This content originally appeared on The Real News Network and was authored by The Real News Network.
This post was originally published on Radio Free.
This content originally appeared on The Real News Network and was authored by The Real News Network.
This post was originally published on Radio Free.
Leaders of African countries are arriving in Beijing this week for a China-Africa summit, at which President Xi Jinping is expected to lay out his idea of a “shared future” with African nations, underpinned by Chinese demand for minerals and political support from Global South nations.
On the second day of the Forum of China-Africa Cooperation, which runs Sept. 4-6 in the Chinese capital, Xi is expected to call for higher-quality, “green” investments, as China backs away from its earlier readiness to bankroll major infrastructure projects in favor of more sustainable public-private partnerships.
China remains keen to boost trade and gain access to raw materials from the continent, including copper, cobalt and lithium from Botswana, Namibia and Zimbabwe. But following debt restructuring agreements with Chad, Ethiopia, Ghana and Zambia, the country will likely proceed with more caution when it comes to the big loan packages that were a feature of pre-pandemic cooperation.
African countries remain the primary focus of Xi’s flagship economic cooperation program. Yet Xi’s Belt and Road Initiative has been widely criticized for ensnaring poorer countries in “debt trap” diplomacy, with Beijing wielding most of the power in partnerships that offer scant gains for local residents.
Critics say China’s approach to its economic and trade partners in Africa remains colonial and extractive, and Beijing will want to try to shift that narrative at this week’s forum.
Why is China-Africa cooperation so important to Xi Jinping?
For Xi, it’s not just about trade and economic ties. There are big political gains to be made too.
Foreign policy under Xi’s rule, now likely indefinite, has been about reshaping the U.S.-dominated international order to more closely reflect China’s needs and priorities, including exporting a more authoritarian model of governance to countries under Beijing’s political influence.
Under Xi’s vision, a rising China will spread its wings (in Chinese) and influence globally, to the point where Beijing becomes a rule-maker rather than a rule-taker, as it starts to chafe under the U.S.-led “rules-based international order.”
For that to happen, it needs other, often poorer, countries to accept its rules and act as its allies in international institutions, including organizations under the aegis of the United Nations.
Xi Jinping Thought, which has been enshrined in the ruling party charter since 2022, describes this as “reform to the global governance system,” which according to the government’s China International Development Cooperation Agency, is at a “historical turning point.”
“While China has always pursued global preeminence, it initially sought to be unobtrusive and progress stealthily with a low profile,” according to a 2023 analysis by Paul Nantulya of the Africa Center for Strategic Studies.
“The Chinese Communist Party has signaled that the era of discretion is gradually being replaced with a bolder and more assertive approach.”
How extensive is China’s presence in Africa?
Beijing’s United Front outreach and influence operations in the continent seem to be working. African countries are consistent supporters of Beijing at the United Nations, voting Chinese nationals into top jobs at several U.N. agencies and backing attempts to rewrite the rulebook on human rights, while excluding democratic Taiwan.
And a Pew Research poll from 2023 revealed that Beijing gets its highest international approval ratings from Nigeria, Kenya and South Africa.
“China’s quest to ‘reform’ international governance has found willing partners in the Global South, including Africa, which has played no small part in advancing China’s international project,” Nantulya writes, warning that Chinese influence can also pose a challenge to “core African norms” and commitments on constitutionalism, human rights and democracy.
However, China’s efforts to selectively reshape the workings of the international system — including its human rights system — can also undermine core African norms and commitments such as those on constitutionalism, human rights, and democracy, he warns.
As a BRICS nation, South Africa has signed up for China’s New Development Bank to offer an alternative to the World Bank, while several African countries have joined its Asia Infrastructure Development Bank since its founding in 2015.
And Beijing’s Global Security Initiative, a bid to export Chinese norms and security priorities, was incorporated into an action plan adopted at the last China-Africa summit in Dakar.
In recent years, China has persuaded Burkina Faso, Malawi, Liberia, Senegal and others to cut diplomatic ties with democratic Taiwan, a precondition of diplomatic recognition by Beijing.
What can we expect to see at the China-Africa summit?
According to state media, China and Africa will be launching projects with green and sustainable branding, including growing mushrooms using Chinese technology, biogas promotion and greenhouse cultivation.
Beijing also says it wants to “further increase Africa’s capacity in realizing independent and sustainable development as well as help it accelerate poverty alleviation,” the China Daily reported.
Xi Jinping’s Belt and Road Initiative will also be a prominent feature of the forum.
