{"id":623858,"date":"2022-04-26T10:00:40","date_gmt":"2022-04-26T10:00:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/theintercept.com\/?p=394807"},"modified":"2022-04-26T10:00:40","modified_gmt":"2022-04-26T10:00:40","slug":"bottled-water-giant-bluetriton-admits-claims-of-recycling-and-sustainability-are-puffery","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/2022\/04\/26\/bottled-water-giant-bluetriton-admits-claims-of-recycling-and-sustainability-are-puffery\/","title":{"rendered":"Bottled Water Giant BlueTriton Admits Claims of Recycling and Sustainability Are “Puffery”"},"content":{"rendered":"

In ongoing litigation<\/u> over the greenwashing of plastic recycling, the bottled water company BlueTriton made a revealing argument: its claims of being environmentally friendly aren\u2019t violations of the law, because they are \u201caspirational.\u201d<\/p>\n

BlueTriton \u2014 which owns Poland Spring, Pure Life, Splash, Ozarka, and Arrowhead, among many other brands \u2014\u00a0is estimated to contribute hundreds of millions of pounds of plastic to U.S. landfills each year. BlueTriton used to be known as Nestl\u00e9 Waters North America, which was bought by the private equity firm One Rock Capital Partners in March 2021.\u00a0The company, which has a history of\u00a0draining aquifers<\/a>\u00a0to get the water that it encases in polluting plastic, owns about a third of bottled water brands in the U.S. Yet with sleek, green \u2014 and blue \u2014 PR materials, BlueTriton\u00a0markets itself as a solution to the problems of plastic waste and water.<\/p>\n

\u201cWater is at the very core of our sustainable efforts to meet the needs of future generations,\u201d BlueTriton declares on its website<\/a>, spelling out its promise for sustainable stewardship over a picture of pine trees, pristine water, and clouds. The company\u2019s Instagram account is similarly nature-oriented and wholesome, filled with green-tinged images of people hiking<\/a> and enhancing the native trout population<\/a>.<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

The claims were a bridge too far for the environmental group Earth Island Institute, which sued<\/a> BlueTriton in August, arguing that its misleading sustainability claims violate a local Washington, D.C., law known as the Consumer Protection Procedures Act, which is designed to prevent \u201cdeceptive trade practices.\u201d In response, the company defended its green self-promotion by explaining that everyone should realize that the claims are meaningless nonsense.<\/p>\n

\u201cMany of the statements at issue here constitute non-actionable puffery,\u201d BlueTriton\u2019s attorneys wrote in a motion to dismiss<\/a> the case submitted to a D.C. court in March. \u201cBlueTriton\u2019s representation of itself as \u2018a guardian of sustainable resources\u2019 and \u2018a company who, at its core, cares about water\u2019 is vague and hyperbolic,\u201d the attorneys continued. \u201cBecause these statements are \u2018couched in aspirational terms,\u2019 they cannot serve as the basis for Plaintiff\u2019s CPPA claim.\u201d<\/p>\n

Dirty Business<\/h2>\n

When BlueTriton picked a new logo in April 2021, it explained its choice on Instagram<\/a> as a nod to its commitment to nature and environmentalism. \u201cTriton is a god of the sea in classical Greek mythology,\u201d the company wrote. \u201cCombined with the color blue, representing water, the new name and logo reflect our role as a guardian of sustainable resources and a provider of fresh water.\u201d<\/p>\n

Several of its brands go even further, suggesting that they are helping address the plastic problem because the bottles can in principle be recycled. BlueTriton brands Poland Spring, Ozarka, and Zephyrhills Water advertise that \u201cWe use #1PET plastic, which can be used over and over again!\u201d Pure Life water boasts that all its bottles are \u201c100% recyclable \u2026 and can be used for new bottles and all sorts of new, reusable things.\u201d Deer Park claims that its recyclable bottles help \u201ckeep plastic out of landfills\u201d and that the company \u201ccare[s] about you & our planet.\u201d<\/p>\n

In truth, there is overwhelming evidence<\/a> that recycling cannot solve the plastic problem. Since the 1950s, only 9 percent of plastic produced has been recycled, while the vast majority of plastic waste is either landfilled or incinerated. Six times<\/a> more plastic waste is burned than recycled in the United States. Packaging, including the PET bottles that BlueTriton brands describe as recyclable, account for more than half the plastic that winds up in landfills.<\/p>\n\n

As the complaint notes, plastic pollution is now so widespread that the average person is drinking more than 1,700 tiny bits of plastic in a week\u2019s worth of drinking water \u2014 the equivalent of an entire credit card. Microplastics are found in 94.4 percent of tap water samples in the U.S. and\u00a0may be an even bigger problem in bottled water, despite bottled water companies marketing their product as pollution-free. One BlueTriton brand, Pure Life, had twice the level of plastic fibers as tap water.<\/p>\n

