{"id":723002,"date":"2022-06-29T10:45:00","date_gmt":"2022-06-29T10:45:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/grist.org\/?p=575618"},"modified":"2022-06-29T10:45:00","modified_gmt":"2022-06-29T10:45:00","slug":"logging-is-destroying-southern-forests-and-dividing-us-environmentalists","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/2022\/06\/29\/logging-is-destroying-southern-forests-and-dividing-us-environmentalists\/","title":{"rendered":"Logging is destroying southern forests \u2014 and dividing US environmentalists"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

In the fight against climate change, the $300-billion U.S. logging and woods products industry has positioned itself as a purveyor of \u201cnatural climate solutions.\u201d The idea is intuitive: Trees are the ultimate renewable resource. After they are cut they can be replanted, absorbing carbon once again as they mature. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Wood energy succored Homo sapiens and its ancestors for millions of years, the argument goes, and only during the last couple of centuries was it replaced with fossil fuels like coal. As our civilization begins the slow process of jettisoning fossil energy, logging interests assure us that wood products are not a retrogression but a way forward. The industry claims that forests that are felled sustainably \u2014 for construction, say, or for burning to produce electricity in utility-scale power plants \u2014 can provide jobs and energy, stimulate the economy, and even reduce society\u2019s net carbon emissions. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Weyerhaeuser, the world’s largest private owner of timber as well as its largest paper and pulp company, now markets<\/a> how \u201cwood products help remove and store CO2 and reduce the impacts of climate change.\u201d The U.S. Industrial Pellet Association, a lobbying group for the biomass industry, proclaims<\/a> that burning wood pellets from logged trees is \u201cone of our best available tools to mitigate climate change, and achieve renewable energy goals.\u201d The National Alliance of Forest Owners, a timber industry lobby group, has trumpeted<\/a> \u201cthe important role sustainably managed forests and forest products can play in mitigating climate change.\u201d In 2020, the CEOs of dozens of forestry businesses announced \u201can agreement of principles”<\/a> stipulating that logged forests are beneficial for the climate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"green
A map touts the environmental benefits of Weyerhaeuser\u2019s wood operations in the company\u2019s headquarters in Seattle, Washington. Genna Martin \/ Seattlepi.com via Getty images<\/cite><\/figcaption><\/div><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

This rosy view of logging, however, is hotly contested. In 2020, more than a hundred climate and forest scientists submitted a letter to Congress<\/a> advising lawmakers not to trust the industry\u2019s sustainability claims. There is no evidence, the scientists said, \u201cto support increased logging to store more carbon in wood products, such as [for] buildings,\u201d no evidence to \u201csupport the burning of wood in place of fossil fuels as a climate solution,\u201d and no reason to support \u201clegislative proposals that would promote logging and wood consumption,\u201d as industry has lobbied for. The scientists counseled instead, to mitigate the climate crisis, the U.S. would need to \u201cshift away from consumption of wood products and forest biomass energy.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Nevertheless, the industry has garnered some allies among green groups. The signatories of the 2020 \u201cagreement of principles\u201d included conservation nonprofits like the Environmental Defense Fund, the American Forest Foundation, American Forests, and the Nature Conservancy, or TNC, the largest and wealthiest nonprofit conservation organization in the U.S. These groups signed on<\/a> to natural climate solutions as \u201coptimiz[ing] the carbon potential of the private working forest [through] the manufacture of sustainable forest products,\u201d and they signaled their alignment with dozens of timber and forest products companies in support of \u201cworking forests\u201d and \u201cmanaged forests\u201d \u2014 industry euphemisms for logged forests.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"aerial
A stroke boom delimber clears an area of lodgepole pine trees.\n Chip Somodevilla \/ Getty Images<\/cite><\/figcaption><\/div><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The entanglement of the wood products industry and these nonprofits stretches beyond the 2020 agreement. The Environmental Defense Fund, the American Forest Foundation, American Forests, and TNC are also members of the Forest-Climate Working Group, a political advocacy organization, alongside scores of wood product companies, including Enviva and Drax, biomass energy behemoths whose carbon-intensive<\/a> operations have polluted U.S. communities and destroyed<\/a> U.S. forests. The Forest-Climate Working Group\u2019s policy platform<\/a> for Congress urges the use of more wood in buildings, including in federal buildings, an expansion of state programs that promote the use of more wood products, and an increase in funding for federal Wood Innovation Grants \u201cto stimulate \u2026 new forest product uses, and new or expanded forest products markets.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

