{"id":18695,"date":"2021-02-02T17:14:53","date_gmt":"2021-02-02T17:14:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/radiofree.asia\/?guid=ecc5024d1b4a76ec21e562334a0547e7"},"modified":"2021-02-02T17:14:53","modified_gmt":"2021-02-02T17:14:53","slug":"biden-should-use-peace-driven-policies-to-lead-with-the-power-of-our-example","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/2021\/02\/02\/biden-should-use-peace-driven-policies-to-lead-with-the-power-of-our-example\/","title":{"rendered":"Biden Should Use Peace-Driven Policies to \u201cLead With the Power of Our Example\u201d"},"content":{"rendered":"\"First<\/a>

When it comes to war, if personnel is policy, America is yet again in deep trouble.<\/p>\n

As retired Army Major Danny Sjursen recently pointed out<\/a> at TomDispatch<\/em>, when it comes to foreign policy, President Joe Biden\u2019s new cabinet and advisers are well stocked with retired generals<\/a>, reconstituted neocons<\/a>, unapologetic hawks<\/a>, and similar war enthusiasts<\/a>. Biden himself has taken to asking God to protect the troops whenever he makes a major speech. (How about protecting them by bringing them home from our pointless wars?) \u201cDefense\u201d spending, as war spending is generally known in this country, remains at record levels at $740.5 billion for fiscal year 2021. Talk of a new cold war with Russia or China<\/a> (or both) paradoxically warms Pentagon offices and corridors with yet more funds. The only visible dove of peace at Biden\u2019s inaugural was the giant golden brooch<\/a> worn by Lady Gaga. So what exactly is to be done?<\/p>\n

Peace-driven progressive policies will not emerge easily from the rainbow kettle of hawks Biden has so far assembled, but his inaugural speech<\/a> did mention leading and inspiring others globally \u201cnot merely by the example of our power but by the power of our example.\u201d It would have been an apt rhetorical flourish indeed, if not for this country\u2019s \u201cforever wars\u201d in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Yemen, and elsewhere across the Greater Middle East and Africa. America\u2019s harsh war-fighting reality suggests that \u201cthe example of our power\u201d still remains standard operating procedure inside the Washington Beltway. How could this possibly be changed?<\/p>\n

I have a few ideas for Biden \u2014 a 10-point plan, in fact, for turning his softball rhetoric into hardball reality. Consider, Mr. President, the following powerful examples you could set as America\u2019s latest commander-in-chief:<\/p>\n

1.<\/strong> Stop the U.S. from building new generations of nuclear weapons and downsize the vast existing American arsenal, while launching global negotiations to work toward the elimination of all such arsenals. The U.S. military is set to spend well over a trillion dollars<\/a> in the coming decades to \u201cmodernize\u201d its nuclear triad of bombers and land-based and submarine-launched missiles. Such a staggering \u201cinvestment\u201d can only move the world closer to nuclear Armageddon. If America is to lead by example when it comes to the ultimate power on this planet, why not begin by cancelling this trillion-dollar-nightmare as part of a new global anti-nuclear initiative? Why not commit us, long term, to the elimination of all nuclear weapons everywhere, while moving to adopt a \u201cno-first-use<\/a>\u201d policy?<\/p>\n

2.<\/strong> When it comes to President Biden\u2019s commitment to slow climate change<\/a> and clean up the environment, why not do something in military terms? America\u2019s armed forces have an enormous appetite<\/a> for fossil fuels. The Pentagon also has a sordid record when it comes to the poisoning of the environment. (Consider the legacy of Agent Orange<\/a> in Vietnam, or the military\u2019s burn pits<\/a> in Iraq and Afghanistan, or the birth defects and severe health problems that were linked to the munitions its forces used in assaulting the Iraqi city of Fallujah<\/a> in 2004.) If the president wants to set an example when it comes to demilitarizing this over-armed, over-polluted planet of ours, reducing both the military\u2019s fossil-fuel emissions and its poisonous munitions would be a powerful way to start.<\/p>\n

3.<\/strong> End this century\u2019s forever wars and radically downsize this country\u2019s unprecedented global network of military bases. Driving the colossal size of today\u2019s military is what my old service, the Air Force, likes to call its \u201cglobal reach, global power\u201d mission. At least in theory, that mission, in turn, helps justify the sprawling network<\/a> of 800 or so overseas bases, a network that costs more than $100 billion a year to maintain. Such bases not only consume resources needed here in the U.S. and help stoke those forever wars, but they present high-value targets to opponents and incite ill-feeling and resistance from \u201chost\u201d countries. So, downsizing that global base structure would be an act of peace \u2014 and fiscal sense.<\/p>\n

