Category: UK

  • Rishi Sunak’s Spring Statement just confirmed that most people claiming social security from the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) are, in his eyes, worthless. Because the chancellor has done nothing for millions of people on so-called benefits. In fact, Sunak has further consigned them to the ‘digital workhouse’: entrenching poverty and misery under the DWP system.

    A Spring Statement for the rich

    The Spring Statement contained no new measures on social security. The one mention of it was to say what the government did in 2021. Sunak failed to address the fact that around 10 million households are facing at least a £290 real terms cut to their social security. This is on top of things like the benefit cap which has caused persistent child poverty.

    Sunak has also done nothing about energy prices for poor people – unless you can afford to install solar panels or heat pumps. So, most households will see a £1,300 increase in their energy bills by October 2022. The Spring Statement did take 5p a litre off fuel duty. But again, that means nothing for the poorest households – 35% of whom have cars versus 93% of the richest ones.

    A big announcement of bullshit

    Sunak’s main announcement was an increase in the threshold at which people start paying National Insurance. It’s now the same as income tax – so £12,570, an increase of £3k. Overall, this is supposed to mean an average £330 extra in people’s pockets. But again, this is nonsense for the poorest people – among them chronically ill and disabled people who can’t work; unpaid carers; those on Jobseeker’s Allowance, and part-time workers who didn’t meet the National Insurance threshold in the first place.

    Moreover, it means little for those who do pay National Insurance but also have to claim Universal Credit. This is because the 55% Universal Credit taper rate at which the DWP cuts your social security payment will swallow much of the £330 back-up anyway.

    The digital workhouse expands

    All Sunak’s Spring Statement has done is to continue an ideological drive by the Conservatives. As I previously warned in 2018, the Tories designed Universal Credit with a Victorian mindset of the ‘deserving’ and ‘undeserving’ poor:

    Sick, disabled, unemployed and low earning people would no longer be different, distinct benefit groups. They would become one, homogeneous ‘underclass’ of people. And… the state would give minimal support to these people. Instead, charities and communities should carry the burden of this workless/underemployed group.

    In May 2019, UN rapporteur Philip Alston called Universal Credit a ‘digital workhouse‘. Sunak’s Spring Statement has now cemented that vision. He’s done nothing to support the poorest people amid the worst cost of living crisis in decades. Instead, Sunak has locked millions of low-paid workers, social security claimants, and chronically ill and disabled people into this digital workhouse. Their incomes will continue to fall behind everyone else’s – trapping them in poverty and misery. And sadly, there seems no way out of the digital workhouse on the horizon.

    Featured image via Wellcome Images – Wikimedia, cropped to 770×403 under licence CC BY 4.0, Wikimedia and Sky News – YouTube

    By Steve Topple

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • NHS workers took a clear message to Rishi Sunak before his Spring Statement. You couldn’t miss their demo either, as they hired an open-top bus to send the statement to the government and chancellor: ‘where’s the £350m for the NHS?’

    SOS NHS

    SOS NHS is a coalition of campaign groups. Some of those involved include:

    • Keep Our NHS Public.
    • Unite the Union.
    • GMB Union.
    • NHS Workers Say No.

    Its website states that:

    In 2010, after a decade of investment, our NHS was delivering its best-ever performance: after more than a decade of austerity – despite heroic efforts by staff – it has sunk to its worst-ever. The problems were there before the pandemic but have been deepened by the continued high level of Covid infections.

    Indeed. As The Canary documented at the end of 2021, last year saw record waiting times; staff under intolerable stress; potentially catastrophic government ‘reforms’, and an insulting pay offer for workers. So, SOS NHS has some clear demands for the government:

    1. Approve emergency funding of £20bn to save lives this winter
    2. Invest in a fully publicly owned NHS and guarantee free healthcare for future generations
    3. Pay staff properly: without fair pay, staffing shortages will cost lives

    These may sound broad, but SOS NHS is also quite specific with some of its demands. For example, it says the £20bn includes:

    £8bn needed now to rebuild crumbling infrastructure and reopen beds left empty since Covid-19 struck

    So, on Tuesday 22 March, the group took these demands on the road to Downing Street.

    Touring London for the NHS

    SOS NHS organised an open-top bus ‘tour’ of central London. Or rather, it hired a battle bus to take its important message around the capital:

    The side of the bus had a message on it aimed at PM Boris Johnson:

    SOS NHS’s message was also for Sunak:

    Some MPs, including independent Jeremy Corbyn, joined the demo:

    Then, the bus made a stop outside parliament where more MPs came out to support it:

    And finally, the group handed a petition with its demands in to Downing Street:

    By 10am on Wednesday 23 March, over 179,000 people had signed it.

    Time for “mass mobilising”

    Holly Turner from NHS Workers Say No told The Canary:

    Yesterday was a high energy day of action. It was great to have frontline workers, campaign orgs, trade unions and cross party MPs out fighting together for the future of our health service and its workforce. This has always been an aim of the SOSNHS campaign, to encourage mass mobilising across movements so that we can apply direct pressure to the government. Our health service is on fire, and without immediate funding the situation will continue to become more critical.

    Spring Statement: more money ‘saving’ on the cards

    It looks like Sunak’s Spring Statement contains little for the NHS or its workers. In fact, days earlier he announced an “efficiency drive” (cuts to you and me) for the health service. This comes after the government has spent years underfunding it. So, it remains to be seen what the long-term picture for the NHS will be like. Thankfully, frontline staff are dedicated to doing all they can to protect it. And we should all thank them for that.

    Watch Reel News’s short film following the SOS NHS demo:

    Featured image via NHS Workers Say No

    By Steve Topple

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • A decision by the Public Prosecution Service (PPS) to discontinue a murder prosecution of Soldier F for two deaths on Bloody Sunday in Derry in 1972 has been quashed at the High Court in Belfast.

    Delivering the ruling, Lady Chief Justice Siobhan McKeegan said the decision by the PPS not to continue the prosecution “crossed the threshold of irrationality”.

    Case collapsed

    The PPS announced last year it was discontinuing the prosecution of Soldier F for the murders of James Wray and William McKinney. This came amid concerns the case could collapse in light of a separate court ruling on the admissibility of evidence which caused the collapse of another Troubles (name for the 30-year conflict in Ireland) murder trial involving two military veterans.

    The McKinney family then launched a judicial review to challenge the PPS decision.

    Bloody Sunday 50th anniversary
    Flowers at a Bloody Sunday memorial (Brian Lawless/PA)

    Campaigners react

    Following the High Court decision, campaigners expressed their delight while also acknowledging there’s still some way to go. They restated that their quest for justice will continue:

    “There has already been considerable delay”

    Delivering the verdict on Wednesday, the Lady Chief Justice said:

    We consider that the decision crosses the threshold of irrationality where it simply does not add up, or in other words there is an error of reasoning which robs the decision of logic.

    It follows that the matter should remain with the PPS to reconsider the decision.

    There has already been considerable delay in the criminal process and so it may be that the swiftest and most effective course is actually for the district judge to be asked to rule on the admissibility issue in the first instance.

    It may be that public confidence in the interests of justice are best served by a definitive judicial determination on this issue by a court properly seized of the merits.

    The PPS will now have to decide on the next steps.

    However, judicial reviews taken by a number of other Bloody Sunday families to challenge the PPS not to take prosecutions against five other veterans were dismissed by the court. The Lady Chief Justice said she considered there was “no error in law” in these decisions.

    Bloody Sunday was one of the darkest days in the North of Ireland’s history. British soldiers shot dead 13 civil rights protesters in the Bogside area of Derry with a 14th person dying four months later.

    Featured image via – History is Happening/YouTube Screengrab On Demand News – YouTube screengrab

    By The Canary

  • An estimate from the United Nations (UN) shows that by the end of 2021, 377,000 people will have been killed during the war in Yemen. Around 150,000 people have been killed from the conflict, and many more have died from disease and hunger caused by the humanitarian crisis Yemen now faces.

    Saudi Arabia has been leading a coalition that has been bombing Yemen since March 2015. The UK, however, has provided the supplies for much of this bombing. This choice to continue to supply weapons to Saudi Arabia in its campaign against Yemen has the same roots as the majority of Western-led involvement with conflicts in the area: oil.

    How do we know that?

    The Campaign Against Arms Trade (CAAT) released research in February 2022 which shows that the:

    published value of UK arms licensed for export to the Saudi-led coalition since the bombing began in March 2015 is £8.4 billion (including £7.0 billion to Saudi Arabia alone) [our emphasis]

    According to its own estimates, however, this figure jumps sharply:

    CAAT estimates that the real value of arms to Saudi Arabia is over £20 billion, while the value of sales to the Coalition as a whole (including UAE and others) is over £22 billion. [our emphasis]

    CAAT make it clear that the UK’s monetary support is vital to the ongoing Saudi presence in Yemen. Human Rights Watch has said:

    armed conflict in Yemen has resulted in the largest humanitarian crisis in the world

    CAAT have been given permission to proceed with a legal challenge to stop the UK government’s arms sales to Saudi Arabia. In a previous legal challenge, the Court of Appeal ruled that approving arms sales to Saudi was “‘irrational and therefore unlawful”. However, after a temporary suspension, arms sales have resumed with foreign secretary Lizz Truss claiming that violations of international law were “isolated incidents”.

    The Yemen Data Project has the following figures for casualties in Yemen (as of 18 March 2022):

    Almost 25,000 air rids from the Saudi-led coalition is a catastrophically high number. The UK’s supply of weapons to the Saudis has facilitated these figures.

    Greasy palms

    Last week, Boris Johnson paid a visit to Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. The trip has been touted as an attempt to reduce the UK’s reliance on Russian oil. The Canary’s Joe Glenton reported on how Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe’s recent release from prison in Iran also bears the context of sanctions against Russia restricting oil supplies to the UK:

     Russian oil is going to be less accessible as sanctions pile up following the Putin regime’s invasion of Ukraine. Other sources must be found. It follows that a thaw between the West and Iran is on the cards.

    Johnson’s visit to Saudi Arabia is, then, part of a more general effort to remain in the good books of oil suppliers like Saudi Arabia, and Iran. Whilst Vladimir Putin’s horrific invasion of Ukraine is rightly condemned, Johnson seems to be happy to cosy up to Saudi Arabia and its government’s awful human rights records. Much like Zaghari-Ratcliffe was a pawn in geopolitical relations between the UK and Iran, so too are the people of Yemen made into pawns caught between the UK’s desire for oil and willingness to ignore morality when convenient.

    Who will help?

    March 2021 saw an update from the House of Commons library which summarises a significant cut in aid for Yemen. Initially, £160m was due to go to Yemen in 2020/21, but only 54% of that was actually announced in 2021 – a downgrade to £87 million.

    At the time, the government admitted that it hadn’t even done an impact assessment on this decision.

    Of course, Russia’s recent invasion of Ukraine has also seen devastating and horrific loss. However, it is difficult to swallow the UK government’s support of Ukraine and its citizens as anything more than lip-service.

    While it is wonderful that UK citizens want to open their homes to refugees from Ukraine, and are doing what they can to show solidarity, the story cannot end there. Expressions of solidarity are vitally necessary, but that solidarity shouldn’t ignore the Black, brown, Muslim, and otherwise marginalised communities whose blood is on the hands of the UK government.

    One understanding of whether a country is at war might be a physical presence in an outside nation. That is an outdated and ineffective understanding. Modern warfare and the global market means that the UK is indeed at war, not just with Yemen, but also with other countries the UK is selling arms exports to. The UK has played an active role in the assaults on Yemen. To then cut whatever patchwork humanitarian aid may have been possible is monstrous beyond belief. The UK is at war with Yemen, has killed people in Yemen, has decisively contributed to the humanitarian crisis in Yemen – and Yemen can’t fight back.

    The UK has blood on its hands, and its modern relations to countries like Yemen are a modern approach to coloniality: neocolonialism.

    Featured image via screenshot/Evening Standard – cropped to 770×403

    By Maryam Jameela

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • The government is not doing enough for refugees. After showing reluctance to allow any refugees fleeing Ukraine to come to the UK, there is finally a scheme in place, but it still falls extremely short of the mark. The French interior minister quite rightly accused the UK government of showing a “lack of humanity” towards Ukrainian refugees. He also warned that some refugees may try to cross the English channel by boat if they have no other options available.

    The plan now in place is the Homes for Ukraine Scheme. However, this requires the sponsorship of refugees by British citizens. This is a wonderful step, but the government should take more responsibility for receiving and re-homing refugees – not just rely on the public to do its job for it.

    Justice secretary Dominic Raab attempted to justify reports that 150 Ukrainian refugees had been turned away for not having correct visas. He stated that the government won’t “just open the door” because that would “undermine the popular support” for helping “the genuine refugees”. It’s unclear whether Raab thinks that some Ukrainians are not “genuine refugees” or is simply taking the opportunity to bash non-European refugees who also need help.

    Deadly alternatives

    Denying entry to refugees or reducing their rights is also an issue of international law. The Nationality and Borders Bill has now made it’s way through the House of Lords and is awaiting votes on amendments in the House of Commons. The UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) is urging the government not to overturn the removal of Clause 11, which would give most refugees a lower status and fewer benefits The UNHCR states that this would:

    cause unnecessary suffering to refugees fleeing war and persecution

    It also says it would be in “direct breach” of the 1951 UN Refugee Convention (and its 1967 Protocol).

    The alternative to allowing safe entry is already a well-documented tragedy. Entering the country via small boats is extremely dangerous. In 2021 alone, 44 people died or went missing attempting to cross the British Channel via boat. Other routes can be as equally deadly. In October 2019, 39 Vietnamese people died in a lorry in Essex. It’s our duty as a country to welcome and help those in need, not to turn the journey into a deadly gauntlet or to turn people away at the border.

    We should remember that refugees are human beings – not just statistics or a commodity to put an arbitrary value on. They should be given a safe and welcoming space that respects their human rights and treats them humanely.

    Not a new issue

    Of course, resistance to immigration is not a new issue. The Windrush Scandal provides both current and historic evidence that migrants faced pushback for entering the country, as well as trying to remain here. When Windrush migrants arrived in 1948, politicians on both sides of the aisle in Britain reacted negatively. 11 Labour MPs wrote a letter to prime minister Clement Atlee stating their displeasure:

    An influx of coloured people domiciled here is likely to impact the harmony, strength and cohesion of our public and social life and to cause discord and unhappiness among all concerned.

