson R22 Alpha is considered a work vehicle and used to monitor the 640-acre ranch, but it’s clear he relishes any opportunity to fly. “We will have no fun at all,” he deadpans.

    McDaniel and his wife, Melissa Owen, bought their ranch and the 100-year-old adobe house that came with it in 2003. Years before, Owen began volunteering at the nearby Buenos Aires National Wildlife Refuge, and fell in love with the beauty and natural diversity of the area, as well as the quiet of their tiny town. That all changed last July when construction vehicles and large machinery started “barrelling down the two-lane state road”, says Owen.

    This is not about protecting America. It’s about protecting President Trump’s own interests

    We had three different jaguars in 2016 – we haven’t seen signs of any since construction began

    As you keep building, you keep pushing people into more remote and dangerous areas

    Continue reading…

    This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.

  • Four days after compounds were set alight, detainees report another disturbance involving fire, rubber bullets and tear gas

    Further unrest among detainees on Christmas Island is due to the Australian government holding people in “inhumane” conditions, refugee advocates have said.

    There were riots on Tuesday night that resulted in two compounds being set alight and advocates and detainees claim a further disturbance on Saturday evening involved fires, rubber bullets and the use of tear gas at the detention centre.

    Related: Christmas Island detainees riot and set fire to buildings in protest against conditions

    Related: Keeping Biloela family locked up on Christmas Island cost Australia $1.4m last year

    Continue reading…

    This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.

  • By Benny Mawel in Jayapura

    “Merry Christmas, 25 December 2020,” says the graffiti displayed in the yard of the Nduga student dormitory in the study city of Jayapura.

    Hundreds of eyes stared at the writing, then they moved forward lighting Christmas candles.

    “We want Christmas light,” said Arim Tabuni, a senior student who attended the joint event.

    Arim is one of Nduga’s students. He looked thin, like never before. Now he walks slowly and bent a little.

    “I was sick but came to light a candle. We want to continue to ignite the light of truth in our hearts,” he said softly, with a slight frown.

    He is still sick from the beatings of Indonesian security forces when he broke up a peaceful student demonstration in Jayapura city. The assault was inflicted on him on 2 May 2016.

    Beside him, Bheny Murib sat down, occasionally staring at the theme. He ignored his turn to light the candle. He just sat there until the event was over.

    Stories of refugees
    Apparently, Murib was mumbling stories of refugees in Nduga. He has lost the momentum of the joys of Christmas since 2018. Parents, younger siblings, and brothers left their house to the forest to neighbouring districts such as Lanny Jaya, Puncak, Asmat, Yahukimo and Jayawijaya (Wamena).

    He remembered house, honai (traditional house of indigenous West Papuans), the church is quiet. There is no puff of burning smoke celebrating Christmas together in the church yard.

    Nduga students from various study cities cannot go home on holiday like before.

    “We wanted to celebrate Christmas with our parents at home, but these two years have all disappeared,” said Murib.

    To remember that, Nduga students in Jayapura celebrate Christmas in the dormitory yard.

    “Usually there is a large dormitory hall but today it is on this courtyard,” he said, looking at the baby Jesus Christmas manger lying down.

    it reminded him of the birth of children in Nduga. Mothers were forced to give birth in forests and caves.

    Birth in the forest
    Gelina Lilbid is one of the names of the women she remembers giving birth in the forest.

    Lilbid is the wife of an uncle. Gelina gave birth on her way to flee from Yigi, Nduga, to Kyawagi, Lanny Jaya and on to Wamena.

    Murib told the story of the birth of a child who was named Pengungsiana Kelenea.

    According to the story of Gelina Lilbid: “I gave birth to a child in the middle of the forest on 4 December 2018.

    “A lot of people thought my son was dead. It turned out that my child was still breathing.

    “My child is sick, has difficulty breathing and has a cough with phlegm. It was very cold in the forest, so when we walked again, I felt that my baby had not moved.

    “We thought he was dead. The family had given up. A family asked me to throw my child away because it was thought he was dead.

    “But I still love and carry my child. Yes, if you really die, I have to bury my child properly even in the forest.

    “Because I kept carrying my baby, my brother made a fire and heated the tree leaves, and the heated leaves he stuck them all over my baby’s body.

    “After the brothers put the heated leaves on the fire, my baby breathed and drank breast milk. We went on a trip.

    “We were very scared because the TNI continued to shoot at our hiding place. We continued to walk in the forest, and we searched for a cave that we could hide in.

    “I was carrying my child having just arrived from Kuyawagi, Lanny Jaya Regency in Wamena. We have been in Kuyawagi since the beginning of December 2018.

    “Before going to Kuyawagi, we lived in the forest without eating enough food. We are very hard and suffering on our own land,” said Murib recounting Gelina Lilbid’s story.

    Refugee babies fleeing
    Refugee babies have fled with their parents, now in Jayawijaya (Wamena) district, since 2018. Refugees are now two years old in December 2020.

    There were two other children who were born on the way to the evacuation. Their names are Wene Kelenea and Larinus Kelenea.

    Wene is a word in the language of the Lani tribe, Yali and Huwula which means story, news, problems, confrontations, conflicts with one another.

    If the names are sorted into Wene, Larinus, Refugees. Because of the confrontation and conflict, they had to flee.

    He said his family were in refugee camps, children had to be born on the evacuation trip. It just passed. Everyone looks silent, takes it for granted, as if there is no conflict.

    “When will the Indonesian government, churches and the United Nations pay attention to our human rights,” he said.

    “If they cannot respect human rights, cannot take care of the fate of the Nduga people, all parties must admit that the Nduga people want to take care of themselves.”

    “Stop military operations in the Nduga region and give the West Papuan nation sovereign rights,” wrote the Nduga students, among the flickering candles on their dormitory grounds.

    This article was translated by a Pacific Media Watch correspondent from the original report.

    Print Friendly, PDF & Email

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Mrs. A and her husband with Professor Steve Meili and other members of the U of M legal team in November 2019

    “We are not afraid anymore.” states Mrs. A, a client at The Advocates for Human Rights, who along with her husband and two children, recently received an asylum grant after four long years of uncertainty. 

    When Mrs. A contacted The Advocates, she and her family had been through a great deal. Mrs. A, her husband, and their two children lived in a neighborhood in Southern Mexico with a heavy cartel presence. Without sufficient finances to pay illegally demanded “rent”, the family faced life-threatening danger. Cartel members did not hesitate to show up in Mrs. A’s neighborhood, guns in hand. Open fire ensued, wounding Mrs. A in her side and causing her husband and children to have severe injuries. Afraid and desperate, Mrs. A ventured with her family to a place of safety at the home of her relatives in Minnesota. She knew the road to safety would be long and arduous, but the first step was leaving Mexico, a place where she no longer felt safe to raise her children. Over the course of the next four years, the family would have to persevere and hold on to a distant beacon of hope. Volunteer attorneys in collaboration with The Advocates for Human Rights strove to be this beacon. 

    In the US, limitations on asylum grants continue to increase, making an asylum win no small feat. According to the US Department of Homeland Security, only 3.4% of Mexican asylum seekers were granted this humanitarian protection in 2019[1].  In recent years, the federal government has dramatically increased restrictions on access to asylum protection for victims of cartel and gang violence. In 2019, the Trump administration implemented a policy that forces asylum seekers from Central America to return to Mexico for an indefinite amount of time while their claims are processed[2]. In addition to compiling evidence, volunteer attorneys must make sure clients can remain in the country during the processing of their case. Mrs. A commented how grateful she felt to be away from “the place that has caused [them] so much harm.”

    The Advocates have a deep network of volunteers willing to work pro bono on asylum cases, including immigration clinics at all three Minnesota law schools.  Professor Steve Meili, faculty director of the Immigration and Human Rights Clinic at University of Minnesota’s Binger Center for New Americans, took on Mrs. A’s case and along with his clinical students, they created a robust legal team.   

    Winning an asylum case is a collaborative effort.  Staff at The Advocates for Human Rights’ Refugee and Immigrant Program provided support to the UofM legal team, providing strategy suggestions and helping to keep the team apprised of the frequent changes in asylum law over the course of the case. Because asylum cases have become more difficult to win in the United States, it is essential that refugees feel this network of legal support within their community. Mrs. A stated that her lawyers were “kind, attentive, efficient, and all meanings of the word”. After four long years since Mrs. A and her family’s arrival to the United States, the immigration judge granted asylum to her and her family.  “Now I can see my kids run and play and know that I don’t have to worry.” 

