Category: Business

  • Exclusive: Meetings while in Saudi Arabia undisclosed due to ‘administrative oversight’, says business department

    The chancellor, Kwasi Kwarteng, held undisclosed meetings with senior executives of Saudi Arabian firms when he was the business secretary, documents acquired by the Guardian show.

    The meetings occurred in January, when Kwarteng visited the kingdom for a two-day trip under his previous ministerial role.

    Continue reading…

  • Land Forces 2022, AMDA
    All’s not fair at the warfare Expo, where taxpayer-funded arms merchants hobnob with military types by invitation only. “Aggressive” journalists not allowed. Persona non grata Callum Foote reports on Land Forces 2022, Australia’s biggest War Fair.

    This post was originally published on Michael West.

  • ClubsNSW
    ClubsNSW is dragging a dying man through the courts, and media identity Friendly Jordies too, but its own house is hardly in order

    This post was originally published on Michael West.

  • Big Tech privacy
    Every time an advertiser pays Big Tech for an ad in your social media feed, your data is the selling point. The data you give them for free.

    This post was originally published on Michael West.

  • Sydney airport delays
    No matter what happens with customer discontent and employee unrest at Qantas, chief executive Alan Joyce can’t lose.

    This post was originally published on Michael West.

  • RNZ News

    By Colin Peacock, RNZ Mediawatch presenter

    There is mounting pressure on tech titans Google and Facebook to pay local news media to carry their news online.

    Google has already done deals with some for its News Showcase, but other big names in news are still trying to get the platforms to pay — and the government is hinting it could force the issue soon.

    “Are you putting the hard word on them to secure deals to pay for content? Are you going to legislate?” Newshub Nation host Simon Shepherd asked Willie Jackson last weekend, putting the hard word on the broadcasting and media minister.

    “Are you putting the hard word on them to secure deals to pay for content? Are you going to legislate?” Newshub Nation host Simon Shepherd asked Willie Jackson a week ago, putting the hard word on the broadcasting and media minister.

    “I’m trying really hard. I have said to them, [in] three months let’s see the deals in the marketplace,” the minister replied.

    For years local news media have griped about getting very little from the platforms distributing their stuff to huge audiences  — and profiting from it.

    The thing most likely to persuade the tech titans to pay local newsmakers is the likelihood of the government forcing the issue with legislation — and this was the first time that a government minister had set any kind of deadline publicly.

    ‘I want to see fairness’
    “I want to see some fairness. I want to see all these Kiwi news organisations looked after . . and these big players have the funding and the resourcing to be able to do that,” Willie Jackson told Newshub Nation.

    Some of the deals that have been done were revealed earlier this month when Google launched the local version of its News Showcase service, now available via Google’s websites and apps.

    The first Kiwi outlets ever to get regular payments from Google for that include The New Zealand Herald’s owner NZME and its subscriber subsidiary BusinessDesk, RNZ, online sites Scoop and Newsroom and the Pacific Media Network. There is also a handful of local outlets too like Crux, which serves the Southern Lakes region, and Kapiti News.

    “It’s part of our commitment to continuing to play a part in what we see as a very important shared responsibility to ensure the long term sustainability of public interest journalism in New Zealand,” Google’s local country representative Carolyn Rainsford told RNZ’s Gyles Beckford recently.

    Broadcasting Minister Willie Jackson described that as “a good start, but not enough” — while the Spinoff’s founder Duncan Grieve was also underwhelmed.

    He reckoned it was actually Willie Jackson that Google had in mind with the Showcase launch “to create a sense that Google is now a solid and public spirited ally to the news industry”.

    Deal "close" report on NZME and Google
    Deal “close” report on NZME and Google. Image: Mediawatch/RNZ

    For now, Google News Showcase is far from a comprehensive or compelling service for Kiwis. It offers nothing from our biggest national news producer Stuff or other big names in news like TVNZ and Newshub — or smaller outlets such Allied Press and The Spinoff.

    Bargaining collectively
    Several publishers — including Stuff — have banded together with the News Publishers Association to bargain collectively with Google and Meta (the parent company of Facebook).

    Earlier this year the Commerce Commission gave them permission to negotiate a deal for a 10-year period.

    So how’s that going?

    “We can’t comment much on the status, but we are engaging with the NPA,” was all Google’s regional head of partnerships Shilpa Jhunjhunwala would tell RNZ earlier this month.

    A recent report by the Judith Nielsen Institute estimate Google and Facebook paid Australian media companies about A$200m last year.


    Australia’s News Media Bargaining Code.  Video: Judith Neilson Institute
    How much might Google throw into our news media, willingly or not?

