{"id":10305,"date":"2021-01-19T13:24:11","date_gmt":"2021-01-19T13:24:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scmp.com\/news\/hong-kong\/law-and-crime\/article\/3118383\/lawyers-hong-kong-government-argue-beijings-decision"},"modified":"2021-01-19T13:24:11","modified_gmt":"2021-01-19T13:24:11","slug":"lawyers-for-hong-kong-government-argue-beijings-decision-endorsing-co-location-arrangement-as-good-as-binding","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/2021\/01\/19\/lawyers-for-hong-kong-government-argue-beijings-decision-endorsing-co-location-arrangement-as-good-as-binding\/","title":{"rendered":"Lawyers for Hong Kong government argue Beijing\u2019s decision endorsing \u2018co-location\u2019 arrangement \u2018as good as binding\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":"A decision by China\u2019s top legislative body is \u201cas good as binding\u201d in Hong Kong, even without a formal interpretation of the Basic Law, lawyers for the local government argued in the Court of Appeal on Tuesday.Benjamin Yu SC made the assertion in response to a key question that arose in the judicial review over the government\u2019s controversial arrangement allowing the application of national laws at the cross-border high-speed rail terminus in West Kowloon since September 2018.The applicants had\u2026\n