Category: the


  • This content originally appeared on The Real News Network and was authored by The Real News Network.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • BANGKOK – Thailand’s air force has decided to buy a new squadron of fighter jets from Sweden rejecting a rival bid from the U.S. in spite of pressure from the Trump administration for the country to import more American goods.

    The U.S. ambassador to Bangkok lobbied the Thai government to buy the latest variants of the F-16, which were successfully sold to Vietnam, according to Thai media.

    But the Royal Thai Air Force, which mainly operates U.S.-made weaponry systems has chosen Saab’s JAS-39 Gripen E/Fs over Lockheed Martin’s F-16 Block 70/72s. saying they had “the capability to fulfill the air force’s doctrine, tactical and strategic needs.”

    Thailand currently operates five squadrons of aging F-5 E/Fs, supplied by America’s Northrop Grumman, and older F-16 variants along with 11 Gripen jets.

    Sources close to air force chief Punpakdee Pattanakul said an official announcement will be made in early June if parliament agrees a procurement plan included in the FY2026 budget for consideration.

    The first four Gripens are expected to cost 19 billion baht (US$582 million) and the air force said it planned to buy eight more.

    A JAS-39 Gripen takes off from Don Meaung Air Base on March 7, 2025.
    A JAS-39 Gripen takes off from Don Meaung Air Base on March 7, 2025.
    (Pimuk Rakkanam/RFA)

    Sources said the package will also include an undisclosed number of Meteor medium range air to air missiles as well as an upgrade to the air force’s Saab-340 airborne early warning planes.

    But a pilot-turned-politician said the plan is too expensive.

    “With a huge budget in the economic downturn and considering foreign relationships, there are more options,” Anudith Nakornthap, told reporters.

    The former F-16 pilot said the airforce should invest instead in upgrading its existing F-16s, regardless of their age.

    Edited by Mike Firn and Taejun Kang.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Pimuk Rakkanam for RFA.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • The small city has developed a reputation for its robust, coalition-based response to the threats posed to its immigrant community by federal immigration officials.


    This content originally appeared on The Progressive — A voice for peace, social justice, and the common good and was authored by Melinda Tuhus.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on Laura Flanders & Friends and was authored by Laura Flanders & Friends.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Sandra Anderson didn’t think the storm would be too bad. When her grandchildren asked if the dogs should be brought in, Anderson demurred, saying they’d be fine. But later that night, an alert on her phone warned her of a tornado tearing through her hometown of London, Kentucky. Seconds later, it hit her neighborhood.

     “I hollered for my handicapped son to hit the hallway,” Anderson said. “Windows were exploding. There was such a horrifying howl before it hit.”

    Tornadoes are measured using what’s called the Enhanced Fujita Scale, which ranks them on a scale of one to five according to their wind speed and potential for damage. The mile-wide twister that blew out Anderson’s windows and flattened entire neighborhoods traveled over 50 miles and clocked in at EF-4, making it a particularly violent one. Meanwhile, an EF-3 funnel cloud cut a 23-mile path through the St. Louis area.

    Both were part of a broader system that stretched from Missouri to Kentucky, spawning over 70 tornadoes that killed at least 28 people and leveled or damaged thousands of structures. Eastern Kentucky bore the brunt of the fury; 18 people died there. Seven more were killed in Missouri. 

    The storms come as the Trump administration makes deep cuts to the National Weather Service, or NWS, and its parent organization, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Together, the two agencies provide accurate and timely forecasts to meteorologists and others, and play a key role in forecasting tornadoes and warning people of impending danger. Meteorologists and other experts warn that the administration’s cuts to the agency could cost lives.

    The NWS has lost 600 people through layoffs and retirements, according to the New York Times, leaving many local weather stations scrambling to cover shortfalls. The office in Jackson, Kentucky, for example, is one of eight nationwide to abruptly end 24/7 forecasting after losing an overnight forecaster, and is now short about 31 percent of its staff. The Jackson office serves a large swath of eastern Kentucky, a rural region with patchy access to cell and internet, and which has been repeatedly battered by storms and floods over the past five years. 

    All of this comes as the private forecasting company Accuweather warns that the United States is facing its worst tornado season in more than a decade.

    Even as the twister in eastern Kentucky passed, people began to speculate that NWS staffing cuts contributed to the death toll. Their suspicion stemmed from the tornado warning’s upgrade to a Particularly Dangerous Situation, a designation reserved for particularly severe situations with an imminent threat to life and property. That warning, meant to convey the need to take cover immediately, came shortly before the tornado touched down at around 11:07 PM, several officials told Grist.

    Sandra Anderson and her three grandchildren, who survived the deadly tornado in eastern Kentucky, are seen sitting on their porch.
    Sandra Anderson and her grandchildren survived the deadly tornado in eastern Kentucky. The twister was more than a mile wide and left a trail of damage more than 50 miles long. Katie Myers / Grist

    That designation, called a PDS, came after the popular YouTube forecaster Ryan Hall Y’all, who is based in eastern Kentucky, urged everyone in the storm’s path to seek shelter around 10:45 pm. Local television news meteorologists did so about the same time. “We just have to hope we’re doing a good job of getting that message out there, because otherwise nobody would know,” Hall, who does not have formal meteorology training, told his audience around 10:54 PM.

    Although the NWS issued 90 alerts on May 16, including warnings about flash flooding and impending tornados, someone who identified himself as an NWS-trained weather spotter left a comment on Hall’s feed saying the agency issued the PDS only after he raised the issue. “I called the NWS in Wilmington, Ohio, who relayed my report to the Jackson weather office,” he posted. “A couple minutes after that, it was upgraded to a PDS confirmed by weather spotters.” Many commenters credited Hall with saving lives.

    Neither Hall or the commenter who identified himself as a weather spotter could be reached for comment. Chase Carson, a tourism commissioner in London, followed a forecasting livestream on Facebook as the storm developed. He spent the day after the twister volunteering at the city’s emergency response center, responding to the crisis. “You have people who had nicer homes but still didn’t think that the tornado was going to hit their area because we didn’t receive enough warning prior,” he said. “Just a lot of X, Y, and Z’s that went wrong to keep us from being able to be prepared.”

    The National Weather Service defended its handling of the storm and the timeliness of its warnings in Kentucky, telling Grist in a statement that its offices in Louisville, Jackson and Paducah “provided forecast information, timely warnings and decision support in the days and hours leading up to the severe weather on May 16.”

    “Information was conveyed to the public through multiple routine means, including official products, social media, and NOAA Weather Radio, as well as to partners through advance conference calls and webinars. As planned in advance, neighboring offices provided staffing support to the office in Jackson, KY. Additionally, the Jackson office remained fully staffed through the duration of the event using surge staffing. Weather forecast offices in the Central Region continue to evaluate storm damage and other impacts from this tragic event.”

    Tom Fahy, the legislative director for the National Weather Service Employees’ Organization, said the offices were fully staffed, and weather forecasting offices in multiple cities typically collaborate when extreme weather is expected. “People make sacrifices,” he said. “You don’t have the night off, you got to come to work.” According to Fahy, that’s part of the life of service NWS forecasters sign up for — which might intensify as offices lose staff. 

