Category: UK

  • The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) told a severely ill claimant to leave hospital to make his social security claim. He later died. Now, a coroner wants answers from the department. But the case is sadly just one in a long line of catastrophic failures by the DWP – ones which have repeatedly involved claimants’ deaths.

    Terence Talbot

    Disability News Service (DNS) first reported on the case of Terence Talbot. He lived with a rare disease called drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), or drug hypersensitivity syndrome. It’s where people react to certain medications. Symptoms usually first include a high temperature and skin rash. In some cases it can be life-threatening and lead to organ failure. Sadly, this happened to Talbot.

    He lived with bipolar disorder. Doctors put him on olanzapine and risperidone which are drugs to help treat the condition. This was while they detained him under the Mental Health Act. The problem is that the drugs caused Talbot to develop DRESS. As the coroner’s report stated, doctors diagnosed it in October 2019 after they gave him the drugs.  It noted that Talbot, while being an inpatient at a psychiatric hospital, also:

    had multiple discharges from acute hospital following admission for symptoms of DRESS syndrome with severe exfoliative dermatitis. Prescribed emollients [skin treatments, like cream] were recorded as self administered although Mr Talbot could not apply them effectively himself. Food, fluid and nutrition was not adequate to meet Mr. Talbot’s needs and nasogastric feeding was commenced on 26th February 2020… this feeding did not meet his needs… He was treated for aspiration pneumonia on 3rd March and suffered a left sided pneumothorax [collapsed lung] on 4th March treated with drain insertion. Mr Talbot was diagnosed with empyema [pus in the chest cavity] treated with antibiotics and his DRESS Syndrome failed to improve and he was placed on end-of-life care.

    Talbot died of multiple organ failure on 9 April 2020. This was due to the DRESS causing empyema and pneumonia. And at some point during this period, the DWP got involved.

    The DWP gets involved

    It is unclear from the coroner’s report just when or how the DWP got in touch with Talbot. But the department contacted him while he was in hospital, saying he had to attend a Jobcentre about his social security claim. The coroner’s report noted that this was instead of him making an “electronic claim”. As the coroner stated:

    I heard from all the doctors and a senior nurse in this case who have a considerable experience across a range of specialties and across several different NHS Trusts that they have never experienced nor heard of a case where a severely ill inpatient was required by the Department of Work & Pensions to leave hospital to attend its offices in person to make a claim for welfare benefits. Terence Talbot was suffering with a mental disorder and an exceptionally rare and complex disease with a risk of death and suffering severe exfoliative dermatitis that rendered him very vulnerable to infection.

    DNS editor John Pring noted on Twitter that:

    there’s no evidence DWP’s actions led to his death; the facts are still fairly scarce at this point so we also don’t know if Terence Talbot actually attended the jobcentre or was too ill.

    Answers are needed

    What’s clear is that the coroner thinks the DWP has questions to answer. She’s told work and pensions secretary Thérèse Coffey that she has to respond to the report by 28 January:

    Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise, you must explain why no action is proposed.

    A claimant’s death and the DWP’s involvement while they were severely unwell is sadly not uncommon. As The Canary previously reported, it has carried out dozens of reviews in the past few years into cases like Talbot’s. There are also countless specific cases like:

    • David Clapson. He was diabetic and died in 2013 after the DWP stopped his social security – leaving him without enough electric to run his fridge which he kept his insulin in. It also left him with barely any food.
    • Jodey Whiting. She took her own life in 2017 after the DWP stopped her social security.
    • Errol Graham. He starved to death in 2018 after the DWP stopped his social security.

    Moreover, Talbot’s case is not wholly unique. Weighing just six stone, Stephen Smith died from multiple health problems in 2019 after the DWP stopped his social security. But before that, the department left him no choice but to leave hospital to go to a tribunal to appeal it denying him social security. According the Liverpool Echo his appeal was successful “after a tribunal judge saw he could barely walk down the street let alone hold down a job”. He died shortly after this.

    We also know the DWP has already destroyed dozens of reports into claimant deaths.

    35,000 dead

    A DWP spokesperson told DNS:

    Our condolences are with Mr Talbot’s family. We are considering the report and will respond in due course.

    As The Canary previously reported, around 35,000 claimants have died across several years:

    They died either waiting for the DWP to sort their claims or after it said they were well enough to work or start moving towards work. Moreover, in 2018 alone there could have been 750 (if not more) people who took their own lives while claiming from the DWP. But across five years, the department only reviewed 69 cases of people taking their own lives.

    Yet the DWP still says the issue of claimants dying on its watch isn’t a “systemic” problem.

    The problem is systemic

    It’s unclear at this stage just what the DWP’s specific actions were in Talbot’s case. Once it has responded to the coroner, we will know more. But the very fact that it would even attempt to make a seriously ill claimant leave hospital is damning. It points to a wider problem in the department of, at best, systemic failures. At worst, it shows a culture of neglect and intransigence to the lives of the very people it’s supposed to be supporting.

    Featured image via Ann Larie Valentine – Flickr, recoloured and cropped to 770 x 403 licenced under CC BY-SA 2.0, and Wikimedia 

    By Steve Topple

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • England is a “global outlier” in the fight against the Omicron wave of coronavirus (Covid-19) because of its anti-restrictions stance, Wales’ first minister has said.

    Political paralysis

    At a Welsh Government press briefing on 7 January, Mark Drakeford once again aimed a blistering attack at Boris Johnson. He said:

    In England, we have a Government that is politically paralysed, with a Prime Minister who is unable to secure an agreement through his Cabinet to take the actions that his advisers have been telling him ought to have been taken.

    And even if he could get his Cabinet to address them, he can’t get his MPs to agree them.

    Asked to justify the continuation of restrictions for another week following the Welsh Government’s weekly review, while neighbouring England remains rule-free, the first minister said:

    The outlier here is not Wales. Wales is taking action, as is Scotland, as is Northern Ireland, and as are countries right across Europe, and right across the globe.

    The one country that stands out as not taking action to protect its population is England.

    The real question is, why is England such a global outlier, in the way in which governments elsewhere are attempting to protect their populations from coronavirus?

    The political contrast between Wales and England is this: here in Wales we have a Government that is capable of acting and determined to act when it is necessary to protect our population.

    PM who oversaw 130k coronavirus deaths in England gives his expert opinion

    Johnson and a number of Conservative MPs mocked Wales’s restrictions during a House of Commons session in Parliament on 6 January. The PM called the measures “baroque eccentricities”, and former business secretary Andrea Leadsom described them as “bonkers”. Lichfield MP Michael Fabricant said it was “no more than political posturing”.

    Alert level 2 restrictions remain in Wales, including wearing face coverings indoors, groups in public places such as restaurants limited to six people, and working from home if possible.

    Indoor events of more than 30 people or outdoor events for more than 50 people are not allowed.

    Drakeford said 994 people with coronavirus are being treated in Welsh hospitals – a rise of 43% compared with last week and the highest number since last March – while around 40 are in critical care, the majority of whom are unvaccinated. He said Omicron is putting significant pressure on the NHS, due to rising hospital admissions and staff absences, but denied it is “overwhelmed”.

    The latest data from Public Health Wales shows another 38 people have died from coronavirus; however, Drakeford said those are likely to have been from the Delta variant.

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • 3 Mins Read The vegan launches continue to roll in during the first week of Veganuary. The latest: U.S.-based pizza chains Domino’s and Pizza Hut have added vegan options including vegan pepperoni and vegan Buffalo chicken. Domino’s has launched its first vegan pepperoni pizza in the UK, which it’s calling PepperoNAY. The new pies are available across all […]

    The post Domino’s and Pizza Hut Expand Vegan Options for Veganuary appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • 3 Mins Read As another Veganuary begins, the stats for 2021 have started rolling in. Amongst them, Deliveroo has announced that it witnessed an overall 117 percent surge in searches for vegan-specific food since last year’s event. The delivery platform has added more plant-based-friendly partners to its listings as a result. Last year Deliveroo reported that Deliveroo Hong […]

    The post Deliveroo Reveals Massive 117% Surge In Searches For Vegan Food Options Since Veganuary 2021 appeared first on Green Queen.

    This post was originally published on Green Queen.

  • Tony Blair receiving the queen’s highest honour, rather than being tried for war crimes, is the establishment doing what it does best – serving its own interests. Curtis Daly asks: is it time to abolish the honours system?


    The United Kingdom has an archaic honours system that began in 1066. At the turn of this new year, those who’ve been ‘honoured’ leave a lot to be desired – as does the system itself. Does the honours system dishonour us?

    The 2022 new years honours list has been revealed. It recognises everyone from those who have served in the medical field to the most recent actor to play James Bond. However, the ones that have made the headlines have also been the most controversial.

    Tony Blair wasn’t just given any old honour, he was given the ”Knight Companion of the Most Noble Order of the Garter.” That’s both the oldest order of British chivalry and the highest ranking.’

    A bunch of words that are only important to the British establishment.

    We know why he was given an honour. Blair represents exactly what the British state embodies. The man is encapsulated within the establishment. His tenure as prime minister served the status quo, and now, lucky for Blair, the status quo serves him.

    Since leaving office 15 years ago, Blair has embarked on a lifestyle of riches befriending those in high places.

    With multiple properties under his belt, cozy relationships with dictators and tycoons, it’s no wonder he was worth an estimated £60m in 2015.

    A petition that currently stands at over 700,000 signatures is calling for his knighthood to be stripped.

    Of course it’s possible nothing will come of it, after all nothing came of a million people marching to stop Blair’s war – but it’s very poignant that over half a million have spoken up, when it was estimated in 2018 that around 500,000 people were killed in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars he helped start.’

    The British establishment may have thought that people have forgotten or forgiven his past crimes, but that’s clearly not true – people still despise him.

    Less well known figure Trevor Phillips was also included. This man was formally the chair of the Equalities and Human Rights Commission, yet was suspended from the Labour Party in 2020 for alleged Islamophobia. 

    Phillips, who has been quoted as saying that Muslims are creating “nations within nations”, was somehow elevated to the position of authority on equality. Obviously it’s no surprise our British institutions don’t take racism seriously, when they employ people like Phillips.

    It wouldn’t be a proper honours list if there wasn’t a billionaire on there, but don’t worry, we are in luck!

    Hedge fund boss David Harding was awarded a knighthood for his services to philanthropy.

    He was indeed very generous, as he’s given £1.5m to the Conservative Party.

    John-Paul Marks, a civil servant of the Scottish government, was named a Companion of the Order of the Bath. 

    It’s worth noting that Marks pocketed £30,000 in bonuses when he was director of the DWP. 

    The honours system is quite clearly a sham, and Jeff Stelling perfectly encapsulates the anger many people feel.

    “The new year’s honours should go to someone- not go to someone, for doing their job well and being paid for it. They should not go to the rich and famous, they should not go to sportsmen or women for simply winning something. They should not go to political cronies. They should go to ordinary people doing extraordinary things in terms of charity, heroism or terrific community work. Those are the people that should get OBEs and MBEs and not me, and not a lot of people on that list today.”

    The sentiment expressed is good, but it does miss the central point. The honours system upholds the myth of the divine monarch, bestowing awards to her subjects. It perpetuates the story of empire and colonisation, and it’s precisely this image that the Conservatives use to sell themselves, and that Keir Starmer is also now pushing with his nationalist speeches in front of union flags.

    For me and you, these awards are nonsensical and meaningless. They are representative of incredibly archaic structures. Despite social change and our attitudes towards class, race, and sexuality transforming significantly, the structures of the British State have been largely unchanged.

    The monarchy, the honours system, and knighthoods are the epitome of inequality, especially of class.

    Can we really call ourselves a democratic society with corrupt politicians and people of immense wealth being honoured by the British establishment?

    It’s hard to see how.

    We want to continue to make these videos and we want to continue to publish articles that matter to you against the noise of the mainstream media. So please give this video a like, it really helps. You can also share with your friends and family.

    And if you can, please consider becoming a supporter. Signing up to give a small, regular amount monthly helps us enormously. We aren’t propped up by wealthy backers, but are instead powered by people like you who want to be part of creating a positive change in the world.

    By Curtis Daly

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • Right-wing figures seem very confused by the acquittal of those dubbed the Colston Four. The four activists were on trial for criminal damage relating to the toppling of Tory slaver Edward Colston’s statue into the River Avon in 2020. Rhian Graham, Milo Ponsford, Sage Willoughby and Jake Skuse were all found not guilty by a jury. There were scenes of celebration as a result of the ruling.

    But not everyone was happy it seems. Right-wing commentators and politicians turned out on Twitter to express their sadness and confusion that those who toppled the slaver’s statue had been acquitted.

    Confused

    Among these was former Sun editor Kelvin MacKenzie. MacKenzie simply could not understand why the four had been let off. He went as far as to question the jury’s mental health:

    Tory MP Robert Jenrick was similarly alarmed at the verdict. He suggested that toppling Colston – who, incidentally, was also a Tory MP – amounted to making vandalism an acceptable form of protest:

    While Blackpool MP Scott Benton called the decision “appalling”  and branded the original protest a “violent act”

    Top prize

    Top prize for sad right-winger, however, must go to commentator Darren Grimes. Grimes lamented the idea that you could now “destroy public property” if it was a “noble” cause.

    The GB News contributor asked if the representation of Karl Marx in Highgate Cemetery in London could legitimately be toppled according to that logic:

    Though he failed to note that, unlike Colston’s statue, Marx’s Highgate monument is also the German revolutionary’s gravestone.

    Slaver

    But it’s important never to let Tories and statue defenders have the last word. On the matter of Colston, left-wing MP Zarah Sultana captured the real spirit of the man and his sordid business practices:

    As Sultana rightly points out, Colston was involved in transporting tens of thousands of African people to the Caribbean. Nineteen thousand of whom died during the passage. Once there, they were further subjected to all the brutalities that characterised that disgusting practice.

    And the Bristol band Massive Attack also weighed in, saying that the stature should never have been there in the first place:

     

    Unlike the wealthy Tory slave-owner Edward Colston, few of his victims names are remembered. Seen in this light, the toppling of his statue in Bristol into the docks looks less like vandalism and more like a small meaure of justice for the victims of his horrendous actions.