    Conservative MP Cyril Osborne spoke on People of Colour entering the country:

    they have altogether a different standard of civilisation, to begin with.

    Both reactions are xenophobic, but not a far cry from Tory statements in the last few years.

    Ongoing struggles

    Unfortunately, fleeing war and persecution is, of course, not an issue unique to Ukraine. I spoke to Anwar, a refugee from Afghanistan, and asked him about his experience.

    When asked how he travelled to the UK, Anwar said:

    I came by a very difficult way… Iran first, then to Turkey, Bulgaria, Serbia, Hungary, Austria, Germany, France, then to England. I travelled through the borders via trucks, cars and a lot of walking. The chance of dying was 75%.

    I asked Anwar how he was treated when he got to the UK border. He replied:

    I was in a holding cell for 48 hours but still very well.

    When asked if there was anything that would make his life in the UK better, he said:

    Now that I am here, all I want is to be equal. I want to work and pay my own way. Make a family and live life.

    His experience will parallel those coming from Ukraine. People have a high chance of injury or death en route to the Ukrainian border followed by travel through unfamiliar countries. The goal is also clearly the same. Refugees just want equal treatment, to be with their families, and to live life. However, they are not all treated the same:

    Racism at the Borders

    The unequal treatment is also visible between Ukrainian refugees. The majority of refugees evacuating Ukraine are white. But People of Colour are also trying to escape the conflict in Ukraine and have experienced racism and attacks trying to leave. And in Poland, for example, People of Colour are being attacked by white nationalists. The Canary has previously reported on the racism refugees face.

    Meanwhile, refugees from Afghanistan or Syria are treated like a burden, and a problem to solve, with mention of military bases alluding to notions of invasion. By contrast, Ukrainian refugees are shown as desperate and worthy of help. This is an abhorrent comparison. Without international condemnation and attention, Ukrainian refugees would likely face the same media hostility as other refugees.

    Enough is enough!

    The government needs to consider the trauma that refugees have experienced en route as well as the situation that caused them to leave their home country in the first place. For Ukraine and many other countries, that situation is war. Instead of refusing entry to refugees, we should be respecting their human rights and giving them fair treatment and care.

    We need to take note of the history of the hostile environment that has been created in the UK. We should be taking a stand against the ever-tougher measures imposed on those entering this country. And we must say enough is enough and have our voices heard by those in power. International law must be followed and the government must treat refugees like human beings.

    Featured image via Danny Howard/Flickr cropped to 770 x 403 licensed under CC BY 2.0

    By Daniel Winder

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • The Metropolitan Police’s approach to tackling corruption within their ranks is “not fit for purpose”, a watchdog has found.

    “Unacceptable”

    The force has not learned lessons from the notorious unsolved 1987 murder of private investigator Daniel Morgan, overall its procedures for rooting out corrupt staff are “fundamentally flawed” and it has a “degree of indifference” to the risks, according to damning findings published on 22 March.

    The home secretary called in Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire and Rescue Services (HMICFRS) after an independent inquiry into how the force handled Morgan’s case found it was institutionally corrupt, saying it had concealed or denied failings to protect its reputation.

    Inspector of constabulary Matt Parr said that the Met had “sometimes behaved in ways that make it appear arrogant, secretive and lethargic” and that the watchdog’s 20 recommendations for change must be “among the commissioner’s highest priorities” in order to restore public trust in the force. He added:

    It is unacceptable that 35 years after Daniel Morgan’s murder, the Metropolitan Police has not done enough to ensure its failings from that investigation cannot be repeated. In fact, we found no evidence that someone, somewhere, had adopted the view that this must never happen again. This will be understandably distressing for Mr Morgan’s family and friends, to whom we send our condolences.

    We found substantial weaknesses in the Met’s approach to tackling police corruption. From failing to properly supervise police officers who have previously committed offences, to inadequate vetting procedures, and much more besides, it is clear that the current arrangements are not fit for purpose.

    The Met’s apparent tolerance of these shortcomings suggests a degree of indifference to the risk of corruption.

    Still not capable

    According to the findings:

    – In the last two years, the Met recruited people with criminal connections and more than 100 people who have committed offences. Some of these decisions “may have been justifiable, but the force failed to properly supervise these people to lessen the risks”.

    – Property and exhibits procedures were “dire”. Hundreds of items were not accounted for, including cash and drugs. In one instance, the security access code for a property store was written on the outside of the door.

    – The force does not know whether all those in sensitive posts – such as child protection, major crime investigation, and informant handling – have been cleared to the level of security vetting needed.

    – More than 2,000 warrant cards issued to personnel who had since left the force were unaccounted for.

    – The Met still “does not have the capability to proactively monitor its IT systems, despite repeated warnings from the inspectorate”. IT monitoring is used by most forces to help identify corrupt staff.

    The watchdog did acknowledge the force’s “capability to investigate the most serious corruption allegations is particularly impressive, and other police forces regularly call on their expertise” and also praised its confidential reporting line and support provided to whistleblowers.

    It also recognised that the Met had greatly reduced the number of personnel who were not security vetted.

    Daniel Morgan
    Daniel Morgan, a private investigator who was killed with an axe in the car park of the Golden Lion pub in Sydenham, south-east London, on March 10 1987 (Family handout/PA)

    “Culture of corruption”

    The inspection found “no evidence of any deliberate or co-ordinated attempts” by the Met to “frustrate” the work of the Morgan inquiry. It said that although there was much to criticise, based on this inspection “it would not describe the Met as institutionally corrupt”.

    Morgan’s family – who are suing the Met – claimed a “culture of corruption” continues to “flourish at the highest ranks” of the Met.

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • Julian Assange is one step closer to being extradited to the US has the court received ‘assurances’ that the US will offer adequate prison conditions. Listen to Curtis Daly’s reaction.

    By Curtis Daly

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • A journalist who investigated the 1974 Birmingham pub bombings will not have to hand over his notes to police after they lost a legal bid to force him to reveal his sources.

    Chris Mullin, 74, challenged an application by West Midlands Police to require him to disclose source material dating back to his investigation in 1985 and 1986.

    Speaking after an Old Bailey judge ruled he would not have to hand over the material, Mullin said he was “grateful” for the judge’s decision, adding that the right of a journalist to protect sources is “fundamental to a free press in a democracy”.

    Chris Mullin court case
    Chris Mullin speaks to the media outside the Old Bailey in London (Jonathan Brady/PA)

    A victory for journalism

    In his book, Error Of Judgement, and a series of documentaries, Mullin helped expose one of the worst miscarriages of justice, leading to the release of the Birmingham Six after their convictions were quashed in 1991.

    Twenty-one people were killed in the bomb attack on two pubs in Birmingham on November 21 1974.

    West Midlands Police used the Terrorism Act to bring the production order application.

    Handing down his ruling on Tuesday morning, the judge Mark Lucraft said: “I decline to grant the production order sought.”

    He said there were three issues that the court had to determine.

    The first was whether Mr Mullin had the material in his possession and if so what such material does he have.

    The judge wrote:

    On this issue, I find that CM (Chris Mullin) does have material in his possession, custody or power that comes within the wording of the production order as refined in the course of the hearing.

    The second issue was whether there were “reasonable grounds for believing that the material is likely to be of substantial value, whether by itself or together with other material, to a terrorist investigation”.

    The judge wrote: “On this issue, I find that the condition is made out.”

    He said the third issue was whether there are

    reasonable grounds for believing that it is in the public interest that the material should be produced, or that access to it should be given having regard to the benefit likely to accrue to a terrorist investigation if it is obtained and to the circumstances under which CM has the material in his possession, custody or power.

    The judge continued:

    In effect, is there a clear and compelling case that there is an overriding public interest that might displace CM’s strong Article 10 right to protect his confidential journalistic source along with the Court considering its discretion?

    On this issue I do not find an overriding public interest to displace the journalistic source protection right. I decline to grant the production order sought.

    Chris Mullin
    Chris Mullin said he was grateful the judge had ruled in his favour (Jonathan Brady/PA)

    “This is a landmark freedom of expression decision”

    Speaking after the ruling was handed down, Mullin said:

    The right of a journalist to protect his or her sources is fundamental to a free press in a democracy. My actions in this case were overwhelmingly in the public interest.

    They led to the release of six innocent men after 17 years in prison, the winding up of the notorious West Midlands Serious Crimes Squad and the quashing of a further 30 or so wrongful convictions.

    This case also resulted in the setting up a Royal Commission which, among other reforms, led to the setting up of the Criminal Cases Review Commission and the quashing of another 500 or more wrongful convictions.

    My investigation is also the main reason why the identity of three of the four bombers is known

    Mullin’s solicitor said the judgment was a “landmark” for freedom of expression.

    Louis Charalambous, of Simons Muirhead Burton, said:

    This is a landmark freedom of expression decision which properly recognises the public interest in Chris Mullin’s journalism which led to the release of the Birmingham Six.

    If a confidential source cannot rely on a journalist’s promise of lifelong protection then these investigations will never see the light of day.”

     

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • As William and Kate embark on a charm offensive tour of the Caribbean, people are taking to the streets and social media to let them know they’re not welcome.

    The tour to commemorate the Queen’s Platinum Jubilee began on 19 March. Their first stop is Belize, and locals have not let the visit go unchallenged. In a victory for the people – and embarrassingly for the Royals – a visit to Indian Creek village was hastily cancelled due to protests. William and Kate had been due to visit a cacao farm owned by Flora and Fauna International (FFI), of which the prince is a patron. But residents held up signs saying “Colonial legacy of theft continues” because FFI continues to prevent the villagers from accessing land. The villagers said they felt “disrespected”, as they weren’t even told about the impending visit.

    Britain should apologise for “crimes against humanity”

    Next on William and Kate’s tour is Jamaica. People plan to take to the streets in the capital of Kingston too. As race correspondent Nadine White tweets:

    August will see the island’s 60th anniversary of independence from British colonial rule. Inevitably, the Jamaican people are questioning how a nation can possibly decolonise if queen Elizabeth is still head of state. So, for the royals, the visit to Jamaica will be especially important as they use their charm to try to prevent the island from doing what Barbados did in November 2020, when it removed Elizabeth as its head.

    The open letter, written by Advocates Network (an alliance of Jamaican activists and human rights associations), reads:

    We will not participate in your Platinum Jubilee celebration!

    It continues:

    We see no reason to celebrate 70 years of the ascension of your grandmother to the British throne because her leadership, and that of her predecessors, have perpetuated the greatest human rights tragedy in the history of humankind.

    We are of the view that an apology for British crimes against humanity, including but not limited to, the exploitation of the indigenous people of Jamaica, the transatlantic trafficking of Africans, the enslavement of Africans, indentureship and colonialization, is necessary to begin a process of healing, forgiveness, reconciliation and compensation.

    Advocates Network has laid out 60 reasons why Britain needs to apologise and give reparations to Jamaica. The reasons include “the exploitation of indigenous people”, “capturing their land”, “for human trafficking across the Atlantic Ocean in the transatlantic trade of enslaved peoples”, and for “genocide and massacres”.

    A crumbling monarchy

    The royal tour will finish in the Bahamas. During the course of the visit, we should expect lots of images and videos in the mainstream press, showing the usual white saviourist actions of William and Kate as they pose for photos – decked in all their wealth. All the while they’ll try to persuade these nations that they shouldn’t cut ties with the monarchy.

    Over the past year, the royal family has tried to salvage itself after numerous disgraces. We’ve seen Andrew Windsor buying his way out of child sexual assault allegations, while last year’s famous Harry and Meghan interview explicitly pointed out the current racism within the monarchy. The last thing the royals will want is for more commonwealth nations to cut ties with them.

    Barbados, Belize, and Jamaica have all showed the royals that they need to go back to where they came from: it’s inevitable that more countries will follow suit.

    Featured image via MSN / screengrab, resized to 770 x 403 px

    By Eliza Egret

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • A second Foreign Office whistleblower has backed up claims that Boris Johnson was directly involved in the decision to evacuate cats and dogs from Afghanistan.

    The evacuation of animals from the Nowzad charity sparked controversy last year as thousands trying to flee the Taliban after the fall of Kabul were left behind.

    But the Prime Minister has repeatedly denied he was directly involved in the decision to bring the animals out of the country, saying claims were “complete nonsense”, despite emails and whistleblower evidence suggesting the opposite.

    Further evidence

    Raphael Marshall, who worked for the Foreign Office at the time, previously gave evidence and revealed an email showing an official in Foreign Office minister lord Goldsmith’s private office telling colleagues on August 25 that “the PM has just authorised their staff and animals to be evacuated”.

    Now, a second Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) civil servant has given evidence to a Commons committee backing up his claims.

    Josie Stewart, who has worked for the FCDO since 2015 including for the British Embassy in Kabul, said she expected she would lose her job for the revelations.

    Stewart, a senior staff member, volunteered on the Afghanistan response and worked on the special cases team where those potentially eligible to come to the UK were assessed on an individual basis.

    She said:

    It was widespread ‘knowledge’ in the FCDO crisis centre that the decision on Nowzad’s Afghan staff came from the Prime Minister.

    Stewart told the Foreign Affairs Committee she:

    saw messages to this effect on Microsoft Teams, I heard it discussed in the crisis centre including by senior civil servants, and I was copied on numerous emails which clearly suggested this.

    Caught

    She said no one challenged this, including Nigel Casey, the Prime Minister’s special representative for Afghanistan.

    Casey has claimed that after checking his emails he “could not find any that referred to any prime ministerial intervention on the subject of Nowzad”.

    But Stewart said that “yet when I searched my emails for ‘PM’ and ‘Nowzad’ I found more than one email referencing ‘the PM’s decision on Nowzad’ and with Nigel Casey in copy”.

    Johnson and ministers have repeatedly denied that the PM had any involvement in the evacuation of the Nowzad animals from Kabul.

    Stewart, however, said civil servants had “intentionally lied” to the Commons committee. Stewart continued:

    It is possible, although it would be surprising, that neither (Foreign Office permanent under-secretary) Philip Barton nor Nigel Casey remembered seeing the emails about supposed PM involvement on the day they were sent.

    Stewart made it clear:

    I cannot see how it is possible that they would not have found the extensive evidence of this when asked about it later.

    She said in order to make his claim Casey must have either deleted his emails against instructions, did not know how to use the search function in email client Outlook, “found the emails but somehow concluded they were not relevant”, or “he was lying”.

