London Lamar rose from her chair in the Tennessee Senate last spring, stomach churning with anxiety as she prepared to address the sea of men sitting at creaky wooden desks around her. She wore a hot pink dress as a nod to the health needs of women, including the very few of them elected to this chamber, none of whom were, like her, obviously pregnant. She set her hands onto her growing belly.
European court of human rights finds that Polish abortion legislation breached a pregnant woman’s right to privacy and family life, after her foetus was diagnosed with Down’s syndrome
Poland’s 2020 abortion legislation violated the rights of a woman who was forced to travel abroad to access an abortion, the European court of human rights ruled on Thursday.
The court found that while the legislation, which prevented the applicant from accessing an abortion after her foetus was diagnosed with trisomy 21 (Down’s syndrome), did not legally amount to “inhuman or degrading treatment”, it did violate her right to privacy and family life, protected under article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Narges Mohammadi, who won peace prize for her activism against oppression of women in Iran, is in prison in Tehran
The family of Narges Mohammadi has said the imprisonment of the Iranian women’s rights activist is a “constant and daily struggle” as they prepare to receive the Nobel peace prize in Oslo on her behalf.
Her husband, Taghi Rahmani, who lives in exile in Paris with their two teenage children, said the only help comes from seeing her work internationally recognised and the solidarity she receives from around the world.
• How appropriate that on the day you note that Katherine Rundell, the author of The Golden Mole, has won the Waterstones book award with Impossible Creatures (Report, 30 November), we also learn of a golden mole reappearing after being feared extinct (Report, 30 November). Jim Golcher Greens Norton, Northamptonshire
Western Australia’s Minister for Women’s Interests Sue Ellery has stressed the need for cultural change to support more women in STEM, startups, and venture capital, as she shared stories of cultural barriers within the state government. Ms Ellery, who is also Minister for Finance and Commerce, called for cultural change in the venture capital sector,…
Western Australia’s Minister for Women’s Interests Sue Ellery has stressed the need for cultural change to support more women in STEM, startups, and venture capital, as she shared stories of cultural barriers within the state government. Ms Ellery, who is also Minister for Finance and Commerce, called for cultural change in the venture capital sector,…
An Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence has achieved gender parity among its researchers and students in half a decade, without the need for quotas. Its leaders say its evidence-based program detailed in a new publication on Friday could be emulated by other organisations. ARC Centre of Excellence for All Sky Astrophysics in 3 Dimensions…
Armita Geravand, 16, fell into coma on 1 October and was pronounced brain dead last week
A 16-year-old Iranian girl has died after an alleged encounter with officers over violating the country’s hijab law, state media and activists have said.
Iran has denied that Armita Geravand was hurt after a confrontation on 1 October with officers enforcing the mandatory Islamic dress code in the Tehran metro. She had been pronounced brain dead last week after falling into a coma on 1 October.
Myanmar troops arrested around 50 villagers in an act of retaliation, locals told Radio Free Asia on Wednesday. After a local People’s Defence Force attacked a junta outpost, soldiers captured women, children and entire families from a nearby village.
While the army has already released some detainees, others remain in custody in Tanintharyi, the country’s southern coastal region. Locals from Myeik township said soldiers captured them on Monday following a clash that allegedly left several junta soldiers dead.
The arrests are ongoing, a resident who did not want to be named for security reasons told RFA on Wednesday.
“They arrested all the villagers in Tone Byaw Gyi village. There are entire families, even mothers with newborn babies,” he said. “Some were released. Some are still being arrested.”
The militia group attacked the post in Tone Byaw Gyi last week, an official from the local People’s Defense Force said.
“We tried to seize the outpost, but we couldn’t because they laid many landmines around it,” he said, asking to remain anonymous for fear of reprisals.
“We left the battle because we were out of arms and ammunition. Our side lost a drone in the battle.”
Junta forces are treating villagers harshly because of their heavy losses, he said, adding that 12 soldiers were killed and six were injured.
RFA has been unable to confirm these claims.
Tanintharyi region’s junta spokesperson Thant Zin did not respond to RFA’s request for comment by the time of publication.
The junta outpost in Tone Byaw Gyi is the site of many ongoing clashes since the country’s 2021 coup, with local resistance groups bombing the outpost in July.
Regime troops arrested over 3,200 people in Tanintharyi region between April 2022 and September 2023. Among them, 2,141 were released, according to the independent research group that goes only by the initials FEB Tanintharyi.
Junta troops killed at least 56 women in Myanmar during the three months ending September, according to the Burma Women’s Union, or BWU, amid a scorched earth offensive that has left the country’s most vulnerable victims of the military’s worst atrocities.
Of those killed between July 1 and Sept. 28, 30 died by artillery strikes, six by air strikes, 13 were shot dead, one died in custody, three were burned alive, one was raped and killed, and two were beaten to death, the BWU said in a report, citing information compiled by Thailand’s Assistance Association for Political Prisoners (Burma).
BWU Joint General Secretary Wai Wai told RFA Burmese that her organization is working to ensure that the junta is held accountable for these and other killings carried out in the aftermath of its Feb. 1, 2021 coup d’etat.
“For the women who died because of these inhuman acts committed by the terrorist army, the Burma Women’s Union will cooperate with all relevant organizations that are trying to bring justice to the victims, those who lost their family members and survivors,” she said.
Wai Wai said the death toll in the BWU’s report may be incomplete and could be much higher.
The aftermath of the Myanmar junta airstrike on the Mung Lai Hkyet displaced persons camp near Laiza, Kachin state, are seen on Oct. 10, 2023. Credit: AFP
In one incident, in Sagaing region’s Wetlet township, on Aug. 27, junta troops raided Kyee Kan (North) village and killed four civilians, including a 20-year-old woman named Shwe Mann Thu, residents said.