    Featured image via Caitlin Hobbs/Wikimedia, cropped to 770×403 pixels, licensed under CC BY 4.0

    By Joe Glenton

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • By Ralph Underhill

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • A man who sent racist abuse to footballer Yannick Bolasie, and was then found to have images of child abuse on his phone, has been jailed. Kirk Thompson was handed a year-long prison term at Kirkcaldy Sheriff Court in Fife on Thursday by Sheriff Alastair Brown, who said the 22-year-old poses a risk of significant harm.

    “Keyboard warrior”

    Thompson, of Ravenscraig in Kirkcaldy, was exposed on social media by the DR Congo star, who shared a screenshot of the racial slur sent to him in a direct message in March last year. The footballer said his abuser was a “keyboard warrior”.

    Brown told Thompson that his actions were deliberate and contributed to what he described as a trend of abuse being sent online and a toxic environment. He said:

    The court is aware that those in any sort of prominent position in public regularly receive abusive texts and are denigrated online by those whose only qualification to do so is they are able to switch on a mobile phone.

    He added the words used seek to “diminish the individual”, and told him:

    Courts will always take abuse of that sort very seriously.

    Crystal Palace FA Cup Media Day – Beckenham Training Ground
    Yannick Bolasie was targeted with racist abuse by Kirk Thompson (Paul Harding/PA)

    Pleaded guilty to three charges

    At the time, midfielder Bolasie, 32, was on loan to Middlesbrough from Everton. When the footballer saw the message, he shared it and wrote:

    Something seriously wrong with people… keyboard warriors.

    Still yet to meet a person who had this energy when they saw me.

    Thompson pleaded guilty to three charges: possession of indecent images of children, permitting to be taken or making indecent images of children, and sending a racist message. During a police search of his phone last March, four indecent images and movies were discovered.

    Two were rated category A, considered to be the most severe, and two were category B. One other image found with text added to it was reported as category C. Brown ruled the harm to be significant, despite the small number of images found in Thompson’s possession.

    Thompson was sentenced to a 12-month prison term for the first two charges, and to four months for sending the racist abuse. The sentences will run concurrently. He must also sign the sex offenders register.

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • The RAC has accused petrol retailers of taking advantage of customers by not passing on lower wholesale prices. The motoring organisation described December as a “rotten month” for drivers who it claimed could have been overcharged by £5m a day for petrol.

    Petrol prices dropped by 2p per litre over the month although the organisation said drivers should have roughly seen a 12p fall. RAC fuel watch figures showed that the price of unleaded petrol dropped from 147.47p a litre to 145.48p. However, it added that drivers should have witnessed prices “nearer to 135p”.

    Taking advantage of people

    Diesel dropped by just under 2p a litre from 150.80p to 148.92p when drivers should have been paying around 142p, according to the report. Simon Williams, fuel spokesman for the RAC, said:

    December was a rotten month for drivers as they were taken advantage of by retailers who rewrote their pump price strategy, costing motorists millions of pounds as a result.

    Their resistance to cutting prices and to only pass on a fraction of the savings they were making from lower wholesale costs is nothing short of scandalous.

    The 10p extra retailers have added to their long-term margin of 6p a litre has led to petrol car drivers paying £5 million more a day than they previously would have.

    The price of a litre of unleaded on the wholesale market, including delivery, averaged 106p across the month, the RAC said. Williams added:

    In the past, when wholesale prices have dropped, retailers have always done the right thing –eventually – and reduced their pump prices.

    This time they’ve stood strong, taking advantage of all the media talk about ‘higher energy prices’ and banked on the oil price rising again and catching up with their artificially inflated prices, which it has now done.

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • The UK government’s recently updated guidance for the permitted killing of wild birds has caused quite a stir. The furore and confusion over the general licences for shooting these birds has pushed an image created by Wild Justice and a Twitter thread by George Monbiot to the fore.

    Both leave any planet-saving credentials the Conservative government hoped to start 2022 with in tatters.

    General killing

    The government issues general licences that permit ‘authorised people‘, such as landowners, to kill certain birds under particular circumstances. Such circumstances can include when a species allegedly poses a danger of doing “serious damage” to so-called livestock, i.e. farmed animals.

    The current iteration of the general licences for England have caused a ruckus because they partially relate to the killing of wild birds for the bloodsports industry. Namely, they allow the authorised people to kill species like carrion crows to protect other species of birds that some people like to shoot. These birds – pheasants and red-legged partridges – are typically farmed and released in their millions each year to be shot at:

    However, people can’t go around shooting at farmed birds for ‘sport’ at will. So the latest general licences clarify when birds bred for the bullet are considered livestock and when they’re considered wild ‘gamebirds’. Funnily enough, the government has perfectly aligned the positioning of these classifications with the bloodsports industry’s interests.

    Classification gymnastics

    Wild Justice has taken the government to task over general licences. It pointed out that the latest guidance is a change “back to a previous version” of licence wording, alongside an actually new extension of the licences to cover two years rather than one. The guidance states that the definition of livestock for “the purpose of this licence” includes:

    game birds kept in an enclosure or which are free roaming but remain significantly dependent on the provision of food, water or shelter by a keeper for their survival. This does not include supplementary feeding.

    Wild Justice has created a helpful graphic to illustrate what this means in practice:

    Journalist George Monbiot also put together a Twitter thread that laid out the classification gymnastics this government legislation engages in:

    As the graphic and thread show, these laws appear to be designed to assist the bloodsports industry, rather than having any ecological or indeed ethical foundation. But Monbiot suggests that’s no surprise, when you consider who writes the law:

    Now or never

    The fact that the government permits the release of millions of non-native birds into the countryside for bloodsporters’ pleasure is itself highly controversial. Experts say they, and the activities associated with this ‘sport’, have a devastating impact on other wildlife and ecosystems. That the government is also engaging in classification and legal gymnastics that clearly benefit the bloodsports industry at the expense of wild native birds is atrocious.

    We are living through an extinction crisis for life on Earth. Many bird populations are plummeting in Europe and beyond. Governments that don’t prioritise protecting the world’s biodiversity, and the health of the climate, are not suitable leaders for an age of ecological breakdown. The Conservative government, with its peat-burning, badger-killing, woodland-destroying, bloodsport– and fossil fuel-friendly approach to governance is clearly one of them.

    Featured image via Guardian News / YouTube

    By Tracy Keeling

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • We live in a disgraceful time; a period when generations after us will look back and wonder how we could have been so cruel. They will wonder why so many of us, in our comfortable lives in Europe, left our fellow human beings to drown at sea; how we remained silent.

    They will ask us how we could have let our government invade other countries for profit, or how we pretended not to notice that weapons used to arm Saudi Arabia, Israel, or the US were made in our towns. They will question how we didn’t see our complicity: how our government’s meddling in other parts of the world contributed to millions of people having to flee their homes.

    We live in a time when instead of rescuing people from the perilous Channel, we want to literally push them back out of our waters, leaving them to die. November 2020 saw one of the deadliest days ever for refugees attempting to cross the Channel. 27 people died, including children. Only two people survived. The government, having shut down any safe legal routes to cross, is squarely to blame for these deaths.

    So we should breathe a sigh of relief that the first refugees of 2022 arrived safely on Kent shores on the morning of Tuesday 4 January.

    Despite it all, there is hope. There are activists on the ground, working in solidarity with people trying to escape to a safe life. Many have been making regular visits to the refugee camps in Calais over the last twenty years. Others are out at sea, actively rescuing people. Some, like activists in Lesbos, are facing prison for the essential work they have done to save lives.

    Meet Channel Rescue

    In the UK, one organisation on the ground is Channel Rescue, based on the shores of Kent. I asked the team what they do. They said:

    Essentially, we stand on the shore, spot boats and monitor Border Force. We aim to fact find, document and assist landings, act as legal observers, and provide immediate support to those making the crossing. If we see a dinghy in distress, we will inform the coast guard and RNLI.

    The group said:

    We will not sit back and allow the English Channel to become a mass graveyard, like the waters of the Mediterranean.

    I asked Channel Rescue whether the team thinks the government is complicit in the deaths of people at land and sea borders. They replied:

    The securitisation and militarisation of Europe’s borders is an unsustainable policy and research has suggested that 2,000 lives have been lost due to pushback policies. There is a need to reallocate funding away from militaristic solutions towards the creation of safe routes for claim[ing] asylum.

    Indeed, unbeknownst to many people living in the UK, ships ply the waters of Europe, ready to push back those who seek asylum. Meanwhile, €5.6bn has been reserved for the EU’s border agency Frontex from 2021-2027. According to Abolish Frontex:

    Frontex has been recruiting an army of border guards who can own and use handguns, and aims to have 10,000 guards by 2027.

    The agency can now buy its own equipment – such as ships, helicopters and drones – benefiting the arms, security and surveillance companies that have been so influential in shaping the EU’s border and defence policies through lobbying.

    Meanwhile, according to Corporate Watch:

    Border Force, the Home Office unit patrolling the UK’s external borders, is planning £385 million of new spending on patrol boats, security guards, dogs, drones and other equipment. Much of this is likely to be used in the Channel, targeting refugees trying to cross the water.

    Countries like the UK, France, and Germany remain in the top ten of the world’s largest arms exporters. The militarisation of borders ensures that their arms company mates continue to rake in millions in profits. It’s a cruel irony that the very companies responsible for displacing people from their homes – through the use of their weapons – also hold responsibility for the murder of the same people who have had to flee their bombs.

    border force

    Yet another racist bill is about to be passed

    After the 27 people died in the Channel in November, Priti Patel expressed her “profound sorrow“, but, of course, didn’t shoulder any responsibility, instead blaming “criminal gangs” who have “a complete, absolute disregard for human rights”. She also said:

    These journeys across the Channel are absolutely unnecessary.

    Quite how the home secretary came to this conclusion is unfathomable, when the UK government makes any other access routes to the country impossible.

    While Patel was shedding crocodile tears, she was also pushing through the racist Nationality and Borders Bill, which has passed through the House of Commons and is now in its second reading in the House of Lords.

    According to Scottish social justice secretary Shona Robison and her Welsh counterpart Jane Hutt:

    This legislation contains measures that will prevent migrants crossing the English Channel in small boats, including the barbaric suggestions for ‘push-back’ exercises involving enforcement officials seeking to repel small boats.

    And according to Channel Rescue:

    The Nationality and Borders Bill will criminalise those assisting people making the crossing, even if there is no gain for those assisting.

    I asked them whether they are worried about being prosecuted by the state for their work, much like activists in Lesbos have. They said:

    There is a clause stating that organisations supporting refugees will not be prosecuted. We are doubtful whether the government will seek to criminalise us, as there is currently no provision for them to do so.

    Support Channel Rescue

    As the UK government and its Schengen counterparts continue to make safe passage impossible for refugees, it’s imperative that we all step up. One way we can do this is to oppose the Nationality and Borders Bill and not let it pass without a fight. We can also support Channel Rescue in its work. The team told me:

    People can support Channel Rescue by sending us donations, buying items from our wishlist, and by volunteering with us. We would gratefully appreciate more people living in Kent becoming involved. Many of our volunteers do live locally, however, we also have some limited volunteer accommodation.

    Channel Rescue is also bringing a case against Priti Patel to try to ensure that her new policy on pushbacks isn’t successful. The case comes after the activists witnessed Border Force training members of staff to use pushback tactics in the Channel. The public can also donate to fund the case.

    It’s time that we stopped remaining silent. We all need to stand up and oppose these deadly policies and take action against the companies that perpetuate and profit from this misery.

    Featured images via Channel Rescue

    By Eliza Egret

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • It’s only the start of January. But already the government has shown that blind and low vision people are an afterthought. Because its Disability Unit managed to create a video about them which was inaccessible.

    World Braille Day

    Tuesday 4 January was World Braille Day. As the UN explained:

    World Braille Day, celebrated since 2019, is observed to raise awareness of the importance of Braille as a means of communication in the full realization of the human rights for blind and partially sighted people…

    Braille is a tactile representation of alphabetic and numerical symbols using six dots to represent each letter and number, and even musical, mathematical and scientific symbols.

    It also noted that braille:

    is essential in the context of education, freedom of expression and opinion, as well as social inclusion, as reflected in article 2 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.

    But the government clearly forgot the “social inclusion” aspect of Twitter. Because it managed to put content out about braille that was inaccessible to blind and low vision people.

    Accessibility?

    The Disability Unit is part of the Cabinet Office. It’s been responsible for publishing the government’s new disability strategy. On 4 January, the Disability Unit released a video for World Braille Day. It gave a brief overview of the subject. But the video had no narration. Therefore, it was inaccessible to blind and low vision people:

    People also pointed out that the Disability Unit may have made some mistakes with its history of braille claims:

    But the Disability Unit was not the only department that put out inaccessible content for World Braille Day.

    The DWP: a repeated problem

    The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) put out a tweet with an image that had no alt text. That is, blind and low vision people would not know what the image was of nor what text was in it:

    Not that this was the first time the DWP has done this. Its last image-based tweet also did not have alt text:

     

    Blind people: clearly an afterthought

    The Canary asked the Cabinet Office for comment. A government Equality Hub spokesperson said:

    The Government’s Equality Hub is committed to providing accessible content on all of our channels.

    In line with our commitment, the text in this video was also tweeted in order to ensure that it is accessible to screen readers.

    But as Connor Scott-Gardner said on Twitter:

    Braille is an important part of our cultural history as blind people. I’m curious to know why a decision was made to produce a video that is inaccessible to us?

    So, it seems that for the Conservative government, blind and low vision people are an afterthought. As one Twitter user summed up:

    this must be a joke?!! No narration or audio description. There is absolutely zero excuse for this. It must be a deliberate and egregious demonstration of tokenism. This government’s default. Not only pretend to give a fuck but disenfranchise them simultaneously!

    Let’s hope the government does better for the rest of the year. But sadly, that’s probably unlikely.

    Featured image via the Disability Unit – screengrab

    By Steve Topple

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • The jury is currently considering its verdict in the trial of four of the people who toppled a statue of slave trader Edward Colston. On 4 January, Bristol Crown Court heard closing speeches from the defence and the prosecution.

