On 17 March 202 Ben McInerny of the international Observatory for Human Rights drew attention to the distressing news that “the British government plans to continue slashing overseas aid, with spending on the newly formed Open Societies and Human Rights directorate set to fall by as much as 80%.”.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Speaking in the House of Commons yesterday, the leader of the SNP Iain Blackford MP condemned the proposals, calling for greater bipartisan oversight of the reduction in aid spending: \u201cOnly this morning, it has emerged that the UK Government also plan to cut their human rights support and anti-corruption measures by a staggering 80%. If the Prime Minister is prepared to stand up for such callous cuts, is he also prepared to guarantee that he will allow for a straight vote on them in the House of Commons?\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n One of the projects reportedly threatened by these cutbacks is a \u00a316m initiative aimed at advancing press freedom across the Middle East and North Africa \u2013 a region which has seen a \u201cdecline in freedom of expression, media freedom and civic space\u201d, according to participants of the 2020 Global Conference for Media Freedom.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The UK took a global role with the launch of the media freedom initiative by the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) under the previous Foreign Secretary, Jeremy Hunt. The UK also co-hosted the 2019 Global Conference for Media Freedom in London. However, though Dominic Raab has been supportive, he has had no direct involvement and this may be reflected in the budget cuts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Despite the UK government\u2019s attempts to depict post-Brexit Britain as a global \u201cforce for good\u201d, these cutbacks come as part of a precipitous contraction of overseas aid spending. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Earlier this month, leaked Foreign Office internal documents revealed proposed aid cutbacks of more than 50%, with Syria and Libya seeing a reduction in funding of 67% and 63% respectively..<\/p>\n\n\n\n David Miliband, president of the International Rescue Committee, said the changes would undermine Britain\u2019s \u201cglobal reputation\u201d, stating that:<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cThe phrase \u2018global Britain\u2019 rings hollow. As the UK prepares to host the G7, the reduction of assistance to Yemen is a stark warning of what is to come as the government delivers on widespread cuts across the entire UK aid portfolio\u201d<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n Andrew Mitchell, Former Shadow Secretary of State for International Development, said reducing the aid budget to less than 0.7% of gross domestic income (GDI) remains unlawful without a change to legislation, adding that:<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cTo grow the budget to 0.7% from 0.5% took four years, but the equivalent cut is being undertaken in a matter of weeks\u201d<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n Boris Johnson has said the decision to cut aid budgets is justified by the current Covid-19 crisis, stating that \u201ccurrent straitened circumstances\u201d make reductions necessary, although no other G7 country is cutting its aid programme to the same extent.<\/p>\n\n\n\n It is imperative that funding, crucial to the provision of humanitarian assistance to some of the world\u2019s most vulnerable groups, be at least 0.7% of GDI. The Covid-19 crisis should not be an excuse to reduce aid spending, but rather a reason to increase it. <\/p>\n\n\n\n