{"id":500152,"date":"2022-02-05T17:04:07","date_gmt":"2022-02-05T17:04:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dissidentvoice.org\/?p=126255"},"modified":"2022-02-05T17:04:07","modified_gmt":"2022-02-05T17:04:07","slug":"cringeworthy-media-down-under","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/2022\/02\/05\/cringeworthy-media-down-under\/","title":{"rendered":"Cringeworthy Media Down Under"},"content":{"rendered":"

The Russians are coming! So says the Australian mainstream media. <\/p>\n

To be honest, I don\u2019t know what the Murdoch press is saying as my equilibrium depends on my not reading it. The other major media chain, Nine Entertainment, is in full neo-Cold War mode. <\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>Nine Entertainment, as its name implies, has been best known for televising sport. In 2018 it took over Fairfax Media. A family media dynasty was established when John Fairfax<\/a> bought the Sydney Herald<\/i> in 1841. When Nine bought Fairfax it acquired the sole \u2018serious\u2019 papers of Australia\u2019s largest cities, the Sydney Morning Herald<\/i> (SMH<\/i>) and the Melbourne Age<\/i>, the national Australian Financial Review<\/i> and the national capital\u2019s Canberra Times<\/i>. This was some haul with respect to the potential to influence public and policy-making opinion.<\/p>\n

Fairfax\u2019 finest hour was when it published the hard-hitting weekly National Times<\/i>, from 1971 to 1986, that period mostly under the benign chairmanship of patrician James Fairfax. Chaos then ensued, then corporatisation. The loss of classified advertising revenue and the slow take-up of digital media by the then CEO with no media nous led to long term cost-cutting and significant retrenchment of seasoned journalists. The distinct character of the Age<\/i> was abolished. A proud but reduced staff saw the cynical selloff in 2018 by the then CEO and complicit Board.<\/p>\n

The Fairfax\/Nine masthead is \u2018Independent. Always.\u2019. A loyal old-timer claims that this latter-day label was devised as a marketing ploy. These days it\u2019s a joke, yet with no embarrassment shown by editorial and management.<\/p>\n

Fairfax\/Nine still has good and committed journalists. But its World coverage? A shocker. Straight down the line Atlanticist bilge. Fairfax\/Nine retains correspondents in Washington DC and London and they faithfully toe \u2018the correct line\u2019. <\/p>\n

The DC correspondent, Matthew Knott, lived through the Trump Presidency, implicitly decried it, but didn\u2019t look behind it or see the continuities. Once Trump goes, we\u2019ll be back to truth and beauty. Knott readily bought into<\/a> the Russiagate myth. Knott reminisces<\/a> in December 2021 upon returning to Australia. Nice guy but \u2026 Remarkably, comments on the latter article indicate that some readers valued his reportage.<\/p>\n

These correspondents seem universally jejune, read nothing out of the square, seemingly no history whatsoever. In the tough days of the (first) Cold War, establishment-linked journalists (aka the Australian Denis Warner) knew what role they played, whereas their successors are babes in the woods.<\/p>\n

The recent London-based journalists (Nick Miller, Bevan Shields, Latika Bourke) have been perennially abject. Thus we have them toeing the line on Putin\u2019s \u2018bullying\u2019 (5.9.14<\/a>), Russian interference in the West\u2019s appropriate dismantling of Syria (16.4.18<\/a>), Russiagate (17.7.18<\/a>), the Browder\/Magnitsky steam train (23.3.18<\/a>, 1.12.18<\/a>), the downing of MH17 (20.10.14<\/a>, 3.6.15<\/a>, 24.5.18<\/a>, 8.3.20<\/a>, 10.3.20<\/a>, 11.3.20<\/a>, 1.9.20<\/a>, 10.9.21<\/a>), the Skripal novichok \u2018poisonings\u2019 (8.3.18<\/a>, 16.4.18<\/a>, 10.10.18<\/a>, 3.9.20<\/a>, 5.2.21<\/a>), the Navalny circus (3.9.20<\/a>, 28.1.21<\/a>, 5.2.21<\/a>), and Russia\u2019s \u2018imminent invasion\u2019 of Ukraine (29.1.22<\/a>). <\/p>\n

Their reporting of British politics itself has been lamentable (Corbyn was a bogey). They misrepresent key details on the Julian Assange affair (20.11.19<\/a>, 23.9.20<\/a>), have ignored the long background, not least Sweden\u2019s political complicity and Britain\u2019s profound judicial complicity, and have generally remained indifferent to his torture and to the monumental significance of the Assange trial to journalistic integrity.<\/p>\n

However, Fairfax\/Nine\u2019s DC and London correspondents are padding for the main game. The main dish for its readers is the reprinting of articles from American and English mainstream media \u2013 the New York Times<\/i>, the Washington Post<\/i>, The UK Telegraph<\/i>, Reuters, Bloomberg, AP, etc., etc. Unadulterated propaganda. Independent Always indeed.<\/p>\n

I speculate on the mentality of the relevant editors behind this slavish reproduction of slop. Are they under instruction from senior editorial and management? Do they actually believe this stuff they reproduce? Do they think that these sources are models of probity? Were they born yesterday? Is it easier and cheaper than doing one\u2019s own research? <\/p>\n

A peak of the steady drip was on 27 January 2022 when no less than four articles appeared on the problem that Russia and its evil leader Putin poses for \u2018freedom-loving\u2019 peoples. <\/p>\n

Thus we get Ambrose Evans-Pritchard<\/a>, UK Telegraph<\/i>, on German appeasement of Russia. Andrew Kramer<\/a> (no SMH<\/i> link), New York Times<\/i>, on just what dastardly means Russia will deploy in its imminent invasion. Jeff Mason and Humeyra Pamuk<\/a>, Reuters, on the further brutal sanctions envisioned by the ringmaster Biden if Russia pulls any naughty business. And Jeremy Warner<\/a>, UK Telegraph<\/i>, on how Putin\u2019s destabilisation of Ukraine could lead to global chaos in the markets! <\/p>\n

I made an online comment to the latter article noting that if \u2018the markets\u2019 were so responsive to fake news then why pay any attention to them? The comment didn\u2019t appear, exposing how sensitive they are to reflections on their own stupidity. Can\u2019t they take a joke?<\/p>\n

The highlight of Fairfax\/Nine\u2019s sterling contribution to the infowar was an Editorial<\/a> of 20 January. Some highlights:<\/p>\n