{"id":1376518,"date":"2023-12-07T06:58:18","date_gmt":"2023-12-07T06:58:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.counterpunch.org\/?p=307005"},"modified":"2023-12-07T06:58:18","modified_gmt":"2023-12-07T06:58:18","slug":"the-washington-post-gratuitously-and-wrongly-trashes-jimmy-carter","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/2023\/12\/07\/the-washington-post-gratuitously-and-wrongly-trashes-jimmy-carter\/","title":{"rendered":"The\u00a0Washington Post\u00a0Gratuitously and Wrongly Trashes Jimmy Carter"},"content":{"rendered":"\"\"<\/a>\n
\"\"

Jimmy Carter working at his desk – Public Domain<\/p><\/div>\n

\u201cIn 1978, a\u00a0Washington Post<\/em>\u00a0editorial described what many of President Jimmy Carter\u2019s critics felt was missing from Mr. Carter\u2019s foreign policy: \u201cthe sense of design, of architecture of\u00a0knowing what he was doing<\/em>, that Henry Kissinger conveyed widely, even to detractors.\u201d\u00a0 (Washington Post<\/em>\u00a0editorial, December 1, 2023)<\/p>\n

The mainstream media, including the\u00a0Washington Post<\/em>\u00a0and the\u00a0New York Times<\/em>\u00a0are gradually getting out of the editorial business.\u00a0 Whereas there were several editorials each day in the\u00a0Post<\/em>\u00a0and the\u00a0Times<\/em>, now there is typically only one.\u00a0 Many readers, myself included, have stopped reading these editorials because they tend to be group-think exercises on weighty public issues that have no bite or original point of view.\u00a0 There is a similar problem at the Central Intelligence Agency, where National Intelligence Estimates are group-think exercises that represent the entire intelligence community.\u00a0 As a result, like editorials, intelligence estimates are lowest common denominator documents that eliminate sharp opinions and original ideas.\u00a0 I should add that the late Henry A. Kissinger felt the same way about CIA estimates and, as a result, didn\u2019t read them.<\/p>\n

Last week, the\u00a0Post<\/em>\u00a0published a bizarre and outrageous editorial on Kissinger\u2019s legacy that weakly concluded that his legacy \u201cwas still up for debate.\u201d\u00a0 But planted in the middle of the mealy editorial was an unusual criticism of the foreign policy of President Carter, which was gratuitous and wrong-headed.<\/p>\n

Carter\u2019s accomplishments in foreign policy rivaled those of any of the post-World War II presidents.\u00a0 He ignored advice from the Department of State not to engage in a Panama Canal treaty, which was a major political and policy achievement.\u00a0 He outmaneuvered conservative opposition to his diplomacy and ignored public opinion polling that showed three-quarters of the American people were opposed to the treaty.<\/p>\n

President Richard Nixon conducted the opening to China in 1972, and Carter finished the job with the exchange of diplomatic relations with China in 1979.\u00a0 Once again, Carter had to deal with conservative opposition to severing diplomatic ties with Taiwan and revoking the Mutual Defense Treaty with Taiwan.\u00a0 Carter\u2019s treaty abrogation was challenged in the Federal district court, where he lost, but he ultimately won in the Appeals Court.\u00a0 Carter also negotiated mutually beneficial trade agreements with China, which our most recent presidents have been unable to do.<\/p>\n

Kissinger received plaudits from the\u00a0Post<\/em>\u00a0for his shuttle diplomacy with Egypt and Syria, but Carter\u2019s Camp David process brought Israelis and Egyptians together in a way that ensured there could not be another Arab-Israeli war.\u00a0 Without Egypt in the Arab coalition against Israel, the Arab states could no longer gang up on Israel.\u00a0 It was Carter who shepherded Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin and Egypt\u2019s Anwar Sadat through two weeks of very tough negotiations.\u00a0 Carter should have won a Nobel Peace Prize because, not since President Theodore Roosevelt\u2019s role in ending the Russo-Japanese War in 1905, had a U.S. president so effectively mediated a dispute between two nations.\u00a0 The Post credits Kissinger with orchestrating the \u201cdeep entanglement of the United States in the Middle East,\u201d but it\u2019s becoming more apparent that the Middle East is the United States\u2019 briar patch and we have no way of getting out.<\/p>\n

Unlike Kissinger, who had no regard for democratic values in the making of national security policy, Carter\u2019s \u201cdesign\u201d for foreign policy stressed the importance of the rule of law, universal human rights, self-determination, and the avoidance of military intervention.\u00a0 Whereas\u00a0 Kissinger orchestrated the overthrow of the democratically elected government of Salvador Allende in Chile, Carter suspended military and economic aid to the authoritarian government of Augusto Pinochet.\u00a0 Kissinger supported right-wing governments in Nicaragua and El Salvador that terrorized their own people; Carter suspended aid to these Central American governments.<\/p>\n

The Post credits Kissinger with the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Vietnam, but more than a third of U.S. military fatalities in Vietnam occurred during the Nixon presidency. There were no combat deaths during the Carter presidency. \u00a0 There was never a chance that a Carter administration would conduct the kind of secret bombing that Kissinger conducted in Cambodia that led to the emergence of the Khmer Rouge and the deaths of more than 150,000 civilians.<\/p>\n

Not every Carter decision was a good one.\u00a0 Like Kissinger, Carter negotiated a strategic arms agreement with the Soviet Union, SALT II, but the Soviet intervention in Afghanistan in 1979 ensured that the Senate would never ratify the treaty.\u00a0 Carter made a big mistake in naming Zbigniew Brzezinski as his national security advisor.\u00a0 Kissinger and Brzezinski were academic rivals at Harvard University in the 1950s, and Brzezinski would never continue the kind of diplomacy that had Kissinger\u2019s name all over it.\u00a0 Carter also had difficulty negotiating between his right-of-center national security adviser, Brzezinski, and his left-of-center secretary of state, Cyrus Vance.<\/p>\n

The most bizarre aspect of the\u00a0Post<\/em>\u00a0editorial praising Kissinger\u2019s legacy was crediting him with \u201csetting the stage for some of the most momentous developments of the late 20th century,\u201d such as the collapse of the Soviet Union.\u00a0 You could make a far stronger argument that the weapons systems that were introduced during the Carter administration, which included the deployment of intermediate-range missiles and cruise missiles in Europe led to Moscow\u2019s willingness to engage in serious disarmament talks with the United States and the beginning of Moscow\u2019s geopolitical and economic decline.<\/p>\n

The post The\u00a0Washington Post\u00a0Gratuitously and Wrongly Trashes Jimmy Carter<\/a> appeared first on CounterPunch.org<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n

This post was originally published on CounterPunch.org<\/a>. <\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Unlike Kissinger, who had no regard for democratic values in the making of national security policy, Carter\u2019s \u201cdesign\u201d for foreign policy stressed the importance of the rule of law, universal human rights, self-determination, and the avoidance of military intervention.\u00a0 Whereas\u00a0 Kissinger orchestrated the overthrow of the democratically elected government of Salvador Allende in Chile, Carter suspended military and economic aid to the authoritarian government of Augusto Pinochet. More<\/a><\/p>\n

The post The\u00a0Washington Post\u00a0Gratuitously and Wrongly Trashes Jimmy Carter<\/a> appeared first on CounterPunch.org<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":200,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[22,266],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1376518"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/200"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1376518"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1376518\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1378870,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1376518\/revisions\/1378870"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1376518"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1376518"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1376518"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}