    The pulling down of the statue happened during Bristol’s huge Black Lives Matter demonstration on 7 June 2020.

    The trial of the Sage Willoughby, Rhian Graham, Milo Ponsford, and Jake Skuse – dubbed the ‘Colston Four’ – has been ongoing since last December, and 4 January was the first day back in court after a break for Christmas and New Year.

    Blinne Ní Ghrálaigh – the defence barrister for Rhian Graham – told the jury in her closing speech that Colston was responsible for the enslavement of 84,000 Black people – including 12,000 children – and the deaths of 19,000 people. She said that a:

    line in the sand was drawn on 7 June 2020 by those who joined together to pull the statue down and to dump it in the harbour. They recognised the need to make clear that Colston’s victims, those 84,000 Black lives more than three times the total number of the Black community in Bristol today that they mattered. That those Black lives matter. That they will not be forgotten or airbrushed out of history. That their descendants’ pain will not be ignored. That their slaver their tormenter will not continue to have his crimes whitewashed, as he towers above them on his pedestal.

    She said that those enslaved by Colston were:

    torn from their homes and families; chained; whipped; branded with a red hot iron with the initials of his company; and shipped across the sea as things – not as human beings – on a journey of horror

    She continued:

    You heard about the slave ships… You’ve heard about the chilling term “wastage”. You heard about the rapes and beatings. You heardabout it taking seven years to literally work an enslaved person to death.

    Raj Chada – defence counsel for Jake Skuse – said to the jury:

    The statue of Edward Colston, standing in the centre of Bristol, [was] utterly indecent, offensive and disgraceful. We all know that.

    An act of defiance against racism

    The Bristol demonstration was part of the global Black Lives Matter movement that came in the wake of the killing of George Floyd by Minneapolis police.

    Ní Ghrálaigh told the jury:

    On 25 May 2020 shortly after 8:20 pm, African American George Floyd  was murdered by police officer Derek Chauvin, who knelt on his neck for 8 minutes and 46 seconds until he stopped breathing. The video of his long drawn out killing went viral around the world. People heard his repeated pleas of “I can’t breathe” and his desperate cry to his dead mother

    People in Bristol were quick to join the movement. On 7 June, 10,000 people gathered on College Green for the biggest in a series of powerful Black Lives Matter demonstrations. Tiffany Lyare – one of the demonstrators – told Vogue Magazine at the time:

    I didn’t want to protest just because of the loss of George Floyd’s life, but because of the fact that I am also black and I have experienced discrimination and racism first hand

    Lyare added:

    It almost felt like it was a personal attack to myself in a way

    We all toppled Colston

    As the marched passed the statue of Edward Colston, people paused and began to work together to remove the statue by putting a rope around its neck and pulling.

    The court was reminded that one of the police witnesses earlier in the case had estimated that thousands of people had been involved in taking the statue down. According to Ní Ghrálaigh:

    Police Officer Julie Hayward estimated that there were in excess of 3,000 people around the statue, just under a third of her estimated total of at least 10,000 marchers.

    These included:

    Those people around the statue who joined together spontaneously to pull as one on the rope that Rhian Graham had supplied [and] those people who applauded them as they did.

    Ní Ghrálaigh told the court that:

    After the slave trader was toppled, and the jubilations were over, a Black man knelt on Edward Colston’s neck for 8 minutes and 46 seconds, the length of George Floyd’s slow murder. The statue was rolled to the harbour and unceremoniously dumped in the water.

    Chada told the jury that Jake Skuse was one of the people who helped drag the statue across the cobblestones to the harbour. According to Chada, the cobblestones were:

    cobbles which in his mind signified where people would have been dragged unwillingly in centuries before, dragged to the harbour in the symbolic act of being dumped there.

    At least I wont have to see that fucking slave trader on my way to work anymore

    After the toppling of Colston, hundreds of messages of support were left at the foot of the – now empty – plinth. Some of them read:

    I want to send my gratitude to the people who participated in the toppling of the Colston statue. It was never an erasing of culture but creating a better informed history…

    Power to the people. Equality is Quality.

    and:

    At least I wont have to see that fucking slave trader on my way to work anymore.

    Aftermath

    The events of 7 June – and the momentum of the global Black Lives Matter movement – led to the renaming of Bristol’s Colston Hall and a decision to rename two schools in Bristol named after the slave trader. The court also heard that a pub in Bristol changed its name; that the stained glass windows and other dedications to Colston had been removed from St Mary Redcliffe Church and Bristol Cathedral, and that Colston Tower has been renamed Beacon Tower. The Colston Society also voted to close itself down.

    The court heard that the toppling of the statue of Colston had been celebrated in Trinidad and had been mentioned during the funeral of George Floyd in the US. Ní Ghrálaigh told the jury:

    Gloria Daniel, the great, great granddaughter of the enslaved child John Isaac, emphasised the significance of the toppling. She said that it served as a marker that we had finally arrived at a place in history where  people would no longer tolerate the continuing dehumanisation of Black people.

    Despite the massive public support for the toppling of the statue, Avon & Somerset Police – egged on by Priti Patel – made a series of arrests and eventually charged the four people who are in court with criminal damage. The Glad Colston’s Gone campaign commented at the time:

    Hundreds can clearly be seen on camera to have been involved in various activities that led to this object being pushed into the harbour. Despite this, authorities have decided to single out four people

    In response to the statue toppling, the Tory government’s controversial Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill is proposing a new offence of damaging national monuments, which would make actions like the one against the Colston statue punishable by up to ten years imprisonment.

    ‘If you have a festering cancer like Colston, you cut it out’

    Tom Wainwright – the defence barrister for Milo Ponsford – likened the removal of the statue to removing a cancer:

    If you have a cancer like Colston festering in your city, you cut it out. Even a new plaque would only have been a sticking plaster. Cutting it out will leave a scar, so that people remember what was there in the past and make sure it doesn’t return, but only once it is gone can the body heal. You have heard during this trial of the positive impact this action had, in prompting action where there was lethargy, promoting understanding where there was ignorance, provoking discussion where there was silence. Not just in this city, not just in this country but around the world. Bristol, like its tower, is no longer weighed down by the name of Colston but is a beacon showing how to bring communities together.

    Stephen Clarke – who is an ex-lawyer observing the trial – tweeted:

    Clarke tweeted this about defence barrister Liam Walker’s closing speech on behalf of Sage Willoughby:

    A ‘deliberate defence’ of the slave trade

    The court heard that the statue was erected almost two centuries after Colston’s death, due primarily to the efforts and funds of James Arrowsmith. Ní Ghrálaigh told the court that Arrowsmith was part of the Society of Merchant Venturers

    This was the same society that Colston had been part of, and which had been instrumental in pushing forward centuries of white supremacy, enslavement, and colonisation.

    Ní Ghrálaigh explained the context of the memorialisation of the erection of the Colston statue in 1880:

    As you have heard, the statue of Colston was erected 170 years after Colston’s death. That was nearly 90 years after the slave trade had finally been outlawed in Britain.The statue celebrated someone from the distant past whom James Arrowsmith knew had made his fortune from slavery. Some historians believe that
    it was erected in direct response to the statue that went up the previous year to Edmund Burke, an opponent of the slave trade.

    The statue would not just have been a whitewash of Colston’s role in the slave trade. If those historians are right, it would have been a deliberate defence of the trade, at a time when the depravity of treating human beings as things had long been laid bare

    The judge in the case reminded the jury of the evidence of Jonathan Finch, head of Culture and Creative Industries for Bristol Council, who told the court under cross-examination from the defence that “concerns had been raised” about the statue at least as far back as the early twentieth century, and that campaigns had been calling for its removal since at least the 1990s.

    The jury was reminded that Finch admitted that people felt “very strongly” about it.

    But Chada told the jury that the council had done nothing about these community concerns:

    Despite knowing about all about its offensive nature, the statue was displayed for over 100 years. And the Council did nothing. They achieved absolutely nothing but over 100 years of inaction.

    Ní Ghrálaigh and Chada told the jury that – after years of public pressure – the council had considered correcting the plaque, which extolled the virtue of Colston. However, the correction was thwarted when the Society of Merchant Venturers intervened.

    Ní Ghrálaigh pointed out that Cleo Lake –  former lord mayor of Bristol – and said it embarrassing” that the defendantswere in the dock for doing something that many democrats in the City believed should have been done decades ago“.

    Both Chada and Ní Ghrálaigh invited the jury to ask themselves why the council were appearing as witnesses for the prosecution for the pulling down of the statue. According to Ní Ghrálaigh:

    Indeed, members of the Jury, you might think what on earth is the council doing giving evidence to support a conviction in this case, having itself so abjectly failed to deal with the statue for so many decades?

    The defence argued that the four defendants had a lawful excuse for the toppling of Colston.

    According to Ní Ghrálaigh

    Rhian Graham, and the many others who pulled down the statue recognised the need to say: this is not Bristol. A slave trader is not Bristol. We will not continue to dress up a devil in angels’ robes.

    “The unfinished business of a now discredited memory of slavery

    Bristol Radical History Group has published a collection of statements by Bristolians in support of the Colston topplers. You can read the full document here, but we thought it would be appropriate to end this piece by publishing one of them – written by a Black Bristolian.

    This statement is by Ros Martin – a local artist – who was arrested in January 2021 for attending a protest in support of the Colston topplers. Martin’s arrest and prolonged detention was condemned as another example of racist and discriminatory policing. She made the following statement at the time in support of the Colston Four:

    We take control of colonisation and slavery’s transatlantic narrative and legacies in our city through our actions of repair, reflection, remembrance the calling forth and honouring of African ancestors, whose blood and brutalised lives in plantation in the Caribbean and Americas built up the wealth of this city.

    Linking past and present we can vision a better future, one in which we move from being mere bystanders to calling out and actioning a more just Bristol for all.

    The toppling of the Colston statue… is the unfinished business of a now discredited memory of slavery in the city tainted in monuments to the so called ‘great and good of the city’, epitomising all that is selfserving and disingenuous about the wielding of power, not just in the past but currently in our midst.

    Thank you for pulling down the statue, such a burden lifted. Onwards in struggle

    Featured image via Youtube

    By Tom Anderson

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • A screenshot of Noof Al-Maadeed from her YouTube video entitled “The Return of #Noof_AlMaadeed to Qatar 2021”, posted on October 6, 2021

    Khalid Ibrahim, executive director of he Gulf Center for Human Rights posted on 29 December 2021 the case of Noof Al-Maadeed, a 23-year-old Qatari woman.

    When she faced domestic violence from members of her family, including her father, and government institutions failed to provide her with any protection, she fled her country to Britain after using her father’s phone without his knowledge to obtain permission to travel. In a television interview on August 4, 2020, she spoke of her November 26, 2019 escape from Qatar to Britain, via Ukraine.

    Upon arriving in Britain, she applied for asylum. During her stay in Britain, Al-Maadeed introduced herself as a defender of Qatari women’s rights and explained how male guardianship prevents women from working or traveling without a male family member’s consent, as well as how women victims of domestic violence are left with little protection.

    Al-Maadeed withdrew her application for asylum in Britain after receiving assurances from the Qatari authorities that she would be protected if she returned to her home country. On October 6, this year, Al-Maadeed posted on her Instagram account a video in which she explained the details of her return from London on September 30 to the capital, Doha, where she arrived the following day.

    What happened next is incomprehensible. Qatari authorities, who pledged to protect her, as it should with to all citizens, reneged on all their promises and left her alone trying to survive domestic abuse. In a video posted on her Twitter account on October 12, Al-Maadeed said that she had been subjected to three failed assassination attempts by her family. She also described her father’s coming into the lobby of the hotel where she was staying, despite being one of her main opponents and the reason for her running away from home. Perhaps the following tweet, dated October 12, honestly sums up the torments she suffered upon her return: https://platform.twitter.com/embed

    My family, and those who I count as my own, want to slaughter me.

    Shortly thereafter, she posted the following tweet: “Sheikh Tamim is the only one who can stop the danger to my life with his own hands.” On October 13, Al-Maadeed completely disappeared from social media, and her whereabouts have not yet been known. The Emir of Qatar, Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad, on whom Al-Maadeed relied for protection and pleaded for support, was not able to provide the necessary protection for a citizen who did not commit any violation and voluntarily returned to her country based on many promises from the authorities that they’ll keep her safe.

    Since her disappearance, there have been conflicting reports, with regards to what has happened to the 23-year-old. According to some reports, Al-Maadeed was killed by her family, while others reported her forcible detention in a psychiatric hospital under heavy sedation, Meanwhile, the Qatari government refuses to provide documented information to prove that she is alive, which raises many suspicions.

    The Gulf Center for Human Rights cannot confirm any of the above-mentioned reports but holds the authorities, who have pledged but failed to protect Noof Al-Maadeed, responsible for any harm done to her. At present, all information indicates that Al-Maadeed is facing serious risk to her life and freedom. If not killed, then it is a fact that she may be facing a lengthy incommunicado detention, which puts her life at imminent risk.

    The GCHR, once again calls on the international community, particularly UN institutions, and governments with influence in Qatar—including members of the European Union—to take immediate action to pressure the Qatari authorities to ensure that Al-Maadeed is safe and can live freely in Qatar.

    The government of Qatar cannot continue to ignore international opinion that is searching for the truth, and its absolute silence will be a sure condemnation, as it bears full responsibility for preserving the safety of its citizens, including Nouf Al-Maadeed.

    This post was originally published on Hans Thoolen on Human Rights Defenders and their awards.

  • 2022 has begun with yet another ridiculous claim from the Metropolitan police that it’s “supporting women’s safety“. There’s been uproar from the public since the Met tweeted a video on 2 January of its Taskforce Officers swabbing people’s hands for evidence of drug usage on the streets of Shoreditch. Embarrassingly for the Met, just one person – a woman – was arrested in the very operation that claimed to protect women.

