{"id":7984,"date":"2020-11-11T12:09:22","date_gmt":"2020-11-11T12:09:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.craigmurray.org.uk\/?p=62218"},"modified":"2020-11-11T12:09:22","modified_gmt":"2020-11-11T12:09:22","slug":"michael-russell-neo-liberal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/2020\/11\/11\/michael-russell-neo-liberal\/","title":{"rendered":"Michael Russell, Neo-Liberal"},"content":{"rendered":"

Mike Russell is claiming<\/a> I have in some way misinterpreted or mis-attributed his detailed advocacy of privatisation of the NHS. I therefore bring you the following published critiques, every one of which has evidently “misunderstood” Mike Russell too. First from Iain MacWhirter in the Scottish Review of Books<\/a>:<\/p>\n

I have to say that Russell\u2019s own ideological adventure rather confirms the need for political parties. Grasping The Thistle \u2013 even the revised version \u2013 is a blueprint for an essentially neo-conservative political revolution in Scotland. He wants to privatise the state, abolish inheritance tax, corporation tax, capital gains tax and introduce the highly regressive flat-rate income tax, which has been introduced in some Eastern European countries like Estonia.<\/p>\n

If Russell were in charge, Scotland would be exposed to something like the \u201cshock therapy\u201d that the Friedmanite ideologues imposed on the Soviet Union after the fall of the Berlin Wall. This would imply, not just a rebalancing of public spending, but the wholesale destruction of the welfare state, taking the clock back to Edwardian Britain before Lloyd George\u2019s People\u2019s Budgets.<\/p>\n

I\u2019m not sure the Scottish people are prepared for such a Year Zero. Imagine the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh having to close because it failed to make a profit. What would happen to the patients? Scotland is a relatively egalitarian country with much less income inequality than England. Under the Russell\/MacLeod revolution it would become a playground for the super-rich, a plutocratic caste with no interest or connection with the ordinary people. Jock Tamson need not apply.<\/p>\n

Grasping The Thistle may be independent thinking, but I\u2019m not entirely sure it is rational thinking. Certainly, these ideas are so far removed from the manifesto of the Scottish National Party that it becomes difficult to know how Russell can remain a member of it. It seems to me that he disagrees with just about everything his own movement stands for: social democracy, Europe, independence, parliamentary democracy, progressive taxation, public services free at the point of need, an oil fund \u2013 the list goes on and on.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Here is Rob Brown in Bella Caledonia<\/a>, who obviously also entirely misunderstood Mike Russell:<\/p>\n

After years of deifying social democracy, monkish Mike Russell suddenly saw the light and realised that right-wing heresy had to become the new orthodoxy within the national movement.<\/p>\n

He devoted all his spare hours \u2013 when not praying for a swift return to that most holy of shrines, Holyrood \u2013 to reading the ancient runes with a businessman called Dennis MacLeod. Together this Druidic duo co-authored a tome dissing almost everything the SNP had stood for in its modern incarnation. Even that most sacred and patriotic of mediaeval parchments the Declaration of Arbroath got debunked in the first few pages.<\/p>\n

The SNP, Russell and MacLeod jointly pontificated, should banish devilish notions of national independence and instead seek to negotiate a \u201cNew Union\u201d with England. Once Westminster conferred its blessing on full fiscal autonomy for Bute House, in return for abolition of the Barnett formula, auld Scotia could then be administered all the shock therapy she so desperately required to be jolted out of her zombie state.<\/p>\n

Our semi-independent government could then go on the lion rampage against the undeserving poor, the idle and the feckless. Scotland\u2019s welfare state and taxes would be slashed, with vouchers introduced to marketize provision of schools and hospitals \u2013 none of which would be supplied through the NHS, since this would be dismantled in favour of an insurance-based health service.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Here is David Gow<\/a> also misunderstanding Mike Russell:<\/p>\n

Already then, however, other, overtly pro-capitalist strands of thinking were developing, often taking on anti-statist blindly pro-market tones (as in Mike Russell\u2019s Grasping the Thistle).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Michael Keating of the University of Aberdeen even failed to grasp the subtleties of Russells “dialogue” on a neo-liberal approach in an academic paper<\/a>:<\/p>\n

There have been advocates of the liberal market strategy in Scotland. While
\nout of parliament, Mike Russell (later SNP Cabinet Secretary for Education) and
\nDennis MacLeod wrote a book promising exactly that, with a drastic reduction in the
\nrole and size of the state and of public spending and taxes (MacLeod and Russell,
\n2006). This was widely seen as an effort to out-Thatcher Margaret Thatcher and
\nseems to have riled the SNP leadership sufficiently for them to have had the text
\ntoned down between proof and publication (Macwhirter, 2006). <\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Gerry Hassan has rushed to Russell’s aid<\/a> online now, but strangely enough also had failed to understand<\/a> Russell did not really mean it:<\/p>\n

