Category: the

  • A woman holds a placard with the photos of detainees who disappeared during the dictatorship of Augusto Pinochet, during the search for remains of disappeared detainees, where, according to investigations, the bodies of victims of the dictatorship could be found at Cemetery No. 3 of Valparaiso, in Valparaiso, Chile, on April 2, 2025.

    For nearly 20 years, the women of Calama traveled into the desert each day to search for their loved ones.

    Monday through Sunday, sun-up to sundown, they scoured the harsh desert earth with strainers and rakes.

    Searching and hoping. 

    The crunch of the ground beneath their feet. The harsh wind whipping at their clothes. The hot sun on their faces.

    “For us there was no wind, there was no cold, there was no heat, there was no hunger,” Violeta Berríos says.

    Her partner, Mario Argüelles Toro, was a taxi driver and a local leader in the Socialist Party. It was his death sentence. 

    Mario Argüelles Toro was detained and tortured just weeks after the September 1973 coup d’état by Chilean General Augusto Pinochet.

    On October 19, 1973, Mario was taken from prison, executed, and disappeared alongside 25 others for their support for the former democratically elected President Salvador Allende.

    Executed during what they called the Chilean army’s “Caravan of Death.”

    The men’s partners and mothers responded, transforming their sadness into action. 

    They founded the Group of Family Members of the Politically Executed and Disappeared Detainees of Calama.

    They took to the desert, scratching at it each day, demanding that it reveal its secrets.

    And after years, finally, it did.

    In 1990, in a place called Quebrada del Buitre, or Vultures Gorge, on the edge of a hillside overlooking the expansive Atacama desert, the women found fragments of bones and pieces of teeth.

    This was the location their loved ones had laid buried for 17 years. But most of their bodies were no longer there. 

    Just as the women were getting closer, General Augusto Pinochet had ordered their remains dug up, removed and buried someplace else. An evil scavenger hunt, in which the rules are rigged and the dice are staked.

    Between 1990 and 2003, the women would find the partial remains of 21 of the victims.

    Today, a memorial lives on a hillside just off highway 23, heading east out of Calama. 

    This was once barren desert for miles, but it now lies beneath a sea of wind turbines. The sun burns overhead. The wind threatens to knock you over.

    The memorial is in the shape of a circle. Almost like a small amphitheater, with stairs leading down. In the middle is a patch of dry Atacama earth. Rocks and small marble stones are laid there in the shape of a cross. Pink and red flowers have been placed throughout. Pink concrete columns rise into the air. Each of them bears a name inscribed on a little plaque. The name of each of those who was detained, tortured, executed and disappeared here in the Atacama desert.

    This is the location of the mass grave, where the women of Calama finally found the fragments of bones that proved their loved ones had been here.

    Behind the memorial is a crater in the ground, where the grave was opened, and where they exhumed what they could. Rocks, in piles or in tiny circles, mark the locations where parts of their loved ones were found.

    The memorial is a sentinel in the desert. A beacon of memory. Memory of lives lost. Of the horror and the pain of the past. But also the memory of the women’s determination. Their hope and struggle. Their resistance in the desert…

    The women are still searching for and demanding justice.


    For nearly 20 years, the women of Calama traveled into the desert each day to search for their loved ones — their husbands and partners who were ripped from them, detained, tortured, executed, and disappeared in the weeks following Chile’s US-backed 1973 coup d’état.

    Monday through Sunday, sun-up to sundown, they scoured the harsh desert earth with strainers and rakes, searching and hoping. 

    And finally, in 1990, on the edge of a hillside overlooking the expansive Atacama desert, the women found fragments of bones and pieces of teeth. This was the location their loved ones had laid buried for 17 years. 

    This is the May Week of the Disappeared — a week to remember and honor those who have been forcibly disappeared and the fight for truth and justice for their families.

    This is episode 38 of Stories of Resistance—a podcast co-produced by The Real News and Global Exchange. Independent investigative journalism, supported by Global Exchange’s Human Rights in Action program. Each week, we’ll bring you stories of resistance like this. Inspiration for dark times.

    If you like what you hear, please subscribe, like, share, comment, or leave a review. 

    You can also follow Michael Fox’s reporting and support his work and this podcast at patreon.com/mfox.

    Written and produced by Michael Fox.

    Resources:

    Filmmaker Patricio Guzman’s masterpiece of a documentary, Nostalgia for the Light: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1556190

    Spanish singer Victory Manuel wrote a song for the Women of Calama: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0pkzzsK-uuA

    Mujer de Calama Afeddep Calama Dictadura Chile: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6hG5m3BYhw

    Acto de conmemoración de Afeddep a 45 años del paso de la Caravana de la Muerte por Calama: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=__pUZR-68OE

    Memorial for the Disappeared Detainees of Calama: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c2D6-es9Nnw


    This content originally appeared on The Real News Network and was authored by Michael Fox.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on The Grayzone and was authored by The Grayzone.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • See reporting on this topic in Khmer here.

    A Cambodian woman who criticized Phnom Penh’s inconclusive efforts to negotiate with Washington over trade tariffs is in the cross-hairs of Cambodian police who accuse her of trying to overthrow the government and say they’ll ask Thailand to extradite her.

    The woman, identified by police as Chhin Chou from Battambang province, had posted audio over video footage of Cambodia’s commerce minister on Facebook under the user name “Overseas Woman.” In it, she claimed that the first round of tariff negotiations between Cambodia and U.S. officials in Washington on May 15 had failed, and that the second round due in early June would also fail due to the Cambodian government’s human rights violations.

    The United States is least-developed Cambodia’s main export market and the government of Prime Minister Hun Manet is reckoning with a 49% U.S. tariff rate on its vital footwear and textile sectors unless it can reach a deal with the Trump administration.

    “Unless we follow their demands, they will not agree,” Overseas Woman posted. “We must stop illegal actions in Cambodia and ensure free and fair elections. If the Cambodian leadership cannot fulfill these conditions, then the second round of negotiations will also fail.”

