{"id":1319935,"date":"2023-11-09T09:57:26","date_gmt":"2023-11-09T09:57:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.thecanary.co\/?p=1671634"},"modified":"2023-11-09T09:57:26","modified_gmt":"2023-11-09T09:57:26","slug":"home-office-holding-refugees-on-the-bibby-stockholm-in-quasi-detention","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/2023\/11\/09\/home-office-holding-refugees-on-the-bibby-stockholm-in-quasi-detention\/","title":{"rendered":"Home Office holding refugees on the Bibby Stockholm in \u2018quasi-detention\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>

A document released by Dorset Council has revealed that it and the Home Office are actively discouraging refugees they’re holding on the Bibby Stockholm from leaving. Campaign group One Life To Live<\/a> has said that this amounts to “quasi-detention”.<\/p>\n

Bibby Stockholm: refugees effectively stuck on board<\/h2>\n

Dorset Council, which is responsible for health and safety on board the Bibby Stockholm barge and which is a member of the multi-agency forum (MAF) for the site, released the latest joint MAF update on 7 November. This revealed that asylum-seekers accommodated there are being confined to the barge as much as possible, and should be deterred from getting off the bus which is provided to take them into local towns.<\/p>\n

The provision of the bus is a requirement of the contract<\/a> between CTM and the Home Office. However, the latest MAF update states:<\/p>\n

\n

There have also been concerns that [the bus] service means that asylum seekers are just being dropped-off and left to \u2018hang out\u2019 in Weymouth and Portland. This is not happening, nor is it in anyone\u2019s interest for it to happen… There are also be [sic] exercise, recreational and multi-faith facilities on board to minimise the need to leave the site.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

The update was signed off as usual by Paul Beecroft of the communications team at Dorset Council, with the words \u201cSent on behalf of the MAF group\u201d \u2013 indicating the agreement of all MAF members. Besides Dorset Council these include the Home Office, Portland Port, Dorset NHS, and Dorset Police. MAF meetings are held regularly, and invitees include elected members from the local authorities (town, district and county), MPs, voluntary and community sector partners, and local businesses.<\/p>\n

Now, a campaign group has said this amounts to quasi-detention.<\/p>\n

What is quasi-detention?<\/strong><\/h2>\n

The\u00a0Home Office factsheet<\/a> for the Bibby Stockholm site says that it provides \u201cnon-detained accommodation\u201d. However, many campaigners, NGOs, and immigration lawyers have long maintained that the barge represents quasi-detention.<\/p>\n

According to the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Immigration Detention (whose members are cross-party MPs and peers), asylum accommodation sites can be \u2018accurately described\u2019 as quasi-detention<\/a> if they include:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Visible security measures.<\/li>\n
  2. Shared living quarters.<\/li>\n
  3. Reduced levels of privacy.<\/li>\n
  4. Isolation from the wider community.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    All of these apply at the Bibby Stockholm site.<\/p>\n

    (1): visible security measures<\/strong><\/h2>\n

    Security on board is provided by ICSA, a private contractor, which has assigned a team of \u201c18 guards trained to military standard<\/a>\u201d. There are\u00a0security cameras<\/a>\u00a0in all communal spaces and along the corridors on each floor. Whenever leaving or returning to the Bibby Stockholm, asylum-seekers undergo\u00a0airport-style security<\/a>, including x-rays of their possessions. They cannot walk to anywhere other than the small compound at the head of the barge, which is surrounded by\u00a020-foot-high<\/a>\u00a0spiked metal fences and heavy metal gates. To get out of the compound, they must take a scheduled shuttle bus.<\/p>\n

    (2) and (3): shared living quarters and reduced levels of privacy<\/strong><\/h2>\n

    Cabins on board the Bibby Stockholm, designed for single occupancy, now have\u00a0bunk beds<\/a>\u00a0and people must\u00a0share with strangers<\/a>. Each person\u2019s living space is\u00a0smaller than the average car-park bay<\/a>.<\/p>\n

