Category: refugees

  • Parliament is having the second reading of the Labour Party government’s latest answer to the “hostile environment” for so-called ‘illegal’ migration, the Border Security, Asylum, and Immigration Bill. So, a migrant rights group has called on MPs to ditch the racist piece of legislation.

    Border Security, Asylum, and Immigration Bill: second reading begins

    On Monday 10 February, the House of Commons carried out the second reading of Home Office head Yvette Cooper’s Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill.

    It’s part of the Labour government’s plans for a supposed ‘crackdown’ on criminalised migration.

    The bill would give more powers to the UK’s Border Security Command. Notably, it would:

    • Criminalise immigration to the UK by targeting the people who facilitate the travel of undocumented people, particularly across the Channel
    • Extend already intrusive powers to seize people’s devices at the border including the ability to access, examine, copy and retain information on a person’s device related to (facilitating) criminalised travel
    •  Criminalise providing and possessing supplies and information that could conceivably be used to help someone travel without the required immigration documentation
    •  Introduce sanctions against people suspected of facilitating criminalised travel using Serious Crime Prevention Orders (SCPOs)
    • Expand immigration detention by removing the requirement for a deportation order against someone to be in place.

    Crucially, in particular, the bill targets people crossing the English Channel via small boats. The powers build on the recent Tory-introduced racist immigration bills, including the Nationality and Borders Act 2022 and the Illegal Migration Act 2023.

    The Nationality and Border Act 2022 introduced powers with parallels to counter-terror powers like Schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act 2000, but specifically applying to migrants crossing the Channel in small boats over the last three years. Now, Labour’s new “hostile environment” policies is set to ramp up the attack on migrant rights.

    Bill criminalising asylum seekers in a ‘crisis’ of Labour’s own making

    So, the Migrants’ Rights Network is urging MPs to vote against the bill. The group has sent a vital briefing to MPs ahead of the second reading. It details a litany of harms the bill poses to migrants seeking asylum in the UK.

    Significantly, they have called out the government’s flagship legislation as:

    yet another attempt to steadily cut off routes to migrate,
    including to claim asylum, which does not require legally sanctioned travel under the Refugee Convention.

    That is, under the Refugee Convention which the UK is party to, there’s nothing ‘illegal’ about people trying to reach the UK and make asylum claims. Instead, the issue is that the UK’s limited routes to asylum is pushing migrants into these treacherous, and often deadly crossings in the first place. As the briefing summed up:

    the Border Security Bill is yet another attempt of the
    Government to further criminalise people in relation to a ‘crisis’ that is manufactured by them.

    On top of this, the group lambasted the provisions in the bill that would see migrants detained for longer. It pointed out that this is:

    despite the UK already being the only country in Europe
    without a time limit on detention and the well-documented abuse, including racism, in immigration detention.

    Furthermore, its briefing made clear in no uncertain terms how:

    Expanding detention with the effect also of extending detention can amount to a breach of human rights.

    Given this, the Migrants’ Rights Network’s briefing recommends firstly that MPs reject the bill. However, it argues that this new parliament needs to go further to fix the harm of previous Tory government bills.

    Repeal racist policies that already exist

    Notably, the briefing calls on MPs to repeal existing legislation that has provided the foundation for the policies. It states that they should:

    1. Repeal the policy of seizing phones at the border
    2. End criminalisation of facilitating crossings

    It issued the first demand noting that:

    ● While the new Bill would extend powers to seize electronic devices including phones from migrants, including people seeking asylum, this policy is not unprecedented in UK law
    ● The Home Office operated a policy of seizing phones from migrants crossing the Channel between 2018 and 2020. Despite being ruled as unlawful in 2022, an amendment to the Illegal Migration Act 2023 implemented powers to seize and retain electronic devices, as well as the ability to access, copy and use information stored on them.
    ● We urge the Government to repeal existing powers to seize electronic devices as set out in the Illegal Migration Act 2023

    Meanwhile, it stated that it should end criminalisation of facilitating crossings because:

    ● It is government policy that forces people to become intermediaries, because “safe” routes do not exist for the majority of nationalities. Rather than address this, successive governments have stripped back routes to come to the UK while criminalising people who are forced into making dangerous Channel crossings.
    ● The Bill would extend powers to criminalise people who act as intermediaries to facilitate migration along ‘irregular’ routes. This builds on legislation in the Nationality and Borders Act 2022 which introduced the new offence of ‘illegal arrival’ and criminalised ‘assisting an unlawful immigration or asylum seeker”.
    ● It is Government legislation that forces people to turn to
    intermediaries, and then punishes them. This must end now.

    Border Security, Asylum, and Immigration Bill must be thrown out

    CEO of the Migrants’ Rights Network Fizza Qureshi said:

    The introduction of a counter-terror approach to migration, particularly in relation to refugees and people seeking asylum, is alarming.

    This Bill makes it clear that the Government intends to ignore its responsibility to provide protection while introducing a wide range of measures that will restrict civil liberties, penalise people for supporting undocumented migrants, and a vast expansion of counter-terror and surveillance powers in blanket seizures of phones. The Border Security Bill is explicitly designed to target and restrict the movement of racialised people and frame them as a national security threat.

    We call for this Bill to be thrown out and urge the Government to repeal existing powers that criminalise seeking protection in the UK.

    Featured image via the House of Commons

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • The Labour Party just ramped up its racist political theatre for the far-right with another disgusting anti-immigration stunt.

    As first reported in the Times, it seems that Keir Starmer is taking the fight right to Reform and Nigel Farage’s front door. Like some grim reality TV show, the government is planning to:

    publish a series of videos showing the “journey” of an illegal immigrant, from detention in early morning raids to transfer from bleak immigration removal centres to waiting planes and — subject to approval — footage aboard flights out of the country

    Politicians from the Green Party pointed out the similarities to Reform policies:

    It’s obvious this is Labour continuing its lurch to the right, all in a gross bid to win-over racist Reform voters.

    Labour seem to be having a bit of an identify crisis.

    Of course, in reality, this is the Labour right to a Tory ‘T’. They’ll be cracking out the Miliband “Controls on Immigration” mugs any day now. So no “change” there then:

    Jeremy Corbyn highlighted that its all about demonising migrants making dangerous journeys to reach the UK. Political scapegoating like this will put more lives at risk:

    Of course, the stunt will do nothing to stop people making these fatal journeys. To do that, the government needs to expand safe routes to asylum in the UK – something which doesn’t fit Labour’s narrative of being tough on immigration.

    Ultimately though, the point isn’t to save migrant lives. It’s to bolster Labour’s popularity with the racist voters it now sees as its base:

    What kind of dystopian shit is this? Oh wait, it’s the Labour right

    Labour’s Clive Lewis was quick to point out a potential new revenue stream. Seeing as though Labour are not usually afraid of making money from people suffering, it doesn’t even seem as far-fetched as his sarcasm intended:

    Vilifying migrants for ratings from racists like is some Hunger Games-like dystopian shit if ever there was some:


    Very ‘Tory DWP minister donning a stab vest and swaggering about in a dawn benefit raid‘ video. A poster on X pitched that maybe Labour could roll out a whole series:

    Pandering to far-right fascist shitheads

    Ultimately though, it won’t end well for Labour. Pandering to Reform will only fuel the rise of the far right. However, it’s going to end worst of all for asylum seekers – because that’s who its racist showboating will continue to harm.