The young woman was arrested and killed after being sexually assaulted, said a person close to her family who, like others interviewed for this report, spoke on condition of anonymity, citing fear of reprisal.
“When her body was found, she was naked, and a … container was inserted into her vagina,” the person said. “We saw signs of rape … and her throat was slashed.”
In another incident, on Aug. 3, a 43-year-old woman displaced by fighting in Kayah state’s Demoso township stepped on a military landmine and bled to death, according to Banyar, the director of the Karenni National Human Rights Group.
“The junta troops have planted many mines here,” he said. “Most people don’t die if they step on … mines but are wounded or lose their legs … [others] bleed to death.”
Banyar said that no one should have to fear stepping on a landmine in a civilian area where no members of the armed resistance are present.
Most vulnerable at risk
Naw Susanna Hla Hla Soe, the minister of women, youths and children’s affairs for Myanmar’s shadow National Unity Government, or NUG, told RFA that women and children have been subjected to the worst violence by junta troops since the coup.
“Currently, more than 2 million people have fled their homes due to the junta’s crackdown and more than half of them are women and children,” she said. “These incidents are because of the junta, which is targeting the people as if they were enemies and then committing crimes.”
Aung Zaw Win was arrested and killed by pro-junta militia Pyu Saw Htee in Nyaung Wun village of Sagaing region’s Mawlaik township on Oct. 12, 2023. Credit: Citizen journalist
She vowed that the junta’s crimes against women and children will be thoroughly documented and sent for review to international bodies of justice.
Attempts by RFA to contact junta Deputy Information Minister Major Gen. Zaw Min Tun for comments regarding the claims by the BWU went unanswered Monday, however, junta chief Senior Gen. Min Aung Hlaing has said that his soldiers “do not harm civilians.”
According to the Assistance Association for Political Prisoners, over 600 women are among the more than 4,000 people killed by the junta troops since the coup.
Hundreds of civilians killed
The BWU’s investigation into the junta’s killing of women came as another watchdog, the Pyinsama Mandai Civil Surveillance Group, or PMCSG, said that at least 473 civilians were killed in violence in the regions of Sagaing, Magway, and Yangon, and Chin state, alone in the four months ending in August.
Among those killed were 435 men and 38 women, as well as 29 boys and two girls under the age of 18, the group said in a report released Monday.
At least 11 massacres – defined as the killing of 10 or more civilians at once – took place between May and the end of August, PMCSG said. Six occurred in Sagaing and five in Chin state, it said.
When compiling records of human rights violations and crimes in the four regions and state, PMCSG said that 405 attacks were committed by the junta, 80 by anti-junta People’s Defense Force paramilitary groups, and 44 by unidentified armed groups.
Of the 405 attacks by the junta, 344 targeted civilians and 61 targeted armed groups, it said. At least 205 incidents were classified as war crimes, 112 as human rights violations, and 27 as regular crimes.
PMCSG said it had compiled data for its report based on “information on the ground,” as well as from trusted news outlets, and interviews with families of the victims.
Junta representatives were unavailable for comment on the PMCSG’s findings.
Translated by Htin Aung Kyaw. Edited by Joshua Lipes and Malcolm Foster.
This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by By RFA Burmese.
Armita Geravand, 16, remains in hospital after alleged encounter with hijab enforcer on Tehran metro
Iranian opposition figures have demanded the release of complete CCTV footage of an incident in which a 16-year-old girl, now in a coma, collapsed after a claimed encounter with hijab police on the Tehran metro.
Armita Geravand remains in hospital after the incident on Sunday. Authorities have released footage that they say substantiates their claim that Armita fainted due to a drop in blood pressure, but witnesses and rights groups abroad allege that she fell during a confrontation with agents because she was not wearing the hijab.
Shops that serve unveiled women could be shut under draft law UN human rights body says suppresses women into ‘total submission’
Women in Iran face up to 10 years in prison if they continue to defy the country’s mandatory hijab law, under harsher laws awaiting approval by authorities. Even businesses that serve women without a hijab face being shut down.
The stricter dress code, which amounts to “gender apartheid”, UN experts said, comes one year after the death in custody of Mahsa Amini, 22, who had been detained for allegedly wearing the Islamic headscarf incorrectly. Her death, after allegedly being beaten by police, led to the largest wave of popular unrest for years in Iran.
When the COVID-19 pandemic hit the labor market and women lost millions of jobs, the country plunged into the first women’s recession. It was the first time women had experienced more job losses than men in one catastrophic economic contraction. Economists feared it could take decades for women to recover. But just three years later, that recovery has already arrived. As a group, women are back to…
Minister says women visiting the lakes of Band-e-Amir have not been wearing their hijabs properly
The Taliban have banned women from visiting one of Afghanistan’s most popular national parks, adding to a long list of restrictions aimed at shrinking women’s access to public places.
Thousands of people visit Band-e-Amir national park each year, taking in its stunning landscape of sapphire-blue lakes and towering cliffs in the country’s central Bamiyan province.
A Minnesota Public Radio article noted last month that “women are returning to the job market in droves.” While it’s true that women may be returning to work; they are not doing so without challenges. Most people have no idea the systems that must be in place in early childhood education to accommodate women and families and help them get back to work and stay at work. Simply put…
Commemorative tattoos | Fringe first | Bibby Stockholm | Sunak’s trousers
I’m sorry that only those between 18 and 30 have been invited to apply to take part in the tattooing of all the letters of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, one letter at a time (Report, 6 August). A decade ago, in my late 60s, I got a tattoo on my wrist to commemorate my great-grandmother who was a suffragette, imprisoned in Holloway and awarded the Holloway brooch. My tattoo has the purple, white and green flashes of the brooch. Sally Smith Redruth, Corwall
• Natalie Haynes advises fringe performers not to read reviews (Some people just won’t like you, but don’t take it personally: what surviving the fringe taught me about life, 7 August). Many years ago at the fringe I took part in a hastily put together and under-rehearsed first production of a play by a then unknown playwright. Only after we’d read the reviews did we realise what a theatrical masterpiece we’d been performing. Walter Merricks Polonius, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead, 1966
Rosa Jimenez Is Exonerated of a Crime That Never Took Place After 20 Years
08.07.23
Rosa Jimenez in downtown Austin, Texas, on March 4, 2021.