    “Unfortunately an interview won’t be possible,” Google New Zealand told Mediawatch last week (without explaining why).

    Instead they gave us a statement attributable to Caroline Rainsford, country director Google New Zealand:

    “We are proud of the launch of Google News Showcase and continuing our conversations with other local news media businesses.”

    “We can’t give you any kind of commercial numbers because they’re all commercial and in confidence,” Google’s regional head of partnerships Shilpa Jhunjhunwala told RNZ’s Gyles Beckford earlier this month.

    When pressed, she said Google’s global commitment to News Showcase was $1 billion over three years.

    “But beyond that, we’re not able to share anything specific to New Zealand,” she said.

    Why is there no deal with other New Zealand news publishers yet?

    ‘No serious offers on table’
    “Those negotiations are underway, but neither of those companies have put any serious offers on the table,” Stuff chief executive Sinead Boucher told Mediawatch.

    She said the Australian deals were their benchmark.

    “What we produce is very similar kind of content and we operate in very similar markets. We’d be looking for payments that equate to more like NZ$40 million to $50 million a year into the industry here,” she said.

    “I think the government and Minister Jackson have made clear that the government expect fair deals to be done — and that they are prepared to legislate in the near term to ensure that happens,” she said.

    “The only way to materially address this is to create an environment where we can negotiate fair commercial payment from these giant multinationals who have built their businesses entirely off content created by other people,” she said.

    “You could think of any search term and put it into Google and look down the results and see that a new story created by somebody is part of the results. What we are focused on negotiating a commercial payment for that content in the same way that you would for any other product,” she said.

    “If you invested in a car and someone started running it as a taxi, you would expect them to compensate you for that — not to build their own business without recognising your investment,” Boucher told Mediawatch.

    “Our problem is that these platforms are very reluctant to come to the table and have a fair negotiation. That’s why the sort of legislation has been needed in Australia and other countries and also here in New Zealand,” she said.

    The tale across the Tasman.

    Rod Sims
    ACCC regulator chair Rod Sims … called “the man who forced Google and Meta to pay for news.” Image: ACCC/RNZ

    The man who forced the platforms to pay up
    Rod Sims has been called “the man who forced Google and Meta to pay for news.”

    For more than a decade, he chaired the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) Australia’s competition regulator.

    “It was fraught at times, but we presented the report to government in mid-2019 and they accepted the recommendation to have a News Media Bargaining Code six months later. It was legislated in February 2021. That’s pretty quick in terms of policy development in Australia,” Sims told Mediawatch.

    “Google’s done a deal with essentially all media businesses. Meta has only done a deal with media businesses which that employ 85 percent of (Australia’s) journalists. It’s crucial that . . . it’s widely shared and you need legislation so that everybody has the ability to bargain.

    “I know for a fact that the payments were well in excess of A$200 million — so NZ $40 million to $50 million sounds absolutely the right number to be spread across all media,” he said.

    “Google and Meta were required to bargain with all eligible media businesses — and if they could not reach agreement, then arbitration would come into place. The threat of that evened up the bargaining power,” he said.

    “The second component was that if Google and Meta did a deal with one media player, then they were required under law to do a deal with all media players. So their choice was either have no media content on their platform, or do deals,” he said.

    “They chose to do deals with media companies because there’s value to them,” he said.

    Arbitration threat needed
    “I’m a bit concerned that in New Zealand you don’t have arbitration at the end of the negotiation period negotiations fail,” he said.

    A Google officer once told me struggling news media pleading for “compensation” were like redundant drivers of horse-drawn carriages and rickshaws expecting today’s taxi drivers to pay them.

    “No, that’s completely wrong. This is not like the car taking the place of the horse and carriage or smartphones taking the place of Kodak film because Google and Facebook don’t produce any journalism. So they haven’t taken the place of media, because they’re just not in the media business,” Rod Sims told Mediawatch.

    “For Google to be a good search engine, it needs to bring in media into its search just about every time. But they don’t need any particular media company. So only by the News Media Bargaining Code could you even up the bargaining power,” he said.

    “Unless we get payment for media that’s being taken and used for free, we’ll have a lot less media and less media harms society,” he said.

    “It’s not up to me to tell the New Zealand government what to do, but my advice would be to pass the Australian News Media Bargaining Code,” he said.

    This article is republished under a community partnership agreement with RNZ.

  • FM expressed concerns over an issue of payment of dues to micro, small, and medium enterprises and asked big corporates to clear their dues

    This post was originally published on The Asian Age | Home.

