{"id":86311,"date":"2021-03-20T13:58:05","date_gmt":"2021-03-20T13:58:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/radiofree.asia\/?guid=2aca3016e7af119b443aa4f35e5e89ff"},"modified":"2021-03-20T13:58:05","modified_gmt":"2021-03-20T13:58:05","slug":"chomsky-bidens-early-agenda-gives-hope-but-activist-pressure-must-not-cease","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/2021\/03\/20\/chomsky-bidens-early-agenda-gives-hope-but-activist-pressure-must-not-cease\/","title":{"rendered":"Chomsky: Biden\u2019s Early Agenda Gives Hope, But Activist Pressure Must Not Cease"},"content":{"rendered":"\"President<\/a>

Joe Biden\u2019s first months in office have comprised a flurry of actions on the domestic front, including a historic stimulus bill. In this exclusive interview, the celebrated public intellectual Noam Chomsky shares his views on some key policies embraced by the Biden administration. Chomsky is Institute Professor Emeritus at MIT and Laureate Professor of Linguistics at the University of Arizona. His latest books are Climate Crisis and the Global Green New Deal: The Political Economy of Saving the Planet<\/em> (co-authored with Robert Pollin and C. J. Polychroniou; Verso, 2020), Chomsky for Activists<\/em> (Routledge, 2020) and Consequences of Capitalism: Manufacturing Discontent and Resistance<\/em> (Haymarket Books, 2020).<\/p>\n

J. Polychroniou: President Joe Biden has been in office for approximately two months now, in the course of which he has signed scores of executive orders meant to reverse the policies of Donald Trump. But he has also managed to pass a huge and ambitious stimulus bill unlike anything seen during peacetime. What\u2019s your assessment of Biden\u2019s actions so far to deal with the most pressing issues facing U.S. society: namely, the coronavirus pandemic and the pain caused to millions of Americans on account of the pandemic?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Noam Chomsky<\/strong>: Better than I\u2019d anticipated. Considerably so.<\/p>\n

The stimulus bill has its flaws, but considering the circumstances, it\u2019s an impressive achievement. The circumstances are a highly disciplined opposition party dedicated to the principle announced years ago by its maximal leader, Mitch McConnell: If we are not in power, we must render the country ungovernable and block government legislative efforts, however beneficial they might be<\/em>. Then the consequences can be blamed on the party in power, and we can take over.<\/em> It worked well for Republicans in 2009 — with plenty of help from Obama. By 2010, the Democrats lost Congress, and the way was cleared to the 2016 debacle.<\/p>\n

There\u2019s every reason to suppose that the strategy will be renewed — this time under more complex circumstances. The voting base in the hands of Trump, who shares the objective but differs from McConnell on who will pick up the pieces: McConnell and the donor class, or Trump and the voting base he mobilized, almost half of whom<\/a> worship him as the messenger God sent to save the country from \u2026 we can fill in our favorite fantasies, but should not overlook the fact that what may sound [ridiculous] has roots in the lives of the victims of the neoliberal globalization of the past 40 years — extended by Trump, apart from some rhetorical flourishes.<\/p>\n

In those circumstances, passing a stimulus bill was a major accomplishment. Republicans who favor it, and know that their constituents do, nevertheless voted against it, in lockstep obedience to what the Central Committee determines. Some Democrats insisted on watering it down. But what finally passed has valuable elements, which could be a basis for moving on.<\/p>\n

There are huge gaps. The bill surely should have contained an increase in the miserable minimum wage, an utter scandal. But that would have been very difficult in the face of total Republican opposition, along with a few Democrats. And there are other crucial features that are missing. Nevertheless, if the short-term measures on child poverty, income support, medical insurance and other basic needs can be extended, it would be a substantial step toward fulfilling the promise envisioned by such careful observers as Roosevelt Institute President Felicia Wong, who reflected that<\/a>, \u201cAs I see it, both the scale and the direction of the American Rescue Plan break the neoliberal, deficits-and-inflation-come-first mold that has hollowed out our economy for a generation.\u201d We haven\u2019t seen anything that could elicit such hopes for a long time.<\/p>\n

There is also hope in appointments on economic issues. Who would have imagined that a regular contributor to radical economics journals would be appointed to the Council of Economic Advisers (Heather Boushey), joined by the senior economic adviser of the labor-oriented Economic Policy Institute, (Jared Bernstein)?<\/p>\n

Biden\u2019s strong support for Amazon workers, and unions generally, is a welcome shift. Nothing like it has been heard from the chambers of power in many years. In a sharp reversal of Trump legislation, the tax changes raise incomes mostly for the poor, not the rich. Economic Policy Institute President Thea Lee summarizes the package by saying that it \u201cwill provide crucial support to millions of working families; dramatically reduce the race, gender, and income inequalities that were exacerbated by the crisis; and create the conditions for a truly robust recovery once the virus is under control and people are able to resume normal economic activity.\u201d Optimistic, but within reach.<\/p>\n

House Democrats have passed other important legislation. H.R. 1 protects voting rights, a critical matter now, with Republicans working overtime to try to block the votes of [people of color] and the poor, recognizing that this is the only way a minority party dedicated to wealth and corporate power can remain viable.<\/p>\n

On the labor front, the House passed the Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act, \u201ca critical step toward restoring<\/a> workers\u2019 right to organize and bargain collectively,\u201d the Economic Policy Institute reports, a fundamental right that \u201chas been eroded for decades as employers exploited weaknesses in the current law.\u201d It\u2019ll probably be killed by the Senate. Even apart from party loyalty, there is little sympathy for working people in Republican ranks.<\/p>\n

But even so, it\u2019s a basis for organizing and education. It can be a step toward revitalizing the labor movement, a prime target of the neoliberal project since Reagan and Thatcher, who understood well that working people must be deprived of means to defend themselves from the assault.<\/p>\n

Decline of union membership is by now recognized, even in the mainstream, to be a major factor in rising inequality — a phrase that translates to \u201crobbery of the general public by a tiny fraction of super-rich.\u201d The Economic Policy Institute has reviewed the facts regularly, most recently in a chart that graphically demonstrates<\/a> the remarkable correlation between rising\/falling union membership and falling\/rising inequality.<\/p>\n

More generally, there is a good opportunity to overcome the baleful legacy of Trump\u2019s bitterly anti-labor Labor Department, headed by corporate lawyer Eugene Scalia, who used his term in office to eviscerate worker rights<\/a>, notoriously during the pandemic. Scalia was perfectly chosen for the transformation of the Republicans to a \u201cworking-class party,\u201d as hailed by Marco Rubio and Josh Hawley in a triumph of propaganda, or maybe sheer chutzpah.<\/p>\n