{"id":221165,"date":"2021-06-29T17:31:21","date_gmt":"2021-06-29T17:31:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/radiofree.asia\/?guid=49ba4bdfcf5aa43c308b08a602bc2426"},"modified":"2021-06-29T17:31:21","modified_gmt":"2021-06-29T17:31:21","slug":"bidens-latest-middle-east-airstrikes-give-more-fuel-to-conflict-with-iran","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/2021\/06\/29\/bidens-latest-middle-east-airstrikes-give-more-fuel-to-conflict-with-iran\/","title":{"rendered":"Biden\u2019s Latest Middle East Airstrikes Give \u201cMore Fuel\u201d to Conflict With Iran"},"content":{"rendered":"<a href=\"https:\/\/truthout.org\/video\/bidens-latest-middle-east-airstrikes-give-more-fuel-to-conflict-with-iran\/\"><img width=\"200\" height=\"113\" src=\"https:\/\/truthout.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/SEG2-Iraq-Airstrike-2-200x113.jpg\" class=\"attachment-thumbnail size-thumbnail wp-post-image\" alt=\"Biden\u2019s Latest Middle East Airstrikes Give \u201cMore Fuel\u201d to Conflict with Iran\" loading=\"lazy\" srcset=\"https:\/\/truthout.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/SEG2-Iraq-Airstrike-2-200x113.jpg 200w, https:\/\/truthout.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/SEG2-Iraq-Airstrike-2-400x225.jpg 400w, https:\/\/truthout.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/SEG2-Iraq-Airstrike-2-1200x675.jpg 1200w, https:\/\/truthout.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/SEG2-Iraq-Airstrike-2-800x450.jpg 800w, https:\/\/truthout.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/SEG2-Iraq-Airstrike-2-1536x864.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/truthout.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/SEG2-Iraq-Airstrike-2.jpg 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 200px) 100vw, 200px\" \/><\/a><aside class=\"introtext\">Image Credit: U.S. Military Handout<\/aside>\n<p>Criticism is growing of recent U.S. airstrikes in Iraq and Syria, which the Biden administration says targeted Iran-backed militias. Iraqi Prime Minister Mustafa al-Kadhimi condemned the attack as a \u201cblatant and unacceptable violation of Iraqi sovereignty and Iraqi national security.\u201d The U.S. airstrikes come as the Biden administration is holding indirect talks with Iran about reviving the Iranian nuclear deal. Jamal Abdi, president of the National Iranian American Council, says the U.S. needs to end its \u201cconstant tit for tat\u201d with Iran across the Middle East. \u201cBy failing to pivot away from that and instead bombing targets inside of Iraq, we are giving more fuel to this conflict,\u201d he says.<\/p>\n<h2>TRANSCRIPT<\/h2>\n<p><em>This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.<\/em><\/p>\n<div class=\"text\">\n<p><strong><span class=\"caps\">AMY<\/span> <span class=\"caps\">GOODMAN<\/span>:<\/strong> This is <em>Democracy Now!<\/em>, democracynow.org, <em>The War and Peace Report<\/em>. I\u2019m Amy Goodman, with Juan Gonzalez.<\/p>\n<p>A U.S. military base near a major oil field in eastern Syria came under attack Monday, one day after the Biden administration launched airstrikes in Syria and Iraq targeting an Iranian-backed militia. Shortly before 8 p.m. local time, multiple rockets hit the U.S. base near the U.S.-controlled Al-Omar oil field. The U.S. responded directing artillery fire at nearby rocket launching positions.<\/p>\n<p>This comes as criticism of the U.S. airstrikes grow. Iraq\u2019s prime minister condemned the U.S. attack as a, quote, \u201cblatant and unacceptable violation of Iraqi sovereignty and Iraqi national security,\u201d unquote. A symbolic funeral was held today in Baghdad for four members of the Iraq Popular Mobilization Forces killed in the U.S. strikes. Syrian media is [reporting] Iran\u2019s Foreign Ministry accused the United States of, quote, \u201cdisrupting security in the region.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>On Monday, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken defended the U.S. military strikes, claiming they were done in self-defense.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><strong><span class=\"caps\">SECRETARY<\/span> OF <span class=\"caps\">STATE<\/span> <span class=\"caps\">ANTONY<\/span> <span class=\"caps\">BLINKEN<\/span>:<\/strong> We took necessary, appropriate, deliberate action that is designed to limit the risk of escalation, but also to send a clear and unambiguous deterrent message. This action, in self-defense, to do what\u2019s necessary to prevent further attacks, I think, sends a very important and strong message. And I hope very much that it is received by those who were intended to receive it.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><strong><span class=\"caps\">AMY<\/span> <span class=\"caps\">GOODMAN<\/span>:<\/strong> The U.S. military airstrikes come at a time when the Biden administration is holding indirect talks with Iran about reviving the Iranian nuclear deal.<\/p>\n<p>We\u2019re joining right now by Jamal Abdi, the president of the National Iranian American Council.<\/p>\n<p>Welcome to <em>Democracy Now!<\/em> Can you respond to these attacks?<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class=\"caps\">JAMAL<\/span> <span class=\"caps\">ABDI<\/span>:<\/strong> Well, you know, it\u2019s hard to find something novel to say about the United States bombing Iraq at this point in time. We\u2019ve been doing this for 30 years. But this comes at a time when the Biden administration has potentially the opportunity to pivot off of this track that was laid for them by the Trump administration, where they are engaged in this constant tit for tat and attempting to roll back Iranian influence and striking Iranian forces. And as we see, by failing to pivot away from that and instead bombing targets inside of Iraq, we are giving more fuel to this conflict. And instead of disincentivizing further attacks by Iran-linked groups, we see immediately retaliation. And this is how these things continue to bog the United States down in the region. And unless Biden is able to break out of this cycle, this is the norm that we\u2019re going to be continuing.