  • Online privacy myth
    Big tech wants us to think we control our own data, but we don’t. Our relationship with technology begins with deceptions and lies.

    This post was originally published on Michael West.

  • Some of the readers of The Creative Independent might not be familiar with the techniques you use to create garments and objects. I was hoping you could start by telling me a bit about the things you make and how you make them.

    It is kind of a complicated process with many steps. But basically, I mix a viscous water solution that I’m able to float paint on top of. Then I mix all of my paints to lighten them a little bit and help with their spreadability. Then I take that paint and I apply it to the surface of this buoyant liquid. Then I manipulate the paint to create patterns and imagery. Then I can take paper or wood or fabric, and lay it on top of the surface of the water and it transfers onto whatever material I’m printing. I take that material and turn it into all sorts of products and designs and artworks, from wearable clothing to home goods to prints on paper. My whole practice, pretty much, is rooted in that certain technique.

    How did you arrive at that method?

    I originally studied sculpture, but I’ve always made my own clothing and I’ve always manipulated clothes and done tie-dyeing or applique or…

    Are you self-taught with sewing?

    Totally self-taught, but I’ve always been really into clothing as a form of self-expression, and cutting things up from the thrift store and putting things back together. I was on this deep exploration of textile techniques and I tried marbling, I just fell in love with it. Because it’s so fluid and you don’t have that much control. So, it feels like this really nice push and pull of you manipulating it, and it sort of pushing back. It’s very freeing in that way.

    I think I’d been looking for a technique that was freeing for me, because I was always living in these tiny, tricky little spaces and making work that felt really constricted and small, like tiny drawings. To be able to feel really open and expressive with the material that I couldn’t control too much was this ‘aha!’ moment for me.

    What parts of your upbringing or your early adulthood do you think were key in preparing you to do the things you’re doing now?

    This is a funny question, because I had a pretty intense upbringing and have an extremely high level of endurance because of it. So, I think that has helped me be very committed and really work hard. Also, not having a lot of support or money or anything. It’s like, “I am doing this and no one else is going to do this for me, so I have to just make this work on my own.”

    But I also grew up with creative parents and we lived completely off the grid in rural Maine and we would just make everything. My parents’ approach to life was like, “We can make whatever we need.” They didn’t want to rely on anyone or anything. So, there was no electricity, no running water, build your own shelter, grow your own food, make your own clothes, that kind of mentality. I think that also has its pros and cons. But being raised with the idea that you can make something from nothing, and you can make something beautiful out of something hard or ugly or raw, is something that just continues to inspire me. It keeps me going to this day and I’m very grateful for that part of my childhood, for sure.

    In terms of running your business and making the work that you make, what are some of the things you feel like you’ve had to unlearn from whatever you were taught in school or from family?

    I think, connecting to what I just said, [the idea that] you can do anything. Unlearning that and actually asking for help with things that don’t come naturally to you has been something I’ve really struggled with. I’m getting so much better at reaching out and saying, “Actually, this would be more efficient if I reach out to someone who’s really good at this and ask for help and bring them in.” That has been a pivotal change in my practice.

    Would you mind giving a specific example of a time you’ve done that?

    I had my friend Jackie come in and help organize my studio, because I am extremely messy and disorganized. She loves organizing spaces and is so thoughtful and enjoys that. That was absolutely a game-changer. I had my friend Ariel help me—she just got a master’s in graphic design and helped me with website rebranding stuff. I am very analog, I’ll be there getting so frustrated and irritated. Then I’m like, “This doesn’t need to be what I’m putting energy into.” She needed the work and is really good at it. Then I just had all that space in my mind free up for other work. Even having my friend Perry who works with me part-time, having her come in and help me do shipping and stuff. I don’t need to be doing everything.

    Reminding yourself that things can get done if you don’t touch every single thing.

    Yes. And it’s okay. And it doesn’t mean that I’m incapable or whatever. The myth of the one woman show, that’s based in ego and it’s unrealistic. I think growing up being so endurant and doing so much on my own made me feel like that was part of my identity. Then, as an artist and a business owner, wanting to uphold that in some way, because that’s how I felt proud, and needing to really shift that narrative, because it was actually stopping me from growing.

    What does success look like to you now?

    This is a question I ask myself a lot, actually, because I’ve grown up with this narrative that I’m going to be the one to make it. One of the first people to go to school in my family or have a career that’s actually with my creative work. This idea of “making it” is just so abstract. Have I made it because I have my own studio? And I’m selling work and I’m making a living just on my work, is that making it? Or can you ever make it, really? I don’t know. It’s just like, what is success really? For me, I think it’s being happy and fulfilled, and it’s not about money or space or acknowledgement. So, I think my goal when I will feel successful is when I’ve tamed my mind to a point where I’m not being bogged down with other little mental distractions or where I feel secure in myself.

