{"id":192979,"date":"2021-06-06T05:54:48","date_gmt":"2021-06-06T05:54:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.rfa.org\/english\/news\/china\/philippines-southchinasea-06042021163259.html"},"modified":"2021-06-06T05:54:48","modified_gmt":"2021-06-06T05:54:48","slug":"restricted-access-trawlers-hurt-small-scale-fishermen-in-philippines","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/2021\/06\/06\/restricted-access-trawlers-hurt-small-scale-fishermen-in-philippines\/","title":{"rendered":"Restricted Access, Trawlers Hurt Small-Scale Fishermen in Philippines"},"content":{"rendered":"\n \n

Restrictions in Philippine territorial waters and the open seas, along with threats from large-scale fishing operations, are the biggest issues facing subsistence fishermen in this archipelagic country of 7,100 islands, according to an organization representing them.<\/p>\n

In recent years, governments of coastal municipalities have begun restricting their \u201cmunicipal fishing grounds,\u201d or waters up to 15 km (9 miles) from the shore, allowing only resident fishermen who register with local authorities, said Fernando Hicap, chairman of Pamalakaya, a Philippine fishermen\u2019s organization.<\/p>\n

\u201cImagine, you\u2019re a Filipino fisherman, you\u2019re in the Philippines, and you\u2019re on municipal fishing grounds, but you\u2019re sued for illegal entry. How hurtful is that? Isn\u2019t that wrong?\u201d Hicap told BenarNews, an RFA-affiliated online news service<\/span>.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u201cWhat misery. Add to that this [COVID-19] pandemic \u2013 no one\u2019s buying what little catch they bring home because of the lockdowns,\u201d said Hicap, adding that fishermen have little choice but to consume their own catch, or barter them for other small goods.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Municipalities are allowing outsiders to pay an annual fee, usually not lower than 1,000 pesos (U.S. $20) \u2013 a fee that subsistence fishermen, who use small-scale, low-technology practices, cannot afford to pay \u2013 according to Hicap\u2019s group.\u00a0Besides, it\u2019s not feasible to register and pay fees at every coastal municipality to be able to fish in waters that have traditionally been communal to Filipinos.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Restrictions were not an issue in past decades when there were more fish in the shallows, said Benjamin Sumaganday, a fisherman in northern Masinloc town.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u201cThere used to be huge catches in the past. But the population grew over the years, and we can\u2019t afford to just stay in municipal waters,\u201d the father of four told BenarNews.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Meanwhile on June 5, the world will mark the fourth International Day for the Fight against Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing (IUU).<\/p>\n

According to the Food and Agriculture Organization, a United Nations agency, \u201cIUU fishing includes many types of illicit activities, for example, fishing without a license or authorization, not reporting or misreporting catches, fishing in prohibited areas and catching or selling prohibited species, or fishing in areas not covered by a regulatory framework.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n

The Philippines Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR) has vowed to protect locals against such activities.<\/p>\n

Calling on Filipinos to focus their fishing efforts in the West Philippine Sea \u2013 a region of the South China Sea that the Philippines claims as its territory \u2013 the government agency promised to boost patrols against illegal fishing put local fishers at a disadvantage.<\/p>\n

\u201c[W]e remain committed in our mandate to address IUU fishing in Philippine waters,\u201d the bureau said in a news release earlier this year.<\/p>\n

\n\"A<\/a>\n
A man tows his catch of a Spanish mackerel as he swims to shore in Masinloc, Philippines, May 28, 2021. Credit: BenarNews<\/figcaption>\n<\/small>\n
\n\n\n<\/a>\n<\/div>\n<\/figure>\nMunicipal action questioned<\/strong><\/p>\n

Even as municipal governments cite conservation as the reason for restricting fishing access to their waters, Hicap said those in power could be benefiting \u2013 otherwise, they would not let in commercial trawlers.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u201cSmall-time fishermen are not the reason there is depletion in municipal waters. The cause of that depletion is the commercial vessels who freely exploit those waters,\u201d Hicap said.<\/p>\n

Anna Oposa, head of the advocacy group Save Philippine Seas, said enforcement must be stricter and commercial fishing must be prohibited.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u201cOur fisherfolk are already some of the poorest, most marginalized groups in the country working hard to feed the country and the rest of the world. There can be no positive outcome for the Filipino people if we allow commercial fishing activities where they shouldn\u2019t be allowed,\u201d Oposa said.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Sumaganday, 52, said many fishermen in his community have joined fishing fleets to be able to fish farther out at sea even as territorial tensions pit Filipinos against foreign fishing fleets, specifically from China.<\/p>\n