    It’s exhausting to hear the same rhetoric parroted again and again, both by the police and by the government, claiming that they care about women’s lives. The government is doing nothing to tackle the systemic sexism and misogyny in society and in the police. Instead, it’s passing new laws that actually make women less safe, and is giving some of the country’s most violent men – police officers – inexhaustible new powers through both the police bill and the Covert Human Intelligence Sources Act, which was passed in 2021. The state has even provided further funding for Stasi-style undercover cops to lurk around in nightclubs (in the name of women’s safety, of course).

    Police are a danger to women

    While the police continue to claim that they’re making women safer, let’s remind ourselves of the fact that Sarah Everard was murdered by a Metropolitan police officer, and that the women who gathered to remember her were physically assaulted by the Met.

    And this is only the tip of the iceberg. Everard’s murderer was not just one ‘bad apple’. A document called #194andcounting shows that at least 194 women have been murdered by the police and prison system in England and Wales, either in state custody or in prison, since the 1970s. And let’s also remind ourselves of the disgusting Metropolitan police officers who took selfies of themselves next to the bodies of murdered women Bibaa Henry and Nicole Smallman.

    The police aren’t just a menace to women on the streets. They’re also dangerous in their own homes. Back in May 2021, Channel 4 News reported that 129 women had come forward in the last two years to report that their police officer partner was abusing either them or their children. Channel 4 said:

    At least 129 women have approached the Centre for Women’s Justice (CWJ) since 2019 with claims of being raped, beaten and coerced by their police officer spouses and partners.

    One former police commander described officer perpetrated domestic abuse as an “epidemic” within the force.

    Feminist group Sisters Uncut argues that while the police have power those who identify as women can never feel safe:

    In November 2021, Sisters Uncut stated that it was ‘withdrawing its consent to police power’. The group argued:

    The police claim Wayne Couzens was one bad apple, a lone monster, but we know 15 officers have killed women since 2009. We know colleagues referred to Couzens as ‘the rapist’. They did nothing. We know he exposed himself not once, but multiple times. They did nothing. We know he sent vile misogynistic racist and homophobic messages to colleagues on WhatsApp. They did nothing. We know that even after Couzens pled guilty, colleagues attended court to provide positive character references for him.

    It continued:

    We know the police treated the family of Bibaa Henry and Nicole Smallman with utter contempt: officers took photos of their dead bodies and turned the horrific violence they’d experienced into a joke. Women in Black, immigrant, disabled and working class communities bear the brunt of complicity in this corruption.

    You are not obliged to cooperate with the police

    Of course, when hassling people on the streets, the police count on the fact that many of us don’t actually know our rights. If an officer questions us, or demands to search us, we feel obliged to comply with them. But if the police are going to continue randomly swabbing people’s hands for drugs, it’s important to know that we can walk away. The police’s stop and search powers do not extend to random drugs tests as Green and Black Cross makes clear:

    So while the police continue to rely on the public’s naivety as it hassles people on nights out, remember that we all have the right to resist rather than comply.

    There’s still time to stop the policing bill

    We can see that the police do not make our streets any safer for women, nor will random drugs tests or stop and searches make any difference. The problem is the ingrained misogyny of men in our society, and of those who have the monopoly of violence against us.

    The police already abuse the powers they have – so giving them even more powers is terrifying. The police bill, with its frightening new amendments, is currently in the House of Lords and could soon become law. Now is our last chance to resist these sweeping police powers. A national day of action has been called on 15 January. Let’s take to the streets again and kill the bill before it’s too late.

    Featured image via screengrab

    By Eliza Egret

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • It’s no surprise that Keir Starmer neglected to mention Islamophobia in the Labour Party, it’s an issue that’s been ignored for far too long. 


    Video transcript

    Islamophobia in the Labour Party has been deeply entrenched for years. It didn’t start under Keir Starmer and it unfortunately wasn’t cured under Jeremy Corbyn.

    The Labour Party has been actually responsible for promulgating Islamophobia in the UK, I think really at a mainstream level ever since the beginning of the so-called war on terror under Tony Blair and New Labour. 

    We have to act within the terms set out in resolution 1441. That is our legal base. But it is the reason why I say frankly that if we do act, we should do so with a clear conscience and a strong heart.  

    And of course, in order to justify that war Muslims were demonised, and US State Department talking points were proliferated across the UK. We had the securitisation of Muslim communities, the othering, the demonisation of Muslims as terrorists, as people who want to oppress women, who hate gay people, all that kind of thing. 

    So these are sort of narratives that the Labour Party has historically over the last sort of 20 years been responsible for. Under Jeremy Corbyn, unfortunately, it wasn’t cured. We had a sort of different change of position in that we had an anti-imperialist leader of the Labour Party, and in Jeremy Corbyn we had someone who made it very clear that he personally was opposed to Islamophobia. But we didn’t have the expulsion of the Henry Jackson society from the parliamentary Labour Party, which is a right-wing, Neo-conservative Islamophobic group. We still have many Labour MPs who are a member of that group. We didn’t have tackling of these narratives around grooming gangs and Muslims sort of being out to sexually abuse white women. So we didn’t have any of these sort of things being tackled under Jeremy Corbyn unfortunately.

    And now we’re in a position with Keir Starmer, where we’ve had a sort of an extreme pivot back to the days of New Labour. And actually, I think it’s probably even worse than that now, because he’s been indulging narratives around so-called Muslim antisemitism, and has been allying himself with a very extreme Zionist, right-wing, pro-Israel groups who are also, of course, dedicated to demonising Muslims, because it’s also in their interest. And it’s in the state of Israel’s interest to promote the idea that Palestinians are terrorists, and that they want to create a sort of a radical Islamic State. 

    OK, and I believe that we are live now so thank you very much everyone and welcome. 

    Of course, we had a report in November 2020 from the Labour Muslim network, who conducted the largest survey of Muslim political opinion in the Labour Party that has ever been conducted in history. And they found in that survey that one in four Muslims in the Labour Party have directly experienced Islamophobia, that one in three Muslims in Labour party have witnessed Islamophobia, and that almost half of Muslims in the Labour Party didn’t trust the Labour Party’s complaints procedures, nor do they think that the Labour Party actually takes Islamophobia seriously. 

    And I think that was really vindicated when Keir Starmer refused to even acknowledge that report existed until two weeks after it was released. This was a bombshell report from a major Muslim group inside the Labour Party documenting some very serious things about Islamophobia. And Sir Keir Starmer, the leader of the party, didn’t even acknowledge it until two weeks later. So I don’t think Islamophobia is taken seriously in the Labour Party. And I think it has a very long history in the party.

    I think there is a hierarchy of racism in the Labour Party. In fact, I don’t even know if it’s worth describing as a hierarchy. We have a situation in which any accusation of antisemitism, whether it’s made in good faith or not, and most of these accusations are not made in good faith. They are designed to smear and target not only Muslim political activists, but Jewish, anti-Zionist, and other people who support the Palestinian Liberation cause. That’s a very cynical operation going on, and just to basically defend the State of Israel. It has nothing to do really with tackling Judeophobia, anti-Jewish prejudice. And then, on the other hand, we have Islamophobia, anti-Black racism, many other prejudices and bigotries that exists inside the Labour Party (I think Islamophobia is one of the foremost of those) not being tackled at all. Not being given any sort of seriousness. So I wouldn’t describe it as a hierarchy, I would just describe it as essentially racism isn’t taken seriously in the Labour Party. There aren’t procedures, really there, that deal with them. I don’t think the staff of the Labour Party who deal with complaints are really concerned about Islamophobia. And I think it goes right to the top. I think that the Labour Party manages to sort of coast on the idea that it’s an anti-racist party that historically has been anti-racist. Historically, it’s been a party that supported imperialism, supported colonialism, that hasn’t really been all that progressive on race issues. 

    And I think people are waking up to the fact, particularly those from Muslim and other ethnic minority backgrounds, that the Labour Party is not on their side, and that it’s not a party that’s dedicated to anti-racism.

    The Muslim vote accounts for a very large percentage of the Labour Party’s vote in many marginal seats. And I think that the Labour Party doesn’t really value Muslim votes; it does take them for granted. And I think that was demonstrated in the Batley & Spen by-election. Of course, Labour managed to just slip over the line there. But I mean, in a general election setting, we’re talking about, you know, 10s of seats potentially, in which Muslims will effectively decide the fate of that seat. 

    And I think that if the Labour Party doesn’t begin to take Islamophobia seriously and carries on not just not taking Islamophobia seriously, but actually showing active contempt towards Muslims. If it carries on in that way, then I think that it’s very, very likely that the Labour Party will end up losing many seats in the next general election on account of Muslims deciding that either they’re going to stay home, or they’re just going to vote for another party, that’s not the Labour Party.

    Please support The Canary. It’s really important that we challenge mainstream media narratives and that we support our own independent media because we’re not going to get a fair hearing in the mainstream media. We need to support our own independent media.

    By Pablo Navarrete

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • A home care chief has called for care workers to be prioritised when coronavirus (Covid-19) tests are processed, as it emerged some carers are waiting more than a week for results.

    “Patchy” and “problematic”

    Dr Jane Townson, chief executive of the Homecare Association, said this will help maintain workforce capacity amid ongoing pressures that are being exacerbated by the spread of Omicron. Examples provided by a national home care provider, which have been flagged to the government, illustrate some of the problems staff are experiencing in getting PCR test results.

    One staff member in Wimbledon, South London, who took a PCR on 23 December, was still awaiting results on 31 December.

    Another care worker in Basingstoke, Hampshire, was told to travel to Newbury in Berkshire to get a walk-in PCR test, but discovered their local centre was “completely quiet” when they supported a client to get tested.

    In North Cheshire, care staff are waiting seven days on average for PCR test results to be returned. At one point, 12 staff in this area were isolating while they awaited test results.

    Townson told the PA news agency staffing problems vary by region, with areas such as London, Lancashire, and South Cumbria “really struggling” in recent weeks.

    Dr Jane Townson, chief executive of the UK's Homecare Association (UKHCA/PA)
    Dr Jane Townson, chief executive of the UK’s Homecare Association (UKHCA/PA)

    Testing is “a big issue in the short term”, and is “really key” to keeping everything going safely, she added.

    She told PA:

    I think it’s very, very patchy it’s, it’s very regional. So places like London – very problematic. Other places are muddling along, but the staff shortages have been made worse by slow turnaround times with tests.

    So I’ve raised that multiple times with the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) – they say that health and social care workers are supposed to be prioritized in the PCR test turnaround, but there are stories of tests not coming back for five days, 10 days, seven days. And of course, all the time that the tests don’t come back, people can’t get back out to work. And of course, the difficulty obtaining lateral flow tests is problematic.

    So I’ve made the point many times to the department – that they shouldn’t announce policies without it being possible to actually implement them in practice, because it creates another whole load of issues.

    The DHSC was approached for comment.

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer has dismissed criticism of Sir Tony Blair’s knighthood, insisting the former prime minister deserves the honour. He argued that Blair was “very successful” as PM.

    In 2003, former lawyer Starmer wrote an opinion piece arguing that the invasion of Iraq would be “unlawful”.

    Sirs of a feather

    More than half a million people have signed a petition calling for Blair’s appointment by the Queen to the Order of the Garter – the oldest and most senior British Order of Chivalry – to be rescinded over his domestic record and the Iraq War. Starmer insisted the honour is not a “thorny” issue and that Blair had been a “very successful prime minister”.

     

    A petition calling for Blair to be stripped of the honour had been signed by more than 544,000 people by the morning of 4 January. Claiming to “respect” the views of those signing the petition while simultaneously dismissing them, Starmer argued  on ITV’s Good Morning Britain:

    I don’t think it’s thorny at all; I think he deserves the honour. Obviously I respect the fact that people have different views.

    I understand there are strong views on the Iraq War. There were back at the time and there still are, but that does not detract from the fact that Tony Blair was a very successful prime minister of this country and made a huge difference to the lives of millions of people in this country.

    During another policy-free reboot of his vision for the UK on 4 January, Starmer claimed that Blair made “made Britain a better country”. He did not comment on whether Blair made Iraq or Afghanistan ‘better countries’:

    The Breakthrough Party summed up Starmer’s speech:

    “Two cheeks”

    Starmer’s intervention has been slammed online:

    “The least deserving person”

    The petition to strip Blair of his knighthood is approaching 600,000 signatories at the time of writing. It reads:

    Tony Blair caused irreparable damage to both the constitution of the United Kingdom and to the very fabric of the nation’s society. He was personally responsible for causing the death of countless innocent, civilian lives and servicement in various conflicts. For this alone he should be held accountable for war crimes.

    Tony Blair is the least deserving person of any public honour

    Meanwhile, Blair’s knighthood has exposed everything’s that wrong about Britain:

    Featured image via Pete Birkinshaw – Wikimedia

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • Public services are resorting to emergency plans to mitigate staff shortages caused by the Omicron variant of coronavirus.

    Ongoing issues

    At least six hospital trusts have declared critical incidents – where priority services may be under threat. Boris Johnson said on 3 January that he would “make sure that we look after our NHS any way that we can”. The education secretary said schools should be prepared to merge classes into large groups if staff levels dipped too low.

    Health leaders, meanwhile, warned the health service was “in a state of crisis”, and a headteacher predicted remote learning could return if school staff were struck down with the virus.

    The Daily Telegraph reported that up to 10 million “critical” workers would be able to access coronavirus (Covid-19) tests through their employers, after days of complaints that they could not be ordered online and stocks in pharmacies were patchy.

    In the meantime Chris Hopson, chief executive of NHS Providers, which represents health trusts, said “a number of trusts across country have declared internal critical incidents over the last few days”.

    One of those was United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust, where “extreme and unprecedented” staff shortages were expected to result in “compromised care”.

    Coronavirus – Mon Jan 3, 2022
    People queue outside a vaccination clinic at the Glasgow Central Mosque (Jane Barlow/PA)

    “Critical incident”

    Chief executive of University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay Aaron Cummins confirmed in a statement that the trust had declared an “internal critical incident”. In an internal message from Cummins shared on Twitter, he told staff that “sadly, despite everyone’s best efforts, many of our patients are still receiving a level of care and experience that falls below the level of standards we would like”.

    Meanwhile, Geoff Barton, general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders, said:

    It’s hard to imagine that if the NHS is being affected, that retail is being affected, if sporting fixtures are being affected, it’s hard to see why you wouldn’t in schools and colleges have the same issues around staff shortages.

