In a 20-page sentencing memorandum in the case of the United States v. Daniel Everette Hale published on July 19, federal prosecutors argue vindictively that the former Air Force analyst stole classified information in order to “ingratiate himself” with journalists and that a “significant sentence is necessary to demonstrate that the unauthorized disclosure of classified information is a serious crime with significant consequences.”
The post Drone War Whistleblower Daniel Hale Remains Steadfast As Federal Prosecutors Demand Nine-Year Sentence appeared first on PopularResistance.Org.
This post was originally published on PopularResistance.Org.