    What does it mean to be a lawyer for an asylum seeker? As Mrs. A stated, her lawyers became her family. She states “I feel like they mix with us and live through us and are emotionally invested in the cases. I saw the lawyers as my lawyers, but also as my family. They were there for me in crisis and when I lost hope. They were always with me when I was desperate or when it was really hard for me to talk about my case and they were there to console me and say, ‘Okay you can take a break.’ Now that I am not working with them anymore, I feel like I am losing a part of me.” At The Advocates for Human Rights, volunteer attorneys work tirelessly to win cases like Mrs. A’s and in doing so incorporate themselves into the lives of clients. 

    Thank you to all our volunteer attorneys for the work you do to make refugees feel safe and free in this country. The commitment of pro bono attorneys with The Advocates makes a lasting and significant impact on the lives of people like Mrs. A, as she notes “Don’t give up. Help your lawyers as much as you can to build a strong case. Collect all the evidence you can from your country. And we can do it.”

    [1] U.S. Department of Homeland Security. (September 2020). Refugees and Asylees: 2019. Annual Flow Report. Ryan Baugh.

    [2] City News Service (December 2019) Only 0.1% Of Asylum Seekers Granted Asylum Under Trump’s Remain In Mexico Policy KPBS.org.


    By Nechelle Dias, University of Connecticut student and Communications Intern at The Advocates for Human Rights

    Nechelle Dias, UConn student and intern at The Advocates for Human Rights

    The Advocates for Human Rights is a nonprofit organization dedicated to implementing international human rights standards to promote civil society and reinforce the rule of law. The Advocates represents more than 1000 asylum seekers, victims of trafficking, and immigrants in detention through a network of hundreds of pro bono legal professionals.



    Curious about volunteering? Please reach out. The Advocates for Human Rights has an opportunity for you.

    Eager to see change? Give to our mission, our vision, our work. Your gift matters.

    This post was originally published on The Advocates Post.

  • Governments that issue press releases about the abuse of human rights tend to avoid close gazes at the mirror.  Doing so would be telling.  In the case of Australia, its record on dealing with refugees is both abysmal and cruel.  It tends to be easier to point the finger at national security laws in Hong Kong and concentration camps in Xinjiang.  Wickedness is always easily found afar.

    Australia’s own concentration camp system hums along, inflicting suffering upon asylum seekers and refugees who fled suffering by keeping them in a state of calculated limbo.  Its brutality has been so normalised, it barely warrants mention in Australia’s sterile news outlets.  In penitence, the country’s literary establishment pays homage to the victims, such as the Kurdish Iranian writer Behrouz Boochani.  Garlands and literary prizes have done nothing to shift the vicious centre in Canberra.  Boat arrivals remain political slurry and are treated accordingly.

    Recently, there were small signs that prevalent amnesia and indifference were being disturbed.  The fate of some 200 refugees and asylum seekers brought to the Australian mainland for emergency medical treatment piqued the interest of certain activists.  Prior to its repeal as part of a secret arrangement between the Morrison government and Tasmanian senator Jacqui Lambie in December last year, the medical evacuation law was a mixed blessing.

    While it was championed as a humanitarian instrument, it did not ensure one iota of freedom.  As before, limbo followed like a dank smell.  The repeal of the legislation offered another prospect of purgatory, only this time on the mainland.

    The individuals in question have found themselves detained in Melbourne at the Mantra Bell City Hotel in Preston, and the Kangaroo Point Central Hotel in Brisbane.   In the mind of Refugee Action Coalition spokesman Ian Rintoul, the conditions at both abodes are more restrictive than those on Nauru.  The medical help promised has also been tardily delivered, if at all.

    “My life is exactly the size of a room, and a narrow corridor,” reflects Mostafa (Moz) Azimitabar, who has been detained at the Mantra for 13 months.  Like his fellow detainees, he has become a spectacle, able to see protesters gather outside the hotel, the signs pleading for their release, drivers honking in solidarity.  He sees himself as “a fish inside an aquarium … The whole of my life in this window to see the real life, where people are driving, walking; when they wave to us.  And when I wave back at them.  This is my life.”

    When former Australian soccer player turned human rights activist Craig Foster visited Azimitabar, conversation could only take place between a transparent plastic barrier.  “I had to talk with him behind the glass,” tweeted the detainee.  “Several times a day Serco officers enter my room and there aren’t any glasses for them.”

    After the visit, Foster described the corrosion of liberties, “this constant theme of the most onerous regulations … constantly chipping away – just taking another right, another right, another right, and making them feel less and less and less human, if that’s possible after eight years.”

    The more obstreperous refugees have been targeted by the Department of Home Affairs and forcibly relocated.  Iranian refugee Farhad Rahmati found himself shifted from Kangaroo Point to the Brisbane Immigration Transit Accommodation Centre (BITA), and then to Villawood.  BITA also received four more from Kangaroo Point in mid-November.

    The advent of COVID-19 compounded the situation.  Detainees already vulnerable to other medical conditions faced another danger.  The authorities gave a big shrug.  Shared bathrooms are the norm and are infrequently cleaned.  Hand sanitizer containers are left empty or broken.  The inquiry into the failure of Victoria’s quarantine system that led to a second infectious wave in Melbourne avoided considering the conditions of detained refugees.  Writing in Eureka Street, Andra Jackson wondered if this had anything to do with the fact “that these men, now detained in some instances for six to seven years, have behaved more responsibly that [sic] some returning travellers.”

    The government authorities did release five refugees from the medevac hotels last week, threatened by lawsuits testing the legal status of their detention.  On December 14, the 60 men detained at the Mantra were told that they would be moving to another undisclosed location.  The conclusion of the contract with the hotel has the Department of Home Affairs considering its options, and all are bound to aggravate the distress of the detainees.

    Alison Battinson of Human Rights for All has a suggestion bound to be ignored.  “Instead of telling the gentlemen that they are going to be moved to another place of detention – that hasn’t been disclosed to them – the more sensible approach would be to release them as per the law.”

    The only ray of compassion in this mess of inhumanity has come in the form of a Canadian resettlement scheme.  Nine refugees have already availed themselves of the opportunity; another twenty await their fate.  Australian politicians, as they so often do on this subject, are nowhere to be found.

    The post Abuse on the Mainland: Australia’s Medevac Hotel Detentions first appeared on Dissident Voice.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • A LETTER FROM HRI’S EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BILL HOLSTON

    December 10 is Human Rights Day. It celebrates the day when the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was adopted.  The very first article is:  

    All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.  

    For twenty years, HRI has been fighting to make those words a reality. 

    Those words were shaped by women activists: Indian delegate Hansa Mehta, champion of women’s rights in her home country, revised the phrase “All men are born free and equal” to “All human beings are born free and equal,” to make it less patriarchal. She, Eleanor Roosevelt, and a fierce group of women were instrumental in ensuring that the Universal of Declaration of Human Rights is what we know today. 

    On our twentieth birthdaywe celebrate women’s role in shaping the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in part because it mirrors our own founding, which was born of two women: Betsy Healy, aattorney, and Serena Connelly, a social worker. Today, as has often been the case for the last twenty years, our staff (other than me) are all fierce intelligent women justice warriors. They fight every day to assist our clients obtain the legal status which is so key to our clients futures. 

    When I was a lawyer in private practice, I was drawn to HRI as a volunteer because I knew that this organization was founded by strong, competent and compassionate women and I wanted to be a part of their work. It’s the reason I took pro bono cases from HRI, and the reason I was and remain a financial supporter.  I was thankful for the meaning it gave my life. Many of our volunteers experience this same satisfaction.

    All of us are drawn to this work with a deep respect for our clients. Every day we see the resilience of the women who are escaping domestic violence; the pro-democracy activists, who have freely stood up against oppression; the children making the brave and harrowing journey to seek a life free of violence and abuse; and the brave LGBTQIA individuals fighting for the right to live their authentic life.  We approach this work in deep appreciation of bearing witness to their bravery and resourcefulness. 

    The last year of fighting against the white nationalist agenda of our government during a global pandemic has been extremely difficult, but we are heartened by the example of our clients, and, of course the support we receive from our community. 

    Eleanor Roosevelt, one of the primary proponents of the UDHR said: 

    “Where, after all, do universal human rights begin? In small places, close to home – so close and so small that they cannot be seen on any maps of the world. Yet they are the world of the individual person; the neighborhood he lives in; the school or college he attends; the factory, farm or office where he works. Such are the places where every man, woman and child seeks equal justice, equal opportunity, equal dignity without discrimination. Unless these rights have meaning there, they have little meaning anywhere. Without concerned citizen action to uphold them close to home, we shall look in vain for progress in the larger world.” 

    I am thankful to go to work every day with strong women who have taken up that challenge. This is what makes this organization great, and one which continues to live up to the vision of our founders. Stand with us!

    With respect,

    Bill Holston

    Executive Director, HRI

     

    The post 72 Years of Human Rights Day; 20 Years of HRI appeared first on Human Rights Initiative.

    This post was originally published on Blog – Human Rights Initiative.