    Something that I think we maybe have in common to some degree is from existing in kind of a chaotic environment in early life, we’re maybe too comfortable with chaos sometimes. But I think it’s really interesting to talk about chaos and control in how it relates to creative work. I wonder if you could share a little bit of your thoughts on the utility of chaos or the pitfalls of it.

    Yeah. My process is extremely messy and I get paint on everything and water all over the floor. I love being able to create in a space of chaos, because I think it has energy and electricity and there’s no part of your brain that’s like, ‘Oh, careful!’ You’re just going for it and you’re able to get in the flow and let go. That’s when I make my best work, when I access the flow, which is my favorite state of being.

    It’s like a form of surrender.

    Completely. I mean, it’s kind of like a disassociation also. It’s like therapy. You’re floating and it’s just pouring through you and you’re not overthinking it. I think it really helps me to be in a chaotic, messy environment, because I’m not worried about anything. It’s okay to get super messy.

    Do you have any rules that you’ve made for yourself as a creative person or as a business owner?

    Yes. In the last year and a half, I have been really trying to be disciplined and have a good work-life balance, because I’m a total night owl and I would be coming to the studio and I would forget to eat, I would forget to drink water, I would be here till 3:00 AM. I wasn’t making time for anything else in my life. So consumed by my work, to the point of severe burnout, which is super real. I went through that and it was really hard to bounce back from and I never want to go there again.

    Now I try to do nine to five, and I try not to work weekends and I try to always have snacks here. Getting my dog, Wanda, has been really helpful, because she reminds me to take breaks and go for walks. My boyfriend is like, ‘I’m picking you up at 5:00 and you’re coming home with me. You can go out, do whatever, see your friends, whatever, but you’re done at 5:00.’

    When you are working how do you approach structuring your time?

    I try to get here early and have some quiet time to look at books or write ideas down, and get myself centered and organized, so I’m coming into the day with calm energy instead of feeling frantic. I often feel like I never have enough time. Trying to create a calm start to the day, where I’m not entering the work in frantic energy has been helpful.

    But I still work in a very abstract way and I still jump from one thing to the next. I am trying to have more of a structured day, where I have a task and I try to complete it and not get too distracted. I hide my phone when I come to the studio. I put it somewhere that I can’t reach, take my ladder and put it up there [points to a high shelf] and then move the ladder. Because I do not want to waste my time. If I’m only here from nine to five, I need to make the most of this day. I can’t spend an hour on Instagram.

    So, part of work-life balance is being very protective of your work time.

    That is so true. I am so protective. I am like a mother lion when it comes to my studio practice, extremely protective. That can be tricky with friendships or wanting to go visit super old friends. But I really do think that I am where I’m at now because I’ve been so committed and I’ve been prioritizing my work above anything else really in my life. I think it pays off when you really commit.

    Can you talk about some of your priorities as a business owner, or some of the challenges you’ve had in how to structure this as a viable business?

    As someone that studied fine art and conceptual sculpture, and then wanted to make a living off my creative work for a long time, I felt guilt and shame around making functional objects, because it wasn’t living in the fine art world. It took me a long time to let go of these rules of what deserves this sort of a claim and what doesn’t.

    I think the more potential I saw in creating a living for myself with my work, and the more joy that I saw people having by being able to wear my work, those divisions started fading away more. But that has definitely been something I used to struggle with and a boundary that I still want to work on smudging out. I want these things to be able to coexist and I’m really excited that I’m making more work that lives on a wall. That feels exciting to me. I would love to have a show of my prints, but I’m also excited by having wearables coexist in that space.

    This is something that I think a lot of small businesses toeing the line of art and design are confronted by, because there’s such a division still between those spaces. But it’s exciting to be existing on the edge of both. I feel like I’m inspired by the potential that can come out of merging them.

    Can we talk a little bit about the way you use color and what sort of feelings you hope people have when they wear or experience the things you make?

    It’s funny because I feel like I’ve been saying for a number of years now, “I’m going to do a tan and ochre collection.” I really want to try that and I just can’t. I am just obsessed and in love with color, I love all color. It makes me feel excited and happy. I love combining tons of colors. It feels energetic and alive. I think if there’s one thing I’m trying to bring is fun and confidence, because they’re really bold and bright, the things that I make.

