{"id":51510,"date":"2021-02-24T07:22:59","date_gmt":"2021-02-24T07:22:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.radiofree.org\/?p=166156"},"modified":"2021-02-24T07:22:59","modified_gmt":"2021-02-24T07:22:59","slug":"refriended-in-defeat-australia-strikes-a-deal-with-facebook","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/2021\/02\/24\/refriended-in-defeat-australia-strikes-a-deal-with-facebook\/","title":{"rendered":"Refriended in Defeat: Australia Strikes a Deal with Facebook"},"content":{"rendered":"

The Australian Treasurer, Josh Frydenberg, was unconvincing in his efforts to summon up courage.  The Australian government had been left reeling in the wake of Facebook\u2019s decision<\/a> to scrap and block Australians from sharing and posting news items on hosted pages. The company\u2019s target of opprobrium: the News Media Bargaining Code<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The Code\u2019s ostensible purpose is to address the inequalities in the news market place by pushing digital giants and news outlets into reaching commercial deals.  Failing to do so will lead to final offer arbitration between the parties, where the independent arbitrator selects one of the deals on offer.  That selection would be binding on both parties.<\/p>\n

Facebook was having none of it, with its managing director for Facebook Australia and New Zealand William Easton stating<\/a> that the scheme \u201cfundamentally misunderstands the relationship between our platform and publishers who use it to share news content.\u201d  Left with \u201ca stark choice\u201d \u2013 to either comply with the law drafted in ignorance of such realities, \u201cor stop allowing news content on our services in Australia\u201d, Facebook preferred the latter option.  The main objective, then, was for Facebook to press the Australian government to abandon the code altogether or, what was more likely, soften the terms of its application.<\/p>\n

On February 23, after a five day digital siege which saw outrage<\/a> from numerous community, charity, media and political organisations across the country, Frydenberg announced<\/a> that Facebook had \u201cre-friended\u201d Australia.  He was resolute on the point that the amendments did not take away from the Code\u2019s central features: it remained mandatory, was \u201cworld leading\u201d and \u201cbased on a two way value exchange.\u201d It retained a final offer arbitration mechanism.  The Treasurer also thanked Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg for \u201cthe constructive nature of the discussions\u201d and asserted that the object of this whole exercise was \u201cto sustain public interest journalism in this country.\u201d  For a government that has encouraged the prosecution<\/a> of whistleblowers and threatened the prosecution of journalists for engaging in that very journalism, dark ironies continue to bubble.<\/p>\n

Facebook would have been softly chuckling at the amendments or \u201cclarifications\u201d, as Frydenberg preferred to call them.  The joint press release<\/a> from the Treasurer and Paul Fletcher, the Minister for Communications, outlines what can only be regarded as capitulations.  Whether the digital platform in question will be designated by the Treasurer as one needing to cough up the appropriate remuneration will depend on whether it \u201chas made a significant contribution to the sustainability of the Australian news industry through reaching commercial agreements with news media businesses\u201d.  At this writing, Facebook is doing that very thing.<\/p>\n

The platform will receive notification by the government that it has been designated prior to any final decision, with a one month notice period.  Non-differentiation provisions will not be triggered where commercial agreements yielded \u201cdifferent remuneration amounts or commercial outcomes that arose in the course of actual business practices\u201d.  The brutal market knows best.<\/p>\n

Finally, resort to final offer arbitration will only take place as a matter of \u201clast resort where commercial deals cannot be reached by requiring mediation, in good faith\u201d after a period of two months.<\/p>\n

Whether expressed in a fit of delusion or disingenuousness, the ministers also make the unsubstantiated claim that the amendments would \u201cstrengthen the hand of regional and small publishers in obtaining appropriate remuneration for the use of their content by the digital platforms.\u201d<\/p>\n

Sue Greenwood of York St. John University based in the UK argues<\/a> that the opposite outcome is more likely, with the proposed law leaving \u201csmaller or local news providers in a weaker position\u201d, disadvantaged relative to those who \u201cdeliver content which gets more clicks and shares on Facebook\u201d, thereby improving their negotiating position.<\/p>\n

While the predatory practices of Big Tech are to be lamented and loathed, this Code is a sprawl of potential failings.  It has puzzled and alarmed<\/a> the inventor of the World Wide Web, Tim Berners-Lee for \u201cbreaching a fundamental principle of the web by requiring payment for linking between certain content online.\u201d  Gratis linking, \u201cmeaning without limitations regarding the content of the linked site and without monetary fees \u2013 is fundamental to how the web operates.\u201d<\/p>\n

It has induced much head scratching on the part of economists, not least because the Code seems to encourage failing industries and potentially benefit other media giants, such as Rupert Murdoch\u2019s unsavoury News Corp.  This is the unrepentant view<\/a> of former Australian Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd.  \u201cThe problem with the government\u2019s current response to the challenges of the digital media marketing code is that it seeks to solve one problem \u2026 by enhancing the power of the existing monopoly \u2013 that\u2019s Murdoch.\u201d<\/p>\n

The Code has also caused consternation to digital activists for not addressing privacy concerns.  It does nothing to counter the concentration of information and relentless data extraction known as surveillance capitalism, defined<\/a> by Shoshana Zuboff \u201cas the unilateral claiming of private human experience as free raw material for translation into behavioural data.\u201d  That data is sold, in turn, to corporate players to target human behaviour in a predictive way.<\/p>\n

The other digital giant no doubt doing a jig in light of these announcements will be Google, who, despite bullying threats<\/a> to withdraw its search engine from the antipodes, preferred frenetic negotiations.  To date, the company is boasting of striking deals with dozens of Australian media outlets as part of its News Showcase<\/a>.  It can already make a good argument for not being \u201cdesignated\u201d for contributing to the sustainability of the Australian news industry.<\/p>\n

A victory, then, for the digital giants.  A tail-between-the-legs capitulation from Canberra, and a single, dagger directed blow at the barely breathing body of Australian democracy.  And just to add appropriately salted insult to wounding injury, Facebook promises that it may well do it again.  The digital brutes have been emboldened.<\/p>\n

This article was posted on Tuesday, February 23rd, 2021 at 11:22pm and is filed under Australia<\/a>, Facebook<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n

This post was originally published on Radio Free<\/a>. <\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Australian Treasurer, Josh Frydenberg, was unconvincing in his efforts to summon up courage.\u00a0 The Australian government had been left reeling in the wake of Facebook\u2019s decision to\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":30,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[175,725,4],"tags":[179,8321],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51510"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/30"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=51510"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51510\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":51511,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51510\/revisions\/51511"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=51510"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=51510"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=51510"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}