    Because when it comes down to it, Labour is using the same, racist, “hostile environment” playbook that’s continued to devastate migrant lives. And when it inevitably does fail, Reform will be grinning gormlessly and spewing its fascist plans to finally put a stop to immigration – which also wouldn’t work obviously – but that won’t matter. Come the next election, Labour’s vote will collapse much like the Tories’ did.

    Instead of making a show out of migrants suffering, the government should treat migrants with the dignity and respect they deserve, and open up safe passage to them. Migrants lives should never be a political football – least of all to win-over the far-right fascist shitheads fawning over Farage’s racist vanity show-turned-political party. The return of the Labour right nasty party is sure giving it a run for its money on that front though.

    Feature image via 

    By HG

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • By Rachel Helyer Donaldson, RNZ News journalist

    A Palestinian man living in Aotearoa New Zealand who has lost 55 relatives in three Israeli airstrikes on Gaza, says his remaining family will never leave, despite a US proposal to remove them.

    US President Donald Trump doubled down on his plan on Friday after it was rejected by Palestinians and leaders around the world.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • Donald Trump’s outrageous plan to remove the Palestinian people from Gaza, assume U.S. ownership of the Gaza Strip and make it into the “Riviera of the Middle East” reveals his intent to commit a war crime and a crime against humanity. What Trump proposed during a February 4 news conference with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House is “unlawful…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • Guantánamo represents a place beyond the reach of morality and the law, where America’s most dangerous enemies can be thrown, never to be seen again.

    This post was originally published on Dissent Magazine.

  • A longtime immigration enforcement official has been tapped to run the agency responsible for managing unaccompanied migrant children, in a move that has alarmed experts and advocates who are concerned that information about children and their families will be shared for arrests and deportations. For the past two decades, an office within the Department of Health and Human Services has…

    Source

    This post was originally published on Latest – Truthout.

  • The Gaza ceasefire deal proves that Israeli politics can only survive if it’s engaged in perpetual war.

    COMMENTARY: By Abdelhalim Abdelrahman

    US President Donald Trump has unsettled Arab leaders with his obscene suggestion that Egypt and Jordan absorb Palestinians from Gaza.

    Both Egypt and Jordan have stated that this is a non-starter and will not happen.

    Israeli extremists have welcomed Trump’s comments with the hope that the forced expulsion of Palestinians would pave the way for Jewish settlements in Gaza.

    But the truth is that Israeli leaders likely feel deceived by Trump more than anything else. Benjamin Netanyahu and most of Israeli society were once clamouring for Donald Trump.

    All that has changed since President Trump sent his top Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff to Israel in which Witkoff reportedly lambasted Benjamin Netanyahu and forced him to accept a ceasefire agreement.

    Since then, Israeli leaders and Israeli society, are seemingly taken aback by Trump’s more restrained approach toward the Middle East and desire for a ceasefire.

    While the current ceasefire in place is a precarious endeavour at best, Israeli reactions to the cessation of hostilities highlight a profound point: not only did Netanyahu misread Trump’s intentions, but the entire Israeli political system itself seemingly only thrives during conflict in which the US provides it with unfettered military and diplomatic support.

    Geostrategic calculus
    Firstly, Israel believed that Trump’s second term would likely be a continuation of his first — where the US based its geostrategic calculus in the Middle East around Israel’s interests. This gave Israeli leaders the impression that Trump would give them the green light to attack Iran, resettle and starve Gaza, and formally annex the West Bank.

    However, Benjamin Netanyahu and his extremist ilk failed to take into consideration that Trump likely views blanket Israeli interests as liabilities to both the United States and Trump’s vision for the Middle East.

    Trump blessing an Israel-Iran showdown seems to be off the table. Trump himself stated this and is backing up his words by appointing Washington-based analyst Mike DiMino as a top Department of Defence advisor.

    DiMino, a former fellow at the non-interventionist think tank Defense Priorities, is against war with Iran and has been highly critical of US involvement in the Middle East. Steve Witkoff will also be leading negotiations with Iran.

    The appointment of DiMino and Witkoff has enraged the Washington neoconservative establishment and is a signal to Tel Aviv that Trump will not capitulate to Israel’s hawkish ambitions.

    The Trump effect
    As it pertains to his vision for the Middle East, Trump has been adamant about expanding the Abraham Accords, deepening US military ties with Saudi Arabia, and possibly pioneering Saudi-Israeli “normalisation”.

    The Saudi government has condemned Israel’s actions in Gaza, calling it a genocide and also made it clear that they will not normalise relations with Israel without the creation of a Palestinian state.

    While there is an explicit pro-Israel angle to all these components, none of Trump’s objectives for the Middle East would be feasible if the genocide in Gaza continued or if the US allowed Israel to formally annex the occupied West Bank, something Trump stopped during his first term.

    It is unlikely that a Palestinian state will arise under Trump’s administration; however, Trump has been in contact with Palestinian Authority (PA) President Mahmoud Abbas.

    Trump’s Middle East Adviser Massad Boulos has also facilitated talks between Abbas and Trump. Steve Witkoff has also met with PA official Hussein al-Sheikh in Saudi Arabia to discuss where the PA fits into a post-October 7 Gaza and a possible pathway to a Palestinian state.

    Witkoff’s willingness to meet with PA, along with the quiet yet growing relationship between Trump and Abbas, was likely something Netanyahu did not anticipate and may have also factored into Netanyahu’s acquiescence in Gaza.

    Of equal importance, the Gaza ceasefire deal proves that Israeli politics can only survive if it’s engaged in perpetual war.

    Brutal occupation
    This is evidenced by its brutal occupation of the Palestinians, destroying Gaza, and attacking its neighbours in Syria and Lebanon. Now that Israel is forced to stop its genocide in Gaza, at least for the time being, fissures within the Israeli government are already growing.

    Jewish extremist Itamar Ben Gvir resigned from Netanyahu’s coalition due to the ceasefire after serving as Israel’s national security minister. Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich also threatened to leave if a ceasefire was enacted.

    Such dynamics within the Israeli government and its necessity for conflict are only possible because the US allows it to happen.

    In providing Israel with unfettered military and diplomatic support, the US allows Israel to torment the Palestinian people. Now that Israel cannot punish Gaza, it has shifted their focus to the West Bank.

    Since the ceasefire’s implementation, the Israeli army has engaged in deadly raids in the Jenin refugee camp which had displaced over 2000 Palestinians. The Israeli army has also imposed a complete siege on the West Bank, shutting down checkpoints to severely restrict the movement of Palestinians.

    All of Israel’s genocidal practices are a direct result of the impunity granted to them by the Biden administration; who willingly refused to impose any consequences for Israel’s blatant violation of US law.

    Joe Biden could have enforced either the Leahy Law or Section 620 I of the Foreign Assistance Act at any time, which would ban weapons from flowing to Israel due to their impediment of humanitarian aid into Gaza and use of US weapons to facilitate grave human rights abuses in Gaza.

    Instead, he chose to undermine US laws to ensure that Israel had everything it facilitate their mass slaughter of Palestinians in Gaza.

    The United States has always held all the cards when it comes to Israel’s hawkish political composition. Israel was simply the executioner of the US’s devastating policies towards Gaza and the broader Palestinian national movement.

    Abdelhalim Abdelrahman is a freelance Palestinian journalist. His work has appeared in The New Arab, The Hill, MSN, and La Razon. Tis article was first published by The New Arab and is republished under Creative Commons.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • What will happen to Australia — and New Zealand — once the superpower that has been followed into endless battles, the United States, finally unravels?