  • The U.S.-Mexico border remains largely closed to migrants because of the coronavirus pandemic. But the number of illegal border crossings is way up — and so are expulsions.

    MICHEL MARTIN, HOST:

    We’re going to head now to the U.S.-Mexico border, which remains largely closed to migrants because of the coronavirus pandemic. But the number of illegal border crossings is way up and so are expulsions. As Alisa Reznick of Arizona Public Media reports, migrants are desperate to escape conditions in desolate Mexican border towns.

    ALISA REZNICK, BYLINE: Eighteen-year-old Roberto was terrified of crossing the Sonoran Desert in southern Arizona.

    ROBERTO: (Through interpreter) Yes, I was very afraid. I heard many people die in that desert because of dehydration and because they were bitten by a snake.

    REZNICK: Roberto fled gang violence in El Salvador to find a new life with an uncle in the U.S. He asked that we not use his last name because he fears for his life. Twice, he crossed the border, illegally, and twice he got caught. U.S. Border Patrol agents immediately sent him back to Sasabe in Mexico under pandemic-era protocols that allow agents to rapidly expel most migrants with no due process. Gail Kocourek with the humanitarian aid group Tucson Samaritans says migrants like Roberto desperately want out of Sasabe.

    GAIL KOCOUREK: What are you going to do? I could sit here and starve, or I could try to go into the States, where my family is or my friends are.

    REZNICK: More than 66,000 migrant apprehensions took place at the Southwest border in October, four times the number in April. Data also suggests people are trying to cross, illegally, more than once and in more remote and dangerous places. In Arizona, this year marked a grim milestone. The remains of 200 migrants were found in the desert borderland, the most in almost a decade. Mark Morgan, acting commissioner of Customs and Border Protection, insists the pandemic protocols are needed to safeguard public health.

    MARK MORGAN: CBP has removed more than 300,000 migrants, all who were at potential risk of further introducing COVID in the United States, helping to avoid and prevent a COVID catastrophe.

    REZNICK: But the new protocols may actually be driving crossings higher. That’s because the process is so streamlined that migrants are no longer charged with illegal entry, meaning people have little reason not to try over and over again. And now the Border Patrol doesn’t give most migrants a chance to make their case in court. Instead, they’re simply dropped off in Mexico. That includes remote places like Sasabe, a hotbed for organized crime and smugglers.

    DORA RODRIGUEZ: All they do is they take the fingerprint, they process them, and then they ship back to a town where we know there is no resources for them.

    REZNICK: Dora Rodriguez is an aid worker in Tucson who makes regular trips to the border to help migrants. She says resources in larger cities, like legal aid, are nonexistent in Sasabe. The nearest migrant shelter is more than 70 miles away.

    RODRIGUEZ: (Speaking Spanish).

    REZNICK: On a recent trip there, Rodriguez and other volunteers with Tucson Samaritans handed out winter jackets and socks to a group of Guatemalan migrants. She says it’s normal to see the Border Patrol drop off 100 people a day in Sasabe. Most are dehydrated and hungry. Some have blisters on their feet and tattered shoes.

    RODRIGUEZ: (Speaking Spanish).

    REZNICK: Forty years ago, Rodriguez braved the desert herself. She fled the civil war in El Salvador and almost died trekking through the Arizona borderland. She was rescued by the Border Patrol. Now she says asylum seekers in her situation would simply be turned away.

    RODRIGUEZ: I never thought that I would be living what I see now in this country, never because this is a country of hope, right? This is a country of freedom, but it’s not at this moment.

    REZNICK: Rodriguez met Roberto, the Salvadoran teen, in September after he’d been expelled. They developed a kinship and kept in touch. They’re from the same hometown. Roberto has gone back home. I reached him on WhatsApp and asked why he returned.

    ROBERTO: (Speaking Spanish).

    REZNICK: He says he ran out of money to pay the coyotes and didn’t want to suffer again. And knowing, at least for now, that there’s no chance of asking for asylum, he’s not sure when he’ll try to come again.

    For NPR News, I’m Alisa Reznick in Tucson.

    This post was originally published on Refugees.

  • Thanksgiving is a time for gratitude. We are grateful for all the good that we have experienced this year, from food to family to moments of joy. We are also grateful for the strength that has enabled us to confront profound challenges in our lives, our country and around the globe.

    The post Gratitude and Action for a Just World: a Thanksgiving Guide appeared first on American Jewish World Service – AJWS.

    This post was originally published on American Jewish World Service – AJWS.

  • Originally published on The Intercept

    Ryan Devereaux
    September 5 2020, 4:00 a.m.

    A short walk from the border, in the Mexican city of Nogales, Sonora, sits a modest building packed with long, cafeteria-style tables. The comedor, as it’s known locally, is clean and inviting, with space for up to 60 guests. The walls are decorated with hand-painted images of Christ and his apostles, done in the style of a children’s book. Tucked away in one corner of the room are medical supplies, stacked and organized in plastic bins. Sister María Engracia Robles Robles, a nun with the Missionary Sisters of the Eucharist, floats from the kitchen into the common area, serving hot breakfast and lunch to anyone who needs it.

    The comedor was born out of work Robles and two other nuns began in 2006. At the time, Arizona was the epicenter of migration along the border and the site of a major humanitarian crisis. While people headed north were dying in the desert in record numbers, a growing deportation machine was sending a steady flow of survivors to Nogales. The nuns began feeding the deportees out of the trunks of their cars. In 2008, they secured the property where the comedor now stands. Officially run by a coalition of organizations known as the Kino Border Initiative, its first iteration had no walls. There was no relief from the desert heat. When the monsoons came, the nuns walked through standing water to serve food.

    In years past, the guests were almost all recently deported Mexican men. That’s no longer the case. Sitting in the corner of the comedor on a bright, clear morning in late February, I watched as a long line of families from Guatemala, Honduras, and other countries in Latin America and across the world walked through the front door. They filled the benches, packed shoulder to shoulder. Many came by bus from Ciudad Juarez, crossing contested cartel territory where a Mormon family was massacred just a few months prior.

    Once the parents and kids were settled in, Sister Robles went around the room asking them what they were thankful for. As I scribbled a man’s answer in my notebook — to be with his daughter — a little girl in a pink jumper handed me an empty tube of Chapstick, then a tiny figurine of a woman in a green dress, then a broken blue crayon. She smiled as she shared her treasures one by one. The girl and her sister were from Chilpancingo, her mother later told me, a Mexican city in the state of Guerrero, not far from the town where 43 students were disappeared by police in 2014. It was the violence, the mother said, that caused them to leave.

    I was halfway through a three-week reporting trip from one end of the border to the other when I stopped at the comedor. The aim of the trip was to take stock of the Trump administration’s impact after three and a half years in office, to spend time with those caught in the crosshairs of the president’s policies, and to check in with the border-wide network of immigration attorneys, humanitarian aid workers, and asylum advocates by their side. From Matamoros to Juarez, from Nogales to Tijuana, I had heard stories from asylum-seeking families who were drowning in a system of punishment, power, and exclusion, vast in both its scope and viciousness. They were running from one form of violence into another, slamming headfirst into the most gleefully anti-immigrant government in modern American history. Across the border, everyone seemed to agree: This moment was different, and it was hard to imagine that things could get any worse.The coronavirus presented the architects of Trump’s border policies with the pretext to shut down the border and choke off asylum once and for all.

    The months that followed upended that notion. The coronavirus presented the architects of Donald Trump’s border policies with a remarkable opportunity, a real-world emergency that would provide the pretext to shut down the border and choke off asylum once and for all. With Covid-19 swiftly cast as a foreign invader, the president, vying for reelection, returned to the narrative that helped land him in the White House in the first place. Border Patrol agents began throwing people back by the thousands, tossing men, women, and children across the international divide without a trace of due process. With hearings postponed and canceled, the wait grew increasingly indefinite and uncertain for the roughly 60,000 individuals in the administration’s Remain in Mexico program, many of them young families stuck in the continent’s most dangerous cities — places where more than 1,000 people had already been kidnapped, assaulted, or murdered.

    With the administration pushing asylum-seekers back into Mexico, jails and detention centers run by Immigration and Customs Enforcement were becoming blackholes where it seemed the only way out was deportation. By late February, three weeks before Trump declared the coronavirus a national emergency, Linda Rivas, executive director of the legal advocacy organization Las Americas in El Paso, Texas, was among a small group of attorneys still making trips into Juarez to meet with clients. “There are no eyes on the detention centers right now,” she told me at the time. “The conditions are really deteriorating.”

    For more than three decades, Las Americas has provided legal representation to migrants. Rivas and her colleagues have seen their share of suffering on the border. Still, she said, the Trump years had managed to produce “some of the hardest, darkest, most difficult times in our history.” Front-line advocates were reaching a breaking point. “We need some level of hope,” Rivas said. “The question of what comes next is utterly terrifying.”