    Bin collections and train services have also been hit.

    A further 157,758 lab-confirmed coronavirus cases were recorded in England and Scotland as of 9am on 3 January, the government said. Scotland saw its highest number of daily cases yet. The government also said a further 42 people had died in England within 28 days of testing positive for coronavirus.

    Separate figures published by the Office for National Statistics show there have now been 174,000 deaths registered in the UK where coronavirus was mentioned on the death certificate.

    Schools return

    Some pupils returned to the classroom on 4 January with new advice to wear masks in the classroom. The move has been recommended for secondary school pupils in England, alongside testing twice a week.

    Education secretary Nadhim Zahawi said:

    What we’re saying is, look, with Omicron, because it’s so infectious, we want to make sure that we give you as many tools to be able to make sure that education is open.

    He added:

    This is an aerosol-transmitted virus and if you’re wearing a mask, if you’re asymptomatic, then you’re less likely to infect other people.

    It is hoped the return of masks may prevent the need to disrupt children’s education further.

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • Households can expect to take a “seismic” hit to their energy bills which could force some to decide whether to eat or heat their homes, according to a consumer expert.

    Crisis Britain

    Money Saving Expert founder Martin Lewis said the government must intervene now to avoid a crisis in the energy market. He told the PA news agency:

    This year is going to be a very tough year for many people. The energy price crisis needs substantial intervention from the Government.

    We are going to see a minimum 50% increase in energy prices in the system and that is unsustainable for many.

    Martin Lewis
    Martin Lewis has warned soaring energy bills will create huge problems this year (Jeff Overs/PA)

    The government’s energy price cap is due to be revised in February, with the increase put onto customers’ bills from April. According to Cornwall Insights, an energy sector specialist, bills could rise from £1,277 a year under the current price cap to £1,865 a year when the next revision is announced, a rise of 46%.

    They also predict it could spike to £2,240 a year at the following quarterly revaluation in August 2022 without a significant fall in energy prices globally.

    Lewis said:

    We need to look at what we can do now and how we can protect those people who will need to choose between heating and eating. There are already some who are having to make that choice. We need to look at the whole structure of the energy market.

    The Government didn’t intervene early enough so we’re all paying for the market collapses we’re seeing.

    Collapse

    Several firms went bust in 2021, with customers at other energy firms picking up the tab for the collapses, whilst the government also took over the running of Bulb after it failed last November. Ofgem has subsequently announced changes to how much other energy firms, and eventually customers, can be forced to pay to fund rivals’ collapses.

    Lewis added that there needs to be greater protection for the most vulnerable, who may not be able to shop around for the best deals, or may be stuck on more expensive pre-payment options.

    He said:

    What’s coming in April is a seismic hit for fuel bills which is going to be astronomical. The Government has been meeting the energy industry but they’ve not been meeting the consumer groups. Certainly, I’ve not heard of any taking place.

    They have to sort this now because if we leave this before it’s too late it will be a disaster.

    A government spokesperson said:

    Protecting consumers is our top priority which is why our Energy Price Cap will remain in place.

    We are also supporting vulnerable and low-income households further through initiatives such as the £500 million Household Support Fund, Warm Home Discount, Winter Fuel Payments and Cold Weather Payments. Domestic fuels such as gas and electricity are also already subject to the reduced rate of 5% of VAT.

    Re-nationalise it

    The situation has led to talk of nationalisation, albeit not from the Conservative or Labour parties. In September 2021, Keir Starmer actually made it clear that Labour would not re-nationalise the failing sector despite how popular such a move would likely be.

    Writing in the i newspaper, a Bulb employee said of nationalisation:

    The fact that the company’s continued operations are being paid for by the UK government shows how straightforward the process could be

    They also noted:

    Since the privatisation of the energy sector back in 1990, energy companies have funnelled billions of pounds back to private shareholders. Since then, the price people pay for their energy bills has continued to increase despite the argument that a privatised energy sector would be more efficient and therefore cheaper

    And they added:

    The decisions made in the last week, where Bulb’s continued operations will be paid for by the UK government – via a “special administrator” – shows how straightforward nationalisation could be. We can look to the temporarily nationalised Eastern Railway as an example of how this could work. In the five years that the railway was nationalised and run by the Department for Transport, the railway generated £1 billion for the UK taxpayer. A nationalised Bulb, run by the Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy, could focus on ensuring Bulb members aren’t negatively affected and have an initial aim of becoming profitable. If a nationalised Bulb continued to operate for the next 10 years, how much could it earn for the taxpayer? Initially, it could repay any debts accrued throughout this winter. Any further income generated could be re-invested to upgrade cold, drafty homes, making them both warm and affordable.

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • Prince Charles pays tribute to human rights defenders

    On 2 January 2022 AFP reported that Britain’s Prince Charles urged people in a New Year message to “take a moment” to recognise those “standing up for freedom and human rights” around the world.

    The heir to the throne paid tribute to people in places such as Afghanistan, Syria and Myanmar facing political and religious persecution and insecurity alongside increasingly dire humanitarian situations.

    As we start a New Year, we might take a moment to remember the many people around the world who are standing up for freedom and human rights,” he said on Saturday.

    In the face of such adversity, incredibly brave individuals, local communities and international organisations are responding to great needs by providing vital assistance.

    I pray for peaceful resolutions to these conflicts and that we might all be blessed with the courage to support those in need, wherever they may be.”

    https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/921817-prince-charles-pays-tribute-to-human-rights-defenders

    This post was originally published on Hans Thoolen on Human Rights Defenders and their awards.

  • The fossil fuel industry says it wants to be part of the solution to the climate crisis. Despite this, it’s busy trying to ensure it can exploit new parts of the Earth for more fossil fuels, with the staunch backing of governments.

    An image from a recent disaster in Nigeria shows what a dangerous path that would be to follow, especially for a world in the grips of two existential crises: climate and biodiversity.

    Utter disaster

    As the Health of Mother Earth Foundation (HOMEF) detailed in a report, an oil well blowout occurred on 1 November. It explained that:

    A blowout occurs whenever there is the release of uncontrollable oil and gas from an oil well or gas well after all pressure control systems fail.

    The November blowout happened at a well in an oilfield operated by Aiteo Eastern Exploration and Exploration Company in Bayelsa state. The spill wasn’t “top killed“, meaning plugged, until 8 December. HOMEF’s director Nnimmo Bassey posted an image on Twitter on 22 December that showed what those weeks of constantly spurting crude oil and fossil gas has done to the environment where the well is situated:

    As Bassey’s tweet highlighted, an investigation into the cause of the blowout is now underway.

    The HOMEF report said that such spills can ‘largely destroy’ the socio-economic wellbeing of people, who mainly rely on fishing and small-scale farming, where they occur. It continued, noting that spills can have:

    direct impacts on human health due to the heavy metals in the oil. Elements such as lead, cadmium, arsenic and mercury pose special health impacts, causing cancers, kidney failures, reproductive problems, birth defects and many others.

    Ecocide

    The report also asserted that the Aiteo spill has destroyed “immense tracts” of the Santa Barbara river’s mangrove forests, with their “heavily crude oil-soiled” roots exposed at low tide. It suggested that the mangrove swamps would likely have a “heavy presence of the polluting crude oil”, which would mean “that aquatic lives like periwinkle, crayfish, crabs, oysters and even fish would be wiped out”.

    HOMEF further noted that despite the company deploying booms that are meant to stem the spread of the oil, a “large volume of the crude oil was flowing out to the Santa Barbara River and spreading towards the Ocean”.

    Alarm bells

    Nigeria is, of course, no stranger to such disasters after six decades of exploitation for hydrocarbons. Neither are other countries where fossil fuel companies have operated. Attorney Steven Donziger, who is well known for his legal battle with oil giant Chevron, tweeted:

    But their ongoing experience should serve as an alarm bell for governments elsewhere that are currently being seduced by the fossil fuel industry’s charms.

    As HOMEF said, some blowouts are near impossible to control, due to the level of force involved or where they happen. Imagine then, if such a disaster were to occur in Namibia and Botswana, where ReconAfrica is engaged in exploring for oil? As The Canary has previously reported, its project could impact a watershed called the Okavango Delta. Those waters support the lives of tens of thousands of people, unfathomable numbers of wild animals, and huge amounts of vegetation.

    Bassey previously wrote that the ReconAfrica project is a “gamble” that risks turning the Okavango region “into an arena of death”. The image he posted on Twitter illustrates with sobering clarity exactly what that ‘death’ looks like.

    Destruction, every step of the way

    As legal action currently underway in South Africa shows, fossil fuel projects aren’t solely risky to people and the environment once they’re operational. A number of environmental groups and communities in the country are currently fighting to halt the seismic testing Shell is conducting along the Wild Coast. They argue, backed by scientific expertise, that the testing poses risks to sea life and people.

    Companies conduct seismic surveys to assess what oil and gas may lie under the ocean floor. In Shell’s case, it involves blasting the ocean with sound pulses on a regular basis over a period of months. The recorded feedback from those blasts will indicate the presence of fossil fuels or not.

    Groups have mounted two legal challenges against the testing. Natural Justice and other environmental and human rights-focused groups filed an urgent interdict application at the end of November. A judge heard that case on 1 December. He ruled against the applicants on 3 December, on the grounds that they hadn’t proven that the survey would do “irreparable harm” to marine life. The groups have applied to appeal the judgment.

    Wild Coast community members and groups filed a further urgent interdict in early December. A judge heard that case on 17 December. The judgment is currently pending.

    Irreparable harm

    The cases have variably accused Shell of moving forward with the surveys without the correct environmental authorisations and failing to meaningfully consult with affected communities. They have also asserted that the surveys threaten harm, including harm that could be irreparable and substantial, to communities and wildlife.

    In the case of the latter issue, Shell has argued that it has mitigation measures in place to minimise harm to ocean life. However, expert opinion presented in the second case characterised these measures as inadequate on a number of levels. Current scientific evidence shows that seismic surveys widely and negatively impact ocean ecosystems, from tiny organisms like zooplankton to large mammals such as whales.

    Moreover, Shell is ultimately carrying out these surveys in the hope it can drill the Wild Coast for fossil fuels. During a Daily Maverick webinar on the situation, conservation strategist at the South African Association for Marine Biological Research, Judy Mann-Lang, explained the risks of this. She highlighted that the Wild Coast hosts an extremely powerful current called the Agulhas Current. Mann-Lang warned:

    Our concern is that if oil or gas is found there, how are they going to extract it safely, given the incredible powerful current washing down that coast? How are they going to mitigate the risks of this current? What happens if something goes wrong? They don’t know. Predicting this current is difficult. It is not called the Wild Coast for nothing.

    Dinosaurs

    In a world already grappling with immense environmental crises, it is beyond comprehension that authorities would wilfully put further vital ecosystems – and all the living beings who depend on them – at risk in pursuit of more planet-burning fossil fuels. Shell, however, doesn’t appear to see things that way. During the first court hearing, its counsel argued [1:56.15] that “in matters like this”, namely “where there are allegations about harm to the environment”, there’s a “subtext” that:

    the commercial interests of private companies, and this is frankly especially companies with a big international footprint like Shell, must just yield to the supposed environmental interests or the interests of the public

    As a dinosaur of the fossil fuel era, Shell may not be used to having to ‘yield’ to the interests of life on Earth. But in our current catastrophic reality, continued life on Earth is not guaranteed at all, in no small part because of the actions of the fossil fuel industry.

    So if we’re to have a hope in hell of turning the tide, life simply must take priority over money and profit.

    Featured image via Reuters / Youtube

    By Tracy Keeling

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • 2021 was a year of decline and reorganisation for the British military. It was also a year when historical war crimes allegations resurfaced, secrecy was expanded and a major defeat became undeniable. We decided to look back over some of the key themes in military affairs which emerged over the year.

    This article is another in The Year In Review series. You’ll be able to catch up on the many of the other review articles here.

    Cut and run

    The Afghanistan occupation finally ground to an end as the Taliban took Kabul in August. Bringing to an end 20 years of military occupation. While generals maintained the military had never been defeated, the rapid and messy withdrawal told another story. The narrative around the chaos of the pull-out was being revised even as it happened. Mainstream media focus was on ‘human interest’ – namely via images of soldiers carrying children and a bizarre story about an evacuation of dogs.

    The defeat caused major dissonance, with the guilty nations arguing about who was to blame for failure. And one Tory MP even arguing that Afghanistan should be reinvaded. The government was less keen, however, on a proper inquiry into the disaster.

    War crimes

    Yet the real face of British military operations did peek through. Allegations of war crimes in Afghanistan, this time by SAS troops, re-surfaced again. The allegations included that in 2011 special forces troops murdered 17 people over a two day period during house raids in Afghanistan. And that key documents relating to the cases were kept hidden by the military. One senior officer was quoted as saying of the alleged killings:

     I find it depressing it has come to this. Ultimately a massive failure of leadership.

    Ireland

    And Britain’s violent history in Ireland also reared its head. Former soldier Dennis Hutchings died while on trial for the Troubles-era killing of John Pat Cunningham, a disabled man from Country Tyrone. At the last minute, the military u-turned under pressure from veterans groups and former Tory minister Johnny Mercer on Hutchings’s funeral. They allowed him to be buried with military honours on Remembrance Day.

    And it looks as if the British establishment is attempting to rewrite the British military’s record in Ireland. In November, a Tory MP announced that the Ireland occupation would also be given an official history. The aim: to provide an official version of the conflict which favoured the British.

    Accountable?

    2021 also saw military secrecy deepened. Parts of the military were reorganised into new ‘Ranger’ regiments in November. Meaning that over 1,000 troops will now be protected from Freedom of Information requests and parliamentary questions. The Canary was ahead of the game on this, first warning of the threat to accountability in March 2021.

    Military chief general Nick Carter tastefully chose Remembrance to announce that the UK needed an army of killer robots. Clearly, another step away from accountability and towards less accountable military operations. And November also saw a new head of the military, admiral Tony Radakin, lay out his dystopian vision of future warfare. Central to his strategy: more deployments and deeper integration between the military and arms firms.

