{"id":301029,"date":"2021-09-07T02:04:28","date_gmt":"2021-09-07T02:04:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dissidentvoice.org\/?p=120771"},"modified":"2021-09-07T02:04:28","modified_gmt":"2021-09-07T02:04:28","slug":"the-longest-war-is-not-over","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/2021\/09\/07\/the-longest-war-is-not-over\/","title":{"rendered":"The \u201cLongest War\u201d Is Not Over"},"content":{"rendered":"

Speaking from the White House on August 31, President Joe Biden lied<\/a> to the people of the U.S. and to the world: \u201cLast night in Kabul, the United States ended 20 years of war in Afghanistan \u2014 the longest war in American history.\u201d The U.S. war on Afghanistan did not end\u2014 it has only adapted to technological advances and morphed into a war that will be more politically sustainable, one more intractable and more easily exportable. As the president admitted, \u201cWe will maintain the fight against terrorism in Afghanistan and other countries.\u00a0 We just don\u2019t need to fight a ground war to do it.\u00a0 We have what\u2019s called over-the-horizon capabilities, which means we can strike terrorists and targets without American boots on the ground \u2014 or very few, if needed.\u201d<\/p>\n

Five days before, on the evening of Thursday, August 26, hours after a suicide bomb was detonated at the gate of Kabul\u2019s Hamid Karzai International Airport killing and wounding scores of Afghans trying to flee their country and killing 18 U.S. soldiers, President Biden\u00a0spoke<\/a>\u00a0to the world, \u201coutraged as well as heartbroken,\u201d he said. Many of us listening to the president\u2019s speech, made before the victims could be counted and the rubble cleared, did not find comfort or hope in his words. Instead, our heartbreak and outrage were only amplified as Joe Biden seized the tragedy to call for more war.<\/p>\n

\u201cTo those who carried out this attack, as well as anyone who wishes America harm, know this: We will not forgive. We will not forget. We will hunt you down and make you pay,\u201d he threatened. \u201cI\u2019ve also ordered my commanders to develop operational plans to strike ISIS-K assets, leadership and facilities. We will respond with force and precision at our time, at the place we choose and the moment of our choosing.\u201d<\/p>\n

The president\u2019s threatened \u201cmoment of our choosing\u201d came one day later, on Friday, August 27, when the U.S. military carried out a drone strike against what it said was an ISIS-K \u201cplanner\u201d in Afghanistan’s eastern Nangarhar province. The U.S. military\u2019s claim that it knows of \u201cno civilian casualties\u201d in the attack is contradicted by reports<\/a> from the ground. \u201cWe saw that rickshaws were burning,\u201d one Afghan witness said. \u201cChildren and women were wounded and one man, one boy and one woman had been killed on the spot.\u201d Fear of an ISIS-K counterattack further hampered evacuation efforts as the U.S. Embassy warned<\/a> U.S. citizens to leave the airport. \u201cThis strike was not the last,\u201d said<\/a> President Biden. On August 29, another U.S. drone strike killed a family of ten<\/a> in Kabul.<\/p>\n

The first lethal drone strike<\/a> in history occurred in Afghanistan on October 7, 2001, when the CIA identified Taliban leader Mullah Omar, \u201cor 98-percent probable it was he,\u201d but the Hellfire missile launched by a Predator drone killed two unidentified men while Mullah Omar escaped. These two recent instances of \u201cforce and precision\u201d ordered by Biden twenty years later, marked the presumed end to the war there just as it had begun. The intervening record has not been much better and, in fact, documents exposed by whistleblower Daniel Hale<\/a> prove that the U.S. government is aware that 90% of its drone strike victims are not the intended targets.<\/p>\n