    People on the north side of St. Louis were equally suspicious of the NWS response after they did not hear warning sirens go off, even though the system had been tested the day before the tornado. However, the city runs that system, and Mayor Cara Spencer blamed the problem on “human failure” because the municipal emergency management protocol was “not exceptionally clear” on who is to activate the system. To that end, the city tested the warning sirens again Tuesday and Wednesday, and Spencer issued an executive order placing the fire department in charge of activating the warning system. 

    Aliya Lyons only knew to take shelter thanks to the St. Louis University emergency alert system. “I didn’t hear any sirens,” she said. “And that was a major failure on the city’s part. Lives were lost. I can’t say if it was entirely because of the sirens. But it’s really heartbreaking – elders may not have a cell phone, cell phones might be dead.” 

    She worries that the situation will only get worse; the Trump administration has proposed cutting NOAA’s budget by more than 25 percent. “Even with the current National Weather Service, horrible things can happen — now is not the time to gut them. We should be making it more robust.”

    Fahy said the NWS and its union are collaborating to realign staff to meet a “reduced service schedule.” The expectation will be that stations will work together to fill in gaps as needed.

    That may not do much to ease Bobby Day’s mind. He is the interim police chief in London and, worked with city officials and first responders on emergency planning with city officials, days before the tornado. He’s long counted on the Weather Service to do his job, and is never without his NOAA weather radio. He still recalls a wild and destructive storm that hit London out of the blue on a clear night a few years ago. The agency’s forecasts and warnings were essential in timing evacuations.

    “Almost to the minute they said it was going to happen, it happened,” he said.

    NOAA and the National Weather Service may well continue to deliver that level of precision even as the Trump administration slashes its budget and staffing. But meteorologists and others who deal with extreme weather worry that the suspicion and speculation that followed the tornadoes will only mount, undermining confidence in the agencies even as they become more vital to public safety. This frustrates Jim Caldwell, a meteorologist at local station WYMT-TV, who worries people will turn away from reputable, if strained, resources in favor of social media personalities like Hall — although Caldwell did not specifically mention him by name. Some of them are good forecasters, he said, but others favor sensationalization to calm preparation in a bid to gain viewers or virality.

    “With the uprise of social media and these fake weather people out there in the weather world that are not real,” he said. “We need more assistance from the government to issue warnings, issue watches, and to make sure that these hype-casters are cut off, because we need an official word.”

    This story was originally published by Grist with the headline The Kentucky tornadoes spur mounting anxiety over Weather Service warning systems on May 22, 2025.


    This content originally appeared on Grist and was authored by Katie Myers.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • States are fighting back against Donald Trump’s cuts to federal aid for teacher preparation.


    This content originally appeared on The Progressive — A voice for peace, social justice, and the common good and was authored by Brianna Nargiso Newton.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • NYC Women’s March Jan 21, 2017 (Image by David Andersson)

    The mainstream media seems to be waiting for a clash between Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum and U.S. President Donald Trump. Both figures embody starkly different visions of the present moment. Sheinbaum, Mexico’s first woman president and a self-described humanist, enjoys an approval rating around 70% and stands in constant tension with her northern neighbor. Trump, by contrast, has taken a right-wing, macho, discriminatory posture—an attempt to impose dominance on the world through fear and bullying.

    Sheinbaum’s election marks a significant step forward for women, especially in a country historically defined by machismo. Who would have imagined, even a few decades ago, that Mexico—a deeply patriarchal society—would elect a woman to its highest office?
    Her presidency is not just symbolic; it is a declaration of new values. During a press conference in Mexico City on January 31, 2025, a reporter asked President Sheinbaum about the historical significance of designating 2025 as the Year of Indigenous Women.
    Her response was breathtaking in its clarity and force. She calmly broke with conventional political rhetoric, beginning with, “Why not?” Then she continued:

    “Indigenous women represent a vindication; they are the origin of Mexico, and we have never recognized them in the way we are recognizing them now. The question is: why does this seem strange?”

    When the reporter asked whether there was another reason behind the designation, she replied:

    “Of course—there is a historical reason, a reason of social justice. Indigenous women have been historically the most discriminated against and the least recognized. And now we are claiming justice for all women, and from the beginning, who do we have to recognize first? Indigenous women, who for years have been forgotten in our history. That is the reason. So perhaps the real question is: why does it seem strange that we celebrate 2025 as the Year of Indigenous Women? There is no other reason—this is enough.”

    Sheinbaum’s answer encapsulates the essence of the ongoing revolution in women’s roles—breaking glass ceilings and honoring those whose voices have been silenced for generations. It’s not just about power; it’s about recognition, healing, and justice.

    Just a hundred years ago, women around the world were largely confined to the domestic sphere, often spending decades of their lives giving birth, raising children, and, in many cases, dying shortly after menopause. In the early 1900s, life expectancy for women in the U.S. was about 48.3 years (compared to 46.3 years for men). By 1950, it had increased to around 71 years, and by 2000, to nearly 80. These numbers reflect advances in healthcare and a radical shift in the quality and autonomy of women’s lives.

    The real revolution, however, took place not in statistics but in everyday life. Women began stepping out of the home and into public life—not as a coordinated movement, but through millions of individual acts of courage and determination. Day by day, they did things they hadn’t done the day before. They pushed boundaries—seeking education, financial independence, and visibility in all sectors: sports, entertainment, academia, science, and politics. They opened doors that had long been closed and refused to turn back.

    This transformation manifests differently across cultures but follows similar patterns. In the economic sphere, for instance, China’s tech industry now boasts that 41% of companies have at least one female founder, surpassing the representation in many Western countries. In family structures, about 21% of mothers in the United States were single mothers in 2023, reflecting women’s increased ability to form families on their own terms. In governance, the European Union now mandates gender parity in its governing bodies, institutionalizing what began as individual women’s political aspirations.

    Perhaps most telling are the migration patterns that reveal women voting with their feet. How many women, for example, have migrated alone from South America to cities like New York, fleeing machismo and seeking a better life for themselves and their children? These personal journeys represent millions of individual revolutions in consciousness—women deciding they deserve more than traditional structures offered them.

    While this quiet revolution has transformed many institutions, others remain resistant to change. Religious organizations, in particular, have often been among the last bastions of male dominance. One of the major challenges awaiting the new pope is the Catholic Church’s exclusion of women from the priesthood and senior leadership roles. How can it still be justified, in 2025, that half of humanity is denied full participation in one of the world’s most influential spiritual institutions?

    So, how did this transformation unfold—this unstoppable movement toward equality? Importantly, it didn’t emerge from political parties. Both the left and right lagged behind when it came to women’s rights; for a long time, even so-called progressive movements failed to treat women with the respect they deserved. And today, political and religious forces in many countries are actively working to reverse this progress, as seen in the erosion of abortion rights in parts of the United States.

    What makes this revolution so extraordinary is how it differs from violent political revolutions of the past. There were no firing squads, gulags, or mass exile of opponents. Women changed society by transforming themselves and their immediate environments—step by step, generation by generation—creating new possibilities for life, work, and community. And they did so without tanks, nuclear threats, concentration camps, or revenge.

    This is a revolution of consciousness—a profound shift in how half of humanity perceives itself and its possibilities. It has unfolded through presence, creativity, and persistence rather than through domination. In leaders like Sheinbaum, we see not just the fruits of this revolution but its continuation—a vision of power based not on fear but on recognition, not on domination but on justice. It is shaping a future not just for women, but for all humanity.