4.<\/strong> Make major cuts in the country\u2019s war budget. Fewer bases and fewer or no wars should translate into a far lower defense budget. Somewhere in the neighborhood of $400 billion annually to defend this country and cover its real \u201cnational security\u201d interests seems reasonable for the self-styled lone superpower. The money saved (roughly $340 billion based on this year\u2019s budget) could then perhaps be partly rebated directly to American families in need in this pandemic. Perhaps every American family earning less than $50,000 a year could see a rebate on their taxes directly attributable to downsizing that budget and America\u2019s imperial footprint overseas. Call it a long-delayed peace dividend. Regular Americans, after all, need such \u201cdividends\u201d far more than giant defense contractors like Boeing or Raytheon. And don\u2019t get me started on the need to invest in rebuilding this nation\u2019s infrastructure<\/a> at a moment when the extremities associated with climate change threaten to devastate parts of the country.<\/p>\n

5.<\/strong> Create a Department of Peace (here\u2019s looking at you, Dennis Kucinich<\/a>) with influence at least approaching that of the so-called Department of Defense. Currently, the U.S. military is all about power projection, domination of the global battlespace, and similar buzzwords that add up to exporting violence abroad, special op by special op, drone by drone. You are what you do and the U.S. military does permanent war with plenty of \u201ccollateral damage<\/a>.\u201d (Picture mutilated<\/a> black and brown bodies and flattened and poisoned cities and towns.) If the U.S. government can create a Space Force just to fulfill the fantasies of Donald Trump, then why not a peace force, too? (America\u2019s current, humble Peace Corps asked for<\/a> $401 million for Fiscal Year 2021, roughly the cost of four<\/a> underperforming F-35 jet fighters<\/a>.) Peace, much like war, doesn\u2019t just happen. You have to work at it \u2014 and that would be precisely the mission of the Department of Peace.<\/p>\n

6.<\/strong> Pay attention<\/a>, for once, to President Dwight D. Eisenhower\u2019s 1961 farewell address and exert rigorous oversight and zealous control over the military-industrial complex. That means ending the 2001 AUMF<\/a>, the authorization for use of military force that Congress passed in a climate of panic and revenge in the immediate aftermath of 9\/11 (though it was only to be<\/a> against those associated in some fashion with those terror attacks), and the second one<\/a> Congress authorized in 2002 in preparation for the Bush administration\u2019s invasion of Iraq. They have been misused and abused by presidents ever since. Furthermore, end any conflict that hasn\u2019t been authorized by a direct Congressional declaration of war. That means withdrawing all U.S. troops from Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, and elsewhere across the Greater Middle East and Africa. America\u2019s security is not, in fact, directly threatened by those countries. As a self-declared democracy, the United States should set an example by not fighting wars disconnected from the people\u2019s will and the true needs of national defense.<\/p>\n

7.<\/strong> And speaking of President Eisenhower, America needs to embrace his lesson that military spending represents a theft<\/a> from Americans who are hungry, sick, and need help. For its \u201cnational security,\u201d this country needs more hospitals, better education, safer food, a cleaner environment, and, most of all, clean water and fresh air. Eisenhower knew that warships and warplanes were simply not the answer<\/a> to the American people\u2019s real and pressing needs.<\/p>\n

8.<\/strong> Reject threat inflation<\/a>, including the heightening talk of a \u201cnew cold war\u201d with Russia<\/a> or China<\/a> or of an ongoing \u201cgenerational<\/a>\u201d war on terror. Eliminate talk of a new Red Menace, of likely wars with Iran or North Korea, or of America\u2019s backwardness in cyberwarfare research and development. Terrorism<\/a> is nothing new and will always be with us in one form or another (including, vis-a-vis the Capitol on January 6th, domestic terrorism). Indeed, since war is<\/em> terror, a war on terror should truly be considered an oxymoron. Terrorist acts are mostly the recourse of the weak when taking on the strong. The United States isn\u2019t going to stop them by getting stronger yet. Nor are China and Russia about to invade this country. (This isn\u2019t Red Dawn<\/em><\/a>.) Iran is not coming to impose Sharia law and North Korea is not about to launch nukes against us. As for cyber-attacks, don\u2019t worry: no matter what you\u2019ve heard, no country does cyberwarfare<\/a> better than the U.S.A.<\/p>\n

9.<\/strong> End the practice of foreign aid taking the form of military aid. When taxpayers give aid to foreign countries, it should be in the form of food, medicine, and other essentials, not cluster bombs, F-16s, and Hellfire missiles<\/a>.<\/p>\n

