{"id":91590,"date":"2021-03-24T14:16:01","date_gmt":"2021-03-24T14:16:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/jacobinmag.com\/2021\/03\/middle-class-decline-capitalism-1-percent\/"},"modified":"2021-03-24T14:16:01","modified_gmt":"2021-03-24T14:16:01","slug":"the-left-must-appeal-to-a-middle-class-squeezed-by-capitalism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/radiofree.asia\/2021\/03\/24\/the-left-must-appeal-to-a-middle-class-squeezed-by-capitalism\/","title":{"rendered":"The Left Must Appeal to a Middle Class Squeezed by Capitalism"},"content":{"rendered":"\n \n\n\n\n

The middle classes of the Global North are losing their privileged status in the face of automation, casualization, and downward social mobility. Socialists must find ways to mobilize these hard-pressed middle-class layers in a struggle against today's financialized capitalism.<\/h3>\n\n\n
\n \n
\n Joseph Vavak, Realization<\/cite>, 1938. (Smithsonian American Art Museum, transfer from General Services Administration)\n <\/figcaption> \n<\/figure>\n\n\n\n\n \n

The surge in inequality since 1980 has been driven from above, by the top 10 percent, and even more so by the top 1 percent and the even smaller fractions of pharaonic wealth. The other 90 percent have not all been impoverished, but they have been abandoned. This has given rise to a bitter journalistic and academic literature in the Global North, an interesting counter-position to consultancy and development bank dreams of the \u201crising middle class\u201d<\/a> of the Global South.<\/p>\n

To stiffen bourgeois resolve in this moment of crisis and liberal self-doubt, Torben Iversen and David Soskice\u2019s Democracy and Prosperity<\/em> (2019) presents a homage to \u201cadvanced capitalist democracies\u201d (they show more deference to capitalism than to democracy, which is held responsible for the inequality). \u201cThe essence of democracy,\u201d they aver, is \u201cthe advancement of middle-class interests.\u201d<\/p>\n

Iversen and Soskice, both prominent institutional economists, argue that the middle class is aligned with capital via two key mechanisms. One is \u201cinclusion into the wealth stream\u201d created by capital accumulation. The other is the welfare state: the tax-and-transfer system ensures that the gains of the knowledge economy \u201care shared with the middle classes.\u201d It is precisely this \u201cinclusion\u201d and \u201csharing\u201d between capitalists and the middle class that is found by recent inequality research<\/a> to be terminating.<\/p>\n

In the beginning, the neoliberal dispensation did favor middle-class interests. The opening up of public services to private business provided some gains for lucky segments of the middle class. Public funding of free private education places, through a voucher system as in Sweden today, gave middle-class parents a welcome chance to send their children to well-kept schools with few immigrant or working-class children. Corporate care has been less popular, and prone to public scandals, but is still accepted by many as a familiar accompaniment to austerity and the scarcity of public provision.<\/p>\n

On the other hand, the exclusion of the middle class from prime urban housing continues apace, and income and wealth gaps are widening. Meanwhile, environmentalism is making ever-deeper inroads into the educated middle class, explicitly putting planetary survival and ecological sustainability above the interests of capital.<\/p>\n\n \n\n \n \n \n

Falling Behind<\/h2>\n \n

As the median is the exact middle of a distribution, the ratio between the incomes of the top 1 percent and the median is a good measure of the distance separating the upper from the middle class. In the United States, this ratio jumped from 11:1 to 26:1 in the years 1980\u20132016. In the UK and Sweden, it rose from a relatively low 3:1 to around 10:1. In Germany the ratio also climbed, whereas in France it fell slightly from an already high 11:1.<\/p>\n

Because of income polarization, the size of the middle-income class \u2014 those with incomes between 75 and 200 percent of the median \u2014 has shrunk in the OECD area, and opportunities for entering into it have narrowed. Upward mobility into tertiary education has stalled since 1975, while the risk of downward mobility increased substantially in the 2010s, most strongly in the UK.<\/p>\n

COVID-19 has continued, and in several countries accelerated, the rupture between the upper and middle class. In the United States, the wealth of billionaires increased by 44 percent<\/a>\u00a0from mid-March 2020 to late February 2021, at a time when 50 percent of people with a college or higher education were reporting difficulties<\/a> paying for usual household expenses. By the end of July 2020, the wealth of British billionaires had grown by 35 percent<\/a>\u00a0over the year before, while almost one in five employed middle-income earners reported a decrease<\/a> in savings, and half of them no change.<\/p>\n\n \n \n \n

Biden\u2019s Failure<\/h2>\n \n

Middle-class children are barred from an increasingly exclusive elite education system, spanning kindergartens to selective top universities, by the economically unmatchable investments upper-class parents are making in order to prepare their offspring for plum positions in the labor market.<\/p>\n