{"id":201849,"date":"2021-06-13T03:54:26","date_gmt":"2021-06-13T03:54:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dissidentvoice.org\/?p=117677"},"modified":"2021-06-13T03:54:26","modified_gmt":"2021-06-13T03:54:26","slug":"a-few-thoughts-on-white-identity","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/2021\/06\/13\/a-few-thoughts-on-white-identity\/","title":{"rendered":"A Few Thoughts on White Identity"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a>I may well be among the few people here who\u2019ve only recently come across Robin DiAngelo\u2019s immensely popular book, White Fragility: Why White People Have Such a Hard Time Talking About Racism<\/em>, but I\u2019ll share a few of my reactions. In my opinion, this book starkly epitomizes the dangerous consequences when discussions of white identity are divorced from class analysis. After George Floyd\u2019s death at the hands of the Minneapolis police, Di Angelo\u2019s \u201cantiracism\u201d training manual ascended to the top of Amazon\u2019s best seller list. The author is a white, liberal, female sociologist who specializes in wokesplaining about whiteness to other whites. She coined the term \u201cwhite fragility\u201d in 2011 to mean the immense strain \u2014 in her words, they suffer a \u201ca meltdown\u201d \u2014 produced when whites are called out on their racist attitudes and behavior.<\/p>\n

In what has become a highly lucrative cottage industry, DiAngelo facilitates diversity training workshops and in addition to elite university administrations and government agencies, her clients include corporations like Nike, Goldman Sachs, Coca-Cola, CVS, Levi Strauss & Co, W.L. Gore (makers of Goretex) Google, Under Armour, Netflix and American Express. She was even a guest on The Tonight Show<\/em>, where host Jimmy Fallon was reverential and gushing in his praise. DiAngelo has reportedly made over $2 million off her book and 60-90 minute talks reap up to $30,000, a two-hour workshop $35,000 and half day events, $40,00. Tickets to her public presentations range up to $160 and you can engage in telephone correspondence with DiAngelo for $320 per hour. In 2020, her three homes were reportedly valued at $1.6 million.<\/p>\n

Just 10 days after Floyd\u2019 death, Nancy Pelosi introduced DiAngelo\u2019s Zoom address to 184 Democratic members of Congress in what was designated a \u201cDemocratic Caucus family discussion on race.\u201d For Democratic Party leaders and corporate PR departments, consultants of DiAngelo\u2019s ilk are a wet dream of how to address racism because, as Bhasker Sundara rightly asserts, \u201cThe more that blame can be shifted to individual \u2018Karens,\u2019 the less onus is on powerful corporations, and the politicians who defend them to make real change in our system of racialized capitalism.\u201d<\/p>\n

I\u2019m reminded of Rhyd Wildemuth\u2019s observation that \u201cWhite people who identify more with their whiteness over their material conditions, protect the capitalists (most of whom have the same color of skin as them). Identifying instead with their material conditions and their history of displacement would show them they have more in common with poor black people than they ever will with the rich.\u201d1<\/a><\/sup>\u00a0Of course, the \u2018white race\u201d isn\u2019t real; it doesn\u2019t actually exist. We know that prior to the Enlightenment, people saw themselves as members of a clan, tribe, religion or geographic region. Europeans didn\u2019t think of themselves as \u201cwhite people\u201d until it emerged from the confluence of settler colonialism and the artificial contraction of \u201cwhiteness.\u201d In The Price of Admission<\/em>, in 1985, James Baldwin wrote: \u201cWhite people are not white: Part of the price of the ticket is deluding themselves into believing they are.\u201d\u00a0And Dr. Gerald Horne adroitly depicts this transformation as follows:<\/p>\n

All of sudden when crossing the Atlantic, in a narrow manner that would make Madison Blush, all are rebranded as \u2018white\u2019 which subsumes many of the tensions, ethnic and class among them, in a new monetized and militarized \u2018identity politics\u2019 of whiteness based on expropriation of the indigenous and enslavement of the Africans.\u00a02<\/a><\/sup><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

This is not to suggest that the social construct of whiteness, its sociology, does not continue to have a real impact on real lives. Indeed, one would be hard pressed to find a better, consciously conceived and malicious identity than the white race. It\u2019s the sleight of hand deceit that conceals the underlying brutality of our capitalist economic order.<\/p>\n

