{"id":145966,"date":"2021-05-02T03:21:09","date_gmt":"2021-05-02T03:21:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dissidentvoice.org\/?p=116063"},"modified":"2021-05-02T03:21:09","modified_gmt":"2021-05-02T03:21:09","slug":"what-would-a-deep-green-new-deal-look-like-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/2021\/05\/02\/what-would-a-deep-green-new-deal-look-like-2\/","title":{"rendered":"What Would a Deep Green New Deal Look Like?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/dissidentvoice.org\/2020\/06\/how-che-guevara-taught-cuba-to-confront-covid-19\/__coverphoto200317yates\/\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-105382\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-105382\" src=\"https:\/\/dissidentvoice.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/coverPhoto200317Yates-scaled-e1598965374348.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"200\" height=\"300\" \/><\/a>The Green New Deal has attracted perhaps the greatest attention of any proposal for decades.\u00a0It would guarantee Medicare-for-All, Housing-for-All, student loan forgiveness and propose the largest economic growth in human history to address unemployment and climate change.<\/p>\n<p>But the last of these hits a stumbling block. Creation of <strong>all<\/strong> forms of energy contributes to the destruction of nature and human life.\u00a0It is possible to increase the global quality of life at the same time we reduce the use of fossil fuels and other sources of energy.\u00a0 Therefore, a \u201cdeep\u201d GND would focus on energy reduction, otherwise known as <strong>energy conservation<\/strong>.\u00a0Decreasing total energy use is a prerequisite for securing human existence.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Recognizing True Dangers<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><b>Fossil fuel (FF)<\/b> dangers are well-known and include the destruction of Life via global heating.\u00a0FF problems also include land grabs from indigenous peoples, farmers, and communities throughout the world as well as the poisoning of air from burning and destruction of terrestrial and aquatic life from spills.\u00a0But those who focus on climate change tend to minimize very real danger of other types of energy production.\u00a0 A first step in developing a genuine GND is to acknowledge the destructive potential of \u201calternative energy\u201d (AltE).<\/p>\n<p>Nuclear power (nukes).\u00a0Though dangers of nuclear disasters such as Three Mile Island, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nyjournalofbooks.com\/book-review\/chernobyl\">Chernobyl<\/a> and Fukushima are horrific, problems with the rest of its life cycle are often glossed over.\u00a0 Mining, milling, and transporting radioactive material to supply nukes with fuel and \u201cdispose\u201d of it exposes entire communities to poisoning that results in a variety of cancers.\u00a0 Though operation of nukes produces few greenhouse gases (GHGs), enormous quantities are released during production of steel, cement and other materials for building nuclear plants.\u00a0 They must be located next to water (for cooling), which means their discharge of hot water is an attack on aquatic life.\u00a0 Radioactive waste from nukes, kept in caskets for 30-50 years, threatens to poison humanity not for decades or centuries, but for millennia (or eternity), which makes nukes at least as dangerous as FFs.\u00a0 Inclusion of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nyjournalofbooks.com\/book-review\/chernobyl\">nuclear power as part of a GND<\/a> is not the slightest bit green.\u00a0 The only way to address nuclear power is how to abolish it as rapidly as possible while causing the least harm to those who depend on it for energy and income.<\/p>\n<p><b>Solar power<\/b> requires manufacturing processes with chemicals which are highly toxic to those who work with them.\u00a0 Even before production begins, many different minerals must be mined and processed, which <a href=\"https:\/\/www.localfutures.org\/what-is-energy-denial\/\">endangers workers and communities while destroying wildlife habitat<\/a>.\u00a0 Additional minerals must be obtained for batteries.\u00a0 Once solar systems are used, they are discarded into large toxic dumps.\u00a0 Though few GHGs are created during use of solar panels, large amounts are created during their life cycle.<\/p>\n<p><b>Wind power<\/b> creates its own syndrome of nerve-wracking vibrations for those living next to \u201cwind farms,\u201d along with even larger issues with disposal of 160-foot blades.