These efforts are ostensibly in pursuit of a climate-friendly economy, the working group\u2019s members having \u201cfound common ground on forest-related solutions to climate change\u201d while representing a \u201cunified voice across the U.S. forestry sector.\u201d But some critics have called the Forest-Climate Working Group a greenwashing operation. \u201cThey give credence to the false narrative that expanding wood markets is essential to solving the climate crisis,\u201d said Danna Smith, executive director of Dogwood Alliance, a conservation nonprofit in Asheville, North Carolina.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In the case of The Nature Conservancy, in particular, the ties to timber interests have sometimes been explicit. In 2006, TNC received a $1 million gift<\/a> from the timber behemoth Weyerhaeuser that included a statement that the two entities \u201cagreed to work collaboratively to improve their understanding of managed forests.\u201d Until recently, millionaire hedge fund manager and major Enviva backer Jeffrey Ubben<\/a> sat on a TNC investment advisory board and on Enviva\u2019s board simultaneously. (In response to inquiries from Grist, a TNC spokesperson said that Ubben \u201chad no governing authority\u201d in his role and \u201cis no longer affiliated with The Nature Conservancy in any capacity.\u201d)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

TNC\u2019s entanglement with logging interests has made enemies of other green groups that might have been natural allies. On April 5, a coalition of more than 150 conservation, environmental, and social justice organizations signed an open letter<\/a> to the Conservancy\u2019s CEO, Jennifer Morris, charging that TNC was \u201cpromoting policies that favor the financial interests of the industrial logging and wood products industry at the expense of solving the climate crisis, protecting nature and advancing environmental justice.\u201d The coalition demanded that TNC stop \u201cpromoting false climate solutions\u201d that \u201ccenter the financial interests of large lumber, pulp\/paper, biomass\/wood-pellet and other corporations.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"a
A sign in Weyerhaeuser\u2019s Seattle headquarters references what what business leaders see as their environmental legacy.\n Genna Martin \/ Seattlepi.com via Getty images<\/cite><\/figcaption><\/div><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

This was effectively a declaration of war in the genteel world of environmental nonprofits. Two of the authors of the letter, Dogwood Alliance\u2019s Smith and the Reverend Leo Woodberry, pastor of the Living Kingdom Temple in Florence, South Carolina, co-edited an accompanying 35-page report<\/a> titled \u201cThe Nature Conspiracy,\u201d which focused on the effect of pro-logging politics in the poorest parts of the coastal plain states of the American South. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The report cites data showing that southeastern states were logged at four times the rate of the Amazon Basin during the first decade of the 21st century, making the region the most logged place on the planet. The insatiable demand for consumer wood products has been the primary cause of deforestation there, but the growing new demand is for wood pellets that are burned in overseas biomass plants to produce electricity, primarily in Europe. Smith calls the rush for wood pellets the most concentrated assault on southern forests since the invention of paper towels. The value of exported pellets in the U.S. has grown from around $250 million in 2012 to over $1 billion in 2021.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Smith, who says that Ubben was removed from his advisory role at TNC only after she told the nonprofit\u2019s CEO that it constituted a conflict of interest, believes that TNC\u2019s ties to the wood pellet industry should be enough to make it a pariah in environmental justice communities. \u201cLogging for biomass is in rural African American areas, the Black belt of the U.S. south,\u201d she told me. Not only is logging for all kinds of products \u2014 pellets, paper, pulp, lumber \u2014 concentrated in the Black belt, so too are many of the pellet mills, whose toxic emissions have sickened residents. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A TNC spokesperson told Grist that \u201cThe Nature Conspiracy\u201d contains \u201cfactual errors and misinformation,\u201d and emphasized that TNC\u2019s position is that \u201cbioenergy is not carbon neutral.\u201d The spokesperson insisted that TNC has no involvement in wood pellet production and instead \u201cfocuses on the use of biomass that is a by-product of forest restoration and management activities such as thinning fire-prone forests.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\n <\/span>\n
\n \n
\n \"Surplus\n <\/figure>\n
\n
\n Biofuels are getting a second look \u2014 and some tough questions<\/a>\n <\/div>\n
\n \n
\n Matt Reynolds<\/a> <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/article>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