    Last Friday, Cambodia’s national police last week issued a statement accusing Chhin Chou of distorting facts and incitement to overthrow the government. Describing her as an opposition activist, the police said they were preparing the legal procedures necessary to cooperate with Thai authorities to have her arrested and extradited to Cambodia.

    Thailand has previously cooperated in arrests of Cambodian opposition activists on its soil – typically doing so on the quiet because of criticism it faces from human rights activists and some Western governments when it deports refugees who could face political persecution back in Cambodia. In this case, Cambodian police took the unusual step of naming the suspect they were seeking.

    On Monday, Police Col. Katatorn Khamtieng, deputy spokesperson for Thailand’s Immigration Bureau, told Radio Free Asia that the bureau has not yet received any directive from the Thai National Police Bureau to arrest Chhin Chou.

    Ny Sokha, president of the Cambodian human rights organization Adhoc, stated that the online post does not constitute an illegal act, as it is a legitimate expression of opinion protected under the law.

    “Both national and international laws, especially the constitution, clearly guarantee Cambodian citizens’ freedom to assemble and express opinions. So in my view, we must draw a clear distinction between criminal offenses and lawful freedom of expression,” Ny Sokha said.

    RFA Khmer was able to contact Chhin Chou last week but she declined to make any comments, saying that she was seeking a safe location.

    Cambodia’s government has demonstrated a shrinking tolerance for dissenting opinions.

    According to a 2024 report from Human Rights Watch, at least 94 people were arrested by Cambodian authorities on charges of “incitement to cause serious social unrest and treason” due to criticism of the government. Of those, 59 individuals were reportedly unlawfully detained, the rights group said.

    The intolerance extends to journalists such as Ouk Mao, who had reported on logging in a wildlife sanctuary in northern Cambodia. He was arrested by plainclothes police without a warrant on May 16. He was charged with incitement and defamation.

    On Sunday, a judge at the Stung Treng Provincial Court ordered Ouk Mao’s release on bail. He is still facing 15 other complaints involving charges of illegal logging, encroachment, and burning of forestland for private ownership.

    Ouk Mao told RFA that he will continue to protect the forest more vigorously than before and is not afraid of timber traders or those who destroy forests.

    “Now I have no more fear or hesitation. I will continue protecting the forest even more strongly than before. I ask that I be given full freedom to help safeguard the forest so it can be preserved for the long term,” he said.

    Pimuk Rakkanam in Bangkok contributed reporting. Translated by Poly Sam. Edited by Mat Pennington.

    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by RFA Khmer.

  • Threats to the future of Medicare and Medicaid are fueling a popular backlash against Trump.


    This content originally appeared on The Progressive — A voice for peace, social justice, and the common good and was authored by John Nichols.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Comprehensive coverage of the day’s news with a focus on war and peace; social, environmental and economic justice.

    The post The Pacifica Evening News, Weekdays – May 26, 2025 appeared first on KPFA.


    This content originally appeared on KPFA – The Pacifica Evening News, Weekdays and was authored by KPFA.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Seg3 lamar 2

    As part of our Memorial Day special, we speak with death row inmate Keith LaMar live from the Ohio State Penitentiary, after the release of The Injustice of Justice, a short film about his case that just won the grand prize for best animated short film at the Golden State Film Festival. “I had to find out the hard way that in order for my life to be mine, that I had to stand up and claim it,” says LaMar, who has always maintained his innocence. LaMar was sentenced to death for participating in the murder of five fellow prisoners during a 1993 prison uprising. His trial was held in a remote Ohio community before an all-white jury. On January 13, 2027, the state intends to execute him, after subjecting him to three decades in solitary confinement. LaMar’s lawyer, Keegan Stephan, says his legal team has “discovered a lot of new evidence supporting Keith’s innocence” that should necessitate new legal avenues for LaMar to overturn the conviction.


    This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on Human Rights Watch and was authored by Human Rights Watch.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on The Real News Network and was authored by The Real News Network.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • On May 23, two days after security forces killed several Maoists in Chhattisgarh, the X handle of BJP Karnataka (@BJP4Karnataka) posted an animated image of Union home minister Amit Shah with a cauliflower in his hand, resting his arm on a tombstone that said, “Naxalism Rest in Peace”. (Archive)

    The image was captioned, “Lol” Salam, Comrade,” a pun on communists’ usage of the greeting “Lal Salam” or red salute.

    On May 21, 2025, the District Reserve Guard unit of the Chhattisgarh police, a special force created to combat insurgency in Chhattisgarh, carried out an anti-Naxal operation in the state’s Narayanpur district. 27 Maoists, including the general secretary of the banned Communist Party of India (Maoist), Nambala Keshav Rao, alias Basavaraju, were neutralised in this. Named Kagar, this operation sought to neutralise Maoist presence in the  Karreguttallu hill range along the Telengana-Chhattisgarh border region. 

    The May 23 post by the BJP handle was in response to a statement by the Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) Liberation (@cpimlliberation) condemning “the cold-blooded extra-judicial killing of the General Secretary of CPI(Maoist) Comrade Keshav Rao and other Maoist activists and Adivasis in Narayanpur-Bijapur.” Calling it a massacre, the communist party said, that “celebratory” posts by Indian leaders made it clear that the state was carrying out “an extra-judicial extermination campaign and taking credit for killing citizens and suppressing Adivasi protests against corporate plunder and militarisation in the name of combating Maoism.” The party was likely referring to X posts by Shah and Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who hailed the Maoists’ deaths as a “landmark achievement in the battle to eliminate Naxalism”.

    In the past 16 months, under the BJP’s governance, more than 400 alleged Maoist insurgents have been killed in Chhattisgarh, a state with a significant Adivasi population.