\u00a0 Like solar farms, wind farms undermine ecosystems where they are located.\u00a0 The life cycle of wind power includes <a href=\"https:\/\/www.localfutures.org\/what-is-energy-denial\/\">toxic radioactive elements<\/a> to produce circular rotation of blades.<\/p>\n<p><b>Hydro-power<\/b> from dams <a href=\"https:\/\/www.resilience.org\/stories\/2019-11-03\/dammed-good-questions-about-the-green-new-deal\/\">hurts terrestrial as well as aquatic life<\/a> by altering the flow of river water.\u00a0 Dams undermine communities whose culture center around water and animals.\u00a0 Dams destroy farms.\u00a0 They exacerbate international conflicts when rivers flow through multiple countries, threaten the <a href=\"https:\/\/mronline.org\/2021\/03\/03\/from-the-murder-of-berta-caceres-to-dam-disaster-in-uttarakhand\/\">lives of construction workers<\/a>, and result in collapses which can kill over 100,000 people at a time.<\/p>\n<p>Several problems run through multiple AltE systems:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Despite claims of \u201czero emissions,\u201d every type of AltE requires large amounts of FFs during their life cycle;<\/li>\n<li>Every type of AltE is deeply intertwined with attacks on civil liberties, land grabs from indigenous communities, and\/or murders of Earth defenders;<\/li>\n<li>Many have cost overruns which undermine the budgets of communities tricked into financing them.<\/li>\n<li>Transmission lines require additional land grabs, squashing of citizen and community rights, and increased species extinctions; and,<\/li>\n<li>Since the most available resources (such as uranium for nukes, sunny land for solar arrays, mountain tops for wind farms, rivers for dams) are used first, each level of expansion requires a greater level of resource use than the previous one, which means the harvesting of AltE is <a href=\"https:\/\/mronline.org\/2021\/03\/03\/from-the-murder-of-berta-caceres-to-dam-disaster-in-uttarakhand\/\">increasingly harmful as time goes by<\/a>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Taking into account the extreme problems of the life cycle of every type of energy extraction leads to the following requirements for a genuine GND: Nuclear energy must be halted as quickly and as safely as possible with employment replacement.\u00a0 FF extraction should be dramatically reduced immediately (perhaps by 70-90% of 2020 levels) and be reduced 5-10% annually for the next 10 years thereafter.\u00a0 Rather than being increased, extraction for other forms of energy should be reduced (perhaps 2-5% annually).<\/p>\n<p>Since honesty requires recognition that every form of energy becomes more destructive with time, the critical question for a deep GND is: \u201cHow do we reduce energy use while increasing employment and the necessities of life?\u201d<\/p>\n<p><strong>The Naming of Things<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>But before exploring how to increase employment while reducing production, it is necessary to clean up some greenwashing language that has become common in recent years.<\/p>\n<p>Decades ago, Barry Commoner used the phrase \u201clinguistic detoxification\u201d to describe the way corporations come up with a word or phrase to hide the true nature of an ecological obscenity.\u00a0 One of the best examples is the nuclear industry\u2019s term \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.counterpunch.org\/2018\/08\/27\/energy-missing-from-the-nuclear-story\/\">spent fuel rods<\/a>\u201d which implies that, once used, fuel rods are not radioactive, when, in fact, they are so deadly that they must be guarded for eternity.\u00a0 An accurate term would be \u201cirradiated fuel rods.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Perhaps the classic example is the way agribusiness came up with \u201cbiosolids\u201d for renaming animal sewage sludge containing dioxin, asbestos, lead, and DDT.\u00a0 As John Stauber and Sheldon Rampton describe in <em>Toxic Sludge Is Good for You<\/em> (1995), industry persuaded the Environmental Protection Agency to reclassify <a href=\"http:\/\/greens.org\/s-r\/11\/11-23.html\">hazardous animal waste to \u201cClass A fertilizer\u201d biosolids<\/a> so they could be dumped on fields where food is grown.<\/p>\n<p>Rather than preserving traditions of early environmentalists, many current proponents of AltE use the terms \u201cclean\u201d and \u201crenewable\u201d to describe energy which is neither.\u00a0 AltE is not \u201cclean\u201d due to the many GHG emissions throughout the life cycle of all types of energy in addition to assaults on ecosystems and human health.