(Aug. 7, 2023 — Austin, TX) Rosa Jimenez was exonerated today after the Travis County District Attorney moved to dismiss a 2003 murder charge against her, based on testimony from leading pediatric airway experts that affirmed the death at the center of the case was a tragic accident and not murder.
Ms. Jimenez, who has always maintained her innocence, was convicted of murder after a 21-month-old child she was babysitting choked on paper towels and suffered a severe brain injury due to oxygen deprivation. He passed away three months later.
Prior to today’s dismissal, Ms. Jimenez was released from prison in 2021 after Judge Karen Sage of the 299th Criminal District Court in Austin, Texas recommended that Ms. Jimenez’s habeas petition be granted, finding that, “There was no crime committed here … Ms. Jimenez is innocent.” The decision came after the Travis County District Attorney’s Office conducted an in-depth review of the evidence through its trial division, special victims unit, and conviction integrity unit. The evidence included reports and testimony of numerous pediatric airway experts who unanimously concluded that the choking incident was the result of a tragic accident. At Ms. Jimenez’s original trial, the State presented faulty testimony stating it would have been physically impossible for the child to have accidentally choked. In May 2023, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals overturned her 2005 conviction, ruling that the State had used false and misleading testimony to obtain her conviction. Support for Ms. Jimenez’s innocence has been widespread, particularly among Travis County state legislators. Over the years, four Texas judges who have reviewed her case in federal and state courts have all concluded that Ms. Jimenez is likely innocent and the child’s death was an accident.
“Rosa was the mom to a one-year-old girl and seven months pregnant when this ordeal began. She was forced to give birth to her son in jail, shackled, while awaiting trial. For the past 20 years, she has fought for this day, her freedom, and to be reunited with her children.” said Vanessa Potkin, director of special litigation and Ms. Jimenez’s attorney. “Her wrongful conviction was not grounded in medical science, but faulty medical assumptions that turned a tragedy into a crime — with her own attorney doing virtually nothing to defend her. I wish we could say that what happened to Rosa was an isolated occurrence, but we have a real, pervasive problem in our country when it comes to how the criminal legal system treats the caregivers of children who are hurt or die. There are hundreds, if not thousands, of innocent caregivers and parents in prison today based on faulty, unscientific medical testimony misclassifying accidents or illness as abuse.”
A decade into her incarceration at 33 years old, Ms. Jimenez was diagnosed with kidney disease, which progressed to end-stage during her wrongful incarceration. Months after her release in 2021, she began dialysis and is now in need of a life-saving kidney transplant. “Just when Rosa can finally close the chapter on her 20-year fight to prove her innocence, she has to take on a new battle — the fight for her life,” Ms. Potkin said. Ms. Jimenez is being evaluated by Weill Cornell hospital for a kidney transplant and is hoping to find a living donor.
Ms. Jimenez’s case has garnered attention from local and national leaders, including San Antonio Spurs Head Coach Gregg Popovich. “I’ve been following Rosa’s case since she was released two years ago and moved to San Antonio,” Coach Popovich said. “It’s heartbreaking — a tragic miscarriage of justice. DA Garza and his team deserve great credit for helping the Innocence Project establish Rosa’s innocence with new scientific evidence. Rosa is just 41, endured nearly 20 years wrongly incarcerated, and desperately needs a live donor so she can get a kidney transplant. Please check out the micro site Weill Cornell Medical Center in New York has established for kidney donors Kidney4Rosa.com. Help save her life.”
“Just when Rosa can finally close the chapter on her 20-year fight to prove her innocence, she has to take on a new battle — the fight for her life.”
“Just when Rosa can finally close the chapter on her 20-year fight to prove her innocence, she has to take on a new battle — the fight for her life.”
Vanessa Potkin Director of Special Litigation and Ms. Jimenez’s attorney
Rosa Jimenez holding her daughter Brenda. (Image: Courtesy of Rosa Jimenez)
A Crime That Never Occurred
In January 2003, Ms. Jimenez was caring for her 1-year-old daughter Brenda and the 21-month-old year-old boy, whom she regularly babysat, when the toddler approached her choking. She immediately tried to remove the blockage, but, when she was unable to do so, she rushed to a neighbor’s house for help and they called 911. The child was resuscitated by paramedics, but the lack of oxygen resulted in severe brain damage, and he died three months later.
After the accident, Ms. Jimenez, who was pregnant with her second child and did not speak much English, was questioned for over five hours by an allegedly bilingual police officer whom Ms. Jimenez described as barely able to speak Spanish. While trained interpreters are provided at trials, an interpreter is not constitutionally guaranteed during a law enforcement interrogation. Although Ms. Jimenez had difficulty understanding the officers, she consistently maintained her innocence and repeatedly explained that the child had accidentally choked. Ms. Jimenez, who regularly cared for children in her community, had no criminal record, and there was no history or evidence of abuse in the child’s death. Despite this, she was arrested and charged later that night. Ms. Jimenez’s situation is not uncommon among wrongly convicted women. According to the National Registry of Exonerations, 40% of female exoneres were wrongly convicted of harming children or other loved ones in their care.
Rosa Jimenez holding her daughter Brenda. (Image: Courtesy of Rosa Jimenez)
“I wish we could say that what happened to Rosa
was an isolated occurrence,
but we have a real, pervasive problem in our country
when it comes to how the criminal legal system
treats the caregivers of children who are hurt or die.”
