{"id":28164,"date":"2021-02-05T22:51:22","date_gmt":"2021-02-05T22:51:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/realprogressives.org\/?p=39198"},"modified":"2021-02-05T22:51:22","modified_gmt":"2021-02-05T22:51:22","slug":"why-a-minimum-acceptable-compromise-matters","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/2021\/02\/05\/why-a-minimum-acceptable-compromise-matters\/","title":{"rendered":"Why A Minimum Acceptable Compromise Matters"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\u201cDesigned to leave the world’s economic destiny at the mercy of bankers and multinational corporations, Globalization is a logical extension of imperialism, a victory of empire over republic, international finance capital over democracy.\u201d <\/em><\/p>Michael Parenti, Against Empire <\/em><\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n
I want to start by defining a term. I know it is fully possible others have thought of this concept, but\u00a0as of yet, I haven\u2019t seen the concept enter progressive, leftist, or mainstream discourse. The term is ‘minimum acceptable compromise.’ The definition\u00a0I am\u00a0coining is inherently tied to politics and the idea of progress.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Minimum Acceptable Compromise [MAC] (phrase\/noun):<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n
- The minimum acceptable policy solution to ___________ problem or crisis.\u00a0
<\/span><\/span>\u00a0<\/span>
\n\n
- Anything less than the MAC is not worth the energy to fight for; winning a reform or program less effective or progressive than the MAC ultimately diffuses and obfuscates progress towards a better society.<\/span><\/span>\u00a0
<\/span><\/li>\n- The existence of a MAC implies a known or unknown \u201ceven better\u201d solution.<\/span><\/span>\u00a0
<\/span><\/li>\n- Examples:
<\/span><\/span>\u00a0<\/span>\n\n
- Public Option healthcare is below the minimum acceptable compromise of\u00a0<\/span><\/span>Medicare For All<\/span><\/span><\/a>.
<\/span><\/span><\/li>\n- PatriotCare<\/span><\/span>, an American NHS<\/span><\/span><\/a>\u00a0is a known \u201ceven better\u201d solution to the crisis of lack of healthcare in America.<\/span><\/span>\u00a0
<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/li>\n- The minimum acceptable position,\u00a0<\/span><\/span>as\u00a0<\/span><\/span>adopted in rhetoric and advocacy.
<\/span><\/span>\n\n
- Anything less than the MAC is indicative of watering-down and lack of passion<\/span><\/span>\u00a0or backbone<\/span><\/span>\u00a0in fighting for _____________ issue.\u00a0<\/span><\/span>\u00a0
<\/span><\/li>\n- Great litmus test for whether to support a certain politician.\u00a0
<\/span><\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n- Examples:
<\/span><\/span>\u00a0<\/span>\n\n
- Warnock, Biden, &\u00a0<\/span><\/span>Ossoff<\/span><\/span>\u00a0campaigned in GA<\/span><\/span><\/a>, themselves setting a minimum acceptable compromise of new, $2,000 dollar stimulus checks for every American.\u00a0<\/span><\/span>\u00a0
<\/span>\n\n
- The \u201ceven better\u201d position is the\u00a0<\/span><\/span>A<\/span><\/span>utomatic\u00a0<\/span><\/span>B<\/span><\/span>OOST to\u00a0<\/span><\/span>C<\/span><\/span>ommunities<\/span><\/span>\u00a0act,<\/span><\/span><\/a>\u00a0which would provide\u00a0<\/span><\/span>$<\/span><\/span>2,000\u00a0<\/span><\/span>per person one-time followed by\u00a0<\/span><\/span>$<\/span><\/span>1,000 monthly<\/span><\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/span>(most likely\u00a0<\/span><\/span>retroactive to\u00a0<\/span><\/span>M<\/span><\/span>arch 2020<\/span><\/span>)<\/span><\/span>.<\/span><\/span>\u00a0
<\/span><\/li>\n- The \u201ceven better\u201d than #1 position is $2,000 checks monthly, retroactive to March 2020. Legislation\u00a0<\/span><\/span>known as the Monthly Economic Crisis Support Act was introduced<\/span><\/span><\/a>\u00a0by now-VP – then Senator Harris, as well as Senator Sanders and Senator Markey to do that during the election season.<\/span><\/span>\u00a0
<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/li>\n- #DefundThePolice
<\/span><\/span>\u00a0<\/span>\n\n
- A position indicating significant reduction in municipal budgets for police forces and distribution of those programs to social safety nets.
\u00a0<\/span><\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n- Was originally intended as a step to the \u201ceven better\u201d\u00a0<\/span>position<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/span>of #AbolishThePolice.<\/span><\/span><\/a>
\u00a0<\/span><\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n- Has been watered down by liberals to mean basically nothing.
\u00a0<\/span><\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/li>\n- Anything less than the MAC isn\u2019t worth the time and energy to support; further compromise is detrimental to progress and causes more harm in the long run.<\/span><\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n
The MAC\u00a0is an essential litmus test. Voting and advocating for vague ‘lesser evil’ or ‘harm reduction’ has directly dragged America right since at least Reagan. In 2021, the effects of ‘harm reduction’ voting are already being felt by the Biden\/Harris administration.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Biden has used executive power to, among other things, issue 31 new oil\u00a0permits\u00a0and\u00a0expand the kids in cages (now called the shiny term\u00a0‘unaccompanied migrant children in overflow facilities’) –\u00a0including at a facility Trump closed<\/a>,\u00a0and we\u2019re barely two weeks in.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n