    The post The Quiet Revolution: Women, Power, and the Transformation of Our Time first appeared on Dissident Voice.


    This content originally appeared on Dissident Voice and was authored by David Andersson.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • I’ve been thinking a lot about community lately. Our meeting, and subsequently this interview, came about because we met–briefly–at a mutual friend’s wedding in New York in 2024. We then met, again, the next day when a different mutual friend introduced us. In the spirit of that community, I do have a couple of questions from some of our mutual friends and my personal writing community who I read your debut novel with. But I wanted to first ask, what has the role of community played throughout your writing life?

    I think community has been very central to, if not my writing practice, I would say very much the characters and ideas that I’m trying to explore in my book, [Masquerade]. I do have an MFA, and I think the primary motivation of enrolling in such a program is to find that community and structure. That was something I did when I was in New York City. I was at Queens College, a CUNY (City University of New York) school. I really enjoyed my time with my peers. I think that was the first place where I felt: okay, this is the beginning of my journey of not just [calling] myself a writer and not really [doing] anything about it, but [starting] to work towards actually producing fiction and producing more work that I was submitting and putting out into the world. Masquerade takes place primarily in New York City. I started writing [the book] in March 2020, right around the beginning of the pandemic. It was during a time when I knew I was about to leave to go to Tokyo for my PhD. I ended up getting to Japan in fall of that year and, I would say, a bulk of the book was written while I was getting settled in Tokyo and reflecting on the 12 years of time that I’d spent in New York and thinking about the relationships and the friendships I had and the ways in which those shaped me as a person throughout my 20s and into my 30s. Not all the things in the book necessarily directly correlate to my own experience. I think, in some ways, I did draw on a lot of formative experiences and relationships that made me think or feel differently about myself or about the city or about just existing in the world as a queer person. I think those are all the elements that were swirling about in the background when I was working on the first draft of the manuscript.

    In your acknowledgements, you shared that some friends read partial drafts of a novel and then you said, “Though I abandoned that sapling of a story long ago, many of its seeds drifted onward, found fertile soil again, and bloomed into this present work.” With that in mind, how or what do you consider failure, and how have you found success in it?

    I think as a writer, I don’t know if anything–I mean, this is going to sound very hokey, but like, maybe there’s no such thing as failure. I started really writing short stories probably towards the end of my undergrad years. Then, I had some time after I graduated and before I enrolled in an MFA program where I was doing other academic stuff. I was working and still writing but I didn’t quite have a sort of end goal in mind. I would say, over the years I’ve written quite a bit of work that never made it, so to speak. That was either rejected from many journals or was like a full length novel manuscript that I never got off the ground and, well, I guess you could look at those past works as possibly failures or whatnot. I think it’s true that as a writer and somebody who’s engaged in any kind of craft, the repetition and the diligence that you have to practice in approaching the work is maybe the most important part of being that person or embracing that role. So I feel like all the things that I wrote before that didn’t really go anywhere were great training grounds for myself in terms of both the actual mechanics of putting words to the page and also just understanding more about my own rhythms as a creative person. My own tendencies and idiosyncrasies. I think that’s the other thing that I’ve really struggled with over the years and really couldn’t figure out how to manage until this novel. How do I actually finish something of this length? What does my work schedule look like? Like, what’s feasible for me, individually? I think so many writers have different pieces of advice about this, right? But I feel like you really have to kind of come to a self understanding and just [assess] the things that you have going on in your personal life, your creative life and make accommodations for all of that. I think it took me years and years to actually figure out how to do that for myself.

    You’ve mentioned in past interviews that you’ve struggled with follow through. That is something I struggle with too. You just spoke about diligence and practice and I wonder what that actually looks like in terms of figuring out how to follow through with something? What did that diligence and practice look like for you, in a more practical sense?

    I think, for me, having a vague timeframe in mind like, okay this is going to be a novel and I want to finish it, let’s say, a year from now or something like that. Then, essentially, I worked on Masquerade in a period of my life when I had relative flexibility in my day-to-day schedule because I was a student again. Apart from some of the academic work that I was doing, I set aside time every day, every weekday, to sit down and write and I would plant myself at my desk. It would probably be no longer than two to three hours, at most. But I think just creating that physical routine was so important so that once I eased into that rhythm, it became more natural for me. Some days I could only get out like, a paragraph or less than that, and other days felt great. If I could get a page or so, that was amazing. I realized that, personally, I’m somebody who really thrives on structure and routine. Once I sort of instilled in myself that this is going to be a habit that I’m going to carry forward from now until completion, then I think it’s something that I can commit to, not easily but at least spiritually.

    I think in all the years prior, even during the MFA program, I look back on it now and I think I’d always wanted to write a novel. I think I just didn’t understand what it looked like in practice. So I’d have these ideas, I’d work on stuff in sort of like bursts, and get out some pages, and maybe get out a significant number of pages, but then very quickly lose steam. I know lots of other writers, maybe [Haruki] Murakami is most famous for this, but, you know, writing a novel is kind of like running a marathon or whatnot, right? It’s about stamina and maintaining a pace, but also knowing when to ease up and when to push yourself during that process.

    Did the habit change or evolve after the Masquerade project ended?

    Yeah, after I finished the first draft, I kind of let it sit for a little while before I went back to edit. In the years since that, honestly, I didn’t keep up a very good writing practice. I think that I was, of course, navigating publishing things: finding an agent, then editing the work. So, I felt quite busy, I had my hands full with that and also my academic stuff. I think, more recently, starting in January this year, I’ve returned to sort of planting myself at the desk every morning to work on a new project. And that has felt familiar and good.

    Some of my favorite parts of Masquerade are in your scene building. You’ve mentioned in previous interviews that the space of a scene is very important to you. From a craft and technical standpoint, what was the development process of these scenes? Where did you start, what were the things you were looking at as you tried to, for a lack of a better term, make it “better?”

    A lot of the physical spaces that the characters inhabit in the book are modeled after–or at least, I use as a starting point–spaces that I knew well myself, whether they were places I lived in or homes of friends that I had. I use my memories of those spaces as a blueprint for imagining a scene in there and how characters might move through it, especially when there’s dialog.

    I feel relatively comfortable writing dialog, what gets tricker is when you’re in a party scene, or sitting with multiple people and trying to imagine how the dynamics of that room are playing out. I just started watching season three of White Lotus and thinking about how that show is so good at building tension between characters and how people can have dialog with one another that kind of crosses over an awkward space; or, people talk over each other; or, don’t quite understand one another. I’m deeply interested in people, in general. That’s, of course, one of the main reasons I write; so, building and thinking about the sort of environments I wanted to put characters in, spaces that would add something to the scene, add to their understanding of each other or grease the cogs of the dynamic I am trying to produce in some way.

    This is a question from a writer friend who read this book with me. We were both curious about how do you decide when to weave in details from the past? Specifically, you have several flashback scenes within the novel. Some that are just a moment, and some that are whole sections devoted to a moment in the past. How did you make those decisions, especially since there aren’t any discernible titles or headers to indicate the switch.

    It was a tricky balance. I found that I have a really hard time writing a narrative that stays in one place and one time and unfolds in that space alone. When I write fiction, I always have this tendency or even urge to unpack a little bit of what’s beneath the surface of a particular moment and oftentimes it means revisiting, flashing back, or going to another space or time. You know, dipping our toe in that, in order to provide a better understanding of the present. I tried to balance this in Masquerade.