Vanessa Potkin
Director of Special Litigation and Ms. Jimenez’s attorney
Rosa Jimenez (left) who was released from prison after serving 17 years for a crime she did not commit is hugged by her attorney Vanessa Potkin.
The Danger of Faulty Medical Evidence
At trial, the State relied on faulty medical testimony contending that it was impossible for the toddler to have accidentally choked on the paper towels, which he’d put in his own mouth, and that Ms. Jimenez must have forced them into his mouth. Ms. Jimenez’s appointed attorney never presented any credible expert witnesses to rebut the State’s faulty claims, and she was convicted and sentenced to 99 years in prison.
After the Innocence Project took on Ms. Jimenez as a client, her lawyers sought out top medical airway experts to evaluate the case evidence. Four top pediatric airways specialists from Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and Children’s Medical Center, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, and Stanford University Lucile Salter Packard Children’s Hospital independently reviewed the case and issued a consensus report concluding that all the medical evidence indicated that the child accidentally choked, and that Ms. Jimenez had been wrongly convicted of a crime that never occurred.
Nearly 71% of female exonerees were convicted of crimes that never took place. As with Ms. Jimenez, such “crimes” include incidents later determined to be accidents according to the National Registry of Exonerations.
A Woefully Inadequate Defense
At her 2005 trial, Ms. Jimenez’s court-appointed attorney failed to present a meaningful defense in response to the State’s unfounded medical testimony. The principal issue addressed at trial was whether this was an accidental choking. Ms. Jimenez’s trial counsel failed to present qualified experts to counter the State’s false testimony that it was impossible for this to have been an accident.
Ms. Jimenez’s attorney called only one expert who was fully discredited on cross-examination, who went on an explosive and harmful rant, and, at one point, yelled expletives at the prosecution. A state court habeas judge in 2010 who first recommended that Ms. Jimenez receive a new trial noted that in his “30 years as a licensed attorney, [and] 20 years in the judiciary, [he had] never seen such unprofessional and biased conduct from any witness, much less a purported expert,” adding that the expert had left Ms. Jimenez’s case in greater jeopardy than before he testified.
In September 2018, a federal district court also ruled that Ms. Jimenez’s conviction should be vacated because she was denied her constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel. That ruling was under appeal by the Texas Attorney General’s office, and, at that time, the Travis County District Attorney’s Office initiated a review of the new medical evidence.
“As prosecutors, we have an obligation to ensure the integrity of convictions and to seek justice,“ said Travis County District Attorney José Garza. “In the case against Rosa Jimenez, it is clear that false medical testimony was used to obtain her conviction, and without that testimony under the law, she would not have been convicted. Dismissing Ms. Jimenez’s case is the right thing to do.”Our hearts also continue to break for the Gutierrez family. In this case, our criminal justice system failed them, and it also failed Rosa Jimenez. Our hope is that by our actions today, by exposing the truth that Ms. Jimenez did not commit the crime for which she was accused, we can give some sense of closure and peace to both families.”
40%
of female exoneres were wrongly convicted of harming children or other loved ones in their care.
71%
of female exonerees were convicted of crimes that never took place.
Rosa Jimenez and her son Aiden. (Image: Vanessa Potkin)
A Family Reunites
Ms. Jimenez was seven months pregnant at the time of her arrest. She gave birth to her son Emmanuel in jail while awaiting trial. She held him for a total of five hours before he was taken from her and placed in foster care along with her daughter. During Ms. Jimenez’s incarceration, her children grew into young adults. Although they visited her over the years in prison, Ms. Jimenez was never allowed to hold or make physical contact with them because she had been convicted of harming a child. Upon her release in 2021, Ms. Jimenez reconnected with both Emmanuel (who now goes by Aiden) and Brenda, whose wedding Ms. Jimenez was able to attend shortly thereafter. She now looks forward to becoming a grandparent in August.
Ms. Jimenez now faces another fight: to find a kidney donor and receive a life saving transplant. “The past 20 years, I have been fighting for my freedom, my innocence, and my children. Now I have a second fight,” said Ms. Jimenez. ”I want to have a long, healthy life with my family, who I waited so long to be with again. I want to see my grandchildren grow up. I have come so far, and I will keep fighting for as long as it takes.”Ms. Jimenez is represented by Vanessa Potkin at the Innocence Project; current and former Foley & Lardner LLP trial lawyers Rachel O’Neil, Sara Brown, Sadie Butler, and Joanne Early and Kirkland & Ellis LLP.
Thank you for visiting us. You can learn more about how we consider cases here. Please avoid sharing any personal information in the comments below and join us in making this a hate-speech free and safe space for everyone.
Today, a Texas District Judge issued an injunctionblocking Texas’ abortion bans as they apply to dangerous pregnancy complications, including fatal fetal diagnoses. After much confusion around what conditions qualify as “medical emergencies” under Texas’ abortion bans, today’s ruling gives clarity to doctors as to when they can provide abortions and allows them to use their own medical judgment. The Judge recognized that the women in the case should have been given abortions, and also dismissed the state’s request to throw out the case. Furthermore, today’s ruling found S.B. 8—a citizen-enforced abortion ban—unconstitutional.
In her ruling, Judge Jessica Mangrum wrote that doctors cannot be prosecuted for using their own “good faith judgement,” and that “The Court finds that physical medical conditions include, at a minimum: a physical medical condition or complication of pregnancy that poses a risk of infection, or otherwise makes continuing a pregnancy unsafe for the pregnant person; a physical medical condition that is exacerbated by pregnancy, cannot be effectively treated during pregnancy, or requires recurrent invasive intervention; and/or a fetal condition where the fetus is unlikely to survive the pregnancy and sustain life after birth.”
In Texas state court, a ruling is automatically stayed as soon as it is appealed, meaning today’s injunction will be temporarily blocked if and when the state appeals. Today’s ruling comes following a hearing in the case last month, where five of the plaintiffs gave gripping testimony and were callously cross examined by the state’s attorneys, who asked to have the case thrown out.