    There’s also a childlike sort of thing going on, because they’re like how a child would just throw every color on the page. I love that feeling of being really free with it. I think that there’s just energy that happens with bright colors and colors mixing. There’s that kind of optical illusion that happens with certain colors and you put them next to each other. And also nature is full of neon color. I want to draw from the extreme and extroverted and eccentric parts of nature that are just like, “What is this crazy frog that is covered in neon dots or this wild flower that’s blooming out of a cactus.” That’s the feeling that I’m trying to evoke.

    Yeah, my suspicion is that you make a lot of people really happy when they wear your stuff, because how can you be a grouch and wear a smiley face with heart cheeks in ten shades of neon?

    Even when I’m approaching a trickier emotion, with the mixed emotion faces that I do, I’m injecting humor into it, because it’s done with super bright colors and it gets goofy. I think that feels really therapeutic to me. It’s like you can be sad, but there’s still this feeling of joy lurking within it. Or saying it’s okay to have these feelings, but also here’s something that’s going to make you feel happy.

    What advice would you give to other artists on how to have more joy in their lives?

    I think I would say, make a list of things that make you happy and prioritize those. Try to make time to prioritize them. If you feel nourished by going into nature, try to make time to do that once a week or once a month. And be kind to yourself. And find time to play. And nourish your inner creative child, because I think that’s where the source is for all of us. If that child is being neglected, then it’s harder to access joy. So, play.

    Maisie Broome Recommends:

    Adopting a pet (I found Wanda through True North Rescue, they bring animals up from Texas)

    Digging for gems at Record Archive in Rochester, NY. One of the largest used record stores in the country.

    Remote camping at Putnam Pond (rent a canoe and paddle to island campsites, pack light)

    Always go for a swim when you get the chance, no matter how chilly it is.

    Invest in systems that help organize your practice, from studio space or flat files to asking for help. Whatever you can do to make accessing your creative flow easier is always worth the investment.

    This post was originally published on The Creative Independent.

  • Fox lies democracy dies
    If he gets in the witness box, Lachlan Murdoch stands to win his defamation action against Crikey but the Australian news site is already triumphant. This thing is global and the money and subscriber support is rolling in.

    This post was originally published on Michael West.

  • Qantas A380
    Qantas international flights may become even more expensive as Airbus has issued a global directive concerning A380 wing cracks. Even “wet-leasing” aircraft is now being considered. Michael Sainsbury with this exclusive investigation.

    This post was originally published on Michael West.

  • The revenues for the month of August 2022, registered 28 per cent increase than the GST revenues of Rs 1,12,020 crore collected in Aug 2021

  • The beach-side mansion sits in the northern part of Palm Jumeirah and has 10 bedrooms, a private spa, and indoor and outdoor pools

    This post was originally published on The Asian Age | Home.

  • Prolonged bending to gather tea for James Finlay Kenya is argued to accelerate ageing of pickers’ backs by up to 20 years

    More than a 1,000 Kenyan tea pickers who say that harsh and exploitative working conditions on a Scottish-run tea farm have caused them crippling health complaints can now pursue their class action in an Edinburgh court.

    Lawyers acting for the tea pickers have won an order from the court of session, Scotland’s highest civil court, telling James Finlay Kenya Ltd (JFK) to abandon attempts to block the suit through the Kenyan courts.

    Continue reading…

  • Lachlan Murdoch

    On one side, a small Australian media player. On the other, the world’s most powerful media moguls. Independent news outlet Crikey has just taken its fight with Lachlan Murdoch public

  • Bunge and Cargill, behind more than 30% of soy exports to EU and UK, accused of exposing suppliers to link with indigenous rights violations

    Two of the world’s biggest grain traders are sourcing soy from a Brazilian farm linked to abuses of indigenous rights and land, a report from the environmental group Earthsight claims

    Earthsight named the companies as Bunge and Cargill and said they sourced soy produced on a farm located on ancestral land of the Kaiowá indigenous group.

    Continue reading…

    This post was originally published on Human rights | The Guardian.

  • HAL had submitted a proposal to the Malaysian defence ministry in October of 2021 for supply of 18 FLIT LCAs

    This post was originally published on The Asian Age | Home.

  • The sector-specific associations, industry bodies CII and FICCI and representatives from IIT Delhi and IIT BHU will be part of the meeting

    This post was originally published on The Asian Age | Home.

  • Your work seems very place-specific to me, because it involves harvesting and foraging plants from your home. Can you begin by describing this place, painting a picture of where your work gets made?