    While the two parties and their ideologues are on two opposing ends on how they view the Naxal movement, the troubling part is that BJP Karnataka’s X post used a trope—the cauliflower—that is a horrifying reminder of a genocide.

    Rooted in Bloodshed

    To an unsuspecting viewer, Shah holding a cauliflower on the tombstone of the Naxal movement might strike as odd, but harmless. However, the cauliflower here is a deep-rooted symbol of bloodshed. It is a reference to the 1989 Bhagalpur riots in which over a 100 Muslims were killed.

    Over 35 years ago, a series of brutal riots broke out in the city of Bhagalpur, Bihar. In October, 1989, rumours of Hindu students being murdered by Muslim mobs amid the cultural furore of the Ram Janmabhoomi movement began spreading. This gave way to a protracted period of organised communal violence, lasting around two whole months. The Bhagalpur riots, as they are called, saw more than 250 villages razed to the ground, leaving well over a thousand people dead, majority of them Muslims.

    But something far more sinister took place in Bhagalpur’s Logain village. On October 27, 1989, a mob, allegedly led by police officer Ramchander Singh, killed 116 Muslims. Their bodies were buried, and cauliflower saplings were sown on their mass graves to cover up the killings.

    Nearly 25 days later, on November 21, the then-Additional District Manager of Bhagalpur, AK Singh, on a relief mission to a nearby village, overheard conversations between villagers about cauliflower plants sprouting over buried dead bodies and unearthed the massacre. Another account suggests that Singh found out that bodies may be buried under the ground because he saw vultures hovering above the cauliflower plantations.

    For more details on the happenings in 1989 and what triggered the clashes, read our earlier report here. You can also read the Bhagalpur Riot Inquiry Commission Report here.

    The Cauliflower Imagery

    While the Bhagalpur riots took place over three decades ago, in the past few years, the cauliflower symbolism has found its way through graphical representations, imagery and memes. Each time, a minority or non-Right group is targeted, supporters who identify with Hindutva groups or the Right-wing ideology have openly made references to the cauliflower as a ‘solution’.

    In March 2025, after communal clashes broke out in Maharashtra’s Nagpur, Right-leaning social media users referred to cauliflowers, as a potential ‘solution’.

    Click to view slideshow.

    In February last year, similar cauliflower references were used in several social media posts after riots broke out in Haldwani.

    Several memes were made and shared on social media platforms glorifying the Bhagalpur massacre, subverting a horror as a feasible remedy.

    Read | Nagpur clashes: Cryptic cauliflower memes referring to mass killings in 1989 Bhagalpur riots resurface

    Not only does such symbolism trivialize the horrors of what unfolded in Bhagalpur but glorifies the action as an acceptable ‘solution’. It’s hard to determine which is more troubling, that the state wing of a party that governs the nation shared this or that “eliminating Naxalism” is being equated to a genocide. As of May 24, despite several social media users pointing out the gory undercurrents to the image, BJP Karnataka’s X handle has not taken the post down.

    The post After Maoist deaths, BJP Karnataka shares ‘cauliflower’ meme, a reference to the 1989 Bhagalpur riots appeared first on Alt News.


    This content originally appeared on Alt News and was authored by Ankita Mahalanobish.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on The Real News Network and was authored by The Real News Network.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • BANGKOK – Thailand’s air force has decided to buy a new squadron of fighter jets from Sweden rejecting a rival bid from the U.S. in spite of pressure from the Trump administration for the country to import more American goods.

    The U.S. ambassador to Bangkok lobbied the Thai government to buy the latest variants of the F-16, which were successfully sold to Vietnam, according to Thai media.

    But the Royal Thai Air Force, which mainly operates U.S.-made weaponry systems has chosen Saab’s JAS-39 Gripen E/Fs over Lockheed Martin’s F-16 Block 70/72s. saying they had “the capability to fulfill the air force’s doctrine, tactical and strategic needs.”

    Thailand currently operates five squadrons of aging F-5 E/Fs, supplied by America’s Northrop Grumman, and older F-16 variants along with 11 Gripen jets.

    Sources close to air force chief Punpakdee Pattanakul said an official announcement will be made in early June if parliament agrees a procurement plan included in the FY2026 budget for consideration.

    The first four Gripens are expected to cost 19 billion baht (US$582 million) and the air force said it planned to buy eight more.

    A JAS-39 Gripen takes off from Don Meaung Air Base on March 7, 2025.
    A JAS-39 Gripen takes off from Don Meaung Air Base on March 7, 2025.
    (Pimuk Rakkanam/RFA)

    Sources said the package will also include an undisclosed number of Meteor medium range air to air missiles as well as an upgrade to the air force’s Saab-340 airborne early warning planes.

    But a pilot-turned-politician said the plan is too expensive.

    “With a huge budget in the economic downturn and considering foreign relationships, there are more options,” Anudith Nakornthap, told reporters.

    The former F-16 pilot said the airforce should invest instead in upgrading its existing F-16s, regardless of their age.

    Edited by Mike Firn and Taejun Kang.


    This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Pimuk Rakkanam for RFA.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • The small city has developed a reputation for its robust, coalition-based response to the threats posed to its immigrant community by federal immigration officials.


    This content originally appeared on The Progressive — A voice for peace, social justice, and the common good and was authored by Melinda Tuhus.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on Laura Flanders & Friends and was authored by Laura Flanders & Friends.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Sandra Anderson didn’t think the storm would be too bad. When her grandchildren asked if the dogs should be brought in, Anderson demurred, saying they’d be fine. But later that night, an alert on her phone warned her of a tornado tearing through her hometown of London, Kentucky. Seconds later, it hit her neighborhood.

     “I hollered for my handicapped son to hit the hallway,” Anderson said. “Windows were exploding. There was such a horrifying howl before it hit.”