    An Unsettling Reality

    A U.S. Customs and Border Protection agent standing in the U.S. is seen from the Mexican side of the international bridge as people wait to be allowed to cross into the country in Matamoros, Mexico on Feb. 13, 2020.

    A U.S. Customs and Border Protection agent standing in the U.S. is seen from the Mexican side of the international bridge as people wait to be allowed to cross into the country in Matamoros, Mexico, on Feb. 13, 2020.

    Photo: Veronica G. Cardenas for The Intercept

    Standing outside the comedor, I met Hushbaht Fahriev, a 29-year-old Muslim man from Siberia. Fahriev explained how Islamophobic policing and skinhead violence prompted him and his wife to grab their two toddler-aged children and flee halfway around the world. Fahriev had been in Nogales with the kids for five months. From a rented room not far from the comedor, he was making progress teaching himself English and Spanish, but there was no hiding that he was a foreigner. Just a couple weeks earlier, five men wearing tactical vests and carrying assault rifles stopped Fahriev as he was walking out of a corner store. They asked where he was from.

    “I told them I don’t speak Spanish well and I keep walking,” Fahriev recalled. One of the men bashed him over the head with his weapon. The man continued striking him as Fahriev tried to explain that he could not communicate. The beating eventually stopped, and the men jumped into a truck and sped off. Fahriev called the police and gave them the make and model of the vehicle, as well as its license number. The police did nothing with the information, he said. “Be careful,” Fahriev recalled the cops saying. “Here is dangerous.”The fact that a scaled-up, permanent base of operations was now considered necessary confirmed an unsettling reality: The crisis wasn’t going anywhere.

    Across the street from Kino’s old comedor stood the organization’s new, soon-to-be-opened facility. The men’s dorm could house 70 people overnight. There was an additional dorm for women and children, and another for transgender travelers. A local quilting group donated handmade blankets for the beds, and there were dedicated spaces for computer-aided job and English training, mental health counseling, and legal support. Walking the empty halls of the state-of-the-art shelter, it was clear that the humanitarian community of Nogales had much to celebrate. Compared to the refugee camp in Matamoros that I had visited a few days earlier, this was like something from another dimension. Still, when volunteers began their work in the city more than a decade ago, there was hope was that the need would be temporary. The fact that a scaled-up, permanent base of operations was now considered necessary confirmed an unsettling reality: The crisis wasn’t going anywhere.

    At around 2 p.m., a car pulled up outside the new shelter. The woman I was waiting for had arrived.

    Dora Rodriguez was smiling as she opened her door. With chestnut hair pulled back behind her head, she wore a royal blue shirt emblazoned with the name of her organization: Salvavision.

    “I’m never at my work!” Rodriguez said with a laugh, as she stepped into the midday sun. Rodriguez is a full-time social worker. The border work is her voluntary, chosen vocation. It was a Monday, which meant that the 60-year-old was in the midst of her weekly routine, visiting southern Arizona detention centers, where she provides translation services for legal advocates and takes supplies across the border to migrant shelters in Nogales. Through the windshield, I could see her vehicle was stuffed with boxes and bags, overflowing with children’s toys and personal hygiene items. Across the street, a line for lunch was beginning to form at the comedor. Normally, Rodriguez radiates with a warm and glowing smile, but when she turned to look at the growing crowd of families, her demeanor turned grave. She had never seen anything like it, she told me. Driving to a shelter deeper in Nogales, Rodriguez pointed to a graveyard where a group of Honduran men had been sleeping the last time she was in town. She recalled how one of the men told her that his number in the Remain in Mexico waiting line was 4,425. She knew his case was likely to fail. It was the same for just about everybody coming to the border these days. It seemed nobody had the kind of evidence the government was requiring.

    TUCSON, AZ - MARCH 13, 2020:Dora Rodriguez keeps donated items for asylum seekers in her home in Tucson, Arizona on March 13, 2020. She makes individual care packages from the donated items and then distributes them on a weekly basis to asylum seekers in Nogales, Mexico.In 1980 19-year-old Dora Rodriguez, from El Salvador, made the difficult journey of crossing into the US near Lukeville, AZ on foot. Of the 26 individuals she crossed the Sonoran desert with 13 died in the gruelling heat, one of the pre-eminent events that led to the Sanctuary Movement. Dora eventually naturalised in the US and started an advocacy group, Salvavision Rescue Arizona, to support asylum-seekers. On a weekly basis Dora visits asylum seekers in detention centres, writes them letters, fundraises and brings donated supplies to the migrant camps on the Mexican side of the US - Mexico border. Photo by Kitra Cahana/MAPS for The Intercept

    Dora Rodriguez keeps donated items for asylum-seekers in her home in Tucson, Ariz., on March 13, 2020. She makes individual care packages from the donated items and then distributes them on a weekly basis to asylum-seekers in Nogales, Mexico.

    Photo: Kitra Cahana/MAPS for The Intercept

    “And even if they have it,” Rodriguez said, “it’s not enough — it’s just not what they’re doing at this moment.”

    Winding through the back streets of the border town, Rodriguez described a call she received last winter, when she was driving home from one of the detention centers. It was a Tucson humanitarian aid volunteer seeking help on a case involving an asylum-seeking family from Venezuela. The family had managed to get paroled into the U.S., but their daughter, who happened to turn 18 that day, did not, on the grounds that she was now an adult. She was separated from her parents and taken to detention. Nearly two months later, that’s where she remained. “It was Christmas Eve,” Rodriguez said.

    “There is no mercy,” she told me. “None.”

    Mercy and Hardship

    When Dora Rodriguez speaks of mercy and hardship on the border, she does so from personal experience. The efforts she makes in the shelters and the detention centers is her way of working through that experience.

    In 1980, when Rodriguez was 19 years old, she fled El Salvador in hopes of finding refuge in the United States. A civil war was raging. The U.S.-backed regime was torturing, disappearing, and killing civilians by the thousands. Rodriguez’s town came under government attack. The head of her church youth group was murdered in front of her. With three of her friends already disappeared, Rodriguez knew there was no time to waste. She joined up with a group of refugees who were told that, for a price, they could be safely taken across the border in Arizona and flown to California.

    On a scorching hot Fourth of July weekend, Rodriguez and more than two dozen other refugees, including three sisters, ages 12, 14, and 16, were taken into the Sonoran Desert. Expecting to be flown west, some of the women brought rolling luggage and wore dresses and high heels. The young sisters were told that they would be reunited with their mother.

    The refugees were abandoned by their guide soon after they crossed. They spent days wandering the Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument, one of the most unforgiving landscapes in the Western hemisphere, in 120-degree temperatures. Their water was gone in no time, and they resorted to drinking lotion, shaving cream, and their own urine. Hallucination set in, and one by one they began to die. The hair on Rodriguez’s head burned from the heat. Desperate and delirious, she awoke on the sixth day to the sound of hooves and helicopters — a Border Patrol rescue party. Of the 26 refugees who set off on the journey, 13 were dead. A photographer on hand for their dramatic rescue snapped an image of Rodriguez, limp in a Border Patrol agent’s arms, that made newspapers around the world.

    TUCSON, AZ - MARCH 13, 2020:Detail of a bracelet that says 'DORITA' that an asylum seeker in an ICE detention facility made out of plastic bags for Dora Rodriguez. In 1980 19-year-old Dora Rodriguez, from El Salvador, made the difficult journey of crossing into the US near Lukeville, AZ on foot. Of the 26 individuals she crossed the Sonoran desert with 13 died in the gruelling heat, one of the pre-eminent events that led to the Sanctuary Movement. Dora eventually naturalised in the US and started an advocacy group, Salvavision Rescue Arizona, to support asylum-seekers. On a weekly basis Dora visits asylum seekers in detention centres, writes them letters, fundraises and brings donated supplies to the migrant camps on the Mexican side of the US - Mexico border. Photo by Kitra Cahana/MAPS for The Intercept
    TUCSON, AZ - MARCH 13, 2020:Dora Rodriguez holds the only photograph she has of herself from the days following her gruelling journey through the Sonoran desert as a young asylum seeker.In 1980 19-year-old Dora Rodriguez, from El Salvador, made the difficult journey of crossing into the US near Lukeville, AZ on foot. Of the 26 individuals she crossed the Sonoran desert with 13 died in the gruelling heat, one of the pre-eminent events that led to the Sanctuary Movement. Dora eventually naturalised in the US and started an advocacy group, Salvavision Rescue Arizona, to support asylum-seekers. On a weekly basis Dora visits asylum seekers in detention centres, writes them letters, fundraises and brings donated supplies to the migrant camps on the Mexican side of the US - Mexico border. Photo by Kitra Cahana/MAPS for The Intercept

    Left/Top: Detail of a bracelet that says, “DORITA” that an asylum-seeker in an ICE detention facility made out of plastic bags for Dora Rodriguez. Right/Bottom: Rodriguez holds the only photograph she has of herself from the days following her grueling journey through the Sonoran Desert as a young asylum-seeker.Photos: Kitra Cahana/MAPS for The Intercept

    The deaths on Organ Pipe were a turning point in southern Arizona. The tragedy exposed how the U.S. government was systematically and illegally denying asylum to Salvadorans and Guatemalans — people fleeing governments the United States was backing. Those denials sparked the Sanctuary Movement, a campaign modeled after the Underground Railroad in which faith leaders in Tucson defied the federal government and moved thousands of refugees into houses of worship across the United States. The movement’s founders went on to create some of Arizona’s most well-established humanitarian organizations, which today work alongside the Kino Border Initiative and Casas Alitas, a Tucson-based organization, to provide care for border crossers in the Sonoran Desert. Among them is No More Deaths, a collective of volunteers who leave water for migrants crossing the desert and conduct search-and-recovery operations in the borderlands, and whom Trump administration prosecutors have repeatedly tried — and failed — to shut down and imprison.

