Secretary of state for Northern Ireland Brandon Lewis has dismissed claims from Stormont\u2019s finance minister that he does not have the money to fund a victims\u2019 payment scheme.<\/p>\n
Conor Murphy asserted that the Executive coffers will not stretch to cover the costs of the scheme, which seeks to compensate people injured during the 1968-98 conflict. But Lewis, who said the first year of the scheme could cost under \u00a329 million, highlighted that the Executive had an underspend of millions in the current financial year.<\/p>\n
The remarks come amid an ongoing stand-off between the Northern Ireland Office and Stormont Executive over who will foot a potential \u00a31.2 billion total bill for the delayed payments for those injured during the conflict.<\/p>\n
Earlier this month, the Court of Appeal in Belfast ruled that Stormont had a legal duty to fund the payment scheme for injured victims of the conflict. It made no finding on the source of that funding. Instead it gave the Executive and Northern Ireland Office four weeks to agree a solution.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
During the ongoing impasse, Lewis has singled out Murphy and Sinn F\u00e9in for criticism. On Wednesday, the Northern Ireland secretary again criticised the Stormont minister.<\/p>\n
He told BBC Radio Ulster<\/em>:<\/p>\n With a \u00a315 billion (Treasury) block grant from the year where they\u2019ve had an underspend, that they can\u2019t find the few million pound they need to find for what is a priority, what\u2019s been a legal commitment, what has been there since 2014, for the Sinn F\u00e9in Department of Finance minister to continue to delay this is untenable. How can he stand there and say with any kind of credibility that from a \u00a315 billion block grant approximately, that he is not prepared to make decisions to allocate a few million pounds to the victims\u2019 payment scheme that they are committed to since 2014?\u201d<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n Lewis’ comments came after his Tuesday meeting with Murphy, first minister Arlene Foster, deputy first minister Michelle O\u2019Neill and justice minister Naomi Long to discuss the funding dispute.<\/span><\/p>\n The Conservative MP said the situation emphasised the need for the finance minister to press ahead with setting up a delayed independent spending oversight body.<\/p>\n Stormont parties committed to establishing a Fiscal Council in the New Decade, New Approach deal to restore powersharing. The independent body, which was supposed to be set up by July last year, was designed to conduct an annual assessment of the Executive\u2019s plans to balance its budget.\u00a0It would also examine the ongoing sustainability of departmental finances and assess the effectiveness of long-term efficiency measures.<\/p>\n Lewis said such a council could provide \u201ctransparency\u201d on Murphy\u2019s claims that there are not sufficient funds to pay for the victims\u2019 scheme.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n But Murphy disputed Lewis\u2019s position, and also said the first year estimate is as high as \u00a3145 million. Accusing Lewis of \u201cdithering and delay\u201d, Murphy said the UK Government should pay for the scheme because it legislated for it as Westminster. he\u00a0said:<\/p>\n The Victims Payment Scheme was designed at Westminster and policy decisions were taken there<\/p><\/blockquote>\n He added:<\/p>\n Funding for it also needs to come from there.<\/p>\n The Executive\u2019s budgets are already stretched and the pension could amount to costs of up to \u00a31.2 billion.<\/p>\n Therefore it is disappointing that Mr Lewis continues to claim that the pension will cost \u00a328 million in the first year when he knows that the Government Actuary\u2019s Department has estimated the cost at between \u00a370 million and \u00a3145 million in the first year.<\/p>\n It is time the British Government acted to pay for the scheme it created so that victims should not have to face any further delays.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Arlene Foster, meanwhile, has made clear that victims will get their payments, regardless of who ultimately funds them.<\/p>\n She told BBC Radio Ulster<\/em> on Wednesday:<\/p>\n It\u2019s important to say to people this morning, regardless of where the money comes from, whether it comes from the Executive or from the British Government, that the Executive will be paying the money when it falls due because that is our legal duty and it\u2019s very important to say that.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n The Executive has recently received costing predictions from the government\u2019s Actuary Department based on numbers provided by the Executive Office.<\/p>\n Those range from \u00a3600 million to \u00a31.2 billion for the lifetime of the scheme, with a central estimate of \u00a3848 million.<\/p>\n The scheme should have been open for applications at the end of May last year. It was first delayed when Sinn F\u00e9in refused to designate a Stormont department to administer it. The party objected to government eligibility criteria that excluded former paramilitaries convicted of causing serious harm.<\/p>\n O\u2019Neill eventually agreed to nominate a department last August following a highly critical court judgment that found she had been acting unlawfully.<\/p>\n However, the separate stand-off involving the Government and the wider Stormont Executive over funding remains unresolved.<\/p>\n By The Canary<\/a><\/p>\n\n This post was originally published on The Canary<\/a>. <\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The Northern Ireland Secretary said it is not credible for Stormont\u2019s Finance Minister to say the Executive does not have the money for the scheme.<\/p>\nFiscal Council could provide “transparency”<\/h5>\n
“Dithering and delay”<\/h5>\n
“Our legal duty”<\/h5>\n