    Tornadoes are measured using what’s called the Enhanced Fujita Scale, which ranks them on a scale of one to five according to their wind speed and potential for damage. The mile-wide twister that blew out Anderson’s windows and flattened entire neighborhoods traveled over 50 miles and clocked in at EF-4, making it a particularly violent one. Meanwhile, an EF-3 funnel cloud cut a 23-mile path through the St. Louis area.

    Both were part of a broader system that stretched from Missouri to Kentucky, spawning over 70 tornadoes that killed at least 28 people and leveled or damaged thousands of structures. Eastern Kentucky bore the brunt of the fury; 18 people died there. Seven more were killed in Missouri. 

    The storms come as the Trump administration makes deep cuts to the National Weather Service, or NWS, and its parent organization, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Together, the two agencies provide accurate and timely forecasts to meteorologists and others, and play a key role in forecasting tornadoes and warning people of impending danger. Meteorologists and other experts warn that the administration’s cuts to the agency could cost lives.

    The NWS has lost 600 people through layoffs and retirements, according to the New York Times, leaving many local weather stations scrambling to cover shortfalls. The office in Jackson, Kentucky, for example, is one of eight nationwide to abruptly end 24/7 forecasting after losing an overnight forecaster, and is now short about 31 percent of its staff. The Jackson office serves a large swath of eastern Kentucky, a rural region with patchy access to cell and internet, and which has been repeatedly battered by storms and floods over the past five years. 

    All of this comes as the private forecasting company Accuweather warns that the United States is facing its worst tornado season in more than a decade.

    Even as the twister in eastern Kentucky passed, people began to speculate that NWS staffing cuts contributed to the death toll. Their suspicion stemmed from the tornado warning’s upgrade to a Particularly Dangerous Situation, a designation reserved for particularly severe situations with an imminent threat to life and property. That warning, meant to convey the need to take cover immediately, came shortly before the tornado touched down at around 11:07 PM, several officials told Grist.

    Sandra Anderson and her three grandchildren, who survived the deadly tornado in eastern Kentucky, are seen sitting on their porch.
    Sandra Anderson and her grandchildren survived the deadly tornado in eastern Kentucky. The twister was more than a mile wide and left a trail of damage more than 50 miles long. Katie Myers / Grist

    That designation, called a PDS, came after the popular YouTube forecaster Ryan Hall Y’all, who is based in eastern Kentucky, urged everyone in the storm’s path to seek shelter around 10:45 pm. Local television news meteorologists did so about the same time. “We just have to hope we’re doing a good job of getting that message out there, because otherwise nobody would know,” Hall, who does not have formal meteorology training, told his audience around 10:54 PM.

    Although the NWS issued 90 alerts on May 16, including warnings about flash flooding and impending tornados, someone who identified himself as an NWS-trained weather spotter left a comment on Hall’s feed saying the agency issued the PDS only after he raised the issue. “I called the NWS in Wilmington, Ohio, who relayed my report to the Jackson weather office,” he posted. “A couple minutes after that, it was upgraded to a PDS confirmed by weather spotters.” Many commenters credited Hall with saving lives.

    Neither Hall or the commenter who identified himself as a weather spotter could be reached for comment. Chase Carson, a tourism commissioner in London, followed a forecasting livestream on Facebook as the storm developed. He spent the day after the twister volunteering at the city’s emergency response center, responding to the crisis. “You have people who had nicer homes but still didn’t think that the tornado was going to hit their area because we didn’t receive enough warning prior,” he said. “Just a lot of X, Y, and Z’s that went wrong to keep us from being able to be prepared.”

    The National Weather Service defended its handling of the storm and the timeliness of its warnings in Kentucky, telling Grist in a statement that its offices in Louisville, Jackson and Paducah “provided forecast information, timely warnings and decision support in the days and hours leading up to the severe weather on May 16.”

    “Information was conveyed to the public through multiple routine means, including official products, social media, and NOAA Weather Radio, as well as to partners through advance conference calls and webinars. As planned in advance, neighboring offices provided staffing support to the office in Jackson, KY. Additionally, the Jackson office remained fully staffed through the duration of the event using surge staffing. Weather forecast offices in the Central Region continue to evaluate storm damage and other impacts from this tragic event.”

    Tom Fahy, the legislative director for the National Weather Service Employees’ Organization, said the offices were fully staffed, and weather forecasting offices in multiple cities typically collaborate when extreme weather is expected. “People make sacrifices,” he said. “You don’t have the night off, you got to come to work.” According to Fahy, that’s part of the life of service NWS forecasters sign up for — which might intensify as offices lose staff. 

    People on the north side of St. Louis were equally suspicious of the NWS response after they did not hear warning sirens go off, even though the system had been tested the day before the tornado. However, the city runs that system, and Mayor Cara Spencer blamed the problem on “human failure” because the municipal emergency management protocol was “not exceptionally clear” on who is to activate the system. To that end, the city tested the warning sirens again Tuesday and Wednesday, and Spencer issued an executive order placing the fire department in charge of activating the warning system. 

    Aliya Lyons only knew to take shelter thanks to the St. Louis University emergency alert system. “I didn’t hear any sirens,” she said. “And that was a major failure on the city’s part. Lives were lost. I can’t say if it was entirely because of the sirens. But it’s really heartbreaking – elders may not have a cell phone, cell phones might be dead.” 

    She worries that the situation will only get worse; the Trump administration has proposed cutting NOAA’s budget by more than 25 percent. “Even with the current National Weather Service, horrible things can happen — now is not the time to gut them. We should be making it more robust.”

    Fahy said the NWS and its union are collaborating to realign staff to meet a “reduced service schedule.” The expectation will be that stations will work together to fill in gaps as needed.

    That may not do much to ease Bobby Day’s mind. He is the interim police chief in London and, worked with city officials and first responders on emergency planning with city officials, days before the tornado. He’s long counted on the Weather Service to do his job, and is never without his NOAA weather radio. He still recalls a wild and destructive storm that hit London out of the blue on a clear night a few years ago. The agency’s forecasts and warnings were essential in timing evacuations.