\u00a0 Though the sun, wind and river power may be eternal, products that must be mined are very much exhaustible, meaning that no form of AltE is renewable.<\/p>\n<p>An honest GND would never refer to AltE as either \u201cclean\u201d or \u201crenewable.\u201d\u00a0 Such a GND proposal would advocate the reduction of FFs but would not suggest a goal 0% of FFs by such-and-such a date because it is unattainable.\u00a0 Every type of AltE requires FFs.\u00a0 While it may be possible to produce <strong>some<\/strong> steel and <strong>some<\/strong> cement by AltE, it is impossible to produce massive quantities of energy for the entire world with AltE.\u00a0 Instead, a genuine GND would explain that the only form of <strong>clean<\/strong> energy is <strong>less<\/strong> energy and specify ways to use less energy while improving the quality of life.<\/p>\n<p>A genuine GND would never imply that FFs are the only source of monstrously negative effects.\u00a0 Privileging AltE corporations over FF corporations is stating that environmental problems will be solved by choosing one clique of capitalists over another.\u00a0 This means that (a) if FFs should be nationalized, then all mining, milling and manufacturing processes to produced materials needed for AltE should be nationalized; and, (b) if FFs should remain in the ground, then all components for operating nuclear plants, dams, solar facilities and wind farms should also remain in the ground.<\/p>\n<p><strong>A Shorter Work Week for All<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The greatest contradiction in current versions of the GND is advocating environmental improvement while having the most massive increase in production the world has ever seen.\u00a0 These two goals are completely irreconcilable.\u00a0 A progressive GND would address this enigma via shortening the work week, which would reduce environmental damage by using less energy.<\/p>\n<p>It is quite odd that versions of the GND call for Medicare-for-All, Housing-for-All, Student Loan Forgiveness-for-All; but none of them suggest a Shorter-Work-Week-for-All.\u00a0 The absence of this old progressive demand could be due to the incorrect neoliberal assumption that the best way to solve unemployment is via increased production.<\/p>\n<p>Increased production of goods cannot create a long-term increase in employment. (It was <a href=\"https:\/\/dissidentvoice.org\/2020\/05\/soaring-beyond-the-green-new-deal\/\">WW II and <strong>not<\/strong> Roosevelt\u2019s New Deal<\/a> that consistently increased employment.)\u00a0 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.usgovernmentspending.com\/spending_chart_1913_2013USd_15s2li011mcn__US_Gross_Domestic_Product_GDP_History\">US production<\/a> increased 300-fold from <a href=\"https:\/\/www.goodreads.com\/book\/show\/2511700.Gusher_of_Lies\">1913 to 2013<\/a>.\u00a0 If employment had increased at the same pace, everyone would be working at dozens of jobs today.<\/p>\n<p>Unemployment increases from recent economic disruptions like the 2008 financial crisis and Covid in 2020 were due to the inability to shift work from some areas of the economy to others.\u00a0 A planned shrinking of the economy would require including the entire workforce in deciding to shift from negative to positive employment.<\/p>\n<p>As the work week is reduced, every group of workers should evaluate what it does, how labor is organized, and how jobs should be redefined so that full employment is preserved.\u00a0 The only part of this idea which is novel is making changes democratically \u2013 job categories continuously change, with some types of work shrinking (or disappearing entirely) and other types of work expanding or coming into existence.\u00a0 Just as economic growth does not guarantee increases in employment, economic shrinking need not worsen unemployment if the work week is shortened.<\/p>\n<p>However, a shorter work week will not accomplish environmental goals if it is accompanied by an \u201cintensification of labor\u201d (such as requiring workers at Amazon to handle more packages per hour or increasing class size for teachers).\u00a0 This means that a genuine GND requires workers\u2019 forming strong unions which have a central role in determining what is produced as well as working conditions.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Producing According to Need Instead of According to Profit<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>If a core part of a GND becomes a shorter work week (without speed-up), the question naturally arises: \u201cWill lowering the amount of production result in people going without basic necessities of life?