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class=\"caps\">JUAN<\/span> GONZ\u00c1LEZ:<\/strong> And, Jamal, what is the Iraq Popular Mobilization Forces, and what is their connection, if any, to Iran? And also, what\u2019s the status of U.S. troops in Iraq these days? How many are there?<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class=\"caps\">JAMAL<\/span> <span class=\"caps\">ABDI<\/span>:<\/strong> Yeah. So, the groups that Biden struck are part of the Popular Mobilization Units, which were formed to combat <span class=\"caps\">ISIS<\/span> and have been integrated in the Iraqi Security Forces. And so, this is very much, from the Iraqi perspective, a violation of their sovereignty. This is an attack on, you know, groups that are part of the Security Forces.<\/p>\n<p>The United States is still in Iraq. The Iraqis actually \u2014 the parliament voted to kick the United States out back when Donald Trump was doing these strikes and when Donald Trump actually killed the Iranian general, Soleimani, and the leader of one of the groups that Biden then struck yesterday. After those strikes in 2020, the Iraqis voted to kick the United States out. The U.S. is still there. I think there are about 3,000 troops in an advise-and-assist role to support the Iraqi government. But, as we see, you know, this is not having a stabilizing effect, and actually the United States is a target for these groups that, prior to the Donald Trump administration, were actually working, if not in coordination with the United States, then in close proximity with the United States, and we weren\u2019t having these conflicts.<\/p>\n<p>And I don\u2019t think it\u2019s any coincidence that that was when the United States and Iran had a deal. We were at the diplomatic table, we had a nuclear agreement, and we actually started to see this trend reverse. Now we\u2019re back in a state where we don\u2019t have a nuclear agreement. We\u2019re trying to get back to there. The U.S. is in Iraq but in a different role. And Biden supposedly wants to withdraw from the region or draw down from the region. And the failure of diplomacy, combined with the willingness to engage in these strikes to supposedly create a deterrent, but actually put a big target on our backs, is a very bad place to be. And it\u2019s hard to see a way out of it, unless there is a diplomatic breakthrough.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class=\"caps\">AMY<\/span> <span class=\"caps\">GOODMAN<\/span>:<\/strong> Jamal, this is like a rite of passage, and Biden already did this once, so this is the second time since he\u2019s come to office. But he is the sixth U.S. president in a row to bomb Iraq. I mean, you have George H.W. Bush, you have President Clinton, President George W. Bush, you have President Obama, you have President Trump, and then you have Biden. Now, let me play how the White House spokesperson Jen Psaki defended the airstrikes.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><strong><span class=\"caps\">PRESS<\/span> <span class=\"caps\">SECRETARY<\/span> <span class=\"caps\">JEN<\/span> <span class=\"caps\">PSAKI<\/span>:<\/strong> The targeted strikes were directed at facilities used by Iran-backed militias involved in these ongoing attacks for purposes including weapons storage, command logistics and unmanned aerial vehicle operations. So, Article II, the self-defense, the defense of the United States and our interests, is our domestic justification for the strikes announced yesterday. \u2026 The president\u2019s view is that it was necessary, appropriate and deliberate action, these strikes, designed to limit the risk of escalation.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><strong><span class=\"caps\">AMY<\/span> <span class=\"caps\">GOODMAN<\/span>:<\/strong> So, they\u2019re saying \u2014 the U.S. is saying it was self-defense. But it\u2019s also interesting that the airstrikes come two weeks after the House of Representatives voted to repeal the <span class=\"caps\">AUMF<\/span>, the 2002 Authorization for Use of Military Force, which grants sweeping war powers to the president. What will this mean for the nuclear deal that supposedly is \u2014 President Biden is attempting to revive?<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class=\"caps\">JAMAL<\/span> <span class=\"caps\">ABDI<\/span>:<\/strong> As you know, the talks to revive the nuclear deal are ongoing. We\u2019re now in this awkward position where we have a lame-duck administration in Iran, who \u2014 the Rouhani government, who placed all of its political hopes and capital in the prospect of d\u00e9tente with the West and with the United States and getting this nuclear deal, to then have the rug pulled out from under it by Donald Trump, and now we are where we are today, where Iran is expanding its nuclear program and Iranians are suffering under sanctions, <span class=\"caps\">COVID<\/span>, government mismanagement, and it\u2019s a terrible situation.