    Lobbying

    Stewart also hit out at other aspects of the response to the Afghanistan crisis.

    She said the sheer amount of lobbying done by MPs on behalf of cases that had been highlighted to them meant

    that most of the focus of the special cases team was on tracking down correspondence or data on individuals with connections, when it could otherwise have been spent identifying and ensuring we helped the most vulnerable people.

    She said:

    We were all desperately trying to help people we knew. Doubtless I would have done the same, had I been in a position of political influence. But the cost and implications of this should not be overlooked.

    She also said there was confusion on who fit into which category for prioritisation, the rota was not fit for purpose with staff taking scheduling into their own hands.

    Stewart said there was “no central process or system for handling correspondence” with six inboxes she was aware of being used:

    The very existence of some mailboxes was forgotten about entirely between shifts.

    The whistleblower said the “only urgency” she saw applied to managing correspondence was when then Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab pledged that all MPs would receive an answer to their cases by September 6:

    This was purely in order to enable the Foreign Secretary to say that all emails from MPs had been read, and to issue a generic response.

    Culture

    Stewart said she did not believe that anything was done with any of the information in the emails at that time.

    She said that in the FCDO’s priorities it

    did not seem to be considered important to respond to individuals in distress, even just to acknowledge their situation.

    She added that when she was able to respond to a handful of emails, she was met with

    replies brimming with gratitude, for the simple fact that someone noticed, and responded.

    She said she came to believe that the evacuation was not a humanitarian response but

    was to protect the UK from reputational damage and to manage domestic political fallout.

    Stewart also spoke about the culture in the FCDO, as she said:

    they know there is no space for speaking up, and no prospect of being able to make things any better even if they do.

    She said the death of FCDO diplomat Richard Morris, who took his own life in August 2020 with the coroner concluding that work stress was at least in part a factor, was:

    tragically resonant in terms of the sense of appalling responsibility within a broken system.

    By The Canary

  • A British-US national detained by Iran has gone on hunger strike, his sister has said.

    Wildlife conservationist Morad Tahbaz, 66, who also holds Iranian citizenship, was taken back into custody after originally being allowed out on furlough on the same day last week that charity worker Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe and retired civil engineer Anoosheh Ashoori were released and then allowed to return to Britain.

    Back to prison

    His sister, Tahrane Tahbaz, told Today on BBC Radio 4 that he was taken back into prison after just 48 hours:

    He was taken back to prison after 48 hours. He wasn’t really on furlough. It seemed more like a visit than a furlough.

    He didn’t have an ankle bracelet put on him. He was with security and, after 48 hours, he was taken back under security – back to the prison.

    Tahbaz continued:

    We haven’t heard from him since and we have heard through a relative just a few hours ago that he’s been taken from the prison and he’s been taken to an undisclosed location and that he’s gone on hunger strike.

    Tahbaz’s sister said that their family were led to believe that he would be part of the same release deal as Zaghari-Ratcliffe and Ashoori:

    Frankly, for four years we were led to believe that he would be part of the deal when it was made,” she said.

    And that’s what we were told. And the deal was made, the money was paid and he wasn’t part of the deal – and he’s still there – and we’re very worried.

    Abandoned

    Last week, the UK said it secured Tahbaz’s furlough, along with the release and return of the two other dual nationals.

    This came after the Government finally agreed to settle a £400 million debt to Iran dating back to the rule of the Shah in the 1970s.

    However, just two days later Tahbaz was forced to return to Evin Prison.

    The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office told the PA news agency on Monday that Morad has now been moved from the prison to a residential location in Tehran.

    A FCDO spokesperson said:

    Morad has now been moved from Evin prison to a residential location in Tehran.

    We have been in touch with Morad’s family throughout the day and continue to lobby the Iranian authorities at the highest levels to allow him to return home immediately, as the Iranian government committed to doing.

    Tahbaz, who has cancer, was arrested during a crackdown on environmental activists in January 2018.

    He is a prominent conservationist and board member of the Persian Wildlife Heritage Foundation, which seeks to protect endangered species.

    Tahbaz was sentenced to 10 years in prison with his colleagues on vague charges of spying for the US and undermining Iran’s security.

    His sister said that the family feels “abandoned”.

    We feel very abandoned. His condition remains dire, and we just don’t know how long this is going to take.

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • Coronavirus (Covid-19) cases are on the rise again. But there’s been no daily PR briefings with the latest statistics from Downing Street for weeks. And it’s sadly the case that there were plenty of warnings from scientists and others that this rise was on the cards.

    Cases soaring

    The latest (March 18) Office of National Statistics (ONS) figures state that for England:

    the percentage of people testing positive for coronavirus (COVID-19) continued to increase in the week ending 12 March 2022; we estimate that 2,653,200 people in England had COVID-19 (95% credible interval: 2,571,500 to 2,739,700), equating to 4.87% of the population or around 1 in 20 people.

    The ONS also reported increases for the other three nations.

    According to the government, deaths as a result of Covid are down generally, with 814 listed for week-ending 4 March.

    BA.2 now dominant variant

    The ONS report adds that:

    for the week ending 13 March 2022… the Omicron BA.2 variant is now the most common variant in England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland.

    The following graphs for the period 30 January to 12 March appear to back this up:

    An article in the Independent stated that the sub-variant BA.2 is believed to be the cause for around 57% of current cases in England.

    And UK Health Security Agency chief executive Dr Jenny Harries warned:

    the increasing presence of the BA.2 sub-lineage of Omicron and the recent slight increase in infections in those over 55 show that the pandemic is not over and that we can expect to see Covid circulating at high levels. (Our emphasis)

    So why are cases rising?

    Southampton University’s associate professor in public health Dr Nisreen Alwan reckons she has the answer as to why cases are rising:

    Further, in January the British Medical Association made it clear that by lifting protective measures, the UK government has placed “the public at greater risk”:

    That same month professor of operational research and Independent SAGE member Christina Pagel accused Boris Johnson of having “zero interest in protecting others from getting sick, needing hospital or dying”:

    Johnson was also keen to placate backbench Conservative MPs who wanted to drop coronavirus protections and open up the economy, regardless of the consequences for everyone’s health.

    Overall, according to the Independent, scientists believe that the rise in coronavirus cases could be down to:

    waning of protection provided by boosters, the emergence of the highly infectious Omicron sub-variant, known as BA.2, increased social mixing between the young and old, a reduction in mask-wearing and testing, and the removal of self-isolation requirements.

    Infection-surveillance data tools de-funded

    Meanwhile, the government has cancelled funding for the study known as React-1 (Real-time Assessment of Community Transmission). React-1 provides “precise snapshots of how many people are infected and which areas are worst affected”, according to the Guardian.

    Funding for the ZOE app is also going. The Guardian notes that ZOE “tracks people’s symptoms and has cost £5m over the past two years”. The app was launched “by health science company ZOE with scientific analysis provided by King’s College London.” It’s the largest ongoing study of coronavirus.

    It’s reported that other coronavirus surveillance tools are ending too.

    Early warnings

    On 22 January, The Canary reported on Boris Johnson’s decision to end ‘Plan B’ protection measures for England. Those measures included compulsory face coverings in many indoor venues, working from home if possible, and coronavirus passes for certain settings.

    Scientists opposed government changes to protections.

    On 27 February, The Canary published an article warning of Omicron variant BA.2 and how it was on the rise. We noted that despite that trend:

    as of 24 February there’s no longer a legal requirement to isolate for anyone who tests positive for the virus. And from 1 April, free universal symptomatic and asymptomatic testing for the general public in England will end.

    We added that those and other changes introduced by the UK government “could potentially exacerbate the spread of the stealth [BA.2] variant and bring about a new wave of cases”.

    At the time, Independent Sage condemned the ending of free tests and payments in support of self-isolation. It listed 11 points as to why that move was unacceptable.

    Additionally, a number of scientists signed a letter to England’s chief scientific advisor Patrick Vallance and chief medical officer Chris Whitty. It stated that ending protections would almost certainly “increase the circulation of the virus and remove the visibility of emerging variants of concern”.

    Other factors

    Pagel provides more clues regarding the current state of the pandemic and the possible causes for the rising number of cases:

    She noted, too, that waning vaccine protection is a factor, and that outbreaks in care homes are also rising:

    Indeed, in a 18 March article by University College London it’s concluded

    vaccination-acquired immunity against COVID-19 wanes substantially after three months among elderly care home residents, suggesting that regular booster jabs may be needed for this group.

    Suppressing the truth

    Professor Alice Roberts, another member of Independent SAGE, argues that coronavirus information is being suppressed, with ZOE figures vastly different to those published by the government:

    But from the absence of daily, or even weekly, briefings from the Johnson government, you may be forgiven for thinking the pandemic is over and all is well. But it’s apparent that’s far from true.

    Indeed there’s the matter of ‘Long Covid‘. An example of that is the focus of a report in Nature, published online on 7 March ahead of print. It’s claimed that clinical studies provide strong evidence of brain-related abnormalities resulting from the virus.

    Undoubtedly, politics and ‘herd immunity’ by stealth are behind this ‘suppression’ of information, which potentially affects all of us – and not just in the short-term.

    Featured image via Wikimedia Commons licensed under the United Kingdom Open Government Licence v3.0 cropped 770×403 pixels

    By Tom Coburg

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • New crew on P&O ships will be paid at rates well below the minimum wage, a union has claimed amid continued anger over the sacking of 800 workers by the ferry giant.

    The Rail, Maritime and Transport union (RMT) said it had discovered another “shocking twist” to the scandal because replacement crews on P&O ships will be on “poverty pay”.

    More protests to come

    More demonstrations will be held in the next few days, with growing pressure on the company to reverse its decision and the Government to take action.

    The RMT said P&O ships on the Liverpool-Dublin route have now been crewed with Filipino ratings on contracts which pay below the minimum wage.

    Shipping companies which are registered in other countries and operating routes from UK ports to Europe can pay below the minimum wage because they are exempt from legislation.

    RMT general secretary Mick Lynch said:

    The weakness in UK employment law has not only allowed the mass dismissing of UK seafarers it has also incentivised this barbaric behaviour because employers know there may be no effective sanction to stop them doing so, and on top of that they can get away with paying below the minimum wage.

    Lynch further explained:

    P&O may pay more than the minimum wage at first to agency staff but they will eventually move to rates below this simply because there is nothing to stop them from doing so.

    We fear poverty pay will be accompanied by seafarers being chained to 12-hour day, seven-day week contracts that operate continuously for six months, with no pension.

    Employment legislation

    The union has called for a boycott of P&O services and is urging the Government to look at legal options to reinstate the sacked workers.

    Lynch added:

    We need new employment legislation to protect UK seafarers. The reason P&O have not been able to sack seafarers on Dutch and French contracts is because they have far stronger national employment laws.

    A demonstration will be held outside Parliament on Monday and at the P&O ferry terminal in Cairnryan, southern Scotland, on Wednesday.

    “Unconscionable”

    A spokesperson for P&O Ferries said:

    We know that for our staff this redundancy came without warning or prior consultation, and we fully understand that this has caused distress for them and their families.

    We took this difficult decision as a last resort and only after full consideration of all other options, but, ultimately, we concluded that the business wouldn’t survive without fundamentally changed crewing arrangements, which in turn would inevitably result in redundancies.

    TUC general secretary Frances O’Grady said:

    There was no attempt to challenge P&O on these unconscionable tactics or even question whether these actions were legal.

    O’Grady continued:

    Ministers, from the Prime Minister down, have serious questions to answer.

    This a national scandal. It has to be a catalyst for change on workers’ rights.

    It’s time for the Government to urgently bring forward an employment Bill to stop workers from being treated like disposable labour and make sure what happened at P&O never happens again.

    P&O has acted appallingly. The company must immediate reinstate all sacked staff with no loss of pay.

    P&O Ferries protest
    Protests have already been staged at P&O offices and ports, with more planned (PA)

    By The Canary

  • The sharp increase in energy bills is now just weeks away. On 1 April, prices will go up by 54% – potentially sparking chaos for many people. So, a grassroots campaign group is calling on everyone to take direct action against the energy companies by joining the #BigPowerOff.

    Disabled People Against Cuts (DPAC) is a grassroots disability rights campaign group. It’s been prominent for over a decade. Now, its Sheffield branch is asking people across the UK to join the #BigPowerOff on 1 April 2022.

    The #BigPowerOff

    DPAC Sheffield are asking people not to use mains powered things. For example, it said in a press release people can:

    • Turn the heating down.
    • Use a slow cooker to prepare hot food rather than an oven.
    • Skip having a bath or shower.
    • Not use the washing machine.
    • Not use equipment that emits heat, eg. hair straighteners, hair dryers.
    • Eat cold foods or pre-prepared meals that you can heat.
    • Stop watching TV.
    • Not switch lights on.
    • Turn off non-essential electrical items at the plug.
    • Just drink cold drinks.

    It would be wrong not to mention that there are probably countless households already having to do lots of these things. Because for many, the cost of living crisis is already biting. But DPAC Sheffield want those that may not be currently struggling to take a stand for those that are.

    David Hayes of DPAC Sheffield said:

    You don’t even have to go outside. You can protest from home. We want to show power suppliers that we the people have the potential power to turn off the profits that make them and their shareholders obscenely wealthy whilst millions of people across the UK can’t even afford to cook our teas.

    Rachael will join the #BigPowerOff:

    Other action you can take

    The group is, however, aware these actions may not be possible for some people. DPAC’s Jennifer Jones said:

    We acknowledge that some people have no option at the moment to eat cold foods… many people absolutely must keep their heating and various equipment on in their homes due to disabilities, and in no way should anyone be made to feel shamed into doing this or that they’re not doing their part if they can’t commit to using less or no gas or electricity. 

    So, for people who cannot stop using energy, DPAC Sheffield want you to post selfies displaying the campaign slogan, and make #BigPowerOff banners using up-cycled materials where possible. Also, on social media the group wants people post their stories:

    • Will the rises cause you to go without other essentials?
    • For what reasons are a warm home and food important to you and your family?
    • How much are your own bills increasing by?
    • Are you even in a position to be able to afford to pay the predicted bills…?