    COMMENTARY: By Michelle Pini, managing editor of Independent Australia

    With President Donald Trump now into his second week in the White House, horrific fires have continued to rage across Los Angeles and the details of Elon Musk’s allegedly dodgy Twitter takeover began to emerge, the world sits anxiously by.

    The consequences of a second Trump term will reverberate globally, not only among Western nations. But given the deeply entrenched Americanisation of much of the Western world, this is about how it will navigate the after-shocks once the United States finally unravels — for unravel it surely will.

    Leading with chaos
    Now that the world’s biggest superpower and war machine has a deranged criminal at the helm — for a second time — none of us know the lengths to which Trump (and his puppet masters) will go as his fingers brush dangerously close to the nuclear codes. Will he be more emboldened?

    The signs are certainly there.

    Trump Mark II: Chaos personified
    President Donald Trump 2.0 . . . will his cruelty towards migrants and refugees escalate, matched only by his fuelling of racial division? Image: ABC News screenshot IA

    So far, Trump — who had already led the insurrection of a democratically elected government — has threatened to exit the nuclear arms pact with Russia, talked up a trade war with China and declared “all hell will break out” in the Middle East if Hamas hadn’t returned the Israeli hostages.

    Will his cruelty towards migrants and refugees escalate, matched only by his fuelling of racial division?

    This, too, appears to be already happening.

    Trump’s rants leading up to his inauguration last week had been a steady stream of crazed declarations, each one more unhinged than the last.

    He wants to buy Greenland. He wishes to overturn birthright citizenship in order to deport even more migrant children, such as  “pet-eating Haitians and “insane Hannibal Lecters” because America has been “invaded”.

    It will be interesting to see whether his planned evictions of Mexicans will include the firefighters Mexico sent to Los Angeles’ aid.

    At the same time, Trump wants to turn Canada into the 51st state, because, he said,

    “It would make a great state. And the people of Canada like it.”

    Will sexual predator Trump’s level of misogyny sink to even lower depths post Roe v Wade?

    Probably.

    Denial of catastrophic climate consequences
    And will Trump be in even further denial over the catastrophic consequences of climate change than during his last term? Even as Los Angeles grapples with a still climbing death toll of 25 lives lost, 12,000 homes, businesses and other structures destroyed and 16,425 hectares (about the size of Washington DC) wiped out so far in the latest climactic disaster?

    The fires are, of course, symptomatic of the many years of criminal negligence on global warming. But since Trump instead accused California officials of “prioritising environmental policies over public safety” while his buddy and head of government “efficiency”, Musk blamed black firefighters for the fires, it would appear so.

    Will the madman, for surely he is one, also gift even greater protections to oligarchs like Musk?

    Trump has already appointed billionaire buddies Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy to:

     “…pave the way for my Administration to dismantle government bureaucracy, slash excess regulations, cut wasteful expenditures and restructure Federal agencies”.

    So, this too is already happening.

    All of these actions will combine to create a scenario of destruction that will see the implosion of the US as we know it, though the details are yet to emerge.

    Flawed AUKUS pact sinking quickly
    The flawed AUKUS pact sinking quickly . . . Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese with outgoing President Joe Biden, will Australia have the mettle to be bigger than Trump. Image: Independent Australia

    What happens Down Under?
    US allies — like Australia — have already been thoroughly indoctrinated by American pop culture in order to complement the many army bases they house and the defence agreements they have signed.

    Though Trump hasn’t shown any interest in making it a 52nd state, Australia has been tucked up in bed with the United States since the Cold War. Our foreign policy has hinged on this alliance, which also significantly affects Australia’s trade and economy, not to mention our entire cultural identity, mired as it is in US-style fast food dependence and reality TV. Would you like Vegemite McShaker Fries with that?

    So what will happen to Australia once the superpower we have followed into endless battles finally breaks down?

    As Dr Martin Hirst wrote in November:

    ‘Trump has promised chaos and chaos is what he’ll deliver.’

    His rise to power will embolden the rabid Far-Right in the US but will this be mirrored here? And will Australia follow the US example and this year elect our very own (admittedly scaled down) version of Trump, personified by none other than the Trump-loving Peter Dutton?

    If any of his wild announcements are to be believed, between building walls and evicting even US nationals he doesn’t like, while simultaneously making Canadians US citizens, Trump will be extremely busy.

    There will be little time even to consider Australia, let alone come to our rescue should we ever need the might of the US war machine — no matter whether it is an Albanese or sycophantic Dutton leadership.

    It is a given, however, that we would be required to honour all defence agreements should our ally demand it.

    It would be great if, as psychologists urge us to do when children act up, our leaders could simply ignore and refuse to engage with him, but it remains to be seen whether Australia will have the mettle to be bigger than Trump.

    Republished from the Independent Australia with permission.

    This post was originally published on Asia Pacific Report.

  • RAF Akrotiri has been participating in Israel’s genocide in Gaza for over a year. But the Telegraph is one of many mainstream media outlets in the UK which have failed to report on that. Instead, the Telegraph thinks its big and clever to publish a “small boats tracker” focusing on the people who have been escaping war, poverty, and repression to seek a better life in the UK.

    Source

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • The threatened deportations from Thailand of a Vietnamese ethnic minority activist and 48 Uyghurs detained after trying to flee China have cast a harsh spotlight on Bangkok.

    But a flood of war refugees from Myanmar poses a bigger test for Thailand’s relatively generous policies toward migrants.

    The Uyghurs, held in Thailand since 2014 after attempting to use the Southeast Asian nation to escape persecution in China, have said they fear they are about to be repatriated and staged a hunger strike to highlight their plight.

    Vietnamese ethnic minority rights activist Y Quynh Bdap, who Hanoi wants to extradite and jail for terrorism, denies Vietnamese accusations that he committed 2023 attacks on government offices that resulted in nine deaths.

    A Thai Immigration Bureau spokesperson said Thailand has “no policy” to deport the Uyghurs, while enforcement of a Bangkok court ruling calling for Bdap’s extradition to Vietnam is still pending.

    These high-profile rights cases are playing out amid a bigger crackdown on hundreds of thousands of Myanmar citizens who have taken refuge in Thailand since a military takeover four years ago.

    The displaced Myanmar citizens include junta opponents, but are largely ordinary people who seek safety and work as the civil war at home grinds into its fifth year, say those who help migrants in Thailand.

    Many have been subject to arrest, involuntary repatriation and arrest again back in Myanmar as Thailand moves to regulate labor migration flows with stricter registration policies and stringent inspections.

    “While all nationalities face similar risks, Myanmar nationals face dual risks – both political opposition groups and ordinary workers uninvolved in politics. If deported, they might be drafted into military service, risking their lives,” said Roisai Wongsuban, policy advocacy advisor for the Migrant Working Group, an NGO in Thailand.

    Mecca for migrants

    Along with scrutiny from rights and labor groups, Thailand gets plenty of credit from the United Nations and others for hosting more than 5 million non-Thai nationals.

    “Because of its relatively prosperous and stable economy, Thailand has attracted millions of migrants from neighboring countries looking for a better standard of living,” said the International Organization for Migration, or IOM.

    However, Thailand is not a signatory to the 1951 UN Refugee Convention, meaning it doesn’t recognize refugees, and those who seek asylum can face detention and deportation.