\u201d\u00a0 It is important to understand that production for profit causes the manufacture of goods that have no part of improving our lives.<\/p>\n<p>Current versions of the GND are based on the neoliberal assumption that the best way to provide for necessities of life is through increased payments for purchases (ie, market economics).\u00a0 A progressive GND would advocate that the best way to provide the necessities of life is by guaranteeing them as human rights.\u00a0 This is often referred so as replacing individual wages with \u201csocial wages.\u201d\u00a0 For example, the neoliberal approach to healthcare is offering medical insurance while a progressive approach is to offer medical care directly (without giving a cut to insurance companies). Likewise, a neoliberal GND would offer cash for food, housing, transportation, education and other necessities while a progressive GND would provide them directly to people.\u00a0 Green economics must be based on making dollar amounts less important by replacing individual wages with social wages.<\/p>\n<p>Current versions of the GND seek to provide necessities by increasing the quantity of products rather than focusing on creating things that are useful, reliable and durable. A massive increase in production is an unnecessary attack on ecosystems when there is already much more production than required to provide essentials for everyone on the planet.\u00a0 Needs are not being met because of production which \u2026<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>&#8230; is <strong>negative<\/strong>, including war materials, police forces and production which destroys farmland and habitat (all of which should be reduced immediately);<\/li>\n<li>&#8230; is <strong>wasteful<\/strong>, which includes both (a) playthings of the richest 1%, and (b) things which many of us are forced to buy for survival and getting to work, the most notable being cars;<\/li>\n<li>&#8230; requires <strong>unnecessary<\/strong> processing and transportation, the most notable example being food which is processed to lose nutritional value, packaged to absurd levels, and shipped over 1000 miles before being consumed; and,<\/li>\n<li>\u2026 involves <strong>planned obsolescence<\/strong>, including design to fall apart or go out of style.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>One important aspect of reducing production is often ignored.\u00a0 Each product manufactured must have a <strong>repairability index<\/strong>.\u00a0 At a minimum, <a href=\"https:\/\/grist.org\/climate\/why-frances-new-repairability-index-is-a-big-deal\/?utm_medium=email&amp;utm_source=newsletter&amp;utm_campaign=daily\">criteria for the index<\/a> should include (a) availability of technical documents to aid in repair, (b) ease of disassembly, (c) availability of spare parts, (d) price of spare parts, and (e) repair issues specific to the class of products. The index should become a basis for strengthening production requirements each year.\u00a0 A <strong>durablility index<\/strong> should similarly be developed and strengthened annually.\u00a0 Since those who do the labor of manufacturing products are more likely than owners or stockholders to attain knowledge of how to make commodities that are more reliable and durable, they must have the right to make their knowledge public without repercussions from management.<\/p>\n<p>There will always be differences of opinion regarding what is needed versus what is merely desired.\u00a0 A progressive GND should state how those decisions would be made.\u00a0 A major cause of unnecessary production is that decisions concerning what to manufacture and standards for creating them are made by investors and corporate bosses rather than community residents and workers manufacturing them.\u00a0 A genuine GND would confront problems regarding what is produced by involving all citizens in economic decisions, and not merely the richest.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Reparations!<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Perhaps the issue which is least likely to be linked to the GND is reparations to poor communities in Africa, Latin America, and Asia who have been victims of Western imperialism for 500 years.\u00a0 This connection forces us to ask: \u201cSince most minerals necessary for AltE lie in poor countries, will rich countries continue to plunder their resources, exterminate what remains of indigenous cultures, force inhabitants to work for a pittance, jail and kill those who resist, destroy farmland, and leave the country a toxic wasteland for generations to come?