In perusing DiAngelo\u2019s book, which lacks an index, one searches in vain for the word \u201ccapitalism.\u201d However, in an interview with Daniel Berger, published in the New York Times<\/em> (July 15, 2020), DiAngelo abruptly volunteered that \u201cCapitalism is dependent on inequality, on an underclass.\u201d So why isn\u2019t that included in her diversity training workshops? Because, she replied, \u201cCapitalism is so bound up with racism. I avoid criticizing capitalism \u2014I don\u2019t need to give people a reason to dismiss me.\u201d When asked for any reasons to be optimistic, DiAngelo mentioned NASCAR\u2019S banning of Confederate flags and the renaming of military bases.<\/p>\n

DiAngelo asserts that \u201cracism is the foundation of our society\u201d and because we all grow up in America\u2019s deeply racist culture, all white people \u2014 no exceptions \u2014 are collectively racist, including younger people. Commenting specifically on the latter, she writes: \u201cI\u2019m often asked if I think the younger generation is less racist. No, I don\u2019t.\u201d (P. 50). What to do? According to her, after acknowledging one\u2019s racism, the quintessential question for white people to ask themselves is: \u201cHow have I been shaped by society?\u201d This explanation is deeply suspect because, as Michael Parenti has often reminded us, cultural explanations are all too often closer to tautologies than actual explanations. That is, the culture itself is what needs to be explained. Who created it and what were their motives? Those questions and their system destabilizing answers are off the table for DiAngelo.<\/p>\n

In a widely circulated critique of DiAngelo\u2019s training manual, University of Tennessee history professor, David Barber, succinctly zeroed in on the consequences of avoiding class analysis. I sense it\u2019s a message we should emphasize in conversations with other white folks and it merits this lengthy quotation:<\/p>\n

White supremacy is not only white over black, it is also the small number of rich whites over the much larger number of rich whites over the much larger number of poor and working class whites. In return for a guarantee that the latter group of whites will suffer the many calamities of life afforded working people less intensely and less frequently than do people of color, the poor and the working class will not challenge the rule of the rich. [T]he contradiction of white supremacy for the poor and the working class is not that white supremacy advances us but that it ties us to our own oppression… It\u2019s the bribe to keep the poor and working class passive in the face of their own oppression.\u00a03<\/a><\/sup><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

In response to my query on this topic, Michael Yates, an economist, labor educator, writer and editor at Monthly Review<\/em>, put it this way:<\/p>\n

White workers simply don\u2019t want to fall as low as they think nonwhite workers are, not just economically but socially and politically.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

That is, as bad as things are or might become, whites are not at very bottom of the pecking order where Black people are. Their fear is that their white status will be undermined by any African-American gains. Pitiful as it it, this may be as concise, revelatory and serviceable a definition we can put forward for white skin privilege.<\/p>\n

Finally, by positing the ineluctability of white racism \u2014 the flat out futility of thinking that white attitudes can change \u2014 DiAngelo\u2019s book uncannily dovetails with Afropessimism, an analysis most closely identified with Prof. Frank Wilderson and one that also further fragments and abandons the crucial necessity of solidarity and multi-racial struggle. I may by mistaken but by my reading, the latter neglects and negates Black agency in the present and future and also fosters the belief that white people are incapable of renouncing racism which, in turn, contributes to pervasive feelings of hopelessness. Needless to say, both schools of thought lend welcome camouflage to corporate elites and their willing enablers, in part, because racial capitalism depends on manufacturing this white ignorance.<\/p>\n

  1. Rhyd Wildemuth, Fascism and the Deadlock of Race<\/em>, Gods & Radicals Press, September 5, 2020.<\/li>
  2. Gerald Horne, \u201cAgainst Left-Wing White Nationalism<\/a>,\u201d Black Agenda Report<\/em>, May 26, 2021.<\/li>
  3. David Barber, \u201cRenouncing White Privilege: A Left Critique of Robin DiAngelo\u2019s \u2018White Fragility,\u2019\u201d Counterpunch<\/em>, August 3, 2020.<\/li><\/ol>The post A Few Thoughts on White Identity<\/a> first appeared on Dissident Voice<\/a>.\n

    This post was originally published on Dissident Voice<\/a>. <\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    I may well be among the few people here who\u2019ve only recently come across Robin DiAngelo\u2019s immensely popular book, White Fragility: Why White People Have Such a Hard Time Talking About Racism, but I\u2019ll share a few of my reactions. In my opinion, this book starkly epitomizes the dangerous consequences when discussions of white identity [\u2026]<\/p>\n

    The post A Few Thoughts on White Identity<\/a> first appeared on Dissident Voice<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":318,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[410,30,469,29286,29287,29288,784,29289],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/201849"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/318"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=201849"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/201849\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":201853,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/201849\/revisions\/201853"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=201849"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=201849"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=201849"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}