    But it is a main base of humanitarian U.N. agencies and NGOs that help refugees in the region.

    “The country has also traditionally hosted hundreds of thousands of nationals from neighboring countries, who have fled their homelands due to war, internal conflict or national instability,” the IOM, a UN agency, said in a statement.

    “Khaing,” a former teacher with the Civil Disobedience Movement folds clothes at her current home in Bangkok, Thailand, June 4, 2024, after fleeing Myanmar to avoid conscription by the military junta.
    (Lillian Suwanrumpha/AFP)

    Thai law has since 2016 recognized the principle of non-refoulement, or not deporting people to places where they face torture and other abuse.

    But in practice, politically sensitive cases involving neighboring authoritarian states are handled differently, and Bangkok has cooperated with the rendition of Vietnamese, Lao and Cambodian dissidents by those nations’ security agents.

    A middle-income country with more than a fifth of its 67 million people over 60 and a low birth rate, fast-aging Thailand needs the workers.

    “We must maintain a balance between providing employment for Thai nationals and managing migrant workers to meet business needs, enabling efficient operations across the manufacturing, agricultural and industrial sectors,” Thai Labor Minister Phiphat Ratchakitprakarn told reporters in Bangkok last month.

    Thailand’s neighbors need the jobs and money.

    Cambodia, Laos and Myanmar –- poorer states that border Thailand and have endured war, political violence and economic stagnation -– provide the “vast majority of Thailand’s migrant stock,” the IOM noted.

    Laos said it took in more than US$600 million in remittances in 2023 from 400,000 migrant workers, mostly in Thailand.

    Vietnamese ethnic minority rights activist Y Quynh Bdap in an undated photo.
    Vietnamese ethnic minority rights activist Y Quynh Bdap in an undated photo.
    (Y Quynh Bdap via Facebook)

    An IOM report last month estimated that 5.3 million non-Thai nationals were living in Thailand as of December 2023, up from 4.9 million five years earlier.

    The Thai Ministry of Labor says that more than 3 million Myanmar nationals were legally living in Thailand as of March 2024, while 286,000 Lao workers were legally working there as of last November.

    The tally of registered Cambodians was 460,000 as of January 2024. Cambodia’s labor ministry published a figure of 1.2 million last year.

    The IOM says that more than a third of the 5.2 million migrants estimated to be in Thailand as of July 2024 are in “irregular” situations, without proper documents and not captured in ministry statistics.

    Such migrants suffer abuses such as unpaid wages, excessive working hours, and unsafe working conditions – or get trafficked to work scam centers in compounds neighboring states’ borders with Thailand, advocates say.

    Conscription law exodus

    What makes a Thai crackdown on illegal migrants dangerous for Myanmar ‘s war-displaced citizens are policies the Myanmar junta and the Thai government adopted in 2024, migrant advocates say.

    After a military offensive launched across northern Myanmar by ethnic armies in late 2023 started to turn the tide against the junta, the regime last February passed a law imposing mass conscription.

    Fear of getting drafted by the unpopular junta drove so many young men to flee to Thailand in 2024 that they set a record for the highest annual number of undocumented Myanmar migrants to arrive in Thailand.

    This sparked anti-migrant protests in several Thai cities and waves of mass arrests for illegal cross-border entry.

    Migrant labor advocates who tracked a 120-day Thai government crackdown on illegal workers from June to September said the drive led to the arrest of 300,000 people, including about 210,000 Myanmar nationals.

    “When illegal immigrants entered Myanmar due to the conscription law, hundreds of thousands were arrested,” said Min Oo, a labor official at the Thailand-based Federation of Education and Development.

    People from Myanmar cross the Moei river on the Thai-Myanmar border on April 11, 2023.
    People from Myanmar cross the Moei river on the Thai-Myanmar border on April 11, 2023.
    (Royal Thai Army /AFP)

    As a result of repatriations of migrants from prisons in Ranong, a Thai border town near the southern tip of Myanmar, about 800 people were handed over to the junta for conscription last year, said Thar Kyaw, head of the Meikta Thahaya Self Administrated Funeral Welfare Association.

    According to Ranong locals, young men under the age of 35 were sent to three different Myanmar military units in the next-door Tanintharyi region. Disabled people were also arrested and their families had to pay ransoms to free them.

    “Deporting Myanmar nationals is a violation of human rights and effectively a handover to the oppressors of the Myanmar people,” Thar Kyaw told RFA.

    Tightening Thai policies

    The surge in migrants from Myanmar prompted other Thai measures, including limits on daily entry visa applications at its embassies, elimination of visa renewal options and university places for students, and inspections and closures of migrant schools in southern Thailand.

    “Although we pay taxes to Thailand in accordance with their laws, we still feel a sense of inferiority,” said Aung Kyaw, a Burmese student in Chiang Mai, the biggest city in northern Thailand. “And we constantly live on the brink of becoming illegal residents.”

    RELATED STORIES

    Thailand lets autocratic neighbors hunt down opponents on its soil

    Thais scrutinized over Cambodian’s murder, Vietnamese, Uyghur detainees

    Conscription escapees tell of forced junta recruitment, inadequate training

    Thailand should end Myanmar junta’s control over migrants: NUG

    Wongsuban of the Migrant Working Group said Thailand wants short-term workers but doesn’t want Myanmar war refugees to stay permanently – “which is why they don’t make it easy to apply for refugee status or get residence permits.”

    Thailand is fine-tuning the “MOU system” it uses to manage the employment of migrant workers through bilateral Memoranda of Understanding with Myanmar, Cambodia, Laos and others.

    “Managing migrant workers in Thailand must consider employment opportunities for Thai citizens, national security and prevention of labor trafficking or forced labor,” said Ratchakitprakarn, the labor minister.

    The minister called on businesses employing migrant workers whose work permits are set to expire in mid-February to submit renewal applications or face “strict legal action against illegal migrant workers, as well as migrant workers and employers and businesses.”

    Migrant workers and activists from Laos and Myanmar told RFA the high cost – often many months’ pay – and long wait for work permits under the MOU system drives workers to try illegal entry and work in Thailand. Illegal workers keep trafficking profitable, they add.

    Myanmar nationals cross over into Thailand at the Tak border checkpoint in Thailand's Mae Sot district on April 10, 2024.
    Myanmar nationals cross over into Thailand at the Tak border checkpoint in Thailand’s Mae Sot district on April 10, 2024.
    (Manan Vatsyayana/AFP)

    Phyo Ko Ko, who works legally at a garment factory in Thailand, told RFA Burmese the military junta back in Myanmar is now collecting taxes on registered migrant workers’ earnings, in another hit to her income.

    “Workers only get a basic salary, so the money is spent on these visas and documents all year round,” said Phyo Ko Ko.

    Thai media have reported on some promising developments for migrants, such as cabinet approval in October of a plan to grant citizenship to nearly half a million people, including long-term migrants and children born in Thailand, and new visas for digital, medical and cultural pursuits.

    Despite the protests and crackdown of 2024, Wongsuban says the same economic priorities and necessities behind Thailand’s decision to accept migrant workers during the COVID-19 pandemic will ensure the flow of workers continues.

    Even critics and activists work with the understanding that “Thailand is the only country in the region that accepts a high number of migrant workers, war refugees, asylum seekers and immigrants,” he said.