<\/p>\n<p>The talks are ongoing, and I think that the talks may still yield a return to the deal. I don\u2019t think that\u2019s necessarily off the table. But I think these actions make it a lot more difficult and have a risk of poisoning the atmosphere there. That being said, you know, I do think that the Iranian supreme leader has signaled that he does want to get this deal, and the incoming president, the hard-line Ebrahim Raisi, has also, if not signaled his support for the deal, signaled that he will accept it.<\/p>\n<p>And I think what really is going to determine whether that happens, it may be these negotiations with this outgoing sort of, quote-unquote, \u201cfriendly\u201d administration in Iran, but it also may come under this new government. And the question then is: What does that then build towards? Is there further diplomacy that can happen? It does not look like that\u2019s going to be the case.<\/p>\n<p>I think, for Congress, you know, you hear a lot of voices from Congress criticizing these talks and saying, you know, either we need to not be talking to Iran or we need to seek this bigger and better deal that Donald Trump was trying to get. So, there\u2019s no bigger, better deal on the table unless we return to these obligations. And I just think the fact that the Biden administration is using this legally dubious grounds for these strikes and keeping Congress out of that conversation \u2014 Congress is supposed to be authorizing the wars. They\u2019re not involved, so they\u2019re totally detached from the consequences of the failure of diplomacy. And so it\u2019s very easy to cheerlead these strikes and to criticize diplomacy, for members of Congress who don\u2019t actually have any skin in the game when it comes to having to authorize these strikes that are very unpopular among the American public.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class=\"caps\">JUAN<\/span> GONZ\u00c1LEZ:<\/strong> I wanted to ask you also \u2014 this whole issue of self-defense. Given that the United \u2014 isn\u2019t this the essence of how an imperial power operates? If you station enough troops around the world \u2014 and, of course, the United States has troops in scores of countries around the world \u2014 you could always claim self-defense of the United States, because you\u2019re so extended in so many different parts that have really no direct relation to our own country.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class=\"caps\">JAMAL<\/span> <span class=\"caps\">ABDI<\/span>:<\/strong> Yeah, absolutely. And the U.S. presence in Iraq \u2014 I mean, going back to 1991, the U.S. presence in Iraq and the region have only put targets on the United States\u2019s back and given rationalization to groups that want to see, you know, legitimately or illegitimately \u2014 you know, I let you decide \u2014 but want to see the United States out of the region. And that\u2019s exactly what we\u2019re doing. You know, counter to popular belief, Iran is not going to leave the region. They\u2019re stuck there. They\u2019re geographically stuck there. The United States isn\u2019t. And the notion that we\u2019re going to perpetually be, whether it\u2019s having a large-scale troop presence there or even this more limited presence but continuing to engage in these deterrent strikes and this tit for tat, is going to lead to any new results just belies the past 30 years of history with the United States in the region.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span class=\"caps\">AMY<\/span> <span class=\"caps\">GOODMAN<\/span>:<\/strong> Jamal Abdi, we want to thank you for being with us, and, of course, we\u2019re going to continue to cover this, president of the National Iranian American Council.<\/p>\n<p>This is <em>Democracy Now!<\/em> Next up, Vice President Harris did go to the border Friday, went to El Paso, Texas, but didn\u2019t go to this massive emergency shelter for migrant children at Fort Bliss military base. The Border Network for Human Rights held a protest there with other groups yesterday demanding that the site for the children be shut down. Stay with us.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n<p class=\"syndicated-attribution\">This post was originally published on <a href=\"https:\/\/truthout.org\/video\/bidens-latest-middle-east-airstrikes-give-more-fuel-to-conflict-with-iran\/\">Latest \u2013 Truthout<\/a>. <\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/truthout.org\/video\/bidens-latest-middle-east-airstrikes-give-more-fuel-to-conflict-with-iran\/\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"200\" height=\"113\" src=\"https:\/\/truthout.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/SEG2-Iraq-Airstrike-2-200x113.jpg\" class=\"attachment-thumbnail size-thumbnail wp-post-image\" alt=\"Biden\u2019s Latest Middle East Airstrikes Give \u201cMore Fuel\u201d to Conflict with Iran\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/a><\/p>\n<div class=\"entry-summary\">The airstrikes come as the Biden administration holds indirect talks with Iran about reviving the Iranian nuclear deal.<\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":1462,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10803,1328,463,25,192,273,28601,196],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/221165"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1462"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=221165"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/221165\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":221166,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/221165\/revisions\/221166"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=221165"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=221165"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=221165"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}