    Make energy suppliers listen

    DPAC Sheffield is also aware that some people want to take further direct action by refusing to pay their bills. But as it explains in this video, for people reliant on social security, this is not possible:

    David Hayes of DPAC Sheffield said:

    With the rise in living costs millions of people now face the choice between living or dying in order to feed the insatiable greed of the ruling class. We won’t get anything done waiting for politicians, ‘celebrities’ or unions to fight back

    Energy suppliers are set to put prices up again in October. So, DPAC Sheffield say that #BigPowerOff on 1 April will be the first of many rolling household protests.

    Featured image via DPAC Sheffield 

    By Steve Topple

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • Back in early 2020, we saw new coronavirus (Covid-19) laws being hastily passed through parliament which gave the police sweeping new powers to arrest and fine people. Hundreds of ever-changing lockdown laws were put in place over two years.

    Now, in 2022, activists are still finding themselves in court, and judges are finding them guilty for breaching coronavirus regulations while attending protests when restrictions were in place. But are these convictions even legal? And, importantly, can they be overturned?

    A ludicrous conviction

    Recently, one activist was found guilty for breaching coronavirus legislation after he attended a Kill The Bill gathering in Bristol on 23 March 2021. That evening, around 200 police used some of the most disgusting physical violence I have ever seen in the UK, surrounding the gathering on all sides, assaulting people, and setting their dogs on protesters. The police used coronavirus regulations as an excuse to justify their brutality.

    The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) argued that the police had the right to restrict articles 10 and 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights – freedom of expression and freedom of assembly – in the interest of public health and safety. But as the defendant pointed out in court, a parliamentary inquiry into demonstrations in both London and Bristol at that time highlighted “significant failings” by the police forces: that the Metropolitan police’s actions were “unlawful and breached fundamental rights”, and that Avon and Somerset police hadn’t “properly considered or understood the Article 10 and 11 rights”.

    Despite pointing this out, the defendant was found guilty of not leaving the scene under coronavirus regulations, despite having heard no warning by the police to do so.

    This conviction is ludicrous when we take a look at the numerous cases where it has been found that police have not been acting lawfully when it comes to enforcing coronavirus regulations.

    Take the court case of Jasmine York, for example. She was sentenced to prison on a ridiculous arson charge following another Kill The Bill demonstration in Bristol in March 2021. During her trial, the CPS showed footage of the policing that day. The footage showed police officers telling protesters that their attendance was illegal under coronavirus legislation. Yet during York’s trial, the CPS admitted that the police were wrong to do this. In fact, it agreed that protest was not specifically banned, and that Avon and Somerset police were “wrong in their assumption that any protest was illegal”.

    Kevin Blowe, campaigns coordinator for the Network for Police Monitoring, argues that coronavirus regulations were “an absolute gift to police across the country”. He told The Canary that the rules

    gave senior officers the discretion and the powers to disrupt and shut down protests, regardless of whether there was any genuine risk to public health and with no consideration of human rights obligations.

    Also in 2021, Avon and Somerset police were forced to issue an apology to four Bristol protesters who had been fined for demonstrating outside court in January of that year. It admitted:

    We now accept we misinterpreted the regulations and that the arrests and the issuing of fixed penalty notices were unlawful.

    And in September 2021, the CPS dropped charges against Black Lives Matter activist Bianca Ali, after alleging that she organised a protest in breach of coronavirus regulations. Ali had been given fixed penalty notices, but she refused to pay and was being taken to court. At the time, Ali’s solicitor Patrick Ormerod said:

    The case appears to be another example of a misunderstanding of the interaction between Coronavirus regulations and the Human Rights Act 1998, and another example – like Clapham Common – of the over-policing of protest relating to the conduct of the police.

    Police in London and Bristol acted unlawfully

    On 12 March, a judicial review condemned the Metropolitan Police for breaching protesters’ rights in 2021. The Met had told organisers of a Reclaim These Streets vigil that their protest would be “unlawful” under coronavirus laws. But a judge found that the Met:

    infringed the claimants’ rights to freedom of expression and freedom of assembly under Articles 10 and 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

    The judge said:

    None of the Met’s decisions was in accordance with the law

    In response, Reclaim These Streets said:

    The decisions and actions by the Met Police in the run-up to the planned vigil for Sarah Everard last year were unlawful, and the judgment sets a powerful precedent for protest rights.

    Blowe told The Canary:

    The primary weapon [that the police used] was the use of fines on organisers and participants, either imposed or threatened. The recent High Court judgment on the policing of the Clapham Common vigils in March 2021 said this was enforced unlawfully. In the case of fines for protesting in Bristol later the same month, our view is that Avon & Somerset Police was motivated less by concern about the spread of Covid and more by the vindictive belief that Kill The Bill protests were illegitimate and needed crushing.

    It’s time to drop all other coronavirus cases

    The Reclaim These Streets judgment gives good grounds for appeal for activists who have received convictions for breaching coronavirus laws. And other coronavirus-related protest cases outstanding should be dropped on the back of it.

    Meanwhile, the UK Covid-19 Inquiry has been set up to examine the state’s response to the pandemic.

    Blowe said:

    The forthcoming Covid Public Inquiry needs to consider the reversal of all coronavirus fines.

    It’s telling that while protesters are still being hauled into court, the police showed great reluctance in investigating Tory politicians for the 16 parties they held during the pandemic, 12 of which are now subject to criminal investigation. It is also telling that it is still unclear whether the public will ever know the result of this investigation.

    The way that police forces all over the country have handled the policing of protests throughout the pandemic is especially worrying, given that they will get sweeping new powers when the police bill becomes law. Across the country they have got away with using brute force and physically assaulting citizens in the name of coronavirus regulations.

    Blowe pointed out:

    we cannot allow the police to make up the rules about how protests are policed and then pretend they respect the right to demonstrate. With new, poorly-defined anti-protest legislation imminent, this kind of sweeping discretion is a danger to our human rights.

    As protesters, it’s down to us – and any sympathetic lawyers – to make sure that we hold the police to account. We must appeal any fixed penalty notices we received while protesting during the pandemic, and we must definitely appeal convictions we were given by the courts.

    Featured image via Shoal Collective

    By Eliza Egret

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • Content warning: this article contains material some readers may find distressing

    On 14 March, the City of London & Hackney Safeguarding Children Partnership published its Local Child Safeguarding Practice Review. The review details two Metropolitan Police officers’ strip search of a Black schoolgirl – known as Child Q – at her Hackney secondary school in 2020.

    The review condemns officers’ degrading treatment of the child throughout the search, which they conducted on school grounds without supervision by an appropriate adult. This horrific case of state violence against a schoolchild shows that we must take urgent action to get police out of schools.

    A series of safeguarding failures

    According to the review, teachers referred the 15-year-old Child Q to police, alleging that she smelled of weed.

    Teachers – who are responsible for safeguarding pupils – left the child alone with police officers. They allowed police to conduct the search without supervision, and they failed to call the pupil’s mother.

    In Child Q’s words:

    Someone walked into the school, where I was supposed to feel safe, took me away from the people who were supposed to protect me and stripped me naked, while on my period.

    The review explains that police stripped the child and forced her to expose her “intimate body parts”. They made the child – who was on her period at the time – remove her sanitary pad. 

    Child Q’s mother told the review that officers made the child “bend over [and] spread her legs… whilst coughing”. On concluding the degrading search, police refused to let the child use the toilet before returning to an exam. Officers didn’t find any drugs on the child.

    Reflecting on the trauma caused by the incident, Child Q said:

    I don’t know if I’m going to feel normal again… But I do know this can’t happen to anyone, ever again.

    “Undignified, humiliating and degrading”

    The review concludes “that Child Q should never have been strip searched”. Highlighting the integral role that racism played in the dehumanising search, it states “that had child Q not been Black, then her experiences are unlikely to have been the same”.

    In a letter to the review, the child’s aunt said:

    I cannot express to you how aggrieved I am with the school and the police enforcement officers for exposing Child Q to such an undignified, humiliating, and degrading exposure.

    The review notes the role that “adultification bias” played in teachers’ and officers’ mistreatment of Child Q. Adultification is “where adults perceive Black children as being older than they are”. This bias is a product of racist stereotypes which are used to justify the exploitation, abuse, and criminalisation of Black children. 

    Expressing ‘heartbreak’ for the child and her mistreatment, grassroots coalition No More Exclusions co-founder Zahra Bei told The Canary:

    It’s appalling but it’s not surprising that the school dealt with this child and the situation as a criminal matter as opposed to a safeguarding matter. As it says in the report, she was seen as the risk instead of being at risk. And that is what fundamentally needs to change for Black children. Their childhood, their vulnerability, their needs, their humanity has to be recognised in its fullness.

    Not an isolated incident

    Child Q’s dehumanising experience is an extreme example of the routine humiliation, harassment, and targeting that marginalised children and young people experience at the hands of police in their schools and communities. According to the review, police strip searched 25 other children in Hackney over 2020/21. Most of these were drug-related searches. Police found nothing on 22 of these children.

    This reflects the Met’s increasing use of the degrading practice, including against children. As The Canary reported in February, a Freedom of Information request submitted by criminology researcher Tom Kemp found that: 

    the force carried out over 9,000 strip-searches on children in the last five years, including more than 2,000 under-16s.

    Data shows that Met police disproportionately use section 60 stop and search powers against children – particularly those from Black and racially minoritised backgrounds – despite overwhelming evidence that the practice does not prevent crime. 

    Reflecting the state’s tendency to enact violence against marginalised young people, police disproportionately use tasers and spit-hoods against Black and racially minoritised children –  some as young as 10-years-old.

    This violence is reinforced by discriminatory surveillance and policing programmes, such as the Islamophobic Prevent strategy and the racist gangs matrix. There are also racialised civil doctrines and orders that surveil and criminalise young people, like joint enterprise and Knife Crime Prevention Orders.

    An institutionally racist education system

    After decades of reform in education and policing, little has changed. In many cases, reform serves to mask or legitimise harmful practices.

    Today, schools systematically push Black pupils out of mainstream education and into pupil referral units, alternative provision, and – ultimately – prisons. Educators enact this through ‘zero tolerance’ policies which punish Black and minoritised pupils for wearing colourful hijabs or natural afro hair.

    Schools disproportionately and excessively exclude pupils for ‘persistent disruptive behaviour‘. This vague, subjective description could include anything from ‘kissing teeth’ to answering back.

    Factors such as a culture of low expectations and an ahistorical, Eurocentric curriculum also serve to ensure that schools alienate marginalised learners.

    This draconian and discriminatory school environment feeds the UK’s ‘school-to-prison’ pipeline. As a result, young Black and racially minoritised people now make up more than half of children in prison in England and Wales today.

    No police in schools

    It’s in this context that the No Police In Schools campaign – led by grassroots groups Kids of Colour and the Northern Police Monitoring Project (NPMP) – raised local community concerns over the increasing presence of police in Manchester schools in 2020.

    Speaking to The Canary in 2021, NMPM and No Police in Schools member Dr Laura Connelly said:

    Our own community consultation of over 500 people in Greater Manchester shows that SBPOs [school-based police officers] have a range of negative consequences that are felt most acutely by those from working-class and Black and ethnic minority communities.

    She added:

    We are deeply concerned that police will bring into the school setting the institutional racism and police violence already experienced in over-policed communities.

    More police and more police powers 

    Despite the evidence that police do not create safety in our schools and communities, the state seeks to expand the institution’s reach and powers.

    The government’s response to the controversial Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities includes pledges to further increase police contact with schoolchildren. The response – published just two days after the Child Q review – states:

    To help build trust within communities, it is important that the police engage with young people at an early age.

    This initiative includes the introduction of ‘Mini Police’, a framework in which officers would engage with primary school children to teach them about “personal safety”. Police officers’ abuse of Child Q demonstrates just how dangerous this could be.

    The government is also planning to increase police powers through its draconian Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill. The state’s active encouragement of the UK’s school-to-prison pipeline is perhaps best exemplified by its introduction of ‘secure schools’, as set out in the bill.

    Meanwhile, council tax bills across the country are increasing in order to fund more police.

    Invest in communities, not criminalisation

    Child Q’s experience of state violence in school demonstrates the harm that carceral and punitive measures inflict on the most vulnerable in society.

    As the No Police In Schools campaign has highlighted, marginalised young people and communities need investment, not policing.

    We are in the midst of a cost of living crisis and a global pandemic – both following years of austerity. This calls for urgent investment in essential services such as healthcare and affordable housing.

    Successive governments cut funding for youth services by 73% in the decade up to 2020. Rather than police expansion, we should be seeing resources directed towards infrastructures of care like youth workers, community centres, and schools.

    Join the fight to get police out of schools

    Parents, educators, young people, and community members must channel our collective rage to resist police violence and racism in our schools and communities. The horrific assault of Child Q underscores the urgency of this undertaking.

    In order to build a sustained movement, it’s essential that we support grassroots groups fighting for racial justice. These include Hackney Account, Kids of Colour, No More Exclusions, Tribe Named Athari, and the 4Front Project.

    Meanwhile, Sisters Uncut is urging members of the public to “withdraw consent from policing” and support local copwatching efforts.

    Police monitoring groups based in London include Hackney Copwatch, Newham Monitoring Project, and the London Campaign Against Police and State Violence. NPMP is based in the north. And Bristol Copwatch monitors Avon & Somerset Police activities. The Network for Police Monitoring (Netpol), StopWatch and the Monitoring Group work to hold police forces across the country to account.

    The state and its institutions do not – and will not – protect us. This isn’t a case of ‘a few bad apples’. The system can’t be fixed because it isn’t ‘broken’. It deliberately traumatises and criminalises society’s most disadvantaged and marginalised young people by design.

    Now is the time to say no to police in schools and the expansion of police powers. Say no to the degrading practice of strip search – especially against children. And say no to all policies and practices that surveil and criminalise marginalised young people.

    We must demand an end to short-sighted punitive approaches to complex social issues, and work to create a just society that ensures children’s safety, dignity, and freedom from all forms of violence.

    Featured image via Wikimedia/Ilovetheeu cropped to 770×403 

    By Sophia Purdy-Moore

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • Six years after it started, the Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe affair has come to a close. Sort of. Zaghari-Ratcliffe, a dual-citizen of Iran and Britain, was first arrested in April 2016. Since then she has spent periods both in jail and under house arrest accused of espionage by the Iranian authorities. She denied the charges.

    Insiders have long claimed that Zaghari-Ratcliffe’s imprisonment was less about espionage and more about debt. Specifically a long-running row between the British and Iranian governments about an arms deal for British tanks dating back to the 70s.

