{"id":502742,"date":"2022-02-08T02:00:27","date_gmt":"2022-02-08T02:00:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dissidentvoice.org\/?p=126312"},"modified":"2022-02-08T02:00:27","modified_gmt":"2022-02-08T02:00:27","slug":"great-barrier-reef-fantasies-the-morrison-governments-electoral-ploy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/2022\/02\/08\/great-barrier-reef-fantasies-the-morrison-governments-electoral-ploy\/","title":{"rendered":"Great Barrier Reef Fantasies: The Morrison Government\u2019s Electoral Ploy"},"content":{"rendered":"

There are some things that strain credulity.\u00a0 There are the dubious accounts of virgin births.\u00a0 There are the resolute flat earth theorists and denialists of the moon landing.\u00a0 To this can be added the environmental stance of Australia\u2019s Scott Morrison and his ministers, one resolutely opposed to the empirical world.\u00a0 We are now at the phoney stage of an electoral war, and, with the government in more than a spot of bother, you can start expecting some rather extravagant promises of public spending.<\/p>\n

The Great Barrier Reef, one of the single most remarkable natural structures on Planet Earth, home to<\/a> 400 types of coral, 1,500 species of fish and 4,000 types of mollusc, is not one that has been spared.\u00a0 Politically, the Environment Minister Sussan Ley has denied that its health is failing, citing Australia\u2019s superior reef management skills.\u00a0 The Prime Minister, late last month, promised<\/a> that his government would \u201cinvest an additional $1 billion in protecting the Great Barrier Reef, while supporting 64,000 Queenslanders and their jobs which drive the Reef economy.\u201d<\/p>\n

The coupling of both the expenditure and the \u201cReef economy\u201d illustrates the narrow, ballot-driven focus here.\u00a0 Environmental considerations are subsidiary matters; what does matter is the electoral thrust and spin: the jobs, the Queenslanders in industry, votes.<\/p>\n

Morrison does little<\/a> to disabuse us of this.\u00a0 \u201cWe are backing the health of the reef and the economic future of tourism operators, hospitality providers and Queensland communities that are at the heart of the reef economy.\u201d\u00a0 So the Reef better get its act together quickly to enable such communities to flourish.\u00a0 After all, we are told that it is the \u201cbest managed reef in the world\u201d.<\/p>\n

In substance, the new funding package stretching over nine years will cover water quality issues (remediate erosion, reduce nutrient and pesticide runoff); aid reef management and conservation; fund further research into the use of reef resilience; and modest funding for community and Traditional Owner projects.<\/p>\n

The government is also mindful, at least in a fashion, of wanting to remain in UNESCO\u2019s good books.\u00a0 Last year, moves were afoot to place the Reef on the list of world heritage sites \u201cin danger\u201d.\u00a0 UNESCO had recommended doing so in June 2021, claiming that targets for the improvement of water had not been met.\u00a0 \u201cThe recommendation from UNESCO,\u201d Richard Leck, Head of Oceans from the World Wide Fund for Nature-Australia stated at the time<\/a>, \u201cis clear and unequivocal that the Australian government is not doing enough to protect our greatest natural asset, especially on climate change.\u201d<\/p>\n

The response from Ley was indignant<\/a>.\u00a0 \u201cClearly there were politics behind it; clearly those politics have subverted a proper process.\u201d\u00a0 Why, she insisted, was Australia being singled out, given that there \u201care 83 natural World Heritage properties facing climate change threats\u201d?\u00a0 China, as the chair of the World Heritage Committee, was looked upon as being a deciding, prejudicial factor.\u00a0 Ley warned<\/a> that this process risked \u201cdamaging [the] integrity of the World Heritage System.\u201d<\/p>\n

Due and proper process are not strong points for the Morrison government.\u00a0 But politicising procedure certainly is.\u00a0 Ley proceeded to screech and lobby against the move, leaving behind a hefty carbon footprint in convincing countries that Australia had been wronged.\u00a0 At the general assembly of the UN\u2019s World Heritage Convention, Australia\u2019s representatives claimed that any such decision might not be reversible.<\/p>\n

The central concern here was a lack of clarity on how any change could be possible given the need for a more global approach.\u00a0 \u201cWhat, in particular,\u201d asked<\/a> Australian government representative James Larsen of the general assembly, \u201cis the route off<\/em> the \u2018in danger\u2019 list for a single property if the dangers concerned are global developments that require global solutions?\u201d\u00a0 The Australian effort was successful enough to convince 12 of the 21 voting members to refrain from changing the status of the Reef.\u00a0 Environmental vandalism had again won through.<\/p>\n

Such funding promises as that of the Morrison government are decidedly narrow, the stuff of spreadsheet wonks and committees.\u00a0 These are almost always doomed to failure.\u00a0 Throw money at the problem in isolation, tinker with that deficiency, and ignore the more calamitous, expansive picture.\u00a0 John C. Day and Scott F. Heron, both of James Cook University, summarise the point<\/a>: \u201cWhile the new funding is meant to address other threats to the natural wonder and may improve its resilience, failing to address the climate threat is both disappointing and nonsensical.\u201d<\/p>\n

The picture painted by Day and Heron is bleak.\u00a0 In December 2021, the ocean temperatures on the Reef proved to be the warmest on record<\/a>.\u00a0 The risk of a fourth mass bleaching event in this decade was very much a serious proposition.<\/p>\n

Both the Commonwealth and Queensland governments have also shown an appetite for approving new coal and gas projects, which bring with them a greater expansion of ports and increased shipping.\u00a0 This is despite warnings stretching back years, including a 2013 declaration<\/a> by concerned scientists about industrial development of the Great Barrier Reef coast.\u00a0 \u201cAs scientists, we therefore are concerned about the additional pressures that will be exerted by expansion of coastal ports and industrial development accompanied by a projected near-doubling in shipping, major coastal reclamation works, large-scale seabed dredging and dredge soil disposal.\u201d<\/p>\n

To date, compliance with such restrictions as fertiliser runoff that find their way into the Reef system and attempts to limit agricultural and clearing activities in reef catchment areas, has been uneven.\u00a0 Improving water quality, Day and Heron write<\/a>, is not merely a matter of disbursing more funds, but more effective spending.\u00a0 But a de facto election campaign is underway, and climate change and coral bleaching can wait \u2013 so the voters are being told.<\/p>The post Great Barrier Reef Fantasies: The Morrison Government\u2019s Electoral Ploy<\/a> first appeared on Dissident Voice<\/a>.\n

This post was originally published on Dissident Voice<\/a>. <\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

There are some things that strain credulity.\u00a0 There are the dubious accounts of virgin births.\u00a0 There are the resolute flat earth theorists and denialists of the moon landing.\u00a0 To this can be added the environmental stance of Australia\u2019s Scott Morrison and his ministers, one resolutely opposed to the empirical world.\u00a0 We are now at the [\u2026]<\/p>\n

The post Great Barrier Reef Fantasies: The Morrison Government\u2019s Electoral Ploy<\/a> first appeared on Dissident Voice<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":30,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[175,634,50,393,30468,20461],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/502742"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/30"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=502742"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/502742\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":503000,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/502742\/revisions\/503000"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=502742"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=502742"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=502742"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}