    Overseas Operations Bill

    Another major story in 2021 was the Overseas Operations Bill. The Bill aimed to stop investigations into alleged crimes by UK troops. As The Canary reported critics included everyone from the Quakers to the Royal British Legion.

    While top military lawyer Hilary Meredith warned that, far from protecting troops, the bill would strip personnel of their ability to hold the MOD to account:

    It is totally unacceptable for the Government to legislate to deny those who put their lives on the line for our country overseas the same employer liability rights as the UK civilians they defend. The section must be scrapped – it clearly breaches the Armed Forces Covenant.

    However, due to the large Tory majority the bill passed despite substantial criticism from outside parliament in April 2021.

    Fightback

    However, the military and warmongers didn’t get it all their own way. A special statue of a soldier went up in Margate to highlight the disaster of British foreign policy. The Tories were roundly mocked for trying to hide, well, everything behind the Union Jack. And over the pond, ex-US president George W Bush found one of his public events had been penetrated by an angry Iraq war veteran who demanded he account for his crimes.

    In 2022, the fight against war and militarism will continue. And The Canary will be there to report on it.

    Featured image – Wikimedia Commons/Cpl Rebecca Brown.

    By Joe Glenton

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • “I am the lucky one”, the co-chair of the Democratic Society Congress (DTK) tells us, “I’m an MP so I have immunity”. But he will still face charges. Everyone else around the table has either been to prison, is in the middle of a trial, or is facing prison sentences.

    This isn’t exceptional. It is the norm in Bakur (North Kurdistan – the Kurdish majority region of Turkey). In every meeting we go to, in every interview we conduct, eventually we discuss what sentences people are facing or have already served.

    Everyone is charged with “membership of a terrorist organisation”. But these are not terrorists. These are lawyers, journalists, MPs, co-op members, and human rights activists. Their crime is being Kurdish and supporting radical democracy in the face of president Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s fascistic regime.

    And while this is nothing new – ever since my first trip to the region in 2011 as an election monitor, I’ve been struck by the fact that there is no safe position to take if you support the Kurdish struggle and oppose the ruling government – there are signs things are getting worse.

    This was my sixth trip to Bakur since 2011. Several friends I’ve met on previous trips are now in prison, are under investigation, or have escaped the country. This most recent delegation was made up of radical journalists, including three of us from The Canary, the Kurdistan Solidarity Network, and defendant and prisoner solidarity organisations. Our aims were to learn from a struggle that inspires us politically, to connect our work, and to amplify the voices of those facing constant repression from the Turkish state.

    Gentrification

    There are signs in Amed (Diyarbakir) that the Turkish state is feeling more confident. In the old city of Sur, small, out of reach Turkish flags and pictures of Erdoğan – who appears to love having his face on every lamppost – have been replaced by bigger banners. Most of the police cordons have gone. There is no longer an armored car parked permanently on the corner of one of the main squares.

    In 2015, residents of Sur declared autonomy. The Turkish state responded with deadly force. Eliza Egret and Tom Anderson reported on the situation in Red Pepper in 2016:

    The police and military are using every kind of violence against the Kurds. They are using tanks and heavy armoured vehicles. They have flattened houses, historical places, mosques. They use helicopters and technological weapons, night vision binoculars and drones. They don’t let families get to the bodies of youths who were killed. Corpses remain on the streets for weeks.

    As people on several trips have told me, the Turkish state also used the excuse to bulldoze the area and concrete over evidence of the war crimes committed. Old houses have been replaced with new builds. Those displaced were given less than market value prices for their homes and are unable to afford to move into the new houses the government has built. This was deliberate. Erdoğan wants to change the make-up of Sur. I’m told that government officials, police, and military are all given discounts if they want to buy these new houses.

    During my last trip in February 2020, these new builds were still closed to public access. We could only view them from the city’s historic walls or through gaps in fences. Now they’re open. But they’re eerily quiet. Row upon row of empty houses and deserted streets. A literal ghost town when you know the horrors that have been concreted over to create them.

    There are other signs of gentrification around Sur. New cafes have opened up; a once bombed-out deserted hotel is now open and boasts a Starbucks. A massive poster for Burger King is displayed on one of the main streets. As one person tells me, these are all ways in which the Turkish state is trying to crush the spirit of Sur. But despite years of war, curfew, displacement, and now gentrification, that spirit is still strong.

    Force still dominates

    While the military and police presence is diminished, it’s still felt and impossible to ignore. One night, walking back to our hotel, we see a police operation with a balaclava-clad man wielding a semi-automatic on a street corner. On another night, two of our delegation are stopped and searched by the police. No explanation is given. Local residents tell us this is just what happens when people are out at night.

    These are just minor glimpses into the everyday reality for people who live in the region. Erdoğan might be trying various tactics to eradicate Kurdish resistance, but sheer force still dominates.

    The power of women

    Women’s rights are central to the Kurdish Freedom Movement. As I wrote after attending a TJA (Free Women’s Movement) conference in Amed in 2020:

    There’s a women’s revolution taking place in the Middle East. Not just in Rojava (the mostly Kurdish part of northern Syria), where images and stories of the brilliant and brave female fighters against Daesh (Isis/Isil) have captured international headlines, but in Bakur too. Under the increasingly dictatorial and fascistic government of Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, women’s rights are being eroded at a national level. In January, for example, a so-called “marry-your-rapist” bill was introduced, meaning men who rape women can avoid punishment by marrying their victims. Meanwhile, women are regularly attacked with the police showing little interest in investigating.

    But women are fighting back. And the Kurdish women’s movement is at the forefront of this fightback. Lipservice isn’t just paid to women’s equality in the Kurdish freedom movement; equality isn’t something that can be sorted after other struggles are won – it’s a central foundation that is visible in every aspect of organising. And it shows. Not just with the women at the conference but in the movement’s political structures. The HDP (Peoples’ Democratic Party) has ‘co-chairs’ to ensure there’s equal representation for women across the party.

    The Turkish state is scared of the power of women. The TJA states that its “first target was the women’s foundations”. Ayşe Gökkan, the former spokesperson of the TJA, was sentenced to 30 years in prison in October. She was prevented from defending herself in Kurdish at her trial. Former HDP MP and DTK co-chair Leyla Güven was sentenced to 22 years in prison in December 2020.

    One of the women we met this time at the TJA had just been released from nine years in prison; another had served a six-year sentence.

    “If you are Kurdish the way is the prison”, they tell us. This is certainly a sentiment Ayşe would agree with. When we last interviewed her in the gardens of the DTK offices – offices now closed by the state – she told us:

    Prisons in Kurdistan have a special importance in our history of resistance. Prisons became education centres because so many people were imprisoned. Our resistance started in the jails. The people inside the jails started to organise the people outside the jails.

    However, the TJA tell us the situation is worse for women:

    The system is male dominant and that affects the cases. We have male friends and we are in the same struggle but because the system is male dominant we’re accused of being women and Kurdish while they are just accused of being Kurdish. That’s why it’s more hard for women. The women’s punishment is always more than men. The decisions are not equal with the law. They give decisions depending on the political situation. women are faced with lots of abuse, some faced with sexual abuse, torture, some other political intimidation. We have friend who is sentenced and faced with sexual abuse in prison.

    Prison repression

    The Turkish state is also trying to crush this prison resistance. At a prisoner solidarity organisation, we are told that Erdoğan is experimenting with different types of prisons to see which one works best, including increasing isolation for prisoners. The government is currently undertaking a massive prison expansion plan, spending billions despite the economy collapsing. The TJA tells us that women are punished for Kurdish dancing and singing.

    While we’re in Amed, we hear of the death of Garibe Gezer. Garibe committed suicide after being sexually assaulted and held in a padded cell. But as people make clear to us, she was killed by the Turkish state. This was reiterated in a statement made outside the Bar Association by the HDP, the Democratic Regions Party, Peace Mothers, and Lawyers for Freedom Association:

    We have lost Garibe as a result of the penal execution system, which is established with the aim of full isolation and killing every day, and its practices and as a result of the physical-sexual assaults.

    Release sick prisoners

    Other campaigns are focussing on the condition of sick prisoners. On the day we attend a press conference for sick prisoners at the Bar Association, we hear news that two died on 15 December. Both had cancer. According to data from the Human Rights Association, there are currently 1,605 ill prisoners in jail, with 604 of them classed as “seriously sick”. Since the start of 2020, 59 prisoners have died of their illness.

    HDP spokesperson Ebru Günay described the situation:

    The prisons of a country are the mirrors of their democracy. Unfortunately, the prisons of Turkey have turned into houses of death. Only in the last week, two ill prisoners have lost their lives in prison.

    People are also campaigning for the release of Aysel Tuğluk. Aysel has been in prison since 2016 and has dementia. She is:

    the first woman who co-chaired a political party in the history of Kurdish political parties and the only woman who faced a political ban as she was banned from politics after the Democratic Society Party was closed. She is also a lawyer, a human rights defender and a politician who has devoted her whole life to the Kurds’ struggle for freedom and equality that will culminate in an honorable peace.

    Despite her illness, and an independent medical report saying she should be released, she is still imprisoned. People are ensuring she is not alone, though, as the statement made outside the Bar Association makes clear:

    Aysel Tuğluk or all other captives are not alone. There is a powerful women’s organization behind them. Women’s solidarity and unity will keep on defending the politics of keeping alive.

    Resistance is life

    There’s a saying in Kurdish – resistance is life – berxwedan jiyane – and despite the sadness, despite the repression, this spirit was still evident in every meeting. Despite decades of repression, people are not only still fighting back, but they are fighting for a radically democratic, anti-capitalist, and pro-feminist society.

    And while we’re a long way from facing the excesses of the Turkish state in the UK, we are facing the most draconian crackdown on dissent we’ve seen in generations. Our friends are in prison for fighting back against police violence. On 17 December, Ryan Roberts was sentenced to 14 years in prison for the 21 March Kill The Bill demo in Bristol. He will spend a decade behind bars. As Tom Anderson wrote in The Canary:

    Ryan – along with his fellow demonstrators – fought back against the police’s violence, racism, and misogyny. The actions of the demonstrators on 21 March were part of the same struggle as the actions of people fighting back against state violence around the world, and we should be proud of them.

    The police bill will criminalise many more of us. The struggles are different, but there are many parallels.

    These struggles will continue. And whether it’s fighting back against our increasingly authoritarian UK state or standing in solidarity with our Kurdish comrades, our struggles are connected, and international solidarity is powerful.

    Resistance is life.

    Featured image via The Canary

    By Emily Apple

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • For much of the last 20 or so years, the north of Ireland wasn’t used to being front and centre in international headlines. But thanks to the DUP and other hardline Brexiteers, that’s exactly where it was as 2021 began. And thanks also to a Brexiteer Tory government, the north made headlines for another reason. This time for the conflict that, largely speaking, fell silent in 1998.

    As I’ve written extensively for The Canary, the peace we’ve had in the north in the last 23 years has been an uneasy one. Part of what makes it so uneasy is the tin ear the British government gives to victims’ families.

    The government’s insensitivity and deafness was especially loud and clear in July. Because that was the month secretary of state for Northern Ireland Brandon Lewis confirmed plans for an amnesty that could see British forces evade justice for their crimes in Ireland. And not only that, as if to consolidate its vision of the past, in November the British government announced plans to rewrite the history of that conflict. The Telegraph said the government feared “creeping revisionism around the role of the IRA and the atrocities it committed”. Oh the irony!

    However, regardless of Britain’s tactic to conceal its dirty past in Ireland, the families of those who died at Britain’s hands have not relented. They continued their pursuit of justice for their loved ones into 2021. And it’s their bravery, not the callousness of the UK government, that will be the lasting memory and message of legacy issues in 2021. This article is another in The Year In Review series. You’ll be able to catch up on the many of the other review articles here.

    But it was Labour which was first up

    The year actually began with an example of historical revisionism from the Labour Party. This was evident when then shadow secretary of state for Northern Ireland Louise Haigh ran an online “education programme” about the 1998 Good Friday peace agreement.

    Haigh invited professor Jon Tonge from the University of Liverpool to address her first seminar. According to Tonge, the conflict began at the collapse of the 1973 Sunningdale agreement. Sunningdale was an attempt at power-sharing in the north which collapsed after five months following British loyalist opposition.

    As I wrote at the time, in addition to ignoring the first five years of the conflict, Tonge completely omitted Irish republican concerns and the violent British repression against Irish Catholics and republicans. Republican paramilitaries – as they’d wanted since the war of independence over one hundred years ago – were fighting for a united Ireland. Tonge also ignored that the 30-year conflict was in part born out of the repression, by the British state and its agents, of peaceful protests in 1968.

    Blood soaked journey

    In March, when Connla Young of the Irish News revealed the “blood-soaked journey” of a British loyalist gun, it revealed a double standard in the mainstream media’s reporting on the north. Loyalists imported that gun, along with many others, to murder Irish republicans and innocent Catholics during the conflict.

    Unfortunately, though, Young’s journalism is an exception in the mainstream. Because his colleagues don’t display an ounce of his courage. Instead they portray today’s loyalists who oppose the current post-Brexit arrangements in the north, as an “umbrella group”. Lobbyists, if you will. Yet these loyalist groups are a direct descendant of the gangs, who once acted as the death squads of the British state. But this hasn’t stopped the mainstream media giving them pride of place. What did the Telegraph say about “revisionism”?

    As they admit one, another resurfaces

    In May, a coroner declared 9 of the 11 Ballymurphy massacre victims, shot by the British army, were innocent. Victims’ families already knew this just as they knew all 11 were innocent. These innocent people died following the invasion of over 600 British soldiers into the Ballymurphy area of west Belfast between the 9 and 11 August 1971. This British invasion marked the beginning of the British policy of imprisoning Irish Catholics and republicans without trial – internment.

    Following the coroner’s announcement, we were reminded how Ballymurphy was far from a one off. Thanks to the relentless diligence of legacy researchers at Paper Trail, new evidence indicates “a major British military operation about to begin in the vicinity”, at the time 13-year-old schoolgirl Martha Campbell was murdered in May 1972. But with this proposed amnesty in place, would anybody face trial?