    First, I wrote by instinct. I did have in mind from that beginning that I [wanted to start] in the present day of 2019-ish, New York. And then, a considerable chunk of the middle of the book concerns [the main character] Meadow’s earlier years in the city. So that would be like rewinding to 2009. Although the years are never explicit, that’s kind of the general time frame. I had in mind that I was building a little bit more about the backstory over the years that moved into the present again. For the most part, the flashback chapters were pretty much linear. From the beginning, I was hoping that it would be relatively easy to kind of latch onto. But, as you mention, there are also moments in other parts of the book that are in the present day, where there are brief flashbacks or memories.

    I’d have to say, in general, having a good editor is really a huge help to kind of make this movement through time feel understandable and clean. I feel really grateful because I worked not only with my editor Elizabeth DeMeo at Tin House, who gave me wonderful advice [and] helped me massage the beginnings and ends of chapters in particular, but, before we were at Tin House, my agent, Heather Carr, was also somebody who looked at quite a few drafts of the manuscript and also helped me tighten up a lot of things over time. I feel like their support, especially, I was able to really hammer something out that was hopefully readable and kind of smooth for the most part.

    Can you say a bit more about the conversations you were having with your editor and agent in terms of structure in the overarching work?

    With Heather, we did quite a few pretty dramatic overhauls of the manuscript, this is in part because I also changed a lot over the months. Essentially, the book within a book [concept] was always there, but it [had] a completely different plot and a different set of characters and much more expansive kind of world.

    When I first went out querying with the manuscript, it kind of melted down and coalesced into the form that it ended up as in the final novel. Heather was very open, thankfully, to my making these very dramatic changes to the book within the book. But we had lots of conversations about the beginning and the end.

    I would say the stuff in the middle more or less has stayed the same. But, I had a hard time thinking about and trying to figure out where would be a good beginning and end. This also involved shifting of timelines a bit. I think in the first version of the manuscript, the Shanghai stuff was at the end of the book, so the book [was] very much in New York the whole time and then moves to Shanghai at the end. Whereas, we flipped it for the version that ended up getting published. I think a lot of questions [were] about how to create dramatic tension because in earlier drafts of the book [Meadow, the main character] doesn’t find the book until chapter three or four. It seems really basic in retrospect that it should be something planted earlier, but for whatever reason I guess I just like to dilly dally and take my time to establish a world first, and then kind of move into the thing. That’s really what we worked on with Elizabeth. It was more so looking at the individual chapters and concretizing the bets within them, trimming some fat. I think she really helped me find the shape of each chapter as a discrete unit of this book.

    In addition to being a writer, you are also an editor, a Chinese-to-English translator and, I learned through a mutual friend, you also speak French and Japanese. In regards to language, do you embody a different personality or mindset when you translate, edit, speak or write across languages?

    As someone who edits pretty regularly now–I’m working as an editor for The Japan Times–I’ve done a lot of editing of cultural and academic writing over the years. I feel like editing is something that really has helped me gain a lot of confidence in my sensibilities within the English language. I can look at a sentence, a paragraph and try to really imagine all the different possible ways you could spin out and kind of take on different nuances of meaning depending on whether you shift a clause, punctuation marks, whatnot.

    I really enjoy that sort of mechanical side of editing that also unlocks a world of creative possibility and different shades of expression. That’s something I feel very happy to be doing in my day-to-day life. With regards to other languages, I translate from Chinese and I think I would probably say that’s the second language I feel most comfortable in. Although, to be honest, I also have a very kind of awkward relationship to Chinese. I think this is something I try to talk about very bluntly as somebody who is a literary translator, but I think there’s oftentimes an idea of a translator [as] somebody who is 100 percent fluent in this language and 100 percent fluent in that language and that’s why they do the work. And I think there are maybe some cases where that’s true, but that’s definitely not me.

    I feel pretty comfortable in Chineses and tackling literary translations on my own time. Spending time by myself [and] being able to research and think about and look up words. But I am definitely quite awkward in my spoken Chinese. It’s maybe just me making up excuses, but I have not had a Chinese language environment around me for my entire adult life. My parents live in China and I do spend time there, but it’s never enough time to fully feel grounded. It’s definitely shaped my own sort of ambivalence toward my linguistic capacities. I feel very confident manipulating the English language end of things, but I guess what I’m trying to say is I recognize the need to level up more in Chinese and I’m self aware of my limitations as well.

    I know that you also translate Taiwanese manga and have become a fan of Japanese manga. Are there things that work from a storytelling perspective in those stories that maybe don’t work or you haven’t seen in another?

    I’m a relatively late bloomer when it comes to manga and anime in general. I don’t think it’s something that I necessarily had a big passion for before I moved to Japan. It’s been a really fun way to explore a certain side of Japanese culture. I really love how emphatic and outlandish the premises for certain anime and manga franchises are. Very interesting, super hyperbolic characters [and] they live in this sort of really crazy world and there’s these rules that you find out about over time that are revealed through the plot lines. I don’t feel like that’s specific to Japanese culture, per se, but I do think it’s very much threaded into what kind of storytelling is popular here. Personally, it’s very inspiring to see and read more of that work. Anime and manga are things that remind me of the sort of infinite potential for storytelling and for that reason, it’s sort of like a creative wellspring that I find really exciting to tap into and think about.

    Mike Fu Recommends a Round-Up of NYC establishments that are settings in Masquerade but aren’t named outright:

    BCD Tofu House (Koreatown)

    Housing Works (SoHo)

    Julius (West Village)

    Wu’s Wonton King (Chinatown)

    Sisters (Clinton Hill)


    This content originally appeared on The Creative Independent and was authored by Daniel Sanchez Torres.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Radio Free Asia.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Still image of a tattered Palestinian flag hanging above refugee tents in the Gaza Strip. Still image from TRNN documentary report "Gaza after Ceasefire" (2025).

    We asked people in Gaza what their thoughts were on US President Donald Trump’s stated plans to “take over the Gaza Strip” and displace the Palestinian population there. This is what they told us…

    Producer: Belal Awad, Leo Erhardt
    Videographer: Ruwaida Amer, Mahmoud Al Mashharawi
    Video Editor: Leo Erhardt


    Transcript

    Ahed Hisham Raffat Arif: 

    Who is Trump? Who is this? Where did he appear from? This is a crazy, harmful person. We will not leave Gaza, even if it were the last moment of our lives. 

    Donald Trump [CLIP]: 

    The US will take over the Gaza Strip, and we will do a proper job with it. We’ll own it and be responsible for dismantling all the dangerous unexploded bombs and other weapons on the site, clear the rubble, and remove the destroyed buildings. We’ll level the area and initiate economic development that will provide unlimited jobs and housing for the people of the region.

    Ibrahim Al Fayadh: 

    Trump’s evacuation plans are nonsense. We will stay until the end. We are losing people daily, yet still we say: “Don’t despair, God is with us” and “be strong and it will end,” and we say to Trump: your words are empty, we in Gaza are steadfast and remain until the end. 