    Rodriguez’s integration into Arizona’s humanitarian scene was slow at first. In the wake of their rescue, she and the other refugees were held as material witnesses against their smugglers, before the government moved to deport them back to El Salvador. None were given asylum, though Rodriguez eventually gained citizenship through marriage. She worked in fast-food restaurants and warehouses, took night classes, and taught herself English. She put herself through college and had five children, all U.S. citizens. For years, Rodriguez stayed quiet about her story, a fact she attributes to an abusive marriage. When she left that relationship, some 13 years ago, she began to find her voice.“This is how I really heal from my own experience. There is no way I would ever not do this.”

    On matters of immigration policy, Rodriguez’s view of Trump’s predecessor is hardly rosy. The Obama administration deported more people than any government in U.S. history, including more than 150,000 Salvadorans, many with deep roots in the country. But when Trump descended his golden escalator in Manhattan in 2015, announcing his run for president by claiming that Mexico was sending “rapists” and criminals across the border, Rodriguez felt a shift. Drawing from a politically potent well of anti-immigrant hate, Trump would fuse racist rhetoric, including his later talk of “shit-hole countries,” with a real-world crackdown. Rodriguez wasn’t having it.

    The election, for Rodriguez, was a turning point. In the spring of 2019, she returned to the patch of desert where she was rescued — this time with a local news crew. “I told myself I cannot just keep my story to myself anymore because my story brings volunteers, it brings people,” she explained. That fall, Rodriguez flew to Washington, D.C. with No More Deaths volunteer Scott Warren, a geographer whom the government was then trying to send to prison on felony smuggling charges. The case fell apart in November, and the government abruptly dropped its remaining charges in February. Rodriguez told lawmakers and human rights groups about her experience of the humanitarian crisis on the border, both as an asylum-seeker and an advocate. The moment was as urgent as any she had ever seen and for her, inaction was out of the question.

    “This is how I really heal from my own experience,” she told me. “There is no way I would ever not do this.”

    Voices From the Desert

    TUCSON, AZ - MARCH 14, 2020:Dora Rodriguez receives donations from Peggie Felici-Gessner, a volunteer at the Casa Alitas shelter that caters to asylum seekers in Tucson, Arizona on March 14, 2020. Ever since President Trump enacted the Remain in Mexico policy shelters on the U.S. side of the border have been trying to get their supplies and donations to camps in Nogales and other border cities where asylum seekers are living. In 1980 19-year-old Dora Rodriguez, from El Salvador, made the difficult journey of crossing into the US near Lukeville, AZ on foot. Of the 26 individuals she crossed the Sonoran desert with 13 died in the gruelling heat, one of the pre-eminent events that led to the Sanctuary Movement. Dora eventually naturalized in the US and started an advocacy group, Salvavision Rescue Arizona, to support asylum-seekers. On a weekly basis Dora visits asylum seekers in detention, writes them letters, fundraises and brings donated supplies to the migrant camps on the Mexican side of the US - Mexico border. Photo by Kitra Cahana/MAPS for The Intercept

    Dora Rodriguez receives donations from Peggie Felici-Gessner, a volunteer at the Casa Alitas shelter that caters to asylum-seekers in Tucson, Ariz., on March 14, 2020.

    Photo: Kitra Cahana/MAPS for The Intercept
    The disembodied voices were piped in from private jails in the desert outside of town. The judge stared into his lap, looking half-dead as he repeated the same script over and over, pausing to allow a Spanish translator to relay his words for each new detainee.

    The voice that Rodriguez was waiting for would come from the shrublands between Phoenix and Tucson, from a dusty community where incarceration keeps the economy afloat and the biggest employer in town is a for-profit prison corporation.

    In the years leading up to Trump’s inauguration, La Palma Correctional Center, run by the private prison giant CoreCivic and located in the town of Eloy, Arizona, saw more deaths in custody than any ICE detention center in the country — 15 in a 14-year period, several of them suicides. Rodriguez was a regular visitor to the facility through her translation work with Keep Tucson Together, an immigrant rights legal collective. In the past year, she had become particularly invested in the fate of one young man being held there, a Salvadoran asylum-seeker named Francisco.

    Rodriguez first learned of Francisco’s case through a documentary film crew, who had uncovered the tragic story of a young man who died attempting to cross Organ Pipe in 2019 — the same deadly stretch of desert where Rodriguez and the others were rescued. In addition to a wife and two young children, Oscar Alfredo Gomez left behind his best friend at a shelter in the Mexican border town of Sonoyta — 26-year-old Francisco. It was rare, Rodriguez told me, that she found a Salvadoran in as dire of straits as Francisco. She insisted upon meeting the young man.RelatedMass Immigration Prosecutions on the Border Are Currently on Hold. What Comes Next Is Uncertain.

    “This could be my son,” Rodriguez told herself last August, when the two finally met. “I have to help him.” From her home in Tucson, Rodriguez kept up with Francisco in the weeks that followed, explaining through text messages how she could help him get on his feet if he returned to El Salvador. She implored him not to attempt a crossing — if anyone understood the dangers of the desert, it was her. Francisco promised that he wouldn’t do it but in late September, his messages stopped coming. Days passed without word. “I went nuts,” Rodriguez recalled. She called every organization she could think of. “I knew he was lost in the desert.” Finally, in early October, she received a call from the Salvadoran consulate: Francisco was alive and in U.S. custody at La Palma. “That was, oh my God, the best news ever,” Rodriguez said, but when she tried to reach Francisco’s uncle — who was living in the U.S. and who Francisco believed would step forward as a legal sponsor — her calls went unreturned and unanswered. Francisco, it seemed, was on his own.

    When Rodriguez first came to the U.S. as a traumatized 19-year-old with nobody to turn to, a Mexican family in Tucson took her in. She lived with them for more than year. “They became my second family,” she said. The kindness she was shown made the life she now lives possible. Considering the situation Francisco was facing, Rodriguez asked the legal team at No More Deaths, with whom she volunteers much of her time, if she could step forward as a sponsor for an asylum-seeker. The answer she received was yes.

    Sitting on a bench in a window-less room in a courthouse in downtown Tucson, waiting for Francisco’s name to be called, Rodriguez rustled through her paperwork and took notes when the cases of men she knew came up. She winced when a young man she had spoken to the day before quietly requested his deportation — he couldn’t take it anymore, she whispered to me.

    TUCSON, AZ - MARCH 13, 2020:Detail of items that Dora Rodriguez collected in July 2019 from the site where she was rescued in 1980 as a young asylum seeker crossing the Sonoran desert. Dora went back to the location with artist Alvaro Enciso in order to lay a cross at the site.In 1980 19-year-old Dora Rodriguez, from El Salvador, made the difficult journey of crossing into the US near Lukeville, AZ on foot. Of the 26 individuals she crossed the Sonoran desert with 13 died in the gruelling heat, one of the pre-eminent events that led to the Sanctuary Movement. Dora eventually naturalised in the US and started an advocacy group, Salvavision Rescue Arizona, to support asylum-seekers. On a weekly basis Dora visits asylum seekers in detention centres, writes them letters, fundraises and brings donated supplies to the migrant camps on the Mexican side of the US - Mexico border. Photo by Kitra Cahana/MAPS for The Intercept
    TUCSON, AZ - MARCH 13, 2020: Detail of items that Dora Rodriguez collected in July 2019 from the site where she was rescued in 1980 as a young asylum seeker crossing the Sonoran desert. Dora went back to the location with artist Alvaro Enciso in order to lay a cross at the site. In 1980 19-year-old Dora Rodriguez, from El Salvador, made the difficult journey of crossing into the US near Lukeville, AZ on foot. Of the 26 individuals she crossed the Sonoran desert with 13 died in the gruelling heat, one of the pre-eminent events that led to the Sanctuary Movement. Dora eventually naturalised in the US and started an advocacy group, Salvavision Rescue Arizona, to support asylum-seekers. On a weekly basis Dora visits asylum seekers in detention centres, writes them letters, fundraises and brings donated supplies to the migrant camps on the Mexican side of the US - Mexico border.  Photo by Kitra Cahana/MAPS for The Intercept

    Detail of items that Dora Rodriguez collected in July 2019 from the site where she was rescued in 1980 as a young asylum-seeker crossing the Sonoran Desert. Rodriguez went back to the location with artist Alvaro Enciso in order to lay a cross at the site.Photo: Kitra Cahana/MAPS for The Intercept

    Finally, the judge read Francisco’s name out loud. Rodriguez sat up tall when his attorney noted her presence in the courtroom, an affirmation of her willingness to act as his legal sponsor — of all the detainees whose cases would be heard that day, Francisco was the only one with a lawyer or support network present.