    “Almost to the minute they said it was going to happen, it happened,” he said.

    NOAA and the National Weather Service may well continue to deliver that level of precision even as the Trump administration slashes its budget and staffing. But meteorologists and others who deal with extreme weather worry that the suspicion and speculation that followed the tornadoes will only mount, undermining confidence in the agencies even as they become more vital to public safety. This frustrates Jim Caldwell, a meteorologist at local station WYMT-TV, who worries people will turn away from reputable, if strained, resources in favor of social media personalities like Hall — although Caldwell did not specifically mention him by name. Some of them are good forecasters, he said, but others favor sensationalization to calm preparation in a bid to gain viewers or virality.

    “With the uprise of social media and these fake weather people out there in the weather world that are not real,” he said. “We need more assistance from the government to issue warnings, issue watches, and to make sure that these hype-casters are cut off, because we need an official word.”

    This story was originally published by Grist with the headline The Kentucky tornadoes spur mounting anxiety over Weather Service warning systems on May 22, 2025.


    This content originally appeared on Grist and was authored by Katie Myers.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • States are fighting back against Donald Trump’s cuts to federal aid for teacher preparation.


    This content originally appeared on The Progressive — A voice for peace, social justice, and the common good and was authored by Brianna Nargiso Newton.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • NYC Women’s March Jan 21, 2017 (Image by David Andersson)

    The mainstream media seems to be waiting for a clash between Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum and U.S. President Donald Trump. Both figures embody starkly different visions of the present moment. Sheinbaum, Mexico’s first woman president and a self-described humanist, enjoys an approval rating around 70% and stands in constant tension with her northern neighbor. Trump, by contrast, has taken a right-wing, macho, discriminatory posture—an attempt to impose dominance on the world through fear and bullying.

    Sheinbaum’s election marks a significant step forward for women, especially in a country historically defined by machismo. Who would have imagined, even a few decades ago, that Mexico—a deeply patriarchal society—would elect a woman to its highest office?
    Her presidency is not just symbolic; it is a declaration of new values. During a press conference in Mexico City on January 31, 2025, a reporter asked President Sheinbaum about the historical significance of designating 2025 as the Year of Indigenous Women.
    Her response was breathtaking in its clarity and force. She calmly broke with conventional political rhetoric, beginning with, “Why not?” Then she continued:

    “Indigenous women represent a vindication; they are the origin of Mexico, and we have never recognized them in the way we are recognizing them now. The question is: why does this seem strange?”

    When the reporter asked whether there was another reason behind the designation, she replied:

    “Of course—there is a historical reason, a reason of social justice. Indigenous women have been historically the most discriminated against and the least recognized. And now we are claiming justice for all women, and from the beginning, who do we have to recognize first? Indigenous women, who for years have been forgotten in our history. That is the reason. So perhaps the real question is: why does it seem strange that we celebrate 2025 as the Year of Indigenous Women? There is no other reason—this is enough.”

    Sheinbaum’s answer encapsulates the essence of the ongoing revolution in women’s roles—breaking glass ceilings and honoring those whose voices have been silenced for generations. It’s not just about power; it’s about recognition, healing, and justice.

    Just a hundred years ago, women around the world were largely confined to the domestic sphere, often spending decades of their lives giving birth, raising children, and, in many cases, dying shortly after menopause. In the early 1900s, life expectancy for women in the U.S. was about 48.3 years (compared to 46.3 years for men). By 1950, it had increased to around 71 years, and by 2000, to nearly 80. These numbers reflect advances in healthcare and a radical shift in the quality and autonomy of women’s lives.

    The real revolution, however, took place not in statistics but in everyday life. Women began stepping out of the home and into public life—not as a coordinated movement, but through millions of individual acts of courage and determination. Day by day, they did things they hadn’t done the day before. They pushed boundaries—seeking education, financial independence, and visibility in all sectors: sports, entertainment, academia, science, and politics. They opened doors that had long been closed and refused to turn back.

    This transformation manifests differently across cultures but follows similar patterns. In the economic sphere, for instance, China’s tech industry now boasts that 41% of companies have at least one female founder, surpassing the representation in many Western countries. In family structures, about 21% of mothers in the United States were single mothers in 2023, reflecting women’s increased ability to form families on their own terms. In governance, the European Union now mandates gender parity in its governing bodies, institutionalizing what began as individual women’s political aspirations.

    Perhaps most telling are the migration patterns that reveal women voting with their feet. How many women, for example, have migrated alone from South America to cities like New York, fleeing machismo and seeking a better life for themselves and their children? These personal journeys represent millions of individual revolutions in consciousness—women deciding they deserve more than traditional structures offered them.

    While this quiet revolution has transformed many institutions, others remain resistant to change. Religious organizations, in particular, have often been among the last bastions of male dominance. One of the major challenges awaiting the new pope is the Catholic Church’s exclusion of women from the priesthood and senior leadership roles. How can it still be justified, in 2025, that half of humanity is denied full participation in one of the world’s most influential spiritual institutions?

    So, how did this transformation unfold—this unstoppable movement toward equality? Importantly, it didn’t emerge from political parties. Both the left and right lagged behind when it came to women’s rights; for a long time, even so-called progressive movements failed to treat women with the respect they deserved. And today, political and religious forces in many countries are actively working to reverse this progress, as seen in the erosion of abortion rights in parts of the United States.

    What makes this revolution so extraordinary is how it differs from violent political revolutions of the past. There were no firing squads, gulags, or mass exile of opponents. Women changed society by transforming themselves and their immediate environments—step by step, generation by generation—creating new possibilities for life, work, and community. And they did so without tanks, nuclear threats, concentration camps, or revenge.

    This is a revolution of consciousness—a profound shift in how half of humanity perceives itself and its possibilities. It has unfolded through presence, creativity, and persistence rather than through domination. In leaders like Sheinbaum, we see not just the fruits of this revolution but its continuation—a vision of power based not on fear but on recognition, not on domination but on justice. It is shaping a future not just for women, but for all humanity.