Meanwhile, as BlueTriton touts itself as a solution to America\u2019s water problems, it has been caught extracting water from the national forest<\/a> without authorization. The practice of tapping into natural water supplies has been shown to drain aquifers and rivers, taking water from plants and animals as well as public drinking water reserves.
\n

\n\"corporate-promise-recycle-material-beyond-plastics1\"\n\n

Graphic: Beyond Plastic<\/p><\/div><\/p>\n

Empty Promises<\/h2>\n

With rising public awareness of the role played by bottled water companies in the plastic pollution crisis, companies have publicly pledged to do better. In 2008, Nestl\u00e9 Waters North America committed to recycling 60 percent of PET bottles by 2018. The company proudly announced<\/a> its intentions in its first corporate citizenship report (which is no longer available online). But when the deadline came and its recycling rate was still less than half of its goal \u2014 just 28.9 percent, according to a 2020 report<\/a> by the Changing Markets Foundation \u2014 the company just issued another pledge<\/a>\u00a0rather than dwelling on its failure to meet the earlier one.<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

The\u00a0loud announcement of lofty goals for plastic recycling followed\u00a0by the\u00a0quiet failure to meet them is part of a larger\u00a0pattern<\/a>. Since at least 1990<\/a>, Coca-Cola has made repeated<\/a> promises on the plastics front, including commitments to use more recycled plastic, recover and refill more of its bottles, and incorporate more plant-based materials. The company, which has fought against<\/a> efforts that would reduce plastic waste and recently hired Bill Nye<\/a> to help clean up its image, regularly rolls out these goals with much fanfare and rarely, if ever, meets them. Coca-Cola did not respond to an inquiry for this story.<\/p>\n

The distances between PR and reality are particularly pronounced around pledges to increasingly rely on\u00a0recycled plastic, which is far more expensive to use than new plastic. According to\u00a0Beyond Plastics, 10 major corporations \u2014 including L\u2019Or\u00e9al, Unilever, Nestl\u00e9, and PepsiCo \u2014\u00a0had promised vast reductions in their dependence on virgin plastic while continuing to rely on new plastic. The environmental advocacy organization\u00a0based its findings on 2019 data, the most recent available.<\/p>\n

BlueTriton, which does not publicly list a media contact and provides no way for reporters to ask questions, did not respond to an inquiry from The Intercept for this article (which was conveyed through a message left with the sales department).\u00a0But in its filing that asks the court to dismiss the greenwashing suit, the company argues that some of its brands have taken several steps that show they are genuinely sustainable. It says that Pure Life, for instance, has converted the cooling towers in its bottling plants to reuse water that was previously discharged. And that company is also \u201creduc[ing] the amount of plastic in our 0.5 liter bottles by over 40%\u201d and \u201cimproving our production processes to reduce the amount of water needed to make one liter of Pure Life\u00ae purified water.\u201d One Rock Capital Partners, the private equity firm that bought Nestl\u00e9 Waters North America, also did not respond to an inquiry from The Intercept.<\/p>\n

\u201cThey’re admitting that they use these sustainability commitments just as marketing tools.\u201d<\/blockquote>\n

Sumona Majumdar, general counsel at the Earth Island Institute, dismissed those claims. \u201cYou can\u2019t claim to be a sustainable company while using plastic as your primary packaging,\u201d said Majumdar. \u201cMaybe there was a time when, as a company, you might have thought our plastic is getting recycled and getting turned back into plastic. But at this point, everybody knows that’s not true.\u201d<\/p>\n

Majumdar counts the company\u2019s executives among those\u00a0who clearly understand that they are contributing to the plastic waste crisis \u2014 even as their spin suggests otherwise.<\/p>\n

\u201cWhen you look at their Instagram feeds and their statements about sustainability, it seems like a fait accompli. But in this brief they filed, they’re admitting that they use these sustainability commitments just as marketing tools,\u201d said Majumdar. \u201cIt\u2019s just to get consumers to buy their goods, and not because they actually intend to follow through with their promises.\u201d<\/p>\n

The post Bottled Water Giant BlueTriton Admits Claims of Recycling and Sustainability Are “Puffery”<\/a> appeared first on The Intercept<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n

This post was originally published on The Intercept<\/a>. <\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

BlueTriton, owner of Poland Spring and other brands of water packaged in plastic, stated in a court filing that its claims of sustainability are “vague and hyperbolic.”<\/p>\n

The post Bottled Water Giant BlueTriton Admits Claims of Recycling and Sustainability Are \u201cPuffery\u201d<\/a> appeared first on The Intercept<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":106,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[393],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/623858"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/106"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=623858"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/623858\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":623859,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/623858\/revisions\/623859"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=623858"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=623858"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=623858"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}