Pre-2007, there was the well-intentioned work of Kenny MacAskill (2004) alongside Mike Russell\u2019s advocacy of a host of predictable right-wing and neo-liberal platitudes (MacLeod and Russell 2006).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

While if Mike Russell is not a neo-liberal, it is unfortunate to find him quoted in another academic book<\/a> called Neo-Liberalism in Scotland:<\/p>\n

In his biography of Thatcher, Hugo Young quotes his subject as
\nsaying, \u201cthe Scots invented Thatcherism, long before I was thought of\u201d,
\ndryly adding that this \u201cwas believed to be a reference to Adam Smith, the
\neconomist, and possibly the philosopher David Hume\u201d.12 In her
\nautobiography Thatcher noted with bemusement the failure of her
\n\u201crevolution\u201d to win hearts and minds in Scotland, \u201chome of the very same
\nScottish Enlightenment which produced Adam Smith, the greatest
\nexponent of free enterprise economics till Hayek and Friedman\u201d.13 The
\nmore openly pro-market figures in the SNP, like Michael Russell, have a
\nsimilar view:
\n“Adam Smith was the father of modern capitalism and it is high time that
\nhis own people rediscovered his genius, particularly as, in his own land,
\nthat genius is currently tarnished by the half-baked economic models
\nespoused by most of our political parties.14”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Finally, just to remind you how very bad what Russell and MacLeod wrote about the NHS was:<\/p>\n

Take health first of all. We would encourage the private sector to compete with established NHS hospitals, clinics and other services. We would encourage NHS management and staff to buy out existing NHS facilities and services under favourable financial terms and join the private sector. We would require NHS facilities that remained in government ownership to be run at a profit however modest. Those that failed to maintain profitability over a reasonable time frame would be privatised. In each geographic area the government would solicit bids from the area’s medical facilities and GPs for the various services it required for its citizens. Fragmentation of services may well see the redundancy of large general hospitals and their replacement with privately run clinics specialising and competing in particular medical procedures and services, at least in the more populated areas.<\/p>\n

One idea that is worth further consideration is the possibility that some provision may be supported by “Payment vouchers” made available free of charge to citizens in order that patients would receive treatment wherever they wished. Citizens who wished to make their own arrangements with medical service suppliers would be free to do so. Armed with their voucher they could shop for the fastest and best service and if they so wished add to the value of the voucher.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

—————————————————–<\/p>\n

 
\n 
\nForgive me for pointing out that my ability to provide this coverage is entirely dependent on your kind voluntary subscriptions which keep this blog going. This post is free for anybody to reproduce or republish, including in translation. You are still very welcome to read without subscribing. <\/p>\n

Unlike our adversaries including the Integrity Initiative, the 77th Brigade, Bellingcat, the Atlantic Council and hundreds of other warmongering propaganda operations, this blog has no source of state, corporate or institutional finance whatsoever. It runs entirely on voluntary subscriptions from its readers – many of whom do not necessarily agree with the every article, but welcome the alternative voice, insider information and debate.<\/p>\n

Subscriptions to keep this blog going are gratefully received<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Choose subscription amount from dropdown box:<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n
Recurring Donations<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n
\n\"\"<\/p>\n<\/form>\n

 <\/p>\n

Paypal address for one-off donations: craigmurray1710@btinternet.com<\/p>\n

Alternatively by bank transfer or standing order:<\/strong><\/p>\n

Account name
\nMURRAY CJ
\nAccount number 3 2 1 5 0 9 6 2
\nSort code 6 0 – 4 0 – 0 5
\nIBAN GB98NWBK60400532150962
\nBIC NWBKGB2L
\nBank address Natwest, PO Box 414, 38 Strand, London, WC2H 5JB<\/p>\n

Bitcoin: bc1q3sdm60rshynxtvfnkhhqjn83vk3e3nyw78cjx9<\/p>\n

Subscriptions are still preferred to donations as I can’t run the blog without some certainty of future income, but I understand why some people prefer not to commit to that.<\/p>\n

The post Michael Russell, Neo-Liberal<\/a> appeared first on Craig Murray<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n

This post was originally published on Craig Murray<\/a>. <\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Mike Russell is claiming I have in some way misinterpreted or mis-attributed his detailed advocacy of privatisation of the NHS. I therefore bring you the following published critiques, every one of which has evidently \u201cmisunderstood\u201d Mike Russell too. First from Iain MacWhirter in the Scottish Review of Books: I have to say that Russell\u2019s own [\u2026]<\/p>\n

The post Michael Russell, Neo-Liberal<\/a> appeared first on Craig Murray<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":706,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7984"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/706"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7984"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7984\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7985,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7984\/revisions\/7985"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7984"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7984"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7984"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}