    The post The Quiet Revolution: Women, Power, and the Transformation of Our Time first appeared on Dissident Voice.


    This content originally appeared on Dissident Voice and was authored by David Andersson.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • I’ve been thinking a lot about community lately. Our meeting, and subsequently this interview, came about because we met–briefly–at a mutual friend’s wedding in New York in 2024. We then met, again, the next day when a different mutual friend introduced us. In the spirit of that community, I do have a couple of questions from some of our mutual friends and my personal writing community who I read your debut novel with. But I wanted to first ask, what has the role of community played throughout your writing life?

    I think community has been very central to, if not my writing practice, I would say very much the characters and ideas that I’m trying to explore in my book, [Masquerade]. I do have an MFA, and I think the primary motivation of enrolling in such a program is to find that community and structure. That was something I did when I was in New York City. I was at Queens College, a CUNY (City University of New York) school. I really enjoyed my time with my peers. I think that was the first place where I felt: okay, this is the beginning of my journey of not just [calling] myself a writer and not really [doing] anything about it, but [starting] to work towards actually producing fiction and producing more work that I was submitting and putting out into the world. Masquerade takes place primarily in New York City. I started writing [the book] in March 2020, right around the beginning of the pandemic. It was during a time when I knew I was about to leave to go to Tokyo for my PhD. I ended up getting to Japan in fall of that year and, I would say, a bulk of the book was written while I was getting settled in Tokyo and reflecting on the 12 years of time that I’d spent in New York and thinking about the relationships and the friendships I had and the ways in which those shaped me as a person throughout my 20s and into my 30s. Not all the things in the book necessarily directly correlate to my own experience. I think, in some ways, I did draw on a lot of formative experiences and relationships that made me think or feel differently about myself or about the city or about just existing in the world as a queer person. I think those are all the elements that were swirling about in the background when I was working on the first draft of the manuscript.

    In your acknowledgements, you shared that some friends read partial drafts of a novel and then you said, “Though I abandoned that sapling of a story long ago, many of its seeds drifted onward, found fertile soil again, and bloomed into this present work.” With that in mind, how or what do you consider failure, and how have you found success in it?

    I think as a writer, I don’t know if anything–I mean, this is going to sound very hokey, but like, maybe there’s no such thing as failure. I started really writing short stories probably towards the end of my undergrad years. Then, I had some time after I graduated and before I enrolled in an MFA program where I was doing other academic stuff. I was working and still writing but I didn’t quite have a sort of end goal in mind. I would say, over the years I’ve written quite a bit of work that never made it, so to speak. That was either rejected from many journals or was like a full length novel manuscript that I never got off the ground and, well, I guess you could look at those past works as possibly failures or whatnot. I think it’s true that as a writer and somebody who’s engaged in any kind of craft, the repetition and the diligence that you have to practice in approaching the work is maybe the most important part of being that person or embracing that role. So I feel like all the things that I wrote before that didn’t really go anywhere were great training grounds for myself in terms of both the actual mechanics of putting words to the page and also just understanding more about my own rhythms as a creative person. My own tendencies and idiosyncrasies. I think that’s the other thing that I’ve really struggled with over the years and really couldn’t figure out how to manage until this novel. How do I actually finish something of this length? What does my work schedule look like? Like, what’s feasible for me, individually? I think so many writers have different pieces of advice about this, right? But I feel like you really have to kind of come to a self understanding and just [assess] the things that you have going on in your personal life, your creative life and make accommodations for all of that. I think it took me years and years to actually figure out how to do that for myself.

    You’ve mentioned in past interviews that you’ve struggled with follow through. That is something I struggle with too. You just spoke about diligence and practice and I wonder what that actually looks like in terms of figuring out how to follow through with something? What did that diligence and practice look like for you, in a more practical sense?

    I think, for me, having a vague timeframe in mind like, okay this is going to be a novel and I want to finish it, let’s say, a year from now or something like that. Then, essentially, I worked on Masquerade in a period of my life when I had relative flexibility in my day-to-day schedule because I was a student again. Apart from some of the academic work that I was doing, I set aside time every day, every weekday, to sit down and write and I would plant myself at my desk. It would probably be no longer than two to three hours, at most. But I think just creating that physical routine was so important so that once I eased into that rhythm, it became more natural for me. Some days I could only get out like, a paragraph or less than that, and other days felt great. If I could get a page or so, that was amazing. I realized that, personally, I’m somebody who really thrives on structure and routine. Once I sort of instilled in myself that this is going to be a habit that I’m going to carry forward from now until completion, then I think it’s something that I can commit to, not easily but at least spiritually.

    I think in all the years prior, even during the MFA program, I look back on it now and I think I’d always wanted to write a novel. I think I just didn’t understand what it looked like in practice. So I’d have these ideas, I’d work on stuff in sort of like bursts, and get out some pages, and maybe get out a significant number of pages, but then very quickly lose steam. I know lots of other writers, maybe [Haruki] Murakami is most famous for this, but, you know, writing a novel is kind of like running a marathon or whatnot, right? It’s about stamina and maintaining a pace, but also knowing when to ease up and when to push yourself during that process.

    Did the habit change or evolve after the Masquerade project ended?

    Yeah, after I finished the first draft, I kind of let it sit for a little while before I went back to edit. In the years since that, honestly, I didn’t keep up a very good writing practice. I think that I was, of course, navigating publishing things: finding an agent, then editing the work. So, I felt quite busy, I had my hands full with that and also my academic stuff. I think, more recently, starting in January this year, I’ve returned to sort of planting myself at the desk every morning to work on a new project. And that has felt familiar and good.