    Tories make their crimes official

    Never believe anything until it has been officially denied, goes the adage. Well, the Tories weren’t denying anything as such, they just don’t want anyone to talk about British crimes in Ireland.

    In July, a series of announcements came that amounted to a denial of any wrong-doing. In early July, the Public Prosecution Service (PPS) announced it would drop the cases against two British soldiers for the murder of three Irish people in Derry in 1972. The PPS claimed there wasn’t a reasonable chance of either soldier being prosecuted.

    Later that month, Lewis announced plans to grant an amnesty to British forces, and paramilitary groups, who fought in the 30-year conflict. As I wrote at that time:

    And while some in the mainstream media, and Labour party leader Keir Starmer, say Lewis’s proposal means an amnesty “for terrorists”, the reality is quite different. Because given the lack of prosecutions compared to the eventual admission of wrong-doing by the British establishment, it looks as if the British establishment is trying to whitewash its record during that 30-year conflict.

    The British state continued to white-wash when it met with a human rights group who represent victims’ of British state violence, soon after Lewis’s announcement. From that meeting it seemed as if the British government was, at best, trying to minimise its role in the conflict in Ireland. It claimed British security forces were only responsible “for around 10% of Troubles-related deaths” and that “the vast majority… were lawful”. A state of complete and deliberate denial.

    Human rights groups continued to call out the British establishment’s lies through their research and a day of nation-wide action in Ireland in September.

    Tireless campaigning

    It is without doubt thanks to the tireless campaigning of a dedicated few that the British cover up campaign will never be normalised. We were reminded of this throughout the year and especially every December when we remember the 15 people murdered as a result of the McGurk’s Bar bombing in Belfast in 1971. Campaigners continue to expose Britain’s role in this bloody act of slaughter, and its role in deliberately and falsely blaming Irish republicans for the carnage.

    So it’s somewhat fitting, if not poignant, that the year ended with the UK Supreme Court highlighting a cover up relating to alleged torture in Ireland. The court found the police’s failure to investigate allegations of torture against the “hooded men” was unlawful. In 2014, the Irish state broadcaster RTÉ, showed these men had indeed been tortured by the British state. The British also replicated these torture techniques in Iraq in 2003.

    British state traumatising families

    Try as they might, the British establishment will not succeed. Because the campaign for justice goes on. And the more the British cover up, the more these campaigners fight. As such, it’s fitting that the final word should be left with them. Ciarán MacAirt of Paper Trail told The Canary that 2021 was “very much a double-edged sword”:

    The British state has re-traumatized families across these islands because of its endless threats to dismantle the Stormont House Agreement unilaterally and to enact its pernicious Legacy Bill. The British state’s mask has slipped and it wants to bury its war crimes and protect its killers whilst denying bereaved families equal access to due process of the law. The British media’s mendacity in reporting this assault on basic human rights was similarly damaging to families too.

    Nevertheless, the dignity, fortitude and bravery of these ordinary families were beacons throughout the darkness and deceit of 2021. These heroes are my highlight as they have demolished the falsehoods of a powerful state and relentlessly succeed in this state’s own courts. It is their heroism in fighting for truth and justice that has driven the British state to break international and domestic human rights law. The perfidious British state is running scared because it murdered its own citizens and covered up its crimes, but did not account for a basic human emotion – love. That is what is driving each and every family member and that is why Britain is in such trouble.

    We at The Canary look forward to highlighting that bravery and heroism in the years to come.

    Featured image via – YouTube screengrab – ThamesTv & Pixabay – TayebMEZAHDIA

    By Peadar O'Cearnaigh

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • A few weeks ago I started my big shout out and heartfelt thank you to the thousands of Canary readers and supporters across the UK and beyond. Part two of that continues today. This article is dedicated to some of the other campaigns it was my honour to help amplify this year and the campaigners I spoke with.

    As I said on 12 December, this is a mere snapshot. But it includes the kind words the people at the centre of these stories had to say about my work and that of The Canary. So, once again, in no particular order…

    Justice and prisons

    Whether it’s the serious and high profile case of Julian Assange or less well-known but important justice campaigns, The Canary covered these campaigns again in 2021. We highlighted miscarriages of justice and abuse of people inside prisons thereby doing what we could, as all journalists should, to advocate for justice.

    One case I’ve been writing about for a number of years is the shocking miscarriage of justice case known as the Craigavon Two. This is a story of two men, Brendan McConville and John Paul Wootton, from the Craigavon area in the north of Ireland. They’ve been in prison since 2009 for the killing of police officer Stephen Carroll. And they remain inside despite the evidence used to convict them being farcical.

    In July this year I wrote about Wootton’s request to move out of Maghaberry prison. However, prison authorities have denied this request. Wootton and his supporters have labelled this, as well as the prison denying Wootton the opportunities afforded to others inside, as “discrimination”. They say he fits the criteria to warrant a transfer.

    Like McConville, Wootton protests his innocence. Their campaign for justice continues and is currently with the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC). Campaigners hope the CCRC will send this case back to the Court of Appeal. Siobhán McConville, wife of Brendan McConville, said this about our coverage:

    The Canary is one of very few current affair outlets that took the step of covering my husband’s case, Brendan McConville one of the two men, known as the Craigavon two. Journalist Peadar O’Cearnaigh from the Canary, independently gave his time to extensively research the case and has since given professional, unbiased reporting of case facts. This case is not only a sensitive but also historic case and while mainstream media for many years chose to ignore it, a small selection of Journalists have covered it. I run Brendan’s campaign and The Canary has helped the campaign by its articles for me to highlight and to further raise awareness of this current Miscarriage of Justice, which was once Chaired by the late Gerry Conlon and is supported by Paddy Hill, Michael O’Brien (Cardiff 3) Patrick Maguire (Maguire 7) Éamon O’Cuív, Clare Daly, Mick Wallace, Maureen O’Sullivan, Francis Timmons many other TD’s and Councillor’s, Jengba (Joint Enterprise) Union’s and Council’s. Our campaign would like to thank Peadar O’Cearnaigh and The Canary for their continued accurate reporting of this case. Justice for the Craigavon two

    We also wrote about those imprisoned under the joint enterprise doctrine. This doctrine means you could be convicted of a crime you didn’t commit, but the court believes you had something to do with it. One such example is the case of Osime Brown as highlighted by The Canary‘s Sophia Purdy-Moore. Grassroots campaign group Joint Enterprise Not Guilty by Association (JENGbA) believes the doctrine is “discriminatory towards working class and BAME communities”. JENGbA said this about our coverage:

    The Canary is a great alternative to the main stream media, covering topics and news that might otherwise be ignored. The Canary has featured JENGbA (Joint Enterprise Not Guilty by Association) campaign updates and news when the MSM have said they are unable to due to as they term, “there being no balance”. As a campaign about racism and injustice in the British Justice System there rarely is a balanced side. How can there be a balanced story of injustice? It is of vital importance that our stories are published, so to be featured in The Canary allows them to be shared widely on social media where we tag MPs and legal professionals into them. JENGbA is a campaign that isn’t going away so The Canary features have had a great impact in gathering further support for the campaign.

    Women’s rights

    Selma James, author of Our Time Is Now: Sex, Race, Class, and Caring for People and Planet and the Global Women’s Strike (GWS), sat down with The Canary in November to discuss her life of activism. It would be almost impossible to list the many campaigns she’s been involved in throughout her life, but she’s possibly best known for the campaign for the “unwaged” work women do “on the land, in the home, and in the community”. In any case, she describes herself as “an anti-capitalist organiser beginning with women”. In assessing The Canary‘s coverage, James said:

    We thank The Canary for its articulate non-jargon independent news which never covers for the crimes of the establishment – a rarity when so much of the media is embedded with government and their allies. In The Canary we find out about the vicious campaign to extradite journalist Julian Assange for his Wikileaks disclosures, the Royal College of Psychiatrists giving ‘Enabling Environment’ awards to prisons that torture prisoners with solitary confinement, the ethnic-cleansing of Palestinians under Israeli apartheid, and so much more. Also rare and much needed was The Canary’s determined reporting on the manufactured charges of antisemitism used by the right-wing to destroy Jeremy Corbyn and the mass movement he led. The Canary’s editorial team was targeted for their principled antiracist anti-imperialist stance and deserve all our support.

    The Women of Colour GWS added:

    News sites “biased in favour of social justice” are rare and more needed than ever. That’s why we follow The Canary — it covers issues close to our hearts, in fresh, every-day language. The article on Osime Brown’s campaign for justice is just one among many – this kind of journalism can be life-saving.  Not many media outlets take a consistent position with Palestine, a key anti-racist and human rights issue of our time. It has weathered a storm for holding onto principles. For us and many others, The Canary not only sings – it flies high.

    Amma Birth Companions

    Since 2020, The Canary has increased its coverage of Wales and Scotland. In June this year, we highlighted the cramped conditions asylum seeker women and their babies were enduring in Glasgow. Campaigners from the Roof Coalition called on the Home Office to close this accommodation and to “ensure that every baby and child in Glasgow has access to safe, suitable housing—including those in the asylum process”. Amma Birth Companions, one of the groups involved in the Roof Coalition, gave its assessment of our coverage:

    Amma Birth Companions and the other organisations involved with The Roof Coalition were grateful to receive coverage of our #FreedomToCrawl campaign in The Canary earlier this year. This exposure helped to strengthen our efforts in campaigning to take action to ensure that every baby and child in Glasgow has access to safe, suitable housing—including those in the asylum process. By amplifying the voices of marginalised groups in the public realm, we can ensure that the people we support are heard in the important issues that affect their lives. We are still working to pressure Mears and the Home Office to close the Mother & Baby Unit in Glasgow and to move mothers and their infants to more suitable accommodation within the city.

    Racial equality in Wales

    In March 2021, during the lead up to the Senedd (Welsh parliament) elections, we highlighted the amazing work of YesCymruBAME and the Race Alliance Wales (RAW). They fight against and research racism and its effects in Wales. RAW has called for societal changes to make people in racialised communities feel more comfortable in British culture.

    YesCymruBAME highlighted the disgusting treatment of Black and minority communities at the hands of the police in Wales. In our articles, we also highlighted this racism and discrimination as well as inequality against minority communities in education and public life. Leila Usmani of RAW said:

    The Canary, as an independent media outlet, is invaluable to our work for change in Wales and impacting the political agenda. Being able to have The Canary highlight our research on public and political representation in Wales gave our campaign a platform that many other mainstream media outlets do not pick up on [due to] their centrality of English news and focus. The Canary amplifies the voice of organisations in devolved nations through a credible platform, raising our agenda, not being afraid to call things as they are.

    Welsh independence

    As we approached the lead-up to the Brexit withdrawal negotiations at the end of 2020, our coverage highlighted that Boris Johnson had failed to deliver on his 2019 election promises. What a surprise! The situation further highlighted the need for Welsh independence.

    Our coverage also brought to the fore a universal theme – the housing crisis. In Wales, not only has this meant housing has become unaffordable for many, but it’s also resulted in an attack on Welsh communities and the Welsh language. This has come about following the implementation of neoliberal policies by successive Welsh and UK governments. Socialist, republican independence campaign group UNDOD said:

    In giving us a platform early on in our campaigns The Canary has been instrumental in enabling our voice to be heard and in legitimising our experiences. When raising issues with the Canary we can be confident in the portrayal of that issue.

    In its reporting of the Housing Crisis in Wales The Canary was one of the first to bring various aspects and symptoms of the crisis together.  In so doing we were able to talk about issues that were affecting our working class communities and the very real impact it was having on community life and the people of Wales.

    Undod is a very young campaign group relatively speaking to others actively campaigning on housing in Wales over the last 2 to 3 years. Groups such as Cymdeithas yr Iaith have been campaigning on the detrimental impact of holiday and second home ownership on our communities and on the Welsh Language for around 60 years. It was important for us to establish our campaign and its purpose, and to differentiate our approach from that of other campaign groups. We needed to be able to speak authentically from Undod’s perspective, The Canary allowed for that to happen.

    In its way of supporting, platforming and giving exposure The Canary has been a part of the recent wave in campaigning by the people of Wales for the people of Wales. This campaigning has been a contributor to our growing confidence as a nation and people, a confidence that can be felt in all aspects of our expression – from sports to culture, right through to our politicians. This can only be a good thing as we look forward to a future where we know, if we insist that things can be better, they might just be.

    The Welsh language

    Related to the neoliberal housing crisis is the fight to preserve the Welsh language. Language campaigners believe the two are linked because “young people [from Welsh speaking communities] are forced to move because such a large proportion of the houses are bought at inflated prices by richer people”. They say these rich people don’t have connections to the community and use these houses as holiday or second homes. Because of this, campaigners believe “the future of the Welsh language looks bleak”.

    Mabli Siriol Jones, chair of Cymdeithas yr Iaith (the Welsh Language Society) says:

    The Canary does great work in bringing attention to the issues facing communities in Wales and the Welsh language, that are often ignored by the mainstream media or treated in a tokenistic way. Diolch yn fawr / thank you to Peadar and the rest of the Canary team for giving a platform to these stories, and the communities and campaigners who are fighting for a more just future for everyone. Nadolig llawen!

    The climate crisis

    And last but certainly not least, the environment. Or rather, the attack on our environment by the forces of capitalism. The Canary’s Tracy Keeling has written extensively on the damage to nature. Myself and Tracy both attended the climate conference COP26 in Glasgow this year to add to The Canary‘s extensive coverage of the climate crisis.

    As a media outlet, we’ve also been reporting for a number of years on the campaign against the environmental damage done and financial waste created by the HS2 high-speed rail project. That includes the abusive behaviour towards protesters by HS2 security staff, police, and bailiffs.

    Again in 2021, The Canary covered this anti-HS2 campaign when protesters took on the companies financing it and went to court to protect the nature suffering from it. The campaign group HS2 Rebellion had this to say about our coverage:

    The Canary has always shown clear headedness with their reporting, and have reported facts cleanly and without bias. The Canary has brought our campaign to a wider audience. Their articles have integrity and impact.

    This fight continues…

    While that completes my personal round up on these campaigns, it’s only a very small taste of what we covered throughout 2021. You’ll be able to catch up on the many of the other Year in Review articles here.

