{"id":1621792,"date":"2024-04-20T23:12:40","date_gmt":"2024-04-20T23:12:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/asiapacificreport.nz\/?p=100019"},"modified":"2024-04-20T23:12:40","modified_gmt":"2024-04-20T23:12:40","slug":"have-new-zealanders-really-been-misled-about-aukus-or-is-involvement-now-a-foregone-conclusion","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/2024\/04\/20\/have-new-zealanders-really-been-misled-about-aukus-or-is-involvement-now-a-foregone-conclusion\/","title":{"rendered":"Have New Zealanders really been \u2018misled\u2019 about AUKUS, or is involvement now a foregone conclusion?"},"content":{"rendered":"

ANALYSIS:<\/strong> By Marco de Jong<\/a>, Auckland University of Technology<\/a> and Robert G. Patman<\/a>, University of Otago<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n

When former prime minister Helen Clark spoke out<\/a> against New Zealand potentially compromising its independent foreign policy by joining pillar two of the AUKUS security pact, Foreign Minister Winston Peters responded bluntly<\/a>:<\/p>\n

On what could she have possibly based that statement? [\u2026] And I\u2019m saying to people, including Helen Clark, please don\u2019t mislead New Zealanders with your suspicions without any facts \u2013 let us find out what we\u2019re talking about.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Pillar one of AUKUS involves the delivery of nuclear submarines to Australia, making New Zealand membership impossible under its nuclear-free policy.<\/p>\n