    Rodriguez hoped her presence would sway the court to set a bond that would be realistically payable. Her odds were not good — under Trump, ICE’s propensity for keeping detainees locked up had exploded, and immigration judges had shown themselves to be crucial allies in the agency’s efforts. Francisco’s attorney implored the judge to set bond at $3,000. The ICE prosecutor sought a payment of more than three times that. The judge split the difference, setting a $7,000 bond.

    Rodriguez was elated as she headed for the courthouse elevators — this was an amount that could conceivably be raised. The question now was how.For the people I met, the virus was background noise, barely audible over the roar of the primary emergency: the state of the border itself.

    While Rodriguez applied herself to the task at hand, the country was slipping ever faster into a moment of historic change. The implications of the coronavirus were coming into focus. Deaths in Washington state were mounting. The White House was receiving alarming intelligence detailing the threat the Covid-19 posed, though the public wouldn’t learn about the reports until weeks later. Still, for the people I met — from Matamoros to Nogales to Tijuana — the virus was background noise, barely audible over the roar of the primary emergency: the state of the border itself.

    When I drove out of Tucson on the final weekend of February, bound for the West Coast, news broke of a major federal injunction halting the Remain in Mexico program. Across the border, advocates and asylum-seekers scrambled to respond. In Matamoros, families staying in the refugee camp headed for the bridge to Brownsville, Texas. The force field the Trump government was using to repel asylum-seekers had gone down — how long it would last was anybody’s guess. Racing west along Interstate 8, I drove straight for Tijuana.

    It was dark by the time the families appeared at the El Chaparral port of entry, asylum-seekers from across Central and South America. With children bundled in their warmest winter coats, they hurried down the corridor that led to the U.S. Many of the parents carried plastic folders, stuffed with the critical documents that told their story. Several clutched printed copies of the injunction. As they approached the port entrance, a friend and fellow reporter read a piece of breaking news aloud off his phone: The injunction had been stayed. Remain in Mexico was back on. A handful of the families with grave medical conditions were permitted entry. Most were not.

    The weekend began with asylum-seekers across the border believing that change had finally come. By Monday, the hope was all but gone. The White House was pushing forward with an ambitious plan to achieve a longstanding goal: lockdown of the U.S. border with Mexico. Stephen Miller, a senior White House adviser and principle architect of the president’s immigration and border enforcement policies, had been angling for way to link immigrants and disease as pretext for closing off immigration to the U.S. for years. His trademark fearmongering was all over Trump’s first major address on the coronavirus, broadcast from the Oval Office on March 12, which began by establishing that the virus was “foreign” before detailing a series of “sweeping travel restrictions” and laying blame on China and the European Union.

    After weeks of ignoring and downplaying the disease, Miller and Trump had returned to the framing they knew best.

    A Pandemic Pretext

    Three days after Trump’s Oval Office address, Rodriguez hosted a pair of film screenings at a church in Tucson, showcasing the documentary that had first led her to Francisco’s story.

    The fundraising efforts had been slow-going. If the people of Tucson could just see Francisco’s face and hear his words, Rodriguez thought, surely they would be moved to donate to his release. Unfortunately for her, the fundraiser coincided with Gov. Doug Ducey’s declaration of a state of emergency in Arizona. Just seven people showed up for the first screening. Disappointed and believing that no one would show up for the second, Rodriguez called it off.

    The following day, the Trump administration suspended all social visits to ICE detention centers. For those on the inside, it meant being cut off from the outside world at a moment of skyrocketing fear and anxiety, a time when the federal government’s own experts were warning that immigration detention was a “tinderbox” for the spread of Covid-19. For Rodriguez, it meant the loss of face-to-face interactions with people she cared about, including Francisco.

    If she could not physically visit the detention centers, Rodriguez reasoned, she would organize a letter-writing campaign to assure the people inside that they had not been forgotten, and she would keep taking their phone calls.Do you have a coronavirus story you want to share? Email us at coronavirus@theintercept.com or use one of these secure methods to contact a reporter.

    Listening to desperate people at the end of their rope had always been the most difficult part of Rodriguez’s work. As news of the virus reached the people locked in ICE jails, it became all the more draining. Rodriguez could hear the fear in their voices. With up to 150 people in a single unit, the arrival of the virus was not a matter of if, but when. There was no social distancing. Protests were met with retaliation. Meanwhile, Rodriguez’s goal of securing Francisco’s freedom was still far out of reach. After weeks of fundraising, she had pulled together about $3,000 in donations, a healthy sum but still far from what she needed.

    As Rodriguez was pressing forward with her humanitarian work, the White House announced that it would suspend all nonessential travel across the border, citing a rule issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In the 19 days after the rule was activated, the Border Patrol expelled nearly 10,000 people from the country, including asylum-seekers, families, and unaccompanied children, who in the past would have been protected from due process-free removal under federal law. For the first time since 1980, when Rodriguez and her companions fled north, asylum-seekers would be summarily expelled from the country without an opportunity to make their case. The interwoven cities of Nogales, Arizona, and Nogales, Sonora, braced to see how the rule would impact their binational lives. “The latest announcement uses the pandemic as a pretext to advance dangerous goals,” the advocates at the Kino Border Initiative said in a statement. “This is a moment to come together, recognize the ways in which we are connected, and care for one another.”

    TUCSON, AZ - MARCH 14, 2020: Attendees watch a screening of the documentary film 'Deserted' by filmmaker Jason Motlagh at the Grace St. Paul's Episcopal Church in Tucson, AZ, during a fundraiser to help raise $7000 to cover the bond for a young Salvadoran man currently in ICE detention on March 14, 2020.   In 1980 19-year-old Dora Rodriguez, from El Salvador, made the difficult journey of crossing into the US near Lukeville, AZ on foot. Of the 26 individuals she crossed the Sonoran desert with 13 died in the gruelling heat, one of the pre-eminent events that led to the Sanctuary Movement. Dora eventually naturalised in the US and started an advocacy group, Salvavision Rescue Arizona, to support asylum-seekers. On a weekly basis Dora visits asylum seekers in detention centres, writes them letters, fundraises and brings donated supplies to the migrant camps on the Mexican side of the US - Mexico border.  Photo by Kitra Cahana/MAPS for The Intercept
    TUCSON, AZ - MARCH 14, 2020: Attendees watch a screening of the documentary film 'Deserted' by filmmaker Jason Motlagh at the Grace St. Paul's Episcopal Church in Tucson, AZ, during a fundraiser to help raise $7000 to cover the bond for a young Salvadoran man currently in ICE detention on March 14, 2020.   In 1980 19-year-old Dora Rodriguez, from El Salvador, made the difficult journey of crossing into the US near Lukeville, AZ on foot. Of the 26 individuals she crossed the Sonoran desert with 13 died in the gruelling heat, one of the pre-eminent events that led to the Sanctuary Movement. Dora eventually naturalised in the US and started an advocacy group, Salvavision Rescue Arizona, to support asylum-seekers. On a weekly basis Dora visits asylum seekers in detention centres, writes them letters, fundraises and brings donated supplies to the migrant camps on the Mexican side of the US - Mexico border.  Photo by Kitra Cahana/MAPS for The Intercept

    Attendees watch a screening of the documentary “Deserted” by filmmaker Jason Motlagh at the Grace St. Paul’s Episcopal Church in Tucson, Ariz., during a fundraiser on March 14, 2020 to help raise $7,000 to cover the bond for a young Salvadoran man in ICE detention.Photo: Kitra Cahana/MAPS for The Intercept’

    Rodriguez wasn’t following the day’s news. On the morning Trump announced the border shutdown, she received a call from No More Deaths: The humanitarian group had decided to put up the remaining $4,000 for Francisco’s bond. Overjoyed, Rodriguez collected the donations and headed straight for La Palma. Sitting in her car in the detention center parking lot, the hours ticked away. Day turned to night. At approximately 9 p.m., a van pulled up. More than a half-dozen men were piled inside, shackled at the wrists and ankles, despite the fact that all were scheduled for release. Francisco was one of them.The decision to take Francisco in during the middle of a pandemic was logistically complicated but morally straightforward.