    Abu Tha’ir: 

    This plan is new and old. In 1948 they were working on the expulsion of all Palestine from the Gaza Strip and from Jaffa… and everyone knows this. But of course, they weren’t able to empty Gaza City entirely, or erase or remove Palestine. No one would accept this, because it is rejected by the whole world and by the people of Palestine in particular: we refuse it completely. When you pull out a tree by its roots, you kill it. You won’t benefit from it in the future. For a human, who is forced to leave his land, he is being sentenced to death. 

    Mohamed El Kurdi: 

    This is the land of our ancestors. We will remain as long as the thyme and olive trees grow, by the grace of God. 

    Abu Tha’ir: 

    To be present on the land in Palestine—this is your land—you are rooted here. It’s hard to leave it. Even under threat of death, with force. It’s hard. 

    Mohamed El Kurdi: 

    We reject any plan, whether it’s from Trump or Biden—many have tried! God willing, they will fail. They attempted plans with their generals and to evacuate areas, but they have all failed. 

    Jamal Eid Qater:

    We will not leave, because this land is ours. No one can buy or sell us. We are the people of this land. We will not allow anyone to buy or sell us. We won’t leave. Pharaoh himself could come—we won’t leave. 

    Mohamed El Kurdi: 

    What was destroyed will be rebuilt. We will rebuild it better, God willing. Abu Tha’ir: 

    Some left to go to the South but others stayed under fire and death. This shows how strongly people cling to their land. To die and be buried in it is better than to be forced out. The whole world has heard and seen this reality. 

    Ahed Hisham Raffat Arif: 

    To us, Gaza is the best country—and the best city—in the world. Despite all the destruction and the blockade, look at Gaza. Gaza is my whole life. I will rebuild my home, my family, and every stone in Gaza. I will rebuild it. 

    Ibrahim Al Fayadh: 

    Gaza is my life. My blood. My veins, my breath, my soul. My eyes, my vision. Honourable Gaza. 

    Abu Tha’ir: 

    Gaza is the soul, the blood, the body, the breath. Without Gaza there is nothing. Mohamed El Kurdi: 

    Gaza is the heart, is the soul. It’s the veins filled with blood. 

    Jamal Eid Qater: 

    Gaza means everything to me. It’s my mother, my father. She is the loving mother to us. Yes. We won’t leave her.


    This content originally appeared on The Real News Network and was authored by Ruwaida Amer, Leo Erhadt, Belal Awad and Mahmoud Al Mashharawi.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Comprehensive coverage of the day’s news with a focus on war and peace; social, environmental and economic justice.

    The post The Pacifica Evening News, Weekdays – May 19, 2025 appeared first on KPFA.


    This content originally appeared on KPFA – The Pacifica Evening News, Weekdays and was authored by KPFA.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on The Real News Network and was authored by The Real News Network.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on The Real News Network and was authored by The Real News Network.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on The Intercept and was authored by The Intercept.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on The Intercept and was authored by The Intercept.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on The Intercept and was authored by The Intercept.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty and was authored by Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on Human Rights Watch and was authored by Human Rights Watch.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • May 15 marked 77 years since the Nakba, which refers to the expulsion, destruction, and ethnic cleansing of Palestinians associated with the creation of Israel in 1948. While we advocate for the colonization of Palestine to be recognized by our leaders and institutions in Canada as an injustice, we are also witnessing the Nakba continue — and even accelerate — in Israel’s genocide in the occupied Gaza Strip and West Bank.

    In Canada, even acknowledging the existence of the 1948 Nakba continues to be rejected. Nakba denial is a form of genocide denial and a mechanism for denying the Palestinian right of return. It is also a key element of anti-Palestinian racism, something that is consistently perpetuated by the Canadian media. In 2023, the Canadian government even boycotted the first ever event held by the United Nations to commemorate the Nakba, sending a message to Palestinians that their ongoing suffering is uniquely undeserving of recognition.

    What makes Nakba denial especially absurd in 2025 is that Israel is currently causing a greater scale of dispossession in Gaza than in 1948, with at least 1.9 million Palestinians forcibly displaced from their homes. This cruelty is not an accident, but by design, as one step in a deliberate plan by Israel to permanently expel Palestinians from Gaza.

    When Donald Trump announced his plan for the United States to take over Gaza and permanently expel the population, Israel’s Prime Minister Netanyahu praised it — and told lawmakers that forcing Palestinians out of Gaza was the “inevitable outcome” of his military strategy. They are blocking aid from entering Gaza, deliberately using starvation as a weapon of war — a practice strictly prohibited under international law and codified as a war crime — with the genocidal intent of ensuring that Palestinians die, if not by bomb, then by hunger. This is a way of coercing those who survive to leave Palestine.

    In a chilling message to world leaders, UN experts recently warned that we are at a “moral crossroads” in Gaza, and that states “must act now to end the violence or bear witness to the annihilation of the Palestinian population in Gaza.” Similarly, this week the UN Relief Chief challenged states: “what more evidence do you need? Will you act now – decisively – to prevent genocide in Gaza and to ensure respect for international humanitarian law?”

    How will Canada respond to this call? Prime Minister Carney has said that “President Trump’s proposed forced displacement of Palestinians from Gaza is deeply disturbing,” but he has taken no concrete steps to address it. No sanctions, no pressure, nothing that could ever hope to stop the genocide that is being openly plotted by US and Israeli leaders.

    Last year, CJPME submitted policy recommendations outlining how Canada can acknowledge and rectify the historical tragedy of the Nakba. Some of our recommendations included:

    1. Canada must officially recognize the Nakba and our role in the partition of the Mandate of Palestine.
    2. Canada must recognize Nakba denial as a form of anti-Palestinian racism and as having a direct impact on Canadians’ right to free speech and academic freedom.
    3. The Nakba is ongoing and Canada must play a role in halting it and reversing its consequences. To halt it, Canada must pressure Israel to change course by implementing boycotts, divestments, and sanctions.
    4. Canada must insist upon the right to return, restitution, and compensation for Palestine refugees, consistent with UNGA Resolution 194 and general principles of international human rights law and refugee law, and acknowledge that these rights are distinct, they are not mutually exclusive and must not be pitted against one another.
    5. Canada must play a role in demanding accountability and reparations for the Nakba (past and ongoing) by calling on the international community to set up an International Criminal Tribunal for Palestine, and by providing support to the International Criminal Court’s open investigation into war crimes committed in the Occupied Palestinian Territories.

    Acknowledging the Nakba is not just about the past, it is about the present and the future — and addressing Canada’s complicity in an ongoing genocide. As Israel advances the Nakba in Gaza while annexing the West Bank, what will Canada’s legacy be?

    The post The Nakba Never Ended first appeared on Dissident Voice.


    This content originally appeared on Dissident Voice and was authored by Canadians for Justice and Peace in the Middle East.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • We spend the whole program with Nadav Wieman, a former IDF sniper and now executive director of Breaking the Silence, an organization of Israeli veterans who expose the reality of life in the Occupied Territories and work to end the occupation. He and Ralph discuss Nadav’s experience in the IDF and his work trying to turn the tide of sentiment in Israel against the ongoing genocide.

    Nadav Weiman is the executive director of Breaking the Silence, an organization of Israeli veterans who expose the reality of life in the Occupied Territories and work to end the occupation. Mr. Weiman served in a sniper’s team in the special forces of the Nahal brigade and attained the rank of staff sergeant. He also worked as a history and literature teacher and was the legal guardian at a home for underprivileged teens in Tel Aviv.