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>For example, plans to massively expand electric vehicles (EVs) undermine the vastly more sustainable approach of urban redesign for walkable\/cyclable communities.\u00a0 Plans would result in manufacturing EVs for the rich world while poor and working class communities would suffer from the extraction of <a href=\"https:\/\/countercurrents.org\/2019\/06\/lithium-the-next-suicidal-solution-to-the-fossil-fuel-climate-crisis\/\">lithium<\/a>, cobalt and dozens of other materials required for these cars.<\/p>\n<p>Africa may be the most mineral-rich continent.\u00a0 In addition to <a href=\"https:\/\/grist.org\/article\/report-going-100-renewable-power-means-a-lot-of-dirty-mining\/?utm_medium=email&amp;utm_source=newsletter&amp;utm_campaign=daily\">cobalt<\/a> from the Democratic Republic of the Congo for EVs, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.counterpunch.org\/2021\/04\/15\/the-clandestine-war-on-africa-frances-endgame-in-mali\/\">Mali<\/a> is the source of 75% of the uranium for French nukes, <a href=\"https:\/\/popularresistance.org\/zambia-is-the-tip-of-the-tail-of-the-global-dog\/\">Zambia<\/a> is mined for copper for AltE and hundreds of other minerals are taken from dozens of African countries.<\/p>\n<p>If there are to be agreements involving corporations seeking minerals for AltE, who will those agreements be with?\u00a0 Will the agreements be between the ultra-rich owners of the Western empire and its puppet governments?\u00a0 Or, will extraction agreements be with villages and communities which will be most affected by removal of minerals for the production of energy?<\/p>\n<p>Discussions of relationships between rich and poor countries make much of having \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ilo.org\/dyn\/normlex\/en\/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_ILO_CODE:C169\">free, prior and informed consent<\/a>\u201d prior to an extraction project.\u00a0 Such an agreement is far from reality because (a) corporate and governmental bodies are so mired in corruption that they contaminate bodies which define and judge the meaning of \u201cfree, prior and informed,\u201d (b) no prediction of the effects of extraction can be \u201cinformed\u201d since it is impossible to know what the interaction of the multitude of physical, chemical, biological and ecological factors will be prior to extraction taking place, and (c) affected communities are typically bullied into accepting extraction because they fear that families will die from starvation, lack of medical care or unemployment if they do not do so.\u00a0 Thus, the following are essential components of a socially just GND:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Reparations which are sufficient to eliminate poverty must be <strong>paid<\/strong> <strong>prior<\/strong> to signing extraction agreements; and,<\/li>\n<li>Every community must have the <strong>right to<\/strong> <strong>terminate<\/strong> an extraction agreement at any stage of the project.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>This is where the other meaning of \u201cdeep\u201d comes in.\u00a0 When people hear \u201cdeep green,\u201d they often think of how industrial activity deeply affects ecosystems.\u00a0 \u201cDeep\u201d can also refer to having a deep respect for poor communities whose lives are most affected by extraction.\u00a0 Respect is not deep if it is unwilling to accept an answer of \u201cNo\u201d to a request for exorbitant, profit-gouging extraction.\u00a0 Peoples across the world may decide that since they have received so little for so long, it may be time for rich countries to share the wealth they have stolen and dig up new wealth much, much more slowly.<\/p>\n<p><strong>A New Green Culture<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Just to make sure that it is clear and not forgotten, the fundamental question regarding extraction of material needed for AltE is: \u201cWill rich countries continue to plunder minerals underneath or adjacent to poor communities at a rate that corporations decide?\u00a0 Will they expect poor communities to be satisfied with a vague promise that, for the very first time, great things will happen after the plundering?\u00a0 Or should reparations be fully paid for past and current plundering, with poor communities deciding how much extraction they will allow and at what speed?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Essential for building a New Green World is the creation of a New Green Culture which asks all of the billions of people on the planet to share their ideas for obtaining the necessities of life while using less energy.