    Reported by Nontarat Phaicharoen and Jon Preechawong for BenarNews, an RFA-affiliated online news service, RFA Burmese and Phouvong for RFA Lao. Translated by Aung Naing and Phouvong. Written by Paul Eckert.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Paul Eckert.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Detainees fear their return could be imminent despite UN experts urging Bangkok to halt possible transfer

    Relatives of Uyghurs detained in Thailand for more than a decade have begged the Thai authorities not to deport the 48 men back to China, after the detainees suggested their return appeared imminent.

    A UN panel of experts this week urged Thailand to “immediately halt the possible transfer”, saying the men were at “real risk of torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment if they are returned”.

    Continue reading…

    This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.

  • Allegations of rape, beatings and collusion by EU-funded security forces prompt shift in migration arrangements

    The European Commission is fundamentally overhauling how it makes payments to Tunisia after a Guardian investigation exposed myriad abuses by EU-funded security forces, including widespread sexual violence against migrants.

    Officials are drawing up “concrete” conditions to ensure that future European payments to Tunis can go ahead only if human rights have not been violated.

    Continue reading…

    This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.

  • A senior coroner in Kent has found that three men who were killed trying to cross the Channel were unlawfully killed. Mohamed Lamine Toure, Moussa Kouyae, and a third unnamed person were killed when a rubber dinghy holding 39 people “literally fell apart at the seams.”

    The Guardian reported that:

    The survivors were brought to shore in Dover after a UK fishing boat crew came across the sinking dinghy and rescued them, with help from the RNLI, air ambulance and UK Border Force.

    The Guardian also reported that investigating police officer, DI Ross Gurden, said that each of the people on the dinghy were there:

    of their own free will.

    A disgrace in the Channel – and after

    The officer’s comments are a disgrace. Before even examining any further facts of the case, we know that a number of desperate people got into a dilapidated dinghy in an attempt to cross the Channel. Why would someone do that? What must they be running from that is worse than risking an awful death at sea?

    Gurden’s comments went unremarked in the Guardian report, a banal comment on the horror of sea crossings. They show a lack of empathy, but it’s a lack of empathy writ large across borders.

    Ibrahima Bah, who piloted the boat, was sentenced to just under ten years detention “for manslaughter and facilitating illegal entry to the UK.” A fourth person, Hejratullah Ahmadi, also died but he was not included in the coroner’s inquest because he was part of the criminal trial of Bah. However, the Independent did note that:

    Bah was also a migrant but he piloted the boat in lieu of payment to the people smugglers.

    There must be some consideration of how and why Ibrahima had to be on that boat. Last month, a Free Ibrahima campaign statement read:

    We are devastated at the Court of Appeal outcome which leaves Ibrahima imprisoned as a scapegoat for border policies which continue to cause people to die in the Channel. We will keep fighting for Ibrahima and others as they are criminalised for seeking safety and a better life in the UK.

    The criminalisation of Ibrahima is typical of a broken and rotting system that punishes people trying to survive, and ignores the criminals in governments and border forces who view people dying in the sea as disposable non-humans.

    A broken and rotting migrant system

    Gurden’s remark that the people on the boat chose to be there call to mind poet Warsan Shire’s poem Home, and particularly the concluding stanza:

    no one leaves home until home is a sweaty voice in your ear

    saying-

    leave,

    run away from me now

    i don’t know what i’ve become

    but i know that anywhere

    is safer than here

    Imagine, how hard you would have to run to risk drowning in a freezing cold body of water, knowing that if you somehow survive the plastic boat you’re crammed into with other desperate people, you’ll face border patrol, police officers, and a government who’ll make you pay through the nose for daring to survive on its shores. Imagine that, whether you live or die, you know that the people you encounter along your last ditch journey will claim you had a ‘choice.’

    Is something really a choice if there is no other option?

    If you stay, you’ll die.

    If you go, you’ll die.

    If you die, your memory will be left with the cold words of an officer who insists that you made a ‘choice’ with your “free will.”

    And, the media that reports on your death, if you are even to be named, won’t bother to correct that officer’s callousness, because there are so many of you that have found a grave in the sea.

    Featured image via YouTube screenshot/ITV News

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • A bishop pleaded with newly-inaugurated US president-come-petulant child Donald Trump to “have mercy.” Bishop Mariann Edgar Budde of the Episcopal Diocese of Washington addressed Trump, his family, and the new vice-president, J.D. Vance:

    The culture of contempt that has become normalised in this country threatens to destroy us.

    Bishop Mariann Edgar Budde: on point

    She continued:

    Let me make one final plea, Mr. President. Millions have put their trust in you. And as you told the nation yesterday, you have felt the providential hand of a loving God. In the name of our God, I ask you to have mercy upon the people in our country who are scared now. There are gay, lesbian, and transgender children in Democratic, Republican, and independent families, some who fear for their lives.

    Trump remained stony-faced, occasionally smirking and muttering to his wife. Nevertheless, the bishop pleaded with Trump as a person of faith:

    The people who pick our crops, and clean our office buildings, labour in poultry farms and meatpacking plants, who was the dishes after we eat in restaurants, and work the night shifts in hospitals, they may not be citizens, or have the proper documentation, but the vast majority of immigrants are not criminals. They pay taxes and are good neighbours. They are faithful members of our churches and mosques, synagogues, gurdwaras, and temples. I ask you to have mercy Mr. President on those in our communities whose children fear that their parents will be taken away, and that you help those who are fleeing warzones and persecution in their own land to find compassion and welcome here.

    Bishop Mariann Edgar Budde poignantly concluded:

    Our God teaches us that we ought to be merciful to the stranger, for we were all once strangers in this land.

    Trump’s Meltdown

    How did Trump respond to this eloquent and impassioned plea that asked for humanity and humility for the most marginalised people in America? Of course, he had a child-like meltdown and went on a rant. He posted on his own social media platform, Truth Social, that:

    She brought her church into the World of politics in a very ungracious way. She was nasty in tone, and not compelling or smart.

    Apart from her inappropriate statements, the service was a very boring and uninspiring one.

    Clearly, Budde’s pleas for honesty and humility didn’t move Trump who remained as belligerent as ever. Trump referred to Budde as a “Radical Left hard line Trump hater,” exactly the type of behaviour Budde referred to with her commentary on a “culture of contempt” in America.

    Mike Collins, a Republican congressman, even called for Bishop Mariann Edgar Budde to be deported:

    Budde grew up in New Jersey and Colorado – not that the likes of Collins and Trump would let being an American citizen stand in the way of trying to deport someone.

    A senior fellow from the American Immigration Council expressed shock at Collins’ tweet:

    Flurry of executive orders

    Bishop Mariann Edgar Budde’s concerns were well-founded. Trump has signed a flurry of executive orders, including an insistence that federal government refer to only two sexes:

    As of today, it will henceforth be the official policy of the United States government that there are only two genders, male and female.

    The order itself reads:

    It is the policy of the United States to recognize two sexes, male and female. These sexes are not changeable and are grounded in fundamental and incontrovertible reality.

    This particular executive order is a targeting of trans people, and denies the lived reality of many Americans. It will have far-ranging consequences for trans people’s use of passports, identity cards, healthcare, work opportunities, and more. As the Guardian reported:

     The executive order also prevents the use of taxpayer funds for gender-affirming healthcare, and mandates that prisons are designated by sex assigned at birth, not gender identity – which means trans women could be housed in male prisons.