\u201cWhile both TNC and The Dogwood Alliance share a commitment to working on forest conservation, climate change and environmental justice issues, we must also share the knowledge that reasonable people can disagree on approaches,\u201d the spokesperson said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Last September, I joined Smith for a trip across a stretch of the Black belt where North and South Carolina meet in the watersheds of the Pee Dee and Lumber Rivers, a hundred miles from the Atlantic coast. The area is heavily logged, and at just about every bend of the road there were vast clearcuts, ugly stretches of land that had been scalped. The dominant industries in this part of the Carolinas are those that feed on the forests: wood pellet mills, paper mills, pulp processors, and power plants that burn wood chips. \u201cYou can go anywhere across the coastal plain and find the same dynamic,\u201d said Smith as we drove. \u201cI\u2019m 55, and in my lifetime I\u2019ve seen a landscape-level change.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Smith grew up in South Carolina, acquainted with swamps, cypresses, snakes, and the bewitching light of the wetland woods. After a dispiriting stint in corporate law, she turned to full-time environmentalism, joining Dogwood Alliance in 1997 and becoming its executive director at the age of 30. \u201cI knew how to gather evidence and build a case,\u201d she told me, \u201cto advocate for the trees and the forests.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"a
A sign welcoms people to Marion County, South Carolina. \n Jeffrey Collins \/ AP Photo<\/cite><\/figcaption><\/div><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

We were headed to the 2,000-person, majority-Black town of Britton\u2019s Neck in Marion County. We passed dozens of clearcuts, the land gray and barren, the slash from the downed trees in sad, jumbled piles. These were followed by plantations of hybridized pines, non-native, bioengineered, planted in rows, even-aged, and, hewing to industry practice, soaked in chemicals to keep the insects off.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The tops of the pines formed unbroken eaves, like the rooftops of rowhouses. \u201cCan you see the tree line, homogenous all the way down?\u201d said Smith. \u201cLook at the perfect rows!\u201d We turned onto South Carolina state highway 41, a few minutes north of Britton\u2019s Neck, and passed a clearcut that formed on both sides of the road an empty prospect as far as the eye could see. The cut went on for miles. \u201cAnd it keeps going, one after another. These are our southern forests. They\u2019re not ecosystems. They\u2019re fiber farms, corporate plantation croplands. This is what TNC is supporting.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Smith had arranged a meeting in Britton\u2019s Neck with Reverend Woodberry, a community organizer who had been dubbed \u201cthe EJ pastor.\u201d Woodberry made a name for himself in the environmental justice community as one of the chief planners of the 2017 People\u2019s Climate March in Washington, DC, which is where Smith met him. The two joined forces that year to help organize residents in Hamlet, North Carolina, to stop construction of an Enviva pellet plant. The effort failed, but in the course of it they became fast friends. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Woodberry is a fierce-looking 69-year-old who likes to bring environmentalism to the pulpit, making connections, for example, between the rivers that became blood in the Biblical Book of Revelation and red tides of toxic algae. \u201cIf we\u2019re stewards of the Earth,\u201d he once told a reporter<\/a>, referring to the Book of Genesis, \u201cwe\u2019re supposed to be doing something about this.\u201d  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"a
The Reverend Leo Woodberry looks out onto the woods in Britton\u2019s Neck, South Carolina. Christopher Ketchum \/ Grist<\/cite><\/figcaption><\/div><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