10.<\/strong> Learn from Abraham Lincoln. In President Biden\u2019s recent Inaugural Address, as a call to national unity, he made reference<\/a> to Lincoln\u2019s initial inaugural appeal to \u201cthe better angels of our nature.\u201d But he should have focused on Lincoln\u2019s Second Inaugural Address<\/a>, the finest speech ever given by any president. As Lincoln put it then, when it came to ending the American Civil War:<\/p>\n

\n

\u201cWith malice toward none; with charity for all; with firmness in the right, as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in; to bind up the nation\u2019s wounds; to care for him who shall have borne the battle, and for his widow, and his orphan \u2014 to do all which may achieve and cherish a just, and lasting peace, among ourselves, and with all nations.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Lincoln was unafraid of speaking of and seeking a just and lasting peace. In this century, until at least the Trump years, Americans often heard their leaders speak of this nation\u2019s \u201cexceptional\u201d nature. What could be more exceptional, more laudable, than seeking a lasting global peace?<\/p>\n

Biden, like me, is Roman Catholic. My Catholic bible (Matthew 5:9) tells me that Christ said, \u201cBlessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called children of God.\u201d Instead of beseeching God to protect the troops that American presidents have continually sent into harm\u2019s way, Joe Biden might ask for blessings for America\u2019s peace activists. To echo Lincoln again, that would indeed be a case of right making might<\/a>, instead of the might-making-right vision that a militaristic America<\/a> has grown far too comfortable with.<\/p>\n

An Alert and Knowledgeable Citizenry<\/strong><\/h2>\n

So long ago, President Eisenhower spoke of<\/a> the importance of having an \u201calert and knowledgeable citizenry.\u201d Isn\u2019t it time for mainstream media outlets to foster real, critical, investigative<\/a> journalism that would truly inform those very citizens about America\u2019s wanton military spending and endless wars, while providing educators with crucial material to teach<\/a> their students about the horrific costs of militarism? This country needs to free its collective mind from the prevailing forever-war narrative. To paraphrase Crosby, Stills, and Nash, if we teach the children well<\/a>, perhaps they won\u2019t repeat their father\u2019s hell.<\/p>\n

In his song \u201cImagine,\u201d John Lennon asked us all to imagine a different world and said that it\u2019s easy if you try. Lennon got the first and most important part right, but the second part sadly doesn\u2019t apply, at least to this country in this century. Nowadays, Americans are so immersed in a culture driven by war, profit, and exploitation that it\u2019s no longer easy to imagine anything but war. If Americans truly paid attention to war, up close and as personal as they could get, they\u2019d begin to grasp the folly and wickedness of it and so perhaps relinquish what I\u2019ve come to think of as their prisoner-of-war<\/a> mentality in relation to it. They might actually begin breaking down mental barriers to peace.<\/p>\n

Don\u2019t count on Congress doing it, though. Congress is incestuously part<\/a> of what should be renamed the military-industrial-congressional complex. Don\u2019t count on the military doing it either. Its most senior men and women have been carefully selected, groomed<\/a>, and promoted because they believe in the system, which includes incessant lobbying for more weaponry and exaggerating the threats to this country to get it. They exist to wage war; the rest of us should be willing to fight for peace.<\/p>\n

Change, if and when it comes, will have to be driven by people like us.<\/p>\n

It won\u2019t be easy, but it is necessary for America\u2019s survival. And it\u2019s unlikely to come without campaign finance reform and the public funding of elections. In a \u201cpay-to-play\u201d oligarchy disguised as a democracy, the giant weapons-making corporations simply pay much more than you do and so speak through megaphones, leaving you with a dead mic. Unless the corporate dominance of our politics is curtailed, ordinary Americans will continue to be outshouted and overwhelmed by the bellicose and the greedy, leaving the country forever at war.<\/p>\n

It won\u2019t be easy to work for peace, but it sure is worth the try. It sure as hell beats the alternative of guns, bombs, and missiles being produced like so many sausages in a militaristic<\/a> country that ever more resembles George Orwell\u2019s nightmarish image<\/a> of the future as \u201ca boot stamping on a human face \u2014 forever.\u201d<\/p>\n

America\u2019s new president has called for us to lead with the power of our example rather than just the example of our power. I can\u2019t think of anything more exemplary and powerful than a strong commitment to making war no more.<\/p>\n\n

This post was originally published on Latest \u2013 Truthout<\/a>. <\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\"First<\/a><\/p>\n