“Today’s ruling should prevent other Texans from suffering the unthinkable trauma our plaintiffs endured,” said Nancy Northup, President and CEO of the Center for Reproductive Rights. “It would be unconscionable for the State of Texas to appeal this ruling. The court has been clear: doctors must be able to provide patients the standard of care in pregnancy complications. That standard of care in certain cases is abortion because it is essential, life-saving healthcare. This decision is a win for Texans with pregnancy complications, however Texas is still denying the right to abortion care for the vast majority of those who seek it.”
“For the first time in a long time, I cried for joy when I heard the news,” said lead plaintiff Amanda Zurawski. “This is exactly why we did this. This is why we put ourselves through the pain and the trauma over and over again to share our experiences and the harms caused by these awful laws. I have a sense of relief, a sense of hope, and a weight has been lifted. Now people don’t have to be pregnant and scared in Texas anymore. We’re back to relying on doctors and not politicians to help us make the best medical decisions for our bodies and our lives.”
“This makes me hopeful that we can continue to provide competent rational care,” said plaintiff Dr. Damla Karsan. “It’s exactly what we needed. The court has guaranteed that we can once again provide the best care without fear of criminal or professional retribution. We can once again rely on our knowledge and training especially in challenging situations where abortions are necessary.”
The Center for Reproductive Rights brought this case—Zurawski v. State of Texas—on behalf of two OB-GYNs and 13 Texans who suffered severe pregnancy complications, yet were denied abortions due to the state’s abortion bans. The overarching Texas abortion ban will remain in place however, meaning most Texans will still be unable to access abortion in the state.
The conflicting language in Texas’ abortion bans has resulted in pervasive fear and confusion among doctors as to when they can help patients with severe pregnancy complications. Texas doctors have been turning patients away because they face up to 99 years in prison, at least $100,000 in fines, and the loss of their medical license for violating the abortion bans. This means pregnant Texans are being forced to either wait until they are near death to receive care or flee the state if they are able. In Zurawski v. State of Texas, the Center for Reproductive Rightsasked the court to give doctors clarity on what circumstances qualify as exceptions and to allow doctors to use their own medical judgment without fear of prosecution.
The lawsuit was filed by the Center for Reproductive Rights, Morrison & Foerster LLP, and Kaplan Law Firm on behalf of patients Amanda Zurawski; Lauren Miller; Lauren Hall; Anna Zargarian; Ashley Brandt; Kylie Beaton; Jessica Bernardo; Samantha Casiano; Austin Dennard, D.O.; Taylor Edwards; Kiersten Hogan; Lauren Van Vleet; and Elizabeth Weller as well as healthcare providers Dr. Damla Karsan, M.D. and Dr. Judy Levison, M.D., M.P.H.
This content originally appeared on Common Dreams and was authored by Newswire Editor.
Government blocks event after release of publicity featuring Susan Taslimi in 1982 film The Death of Yazdgerd
Iranian authorities have banned a film festival that issued a publicity poster featuring an actor who was not wearing a hijab, state media has reported.
The move came after the Iranian Short Film Association (ISFA) released a poster for its upcoming short-film festival featuring the Iranian actor Susan Taslimi in the 1982 film The Death of Yazdgerd.
Industry minister Ed Husic says the independent review of federally funded programs designed to encourage women into science and technology professions will make for “uncomfortable” reading when it is released later this year. As new research reveals the representation of women in the STEM workforce remains stubbornly low at 15 per cent, Mr Husic said…
North Korean authorities are cracking down on women for smoking in public, saying they are promoting capitalist culture and extinguishing socialist morals, residents in the country told Radio Free Asia.
But the same thinking does not seem to apply to men. The country’s supreme leader, Kim Jong Un, for example, is a chain smoker often seen in state media holding a lit cigarette.
In North Korea, it is natural for men to smoke, but frowned on for women to do the same, sources told RFA.
Statistics as recent as 2020 seem to confirm this trend, with 46.1 percent of North Korean men self-reporting that they have used tobacco –compared to zero women– according to a report by 38 North, a publication of the Washington-based Stimson Center think tank.
But these days, more women are lighting up in front of other people, and authorities are enforcing anti-public-smoking laws on women but not on men.
“Even if the authorities try to [enforce a ban], it doesn’t stop men from smoking, but recently they are catching women smoking too,” a source in the northwestern province of North Pyongan told RFA on condition of anonymity for security reasons.
“The authorities have been cracking down since early this month as more and more women smoke [in public], mainly in the city,” she said.
Anti-smoking laws
In 2005, North Korea passed the Tobacco Control Law, which made it illegal to smoke in hospitals and medical clinics, and on public transportation. This did little to prevent public smoking in other areas.
In a move that was publicized as beneficial for public health and the environment, the country introduced the Tobacco Prohibition Law in 2020, which regulated production and sales of cigarettes, designated more public spaces where smoking is banned, and laid out detailed punishments for smoking in public.
Manufacturers and male smokers were largely allowed to ignore the law, as the firms were responsible for generating revenue for the state, which is only possible if smokers can light up.
Plus, RFA reported in 2020 that North Koreans privately called the anti-smoking laws hypocritical because Kim Jong Un is often pictured in state media puffing away on cigarettes, including in front of children at an orphanage he was visiting around the time the law was passed.
North Korean leader Kim Jong Un is a longtime smoker. Credit: Reuters and AFP
But a recent rise in public smoking by women is the cause for the recent crackdown, which has police monitoring places like restaurants and marketplaces, the North Pyongan resident said.
“This is the first crackdown like this,” she said, and described a June 10 incident where two women in their 40s were fined 30,000 won (US$3.60) for smoking after eating a meal at a restaurant in the city of Sinuiju, which lies on the border with China.