One of his projects in South Carolina has been the documentation of how logging of wetland forests has led to an increase in flooding. It\u2019s well known among ecologists that intact forests, with their extensive root systems and firm soil, absorb more water during storm events than logged forests. To experience up close the flood devastation that logging brings, however, is altogether different. \u201cWe\u2019ve been in homes where the flooding was so bad the floor has fallen in, and you can peer in and see the ground,\u201d Woodberry told me over the phone before I arrived in the Carolinas. \u201cWe\u2019ve seen homes totally taken over by black mold, where children are sick.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

When I met him, the reverend was accompanied by two members of the Concerned Citizens of Brittons Neck: Johnny B. Graves, 78, and Marvin Woodberry, 66, the reverend\u2019s cousin. The Pee Dee River flows near town, and in 2018, when Hurricane Florence hit, the river leapt its banks, and Johnny B. was evacuated along with some 2,000 residents. Marvin told me he has fled his house three times in the last five years due to flooding. After Hurricane Matthew in 2015, Woodberry tested the local drinking water and discovered it had been infiltrated with pesticides and other chemicals from the surging river, along with contaminants from overflowing sewage systems.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Seeing all this havoc was personal for the reverend. \u201cThis is an old community, formed in 1749,\u201d he told me. \u201cMy family came from here. My uncle says we\u2019ve been here since slavery.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

We came to a halt at a section of cracked tarmac that was the terminus of the last big flood, during Hurricane Florence. Marvin showed me a map of town on his phone. He pointed to an area southeast of where we stood, a half-mile distant, that had been repeatedly logged. Beyond the logged area was the Pee Dee River. \u201cIt\u2019s all through there the water comes, where those trees used to be absorbing the water,\u201d Marvin told me. \u201cWe got to stop this. We got to keep our trees.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cWe got to keep our trees!\u201d echoed the reverend.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\n Read Next<\/span>\n
\n \n
\n \"a\n <\/figure>\n
\n
\n Yes, you can save lives by planting trees, a new study says<\/a>\n <\/div>\n
\n \n
\n Julia Kane<\/a> <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/article>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

At the banks of the Pee Dee River along a dirt road, we came to a stretch of wetland where tall old trees still stood, and the banks sloped to the sleepy black water. It was unlogged land, and it happened to be the spot where Marvin had been baptized when he was a young man. Cypresses towered above us, shaggy with vines, disheveled, their wide trunks furrowed and buttressed. The river ran glassy and slow, the sun shone in clear azure sky, a lone cicada rattled, and a breeze whispered in a stand of loblolly pine. To my northern eyes \u2014 I had never seen cypresses in the flesh \u2014 it was a marvelously exotic scene. To Leo and Marvin Woodberry, it was native ground, and that it hadn\u2019t been logged was meaningful in a way no outsider could comprehend.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The southern coastal plain has become home to biomass mills that gorge on the region\u2019s forests and turn them into wood pellets. The biomass industry asserts that wood pellet production is clean, green, and sustainable. The people I met in the shadow of the mills disagreed. Debra David, a 64-year-old homemaker turned activist, lives three miles from an Enviva mill in Hamlet, NC, which commenced operations in 2019 \u2014 the year, as it happens, that David started having trouble breathing. I met with her last autumn in a one-room Pentecostal church in town, where she and a neighbor and fellow parishioner, 50-year-old Debbie Short, described the collapse of their health.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cI use a nebulizer now. I can hardly walk,\u201d said Short. She attributes her exploding case of asthma to air pollutants from the mill. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cI never had respiratory problems before Enviva came,\u201d David told me. \u201cTwo years ago, I went to the hospital, it got so bad. They put me on a ventilator.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n