    Now the soldiers that gave us testimonies told us that they came to the commander and said, “Okay, this is too much.” And the commander said, “Listen, we lost too many dogs in the dog unit, so we’re using Palestinians as human shields.”

    Nadav Wieman former IDF sniper and Executive Director of Breaking the Silence

    When the first soldier came to us in December 2023 and told us about using Palestinians as human shields, I thought it was an isolated event. But then another soldier came and another soldier and another soldier, and then we understood. It’s a new protocol. It’s called the Mosquito Protocol. “Mosquito,” is a code name on the radio saying, take a Palestinian man and put him in an IDF uniform, and in some cases a GoPro camera on his chest. And then soldiers were ordered to send them into tunnels to sweep the tunnels or into homes to sweep the homes.

    Nadav Wieman

    You have another protocol called “Wasp”. The Wasp Protocol is Palestinians sweeping tunnels, but this time our Palestinians working with the IDF were brought from the West Bank. And they were told that they will get something from us, a permit or something like that.

    Nadav Wieman

    News 5/16/25

    1. Trump has abruptly ended the American war on the Houthi militia in Yemen, saying in a press conference, “You know, we hit them very hard. They had a great capacity to withstand punishment…You can say there’s a lot of bravery there…It was amazing what they took. But we honor their commitment and their word,” per Prem Thakker. Behind the scenes, a New York Times report exposes the jaw-dropping waste that precipitated the U.S. backing down from this campaign. Some highlights include that the Houthis almost shot down an F-35 fighter jet – which run about $100 million apiece – that this campaign used so many precision munitions that Pentagon contingency planners grew “increasingly concerned about overall stocks,” and U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM)’s reported metric of success was “bombs dropped,” evoking the failed campaigns in Vietnam, per the Stimson Center’s Emma Ashburn. All in all, this campaign cost $1 billion over the course of just 30 days.

    2. In more stunning news of Pentagon profligacy, CNN reported on May 6th that a SECOND F/A-18 Super Hornet fighter jet fell off the USS Harry S. Truman aircraft carrier into the Red Sea following the first lost jet by just over a week. Each of these planes bear a price tag of over $60 million, according to the Navy, just in case you were wondering where your tax dollars are going now that Trump and Musk have slashed the budget of anything resembling a social program.

    3. In more foreign policy news, Edan Alexander, the last remaining U.S. citizen hostage in Gaza, has been released. Alexander was born and raised in New Jersey, then moved to Israel to serve in the IDF after graduating high school in 2022. Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu was quoted saying “[Alexander’s release] was achieved thanks to our military pressure and the political pressure exerted by President Trump. This is a winning combination.” Meanwhile Trump posted on Truth Social “Edan Alexander, American hostage thought dead, to be released by Hamas. Great news!” Despite this heraldry however, MSN reports Alexander “rebuffed” a personal meeting with Netanyahu. Counter Currents adds “In a video released by Hamas…last November, Alexander harshly criticized Netanyahu…[accusing] the Israeli leader of abandoning the…[hostages]…and urged Trump…to secure his release.” In this video, Alexander told Netanyahu, “You neglected us…We die a thousand times every day, and no one feels our pain.”

    4. In a similar vein, the Jerusalem Post reports, “The Trump administration’s Middle East envoy, Steve Witkoff, criticized Israel in a meeting with hostage families…[saying] ‘We want to bring the hostages home, but Israel is not willing to end the war.’” Witkoff added “Israel is prolonging [the war] despite the fact that we don’t see where else we can go and that an agreement must be reached.” Further, the New Arab reports “The Trump administration has…dropped its longstanding demand for Hamas to disarm as a precondition for a Gaza ceasefire.” This willingness to call a spade a spade regarding Israel’s intractable opposition to peace, or even a lasting ceasefire – coupled with a seemingly genuine willingness to realistically approach peace talks – has been a marked point of departure compared to the Biden administration, which “Never Pressured Israel for Ceasefire,” according to Israeli Ambassador Yechiel Leiter, as reported in Drop Site News.

    5. Turning to some positive consumer protection news, “Ticketmaster will now show how much you’ll pay for tickets — fees included — before checkout,” the Verge reports. This “All In Prices” initiative is an effort by the company to comply with the Federal Trade Commission’s ban on junk fees. The FTC cracked down on Ticketmaster following the 2022 Taylor Swift Eras Tour “ticketing catastrophe.” In addition to the FTC, the Department of Justice sued Ticketmaster and its parent company, Live Nation in 2024, accusing them of “driving up prices as a result of their alleged monopoly,” while the House passed the TICKET Act in 2024, a law that would “force ticket sellers to show full prices upfront.” The Senate is considering that bill now.

    6. Meanwhile, Igloo has voluntarily widened a recall of their coolers, related to “possible amputation and crushing hazards,” per ABC. The Consumer Product Safety Commission issued a recall notice for a little over a million Igloo 90 Qt. Flip & Tow Rolling Coolers back in February, on the basis that “the tow handle can pinch consumers’ fingertips against the cooler,” risking “fingertip amputation.” ABC reports this recall now includes “130,000 additional coolers, as well as approximately 20,000 in Canada and 5,900 in Mexico.” According to the CPSC, “since the recall was initiated in February, Igloo has received 78 reports of injuries involving the recalled coolers, including 26 reports of bone fractures, fingertip amputations or lacerations.”

    7. The first American Pope, Leo XIV, addressed the College of Cardinals on Sunday, in part explaining his decision to take that particular name. According to Business Insider, AI played a major role. The Pope told the college, “I chose to take the name Leo XIV…mainly because Pope Leo XIII in his historic Encyclical ‘Rerum Novarum’ addressed the social question in the context of the first great industrial revolution…In our own day, the Church offers to everyone the treasury of her social teaching in response to another industrial revolution and to developments in the field of artificial intelligence that pose new challenges for the defence of human dignity, justice, and labor.” In a January 2024 message, Pope Francis said “At this time in history, which risks becoming rich in technology and poor in humanity, our reflections must begin with the human heart.”

    8. Turning to domestic politics, 25-year-old Democratic National Committee Vice Chair David Hogg is fighting an uphill battle to remain in his post. The activist and survivor of the Marjory Stoneman Douglas school shooting has been a target of the party hierarchs since he refused to disassociate himself from the mission of the organization he cofounded – Leaders We Deserve – which seeks to primary “asleep-at-the-wheel” Democrats. On May 10th, POLITICO reported that Hogg sought a compromise with the party, vowing that he would erect a “internal firewall,” barring him from “accessing any internal DNC information about congressional and state legislative races as long as he was supporting challengers.” The DNC flatly refused. Instead, it would seem they are trying to oust Hogg by voiding his election, claiming it violated “fairness and gender diversity,” rules, per Semafor. On May 13th, the DNC’s Credentials Committee voted to nullify the results of the February election, the Hill reports. According to POLITICO, the full DNC could “opt to hold a virtual vote ahead of the meeting later this summer. Otherwise it will take the issue up during its August meeting.”