    Loney Abrams: Sure. It’s changed a lot throughout our practice. Wretched Flowers began when we were living in Brooklyn, so the whole inspiration for it was through going for walks around our studio, which was in East New York. Walking around and noticing how much biodiversity was literally growing through the cracks of the sidewalk, that’s where it really started. But we moved from New York to Connecticut in March 2020. Now, where we work is completely different. What used to be an exhilarating, if not also illegal experience (foraging) in New York, whereas here, there’s no risk at all. It’s only ever very peaceful, very tranquil, almost meditative.

    Johnny Stanish: Well, the risk now is we’re getting into more poisonous situations – different risks. Poison ivy, ticks, it’s become a different thing that we have to look out for with foraging.

    Loney: So we’re just deep, thick in brush. There’s one place in particular that is mostly a hunting area. It’s called a Multiple Use Area, which basically just means hunters can go there. But they periodically mow down this meadow, which makes it prime grassland for wildlife. It’s just tons of wildflowers, tons of everything that we’re interested in. So we’ll go there. And it’s very beautiful. We bring our dog. She runs around.

    Johnny: It’s almost like if you could picture Duck Hunter on Nintendo, where there’s the fields and the birds fly out. It’s sort of like that.

    Working as a team, are there specific roles that each of you take on in the project or is there a lot of overlap? Can you tell me a bit about how your collaborative process works?

    Johnny: Yeah. So it took us a little while because collaboration is a very learned experience. It isn’t something that’s easy just to jump into. It took us years to figure out our visual language. But once we did figure it out, we always recommend, when you’re doing a collaboration, lay out what you’re not good at and lay out what you are good at. And then use that collaboration to pull from everyone’s strengths. And so, Loney does a lot more of the deep dive research-based, more of the writing on our Instagram, and I take over the production side of things and maybe think about creating new objects or things like that. And then we meet in the middle and just rip it out.

    Loney: Yeah, all the ideas, like all the planning and conceptualizing is a conversation, and then, [Johnny is] in the studio more. I’m more foraging and writing, but there is a lot of overlap.

    Are you a couple?

    Loney: Yeah, we’re married.

    Do you have advice for collaborating with your romantic partner or your spouse?

    Johnny: I think one of the important things that we’ve learned is that it’s important to take the time not always collaborating and not always making art and just maybe work on our own separate endeavors that aren’t collaborative, that just are maybe for our mental health or something like that.

    Loney: That’s a really good one. I think it’s really easy when you’re working together and living together and creating together, your identities become dangerously close together. And so, having another creative outlet that is completely independent, like we both make music completely independently just for ourselves, not for anybody else. Having things that are completely separate is crucial so that you can still go back to your own creative self and find some difference at some point.

    Are there any specific ways that you think working on Wretched Flowers has changed you as a person, like your sense of self or identity?

    Johnny: I think one thing that it’s made me personally do is stop caring about the art world as much. It’s made me be able to walk out the back door of the art world and just leave it behind and just focus on Wretched and focus on making things that are more accessible for everyone to participate in, and look at making art in a whole different way than we were before.

    Did both of you have a strong sense of native plants before starting to do Wretched flowers?

    Loney: No.

    Because I would imagine it would change your way of looking at space if you develop this acuity toward foraging.

    Johnny: Yeah, we almost literally tripped over a watermelon growing in a parking lot in Brooklyn. And it was one of those things that opened our eyes up to be like, ‘Oh shit, there’s way more interesting things that are just happening around us. And we’re so focused just being in this studio, concentrating on one thing, that we just forgot that both of us love nature.’ I grew up on a ranch in Montana and [Loney] grew up going to farms and just loving that kind of thing. I hate to say, we tripped and fell and we’re like, ‘oh, whoa, what the hell we’ve been doing just thinking about these stupid objects when plants are just so interesting and so cool?’ We could never make something as interesting as that. So why not collaborate with nature instead of trying to push it away from us?’

    Loney: Yeah, there’s something called plant blindness, which is basically, we evolved to be able to scan our horizon really quickly and isolate moments of danger, like if there’s a lion running at us to eat us or whatever it is, our brains evolved to quickly gloss over plants. And so, it’s very easy to just look at the landscape and just be like, ‘oh, plants.’

    Johnny: Just blur.

    Loney: But I think once we started this project and started foraging and just going out and starting to identify different plants, an entire new world opened up to us because that blindness started to disappear. And we were able to really see our environment made up of many, many layers of species living together. Being able to see ecological systems has been really beneficial, not just in having a richer experience of our physical environment. But also, in learning ecology, you also learn how to see society as part of that ecology and understand that everything is a system, everything operates within a structure. There are no single individual bad apples, or good apples that are creating change. It’s communities, whether it’s communities of Queen Anne’s Lace that are competing with chicory that are collaborating with-

    Johnny: –what’s going on underground.