\u201cMost of the time it is not hostile, but there are times that we are being shooed away from territories that are traditionally ours,\u201d the fisherman from Masinloc said.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

Chinese encroachment<\/strong><\/p>\n

In March, government security officials reported the presence of about 200 Chinese trawlers at Whitsun Reef in the Philippine exclusive economic zone (EEZ) and elsewhere in the contested South China Sea. The officials said the trawlers were crewed by maritime militias, but Beijing has denied the accusation and insisted the waters were within Chinese territory.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Manila has been filing daily diplomatic protests with Beijing since April, demanding it remove the ships. In addition, the Philippine navy, coast guard, and fisheries bureau have deployed more ships to Scarborough Shoal and the Spratly Islands to try to drive out or at least challenge the Chinese trawlers.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Since Beijing took control of Mischief Reef in the Philippine EEZ in 1995, the presence of Chinese ships has increased steadily in the South China Sea. In 2012, China and the Philippines were involved in a months-long standoff at Scarborough Shoal.<\/p>\n

Four years later, in 2016, an international arbitral court ruled in favor of Manila\u2019s territorial claims in the maritime region, but that has not slowed Beijing\u2019s expansionist activities in the sea.<\/p>\n

Hicap\u2019s group, Pamalakaya, recently petitioned the U.N. to nullify Beijing\u2019s new coast guard law, investigate the environmental damage Chinese ships have caused in the South China Sea, and \u201cdemilitarize\u201d the strategic and resource-rich waterway.<\/p>\n

The law, which took effect in February, allows its ships to use weapons against any vessels found in waters that Beijing claims as its territory.<\/p>\n

Philippine authorities who lack maritime assets have been hard pressed to catch poachers, including foreign ones from China and Vietnam.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u201cThere\u2019s been significant damage to marine life in municipal waters. The numbers vary in different studies, but it\u2019s been estimated that 60 percent to 75 percent of the Philippines\u2019 fishing grounds are overfished,\u201d Oposa told BenarNews.\u00a0\u201cThere\u2019s also a significant decline in coral reef health and cover, which is alarming because coral reefs are habitats of fishes.\u201d<\/p>\n

An organization of fishermen who used to fish freely at the Scarborough Shoal said their catch \u2013 and income \u2013 had declined by as much as 80 percent.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u201cWe used to be able to go there, but not anymore,\u201d Sumaganday said.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u201cNow are we are forced to fish elsewhere,\u201d he said, adding that the shoal, in bygone days, was the source for a bountiful catch.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\n\"Filipino<\/a>\n
Filipino fishermen board their boat anchored along the Infanta fish port in Pangasinan, north of Manila, May 27, 2021. Credit: BenarNews<\/figcaption>\n<\/small>\n
\n\n\n<\/a>\n<\/div>\n<\/figure>\nFishing industry numbers<\/strong><\/p>\n

Subsistence fishermen make up the largest sector of the Philippines\u2019 fishing industry, according to the most recent data from BFAR.<\/p>\n

Of the 1.9 million fishermen registered with BFAR, more than 927,000 do small-scale \u201ccapture fishing,\u201d while more than 239,000 do \u201cgleaning\u201d or fishing with basic gear in shallow water. Paddle boats accounted for about 68 percent of registered vessels.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Meanwhile, much of government support for the industry goes into aquaculture \u2013 raising fish in ponds, nets or cages in natural or artificial bodies of water \u2013 which employs about 209,000, according to official statistics.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Most fishermen live hand-to-mouth and have few options to professionalize their livelihood including acquiring larger, more dependable boats and equipment. As Chinese and Vietnamese fishermen sport metal or wood-and-metal trawlers, many Filipinos use traditional-type wooden outriggers.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Hicap worries that as the Philippine Congress moves to amend the constitution to allow full foreign ownership of businesses in the country, Filipino fishermen, especially the poor, will sink even farther down the government\u2019s list of priorities.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe government should ensure municipal fishing grounds remain communal. They should be limited to subsistence fishers, with no commercial vessels,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

Reported by BenarNews, an RFA-affiliated online news service.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n \n \n


\r\nThis content originally appeared on
Radio Free Asia<\/a> and was authored by Radio Free Asia.
<\/p>\n

This post was originally published on Radio Free<\/a>. <\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Fishing group Pamalakaya leader blames commercial boats for depletion of stock in territorial waters.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1180,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[27149,27150],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/192979"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1180"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=192979"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/192979\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":192980,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/192979\/revisions\/192980"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=192979"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=192979"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=192979"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}