“The police warned them that if they are caught smoking again they will be fined 100,000 won ($12) and if they are caught a third time they could be imprisoned at a disciplinary labor center for a month,” the resident said.
Targeting the wealthy
In the city of Anju, in South Pyongan province, police are even going undercover to try to catch women smoking, a resident there told RFA on condition of anonymity to speak freely.
“Since the beginning of this month, social security agents in civilian clothes have been visiting every restaurant near the provincial arts theater in Anju,” she said. “Many artists and rich people [go there] and many of the women smoke cigarettes.”
The South Pyongan resident said that until recently women who smoke did so secretly, but now they are smoking in front of others. She attributed the rise in female smoking to the greater stresses they face earning money to feed their families.
In the past, North Korean men could expect to support a family with the income from their government assigned jobs, but this became impossible after the economic collapse that led to the 1994-1998 North Korean famine.
Rapid inflation since then rendered the men’s salaries nearly irrelevant, so it has fallen on the women to make money by operating their own businesses, and a nascent market economy has since emerged.
Modern women
So now, women who smoke are seen as more modern than their counterparts of yesteryear, the South Pyongan source said.
Smoking among women is also a sign that women are rebelling against an oppressive society pressure that has consistently suppressed their desires, Yoon Bo Young, a researcher who focuses on North Korean women and society at South Korea’s Dongguk University, told RFA.
“As women’s rights are expanded and women’s abilities are demonstrated, women act to break taboos,” said Yoon. “From that point of view, a woman who smokes should be recognized as a modern woman in North Korea. This is a society where hair must be neatly tied and women must wear appropriate clothes.”
Despite the obvious harmful health impact of smoking, doing so in public can be seen as a way for women to assert their independence.
Yoon noted that in Korean culture, smoking has traditionally been considered a male pastime, but now fewer female smokers are hiding their habit in South Korea as well.
She predicted that women feeling comfortable enough to smoke in public will cause more cracks in North Korean social norms.
Translated by Claire Shinyoung Oh Lee. Written in English by Eugene Whong. Edited by Malcolm Foster.
This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by By Son Hyemin for RFA Korean.
North Korean authorities are cracking down on women for smoking in public, saying they are promoting capitalist culture and extinguishing socialist morals, residents in the country told Radio Free Asia.
But the same thinking does not seem to apply to men. The country’s supreme leader, Kim Jong Un, for example, is a chain smoker often seen in state media holding a lit cigarette.
In North Korea, it is natural for men to smoke, but frowned on for women to do the same, sources told RFA.
Statistics as recent as 2020 seem to confirm this trend, with 46.1 percent of North Korean men self-reporting that they have used tobacco –compared to zero women– according to a report by 38 North, a publication of the Washington-based Stimson Center think tank.
But these days, more women are lighting up in front of other people, and authorities are enforcing anti-public-smoking laws on women but not on men.
“Even if the authorities try to [enforce a ban], it doesn’t stop men from smoking, but recently they are catching women smoking too,” a source in the northwestern province of North Pyongan told RFA on condition of anonymity for security reasons.
“The authorities have been cracking down since early this month as more and more women smoke [in public], mainly in the city,” she said.
Anti-smoking laws
In 2005, North Korea passed the Tobacco Control Law, which made it illegal to smoke in hospitals and medical clinics, and on public transportation. This did little to prevent public smoking in other areas.
In a move that was publicized as beneficial for public health and the environment, the country introduced the Tobacco Prohibition Law in 2020, which regulated production and sales of cigarettes, designated more public spaces where smoking is banned, and laid out detailed punishments for smoking in public.
Manufacturers and male smokers were largely allowed to ignore the law, as the firms were responsible for generating revenue for the state, which is only possible if smokers can light up.
Plus, RFA reported in 2020 that North Koreans privately called the anti-smoking laws hypocritical because Kim Jong Un is often pictured in state media puffing away on cigarettes, including in front of children at an orphanage he was visiting around the time the law was passed.
North Korean leader Kim Jong Un is a longtime smoker. Credit: Reuters and AFP
But a recent rise in public smoking by women is the cause for the recent crackdown, which has police monitoring places like restaurants and marketplaces, the North Pyongan resident said.
“This is the first crackdown like this,” she said, and described a June 10 incident where two women in their 40s were fined 30,000 won (US$3.60) for smoking after eating a meal at a restaurant in the city of Sinuiju, which lies on the border with China.
“The police warned them that if they are caught smoking again they will be fined 100,000 won ($12) and if they are caught a third time they could be imprisoned at a disciplinary labor center for a month,” the resident said.
Targeting the wealthy
In the city of Anju, in South Pyongan province, police are even going undercover to try to catch women smoking, a resident there told RFA on condition of anonymity to speak freely.
“Since the beginning of this month, social security agents in civilian clothes have been visiting every restaurant near the provincial arts theater in Anju,” she said. “Many artists and rich people [go there] and many of the women smoke cigarettes.”
The South Pyongan resident said that until recently women who smoke did so secretly, but now they are smoking in front of others. She attributed the rise in female smoking to the greater stresses they face earning money to feed their families.
In the past, North Korean men could expect to support a family with the income from their government assigned jobs, but this became impossible after the economic collapse that led to the 1994-1998 North Korean famine.
Rapid inflation since then rendered the men’s salaries nearly irrelevant, so it has fallen on the women to make money by operating their own businesses, and a nascent market economy has since emerged.
Modern women
So now, women who smoke are seen as more modern than their counterparts of yesteryear, the South Pyongan source said.
Smoking among women is also a sign that women are rebelling against an oppressive society pressure that has consistently suppressed their desires, Yoon Bo Young, a researcher who focuses on North Korean women and society at South Korea’s Dongguk University, told RFA.
“As women’s rights are expanded and women’s abilities are demonstrated, women act to break taboos,” said Yoon. “From that point of view, a woman who smokes should be recognized as a modern woman in North Korea. This is a society where hair must be neatly tied and women must wear appropriate clothes.”
