![](\"https:\/\/www.commondreams.org\/media-library\/dnc-chair-jaime-harrison-appears-at-the-committee-s-winter-meeting.jpg?id=32979330&width=1200&height=600&coordinates=0%2C0%2C0%2C812\"\/)
\n\tNevada Democratic Party Chair Judith Whitmer said Friday that progressives won't stop working to stem the flow of untraceable cash into national primary contests after the DNC Resolutions Committee blocked a vote on her proposed dark money ban for the second time<\/a>.\n<\/p> \n\tWhitmer, a DNC member, told Common Dreams<\/em> that \"time and time again, we've watched 'dark money' used to silence the voices our party most needs to hear.\"\n<\/p> \n\t\"Our party and our country need strong Democratic candidates willing to speak truth to power, but when their messages can be drowned out in a flood of untraceable expenditures, many candidates are questioning why they should even run,\" Whitmer said. \"Restoring faith in our democracy has never been more urgent, and that all-important work should start in our own primary elections.\"\n<\/p> \n\tWhitmer sponsored the proposed dark money ban alongside fellow DNC member James Zogby, who previously served as chair of the resolutions panel. If approved, the resolution would have prohibited dark money<\/a> donations in Democratic primary contests and established guidelines for investigating any violations of the ban. \n\tOn Thursday, members of the DNC Resolutions Committee\u2014who likely faced pressure from DNC leadership<\/a>\u2014stayed quiet<\/a> when the proposed ban was put up for consideration, so the measure did not receive a vote. Had the committee approved the proposal, which was backed by dozens of DNC members<\/a>, it would have gone to the full DNC for a vote this weekend. (The DNC doesn't publicize membership lists for its standing committees.)\n<\/p> \n\t\"Although we were disappointed that the Resolutions Committee once again chose not to move our resolution forward, we will keep fighting to make our primaries a fair and level playing field for all candidates,\" Whitmer told Common Dreams<\/em>.\n<\/p> \n\tDemocratic leaders, including President Joe Biden<\/a>, have repeatedly railed against the scourge of dark money, decried its corrupting influence, and pledged to rein it in\u2014only to balk at pressure for substantive action. \n\tThe party's platform<\/a>, adopted in 2020, states that \"we will bring an end to 'dark money' by requiring full disclosure of contributors to any group that advocates for or against candidates.\"\n<\/p> \n\tYet as the DNC leadership, headed by Chair Jaime Harrison, refuses to act on its rhetoric\u2014and as congressional Republicans block broader legislative efforts<\/a> to curtail dark money\u2014Democratic incumbents continue to benefit from untraceable donations, which are frequently used to undercut progressive challengers.\n<\/p> \n\tLast year, the newly formed<\/a> dark money group Opportunity for All Action Fund spent around $600,000<\/a> to bolster Reps. Donald Payne Jr. (D-N.J.), Dina Titus (D-Nev.), and Danny Davis (D\u2013Ill.).\n<\/p> \n\tAll three went on to defeat their progressive primary opponents and win reelection. That pattern played out across the country, though some candidates\u2014including Rep. Summer Lee (D-Pa.), who was aggressively targeted<\/a> by AIPAC's super PAC\u2014were able to overcome torrents of opposition spending<\/a> and prevail in November.\n<\/p> \n\t\"In races around the nation, we've seen these underhanded tactics used to silence debate on critical issues, with competing views buried under an avalanche of dark money-funded messaging.\"\n<\/p> \n\tAccording to an August 2022 study<\/a> by the Wesleyan Media Project, nearly 70% of pro-Democratic Senate ads up to that point in last year's election cycle were funded by groups that don't disclose any of their donors.\n<\/p> \n\t\"Letting our primaries devolve into auctions, rather than elections, has done more than simply create an unequal and unfair playing field,\" Whitmer said<\/a> during the DNC Resolutions Committee's last gathering in September. \"In races around the nation, we've seen these underhanded tactics used to silence debate on critical issues, with competing views buried under an avalanche of dark money-funded messaging.\"\n<\/p> \n\tAt this weekend's DNC meeting in Philadelphia, members approved a presidential primary calendar that would bump South Carolina up to the first-in-the-nation primary slot for 2024\u2014a plan that has drawn criticism from some progressives<\/a>.\n<\/p> \n\tBut the issue of dark money was brushed aside once again.\n<\/p> \"It was deeply upsetting that the Democratic Party refused to even vote on our resolution to ban 'dark money' from primaries,\" Zogby tweeted<\/a> Saturday. \"Using millions of 'dark money' from questionable billionaire sources to target and smear progressives is damaging to democracy and party unity.\"<\/p>