    Some of my favorite parts of Masquerade are in your scene building. You’ve mentioned in previous interviews that the space of a scene is very important to you. From a craft and technical standpoint, what was the development process of these scenes? Where did you start, what were the things you were looking at as you tried to, for a lack of a better term, make it “better?”

    A lot of the physical spaces that the characters inhabit in the book are modeled after–or at least, I use as a starting point–spaces that I knew well myself, whether they were places I lived in or homes of friends that I had. I use my memories of those spaces as a blueprint for imagining a scene in there and how characters might move through it, especially when there’s dialog.

    I feel relatively comfortable writing dialog, what gets tricker is when you’re in a party scene, or sitting with multiple people and trying to imagine how the dynamics of that room are playing out. I just started watching season three of White Lotus and thinking about how that show is so good at building tension between characters and how people can have dialog with one another that kind of crosses over an awkward space; or, people talk over each other; or, don’t quite understand one another. I’m deeply interested in people, in general. That’s, of course, one of the main reasons I write; so, building and thinking about the sort of environments I wanted to put characters in, spaces that would add something to the scene, add to their understanding of each other or grease the cogs of the dynamic I am trying to produce in some way.

    This is a question from a writer friend who read this book with me. We were both curious about how do you decide when to weave in details from the past? Specifically, you have several flashback scenes within the novel. Some that are just a moment, and some that are whole sections devoted to a moment in the past. How did you make those decisions, especially since there aren’t any discernible titles or headers to indicate the switch.

    It was a tricky balance. I found that I have a really hard time writing a narrative that stays in one place and one time and unfolds in that space alone. When I write fiction, I always have this tendency or even urge to unpack a little bit of what’s beneath the surface of a particular moment and oftentimes it means revisiting, flashing back, or going to another space or time. You know, dipping our toe in that, in order to provide a better understanding of the present. I tried to balance this in Masquerade.

    First, I wrote by instinct. I did have in mind from that beginning that I [wanted to start] in the present day of 2019-ish, New York. And then, a considerable chunk of the middle of the book concerns [the main character] Meadow’s earlier years in the city. So that would be like rewinding to 2009. Although the years are never explicit, that’s kind of the general time frame. I had in mind that I was building a little bit more about the backstory over the years that moved into the present again. For the most part, the flashback chapters were pretty much linear. From the beginning, I was hoping that it would be relatively easy to kind of latch onto. But, as you mention, there are also moments in other parts of the book that are in the present day, where there are brief flashbacks or memories.

    I’d have to say, in general, having a good editor is really a huge help to kind of make this movement through time feel understandable and clean. I feel really grateful because I worked not only with my editor Elizabeth DeMeo at Tin House, who gave me wonderful advice [and] helped me massage the beginnings and ends of chapters in particular, but, before we were at Tin House, my agent, Heather Carr, was also somebody who looked at quite a few drafts of the manuscript and also helped me tighten up a lot of things over time. I feel like their support, especially, I was able to really hammer something out that was hopefully readable and kind of smooth for the most part.

    Can you say a bit more about the conversations you were having with your editor and agent in terms of structure in the overarching work?

    With Heather, we did quite a few pretty dramatic overhauls of the manuscript, this is in part because I also changed a lot over the months. Essentially, the book within a book [concept] was always there, but it [had] a completely different plot and a different set of characters and much more expansive kind of world.

    When I first went out querying with the manuscript, it kind of melted down and coalesced into the form that it ended up as in the final novel. Heather was very open, thankfully, to my making these very dramatic changes to the book within the book. But we had lots of conversations about the beginning and the end.

    I would say the stuff in the middle more or less has stayed the same. But, I had a hard time thinking about and trying to figure out where would be a good beginning and end. This also involved shifting of timelines a bit. I think in the first version of the manuscript, the Shanghai stuff was at the end of the book, so the book [was] very much in New York the whole time and then moves to Shanghai at the end. Whereas, we flipped it for the version that ended up getting published. I think a lot of questions [were] about how to create dramatic tension because in earlier drafts of the book [Meadow, the main character] doesn’t find the book until chapter three or four. It seems really basic in retrospect that it should be something planted earlier, but for whatever reason I guess I just like to dilly dally and take my time to establish a world first, and then kind of move into the thing. That’s really what we worked on with Elizabeth. It was more so looking at the individual chapters and concretizing the bets within them, trimming some fat. I think she really helped me find the shape of each chapter as a discrete unit of this book.

    In addition to being a writer, you are also an editor, a Chinese-to-English translator and, I learned through a mutual friend, you also speak French and Japanese. In regards to language, do you embody a different personality or mindset when you translate, edit, speak or write across languages?

    As someone who edits pretty regularly now–I’m working as an editor for The Japan Times–I’ve done a lot of editing of cultural and academic writing over the years. I feel like editing is something that really has helped me gain a lot of confidence in my sensibilities within the English language. I can look at a sentence, a paragraph and try to really imagine all the different possible ways you could spin out and kind of take on different nuances of meaning depending on whether you shift a clause, punctuation marks, whatnot.

    I really enjoy that sort of mechanical side of editing that also unlocks a world of creative possibility and different shades of expression. That’s something I feel very happy to be doing in my day-to-day life. With regards to other languages, I translate from Chinese and I think I would probably say that’s the second language I feel most comfortable in. Although, to be honest, I also have a very kind of awkward relationship to Chinese. I think this is something I try to talk about very bluntly as somebody who is a literary translator, but I think there’s oftentimes an idea of a translator [as] somebody who is 100 percent fluent in this language and 100 percent fluent in that language and that’s why they do the work. And I think there are maybe some cases where that’s true, but that’s definitely not me.

    I feel pretty comfortable in Chineses and tackling literary translations on my own time. Spending time by myself [and] being able to research and think about and look up words. But I am definitely quite awkward in my spoken Chinese. It’s maybe just me making up excuses, but I have not had a Chinese language environment around me for my entire adult life. My parents live in China and I do spend time there, but it’s never enough time to fully feel grounded. It’s definitely shaped my own sort of ambivalence toward my linguistic capacities. I feel very confident manipulating the English language end of things, but I guess what I’m trying to say is I recognize the need to level up more in Chinese and I’m self aware of my limitations as well.