\u00a0 Such a culture would aim for one idea to spark to many ideas, all of which strive more toward living together than on inventing energy-guzzling gadgets.<\/p>\n<p>In order to build a New Green Culture which puts the sharing of wealth above personal greed, several things that must happen:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>To bring billions of people out of economic misery, every country should establish a <strong>maximum income<\/strong> which is a multiple of the minimum income, with that multiple being voted on (no less than every five years) by all living in the country.<\/li>\n<li>Every country should establish a <strong>maximum wealth<\/strong> which is a multiple of the minimum wealth, with that multiple being voted on (no less than every five years) by all living in the country.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Global reparations<\/strong>, including sharing wealth and technological know-how between rich and poor countries, is essential for overcoming past and ongoing effects of imperialism. Establishing maximum incomes and maximum wealth possession within countries must be quickly followed by establishing such maximum levels between countries.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>A core problem of current versions of the GND is that they propose to solve employment, social justice and energy problems with increased production, which is not necessary to solve any of these.\u00a0 Attempts to solve problems by increasing wealth feeds into the corporate culture of greed and become a barrier to creation of a New Green Culture.\u00a0 Increasing production beyond what is necessary increases environmental problems that threaten the Earth.\u00a0 It tells those who are already rich that they should grab more, more and more.\u00a0 It tells those who are not rich that happiness depends upon the possession of objects.\u00a0 The survival of Humanity depends on the building of a green culture that prizes sharing above all else.<\/p>\n<p>(A webinar at 7 pm CT on May 5, 2021 on \u201c<strong>Envisioning a Greener New Deal<\/strong>\u201d will explore concerns with alternative energy, the need for global reparations and ask how to create a better world while using much less energy.\u00a0 Email the address of the author below for details.)<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/dissidentvoice.org\/2021\/05\/what-would-a-deep-green-new-deal-look-like\/_imagepritism\/\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-116104\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-116104\" src=\"https:\/\/dissidentvoice.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/imagePritiSM-e1619929387258.jpeg\" alt=\"\" width=\"400\" height=\"292\" \/><\/a><\/p>The post <a href=\"https:\/\/dissidentvoice.org\/2021\/05\/what-would-a-deep-green-new-deal-look-like\/\">What Would a Deep Green New Deal Look Like?<\/a> first appeared on <a href=\"https:\/\/dissidentvoice.org\/\">Dissident Voice<\/a>.\n<p class=\"syndicated-attribution\">This post was originally published on <a href=\"https:\/\/dissidentvoice.org\/2021\/05\/what-would-a-deep-green-new-deal-look-like\/\">Dissident Voice<\/a>. <\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Green New Deal has attracted perhaps the greatest attention of any proposal for decades.\u00a0It would guarantee Medicare-for-All, Housing-for-All, student loan forgiveness and propose the largest economic growth in human history to address unemployment and climate change. But the last of these hits a stumbling block. Creation of all forms of energy contributes to the [\u2026]<\/p>\n<p>The post <a href=\"https:\/\/dissidentvoice.org\/2021\/05\/what-would-a-deep-green-new-deal-look-like\/\">What Would a Deep Green New Deal Look Like?<\/a> first appeared on <a href=\"https:\/\/dissidentvoice.org\/\">Dissident Voice<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":181,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3340,11427,6207,3193],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/145966"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/181"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=145966"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/145966\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":145967,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/145966\/revisions\/145967"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=145966"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=145966"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=145966"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}