    Richard Ratcliffe, Zaghari-Ratcliffe’s husband, fought a long public campaign for her release. On 16 March 2022 she was finally released and flown home alongside another released prisoner, Anoosheh Ashoori.

    The current foreign secretary Liz Truss was on hand for a photo opportunity. Perhaps tellingly, the image was tweeted from her account at 2.16am. Hardly ‘Prime Time’ – but then the Tories have a lot to hide when it comes to this case:

    Foreign Office

    It’s not clear if the Ratcliffe’s will meet the prime minister Boris Johnson too. Any such gathering would likely be emotionally charged. The Tories – and the Foreign Office in particular – have good reason to avoid too much scrutiny. It was, after all, during the prime minister’s stint as foreign secretary that Johnson made Zaghari-Ratcliffe’s situation much worse.

    In 2017, Johnson made comments that Zaghari-Ratcliffe had been in Tehran training journalists. A suggestion which the Iranians claimed supported their view that she was a spy.

    It was suggested, including by her husband, that Johnson’s comments directly compounded her predicament. During his hunger strike outside the Foreign Office in 2021, Richard Ratcliffe told the press that Johnson’s words were used by Iran to propagandise against his jailed wife.

    Debt

    Context matters here. The images of the Ratcliffe’s reunited are heartwarming. But there have to be questions about timing. For one thing, it appears the UK has finally paid its debt to Iran. The Guardian reports that £394m was paid on Monday

    The debt related to a £650m order for Chieftain tanks and support vehicles by the Shah of Iran ahead of the 1979 revolution. These were never delivered. According to the Commons Library the UK recognised the debt was owed:

    The UK Government accepts liability for an estimated £400 million debt owed to Iran. The debt is for undelivered armoured vehicles and tanks, originally ordered by the Shah but cancelled by the UK in response to his overthrow in the Iranian revolution of 1979.

    But, they rejected the claim that the detention of Zaghari-Ratcliffe was linked to the deal:

    However, the Government argues this is a separate issue to the detention of British-Iranian dual nationals and also rejects any link between detainees and the nuclear talks.

    Now it seems that the UK has accepted that without payment, its highest profile detainees were going nowhere.

    A danger to us all

    Richard Ratcliffe himself wrote last year that Britain’s highly unaccountable arms trade is a danger to all citizens. He told Declassified UK in May 2021 that:

    the money withheld by the British government is the reason Nazanin has been detained in Iran since her arrest in 2016 while on a family holiday with our then 22-month old daughter, Gabriella.

    He claims the Iranian authorities themselves said so:

    A few weeks after she was arrested, Nazanin was told by her interrogators from the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) that while there was “nothing in her case”, she was going to be held for leverage with the UK. Gradually they revealed she was being held to recover a debt.

    That someone can be held for leverage in an arms deal that went sour decades ago should concern us all. And the UK’s arms trading is highly indiscriminate. We sell to virtually anyone: be they authoritarian allies like Saudi Arabia and notional enemies like Russia.

    Oil politics

    Yet payment of the debt is only part of the story. And a glance at the headlines will tell you why. Russian oil is going to be less accessible as sanctions pile up following the Putin regime’s invasion of Ukraine. Other sources must be found. It follows that a thaw between the West and Iran is on the cards.

    Certainly, Iranian politicians seem to think so. A statement published by Al Jazeera Wednesday, and signed by 160 parliamentarians, said due to Ukraine, Iran had the upper hand:

    Now that the Ukraine crisis has increased the West’s need for the Iranian energy sector, the US need for reduced oil prices must not be accommodated without considering Iran’s righteous demands.

    The sense seems to be that Iran is now well positioned to push for, and benefit from, refreshed nuclear talks with the US and others.

    Pawns in a game

    It is heartening to see Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe back home with her family. And her story can tell us much about geopolitics today. Hers is an extreme example of how all ours fates turn on the whims of global capital – in this case, the fossil fuel and arms trades – and of a set of blundering ruling class buffoons, for whom we are all just pawns in a game.

    Featured image via screenshot/On Demand News, cropped to 770×403

    By Joe Glenton

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • Content warning: this article contains mentions of eating disorders, disordered behaviours, and other content. It may be triggering to those in recovery or who are currently suffering from an eating disorder. Reader discretion is advised.

    Eating disorder services in the UK are failing the thousands of sufferers seeking treatment. Throughout this four-part series, I will be investigating the reasons why the services are unable to provide the help so many people desperately need

    The NHS is failing people suffering from eating disorders across the UK. But what about treatment options in other countries? Some people, if they are fortunate enough to be able to afford it, even travel overseas to access treatment. In the US, despite the inequalities and issues its privatised system creates, there appear to be greater options and more effective treatment schemes.  Are medical professionals’ approaches to treating conditions like binge eating disorder (BED), bulimia, and anorexia better? If so, what could the UK’s health service learn from its American counterparts?

    This is part three of a four-part series. Part one, which you can read here, explored the state of eating disorder treatments under the NHS with insights from Ann McCann, the head of Eating Disorders Association NI (EDANI). In part two, which you can read here, I spoke with a friend who suffers from anorexia. She candidly and frankly explored her experience of NHS services and how they often fail to help those most in need. In part three, I look at eating disorder treatment in the US. I also speak with the doctor who helped me recover about his treatment methods and lived experiences with disordered eating.

    We could take a leaf out of the US’s books when it comes to treatment

    Over in the US, there is a great deal more success and creativity in terms of treatment offered. There are inpatient programs for bulimia and BED, such as Timberline Knolls in Illinois, where Demi Lovato received treatment for their bulimia. Inpatient programs offer a high level of care. Patients get a structured meal plan, group and individual therapy, psychiatric medication, and nutritional education. There is a set follow-up treatment plan when a patient is discharged. Facilities such as these enable the development of better behaviours and coping mechanisms. The constant access to psychological and medical professionals supports a person’s recovery significantly. With all these factors, inpatient programs are highly successful in helping people recover fully.

    US treatment is certainly better, for those who can afford it, than in the UK. Inpatient treatment for bulimia and BED isn’t an option on the NHS.  Although there are private options for treatment in the UK, few of them are tailored to bulimia and BED. However, even with the greater number of options in the US, accessibility is a very real issue, especially if someone cannot get health insurance.

    Even if someone has health insurance, that doesn’t guarantee it will cover the fees to attend a treatment centre. Although there have been improvements in terms of insurance coverage, barriers still remain. Oftentimes, insurers won’t authorise residential treatment until a person has undergone a medical assessment at the facility. Astonishingly, even if a facility determines that a person will require inpatient care, the insurer can still deny the admission. Although California recently adopted a law requiring insurers to cover all medically necessary mental health services, this isn’t the case across all states. Insurance coverage still remains a huge barrier for people seeking the treatment they desperately need.

    Licensed and approved medication for bulimia and BED is readily prescribed

    Another difference between the UK and the US is the psychiatric medication offered to eating disorder patients. Psychiatrists in the US can prescribe medications tailored specifically for eating disorders, not just general antidepressants. Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate, also known as Vyvanse in the US and Elvanse in the UK, is prescribed for BED treatment. It has been proven to be effective in reducing urges to binge and aiding in recovery. It is the first FDA approved medication to treat moderate to severe BED.

    Whilst many doctors have started prescribing Vyvanse, it doesn’t come without its issues and health risks. As Vyvanse is a type of amphetamine, it is a stimulant and can be addictive. As such, Vyvanse is a Schedule II controlled substance due to its high potential for abuse and dependence. Even with its positive impact in terms of reducing binge eating, it carries serious side effects such as cardiovascular and circulatory complications. Due to this, its use needs to be regularly monitored and it cannot be prescribed as a long term option for people with BED.

    Despite this evidence, the NHS will not prescribe it to anyone with BED. It is only prescribed for ADHD, which it also treats. In addition to more options for psychiatric medications, the psychological treatments on offer are more varied. Options range from holistic approaches to interpersonal psychotherapy. Individuals can more readily find a treatment approach that works for them.

    Unconventional but effective addiction treatments also helps those with an eating disorder

    As I mentioned earlier, there is a huge variety of psychological treatments which can be used for treating eating disorders. One such example comes in the form of Dr. Glenn Livingston, a psychologist based in the US. He has written several self-help books and offers coaching for those suffering from disordered binge eating. He takes an approach used in substance addiction treatment rather than traditional therapy. This is based upon the concept of ‘separating’ the urge to binge from your own conscious thoughts. It was his treatment method that finally helped me to recover. Despite having to pay for my treatment, which I acknowledge I am lucky enough to be able to do so, the benefits and freedom it brought me made it worth it. Unlike other services, his treatment does not require people to have health insurance.

    In an interview with Livingston, he candidly described to me his own personal struggles with binge eating. He noted that for many people with BED or bulimia, shame plays a huge role in the mental stress of having an eating disorder:

    People are really ashamed… take myself. I was going through several different Drive-Thrus a day to make sure nobody knew what I was eating

    How a simple ‘mind trick’ proves to be empowering and effective

    From his own struggles with binge eating, Livingston came across a simple ‘mind trick’. This allowed him to dismiss urges to binge quickly. By creating clear ‘rules’ about what, when, and how much to eat, the urges become easy to spot. Every thought suggesting you break a rule is your lower brain sending a misguided survival impulse. These impulses are urges to eat whilst food is plentiful. His method is simple to enforce and can help people get their bingeing issues under control rapidly.

    Livingston described his method as “a thinking game”. This ‘game’ involves “thinking about your constructive versus destructive thoughts about food in a different way”. Through his book and coaching, he aims to teach people to “rationally disempower a destructive food thought”. By learning “how to relax and switch nervous systems at the moment the impulse is firing”, you can stop acting on urges.

    Although there is an opinion that any restriction of food, even mental restriction, will trigger a binge, Livingston disagrees. He notes that provided the rules a person sets do not deprive them of adequate calories and nutrients, rules can successfully stop bingeing.  By self-regulating what you eat, a person can avoid or limit the number of trigger foods they eat. For some, total avoidance proves to be more freeing than trying to juggle moderating certain foods.

    Tackle urges to binge FIRST, then look at underlying causes

    Livingston also stressed that addressing underlying trauma or past issues of past trauma first can actually hinder a person’s recovery. He suggests tackling the urge to binge first to recover more quickly:

    It takes years to work through those emotional issues. Whereas you could identify the destructive thoughts and disempower them within a couple of months

    Recognising that you do have control over whether you act on urges or not often empowers those who struggle with binge eating. It removes feelings of powerlessness, where bingeing feels ‘automatic’ or that they can’t stop. However,  addressing trauma is also a hugely important step. Therapy for trauma can be massively beneficial for anyone with any kind of mental illness and can greatly improve a person’s quality of life. Livingston stresses that getting the urges to binge under control first frees up more mental space in order to undergo the difficult process of addressing trauma or other co-morbidities. Trauma should never be ignored and, without the stress of bingeing, a person may be more able to cope with the long-term task of going through trauma therapy.

    The food industry has a big role to play in contributing to binge eating issues

    Livingston also mentioned a factor that is often overlooked in regard to binge eating: the role of food companies. They make fast food and processed food highly palatable, due to a combination of sugar, salt, and fat. These foods are nutritionally lacking yet incredibly stimulating. When consumed, people will not feel satisfied by them, leading to overeating in order to try to become satiated. Food companies are highly attuned to how to psychologically and biologically get people to eat their products. Companies use this knowledge to increase sales. The colours used in food packaging, the excessive additives (mostly sugar and salt, the two most addictive), and the cheap price persuades people to buy these products. Livingston described how food companies put hugely varied artificial flavours in processed foods to make people eat more:

    on an evolutionary basis, when you sense variation in flavour… you are probably sensing a variation in micronutrients… So we are hardwired to keep eating when we find something that tastes a little different… The big companies know this.

    This manipulation results in the loss of the ‘hunger and fullness’ meter in people. An upset in the meter causes them to have urges to eat large amounts of these foods to satiate themselves. In an attempt to lose weight, they may over restrict their food intake or begin purging after eating. “A big part of the bingeing problem is the restriction also”, Livingston commented. The ‘feast and famine cycle’ only fuels the fire of an eating disorder.

    The hyper-palatability of food is a serious public health risk

    Even those without a diagnosable eating disorder struggle with overeating due to the hyper-palatability of these foods. Again, Livingston noted that:

    2.8% of the [US population] is diagnosable as a binge eater but 40% of the population is obese… there’s a problem there.

    Considering that 28 % of the UK’s adult population is obese and 36.2% are overweight, it would be foolish to overlook that a huge majority of people have issues regulating their eating due to the strategies food companies use. Boris Johnson’s woeful attempt to tackle the obesity crisis by putting calorie counts on restaurant menus is like sticking a plaster over a bullet wound. Tighter regulation on additives, accessibility to whole foods in deprived areas, and better education on diet are the solutions needed. These preventative measures could save many from developing an issue with overeating or binge eating.

    You can listen to my full interview with Livingston here:

    In part four, I’ll explore my personal reflections on the situation with the NHS, the food industry and our approach in the UK to eating disorders more broadly.

    Featured image via Envato Elements and Sardaukar Blackfang – Wikimedia, under licence CC0 1.0

    By Eileanor Crilly

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • SNP-led Glasgow City Council’s latest move for its poorest residents sets a worrying precedent. It’s planning to restrict how people can spend a coronavirus (Covid-19) payment. And while this is happening on a small scale, it should be denounced now. Because the potential for the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) and the UK government to take this to the extreme is there already.

    Scotland loves… gift cards?

    The Scottish government has allocated £80m to a Covid Economic Recovery Fund. It’s distributing it to all local authorities who then get to choose how to spend it. In Glasgow, the city council is giving low income households a gift card. As it said on its website, the council:

    has been given over £9million by the Scottish Government to allocate Scotland Loves Local gift cards that can only be used in the city by residents from low-income households.

    This funding… means that over 84,500 households in the city will each receive £110 worth of the gift cards to be spent in registered businesses in Glasgow

    The gift cards are part of the Scotland Loves Local scheme to promote people shopping on their high streets and in the local area. But there’s a catch. Because people may not be able to spend the gift cards on just anything, or anywhere.

    As Glasgow Live reported, a Tory amendment to the plans was passed at an SNP-led city council meeting. It noted that:

    Conservative councillors put forward an amendment saying there should be restrictions on the use of the gift cards “to ensure they cannot be used for the purposes of purchasing tobacco.”

