{"id":1574392,"date":"2024-03-26T12:00:00","date_gmt":"2024-03-26T12:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/theintercept.com\/?p=464307"},"modified":"2024-03-26T12:00:00","modified_gmt":"2024-03-26T12:00:00","slug":"meta-refuses-to-answer-questions-on-gaza-censorship-say-sens-warren-and-sanders","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/2024\/03\/26\/meta-refuses-to-answer-questions-on-gaza-censorship-say-sens-warren-and-sanders\/","title":{"rendered":"Meta Refuses to Answer Questions on Gaza Censorship, Say Sens. Warren and Sanders"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
Citing the company\u2019s<\/u> \u201cfailure to provide answers to important questions,\u201d Sens. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., and Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., are pressing Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram, to respond to reports of disproportionate censorship around the Israeli war on Gaza.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cMeta insists that there\u2019s been no discrimination against Palestinian-related content on their platforms, but at the same time, is refusing to provide us with any evidence or data to support that claim,” Warren told The Intercept. “If its ad-hoc changes and removal of millions of posts didn\u2019t discriminate against Palestinian-related content, then what\u2019s Meta hiding?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In a letter to Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg sent last December, first reported by The Intercept<\/a>, Warren presented the company with dozens of specific questions about the company\u2019s Gaza-related content moderation efforts. Warren asked about the exact numbers of posts about the war, broken down by Hebrew or Arabic, that have been deleted or otherwise suppressed. <\/p>\n\n\n\n The letter was written following widespread<\/a> reporting<\/a> in The Intercept and other outlets that detailed how posts on Meta platforms<\/a> that are sympathetic<\/a> to Palestinians<\/a>, or merely depicting<\/a> the destruction<\/a> in Gaza, are routinely removed or hidden<\/a> without explanation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A month later, Meta replied<\/a> to Warren\u2019s office with a six-page letter, obtained by The Intercept, that provided an overview of its moderation response to the war but little in the way of specifics or new information.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Meta\u2019s reply disclosed some censorship: “In the nine days following October 7, we removed or marked as disturbing more than 2,200,000 pieces of content in Hebrew and Arabic for violating our policies.” The company declined, however, to provide a breakdown of deletions by language or market, making it impossible to tell whether that figure reflects discriminatory moderation practices. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Much of Meta\u2019s letter is a rehash of an update it provided through its public relations portal<\/a> at the war\u2019s onset, some of it verbatim.<\/p>\n\n\n\n