Chinese companies have helped to build or upgrade more than 10,000 kilometers of railways, nearly 100,000 kilometers of highways, nearly 1,000 bridges and 100 ports, and 66,000 kilometers of power transmission and distribution lines in African countries, according to state media reports. They have also helped build a 150,000-kilometer backbone communications network.
But experts expect Beijing to move away from its previous focus on eye-watering infrastructure figures in favor of healthcare, sustainable development, the digital economy and innovation.
Chinese sovereign lending, once the main source of financing for Africa’s infrastructure, is at its lowest level in two decades, according to Reuters.
Yet public-private partnerships, Beijing’s preferred new investment vehicle globally, have yet to gain traction in Africa, the agency reported.
Chinese officials at this week’s summit will be wanting to change that.
Edited by Malcolm Foster
This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by By Luisetta Mudie for RFA English.
This post was originally published on Radio Free.
This content originally appeared on The Real News Network and was authored by The Real News Network.
This post was originally published on Radio Free.
This content originally appeared on Amnesty International and was authored by Amnesty International.
This post was originally published on Radio Free.
This content originally appeared on Human Rights Watch and was authored by Human Rights Watch.
This post was originally published on Radio Free.
This content originally appeared on VICE News and was authored by VICE News.
This post was originally published on Radio Free.
This content originally appeared on The Real News Network and was authored by The Real News Network.
This post was originally published on Radio Free.
This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.
This post was originally published on Radio Free.
After nearly two decades of obstruction by the U.S. military, The New Yorker has obtained and published 10 photos of the aftermath of the 2005 Haditha massacre, when U.S. marines killed 24 Iraqi civilians in revenge for an IED bombing that killed a service member. The graphic images show dead Iraqi men, women and children, many of them shot in the head at close range. The victims ranged in age from 3 to 76. Release of the photos came only after producers of the investigative podcast In the Dark sued the Navy, the Marine Corps and U.S. Central Command to force them to turn over the photos and other records. “What the photos clearly show is that these were innocent people who do not appear to be doing anything threatening at the time of their deaths,” says Madeleine Baran, host and lead reporter of the podcast. Four marines were charged for the killings, but the charges were dismissed in three cases, and the last ended with a plea deal that did not result in a single day in prison. Baran says the survivors of the massacre, who cooperated with producers to get the photos released, are still waiting for justice. “What they want is the world to know what happened to their family, to know that their family were good people, not insurgents, and they want justice,” she says.
This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.
This post was originally published on Radio Free.
This content originally appeared on Human Rights Watch and was authored by Human Rights Watch.
This post was originally published on Radio Free.
Read RFA coverage of this story in Mandarin
Chinese authorities are holding Gao Zhen, one of the Gao Brothers artistic duo, on suspicion of ‘insulting revolutionary heroes and martyrs,’ after seizing satirical artworks depicting Chairman Mao from his home studio, Radio Free Asia has learned.
Gao Zhen, 68, who with his brother Gao Qiang has a global reputation for works of political satire, was detained by police in Sanhe city in the northern province of Hebei on Aug. 26, according to a detention notice sent to his family the following day, Gao’s lawyer and friends told RFA Mandarin.
The Gao Brothers’ dissident artwork has been shown at many venues overseas, but not publicly displayed in China since they signed an open letter from dissident physicist Fang Lizhi to then supreme leader Deng Xiaoping during the pro-democracy movement of 1989.
Police detained Gao Zhen at around 9.00 a.m. on Aug. 26, rushing into his apartment and taking him away in handcuffs, while searching his studio and questioning his wife for several hours, according to an Aug. 31 post on the Gao Brothers’ Facebook page.
State security police confiscated books, computer hard drives, and sculptures and artwork relating to late supreme leader Mao Zedong, the post said.
All of the works taken by police were created more than a decade ago, before laws on protecting the reputation of “revolutionary heroes and martyrs” took effect, it said.
China passed a law criminalizing “insults” to the ruling Communist Party’s canon of revolutionary heroes and martyrs in 2018.
Gao is currently being held in the Sanhe Detention Center on suspicion of “infringing the reputation of revolutionary heroes and martyrs,” the Facebook post said.
His lawyer Qu Zhenhong confirmed Gao’s detention to RFA Mandarin on Sunday, but declined to give further details.
“His family has received a notice [of detention], but it’s inconvenient for me to say anything more because the case is still under investigation,” Qu said.
‘Miss Mao’
U.K.-based writer Ma Jian said he had heard of Gao’s detention in a text message from his brother Gao Qiang, who lives in New York.