    Their amendment also wants officers to look at excluding national chains from the shops participating in the council scheme to boost regional businesses.

    The Conservative politicians also called for the card to be used in person or for delivery from local retailers to encourage footfall to neighbourhood shops.

    The SNP administration accepted these amendments, despite Labour opposition. And there’s several issues with them.

    Restricted access

    Firstly, people can currently only use the gift card in 184 shops in Glasgow with plans to expand this. Of course, this element is by design – as the SNP’s idea for the gift card is to promote local businesses and high streets. But when you look at it in the context of a one-off, almost social security-like payment, this presents problems.

    Considering Glasgow is the UK’s largest retail district outside of London, 184 shops is a tiny number for people to choose from. So, the council is restricting poor people with this payment. If the SNP-led council accepts the Tory plans to exclude national retailers, then it will restrict people even more. 

    Also, the card would need to be accessible for chronically ill and disabled people. So, all shops would need to offer a delivery option. It’s currently unclear if that’s the case.

    But moreover, it sows the seed that authorities can restrict how poor people spend their social security.

    “Paternalism”

    A Labour councillor called the restrictions “paternalism in the extreme” and “a 19th century concept”:

    we can’t trust the poor to spend their own money without putting restrictions on them that they are not allowed to buy a packet of rolling tobacco.

    But the idea of controlling what social security claimants spend their money on isn’t new. As researcher Sue Jones wrote in 2016, the UK government was already looking at digital currency and smart cards for social security claimants. As far back as 2012, Conservative MPs, including Universal Credit architect Iain Duncan Smith, were pushing the idea. The Telegraph reported that he said:

    I am looking… at ways in which we could ensure that money we give [social security claimants] to support their lives is not used to support a certain lifestyle.

    It noted that the “smart cards“:

    would only be able to pay for “priority” items such as food, housing, clothing, education and health care.

    DWP: tracking claimant’s spending

    Jones noted in 2016:

    Lord Freud, one of the main architects of the welfare “reforms” said:

    “Claimants are using an app on their phones through which they are receiving and spending their benefit payments. With their consent, their transactions are being recorded on a distributed ledger to support their financial management.”

    The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has been working with Barclays, Npower, University College London and a UK-based distributed ledger platform startup called GovCoin to create an app which tracks people’s benefit spending.

    In other words, the DWP would track what people spent their social security on. It ran a trial of GovCoin, but the department concluded:

    that it was not viable due to limited take up potential and the expenses it would incur.

    But that could soon change.

    Enter Britcoin

    The current Conservative government and the Bank of England (BoE) are looking at introducing “Britcoin” – a government digital currency. So far, plans are in the early stages. The BoE has said that it would not roll out the crypto currency until at least 2025. And while neither it or the government have mentioned Britcoin in the context of social security, it could eventually become a reality.

    In 2019, the DWP was already discussing using distributer ledger technology (DLT) for social security payments. Blockchain, on which many crypto currencies are based, is one type of DLT. It may well have been looking at this as part of a reconsideration over the failed 2016 trial of GovCoin.

    So, if the BoE was to introduce a government crypto, then this would go some way to limit the DWP’s previous concerns over cost if it wanted to use a version of it – as the roll-out and tech expenses would be met by the BoE and or Treasury. Also, the DWP would likely know what wallet social security claimants would be using. Therefore, within the blockchain it could check on how you spent your payments. It’s important to note that because of the way crypto currently operates, the DWP would probably need to police any system more than it does the current one. This is because claimants would have workarounds to avoid it monitoring their use of their payments – like using a different wallet or converting the crypto to physical currency.

    But overall, the potential implications of governments using crypto can be seen in China.

    Credit-scoring society

    China already has a state crypto called e-CNY. China also has a “social credit score” system, where blockchain technology is used to ‘rate’ people. Both local authorities and private companies use the system. As Business Insider wrote:

    Like private credit scores, a person’s social score can move up and down depending on their behavior.

    The exact methodology is a secret — but examples of infractions include bad driving, smoking in non-smoking zones, buying too many video games, and posting fake news online, specifically about terrorist attacks or airport security.

    Other potential punishable offenses include spending too long playing video games, wasting money on frivolous purchases, and posting on social media. …

    China has already started punishing people by restricting their travel, including banning them from flights.

    Authorities banned people from purchasing flights 17.5 million times by the end of 2018…

    They can also clamp down on luxury options — many are barred from getting business-class train tickets, and some are kept out of the best hotels.

    As writer AnonMcPleb wrote, central bank cryptos (but also all crypto currencies):

    also have inherent surveillance capabilities which, if combined with a Social Credit Score system as implemented in China, can have frightening implications on human rights, freedoms and free speech when combined with AI monitoring and where political detractors can easily have their voices and funds frozen.

    In other words, if the UK government combined Britcoin with the DWP and data gathering, then the civil liberties implications could be disastrous.

    A dystopian, crypto future?

    The Conservative Party has consistently breached the human rights of welfare claimants and created a culture where they’re viewed as scroungers. Currently, under its administration, the UK is descending further into authoritarianism and corporate fascism via legislation – like the so-called police bill. Moreover, the government already forces refugees to accept inhumane social security payments via a pre-paid card along with no choice over accommodation.

    So, it’s no stretch of the imagination to think that the government could in the future use Britcoin to monitor what people spend their social security on – more so given the DWP and its architects wanted to previously. The government could also create what’s known as a “hard fork“. This would be where a part of the Britcoin blockchain would split from the original and effectively create a new crypto. The government could do this to create a separate Britcoin for social security.

    As Jones summed up:

    Are we going to see people claiming social security being named and shamed for buying Mars bars, a bottle of wine or a book? Or birthday and Christmas presents for their children? Will the state be sanctioning people that make purchases which the government deems “unnecessary”?

    It may seem a stretch to think that the SNP restricting a coronavirus benefit could lead to this. But the point is that any step on a path towards the state controlling how people spend social security is a step too far. By placing caveats on its spending, the SNP is giving the green light for this kind of approach to be rolled out further. And that could potentially be utterly dystopian – as if the future of the UK wasn’t looking that way already.

    Featured image via the SNP – YouTube and UK government – Wikimedia 

    By Steve Topple

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • Keir Starmer’s Labour Party is once again in chaos at the local level. As independent outlet SKWAWKBOX has been reporting, grassroots members of Constituency Labour Parties (CLPs) have been quitting – in some areas en masse.

    Starmer: “disgusting”

    Since Starmer took charge of Labour in 2020, there’s been an ongoing purge of left-wing members and groups. For example, back in July 2021, the party banned four left-wing organisations – later going so far as to expel filmmaker Ken Loach for supporting one of them. At the CLP level, the party has either been deselecting people, like veteran councillor John Edwards, or clamping down on whole CLP committees, like it did in Bristol. Often it did this because of motions in support of the exiled Jeremy Corbyn. As Loach told The Canary in an interview in 2021:

    The behaviour of officials – paid officials – has been disgusting: suspending parties for no reason; ruling motions out of order that were perfectly proper motions to discuss, like the role of the leadership. To say that a party member cannot discuss what the leadership is doing is so stupid, bizarre, destructive – that these are not rules you can abide by.

    Thanks to independent news site SKWAWKBOX, we know that more trouble is brewing for Starmer at the local level.

    Newham: an exodus of members

    Firstly, in Newham, there’s been an exodus of CLP members. It’s over the direction Starmer is taking the party, Labour’s Islamophobia problem, and the party’s targeting of Jewish socialists. As SKWAWKBOX wrote:

    a wave of resignations by senior elected officers has hit Newham Labour party as chair after chair of constituency and branch parties have resigned not just their position but their whole membership in disgust at the conduct of of the Keir Starmer-David Evans regime.

    On 16 March, Newham branch disability officer Linda Laurie also quit both her role and the party. SKWAWKBOX noted it was over:

    the party’s bigotry toward disabled people and its failure to protect women, as well as the more general war on local parties and members

    But Newham is not the only area seeing members quitting en masse.

    ‘Betrayals, muzzlings, and expulsions’

    On Friday 11 March, 11 out of 13 members of Berwick-upon-Tweed CLP’s executive committee stood down from their roles. Some quit the party too. As SKWAWKBOX noted, their reasons were many, including that Starmer has:

    • betrayed leadership campaign pledges including the one to unite Labour;
    • suppressed the Forde Report investigating racist, misogynist and Islamophobic behaviour in the Labour Party as described in the “leaked report” from April 2020;
    • removed the whip from Jeremy Corbyn, despite him being a member of the Labour Party…
    • expelled friends to the Party, like Ken Loach, and fantastic member activists across the country, on ludicrous and often retrospective, grounds;
    • muzzled socialist councillors and MPs such that they may not utter a single word of disagreement with the current Leader without being threatened with losing the Labour whip and/or being deselected.

    Far from being a broad church, Labour under Starmer is turning into a right-wing cabal of him and his cronies. The very vocal disquiet at local level shows this, and it’s probably only set to continue.

    Featured image via the Telegraph – YouTube

    By Steve Topple

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • The Trades Union Congress (TUC) was supposed to be protesting at this year’s Tory spring conference, but it ended up redirecting its energy to the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Never fear, though – as local groups in the North West are refusing to let the Tories off the hook that easily.

    The conference is taking place on 18 and 19 March at the Blackpool Winter Gardens.

    The TUC: cancelling a protest

    On 9 March, the TUC said it was cancelling its planned protest on Saturday 19 March. It said in a statement:

    Over the coming fortnight we will be mobilising trade unionists in support of the ITUC day of solidarity with Ukraine on 15 March.

    And we will support the mobilisations in London and around the UK for the UN Antiracism Day on 19-20 March – particularly as this government refuses to welcome enough refugees from Ukraine into the UK.

    The wages and bills crisis is about to bite. The TUC and the whole trade union movement demand action. So we will be bringing our campaign to win pay rises and a new deal for workers to a town or city near you soon and hosting a national mobilisation in London this summer. Dates and details to be announced soon.

    But local groups clearly felt they should still take action.

    Tory spring conference: the demo is on

    So, two days of action are happening anyway. Wendy Fell from Blackpool, Fylde and Wyre Trade Union Council and Unite Community Lancashire said in a statement:

    Within 24 hours we and allies locally… turned round the TUC pulling out. We have got things agreed with the police who will be all over that area of Blackpool. We have got a march route organised and adverts and social media material ready.

    The two days of action will see plenty going on. On 18 March, St Johns Square in Blackpool will see stalls and speakers from 1pm. Then, on 19 March, people will meet at the Comedy Carpet on the sea front near to the Blackpool Tower. They’ll march to the Tory conference at Winter Gardens/St Johns Square. If you can make it in person, be sure to follow the demo on social media:

    The agenda of the protest at the Tory Party spring conference

    Blackpool: get there if you can

    Fell said that the Tories:

    will try and dominate the domestic news agenda with their narrative. While the media and the Conservatives are in Blackpool, we will attempt to get our own ideas across, ideas which include social justice and fairness – unlike theirs.

    The Conservatives haven’t had a conference here since 2007 and it warrants a big turnout to let them know we’re watching. Watching as they trash our NHS, increase food-bank use, give their mates lucrative contracts, fail to deliver on any promises, ignore the refugee crisis, refuse to act on the environment, the cost of living crisis and so much more.

    With the price rises and cost of living crisis, disabled people face the devastating impacts of poverty more fiercely than other demographic. Please do all you can to help us in that crucial task.

    So, if you’re in or near Blackpool on 18 and 19 March, it’s time to show the Tories that people won’t take their toxic governance lying down.

    Featured image via Sky News – YouTube

    By Steve Topple

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • Content warning: this article contains mentions of eating disorders, disordered behaviours, and other content. It may be triggering to those in recovery or who are currently suffering from an eating disorder. Reader discretion is advised.

    Eating disorder services in the UK are failing the thousands of sufferers seeking treatment. Throughout this four-part series, I will be investigating the reasons why the services are unable to provide the help so many people desperately need.

    A lack of resources and funding has left NHS eating disorder services across the UK “floundering”. They abandon sufferers of an eating disorder on months or year-long waiting lists for treatment. The NHS prioritises treatment in terms of physical symptoms, not mental distress. The vast majority of sufferers receive next to no help as they don’t meet the physical requirements for immediate treatment.

    Waiting lists and the focus on physical symptoms aside, my experience and research have revealed many factors contributing to why the services are failing. Often, these factors are over-looked when media outlets report on cases of the NHS eating disorder services failing. Across four articles, I aim to pull back the curtains and reveal all.  Internal factors like the continued use of debunked and ineffective therapies will be examined. Commonly ignored external factors, like the role of ‘big food’ companies and widely accessible hyperpalatable food, will also be considered. Along the way, my voice will be joined by the head of a charity, a renowned psychologist, and a recovering anorexic. Each of them has deep insights into why the NHS is failing.

    To fix a system, you need to know why it’s failing. Only then can you find a solution.

    Eating disorder services are inaccessible to the majority

    Trying to access treatment for a mental health condition after getting a diagnosis is incredibly difficult. It’s well documented that the NHS’s mental health services have hit a crisis point, and its eating disorder services are no exception. Unless you’re a ‘severe case’ (i.e. having a BMI under 15), you’re unlikely to get any attention or help. Those who eventually receive treatment often find it to be inadequate, so many never fully recover from their eating disorder.

    As a recovered bulimic, I can speak from experience that I was one of the unlucky ones. Like many, the NHS placed me on a waiting list for close to six years. Those with bulimia, binge eating disorder (BED), and eating disorder not otherwise specified (EDNOS) are the least likely to get treatment. This is in spite of these disorders being more common than anorexia nervosa.

    Eating disorder services have been “cut off by the knees” by underfunding

    I interviewed Ann McCann, the head of Eating Disorders Association NI (EDANI). She revealed the shocking state of eating disorder services in the north of Ireland, which has the highest level of multiple deprivation in the UK. In her words, funding cuts have left NHS services “cut off by the knees”, and they have been “floundering ever since”. McCann stated that this has resulted in a strict hierarchy in terms of who gets treatment:

    services just don’t have the capacity to see many more patients than those suffering from [severe] anorexia… there’s long waiting times even for the ones with anorexia (…) the ones with bulimia and binge eating disorder in particular just feel abandoned (…) they feel totally forgotten about

    For an eating disorder sufferer, these feelings of abandonment will worsen their mental state. EDANI offers a 24-hour helpline, which receives constant calls from concerned parents, partners, or individuals themselves. The vast majority of those calling for help are those with bulimia who have been unable to access NHS treatment. McCann said:

    for every one patient we would see with anorexia (…) there would be five or six with bulimia so there’s a far greater number of people suffering from bulimia (…) they are badly let down

    She expressed similar views to my own; the eating disorder services in the UK are in desperate need of updating and funding. McCann also emphasized that better education about nutrition and a healthy body image for young people would be hugely beneficial. Additionally, GPs need to develop a greater understanding and awareness of eating disorders. Rather than focusing on BMI criteria, they must recognise the behavioural and mental symptoms.