    9. In Newark, New Jersey, Mayor Ras Baraka was “arrested and detained by masked federal immigration police Friday when he joined three Democratic congressmembers set to tour a newly reopened 1,000-bed [ICE] jail run by GEO Group,” Democracy Now! reports. This is the latest installment in the power struggle between federal agents and local officials over immigration, an escalation from the arrest of Judge Hannah Dugan in April. Dugan herself was indicted this week for supposedly “obstructing or impeding a proceeding,” per Wisconsin Public Radio. Alina Habba, U.S. Attorney for the District of New Jersey, tweeted, “The Mayor of Newark…committed trespass…He has willingly chosen to disregard the law…He has been taken into custody.” She added in all caps, “NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW.” Chilling words.

    10. Finally, we pay tribute to Uruguayan revolutionary, anti-dictatorship rebel and former president José “Pepe” Mujica, who passed away this week following a protracted battle with esophageal cancer. Mujica was celebrated throughout the world during his tenure as president for his humble lifestyle; He was called ‘the world’s poorest president’ famously driving a beat-up old VW bug and donating the bulk of his salary. In 2013, he delivered a bombshell speech at the United Nations in wherein he decried capitalism and the environmental destruction it has wrought. Pulitzer Prize-winning author and historian Greg Grandin eulogized Mujica, writing “He was a member of the insurgent, armed Tupamarus, and served 14 years in prison, much of it in solitary, subject to extreme torture techniques taught by US advisors… Upon his release, he helped build the Frente Amplio into one of the most successful left coalitions. He radiated humility and humanity but he knew that power was meant to be taken and used, and behind his smile was steel. He was 89.”

    This has been Francesco DeSantis, with In Case You Haven’t Heard.



    Get full access to Ralph Nader Radio Hour at www.ralphnaderradiohour.com/subscribe


    This content originally appeared on Ralph Nader Radio Hour and was authored by Ralph Nader.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • On May 8, tensions between India and Pakistan escalated. The previous day, India had launched Operation Sindoor, targeting nine terror bases in Pakistan. Shortly after the military strikes by India, Pakistan retaliated. There was shelling and cross-border firing in several areas of Jammu and Kashmir (J&K).

    Amid this geopolitical conflict, social media was flooded with reports of drone and missile sightings across both countries. There was panic, and worries over the damage an all-out war could cause. Adding to this chaos was the coverage by several Indian news channels that aired a series of sensational and unverified claims—from Islamabad facing attacks by the Indian armed forces to Pakistan army chief Asim Munir being arrested. As the conflict intensified and public confusion mounted, sections of the Indian media descended into a maddening frenzy.

    A May 11 report by Scroll said 21 Indian civilians, including five children, were killed in J&K in the first four days of the India-Pakistan conflict. On May 10, foreign secretary Vikram Misri announced that India and Pakistan agreed to a ceasefire.

    Among all the “news” reports broadcast during the cross-border shelling, one story stood out: the decimation of the Karachi port. Many visuals showing the Karachi port in shambles surfaced on social media and were aired on segments of news channels.

    Do These Visuals Show A Wrecked Karachi Port?

    Click to view slideshow.

    The short answer is no. The visuals aired by news outlets (added above) and circulated on social media had nothing to do with the Karachi Port.

    For instance, Bengali news channel ABP Ananda aired a clip that apparently showed damage at the Karachi port after it was struck by naval aircraft carrier INS Vikrant. However, an Alt News probe revealed that the footage was actually three months old. Worse, it depicted scenes in Philadelphia after a plane crash. Philadelphia is in Pennsylvania, United States, thousands of miles away from Karachi. The channel also used a screengrab from the viral video in their online report that INS Vikrant had attacked the Karachi port, as well as their X post. However, these were later replaced by generic images of INS Vikrant and a Pakistan flag, respectively. No clarification was issued by the outlet for using the misleading image. The news report and the X post claiming  ‘extreme action’ INS Vikrant led to the Karachi port being destroyed are still live.

    In another instance, an image purportedly showing INS Vikrant’s strike on the Karachi port was used in online reports of several news outlets, including Zee News, TV9, and Amar Ujala, among others. Alt News found that the image was actually from a 2023 naval drill, not an attack. In fact, the warship featured in the viral photo wasn’t INS Vikrant, but INS Vikramaditya.

    Similarly, another visual of an explosion illuminating the night sky and smoke billowing was also circulated with claims that it showed INS Vikrant attacking the Karachi port. Alt News found that the image dates back to 2020 and is of Israel’s airstrike on Gaza. It has no connection to the India-Pakistan conflict.

    On the intervening night of May 8 and 9, news outlets had almost established that the Indian Navy had wiped out the Karachi port. It remains unclear whether they picked visuals of attacks and destruction from social media or vice versa. It’s also hard to say which is worse.

    Alt News has debunked several such clips shared with claims that they were scenes from the Karachi port.

    The Spectacle by Broadcast Media

    Late on May 9, many mainstream news channels, such as India Today, Aaj Tak, TV9 Bharatvarsh, ABP and Zee News, declared that the Indian Navy had attacked the Karachi port. They said the international port, where major business happens, was in shambles.

    ‘Exclusive’ reportage by India Today had commentary from a retired lieutenant general of the Indian Army on the ‘attack’ by the Indian Navy. Tickers flashed ‘Indian Navy attacks Pakistan’s Karachi’ and ‘Exclusive’ across the screen.

    Its Hindi counterpart, Aaj Tak, too, claimed that the Indian Navy had launched an attack on the port. As if the sequence of events and the way they were described were not dramatic enough, a blaring siren played in the background for added theatrics. Senior journalist and anchor Anjana Om Kashyap, whose face has often been associated with the channel, kept telling her co-anchor Sweta Singh that “we” successfully surrounded Pakistan from all sides. The whole production was embellished by ‘representational’ visuals of drones being launched. These representative visuals were later circulated by Pakistan-based media outlets and social media users with claims that they showed the Pakistan Army firing with its multi-rocket launcher near the Line of Control (LoC). However, Alt News fact checked this visual and found that it was sourced from the video game Arma 3.

    Zee News also said on air that the navy launched an offensive on Karachi with similar siren sounds playing in the background to heighten the drama. During one of these segments, the anchor says, “Karachi port ko tabah kar diya hain nausena ne” (The Karachi port has been demolished by the Indian Navy). This is followed by sounds of applause.

    TV9 Bharatvansh’s broadcast said that multiple explosions were heard at the Karachi port. One of the hosts of the segment says in Hindi that before making their moves on the chess board, India set all the pieces beforehand; the preparations were so meticulous that no one had an inkling. It further said that they could not reveal anything more because it would be akin to revealing intel and “we are responsible” unlike the media in Pakistan.

    The sound of the siren was used here too. This was an “All-out attack against Pakistan,” the channel said, sharing these updates on X. “Heavy damage to Karachi port due to Indian strike”.

    ABP News, too, claimed that the Indian Navy attacked Karachi. The anchor said that nearly 12 explosions were ‘reportedly’ heard in Karachi.

    By May 10, the Directorate General Fire Service, Civil Defence and Home Guards had to issue an advisory directing media channels to refrain from using air raid siren sounds in their broadcast segments. “Routine use of sirens may likely to reduce the sensitivity of civilians towards the air raids sirens,” the directive said.

