{"id":1314,"date":"2020-12-07T07:30:49","date_gmt":"2020-12-07T07:30:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.radiofree.org\/?p=134131"},"modified":"2020-12-07T07:30:49","modified_gmt":"2020-12-07T07:30:49","slug":"does-censoring-the-radical-right-on-social-media-work","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/2020\/12\/07\/does-censoring-the-radical-right-on-social-media-work\/","title":{"rendered":"Does censoring the radical right on social media work?"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>\n

I tracked radical right actors over time and got an insight about where platforms draw the line: whilst content that is considered newsworthy or posted by \u2018public figures\u2019 is allowed, movements and subgroups that actively mobilize people into action do cross the line. Actors on the right seem to be aware of platforms\u2019 takedowns to a certain extent. Movements or subgroups that were not removed from mainstream platforms posted noticeably less, or were even completely silent. This suggests that platforms\u2019 censorship has a chilling effect<\/a> on the free behavior of these actors.<\/em> Lars Erik Berntzen and Man\u00e8s Weisskircher show how local Pegida Facebook pages remained quiet<\/a> after pages of other Pegida subgroups were removed. This is a strategy to remain under the radar, whilst at the same time remaining a group where people could come together and read up on old content that was posted.<\/p>\n

Tracking networks might give an indication of what stays and what goes on platforms. Yet, it does not go into a more fine grained understanding of why some content was removed, whether this was done by the platform or by the page owner themselves. Neither does it show at what time removal took place and what the direct reasons behind decisions of censorship were. Moreover, it also does not provide insight in less visible forms of moderation, such as \u2018shadow-bans<\/a>\u2019. In such cases content is not removed, but is algorithmically ranked lower, making it less visible to viewers. Nigel Farage argued that Facebook did this with UKIP\u2019s<\/a> posts back in 2017.<\/p>\n

Censorship leads to various responses on the radical right. Migration to other platforms, such as Parler, is a common strategy.<\/strong> In 2016, removal of alt-right influencers led to the creation of the platform Gab<\/a>. The Russian platform VKontakte<\/a> or gamer apps such as Discord form other popular refuges. We can also see that movements now use closed off Facebook groups rather than public pages to coordinate actions. The large-scale Yellow Vests<\/a> protests in France were an example of this, just as the Stop the Steal group<\/a> that recently was banned by Facebook. Actors do not just shift their activities, but they also change their strategies. Remaining quiet<\/a> is an example, just as using coded-language<\/a> to make hateful speech more hidden and less obvious.<\/p>\n

At the moment, still little is known about the consequences of censorship. Tracking the movements of groups and individuals across platforms is a tricky matter. Not only is it technically difficult to get comparable data from different platforms, the increased number of \u2018alternative tech\u2019 platforms, such as Gab and Parler, not to mention messaging apps, makes it hard to track the movements of individuals.<\/p>\n

Moreover, while studies have linked the radicalization to watching online content and frequenting certain platforms, individuals who decide to use these platforms might already be more radical than those who stay away. While social media have been linked to the success of the radical right, we do not know much about how censorship from these platforms actually reduces support for the radical right. Removing radical actors from mainstream platforms can, on the one hand, significantly reduce their audiences, but it can also contribute to increased feelings of resentment and victimhood, forming a breeding ground for even stronger discontent.<\/p>\n\n

This post was originally published on Radio Free<\/a>. <\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

I tracked radical right actors over time and got an insight about where platforms draw the line: whilst content that is considered newsworthy or posted by \u2018public figures\u2019\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":165,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1314"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/165"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1314"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1314\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1315,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1314\/revisions\/1315"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1314"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1314"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1314"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}