    I know that you also translate Taiwanese manga and have become a fan of Japanese manga. Are there things that work from a storytelling perspective in those stories that maybe don’t work or you haven’t seen in another?

    I’m a relatively late bloomer when it comes to manga and anime in general. I don’t think it’s something that I necessarily had a big passion for before I moved to Japan. It’s been a really fun way to explore a certain side of Japanese culture. I really love how emphatic and outlandish the premises for certain anime and manga franchises are. Very interesting, super hyperbolic characters [and] they live in this sort of really crazy world and there’s these rules that you find out about over time that are revealed through the plot lines. I don’t feel like that’s specific to Japanese culture, per se, but I do think it’s very much threaded into what kind of storytelling is popular here. Personally, it’s very inspiring to see and read more of that work. Anime and manga are things that remind me of the sort of infinite potential for storytelling and for that reason, it’s sort of like a creative wellspring that I find really exciting to tap into and think about.

    Mike Fu Recommends a Round-Up of NYC establishments that are settings in Masquerade but aren’t named outright:

    BCD Tofu House (Koreatown)

    Housing Works (SoHo)

    Julius (West Village)

    Wu’s Wonton King (Chinatown)

    Sisters (Clinton Hill)


    This content originally appeared on The Creative Independent and was authored by Daniel Sanchez Torres.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Radio Free Asia.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Still image of a tattered Palestinian flag hanging above refugee tents in the Gaza Strip. Still image from TRNN documentary report "Gaza after Ceasefire" (2025).

    We asked people in Gaza what their thoughts were on US President Donald Trump’s stated plans to “take over the Gaza Strip” and displace the Palestinian population there. This is what they told us…

    Producer: Belal Awad, Leo Erhardt
    Videographer: Ruwaida Amer, Mahmoud Al Mashharawi
    Video Editor: Leo Erhardt


    Transcript

    Ahed Hisham Raffat Arif: 

    Who is Trump? Who is this? Where did he appear from? This is a crazy, harmful person. We will not leave Gaza, even if it were the last moment of our lives. 

    Donald Trump [CLIP]: 

    The US will take over the Gaza Strip, and we will do a proper job with it. We’ll own it and be responsible for dismantling all the dangerous unexploded bombs and other weapons on the site, clear the rubble, and remove the destroyed buildings. We’ll level the area and initiate economic development that will provide unlimited jobs and housing for the people of the region.

    Ibrahim Al Fayadh: 

    Trump’s evacuation plans are nonsense. We will stay until the end. We are losing people daily, yet still we say: “Don’t despair, God is with us” and “be strong and it will end,” and we say to Trump: your words are empty, we in Gaza are steadfast and remain until the end. 

    Abu Tha’ir: 

    This plan is new and old. In 1948 they were working on the expulsion of all Palestine from the Gaza Strip and from Jaffa… and everyone knows this. But of course, they weren’t able to empty Gaza City entirely, or erase or remove Palestine. No one would accept this, because it is rejected by the whole world and by the people of Palestine in particular: we refuse it completely. When you pull out a tree by its roots, you kill it. You won’t benefit from it in the future. For a human, who is forced to leave his land, he is being sentenced to death. 

    Mohamed El Kurdi: 

    This is the land of our ancestors. We will remain as long as the thyme and olive trees grow, by the grace of God. 

    Abu Tha’ir: 

    To be present on the land in Palestine—this is your land—you are rooted here. It’s hard to leave it. Even under threat of death, with force. It’s hard. 

    Mohamed El Kurdi: 

    We reject any plan, whether it’s from Trump or Biden—many have tried! God willing, they will fail. They attempted plans with their generals and to evacuate areas, but they have all failed. 

    Jamal Eid Qater:

    We will not leave, because this land is ours. No one can buy or sell us. We are the people of this land. We will not allow anyone to buy or sell us. We won’t leave. Pharaoh himself could come—we won’t leave. 

    Mohamed El Kurdi: 

    What was destroyed will be rebuilt. We will rebuild it better, God willing. Abu Tha’ir: 

    Some left to go to the South but others stayed under fire and death. This shows how strongly people cling to their land. To die and be buried in it is better than to be forced out. The whole world has heard and seen this reality. 

    Ahed Hisham Raffat Arif: 

    To us, Gaza is the best country—and the best city—in the world. Despite all the destruction and the blockade, look at Gaza. Gaza is my whole life. I will rebuild my home, my family, and every stone in Gaza. I will rebuild it. 

    Ibrahim Al Fayadh: 

    Gaza is my life. My blood. My veins, my breath, my soul. My eyes, my vision. Honourable Gaza. 

    Abu Tha’ir: 

    Gaza is the soul, the blood, the body, the breath. Without Gaza there is nothing. Mohamed El Kurdi: 

    Gaza is the heart, is the soul. It’s the veins filled with blood. 

    Jamal Eid Qater: 

    Gaza means everything to me. It’s my mother, my father. She is the loving mother to us. Yes. We won’t leave her.


    This content originally appeared on The Real News Network and was authored by Ruwaida Amer, Leo Erhadt, Belal Awad and Mahmoud Al Mashharawi.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Comprehensive coverage of the day’s news with a focus on war and peace; social, environmental and economic justice.

    The post The Pacifica Evening News, Weekdays – May 19, 2025 appeared first on KPFA.


    This content originally appeared on KPFA – The Pacifica Evening News, Weekdays and was authored by KPFA.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on The Real News Network and was authored by The Real News Network.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on The Real News Network and was authored by The Real News Network.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on The Intercept and was authored by The Intercept.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on The Intercept and was authored by The Intercept.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on The Intercept and was authored by The Intercept.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty and was authored by Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.