Stephen Duncombe and Silas Harrebye’s evidence-based, empirical study demonstrates the effectiveness of creative activism
The Copenhagen Experiment: testing the effectiveness of creative vs. conventional forms of activism
On a busy bridge in Copenhagen, Denmark, C4AA Co-Founder and Research Director Stephen Duncombe, along with Silas Harrebye, designed and staged a public experiment. They tested the comparative effect and affect of creative vs. more conventional forms of activism over a three day period.
[The study] found that a creative approach was more effective at delivering on awareness, engagement, and receptiveness
By analyzing differences and similarities on several levels including:
- attention
- thought
- feeling
- memory
- action
they found that a creative approach was more effective at delivering on awareness, engagement, and receptiveness than conventional means.
Another exciting result: people they interviewed and observed were more positive towards the creative interventions than more conventional ones. Follow-up surveys revealed that creative activism proved to be more memorable and result in more ensuing action on the issues.
The study is now published in the Social Movement Studies journal.
The study is behind a paywall but we have 50 free downloads available. If you’d like free access, reach out to let us know, and we can provide on a first-come, first-served basis.
The Center for Artistic Activism was founded on research and you can read more on our site.
The post New publication! Creative vs. conventional activism appeared first on The Center for Artistic Activism.
This post was originally published on News – The Center for Artistic Activism.
