{"id":1182042,"date":"2023-08-16T17:44:53","date_gmt":"2023-08-16T17:44:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/theintercept.com\/?p=441545"},"modified":"2023-08-16T17:44:53","modified_gmt":"2023-08-16T17:44:53","slug":"pakistan-confirms-secret-diplomatic-cable-showing-u-s-pressure-to-remove-imran-khan","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/2023\/08\/16\/pakistan-confirms-secret-diplomatic-cable-showing-u-s-pressure-to-remove-imran-khan\/","title":{"rendered":"Pakistan Confirms Secret Diplomatic Cable Showing U.S. Pressure to Remove Imran Khan"},"content":{"rendered":"

For a year<\/u> and a half, Pakistani politics has been gripped by word of a diplomatic cable said to describe U.S. State Department officials encouraging the removal of former Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan from power. Last week, The Intercept published<\/a> the contents of the cable, known internally as a cypher, which revealed U.S. diplomats pressing for the removal of Khan over his neutral stance on the conflict in Ukraine.<\/p>\n

Since it was published, the response to the story from Pakistani and U.S. officials has been both defensive and contradictory.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n
\n

\n Most Read <\/h2>\n
\n
\n
\n <\/p>\n
\n \"\"\n <\/div>\n
\n Secret Pakistan Cable Documents U.S. Pressure to Remove Imran Khan <\/p>\n
\n Ryan Grim, Murtaza Hussain <\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n

<\/a>\n <\/div>\n

\n <\/p>\n
\n \"\"\n <\/div>\n
\n UFO Whistleblower Kept Security Clearance After Psychiatric Detention <\/p>\n
\n Ken Klippenstein <\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n

<\/a>\n <\/div>\n

\n <\/p>\n
\n \"\"\n <\/div>\n
\n Fox Executives Are Pouring Cash Into Joe Manchin\u2019s Campaign <\/p>\n
\n Daniel Boguslaw <\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n

<\/a>\n <\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n

<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

Pakistan\u2019s leadership quickly began to question the authenticity of the document. Former Foreign Minister Bilawal Bhutto Zardari \u2014 who is part of the political opposition to Khan \u2014 had gone public suggesting<\/a> that the published cable was \u201cinauthentic,\u201d arguing that \u201canything can be typed up on a piece of paper.\u201d Even so, he blamed Khan and said the former prime minister should be tried under Pakistan\u2019s Official Secrets Act for potentially leaking classified documents.<\/p>\n

Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, in the days after the cable was reported, told local media that the leak represented a \u201cmassive crime,\u201d while hedging about whether its contents were true. Just days later, though, Sharif confirmed the document in an interview<\/a> with The Guardian. \u201cKhan said he had the [cable] but he had lost it,\u201d Sharif, who handed over the government to a caretaker prime minister on Monday, said. \u201cNow it has been published on a website.\u201d<\/p>\n

Neither Sharif nor Bhutto Zardari have provided evidence of Khan\u2019s involvement in the leak of the document, which was provided to The Intercept by a source inside the Pakistani military. On Wednesday, a month after it announced an investigation, the Pakistani government filed charges against Khan for mishandling and misusing the cable.<\/p>\n

Despite confirming the document\u2019s authenticity, Sharif said that the cable \u2014 which quoted U.S. diplomats, furious with Khan for his alleged \u201caggressive neutrality\u201d toward Russia, threatening Pakistan with \u201cisolation\u201d should he stay in power \u2014 did not represent a conspiracy against the former prime minister.<\/p>\n

The self-contradictory three-step move \u2014 to simultaneously question the document\u2019s authenticity, blame Khan for leaking it in what amounts to a treasonous act, and then add that the substance of the cable is unremarkable \u2014 has characterized the Pakistani and State Department response over the past week.<\/p>\n

On the U.S. side, the State Department had previously dismissed claims by Khan that the U.S. had pressured him to be removed from power. After the disclosure of the leaked cable, State Department officials told The Intercept that they could not comment on the accuracy of a foreign government document but argued that the comments did not show the U.S. taking sides in Pakistani politics. \u201cNothing in these purported comments shows the United States taking a position on who the leader of Pakistan should be,\u201d State Department spokesperson Matt Miller said in a statement to The Intercept.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n