    (4): isolation from the wider community<\/strong><\/h2>\n

    To leave the port, asylum-seekers must take a shuttle bus out of the compound, across the port and out of its gates. The bus is arranged by Portland Port and paid for out of\u00a0CTM\u2019s \u00a31.6bn contract <\/a>with the Home Office. According to\u00a0page 18 of Annex A<\/a>\u00a0to that contract,\u00a0the Home Office must approve the timetables and destinations for the bus. It is understood that there are two stops on the bus route: Victoria Square on the island of Portland, and Commercial Road in Weymouth (on the mainland).<\/p>\n

    The MAF update comment about the shuttle bus service is at odds with the way buses are generally understood to operate \u2013 which is that passengers may dismount at the appointed stops, and are then free to do as they wish (including \u2018hanging around\u2019).<\/p>\n

    Furthermore, \u2018exercise and recreational\u2019 facilities onboard are extremely limited. Many public spaces have been converted to cabins; the gym contains just two treadmills (for an eventual cohort of\u00a0425 men<\/a>); and even the basketball is not freely available but must be signed in and out \u2013 apparently because it could be used as a weapon.<\/p>\n

    As a result, the men feel demoralised about this and rarely sign the basketball out.<\/p>\n

    Nicola David of One Life To Live<\/a>, which campaigns against the large-scale asylum containment sites, commented:<\/p>\n

    \n

    Placing asylum-seekers away from communities, and attempting to contain them there while restricting their freedom to move about, drives a public perception that they have done something very wrong or even criminal, which inevitably and unfairly tarnishes public sentiment towards them. In fact, these asylum-seekers have done exactly what we would all do if we faced war, conflict or persecution \u2013 flee for our lives.<\/p>\n

    The Bibby Stockholm residents are here legally and they are not criminals. Therefore there is no legal or ethical reason to segregate and contain these asylum-seekers, or to restrict their freedom. This is quasi-detention, pure and simple.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

    Discrimination and segregation<\/strong><\/h2>\n

    Under Section 13 of the\u00a0Equality Act 2010<\/a>, and specifically Section 149 (the public-sector equality duty), segregation on the grounds of race, colour, nationality, ethnic\/national origin or religion is unlawfully discriminatory. Nevertheless, residents of the Bibby Stockholm have been sent to live in a contained space away from local amenities and segregated from the local population \u2013 which is overwhelmingly White British.<\/p>\n

    Attempting to prevent them from leaving the barge, and preferring that they do not dismount from the shuttle bus contractually provided for their exclusive use, would appear discriminatory.<\/p>\n

    Only asylum-seekers who have been in the UK since 7 March 2023, and whose asylum claims are already being processed, are eligible to be sent to the Bibby Stockholm. A high proportion of the cohort\u00a0came here by plane<\/a>; they also claimed asylum immediately on arrival in the UK, exactly as required. They should not be treated as if they are here illegally or as if they have committed a crime.<\/p>\n

    In a\u00a0Guardian<\/em> report<\/a>\u00a0on 29 October, one barge resident said:<\/p>\n

    \n

    We have exactly the feeling of being in prison. It is true that they say that this is not a prison and you can go outside at any time, but you can only go to specific stops at certain times by bus, and this does not give me a good feeling. Even to use the fresh air, you have to go through the inspection every time and go to the small yard with high fences and go through the X-ray machine again. And this is not good for our health. In short, this is a prison whose prisoners are not criminals, they are people who have fled their country just to save their lives and have taken shelter here to live.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

    Featured image via\u00a0Ashley Smith\/Wikimedia Commons<\/a>, resized to 1910\u00d71000 under licence\u00a0CC BY-SA 4.0<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n

    By The Canary<\/a><\/p>\n\n

    This post was originally published on Canary<\/a>. <\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    A document released by Dorset Council has revealed that it and the Home Office are actively discouraging refugees they\u2019re holding on the Bibby Stockholm \u2026 <\/p>\n