Despite the obvious harmful health impact of smoking, doing so in public can be seen as a way for women to assert their independence.
Yoon noted that in Korean culture, smoking has traditionally been considered a male pastime, but now fewer female smokers are hiding their habit in South Korea as well.
She predicted that women feeling comfortable enough to smoke in public will cause more cracks in North Korean social norms.
Translated by Claire Shinyoung Oh Lee. Written in English by Eugene Whong. Edited by Malcolm Foster.
This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by By Son Hyemin for RFA Korean.
It’s June, and a young woman is standing on a public square in a major world capital shouting: “Free China! This is still our responsibility! June 4th isn’t our history – it’s our current political reality!”
Her nickname is Queshi, a student from China who has come to London’s Trafalgar Square to mark the 34th anniversary of the bloody crackdown on weeks of student-led protests in Tiananmen Square and across China by handing out leaflets and educating passers-by about a seismic event in her country’s recent history.
Now a member of the U.K.-based protest group China Deviants, the kinship and sense of shared purpose that Queshi believes she shares with the cohort of 1989 protesters, now in their 50s, is palpable.
But where does it come from?
It comes, at least in part, from the fact that many of those who stood up on Tiananmen Square, the seat of the ruling Chinese Communist Party, to demand democracy and the rule of law were young women like her.
“What do I hope to achieve by coming out onto the street? I want to shout at the top of my voice,” Queshi told Radio Free Asia.
In addition to events commemorating Tiananmen Square, Queshi holds activities related to women’s issues. (Provided by China Deviants)
“It has always been so much easier for men to grab the podium – why? Because women are told to behave well, and to keep quiet, so we always get men’s voices taking power, not women’s.”
“As soon as I realized this,” Queshi said, “I stopped being a good little girl, and started speaking out very loudly.”
Historical erasure
Growing up in China, Queshi had scant idea of what happened on the night that fell between June 3 and 4, 1989, when the People’s Liberation Army fired machine guns at unarmed civilians and drove tanks over protesters on the orders of supreme leader Deng Xiaoping to put an end to weeks of “counterrevolutionary turmoil” in Beijing.
She didn’t get the whole story until she arrived in the United Kingdom.
“I realized then that women’s rights can’t be separated from mainstream politics,” Queshi said. “We need a certain amount of political influence and political power to achieve those rights.”
“The Communist Party isn’t just a totalitarian regime; it’s a highly patriarchal system … in which women and ethnic minorities are just there for decoration,” she said.
When Queshi looks at historical footage and photos of the 1989 student movement, she sees that women were still very much confined to support roles, with their contributions overlooked ever since.
“When I started to learn feminist theory, like power structures, inequality and the invisible exploitation of women, I learned that women are always erased in historical accounts,” she says.
“This is actually relevant to the 1989 movement, where women worked incredibly hard, but the photos taken and the documents handed down are mostly about the men,” she says.
‘You’re the first to ask’
Former 1989 student leader Wang Chaohua agrees with Queshi.
“Her observations are pretty sharp,” Wang, who led the Peking University graduate student federation, or Gaozi.
Former 1989 student leader Wang Chaohua was one of only two women to appear on the Beijing police department’s wanted list after the 1989 crackdown. (Provided by Wang Chaohua)
Wang and fellow activist Chai Ling were the only two women to appear on the Beijing police department’s wanted list after the crackdown. She remembers being taken to the men’s dorm at Peking University by Chai, who introduced her to prominent leader Feng Congde.
The problem was that all the student leaders’ meetings were held in male college dorms, in crowded rooms packed full of young men, with the women relegated to helping from the sidelines.
“When we would go to visit other universities to see how the movement was progressing, I learned that it was the male dorm we needed to visit in each school,” Wang says. “The women activists were treated like the male activists’ secretaries.”
At 37, Wang was much older than most of her fellow activists in 1989, and her age gave her more of a platform among the undergraduates.
“My role was that I was older than everyone else, whereas Chai Ling was in a weaker position, yet she was full of passion, and had this image of someone pure and idealistic,” Wang said.
“That image was strongly appealing [to the media] all the way through the hunger strike,” she said.
But Wang doesn’t often get asked about the role of gender in 1989.
“In more than 30 years, you’re the first to ask,” she said. “The issue of gender roles has been erased from history, or at least marginalized.”
Women’s rights not mentioned
Lu Jinghua was part of an emerging breed of Beijing businesswomen in 1989. When the protests started, she shut up her clothing store and pitched in collecting donations and gathering supplies for the students.
“I saw a group of students carrying donation boxes … [saying that] some students were on hunger strike” Lu recalled, adding that many had arrived from places far from Beijing. “A lot of the protesters had come from elsewhere in China and had nothing to eat or drink.”
“We thought we local people could help them out, these young people who came from out of town,” she said. “Everyone got together to give them supplies, like cans of pop and home-made steamed buns.”
A Beijing businesswoman in 1989, Lu Jinghua closed her clothing store when the protests started and pitched in collecting donations and supplies for the students. (Provided by Lu Jinghua)
Lu moved in very different circles to Wang and Chai, and joined the Beijing Workers’ Autonomous Federation that organized workers to take part in the protests. She worked as an announcer, broadcasting updates on the movement over a tannoy in Tiananmen Square.
“We had all been traditionally educated, so we weren’t likely to have any of the more radical ideas,” Lu said, adding that she had little awareness of feminism at the time. “Maybe I had some, but its voice was very weak, and nobody made a point of bringing up the topic.”
That chimes in with Wang’s memory of the movement. She noted that women’s rights weren’t mentioned when students gathered to discuss which topics they wanted to raise with Chinese leaders.
In fact, she remembers women having more power and agency during the political turmoil of the Cultural Revolution between 1966 and 1976. Their rights once more took a back seat when Deng Xiaoping began his economic reforms in 1979, she said, but have since gotten worse.