    You can listen to my full interview with McCann here:

    Physical criteria for a mental illness?

    On the notes of GPs, they still diagnose based on physical symptoms, going against the NICE guidelines for diagnosis protocol. They primarily use factors such as BMI and the loss of menstruation in women. In doing so, they are utterly ignoring the mental turmoil anyone with an eating disorder experiences. With bulimia and BED, individuals rarely become underweight. This means their GP may not recognise their disorder. Due to this, they may not even be diagnosed, let alone receive treatment.

    A healthy or overweight BMI doesn’t mean there isn’t severe mental distress or a risk of serious and fatal physical complications. Cardiac arrest, gastric ruptures, Ketoacidosis, oesophageal cancer and suicide are all common causes of death in eating disorder sufferers. The lack of immediate intervention for someone can result in them succumbing to health complications. If they eventually receive treatment, they may be in an even worse state than when they first got diagnosed. Recovery is a far harder process when an eating disorder is not treated early on.

    ‘One size fits all’ treatment relies on ‘guided self-help’ and 20 sessions of CBT

    According to the NHS website, the treatment for bulimia nervosa and BED is “a guided self-help programme”. It also includes around 20 sessions of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT). Considering the fact that, on average, it takes around four years to recover from bulimia or BED, does 20 sessions cut it? Will they really be able to provide practical coping mechanisms and methods for dealing with urges to binge or purge? How about all the underlying and complex psychological issues which coincide with an eating disorder, such as trauma, body dysmorphia, low self-esteem, or other comorbidities? Although self-help can certainly aid a person’s recovery, psychological treatment and professional guidance must occur first. A person trapped in their disorder cannot rationally begin to tackle their habitual behaviours and thought patterns on their own.

    Moreover, everyone is an individual. What works for one person in addressing a mental illness will not work for another. The NHS method of treating eating disorders is ‘one size fits all’; it doesn’t incorporate personal nuances. The statistics show that less than half the people suffering from an eating disorder will fully recover and that interventions for bulimia and BED fail to save a substantial number of patients.

    An ineffective system

    The NHS already offers bulimia and BED sufferers an ineffective treatment programme. Its anorexia treatment isn’t much better. The NHS’s failings in terms of anorexia treatment in the UK have been brought to the public’s attention multiple times. The tragic death of Averil Hart and the case of Fiona Hollings, who was sent 400 miles from home to get treatment, have shown the system is ineffective.

    Surely it’s high time the NHS was given the funding and experts it needs to create effective treatment plans.

    For the second article in this series, I speak with a friend of mine who suffered from anorexia nervosa and got treatment on the NHS. She reveals that even when she accessed treatment, it wasn’t effective.

    Featured image via Envato Elements 

    By Eileanor Crilly

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • Pressure is mounting on chancellor Rishi Sunak to offer further cost of living support in his upcoming spring statement as official figures revealed the biggest fall in real pay for more than eight years.

    The Office for National Statistics (ONS) revealed that with rising prices taken into account, regular pay fell by 1.6% year-on-year in the three months to January.

    This marked the steepest decline in real pay since the September to November quarter in 2013.

    Cost of living crisis

    It comes as average earnings, excluding bonuses, rose by 3.8% in the latest quarter, up from 3.7% previously, but failed to keep up with rampant price hikes as inflation hit a near 30-year high of 5.5% in January.

    There are fears the strain on household finances will become more acute as experts predict inflation will rise to nearly 9% as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine exacerbates already rocketing inflation.

    The Resolution Foundation recently warned that households in Britain could be facing the sharpest decline in real incomes since the 1970s, predicting a 4% drop for working age people in 2022-23.

    Calls are growing for Sunak to offer more help for cash-strapped families and businesses as energy bills and fuel prices reach record levels.

    Union pressure

    Frances O’Grady, general secretary of the TUC trade union, said:

    Energy bills will rise at least 14 times faster than wages this year.

    Household budgets are already stretched to the brink and can’t take any more.

    The Government must use the spring statement to act.

    We need a plan to get wages rising in all jobs, a boost to Universal Credit, and a windfall tax on oil and gas profits – with the money raised going to energy grants for hard-pressed families.”

    Christina McAnea, general secretary at Unison, added:

    Seeing wage rises well below inflation will be chilling for millions of people already struggling with soaring prices and bills.

    It’s even more troubling for employees keeping public services running who have had little or nothing extra in their wage packets.

    She continued:

    With food, energy and tax bills rising, ministers must find the money to ensure those in the public sector are rewarded fairly and don’t leave for better-paid jobs elsewhere.

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • Kill the Bill protester Jasmine York has been sentenced to prison after putting her body on the line to defend women from police violence.

    She’s one of 82 people who were arrested – most of them for riot – following a demonstration in Bristol against the draconian police bill. York has been sentenced to nine months, half of which will be served in prison. Meanwhile, 14 others have already received prison sentences for taking part in the protest.

    Dubious arson conviction

    A jury found Jasmine guilty of arson. The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) insisted that during the demonstration Jasmine pushed a rubbish bin towards a burning police car, and the bin added fuel to the fire. But Jasmine insisted she was using the bin to try to create a barrier between her and the police. Crucially, there was no evidence whatsoever that the bin in question ever caught fire or fuelled anything. Despite this, she’s going to prison.

    The Bristol Anti-Repression Campaign (BARC) is made up of a number of Kill the Bill defendants and their supporters. It said of the sentencing:

    We’re proud of Jasmine, who tried hard to protect other women from the police and was severely beaten by them herself. We’re glad that she was found unanimously not guilty of riot, and also not guilty of a more serious form of arson [with intent to endanger lives] in her trial last month.

    Protecting women

    The CPS has spent ample resources prosecuting Kill the Bill defendants. It has painted them as an angry “mob” that worked together to beat up police officers and set fire to police vehicles.

    In his sentencing, judge James Patrick stated:

    You were very well aware of damage caused to police equipment which is paid for by the community, for the benefit of the community. Rather than standing by, you played your part by continuing the lawlessness.

    Yet in her week-long trial, the jury saw ample evidence of the police themselves behaving unlawfully. They saw evidence of officers cracking the edges of their shields onto people’s heads, and officers hitting and kicking protesters while on the ground. The jury saw photos of Jasmine’s dark bruises at the hands of the police. Her defence barrister Russell Fraser emphasised that “time and time again” Jasmine put her own body in harm’s way to protect others.

    During her trial, Fraser said:

    The one consistent thing [Jasmine] does is that she comes to the aid of other women. Consider the woman thrown back into the crowd. She moves across the line for that reason. There’s not many of us who would do that sort of thing, you might think.

    jasmine york trial
    Protesters stand outside court in solidarity with Jasmine York. Photo via BARC
    Cracking down on anyone who resists state repression

    The judge summed up his sentencing by saying:

    Your offending played a part in a very serious incident that caused lasting damage to public and private property. I would fail in my duty if I didn’t impose an immediate sentence. You will serve half of the nine months in prison.

    It is, perhaps, unsurprising that our increasingly fascistic state is keen to make an example of the Bristol residents who took part in the demonstration. After all, scenes of the Bristol unrest were broadcast around the world. They drew international attention to both the government’s new laws and to police brutality. The state is desperate to keep its citizens in line and to terrify them into obedience. And the best way to do this is to hand down harsh prison sentences.

    BARC argued:

    We recognise that the legal system is designed to maintain inequality, protect the police, and prevent political dissent. We know that the justice of the courts is a tool the state uses to preserve and defend itself.

    Indeed, Jasmine is just one of fifteen who’ve been made an example of by receiving prison sentences following the Kill the Bill demonstrations. Back in December, the same judge gave Ryan Roberts a massive 14-year sentence.

    BARC said:

    Although we were hoping for a non-custodial sentence [for Jasmine], this wasn’t unexpected – the repression following Kill the Bill protests has been harsh. The police and Judge Patrick are trying to send a message to anyone who takes a stand. Just last week, Mariella was sentenced to 5.5 years in prison.

    Mariella Gedge-Rogers was found guilty of riot after being brutally attacked by police on the same demonstration. She was kneed to the ground by an officer, dragged around by another, and held down by three more. As The Canary reported:

    Mariella is a Woman of Colour. She said that being “kneed to the floor” was especially frightening in the light of the murder of George Floyd, who died of suffocation as a result of Minneapolis Police officer Derek Chauvin kneeling on his neck.

    Armoured thugs

    It’s telling that none of the police officers who were caught on footage attacking people are facing any accountability whatsoever for their brutal actions. They continue to keep their jobs while our friends go to prison.

    Meanwhile, the wider public barely questions whether it’s legitimate that an armoured and trained gang can brutalise communities and beat up protesters. It’s widely accepted – especially among white, middle class communities – that this gang’s use of violence is legitimate, and that it can be trusted to carry arms.

    2022 will see many more Kill The Bill trials, and potentially many more people going to prison. We can expect the state to put a spin on all the trials, depicting the police as a force that was attacked and fearful for officers’ lives. Don’t fall for this rhetoric – the police, the court, and the prison system are all in place to crush our spirit. But as BARC says:

    We wont go quietly and this is not the end. Collective self defence is our greatest weapon!

    Featured image via Eliza Egret

    By Eliza Egret

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • Boris Johnson will be receiving a £2,212 pay rise, Downing Street has confirmed. This will also be given to all MPs in April. Meanwhile, as of April the nation faces a 10.4% hike in National Insurance contributions.  And NHS workers, for whom the prime minister stood and clapped at No 10’s doorstep, face a real terms pay cut.

    Nice job if you can get it

    The increase in MPs’ pay will come in as the nation faces a cost of living crisis, with rising energy bills and a hike in National Insurance. The average reported salary of MPs is around £82k a year. That’s in addition to expenses and second home allowances. Meanwhile, the average salary in nursing is between £14.5k and £30k a year.

    The Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (Ipsa) said the annual adjustment to MPs’ basic pay for 2022/23 will be 2.7%.

    Ipsa said the decision is “in line” with its previous ruling in 2015 to adjust MPs’ pay at the same rate as changes in public sector earnings published by the Office of National Statistics. The adjustment does not appear to be on a scale to account for the already considerable amount of public money being paid to individual MPs.

    How the other half lives

    A spokesperson claimed Johnson has no way of refusing the automatic increase in his pay as MP for Uxbridge and South Ruislip. And he will not cut the amount he gets for his job as prime minister to counteract the rise. To clarify, Johnson earns £79.5k as prime minister in addition to his MP salary of £82k. Meaning he takes home a grand total of £161.5k annually (£163k as of April).

    Johnson’s spokesperson declined to say whether Johnson will donate the increase to charity.

    Asked if he would cut his ministerial salary by £2,200, the spokesperson said:

    The ministerial element of the Prime Minister’s salary has been frozen for some time now and will remain so.

    Johnson claimed in July 2021 that his salary is not enough to live on. Meanwhile, according to one source, while the average salary in London is considerably higher at £39.7k, in the North East region workers earn an average of only £27.5k a year.

    By The Canary

  • Squatters broke into a central London mansion apparently owned by Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska and declared that it should house refugees.

    At least five people were occupying the property in Belgrave Square since early morning on Monday 14 March.

    Bethan Reilly from the Morning Star Online posted updates via Twitter:

    “Refugees welcome”

    The squatters call themselves the London Mahknovists. They’re named after Nestor Makhno, who led an anarchist force that attempted to form a stateless society in Ukraine during the Russian Revolution of 1917-1923.

    The building was cordoned off and surrounded by police officers and vehicles.

    Three men stood on the balcony above the street. They played music, waved and danced next to signs which read “This property has been liberated” and “Putin go f*** yourself”.

    They all wore dark clothes and face coverings. And one of the men told reporters there are five of them inside the mansion, but they have a “way bigger group coming”.

    He added that they broke into the property at around 1am. “We stay here until Putin stops the war,” one man said. He continued:

    We have opened the building to house Ukrainian refugees and refugees from all nations.

    Also, he said the owner of the building “wants to destroy Ukraine homes”, adding:

    He supported the wars. This home belongs to Ukrainian refugees. There are families dying. Their land has gone. This is the least we can do.

    They said the UK government has “failed” to properly respond to the invasion, adding:

    The same money that funds the Russia war machine funds the Conservative Party.

    Talking about finding housing for refugees, one of them said:

    Priti Patel, do not worry. We did your job. Refugees welcome.

    Russian invasion of Ukraine
    The squatters said they had ‘liberated’ the building to house Ukrainian refugees (Jonathan Brady/PA)

    Moreover, the group also criticised the police, comparing them to those arresting protesters in Russia.

    Asked how they got into the property, one joked, “Squatters’ magic”.

    One man said that inside the mansion “there is a lot of rooms. There is so much stuff that a normal human being shouldn’t have”.

    Oleg Deripaska

    Deripaska is an industrialist who has had close links with the British political establishment. And he was targeted with sanctions by the government in the week beginning 7 March.

    He’s been described as “a prominent Russian businessman and pro-Kremlin oligarch”. Moreover, he’s reportedly “closely associated” with both the Russian government and president Vladimir Putin.

    His wealth is estimated to be £2.3bn and he has a multimillion-pound property portfolio in the UK. According to a 2007 High Court judgment, this includes the house at 5 Belgrave Square which the squatters targeted. Records indicate the property hasn’t changed hands since and is owned by an offshore British Virgin Islands company.

    Russian invasion of Ukraine
    Officers from the Metropolitan Police Territorial Support Group watch over the squatters (Jonathan Brady/PA)
    Eviction

    According to Reilly, riot police cracked open the front door and a forklift was used to get protestors off the balcony:

    The squatters, meanwhile, resisted as best they could:

    Met Police response

    A Metropolitan Police statement said:

    Police were called shortly after 01.00 hours on Monday 14 March to a residential property in Belgrave Square, SW1.