“According to the detention notice, he has been detained for crimes against the reputation of heroes and martyrs,” Ma said in an open letter about Gao’s detention, a copy of which was shared with RFA Mandarin.
The letter cited several sculptures from several years back including the “Miss Mao” series, depicting the late chairman with breasts, and “Mao Kneels in Repentance,” which are believed to have sparked the charges.
Signed by Ma and several other creative artists, the letter called on the Chinese government to release Gao and to repeal the legislation banning “insults” to revolutionary heroes, because it infringes on the freedom of speech guaranteed — on paper, at least — in China’s constitution.
It likened Gao’s detention to the political witch-hunts of the 1966-76 Cultural Revolution, in which the Gao brothers lost their father.
“Today, the Sanhe police department seems to see Gao Zhen’s artistic works as evidence of crime, repeating the persecution of the Cultural Revolution,” the letter said, saying that controls on Chinese artists continue to tighten under Communist Party leader Xi Jinping.
About to depart for New York
Thailand-based fellow artist Du Yinghong said Gao’s detention came as he and his family prepared to board a flight to New York, where his son was due to start school.
“We’ve booked a flight to Tokyo, and then back to New York, because our son is about to start school,” Gao says in an Aug. 26 voice note to Du, a recording of which was shared with RFA Mandarin. “I hope I’ll get a chance to organize a trip [to visit you] next year, when we can discuss art-related matters.”
Repeated calls to the Sanhe Detention Center rang unanswered on Sunday.
The other Gao Brother — Gao Qiang — responded to written questions from RFA only with the message: “Thank you for your attention.”
A person close to the case told RFA Mandarin that the detention notice included the phrase “infringing the reputation of heroes and martyrs.” It is likely that the charge relates to sculptures of late supreme leader Mao Zedong, including one of Mao “kneeling and repenting,” they said.
If the authorities can’t make that stick retroactively, they may seek evidence to support other charges typically used to target critics of the ruling Chinese Communist Party, including “subversion” and “picking quarrels and stirring up trouble,” the person said.
Raid on warehouse
Gao Zhen’s detention came alongside a police raid on his warehouse, apartment and studio in Sanhe’s Best Jingu Industrial Park, according to Ma Jian. Previous attempts by police to enter the premises in 2023 were unsuccessful as Gao Zhen was in New York for the whole of last year.
In 2011, as the authorities released artist and social critic Ai Weiwei from 80 days’ detention over alleged tax evasion, officials raided the 798 Art Village in Beijing in reaction to a satirical sculpture the brothers made of Mao as a woman.
The polished stainless steel sculpture titled “Miss Mao trying to poise herself at the top of Lenin’s head,” portrays the aging leader with signature receding hairline and facial mole, sporting a large pair of naked breasts. The Miss Mao element sits atop a large and grotesque head of Lenin, balancing with a tightrope walking pole.
A super-sized version of the sculpture was shown at the Vancouver Biennale festival in 2010, and was widely seen as a dissident work, satirizing orthodox communism and the official Chinese view of history.
Translated by Luisetta Mudie. Edited by Malcolm Foster.
This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by By Kitty Wang for RFA Mandarin.
This post was originally published on Radio Free.
This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.
This post was originally published on Radio Free.
In 1980, historian Howard Zinn published his classic work, A People’s History of the United States. The book would go on to sell over a million copies and change the way many look at history in America. We begin today’s special with highlights from a production of Howard Zinn’s Voices of a People’s History of the United States, where Zinn introduced dramatic readings from history. We hear Alfre Woodard read the words of labor activist Mother Jones and Howard’s son Jeff Zinn read the words of an IWW poet and organizer Arturo Giovannitti.
This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.
This post was originally published on Radio Free.
With assembly elections soon to be held in Haryana, political leaders from various parties have hit the campaign trail. In this context, Congress MP Kumari Selja appeared as a guest for an interview with journalist Ajit Anjum on YouTube.
During the conversation, while speaking about the inauguration and foundation stone laying of projects, she criticised the BJP’s promises. Selja remarked, “You should also look at those inaugurations to see how much has actually been completed. They don’t even spare the Ram temple; they inaugurate half of it, and Ram keeps dripping from it during the monsoon… Forget about these things, all their claims have proven to be false.” This specific part of the interview, especially her use of the phrase ‘Ram tapakna’ (dripping) has been widely shared, with claims that the Congress leader insulted the Hindu god Lord Ram using offensive language.