    So once again, thank you all for supporting independent media outlets such as The Canary. You’ve no idea how much this helps the campaigns and helps us. It plays such important part in the job of tackling the inequality that faces us all. So thank you for 2021 and here’s to 2022 – another year in progressing the struggle for a fair society.

    Featured image via YouTube Screengrab – Channel 4 News

    By Peadar O'Cearnaigh

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • It’s been a year of turmoil and trauma for all of us. This has been acutely the case for the NHS and its staff. With the Tory government at the helm, our health service has lurched from government-induced crisis to government-induced crisis. But despite all this, NHS workers have kept saving us as they’ve fought back against the Tories.

    A long, dark winter

    January started the year as it ended up going on: with health workers protesting against the Tory government right outside Downing Street. They called on Boris Johnson to resign – a running theme for much of 2021. As lockdown continued, ambulance workers were at breaking point; it was reported that a quarter of doctors had sought mental health support during the pandemic, and NHS staff pay became a big issue

    February saw a raft of stories from The Canary on mental health: from the government’s appointment of a “celebrity” ambassador to the crisis in services. The soon-to-be-gone Matt Hancock repeatedly hit the headlines – firstly on upcoming reforms (more on that later) and also over dodgy pandemic contracts and PPE. Of course, Hancock would hit the headlines later in the year for something else entirely.

    Spring offering little hope

    NHS pay back in the spotlight in early March, with the Tories not budging on their appalling 1% offered. Protests ensued, with the state fining one of the organisers £10,000 for allegedly breaking coronavirus rules. The public got behind workers’ disgust with a slow, public clap. But, in true Keir Starmer fashion, Labour’s stance on NHS pay was dire. It supported “at least” a 2.1% rise for NHS staff and incurred the wrath of worker-led groups like NHS Workers Say No.

    April saw vaccine passports being discussed, with the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) raising concerns. We know know those concerns fell on deaf government ears. One of the biggest stories from The Canary that month was our investigation into “VIP lanes” for government PPE contracts. Leaked emails proved they existed. And moreover, they showed the relationships between suppliers and people at the heart of government. You can read our investigation here.

    A summer of protest

    In May, NHS waiting lists hit record highs, and this wouldn’t be the last time we read that headline. The nurse who looked after Boris Johnson as he lay in hospital with coronavirus quit – delivering a stinging parting shot at him and his government in the process. Also, the Tories tried to start selling off our GP records to the highest bidder. Since then the programme has been paused.

    June was Hancock’s month, because he was forced to quit when it emerged he broke coronavirus rules while having an affair with an aide. Enter Sajid Javid to take his place.

    Of course, it was the NHS’s birthday in July, with people celebrating as they rightly should have: staging protests. This theme continued for the rest of the summer – with The Canary on the frontline of some of the demos. This included us supporting NHS Workers Say No (and a certain Jeremy Corbyn) when they handed in a huge petition over NHS pay to Downing Street. At this point, the government had still only offered NHS staff a 3% increase. And the row over this would continue for the rest of 2021.

    NHS Workers and Jeremy Corbyn outside Downing Street

    Autumn: falling leaves, falling morale

    September and October saw the Tories’ Health and Care Bill take centre stage. This legislation would see them be able to accelerate the privatisation of the NHS. As Canary guest author Dr Phil Bevin wrote for us, the bill:

    threatens to introduce Integrated Care Systems (ICS) to the NHS. Integrated Care Systems will ensure that NHS England will share the responsibility of health service provision with councils and, most worryingly, private companies. The legislation will also further dilute our legal right to healthcare. It will do this by removing the NHS’s “statutory duty” to arrange hospital medical services.

    The furious debate over the bill continued. There was also talk of the government’s lacklustre pandemic response causing the NHS to collapse in winter. NHS Workers Say No were once more at the forefront of the debate – calling out Javid for saying the pressure on the NHS at that time was ‘sustainable’. In November the die was cast for the NHS, as the Health and Care Bill passed through parliament.

    2021: the hardest of years for the NHS

    With December came the rapid rise of the Omicron variant, with the NHS and society more broadly standing on the edge of a cliff. Labour disgracefully helped Johnson push his vaccine passports and mandates through parliament. The government ran into issues with coronavirus test distribution; schools faced chaos, and the Tories’ vaccine passports system hit tech issues as soon as it was launched. So it was left to NHS Workers Say No to sum up people’s feelings in an open letter to the PM and the Tories. They said:

    Firstly, we would like to ask each and every one of you why, despite our incredible efforts, you continue to exploit us. The COVID-19 pandemic placed extraordinary strain on an already demoralised, devalued and depleted workforce, having spent ten years paying for your austerity measures. On behalf of the whole NHS workforce, and the rest of the country using our services, we want you to acknowledge the damage you have caused, apologise, and let someone else fix your mess.

    2021 will surely go down as one of the most difficult in the NHS’s history. Dealing with a global pandemic and everything that entails is hard enough. With the Tories in charge, the situation for healthcare workers and the public was made even harder. But still, throughout all this, NHS staff performed miracles on a daily basis – and held the line in the face of Tory attacks. They’ll continue to fight back in 2022.

    Featured image via Garry Knight – Flickr

    By Steve Topple

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • Anxiety in the run-up to Christmas has reached its highest level since the January lockdown, provisional figures suggest. Some 38% of adults are experiencing high levels of anxiety, according to an Office for National Statistics (ONS) survey between December 15 and 19.

    This is the highest proportion since January 13-17, when Britain was in its third national lockdown. The average anxiety score, which has been rising since the end of November, rose to 4.3 – the highest level since January 27-31. Happiness and life satisfaction scores fell slightly compared to the previous survey period – December 1-12.

    Coronavirus graphic
    (PA Graphics)

    The impact on adults

    And the proportion of adults who are very or somewhat worried about the effect of Covid-19 on their lives rose to 67%, from 56% earlier in December. The latest estimates are based on a survey of 3,314 adults in Britain as part of the ONS Opinions and Lifestyle survey examining the social impacts of coronavirus.

    It comes as the government enacted Plan B measures, such as making face coverings mandatory in most indoor public areas, and asking people to work from home where possible, in response to a rapid rise in Omicron cases.

    The government has promised no further restrictions in England before Christmas but has not ruled out curbs after this period. The survey also asked about what people have done so far and their plans in the run-up to and during Christmas.

    Coronavirus graphic
    (PA Graphics)

    Safety measures for Christmas

    Some 63% said they have already visited or plan to visit family or friends in their homes, 50% have hosted family and friends or are planning to, and 29% said they will meet up with others in food and drink outlets or have done already.

    Measures people said they have taken or plan to take include taking a rapid result lateral flow test before seeing others (54%), visiting only well-ventilated areas (22%), wearing a face covering (73%) and socially distancing where possible (69%).

    A fifth of adults (21%) say they are very or fairly unlikely to keep windows and doors open when they have visitors over the next fortnight, while 47% said they would be very or fairly likely. Reasons given include the home getting too cold (85%) and increased heating costs (44%).

    Half of adults said they feel they have enough information about the UK’s plan for dealing with coronavirus, 29% said they do not and 19% said they were unsure.

    By The Canary

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • 2021 saw the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) repeatedly hit the headlines. In this article, The Canary looks back at some of the big DWP stories from the year. But we’re also reminding our readers that even in the face of adversity, hope and triumph can prevail – as the past 12 months in the world of social security shows.

    A cold winter

    January 2021 started much like many other years at the DWP: with conscious cruelty and disregard for claimants. First, and after pausing sanctions during most of 2020, it brought them back in again, albeit via the backdoor. This was despite a national lockdown being in full force. Meanwhile, DWP boss Therese Coffey dismissed a parliamentary inquiry into how the government measures child poverty. Of course, she conveniently ignored the fact that the number of kids living in appalling conditions was over four million.

    In February, the High Court ruled that a Universal Credit policy was unlawful. Specifically, it was that parents having to pay childcare costs upfront and then claim the money back from the DWP was “disproportionately prejudicial” against women. But this wasn’t the end of the story. The DWP appealed, and the Court of Appeal ruled in its favour. So, the case will go to the Supreme Court next year for a final decision. As well as this, another new report came out – finding that destitution exploded during the pandemic.

    Spring: Universal Credit in the spotlight

    But throughout 2021, Universal Credit was at the forefront of many people’s minds – namely due to controversy over the £20-a-week uplift. A report in February slammed it as “inadequate”. Then, March saw protests over the fact chancellor Rishi Sunak had not uplifted legacy benefits like Employment and Support Allowance (ESA) in line with Universal Credit. But an interview with Martin Lewis revealed why Sunak had not done this. Because he said the £20-a-week increase was just for workers.

    Sunak’s discriminatory actions didn’t go unnoticed, as claimants brought a legal case against the government over its refusal to uplift legacy benefits. The outcome of it will be known in 2022. April saw two pieces of damning research into the DWP. One looked at the two-child limit on claiming certain benefits. It found more children in poverty and abortions increasing; The Canary branded this government “eugenics”. Then, another found that hundreds of thousands of people could have claimed Universal Credit during the pandemic – but didn’t.

    A summer of discontent and heartache

    Across May and then the summer, much of people’s focus was on fighting the Tories’ planned cut to Universal Credit. But two other stories stood out. Jodey Whiting took her own life after the DWP stopped her benefits. Her mother has been fighting ever since for a new inquest into her daughter’s death, which will look at the DWP’s role. As The Canary pointed out, around 35,000 people died across several years:

    They died either waiting for the DWP to sort their claims or after it said they were well enough to work or start moving towards work. Moreover, in 2018 alone there could have been 750 (if not more) people who took their own lives while claiming from the DWP. But across five years, the department only reviewed 69 cases of people taking their own lives.

    Clearly the DWP thinks that nearly 35,000 (recorded) deaths doesn’t constitute a systemic problem.

    This point was then put into even sharper focus. Because as Disability News Service (DNS) first reported, and The Canary followed up on, the DWP may have secretly investigated twice as many claimant deaths as in 2019 – with potentially countless numbers of them involving people taking their own lives.

    Autumn brings chaos

    September onward saw more people fighting back against the Universal Credit cut. But sadly it was to no avail – as the cut happened anyway, affecting around 3.4 million children. But even in the midst of this, people we’re still winning battles against the DWP. For example, a court case in September forced the department to change its rules around sanctions and taking money off people. And another court case was looming as well – over severely disabled people losing money on Universal Credit.

    We also found out that the UN was preparing to investigate the UK government and DWP (again) over its treatment of disabled people. Then, Sunak’s October budget and his tinkering with Universal Credit left millions of people worse off. In November, we found out that the DWP and tribunals were having to overturn a wrong benefits decision by the department every minute of the working day. There was also the impact of a court case from 2019, which saw the DWP having to look at around 340,000 people’s claims – because it might be underpaying them.

    December chills ahead of 2022

    And finally, just to add insult to injury in December the Mirror exposed that Coffey’s DWP office staff were ordering takeaways and drinking booze together while the rest of us were in lockdown in late 2020. Days before the revelations, Tories laughed and groaned during a parliamentary debate about disabled people. That incident takes on a whole, new meaning now.

    As The Canary previously summed up:

    For years, the DWP and its staff have treated claimants with contempt and disregard. This led to a report by the UN which accused successive governments and the DWP of “grave” and “systematic” violations of chronically ill and disabled people’s human rights. The chair of the UN committee who did the report said they had created a “human catastrophe”.

    Will 2022 be any different? It seems unlikely, given we have a Tory government. But what 2021 did show was that sometimes, battles against the DWP can be won. And moreover, the year was filled by people fighting back against the department. That surely needs to continue in 2022.

    Featured image via Frantisek_Krejci – Pixabay and Wikimedia 

    By Steve Topple

    This post was originally published on The Canary.

  • Saying that British hunts have had a difficult year would be an understatement. Unfortunately for them – but fortunately for foxes, their human advocates, and the natural world as a whole – their favourite day of the year, Boxing Day, isn’t shaping up to be any better.

    A bad year

    One of the most devastating blows for hunters this year was the National Trust’s decision to ban trail hunting from its land. Trail hunting is supposed to involve the laying of an artificial trail for dogs to follow. It’s widely considered by campaigners as a cover for actual fox hunting.

    The National Trust decision came in the wake of another hit in October. Mark Hankinson, a Master of Foxhounds Association director, was found guilty of “encouraging or assisting others to commit an offence under the Hunting Act”. The prosecution centred on webinars he spoke at, where he associated trail hunting with a “smokescreen” that can “portray to the people watching that you’re going about legitimate business”.

    In an equally calamitous knock, Natural Resources Wales banned trail hunting on its land in November. Oh, and a primary school teacher lost her job after the Hertfordshire Hunt Saboteurs shared a video of her kicking and hitting a horse. Reports suggest she is a member of the Cottesmore Hunt.

    A special day?

    Boxing Day is usually a highly treasured moment in the hunts’ year. They parade through towns across the country and then head off into the countryside for their ‘sport’. This year many hunts intend to head out on 27 December, as Boxing Day falls on a Sunday. But some hunts won’t get to carry out their charade. Sorry, I mean parade. Rutland County Council, for example, has decided that the Cottesmore Hunt cannot carry out hunting activities on its land on Boxing Day and New Year’s Day as the hunt had indicated it wanted to do.

    A petition started by Keep the Ban that calls on all local authorities to ban Boxing Day meets has also gained some momentum.

    Those hunts that do go out may well be met with protests. And this year, huntspeople will have to head out in the knowledge that the tide is well and truly turning against their favoured activity. A recent Survation poll suggested that the majority of people believe UK authorities should give foxes greater protections. Over 60% of respondents also backed a permanent ban on trail hunting. Keep the Ban initiated the poll.

    Meanwhile, the group is releasing a short animation on Boxing Day called A Trail of Lies, involving naturalist and campaigner Chris Packham and actor and campaigner Peter Egan:

    In short, there’s not much for hunts and their supporters to be cheery about this Christmas. For foxes and other wildlife, however, that’s some cause for celebration.

    Featured image via Keep the Ban / YouTube

    By Tracy Keeling

    This post was originally published on The Canary.