    Officers attended and found that a number of people had gained entry and hung banners from upstairs windows.

    Officers remain at the location.

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • Content warning: this article includes an image of dead civilians

    It now appears that the Russian military strategy is to lay siege to many of the towns and cities across Ukraine. This follows the targeted and systematic destruction of those towns and cities. That’s regardless of the lives lost, or the displacement of millions of Ukrainians to neighbouring countries. This is a war of terror and attrition. Its aim is to humiliate the Ukrainian leadership and demand total surrender.

    Meanwhile there’s a report that an ‘international brigade’ of 16,000 Syrian soldiers are to head for Ukraine to support the Russian invaders.

    A ‘second front’?

    The Russian people are being fed a diet of disinformation complemented by the shutdown of social media. However, cyber activists are helping to expose Vladimir Putin’s propaganda war to the Russian people.

    One online facility enables anyone in the world to send an SMS message in Russian to random-generated phone numbers of people in that country. It cannot be thwarted by the Russian authorities, barring total disablement of the mobile phone networks.

    Users can click on the ‘Send’ button in order to send a text. They can then click ‘New Text’ to create a different message. By clicking ‘Copy Text’, text can be copied and pasted in any translation facility to see the meaning of the message before sending.

    The facility has the potential for millions of people, globally, to send messages about what’s happening in Ukraine to millions of Russians. Although as with any such facility, the possibility for misuse exists. Especially since there’s no way of monitoring the actual content of messages sent via the facility to Russian mobile numbers.

    Another online tool that anyone can use is run by Mission Lifeline. This is an organisation that specialises in the search and rescue of refugees. The facility enables anyone to volunteer practical help to refugees, offer accommodation, or donate money.

    Declaration of war

    Meanwhile, hacktivist network Anonymous has declared outright war on Putin and his henchmen. The group referred to “numerous government websites” it has taken offline:

    In another message, Anonymous refers to Russian war crimes and urges Russian people to rise up and overthrow Putin:

    Hacking the censors

    Meanwhile, hacktivists have taken direct action against Russian government targets and state-run media.

    For example, Anonymous claims it hacked the database of Roskomnadzor, a Russian agency that monitors, controls, and censors mass media, leaking 360,000 files.

    Roskomnadzor threatened to block the following Russian news outlets: Ekho Moskvy, InoSMI, New Times, Novaya gazeta, Mediazona, and Dozhd. These outlets were accused of publishing “inaccurate information about the shelling of Ukrainian cities and civilian casualties in Ukraine as a result of the actions of the Russian Army”.

    Roskomnadzor also blocked Facebook. Apparently this was because the social media facility “blocked the official accounts of several Russian state-media outlets, including RIA Novosti and the Defense Ministry’s television channel, Zvezda”.

    More acts of sabotage

    It’s claimed Anonymous also hacked a number of Russian state TV channels. The group then provided to the audiences of those channels footage of what’s happening in Ukraine. The channels include Russia 24, First Channel and Moscow 24 as well as streaming services Wink and Ivi.

    The video in this tweet appears to show examples of footage Anonymous transmitted via the TV channels:

    Further, Anonymous allegedly hacked into the Russian Federal Security Bureau (FSB). This tweeted video appears to show hacked FSB data:

    And there’s also the claim that Anonymous-affiliated hacking group NB65 closed down the control centre of Russian spy agency Roscosmos:

    The next day, Anonymous tweeted that it had closed down the entire Roscosmos website:

    According to the Independent, the hackers claimed to have deleted confidential files regarding the agency’s satellite imaging and Vehicle Monitoring System. The head of Roscosmos has said that any attack on the agency would be regarded as an act of war.

    Anonymous also claims it brought down Belarusian surveillance systems, with over 240 cameras sabotaged:

    Thousands of sites hacked

    According to CyberSecurity Mag, Anonymous has hacked into around 2.5k websites in Russia and Belarus as of one week ago. They included some high profile sites – for example, on:

    February 25, Anonymous breached the Russian Ministry of Defence’s database and posted it online for Ukraine and the world to see.

    In the days after that, posts by the account claimed responsibility for disabling websites belonging to the Russian oil giant Gazprom, the state-controlled Russian news agency RT, and numerous Russian and Belarusian government agencies, including the Kremlin’s official site.

    On February 28, for several minutes, the websites of state news agencies TASS and RIA Novosti, the daily Kommersant, the pro-Kremlin newspaper Izvestia and the magazine Forbes Russia displayed a message calling for an “end” to the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

    On February 26, the websites of the Kremlin, the Duma (the lower house of the Russian parliament), and the Russian Ministry of Defense were decommissioned in an attack also claimed by Anonymous on Twitter.

    The BBC goes dark

    Russia has banned BBC Russia following restrictions on Sputnik and Russia Today in other countries. However, BBC Russia is now utilising the ‘dark web‘, making its Ukrainian and Russian news services available via Tor:

    The BBC’s Russian news service will of course give its own slant on what’s happening. But it can be accessed here from within a Tor browser. (Instructions on how to use Tor from an Android phone are available here, and instructions for an IOS phone can be found here.)

    The BBC has also published a video explaining more about the ‘dark web’. It is used by journalists and whistleblowers, but also for “dangerous, illegal, and unethical” activities.

    More war crimes

    Meanwhile, there are more claims of alleged war crimes, with shelling of buildings in residential areas in cities across Ukraine.

    One of the latest examples, allegedly committed by the Russian military, was an airstrike on a maternity hospital in Mariupol. The attack resulted in at least 17 injuries and three deaths:

    This video purports to show the Russian military firing at a civilian car:

    In a Google translation, Polish activist Michal Koloziejczyk claims that three children, trying to escape with their father from Irpin, were found dead (warning: graphic image):

    Annihilation or revolution

    According to the UK’s Ministry of Defence (MoD), Russia has confirmed its deployment of thermobaric launchers, known also as TOS-1a’s, on Ukraine territory:

    The Canary’s Joe Glenton pointed out that thermobaric bombs are held by the US and have been deployed by the UK, but “redefined” by the latter as an ‘enhanced blast missile’.

    In February, Putin placed Russia’s nuclear forces on a “special regime of combat duty“.  There are fears from UK and US intelligence that Russia could also deploy chemical and biological weapons.

    Knowledge is power

    Christopher Chiwis writes for the ultra-right Atlantic Council. In an opinion piece for the Guardian he offers a terrifying and pessimistic view on the future directions of the war waged by Russia.

    He stated:

    there are really only two paths toward ending the war: one, continued escalation, potentially across the nuclear threshold; the other, a bitter peace imposed on a defeated Ukraine that will be extremely hard for the United States and many European allies to swallow.

    Arguably, both those scenarios could be refined if not dismissed. Not by the Kremlin or NATO, however, but by the Russian people – provided they have access to the facts about what’s really happening in Ukraine.

    But to do that would mean revolution – a real revolution. And not just in Russia.

    Featured image via YouTube/News Shorts

    By Tom Coburg

  • Hundreds of protesters have filled the streets of Westminster with the deafening shriek of rape alarms as part of a demonstration against the Metropolitan Police.

    Feminist campaign group Sisters Uncut led the protests. Activists blocked traffic, released bright blue smoke flares, and chanted “our streets” as they marched from Scotland Yard to Charing Cross police station in central London.

    The march marked just over a year since serving officer Wayne Couzens abducted Sarah Everard. And protesters told the PA news agency that they were demanding “radical change” from a “rotten to the core” Met.

    Sisters Uncut protest
    Protesters from feminist action group Sisters Uncut march from Scotland Yard to Charing Cross police station in central London (James Manning/PA)

    Sisters Uncut said 1,000 rape alarms were activated at the police station, following emotional speeches from protesters.

    ‘Radical change’

    Patsy Stevenson, who was arrested at an impromptu vigil for Everard last year, called for home secretary Priti Patel to resign. Stevenson spoke to the crowd at Charing Cross police station as dozens of officers watched on. She told PA she’s calling for “radical change from the whole of the policing system”.

    When asked how the Met can restore public trust, she said:

    First thing is accountability, holding your hands up and admitting you’ve done something wrong.

    Secondly they need to understand there needs to be radical change from the whole of the policing system.

    At the moment we don’t even need police, and that’s not how it should be.

    Sisters Uncut protest
    People attend the protest organised by Sisters Uncut (James Manning/PA)

    When asked whether she thought new leadership following Met’s commissioner Cressida Dick’s resignation would amount to change, Stevenson said:

    Just because she’s out doesn’t mean anything is going to change.

    Wiping away tears as she spoke to the crowd, Stevenson said Patel should resign next. She said:

    Cressida Dick – thank god she resigned.

    Priti Patel is next by the way, let’s not forget who’s in charge.

    That vigil was a vigil for Sarah Everard, and so many women are murdered at the hands of men.

    How dare they tell us to stay indoors.

    Patsy Stevenson has called for Home Secretary Priti Patel to resign at a feminist protest led by Sisters Uncut in Westminster (Laura Parnaby/PA).
    Patsy Stevenson has called for Home Secretary Priti Patel to resign (Laura Parnaby/PA)
    Police Bill

    Protester Marvina Newton described the police as “a corrupt system that’s rotten to the core”.

    “The bigger system is broken,” she told PA. She added:

    We want to kill the Police, Crime and Sentencing Bill, we want to make sure that our children’s children should be able to have the democratic right to fight an oppressive power.

    Marvina Newton at the Sisters Uncut protest (Laura Parnaby/PA)
    Marvina Newton at the Sisters Uncut protest (Laura Parnaby/PA)

    If passed, the bill would give police greater powers to control protests. They would be able to impose start and finishing times, set limits on noise, and fine protesters who break rules up to £2.5k.

    Educate men, not women

    Revisiting advice given following Everard’s murder, activist Jill Mountford said women “should never, ever be told again that the answer is to carry a rape alarm”.

    Mountford is a community worker from Lewisham, south-east London. She told PA:

    First of all, they (the government) need to stop the cuts that are happening to local authorities…

    We should never, ever be told again that the answer is to carry a rape alarm or to stay indoors.

    The answer doesn’t lie with us, it lies with men in society, it lies with the Government and the cops and the police particularly.

    Jill Mountford, 61, at a Sisters Uncut protest on Saturday (Laura Parnaby/PA)
    Jill Mountford at the protest (Laura Parnaby/PA)

    Breach of protesters’ rights

    Saturday’s protest also comes one day after High Court judges found the Met had breached the rights of organisers of the vigil for Everard. The court said the Met failed “to perform its legal duty” to consider whether they had a “reasonable excuse” for holding the gathering amid coronavirus (Covid-19) restrictions.

    Sisters Uncut protest

    The Sisters Uncut protest began with a blockage on Victoria Embankment road outside Scotland Yard (James Manning/PA)

    Reclaim These Streets held the vigil for Everard near to where she went missing in Clapham, south London, in March 2021.

    The Met has been contacted for comment.

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • Organisations which ran the institutions in the North of Ireland where children were abused have been urged to atone by contributing to the redress fund. Representatives of six – including religious orders, Barnardos and the Irish Church Missions – offered an apology to abuse survivors.

    However, survivors rejected the apology as too little, too late coming five years after it was recommended following the Historical Institutional Abuse Inquiry and decades after the former homes closed.

    Historical institutional abuse apology
    Cait O’Leary speaking on behalf of the Good Shepherd Sisters order in the Northern Ireland Assembly chamber at Stormont during the delivery of the long-awaited public apology to the victims of historical institutional abuse (Brian Lawless/PA)

    The institutions “failed miserably”

    Jon McCourt, of Survivors North West, said he felt representatives of the institutions “failed miserably”. He urged them to demonstrate their atonement by contributing to the redress fund for survivors.


    McCourt said:

    If this was the best the church could offer by way of an apology, they failed miserably,

    There was no emotion, there was no ownership, there was qualification.

    Forget about having conversations and just start contributing to the redress fund.

    One of the things that we were all raised with was this thing about atonement and a firm purpose of amendment. I don’t believe that the church and the institutions atoned today and I don’t believe that there was a firm purpose of trying to put this right.

    The way they can put it right is to do what the religious orders have just done in Scotland and make a significant contribution immediately to the redress fund.

    Historical institutional abuse apology
    Margaret McGuckin (front right), of victims’ group Savia, speaks to the media in the Great Hall at Stormont after proceedings where the long-awaited public apology to the victims of historical institutional abuse was given (Brian Lawless/PA)

    They delayed and were insincere

    Margaret McGuckin, of victims’ group Savia, said the Executive Office “made a fool out of us” with regard to long delays in acting on the recommendations of the Historical Institutional Abuse Inquiry, adding that many victims are now “dead and gone” after the long wait for an apology. McGuckin said:

    The Executive Office took their eye off the wheel and we had to hamper them and hamper them and come up here for meetings after meetings which were useless,

    This into the 15th year of campaigning. You just couldn’t believe this, that we’d have to do this, beg and plead for someone to listen. We did that as young children.

    They said here that these things happened back in the day, in the 1950s and 60s, things have changed but the way we have been treated all these years has hurt and damaged us so much.

    And I can say that for myself, underneath the make-up and the lipstick I am a broken wreck… this has caused much more pain and trauma upon ourselves and life will never be the same.

    The apology today was more than welcomed but we had to demand, lobby and threaten with more legal action to get to this stage. It’s unbelievable so I will not slap them on the back and say well done.

    McGuckin said she believes the Stormont ministers were sincere in their apology, but not the institutions. She added:

    It’s easy to read off a script, the words were easily made up, do I believe them, certainly not,

    They were made and forced to come to this stage today, with the greatest respect, they are not sincere at all.

    I believe the ministers were (sincere) and they felt it, but as far as the religious orders and the others, they were forced into that situation and I would take that with a pinch of salt.

    This apology has come too late

    Peter Murdoch, a former resident of Nazareth Lodge Orphanage, said the apology came 30 years too late for him, and he could not accept it. He described being abused over five years, and said as a child he regarded the institution “like an SS camp”.

    He said his older brother, Charles, was also in the institution and suffered throughout his life with alcohol because of the experience. He died on December 1 2021. Murdoch said he has PTSD because of his experiences over the past 30 years. He said:

    I have been in and out twice of prison because of snapping because of what happened to me,

    Why did they not apologise 30 years ago? Thirty years ago, they hopefully would have meant it. In my personal opinion I can’t accept the apology but for anybody else it is completely up to them. My brother, if he was alive today, he would have cried.

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on The Canary.