“Over the past 20-30 years of economic reform, the bureaucrats have become rich and powerful. We often heard during the anti-corruption campaign about them having so many young women,” Wang said, adding that women had been increasingly “relegated to the position of providing sexual services in the middle of political power struggles.”
“It has become normalized — a matter of course,” she said.
A mockery
Lu agreed, noting that Chinese President Xi Jinping’s wife Peng Liyuan never uttered a word in public when a woman was found chained by the neck in an outhouse in the eastern province of Jiangxi in 2022.
“What contribution has Peng Liyuan made to [empower] Chinese women?” Lu said. “Has she visited them at a grassroots level? Does she understand their pain?”
“The Jiangxi chained woman scandal broke in March 2022 and Peng Liyuan represented Chinese women as special envoy for women and children at UNESCO,” she said. “That made a mockery of the role.”
For Queshi, women are much more front-and-center in Chinese activism today, taking a prominent role in the wave of “white paper” protests that swept the country in November.
Yet they have also paid a heavy price, with four young women – Cao Zhixin, Zhai Dengrui, Li Yuanjing and Li Siqi – detained in Beijing for taking part in the protest now being seen as symbols of the movement, including for the considerable personal cost they sustained.
Queshi said she won’t stop at commemorating the 1989 massacre, but will always include women’s rights as part of her political activism.
“Maybe letting everyone know about feminism will awaken some civic awareness in some people, and gradually lead them to criticize the entire political system,” Queshi mused. “Feminism could actually have a much bigger impact [than other approaches] in mainland China.”
Translated by Luisetta Mudie.
This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Amelia Loi for RFA Mandarin.
Ombudsman rules that hospital in Nowy Targ failed to tell Dorota Lalik, 33, that her life was in danger and could be saved by an abortion
“Stop killing us,” protesters across Poland chanted this evening, demanding the legalisation of abortion, after reports reached the media of a pregnant woman’s death in a hospital in May.
On Monday, Poland’s patients’ rights ombudsman, Bartłomiej Chmielowiec, said that the John Paul II hospital should have told 33-year-old Dorota Lalik that her life could be saved through an abortion. The hospital violated her rights by withholding the information, the ombudsman ruled.
The Russian aggression against Ukraine shows that we have not learned the lessons of history and are paying a high price for it. Future generations will also pay a significant price for our generation’s sins: fractured and destroyed families; poor social and health services; and a polluted environment. Children with mental and developmental problems are the clearest examples of the intergenerational effects of war.
The tremendous stress of war increases the chances of interpersonal violence, particularly against women. When the victims of violence are pregnant women, the intergenerational effect manifests as the increase of still births and premature births among them. Mothers who were the children of Holocaust survivors were shown to have higher levels of psychological stress and less positive parenting skills. During the siege of Sarajevo, perinatal mortality and morbidity almost doubled, and there was a significant increase in the number of children born with malformations.
By analyzing the number of people killed indirectly by the “War on Terror” in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Pakistan, Somalia, Syria, and Yemen, a report by the Costs of War Project at Brown University’s Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs estimates that the war in those countries resulted in 3.6 to 3.7 million indirect deaths, while the total death toll in those same countries could reach at least 4.5 to 4.6 million, and counting.
“Wars often kill far more people indirectly than in direct combat, particularly young children.”
Stephanie Savell, the Costs of War’s co-director and author of the report states, “wars often kill far more people indirectly than in direct combat, particularly young children.” Almost all the victims, says Savell, are from the most impoverished and marginalized populations. Most indirect war deaths are due to malnutrition, pregnancy, and birth-related problems, and infectious and chronic diseases.
According to the report, more than 7.6 million children under five in post-9/11 war zones are suffering from acute malnutrition. Malnutrition has serious long-time effects on children’s health. Among those effects are increased vulnerability to diseases, developmental delays, stunted growth, and even blindness, reports UNICEF. Those children affected with malnutrition are also prevented from achieving success in school or having meaningful work as adults.
Although using doctors, patients, and civilians as a human shield is a war crime, they are frequent targets of uncontrolled violence. Now in Sudan, Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) reports that their staff in multiple locations have been repeatedly confronted by fighters entering health facilities and stealing medicines, supplies, and vehicles. It is estimated that 70% of health facilities in areas in conflict are out of service, and 30 among them are targets of attacks.
In U.N.-sponsored health missions, I was able to see the consequences of war in countries such as Mozambique, Malawi, Angola, El Salvador, and Nicaragua, a sobering experience that left painful memories. The sadness and feeling of helplessness I saw in the eyes of women and children still haunt me.
Repeated violence has numbed us to its consequences, our senses overwhelmed by cruelty. Faced with the tragic complexity of life, we are unable to savor its sweet moments of care and tenderness. Eager to escape brutal reality, we watch the latest TV news and then mindlessly change the channel to a baking show.
But does war only produce negative effects? What we see now in Ukraine is that the Russian aggression against people of all ages—both soldiers and civilians—has produced millions of displaced people, but it has also given rise to the solidarity of Ukraine’s neighbors, who at high personal and social cost have provided refuge to tens of thousands of families fleeing the war.
Ukrainian women of all ages have also taken up arms to defend their country from Russian aggression. Currently, more than 60,000 Ukrainian women serve in the military, while tens of thousands more are helping their country as journalists, paramedics, teachers, and politicians. At the same time they continue being the center of support for their families. Because men are on the front lines, women must keep hospitals, schools and even villages themselves in operation, often without basic supplies.
Although these actions are an example of the best of the human spirit, they do not erase the harrowing cruelty of war.
This post was originally published on Common Dreams.
Leave a Reply
Thank you for visiting us. You can learn more about how we consider cases here. Please avoid sharing any personal information in the comments below and join us in making this a hate-speech free and safe space for everyone.