The video was shared by the official Haryana BJP X handle, which described Selja’s remarks as a reflection of Congress’s hatred towards the Hindu deity Ram. The post stated, “Congress has always insulted Lord Shri Ram Ji. Such language towards Shri Ram Ji is not only an insult to the Hindu faith but also an insult to all Shri Ram devotees.” (Archived link)
कांग्रेस ने हमेशा प्रभु श्रीराम जी का अपमान किया है, श्रीराम जी के प्रति ऐसी भाषा न सिर्फ सनातन धर्म का अपमान है बल्कि सभी श्रीराम भक्तों का अपमान है।#सनातन_विरोधी_कांग्रेस pic.twitter.com/lKl3AetiyY
— Haryana BJP (@BJP4Haryana) August 28, 2024
BJP spokesperson Anuja Kapoor also objected to the phrase ‘Ram tapakta rehta hai’ and criticised the language used by Kumari Selja, accusing the Congress party of insulting Lord Ram.
राम टपकता रहता है ?
काँग्रेस ने फिर किया ‘भगवान श्री राम का अपमान’
ये किस प्रकार की भाषा ?
pic.twitter.com/nJHaANUg52
— Anuja Kapur (@anujakapurindia) August 28, 2024
Similarly, BJP supporter Amit Kumar Sindhi shared the video and referred to it the “cheap language”.
Other BJP-affiliated accounts, such as Political Kida, Jitendra Pratap Singh, and Ocean Jain also shared the clip, questioning Selja’s language and calling it an indecent comment about the Hindu deity.
Click to view slideshow.In colloquial Haryanvi, ‘Ram tapakna’ refers to the dripping of raindrops. Kumari Selja’s comment in the video aligns with this context, as there were reports a few days after the Ram temple’s inauguration that water was dripping from the temple roof following heavy showers. Many users have also pointed out in the comments of the viral tweets that in Haryanvi, ‘Ram tapakna’ simply means raindrops.
We also found a video statement by Deepender Singh Hooda, a Congress MP from Haryana, published by ANI on January 15, 2024. In this video, recorded during his visit to the Ram temple in Ayodhya for Makar Sankranti, Hooda explains, “In the area where I come from, people start their day by saying Ram-Ram. In that area, when it rains, they say ‘Ram baras gaya’.” This statement clarifies that ‘Ram barasna’ means rain and is not offensive or vulgar language, but rather a common regional expression.
#WATCH | Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh: On his visit to Ayodhya, Congress MP Deepender Hooda says, “Lord Ram belongs to everyone. This is not my first visit to Ayodhya. Today we have come here to seek the blessings of Lord Ram on the occasion of Makar Sankranti…” pic.twitter.com/AopHAmdp2c
— ANI UP/Uttarakhand (@ANINewsUP) January 15, 2024
A keyword search led us to a Facebook post from 2023, which further explains that in Haryana, the word ‘Ram’ is used in various ways, including to refer to rain. The post mentions that when it rains in Haryana, people say, “Ram aaya hai,” or “Bahut Ram barsa bhai.”
The readers should note that Kumari Selja was born and brought up in Haryana and for the most part of her political career, she has worked in that state.
To sum it up, many BJP leaders and supporters misrepresented the colloquialism used by Kumari Selja, incorrectly portraying it as an insult to Hindu deity Ram. In fact, in the Haryanvi dialect, ‘Ram tapakna’ (dripping) simply refers to raindrops falling, and is not a derogatory comment.
The post ‘Ram tapakna’: Kumari Selja’s remarks taken out of context to claim she insulted the Hindu deity appeared first on Alt News.
This content originally appeared on Alt News and was authored by Abhishek Kumar.
This post was originally published on Radio Free.
This content originally appeared on chomsky.info: The Noam Chomsky Website and was authored by anthony.
This post was originally published on Radio Free.
This content originally appeared on chomsky.info: The Noam Chomsky Website and was authored by anthony.
This post was originally published on Radio Free.
This content originally appeared on The Intercept and was authored by The Intercept.
This post was originally published on Radio Free.
This content originally appeared on The Grayzone and was authored by The Grayzone.
This post was originally published on Radio Free.
This content originally appeared on The Real News Network and was authored by The Real News Network.
This post was originally published on Radio Free.
South Vietnam’s yellow flag with three red stripes – which represented the anti-communist republic until the end of the Vietnam war in 1975 – sparks strong, opposing emotions among Vietnamese, depending on who you’re talking to.
And recently, it’s been getting a lot of attention online in Vietnam.
Social media users have been digging up footage of Vietnamese celebrities performing at events in the United States where the yellow flag appeared in the background, with the aim of embarrassing them.