    ICE had stuffed the sum total of his belongings into a small plastic bag. He was released without shoelaces or socks, which meant that his first stop was the local Walmart. From there, Francisco was taken to his new home, where Rodriguez already had a room ready. He broke down as he took the space in. “I just can’t believe I’m out,” he said. “I can’t believe I’m here.” Francisco had emerged from La Palma physically and emotionally exhausted. For months, he worked in the detention center kitchen earning $1 a day. With her children grown and moved out, Rodriguez shares her small Tucson home with her husband. For the next two weeks, all three stayed inside, quarantining themselves, talking and telling stories.

    For Rodriguez, the decision to take Francisco in during the middle of a pandemic was logistically complicated — “We took the risk,” she acknowledged — but morally straightforward. She didn’t think twice about it.

    Systematic Punishment

    ELOY, AZ - APRIL 10, 2020: Dora Rodriguez participates in a car rally in front of the CoreCivic detention center in Eloy, Arizona on April 10, 2020. Activists demand that federal immigration authorities release all detainees from the CoreCivic detention centre. The request comes after people inside the facility tested positive for COVID-19. The protestors, who attempt to abide by social distancing rules by staying in their own cars honk their horns, chant and hold banners as they drive past the CoreCivic detention centre.  Photo by Kitra Cahana/MAPS for the Intercept

    Dora Rodriguez participates in a car rally in front of the CoreCivic detention center in Eloy, Ariz., on April 10, 2020. Activists demand that federal immigration authorities release all detainees from the CoreCivic detention centre.

    Photo: Kitra Cahana/MAPS for The Intercept
    By the time Francisco left La Palma, the men in his unit believed that the coronavirus had already arrived. Their fears were soon confirmed. In the weeks after Francisco’s release, La Palma and the adjacent Eloy Detention Center became two of the country’s leading hot spots for confirmed cases of Covid-19 in ICE custody, with more than 611 confirmed cases as of this reporting.

    In April, Rodriguez pulled on a mask and gloves and hopped in a car with her husband. Together, they joined a raucous caravan of more than 100 vehicles that descended on the detention center. As the demonstrators banged on pots and shouted to the people inside, Rodriguez’s phone rang — it was Nicaraguan man, one of Francisco’s friends, who was still locked inside. “Dorita!” he exclaimed. “We can hear you guys!”

    Day after day in the weeks that followed, ICE’s running tally of confirmed Covid-19 cases grew and grew, just as everyone with the faintest understanding of the agency’s record on controlling infectious disease predicted it would.RelatedAmid Coronavirus, Trump Moved to Expel Immigrants — But Border Patrol Didn’t Test Any of Them

    Outside the detention centers’ walls, advocates fought an uphill battle against soaring bonds and a system already predisposed to detention and deportation. Along the way, Francisco practiced his English with a woman Rodriguez knew from the humanitarian aid community. He spent a good deal of time in the kitchen, showcasing his cooking skills for Rodriguez and her husband. They bought him a bicycle, and he began to make friends in Tucson. Eventually, Rodriguez helped Francisco find an apartment and on June 1, he struck out on his own. He’s hoping to receive a work permit this month. For Rodriguez, the work goes on.

    At both Eloy and La Palma, more than 100 people in ICE custody wrote desperate letters in May and June, undercutting the agency’s claims that the coronavirus was under control and begging that they not be left to die. They described the numerous health conditions that placed those in custody at heightened risk and detailed detention center officials use of tear gas and pepper balls to coerce compliance from detainees. “It’s so heartbreaking getting those letters,” Rodriguez said. “You know they went through hell in there, and they’re still there and we’re still fighting to get them out.”

    ELOY, AZ - APRIL 10, 2020: Activists from across Arizona hold a car rally in front of the CoreCivic detention center in Eloy, Arizona on April 10, 2020 demanding that federal immigration authorities release all detainees from the CoreCivic detention centre. The request comes after people inside the facility tested positive for COVID-19. The protestors, who attempt to abide by social distancing rules by staying in their own cars honk their horns, chant and hold banners as they drive past the CoreCivic detention centre.  Photo by Kitra Cahana/MAPS for the Intercept
    ELOY, AZ - APRIL 10, 2020: Activists from across Arizona hold a car rally in front of the CoreCivic detention center in Eloy, Arizona on April 10, 2020 demanding that federal immigration authorities release all detainees from the CoreCivic detention centre. The request comes after people inside the facility tested positive for COVID-19. The protestors, who attempt to abide by social distancing rules by staying in their own cars honk their horns, chant and hold banners as they drive past the CoreCivic detention centre.  Photo by Kitra Cahana/MAPS for the Intercept

    Activists from across Arizona hold a car rally in front of the CoreCivic detention center in Eloy, Ariz., on April 10, 2020.Photo: Kitra Cahana/MAPS for The Intercept

    “It’s systematic and it’s punishment,” she added. “They want to break them. They want to break the pattern of them coming and asking for protection.” In the days of the Sanctuary Movement, asylum advocates referred to the bonds immigration authorities placed on asylum-seekers as “ransom money.” Forty years later, they remain one of the biggest challenges Rodriguez and the organizations she volunteers with face. In a conversation mid-summer, Rodriguez told me about the case of another young man from El Salvador that she was working on. “He’s only 19,” she said. “His bond is $30,000.”Paying bonds remains one of the biggest challenges Rodriguez and the organizations she volunteers with face.

    “Where in the hell are these people going to get this money?” she asked. “Even us, as volunteers, as humanitarians, it’s impossible. I’m willing to sign my credit, my bank account, whatever, and I tell them, I will sign to get you out, but the down payment is $10,000.”

    Not only is that an enormous amount of money for small, volunteer-driven organizations to pull together, but it must now also be raised at a time when tens of millions of Americans are out of work and millions of others are justifiably worried about their own financial security and the health and well-being of their own families.

    TUCSON, AZ - MARCH 13, 2020:Dora Rodriguez spends time with her grandson, Elijah, in her home in Tucson, Arizona on March 13, 2020.In 1980 19-year-old Dora Rodriguez, from El Salvador, made the difficult journey of crossing into the US near Lukeville, AZ on foot. Of the 26 individuals she crossed the Sonoran desert with 13 died in the gruelling heat, one of the pre-eminent events that led to the Sanctuary Movement. Dora eventually naturalised in the US and started an advocacy group, Salvavision Rescue Arizona, to support asylum-seekers. On a weekly basis Dora visits asylum seekers in detention centres, writes them letters, fundraises and brings donated supplies to the migrant camps on the Mexican side of the US - Mexico border. Photo by Kitra Cahana/MAPS for The Intercept

    Dora Rodriguez spends time with her grandson, Elijah, in her home in Tucson, Ariz., on March 13, 2020.

    Photo: Kitra Cahana/MAPS for The Intercept

    The challenge is immense and it would be easy to look out at a network of largely for-profit jails that chooses to lock away tens of thousands of people, many of them asylum-seekers seeking refuge, in the middle of global pandemic and conclude that nobody cares, but Rodriguez believes that doing so would be a mistake. “There’s a whole army behind these people,” she said. She is not wrong. The volunteers who pour time and energy into a collective effort to resist the detention and deportation machine are as much a fact of life on the border in the past four years as anything Stephen Miller has accomplished so far. In the end, their efforts might not be enough, but they are there and they are trying — they were doing it before Trump came to office and they will continue the work, if they must, when he’s gone. “That’s what really keeps me going,” Rodriguez said. “I am not in this alone. I do this with a community. I would never be able to do this alone.”

    On Fourth of July weekend, Rodriguez returned to the stretch of desert where she was rescued, and where the 13 men, women, and children she was traveling with lost their lives 40 years ago. With the sun blazing overhead, she retraced their steps the best she could and left a cross to honor their memories. “It was a promise that we’re going to continue,” she said. “We’re going to continue the fight. We cannot stop.”

    With the virus ripping through ICE facilities, Rodriguez’s phone hasn’t stopped ringing since we parted ways earlier this year — she estimates that she receives an average of 20 calls from people locked inside the detention centers each day. Not knowing if or when those individuals might call again, if it will be the last call they will ever make, she finds it impossible not to answer. She tells each of them the same thing: “You are not alone. We are here.”

    This post was originally published on Salvavision.

  • Meet Fransico a young migrant only 24 from El Salvador who has been in detention at La Palma for the past 6 months. Here he has been seeking protection from prosecution in El Salvador by the violent gangs. Fransisco’s best friend died trying to flee the same gangs in El Salvador last year in the hot AZ desert.