    Executive Director of GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders (GLAD Law) Ricardo Martinez said:

    Today’s promised executive order is a direct attack on transgender Americans, deliberately making it harder for people to live their everyday lives. It is cruel, and it is wrong.

    The administration is trying to create fear and sow chaos by its statements and orders, but no executive action can change the fundamental truth that transgender people are vital members of our families and communities.

    Trump’s government can expect to face robust opposition and protest from trans activists, charities, and queer allies.

    Birthright citizenship

    Another of the executive orders Trump has already signed seeks:

    to end birthright citizenship for children born in the US to immigrant parents who are in the country illegally, as well as those born to parents who are in the country on a temporary basis.

    There have been reports that the administration will enforce the order by withholding documents, such as passports, from people it deems ineligible for citizenship.

    Birthright citizenship is enshrined in the US constitution, which means Trump will find it very difficult to force this change through. Constitutional law expert Saikrishna Prakash said:

    This is not something he can decide on his own.

    Nevertheless, Trump has promised mass deportations.

    Just as Trump’s first term began with the shock and awe tactics of a series of outrageous and quickly signed executive orders, his second term is off to the same start.

    Trump has repeatedly shown that he doesn’t care about legal barriers, moral pleas, or even public pressure. He jumps to call anyone who doesn’t shower him with praise a “hater” and has no concept of humility.

    The next four years will require more people like Bishop Mariann Edgar Budde to look Trump in the eyes and call him out. Then, we must realise that appealing to his good sense or humanity simply will not work; he won’t care. We must learn our lessons from his first term and organise in our communities to fight back against his regressive policies.

    Featured image via YouTube screenshot/CNN

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Arrest of Osama Najim puts spotlight on pact with Italy amid claims he used detained migrants in ‘a form of slavery’

    A Libyan general wanted for alleged war crimes and violence against inmates at a prison near Tripoli has been arrested in the northern Italian city of Turin.

    Osama Najim, also known as Almasri, was detained on Sunday on an international arrest warrant after a tipoff from Interpol, a source at the prosecutors office for the Piedmont region confirmed.

    Continue reading…

    This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.

  • Figures reveal number of beneficiaries of temporary three-year visa since it was introduced by Labor in October

    Almost 1,000 Palestinian and Israeli nationals have been offered temporary humanitarian visas in Australia since last October, new data shows, as the six-week ceasefire between Israel and Hamas in Gaza begins.

    The humanitarian pathway for those affected by the conflict was introduced in October 2024 for the more than 1,300 Palestinians in Australia on visitor visas but prevents them from applying for permanent protection.

    Sign up for Guardian Australia’s breaking news email

    Continue reading…

    This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.

  • Home Office official says data protection laws caused the cost of its forced removal programme to increase

    The Conservative government spent more than £130m on IT and data systems for the scheme to send asylum seekers to Rwanda, which will never be used, the Observer can reveal.

    Digital tools needed to put the forced removal programme into effect made up the second-largest chunk of the £715m spent in little over two years, behind only the £290m handed directly to Paul Kagame’s government.

    Continue reading…

    This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.


  • This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Radio Free Asia.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Radio Free Asia.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Radio Free Asia.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • More than half a million TikTok users have piled onto the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu, known in English as RedNote, days ahead of a looming ban on the app in the United States, according to data from app stores and social media videos.

    Styling themselves “TikTok refugees,” many young Americans, seeking an alternative to TikTok, are flocking to join RedNote’s 300 million existing users — who are mostly in China — taking what they see as refuge from the ban, which could be enforced on Jan. 19.

    On Wednesday, Xiaohongshu, which literally means “Little Red Book” — a reference to the famous book of quotes from Mao Zedong, the founder of communist China — topped the list of most popular free downloads on the Apple Store and the Google Play store for Android users in the United States.

    RedNote allows users to share videos, photos and text posts, along with various shopping features. Known as China’s version of Instagram, it is particularly popular for sharing travel, makeup and fashion tips.

    It is owned by Shanghai-based Xingyin Information Technology.

    People walk past advertising for Chinese social networking and e-commerce app Xiaohongshu, also known as RedNote, at a shopping centre in Beijing, Jan. 15, 2025.
    People walk past advertising for Chinese social networking and e-commerce app Xiaohongshu, also known as RedNote, at a shopping centre in Beijing, Jan. 15, 2025.
    (Adek Berry/AFP)

    More than 700,000 new users joined the app, a person close to the company told Reuters, although the company didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

    Estimates from app data research firm Sensor Tower showed that U.S. downloads of RedNote up by more than 200% year-on-year this week and 194% higher than the previous week, Reuters reported.

    The apparent exodus comes ahead of a Jan. 19 deadline for the banning of TikTok in the United States under a bipartisan bill, should its Chinese parent ByteDance not have sold it by that time.

    In April, U.S. President Joe Biden signed the bill amid concerns that China’s government was using TikTok both to collect sensitive data about Americans and feed them propaganda.

    Lawyers for Chinese-owned TikTok asked the Supreme Court on Jan. 10 to postpone implementation of the ban, which takes effect the day before President-elect Donald Trump takes office.

    Navigating in Chinese

    Since RedNote uses Mandarin Chinese, new users were using translation tools to navigate the site. Some were confused; others were gleeful.

    “I have no idea what I’m doing here,” commented Elle Belle from the United States under the video that cited a desire to avoid platforms run by Zuckerman. “I can’t even read the RULES.”

    “I’m literally emotional right now bc we are so freaking awesome,” wrote @Unty Tan.

    Women search on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu, in Hong Kong, China, April 30, 2024.
    Women search on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu, in Hong Kong, China, April 30, 2024.
    (Tyrone Siu/Reuters)

    Some hoped to relocate entire communities that existed on TikTok, while others said the move is a form of protest, or a way to avoid using platforms owned by Meta.

    “I would rather stare at a language I can’t understand than to ever use a social media [platform] that Mark Zuckerberg owns,” says one former TikToker in a video posted to the platform on Jan. 13, referring to the Facebook CEO.

    The aversion to Meta was apparently linked to reports that the company had paid online activists to boost messages calling TikTok a threat to American children.

    ‘Give me all your datas’

    But the surge of new RedNote users from the United States prompted a series of jokes and memes by long-term Chinese Xiaohongshu users, riffing on fears of spying and data collection.

    “Welcome to spy station, give me all your datas,” quipped user @BubbleTea from Guangdong on Jan. 14, in a comment reposted to social media app Bluesky, accompanied by a cat photo. “American datas!” replied another user, also with a cat photo.

    RELATED STORIES

    Xiaohongshu: Innocent lifestyle app or another security risk?

    EXPLAINED: How the Chinese Communist Party manages public opinion

    TikTok lawyers ask Supreme Court to delay ban

    Chinese censors shut down key LGBTQ+ social media accounts

    Chinese controls ‘more efficient’ as country marks 30 years online

    Meanwhile, Xiaohongshu user BigTooth donned a cowboy hat to address new arrivals in a broad Texas accent, teaching them how to comment on Chinese posts.

    “You came over to this app, wanting to learn some Chinese, but you ain’t even got a Chinese keyboard on your phone,” he says. “But it’s OK. Don’t worry about that.”

    “I’m gonna teach you three Chinese expressions, and you can even type them out with your English keyboard,” he adds, suggesting “6,” “66” or “666” to indicate approval, XSWL, “Dying laughing,” and NB, a somewhat rude expression that nonetheless means something is admirable.