    Loney: –with mycelium under the soil versus whether it’s–

    Johnny: -an invasive rosebush trying to take over.

    Loney: So I think just having that perspective of, we are part of ecology, we are collaborators with our own environment, and taking that into our foraging practice too, and saying, ‘okay, it’s not just about cutting flowers and taking things home.

    Johnny: –take, take, take.

    Loney: It’s about looking at this community of species: how are we actors within this living community of plants and animals, and how do our actions contribute to their wellbeing or not? More specifically, we’ll often target invasive species before they go to seed so that their removal actually helps their little ecosystem, or we’ll harvest native beneficial plants after they’ve reproduced and gone to seed so that we’re not inhibiting their spread, things like that.

    Do you both believe in plant sentience?

    Loney: I think a trap that a lot of people fall into is trying to anthropomorphize other species. When we think of intelligence, we think of our own intelligence and we try to look for clues in other species to be like, ‘that looks like us. Therefore, it’s intelligent.’

    Johnny: [Plants have] a different type of intelligence that we don’t really understand.

    Loney: Since we moved here, we went from having the norm of a 9 to 5 kind of work schedule, weekends mean Saturday/Sunday, seven days in a week. And now we’re on a different kind of time scale that depends much more on weather, much more on what the plants are doing, and what the deer are doing and what all of these other species are doing, where they are in their life cycles, where they are in the season, what’s happening with the weather. And that structures our daily activities.

    And so, in that way, there is always a give and take. It’s not a communication where I’m like, ‘Hey, little plant. How was your night last night? Did you get a good night’s rest?’ It’s more like, ‘Oh, okay, you’re now at this stage of growth. This is what you might need from me.’ It’s more of that kind of conversation, but I do think that plants are able to have their own ways of feeling and thinking and understanding and knowing.

    Johnny: It’s just different.

    Loney: Yeah, it’s just different than we can know. And so, I think they can be sentient. It’s just, we need a new vocabulary for it, I think.

    What are some of the challenges of having a project like this that exists in a lot of different worlds – because you’re in the art world, doing installations, but then you’re in event design and weddings and you’re also selling commercial objects. How is it to run a business that’s navigating all these different spheres?

    Loney: Honestly, it makes no sense in business terms. I think what we’re realizing is that the business was an art experiment to start with, to see if we could just do what we were doing as artists, but find a new model where we weren’t relying on galleries and very wealthy collectors as our only way of supporting ourselves, which also limited who are audience and participants and collectors could be. So we wanted to expand it and make it much more accessible to people.. But I understand now why businesses are so niche. They only sell razors, right? They’re just really good at making razor blades. But for us, first and foremost, we’re artists. And not only are we artists, we’re artists that get kind of bored easily if we’re doing the same thing over and over. So for us, it’s just necessary that we have all of these different projects and directions because it’s what keeps us excited and what keeps us having fresh ideas. But not every aspect is making money –

    Johnny: –financially responsible.

    Loney: Yeah. It’s not really just a straightforward business in the sense that every action we take is towards the end of making profit. It’s very far from that. But at the same time, I think it’s helpful for us to talk about it as a business and also to destigmatize art being a business, because realistically, any artist that’s trying to be an artist is a business. And I almost feel like it’s taboo to talk about that sometimes or artists are looked down on for being–

    Johnny: Business people.

    But it also seems like there are some ways that you have an anticapitalist ethos baked into the project. I’m curious about the ethics of choosing to work with foraged materials and plant materials, it seems clear that’s part of it when you talk about accessibility.

    Johnny: Yeah. And I think also, the reason Wretched hasn’t grown into a bigger capitalist business is, we want to make sure that our ethics are correct when we are hiring people to help us, they’re getting paid reasonably and all those things. It’s tricky.

    Loney: Foraging allows us to not participate in the conventional flower industry, which is big agriculture. It’s similar to our food. I think a lot of people already understand the benefits of organic produce versus conventional, or locally grown produce versus grown overseas, or small farms versus big Ag, things like that. So our way of sort of not participating in that and making sure that all of the plant material is hyper local, is seasonal, is grown without pesticides, and is sustainably harvested, is by foraging. Being really intentional with what we forage, not only with which species do we forage, but what part of their life cycles do we forage them in? And something that we appreciate too about foraging is it’s not scalable in the sense that agriculture is. You cannot become a huge company when you’re relying on foraging. You have to stay within the balance that your environment allows.