    We are joining forces as a community to help Francisco get out of detention by assisting him with his newly given bond of $7,000.  This young man has a heart of pure kindness and as Salvavision Rescue has been with him through his entire journey of trying to get asylum, we are here with him while he waits for his asylum case to be heard and to be able to be free and start a new life.

    With the help of other organizations such as No More Deaths,Keeping Tucson Together and the  Samaritans we will rally together to help Fransicio make his bond. 

    We appreciate you and please donate what you can- anything helps. We can’t thank our community and donors for your continuous generosity. Please share with your own communities and help Francisco find freedom and safety. 

    Once Fransicso is out on bond, Salvavision Rescue will be working with him to find a host family while he waits for his court hearing. Please visit our website and Facebook page to learn more about our mission and programs and other ways you can help our fellow migrant brothers and sisters. 

    This post was originally published on Salvavision.

  • Los Amuletos Migran (The Amulets Migrate), 2019

    Listen to migrants’ rights advocate Dora Rodriguez’s story of crossing the US-Mexico border in 1980 and the context and meaning she gives to Tom Kiefer’s collection of items that were taken from migrants at the border.

    About the Exhibition

    How we treat the most vulnerable—including migrants seeking a better life—defines our character as a nation. Drawn from the photographic series of the same name, El Sueño Americano | The American Dream: Photographs by Tom Kiefer asks us to consider how we treat migrants as a reflection of who we are and who we want to be as Americans. Responding to the dehumanizing treatment migrants face in detention, Kiefer carefully arranged and photographed objects seized and discarded by border officials—objects deemed “potentially lethal” or “non-essential” among a variety of belongings crucial for sustenance, hygiene, protection, comfort, and emotional strength.

    Kiefer found these items in the garbage while working as a janitor at a Customs and Border Protection station in Ajo, Arizona from 2003 through 2014. While obtaining permission to donate discarded food items to a local pantry, Kiefer noticed the deeply personal items he also found discarded each day: letters, clothing, toys, medications and toiletries. Moved by the untold stories these objects embody, Kiefer commemorates them in photographs akin to portraits, salvaging and preserving traces of human journeys cut short. 

    El Sueño Americano | The American Dream: Photographs by Tom Kiefer presents a selection of more than one hundred photographs from Kiefer’s ongoing project, along with newly recorded video interviews with the artist and with migrants who have themselves crossed the border. Additional interpretation will outline the history of restrictive immigration policies in the United States and connect visitors with organizations involved in legal and humanitarian aid and advocacy.

    Blending documentary and fine art photography, Kiefer’s images are a poignant testament to the hardships of migration and a call to return to human decency in how we treat each other.

    Los Amuletos Migran (The Amulets Migrate), 2019Listen to migrants’ rights advocate Dora Rodriguez’s story of crossing the US-Mexico border in 1980 and the context and meaning she gives to Tom Kiefer’s collection of items that were taken from migrants at the border.

    This post was originally published on Salvavision.

  • Photo: Honore-Daumier-Don-Quixote.jpg – Wikimedia Commons

     

    Not too long ago, I took my daughter Audrey to a Washington DC production by the Shakespeare Theatre Company of the play Man of La Mancha. It’s one of my favorite plays, and one that I first saw when I was her age. It is based on the famous novel by Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra, in which an elderly gentleman is deluded into thinking that he is a valiant knight – Don Quixote de la Mancha – who is sworn to uphold the strict moral code of chivalry in a cynical, brutal, violent world that is devoid of such ideals. Although long past the time of armored knights on horseback, he and his faithful squire set out across the plains of La Mancha and the mountains of the Sierra Morena on a madman’s quest, the virtuous and indefatigable champion of a better world.

    Madness?

    Perhaps, but for many of us Don Quixote is heroic, even if comically soft in the head. Does one need to be certifiably insane to yearn for a world in which decency, honor, love, and bravery speak to a man’s best character? Granted, chivalry is a problematic moral premise, given its machismo ethos, its disdain for the peasantry, and its relegation of women as chaste objects of beauty and purity. Still, considering what values prevailed four hundred years ago when Cervantes wrote this epic novel, chivalry was a monumental step ahead in moral evolution.

    My musings are not only literary.

    Given the full house at that play’s production, and the fact that this play and the novel itself have such continuing appeal to so many of us, it isn’t too much of a stretch to assert that many people yearn for a less cynical, more principled, more compassionate world…a world, for instance, in which the destruction of the planet’s environment for the sake of short term economic gain (by the few) would be recognized as the starkest madness. Our own children and grandchildren will pay a dreadful price for this morally indefensible position, and it is harrowing to even imagine what we are bequeathing to generations further into the future – if we have such a future at all. We know enough however to imagine such a dire future very clearly – yet still we as a nation respond tentatively, if at all. Madness.

    Moral principles are important to me. In my decades of work in less developed countries, I’ve been face-to-face with those who are beset by intense poverty – poverty so grinding and debilitating that it is very hard for Americans to imagine. Still, we have poverty here too, yet despite being an exceptionally wealthy country we watch powerlessly as the gap between rich and poor widens inexorably, while curiously so many poor citizens celebrate a new tax law that exacerbates this trend. Simultaneously, we cut back on foreign aid and humanitarian relief. Then we wonder why the rich get richer and the refugee numbers swell. Madness.

    Human rights are important. Human rights describe and set the “bare-bones” threshold conditions for how human beings ought to live, and what governments ought to do to make this happen. Demanding that human rights be taken seriously is to demand governance that is about public service, justice, duty, and empathy – and being morally responsive to the “oughts”. Instead, we see our government unapologetically abuse the most vulnerable people of all – young children – by ripping them from the loving care of their parents, to “discourage” asylum seekers who are desperate for a place of safety – America – where they believed their human rights would be respected. Instead, and acting in our name, we see our government demonstrate astounding callousness, a total lack of empathy, and a disdain for human rights as they use the intense suffering of vulnerable children and their bereft parents to make a political point. This is morally repugnant. This is madness.

    America’s president has walked away from our once-celebrated leadership in human rights, to petulantly demand that a vast and expensive border wall be constructed to keep out those persons whose asylum claims are morally sound, and whose hopes, dreams, and needs are very human. Were we instead to spend the wall money on strategically helping to solve the problems that drive people to seek asylum far from their homes, we might see positive changes and a steep decline in asylum seekers. Instead, Trump and his base insist on a wall for us all to hide behind, while the human beings on the other side of that wall unrelentingly suffer. “Not our problem!” Madness.

    Gender equality and fairness (equity) is important to me. While Don Quixote would have been ethically challenged to imagine such a thing, we now know better. We are reminded by the example of courageous feminists – women and men – that the principle of human dignity is for all human beings, regardless of gender (or race, or ethnicity, or age, or disability status, or gender identity, or sexual orientation, or…). Yet we have a President who has excused his boasts of sexual assaulting women as “locker room”, a Vice President who is hostile to women’s rights, and an Attorney General who has a long record of opposition to fundamental rights for women. In short, our political leadership undercuts any moral position that would recognize the worth and full humanity of the female half of the country, and of others who are marginalized. Still, more than 51% of white women voted for Trump in 2016. Madness, yet again.

    Yes, Don Quixote de la Mancha was almost certainly the victim of a form of insanity. Still, it was an insanity that epitomized humanity’s idealistic struggle for a better world, a world that “ought to be”. I’m more inclined to follow the example of Don Quixote, tilt at the windmills of greed, callousness, ignorance, fear, arrogance, lies, bigotry, hatred, and cynicism, than accept – much less politically celebrate – the feckless, morally bereft leadership that now prevails in our once proud country.

    Hopefully the Democrats can find better leadership than a modern version of Don Quixote. Leaders with a clear and transformative moral vision, leaders with a commitment to democracy and public service, leaders who are environmentally intelligent and wise, leaders who actually possess empathy and decency and integrity. Leaders who are sane.

    As the November mid-terms approach, as we confront the grim prospects of the nomination (by an illegitimate President) and the confirmation (by a morally spineless Senate majority) of yet another hard-right Supreme Court Justice, and the long-awaited revelations of Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation (as Trump heads off to have his summit with Putin), I have to believe that clinging to idealism isn’t madness.

    It’s the definition of sanity, and hope.

    This post was originally published on Blogs – Chloe Schwenke.

  • Beyond the planned border wall and limits on new refugees, the federal government wants tighter restrictions on immigration to this country. On this episode of Reveal, we examine efforts throughout the U.S. to deport migrants faster, detain them longer and prevent them from obtaining visas that might offer a path to legal residency.

    To explore more reporting, visit revealnews.org or find us at fb.com/ThisIsReveal, on Twitter @reveal or Instagram @revealnews.

    This post was originally published on Reveal.