    American users started putting the tips into practice in comments.

    “66 (am I doing it right?),” commented U.S.-based RedNote user @KotaGibbs, gaining more than 1,000 likes. “You’re missing one 6, should be 666,” answered user @Cold from Canada.

    Comparing notes

    Many users compared notes about each other’s countries, according to screenshots of conversations posted to Bluesky on Jan. 15.

    “Can you guys tell us what’s wrong with our country, looking at it from your perspective outside of America?” asks one user.

    “Just wondering if it is true that Americans need to have 2-3 jobs to survive?” @momo_yu wanted to know.

    “yes, the economy is not great so people work multiple jobs just to live,” user @ally replied from the United States.

    “People have guns and shoot children for no reason,” answered @thisisjiaming from Beijing. “Sadly this is true,” commented @kimkimchii from the United States.

    “You people still believe election can improve your life,” wrote @Vivianfunny from Hong Kong, where only “patriots” approved by Beijing are allowed to run in elections.

    A smartphone displays the Chinese social networking and e-commerce app Xiaohongshu, also known as RedNote, in Beijing on January 15, 2025.
    A smartphone displays the Chinese social networking and e-commerce app Xiaohongshu, also known as RedNote, in Beijing on January 15, 2025.
    (Adek Berry/Reuters)

    Some American users embraced the new experience.

    “I’m having a lot of fun over there, we share a sense of humor and beefs with our governments,” Bluesky user ‪DarbyMae Shaw‬ ‪commented on Jan. 15.

    But others weren’t too sure.

    😂😂 less funny is that it censors posts from people of color and the lgbt community,” user @kluggin responded, in a reference to the ruling Chinese Communist Party’s far-reaching social media censorship.

    Can you add a translation feature?

    According to a Jan. 13 article on the website Advocate.com, one “TikTok refugee” reported being banned for posting content about transgender people.

    While some memes and videos crossed the language barrier by using subtitles, other users were crying out for automatic translation, according to a comment on the Apple Store.

    “Please please please!!! I love this app so so so much but I only speak english,” said a review by Sour_emy. “A lot of people in the us are moving to this app … so I was hoping there could be a translation feature added for things like comments and descriptions!!”

    “It would bring a lot of new people coming from tiktok,” the review said.

    Users seemed relatively unworried by the security concerns that also surround Xiaohongshu.

    The government of democratic Taiwan banned its officials from using Xiaohongshu, Douyin and TikTok amid concerns that the Chinese-owned platforms could compromise the island’s security.

    Meanwhile, a Chinese journalist now living in the United States who declined to be named for fear of reprisals said the exodus seemed ironic to him.

    “It’s hilarious that they’re escaping from an American prison run by the Chinese to a Chinese prison that’s also run by the Chinese,” the journalist said.

    Additional reporting by Wang Yun for RFA Mandarin. Edited by Malcolm Foster.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Luisetta Mudie.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Largest known deportation of people back to Niger to date comes as EU is accused of outsourcing cruelty to reduce Mediterranean crossings

    More than 600 people have been forcibly deported from Libya on a “dangerous and traumatising” journey across the Sahara, in what is thought to be one of the largest expulsions from the north African country to date.

    The International Organisation for Migration (IOM) confirmed 613 people, all Nigerien nationals, arrived in the desert town of Dirkou in Niger last weekend in a convoy of trucks. They were among a large number of migrant workers rounded up by the authorities in Libya over the past month.

    Continue reading…

    This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.

  • United Nations human rights committee says decision should serve as warning to other nations considering outsourcing asylum processing

    Australia violated the rights of asylum seekers arbitrarily detained on the island of Nauru, a UN watchdog has ruled, in a warning to other countries intent on outsourcing asylum processing.

    The UN human rights committee published decisions in two cases involving 25 refugees and asylum seekers who endured years of arbitrary detention in the island nation.

    Sign up for Guardian Australia’s breaking news email

    Continue reading…

    This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.

  • In 2015, hundreds of thousands of people fleeing war and repression were trying to reach safe havens in Europe. From his home in Norway, Tommy Olsen decided to travel to Greece, a major gateway for migrants and refugees. He joined hundreds of volunteers  helping the new arrivals and later created an NGO, the Aegean Boat Report, which monitors the plight of asylum seekers in Europe.


    Today, Olsen is a wanted man in Greece, caught up in a crackdown on refugees and people trying to defend their right to asylum.


    “I didn’t know what I walked into,” Olsen says.


    Mary Lawlor, the UN special rapporteur on human rights defenders, has condemned Greece’s harsh migration policies and the way its government is targeting activists like Olsen. But she says Europe as a whole is also to blame.


    “The whole notion of migration is a dirty word now,” she says. “The whole notion of refugees is a dirty word now.”


    This week on Reveal, reporters Dinah Rothenberg and Viola Funk from the Berlin podcast studio ACB Stories take us to Greece, where refugees and human rights defenders face legal and sometimes physical attacks from authorities trying to seal the country’s borders.

    This post was originally published on Reveal.

  • Figure includes hundreds of children, who make up one in five migrants trying to reach Europe fleeing war and poverty

    More than 2,200 people either died or went missing in the Mediterranean while trying to reach Europe in search of refuge in 2024.

    The figure, cited in a statement from Regina De Dominicis, the regional director for Europe and central Asia for the UN’s children’s agency, Unicef, was eclipsed on New Year’s Eve when 20 people fell into the sea and were reported missing after a boat started to take in water in rough seas about 20 miles off the coast of Libya.

    Continue reading…

    This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.

  • The result are in: the University of Bedfordshire tops the rankings of 149 UK universities by sustainability and ethical criteria – meaning if you’re looking for somewhere for higher education that actually cares, then it could be the place for you. 

    The University League – who’s the most ethical?

    The 2024/25 People & Planet University League ranks 149 UK universities against 14 criteria linked to climate and social justice. Universities receive award classes that follow the typical grading system in UK higher education, from 1st, 2:1, 2:2, 3rd and Fail.

    Post-1992 universities, given university status after the 1992 Further and Higher Education Act, continue to lead the way in sustainability in higher education with seven in the top 10 places. These institutions have often been early adopters of actions like ending recruitment links with fossil fuel companies and divesting from the border industry.

    Small and specialist universities have also proven that sustainability can be fostered at all institutions, with The Royal College of Art rising from a 3rd to a 2:1 after making a commitment to end all recruitment links and investments in the fossil fuel industry. Similarly, Arts University Bournemouth has finished with a first for the first time.

    The University of Bedfordshire has come out as the overall winner, following consistently high performance that has seen them finish in the top three for the last three years. The university has taken bold steps to divest endowment funds from the fossil fuel industry and to end recruitment pipelines with oil, gas and mining companies. They also scored highly for their energy sources and carbon reduction after investing in renewable energy generated on campus over the last 10 years.

    Russell Group: failing

    Just four Russell Group universities scored a 1st class award this year, down from six the previous year. The University of Oxford has slipped 27 places and keeps a 2:1, while the University of Cambridge has dropped 38 places to a third.

    Welsh institutions have taken a bold stand against the fossil fuel industry, with all eight universities there now committed to divested their endowments funds from that sector, and three have also ended recruitment links with companies involved in the oil, gas and mining industries.