Zemari Ahmadi, who was killed in the August 29<\/a> drone strike in Kabul along with nine members of his family, seven of them young children, had been employed by a California based humanitarian organization and had applied for a visa to come to the U.S., as had Ahmadi\u2019s nephew Nasser, also killed in the same attack. Nasser had worked with U.S. Special Forces in the Afghan city of Herat and had also served as a guard for the U.S. Consulate there. Whatever affinity the surviving members of Ahmadi\u2019s family and friends might have had with the U.S. went up in smoke, that day. \u201cAmerica is the killer of Muslims in every place and every time,\u201d said one relative who attended the funeral, \u201cI hope that all Islamic countries unite in their view that America is a criminal.\u201d Another mourner, a colleague of Ahmadi, said \u201cWe\u2019re now much more afraid of drones than we are of the Taliban.\u201d<\/p>\n

The fact that targeted killings like those carried out in Afghanistan and other places from 2001 to the present are counterproductive to the stated objectives of defeating terrorism, regional stability or of winning hearts and minds has been known by the architects of the \u201cwar on terror,\u201d at least since 2009. Thanks to Wikileaks, we have access to a CIA document<\/a> from that year, Making High-Value Targeting Operations an Effective Counterinsurgency Tool<\/em>. Among the \u201ckey findings\u201d in the CIA report, analysts warn of the negative consequences of assassinating so-called High Level Targets (HLT). \u201cThe potential negative effect of HLT operations, include increasing the level of insurgent support \u2026, strengthening an armed group’s bonds with the population, radicalizing an insurgent group’s remaining leaders, creating a vacuum into which more radical groups can enter, and escalating or de-escalating a conflict in ways that favor the insurgents.\u201d<\/p>\n

The obvious truths that the CIA kept buried in a secret report have been admitted many times by high ranking officers implementing those policies. In 2013, General James E. Cartwright, the former vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff\u00a0told the Chicago Council on Global Affairs, reported in The New York Times<\/em>, \u201cWe\u2019re seeing that blowback. If you\u2019re trying to kill your way to a solution, no matter how precise you are, you\u2019re going to upset people even if they\u2019re not targeted.\u201d In a 2010 interview<\/a> in Rollingstone<\/em>, General Stanley McChrystal, then commander of U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan, figured that \u201cfor every innocent person you kill, you create 10 new enemies.\u201d By the general\u2019s equation, the U.S. created a minimum of 130 new enemies for itself in the strikes ordered by President Biden on August 27 and 29 alone.<\/p>\n

When the catastrophic consequences of a nation\u2019s policies are so clearly predictable and evidently inevitable, they are intentional. What has happened to Afghanistan is not a series of mistakes or good intentions gone awry, they are crimes.<\/p>\n

In his novel, 1984<\/em>, George Orwell foresaw a dystopian future where wars would be fought perpetually, not intended to be won or resolved in any way and President Eisenhower\u2019s parting words<\/a> as he left office in 1961 were a warning of the \u201cgrave implications\u201d of the \u201cmilitary-industrial complex.\u201d Wikileaks founder Julian Assange noted that these dire predictions had come to pass, speaking<\/a> in 2011: \u201cThe goal is to use Afghanistan to wash money out of the tax bases of the U.S. and Europe through Afghanistan and back into the hands of a transnational security elite. The goal is an endless war, not a successful war.\u201d<\/p>\n

No, the war is not over. From a nation that should be promising reparations and begging the forgiveness of the people of Afghanistan comes the infantile raging, \u201cWe will not forgive. We will not forget. We will hunt you down and make you pay\u201d and while pledging to perpetuate the conditions that provoke terrorism, the parting taunt \u201cand to ISIS-K: We are not done with you yet.\u201d<\/p>\n

In the simplistic dualism of U.S. partisan politics, the issue seems to be only whether the current president should be blamed or should be given a pass and the blame put on his predecessor. This is a discussion that is not only irrelevant but a dangerous evasion of responsibility. 20 years of war crimes makes many complicit.<\/p>\n

In 1972, Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel wrote: \u201cMorally speaking, there is no limit to the concern one must feel for the suffering of human beings. Indifference to evil is worse than evil itself, [and] in a free society, some are guilty, but all are responsible.\u201d All of us in the U.S., the politicians, voters, tax payers, the investors and even those who protested and resisted it, are responsible for 20 years of war in Afghanistan. We are also all responsible for ending it.<\/p>\n