{"id":50285,"date":"2021-02-23T11:58:14","date_gmt":"2021-02-23T11:58:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/law\/2021\/feb\/23\/no-10-rejects-plan-for-peers-to-examine-genocide-claims"},"modified":"2021-02-23T17:17:24","modified_gmt":"2021-02-23T17:17:24","slug":"no-10-rejects-plan-for-peers-to-examine-genocide-claims","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/2021\/02\/23\/no-10-rejects-plan-for-peers-to-examine-genocide-claims\/","title":{"rendered":"Peers vote for ‘judicial committee’ to assess genocide claims"},"content":{"rendered":"
Proposal is attempt to find compromise on issue after two rejections in Commons
<\/p>
The government\u2019s marathon resistance to giving the UK judiciary any role in determining if a country is committing genocide has suffered a fresh blow after peers voted to set up an ad hoc five-strong parliamentary judicial committee to assess evidence of genocide crimes. The peers voted in favour by a majority of 367 to 214, a majority of 153.<\/p>
It is the third time peers have voted for the measure in various forms and Tory whips will have to face down a third rebellion on the issue<\/a> when the trade bill returns to the Commons. The judicial but parliamentary genocide assessment would be made if the government was planning to sign a new trade or economic agreement and would be most relevant to claims that China is committing genocide against the Uighur Muslims in Xinjiang province<\/a>.<\/p> Related: <\/span>UK ministers accused of cynically blocking clear vote on genocide<\/a> <\/p> Continue reading...<\/a>\n