    This has translated into a strong performance in the ranking with four of them scoring firsts, and the other four scoring 2:1s. For example, Aberystwyth has leaped 88 places from a 3rd to a 2:1, following its recent commitment to end recruitment ties with the fossil fuel, mining, and tobacco industries, which it adds to its commitment to divest from fossil fuels.

    As the vast majority of the university sector has now committed to divesting from fossil fuel companies, 10 universities have also decided to end their links via recruitment to environmentally destructive industries, up 30% since last year.

    In a bold step to delegitimise the border industry, six universities have also divested from companies that engage in the detention, deportation, use of force and surveillance of migrants.

    The winners, the University of Bedfordshire, and third placed University of West London have both invested in retrofitting and decarbonising their campuses recently, which have translated into high scores for carbon reduction and energy sources.

    For the first time this year, universities have been assessed on whether they have a fully plant-based or vegetarian outlet on campus, and it was found just 15% of institutions do.

    As universities seek to address their indirect emissions such as flying, it was also found that just 13% of universities have a plan to reduce aviation that prohibits mainland UK flights.

    Just 49% of universities are Living Wage Accredited, and 52% of universities have more than a quarter of their academic staff on fixed-term contracts, showing the extent of low-pay and precarity in the sector.

    Still far more to do to be an ethical university

    Laura Clayson, Campaigns Manager Climate Justice:

    Only 55% of UK universities have exclusions for fossil fuel extractor companies in their ethical investment policies, despite 78% having made public commitments to go Fossil Free. For over a decade students and staff have campaigned relentlessly to secure Fossil Free as an act of solidarity with the frontline and Indigenous communities resisting the impacts of fossil fuel operations and the climate crisis. We look forward to the sector aligning their policies with their proclamations in recognition of these demands for justice.

    Josie Mizen, Co-Director Climate Justice:

    As the climate crisis escalates, more and more universities are realising that climate justice can only be achieved by cutting ties with the fossil fuel industry. We’re delighted to see universities who’ve taken this vital step leading the way in this year’s University League.  There’s still much more work to do: we need more universities to commit to ending their relationships with oil, gas, and mining companies – but with a growing student movement standing up against these corporations infiltrating their campuses, we know it can be done.

    Andre Dallas, Co-Director Migrant Justice:

    Over the past year particularly, students across the UK have been unequivocal in their stance that they won’t allow their universities to continue to invest in blatant injustices like the hostile environment and climate collapse. Institutions like the University of South Wales are leading the way by showing that there is still a place for prioritising people and planet over profit – we look forward to the rest of the sector catching up before it’s too late.

    Jack Ruane, University League Manager:

    88% of students think their place of study should actively incorporate and promote sustainable development, so universities need to meet this demand if they want to attract this generation of young people. In this way, investments in sustainability are crucial for the long-term health of universities.

    Featured image supplied

    By The Canary


  • This content originally appeared on The Real News Network and was authored by The Real News Network.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Mazen al-Hamada had escaped to tell the world about regime’s torture before returning to Damascus

    When he spoke to lawmakers and in lecture theatres around the world, Mazen al-Hamada’s face told the story of brutal torture by Bashar al-Assad’s regime. The discovery of the Syrian activist’s body inside the notorious Sednaya prison on the outskirts of Damascus brought the news that he never lived to see its downfall.

    Hamada’s sunken eyes and haunted face, his tears as he described the depth of horrors he experienced, made him a symbol of the crimes the Assad regime committed against those who spoke out against it.

    Continue reading…

    This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.

  • In a car crash interview, shadow environment secretary Victoria Atkins has shown the Tories are still speaking from both sides of their mouth on migration. It’s a situation which is bad for the country at large and bad for the people who choose to come and live here:

    Why won’t they tell the truth?

    It’s undeniable that the following two facts are true:

    1. The Tories bashed migrants and migration throughout the 2010-2024 period in which they were in power.
    2. During that same period, net migration increased by “two and a half times”.

    So how does one explain that?

    It’s dishonest, but it’s not nonsensical. The Conservative Party increase migration because:

    So as you can see, there are clear capitalist reasons for migration. As the Tories are undeniably a capitalist party, this begs the question: why aren’t they making the capitalist argument for migration?

    The answer is that the Tories aren’t solely a capitalist party. They’re also interested in doing things like the following:

    1. Powerful and continuing nationalism
    2. Disdain for human rights
    3. Identification of enemies as a unifying cause
    4. . …
    5. . …
    6. Obsession with national security
    7. . …
    8. . …
    9. . …
    10. . …
    11. Obsession with crime and punishment
    12. . …

    In case you’re wondering, the above is a list of the “warning signs of fascism” from the U.S. Holocaust Museum. Here are some other warning signs which explain why they keep the migration tap turned on for the benefit of business owners:

    8. Corporate power protected

    9. Labor power suppressed

    . …

    . …

    . …

    12. Rampant cronyism and corruption

    The problem for the Tories is that they couldn’t get away with talking out of both sides of their mouth forever. Their failure to deal with the issue they assured us was very, very real led to the Reform Party taking a significant part of their vote share:

    ❗NEW: Tories lead, Labour plunge to 25% 😱🟦 CON 28% (+4)🟥 LAB 25% (-10)🟪 REF 19% (+4)🟧 LD 13% (+1)🟩 GRN 8% (+1)Via More In Common, 19-21 Nov (+/- vs GE2024)

    Stats for Lefties 🍉🏳️‍⚧️ (@leftiestats.bsky.social) 2024-11-21T22:45:42.537Z

    While the Tories are edging ahead of Labour in some polls right now, Reform present a real issue for them. So how are the Tories managing that problem?

    Not well, it seems, if Victoria Atkins’ performance is anything to go by:

    No answers?

    As highlighted by lawyer and activist Peter Stefanovic, Victoria Atkins repeatedly refused to answer whether her party would place a cap on migratory fruit pickers:

    Atkins and activists like Jeremy Clarkson have had some success in painting the Labour Party’s changes to inheritance tax as being a tax on ‘family farms’:

    There’s been some pushback against this narrative; not least because Clarkson himself told the Times in 2021 that avoiding inheritance tax was the “critical” reason why he purchased a farm in the first place:

    Outlets like the Guardian have run analyses on whether this measure will be the death of family farms, or whether it’s actually just an angle for the right to attack taxes on the rich. Regardless, Victoria Atkins’ interview shows the Tories haven’t changed on migration. They’re still seemingly shouting about migrants while whispering to their rich mates that they’ll have unfettered access to cheap labour.

    Atkins faced a similar issue when interviewed by the BBC’s Victoria Derbyshire:

    Her poor performance actually produced a meme:

     

    People also highlighted some other issues with what Atkins had to say:

    Victoria Atkins and Labour: farming votes

    At this point, regardless of which angle people approach the matter from, everyone knows the Tories were dishonest on migration. The problem is that Labour is making the exact same mistake:

    It’s no surprise Keir Starmer thinks the Tories’ failed approach will work for him; he’s a dishonest politician who isn’t very good at politics. And much like under the Tories, this is going to cause problems for both the country and the people coming to live here.

    Featured image via Sky News

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on Canary.

  • Border walls and fences around European countries have grown by 75% in just 10 years and EU leaders have increasingly been open to making deals with autocrats, creating a virtual border across the Mediterranean to stop migrants arriving on their shores.

    The Guardian’s senior global development reporter Mark Townsend looks back at a decade in which Europe has become a fortress, militarising its borders and moving away from the commitment to human rights on which it was founded

    Continue reading…

    This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.