They’ve “outed” a string of celebrities, including singer Myra Tran, who in 2019 performed at the U.S. funeral of a former soldier in the South Vietnamese army, prompting her to apologize.
But for ethnic Vietnamese in the United States, the flag holds deep emotional significance, and they say there’s nothing to apologize for.
The conflicting sentiments around the flag show the lingering divisions that persist nearly 50 years after the end of the Vietnam War.
What does the flag represent to the Vietnamese diaspora?
The 1975 victory of the North Vietnamese forces brought the country under communist rule and triggered a mass exodus of Vietnamese in the southern part of the country to flee to the United States, Canada and elsewhere.
To those Vietnamese refugees and immigrants, the flag represents their lost homeland – the Republic of Vietnam, which existed from 1955 until 1975, a land that some of their loved ones died to protect.
It is also a symbol of resilience of those who resisted communism and overcame immense challenges to build new lives, and, most importantly, their enduring stance against communism.
Many Vietnamese immigrants have used the flag to express hatred for a communist regime that ousted them from their country.
Activists have lobbied local officials to recognize the flag representing the displaced overseas Vietnamese community. In the United States, the flag has been formally recognized by 20 states and 85 cities as of 2023, according to a resolution introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives last year that seeks to recognize the flag as a symbol of the Vietnamese immigrant community.
In cities like Westminster, California, home to a large Vietnamese American population, the flag is displayed during community events, protests and memorials. Virginia’s Eden Center, the East Coast’s largest concentration of Vietnamese businesses, also flies the South Vietnamese flag alongside the U.S. flag.
“Since I was born, I’ve always seen the yellow flag with three red stripes everywhere, and I know that it is the flag of the Vietnamese people,” 23-year-old Phuong Anh, born and raised in southern California, told RFA Vietnamese.
What does it represent to Hanoi?
In Vietnam today – represented by a red flag with a yellow star – the old South Vietnamese flag is considered a symbol of treason and defiance against the government. Showing it is seen as subversive, potentially leading to severe penalties, including imprisonment.
The flag is often associated with the so-called “reactionary forces,” a term the Vietnamese government uses to describe those who oppose its rule, including former South Vietnamese officials, their descendants, and members of the Vietnamese diaspora who fled the country after the war.
State-controlled media work hard to make sure images of the yellow flag do not appear in publications or on broadcasts, even if it is in a news report about an election campaign in the United States or a sports event.
In January 2022, for example, Vietnam Television postponed airing a soccer match in Australia due to fans waving red-striped yellow flags in the stadium.
How does the flag remain an obstacle?
The flag, as a symbol of resistance to communism, worries the Vietnamese government as it could spark opposition and dissent at home and abroad, according to experts.
In Vietnamese educational and propaganda materials, the yellow flag is depicted as something to be disavowed. As a result, many in the country are angry or hostile when they see the flag.
The tension surrounding the flag shows the legacy of the Vietnam War and the deep divisions it created. It leaves many overseas Vietnamese questioning whether the Vietnamese government is ready for reconciliation with the diaspora community and moving forward from the past.
“We can only achieve reconciliation if we understand the pain of our people,” said Johny Huy, a Vietnamese in North Carolina. “I believe these are things our nation needs to acknowledge, we need to recognize and accept the suffering of those who had to flee and escape after 1975.”
Edited by Malcolm Foster.
This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by RFA Staff.
This post was originally published on Radio Free.
This content originally appeared on The Intercept and was authored by The Intercept.
This post was originally published on Radio Free.
This content originally appeared on Laura Flanders & Friends and was authored by Laura Flanders & Friends.
This post was originally published on Radio Free.
This content originally appeared on The Intercept and was authored by The Intercept.
This post was originally published on Radio Free.
Comprehensive coverage of the day’s news with a focus on war and peace; social, environmental and economic justice.
The post The Pacifica Evening News, Weekdays – August 30, 2024 appeared first on KPFA.
This content originally appeared on KPFA – The Pacifica Evening News, Weekdays and was authored by KPFA.
This post was originally published on Radio Free.
This content originally appeared on The Grayzone and was authored by The Grayzone.
This post was originally published on Radio Free.
This content originally appeared on The Real News Network and was authored by The Real News Network.
This post was originally published on Radio Free.
This content originally appeared on AlternativeRadio and was authored by info@alternativeradio.org.
This post was originally published on Radio Free.
This content originally appeared on The Grayzone and was authored by The Grayzone.
This post was originally published on Radio Free.