    Trolls Come For The Telly

    While the Indian media was busy running these segments and propagating myths about the Karachi port, posts from social media users in Pakistan came as a brutal reality check. At 5:29 am on May 9, one social media user said, “I even woke up after sleeping, but according to Indian media, Karachi had been destroyed and I had died”. On the bulletin by Times Now Navbharat that Karachi port was attacked by INS Vikrant, another user wrote, “I think they put the wrong Karachi location in Google Maps!” One user chimed in saying, “Can someone from the indian navy currently taking over Karachi closest to my location come over I need someone to watch my baby while i pray”? Another user, seemingly confused, asked which Karachi they were showing.

    Click to view slideshow.

     

    Jibes from Pakistani accounts were one thing, but then came an official statement from the Karachi Port Trust. At 8:40 am on May 9, they said they were “operating normally & securely. All port functions, activities & operations are taking as normal routine activity.” They called the Indian media coverage “completely false and baseless”.  (Archive)

    An hour before this statement was shared, the port had already said that they were safe and their X account had been hacked. This came barely minutes after a post saying “Karachi Port has sustained heavy damage following a strike by India, resulting in unacceptable loss of property. Emergency response efforts are underway. Updates on restoration will be provided regularly. We stand resilient. #IndianNavyAction #IndiaPakistanWar #KarachiPort” was made from this account. (Archives 1, 2)

    To make clear the point that the port sustained no damage, Pakistan-based journalist Sanjay Sadhwani (@sanjaysadhwani2) posted a video of himself standing near the Karachi port at 5:25 am on May 9. (Archive)

    How Not To Report During Conflict

    This was not a case of a source going rogue or one reporter or channel getting something wrong, which can very well happen. This was a battery of news outlets making viewers believe something completely fictional in a war-like situation. A major port like Karachi being destroyed would have significantly escalated tensions. The blaring sirens and visuals of INS Vikrant may have given viewers a sense that these were sights and sounds from the site of conflict. They had little reason to doubt it since multiple channels were airing it.

    And all this despite some Indian journalists, such as WION foreign affairs editor Sidhant Sibal, clarifying that there was “No Indian Navy Action at Karachi.”

    In a press briefing on May 9, foreign secretary Vikram Misri, colonel Sofiya Qureshi, and wing commander Vyomika Singh gave updates on Pakistan’s drone attack and India’s subsequent military retaliation. At no point during this did they say anything about military action by the navy or any ‘offensive’ launched in Karachi.

    Even on May 11, Indian Navy vice admiral AN Pramod said that Indian Navy warships “remain deployed in the northern Arabian Sea in a decisive and deterrent posture with full readiness and capacity to strike select targets at sea and on land, including Karachi, at a time of our choosing”. He did not once mention that the navy had carried out an attack.

    It’s hard to find a word that fully captures the reportage that unfolded late on May 8. It was not only embarrassing and irresponsible, but absurd.

    A country’s citizens, teetering on the edge for any updates on what was happening, were led to believe that India was launching offensives in areas of civilian habitation in Pakistan and using warships as a final blow to ‘attack’ a major port. All this when the Indian defence forces kept reiterating that their military strikes were non-escalatory, focused and measured. An average citizen could have been panic-sticken and afraid. And then to be told that none of it happened is slightly bizarre.

    In future, the ‘destruction’ of the Karachi port will serve as an example of what not to do when reporting in sensitive times of conflict.

    The post The fictional strikes on the Karachi port and what it says about Indian media appeared first on Alt News.


    This content originally appeared on Alt News and was authored by Oishani Bhattacharya.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on Human Rights Watch and was authored by Human Rights Watch.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on The Real News Network and was authored by The Real News Network.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • This content originally appeared on The Real News Network and was authored by The Real News Network.


  • This content originally appeared on The Intercept and was authored by The Intercept.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on ProPublica and was authored by ProPublica.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on The Real News Network and was authored by The Real News Network.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • A minute-long video of a seemingly injured man in military fatigues is being widely circulated on social media with claims that he is an Indian Air Force (IAF) pilot whose plane was struck down by Pakistan during the recent military conflict between the two countries. The footage shows several individuals assisting him and a parachute entangled in a nearby tree. After some time, a military chopper can also be seen.

     

    This clip is among a series of unverified visuals that have gone viral after India launched Operation Sindoor on May 7, targeting nine terror camps in Pakistan. Shortly after, Pakistan retaliated with heavy mortar shelling in forward villages along the Line of Control (LoC) in the Poonch and Rajouri areas of Jammu and Kashmir. The LoC is an over 700-km de facto military border separating the two countries. The strikes by the Indian forces came a fortnight after terrorists, with alleged links to Pakistan, killed 26 civilians in Pahalgam, Kashmir. As of May 13, a ceasefire is underway but the situation remains tense. Both sides have claimed they managed to inflict significant damage to the other. In this context, the pilot’s video is being circulated by many Pakistan-based social media accounts to hint that Pakistan had an edge over India since their planes were being downed.

    X user Zafar Shirazi shared the clip on May 9 and claimed that an Indian fighter jet had crashed. The caption says that it wasn’t clear whether the pilot ejected from the jet himself, or if Indian forces shot down the plane he was flying mistakenly, or if he was captured by Pakistan. At the time of writing this, the post had nearly 850,000 views. Another Pakistan-based handle @HarisJ828 also shared the video. This post had over 1.5 million views at the time this was written. (Archived versions of these posts are here and here.) Several other social media users from Pakistan also shared the video, amplifying similar claims.

    Click to view slideshow.

     

    Fact Check

    A reverse image search of some key frames from the video led us to the same video uploaded on Facebook on March 7, 2025 by PTC news. The caption said: “Indian Air Force fighter plane Jaguar crashes” with the hashtag Ambala air base.

    Building on this, we performed a keyword search that led us to several news articles from March 7, 2025, when an Indian Air Force Jaguar fighter jet crashed in Ambala. 

    PTC News reported that the fighter jet crashed near the Baladwala village, Morni, after taking off from Ambala air base for a training flight. It said that the pilot narrowly escaped the crash by ejecting himself from the plane with a parachute. News agency PTI, too, had reported on the incident.

    According to a Times of India report, at around 3:30 PM on March 7, two Morni residents working near the area where the plane crashed heard a loud noise and saw smoke rising and rushed there. They found aircraft wreckage and the injured pilot. Villagers quickly gathered at the scene and offered the pilot water, which he declined. Soon after, an Indian Air Force (IAF) helicopter, along with IAF officials, police personnel, and fire tenders, arrived at the crash site. The report added that villagers commended the pilot for skillfully steering the aircraft away from residential areas, thus averting a potential disaster.

    A post on the official X handle of the Indian Air Force (@IAF_MCC) from March 7 confirmed the chain of events. It said that the crash happened due to a system malfunction and that before ejecting safely from the aircraft, the pilot ensured that the jet was away from any habitation.

    Additionally, a fact-check report by India’s Press Information Bureau, or PIB, also confirmed that the viral video being linked to the ongoing India-Pakistan tensions was actually from March 7, 2025, two months before India launched Operation Sindoor.

    To sum up, the video of the injured Indian Air Force pilot is from March 7, two months ago, when a Jaguar fighter jet crashed near Ambala during routine training. It has no relation to the India-Pakistan conflict.

    The post Viral video of injured IAF pilot is from March, unrelated to the India-Pakistan conflict appeared first on Alt News.

    This content originally appeared on Alt News and was authored by Ankita Mahalanobish.

  • This content originally appeared on Human Rights Watch and was authored by Human Rights Watch.