In a landmark ruling for fundamental freedoms in Colombia, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights found that for over two decades the state government harassed, surveilled, and persecuted members of a lawyer\u2019s group that defends human rights defenders, activists, and indigenous people, putting the attorneys\u2019 lives at risk. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
The ruling<\/a> is a major victory for civil rights in Colombia, which has a long history of abuse and violence against human rights defenders, including murders and death threats. The case involved the unlawful and arbitrary surveillance of members of the Jose Alvear Restrepo Lawyers Collective (CAJAR<\/a>), a Colombian human rights organization defending victims of political persecution and community activists for over 40 years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The court found that since at least 1999, Colombian authorities carried out a constant campaign of pervasive secret surveillance of CAJAR members and their families. That state violated their rights to life, personal integrity, private life, freedom of expression and association, and more, the Court said. It noted the particular impact experienced by women defenders and those who had to leave the country amid threat, attacks, and harassment for representing victims. <\/p>\n\n\n\n The decision is the first by the Inter-American Court to find a State responsible for violating the right to defend human rights. The court is a human rights tribunal that interprets and applies the American Convention on Human Rights, an international treaty ratified by over 20 states in Latin America and the Caribbean. <\/p>\n\n\n\n In 2022, EFF, Article 19, Fundaci\u00f3n Karisma, and Privacy International, represented by Berkeley Law\u2019s International Human Rights Law Clinic<\/a>, filed an amicus brief<\/a> in the case. EFF and partners urged the court to rule that Colombia\u2019s legal framework regulating intelligence activity and the surveillance of CAJAR and their families violated a constellation of human rights and forced them to limit their activities, change homes, and go into exile to avoid violence, threats, and harassment. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Colombia’s intelligence network was behind abusive surveillance practices in violation of the American Convention and did not prevent authorities from unlawfully surveilling, harassing, and attacking CAJAR members, EFF told the court. Even after Colombia enacted a new intelligence law, authorities continued to carry out unlawful communications surveillance against CAJAR members, using an expansive and invasive spying system to target and disrupt the work of not just CAJAR but other human rights defenders<\/a> and journalists<\/a>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n In examining Colombia\u2019s intelligence law and surveillance actions, the court elaborated on key Inter-American and other international human rights standards, and advanced significant conclusions for the protection of privacy, freedom of expression, and the right to defend human rights. <\/p>\n\n\n\n The court delved into criteria for intelligence gathering powers, limitations, and controls. It highlighted the need for independent oversight of intelligence activities and effective remedies against arbitrary actions. It also elaborated on standards for the collection, management, and access to personal data held by intelligence agencies, and recognized the protection of informational self-determination by the American Convention. <\/p>\n\n\n\n For more details see: https:\/\/www.eff.org\/deeplinks\/2024\/04\/historic-victory-human-rights-colombia-inter-american-court-finds-state-agencies<\/a><\/p>\n\n