    Johnny: And that’s an anticapitalist approach. It’s not being, ‘I’m going to just suck all these resources and make as much money as possible.’

    Loney: We’re seeing what is available to us and making the best out of that, and not searching for anything outside those limitations.

    What’s a bit of advice that you wish you could tell your younger self?

    Johnny: Art isn’t that important. It’s not changing the world.

    Loney: Yeah. I would tell myself to really pursue my interests, even if I didn’t think they fit in with the kind of story I was telling about myself. I always thought of myself as an artsy person, but I majored in sociology and environmental science in undergrad and felt like that was at odds with the lifestyle that I wanted for myself. And so, I kind of pursued my life as an artist and then, only much later on, realized that I could combine all of these interests into art.

    I think a lot of people when they’re starting off as artists, they only really think of more of the formal aspects of making art. Any interest that you have, even if it’s binge watching reality TV, that can become fodder for a really interesting art practice if you allow yourself to fully get nerdy about why you’re interested in the things you’re interested in and how to use your art to make those things interesting to other people.

    And then also, I think with what Johnny was saying is, art’s not that important. So many artists have an impulse to make art because they’re creative and they want to create. And your next step is, oh, then I want to be a professional artist in the art world, without fully understanding what the art world is. Most people finally get to the realization that the art world is, in a lot of ways, very toxic, very unjust, not conducive to actual creativity fundamentally. And then, it’s almost too late. You’re in too deep. So I don’t know how to turn that into advice exactly other than to say, just because you like making art and are creative, there may be ways to utilize that creativity that doesn’t involve entering the art world.

    Wretched Flowers Recommend:

    Castles of Clay” (1978) documentary by directed Joan and Alan Root and narrated by Orson Welles.

    The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins (2015) book by Anna Tsing

    Sinkhole Compilation video on Youtube

    Medieval Herbal Manuscripts

    “The Private Life of Plants” (1995) BBC tv show by David Attenborough

    This post was originally published on The Creative Independent.

  • Musk sold some 7.9 million shares between August 5 and 9 according to filings published on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website

  • You’re an actor, a director, and a producer. How did the transition between different roles happen? Was it a smooth transition or did you become a filmmaker or a producer because you felt that there was something missing in the projects you were working on as an actor?

    It’s a little of everything. When I was eight years old, my dad took me to a film set where his friend was working with Walter Matthau, and I just knew that’s what I wanted to do for the rest of my life. I didn’t know what that meant, but as a young woman, it kind of only meant being an actress at that time. So, I assumed that I wanted to be an actress, so I took acting classes and did plays.

    In high school, I wrote, directed and starred in a play. Then, I went to a college to study acting. While I was there, I was also directing and writing. I remember the staff asking me to pick one position. There were a couple of guys that were actor/director combined, or writer/director combined, but they didn’t have to pick one. So, I essentially was like, “No, I’m not picking one. I’ll get enough credits to do everything, even if it has to be more than the guys that they’re dual majors were different.”

    After graduating I moved to LA, I was acting in a bunch of stuff that, while the parts might be good, I didn’t think the material was necessarily great. So, I decided I wanted to produce material that was good and maybe act in some of the smaller roles. Then I found this niche of producing because I have an organized personality. I also got pregnant, so that was what you could do if you still wanted to make movies. That’s how I became a producer.

    About directing, I guess I always was directing beforehand, but I didn’t really realize it until I did my first documentary, which was called Greenlit, but it was supposed to just be a little behind the scenes video. I had been doing the EPKs myself to save money. I was doing an EPK in the behind the scenes video of greening of the film The River Why. It was so disastrous that it was hilarious and was its own movie. I submitted it to SXSW and it got in and premiered there. When you’re a director premiering a movie, as opposed to a producer, you get treated a lot better. I decided that directing was something I was going to focus on because I like being treated better than just basically an assistant/babysitter as a producer.

    You have worked with so many films as a producer. You were the executive producer for Noah Baumbach’s, The Squid and the Whale. You worked with Marielle Heller’s The Diary of a Teenage Girl, and also with Swiss Army Man. These films are all really different from one another. What motivates you to get involved with a project? How do you choose the projects you want to work with?

    It’s interesting because it is the filmmakers. There’s also James Gunn’s Super before he went on to Guardians of the Galaxy. As I look back now almost all of the directors that were not my business partner for a long time, those people went on to become really great directors on their own. The projects were picked because they had their own unique voice. I really admire that. You can really feel that when you read something fresh, or you meet someone in the room, you can really tell if they’re going to be able to bring it to the table. That was a skill that I had to hone. I had it there when I did The Squid and the Whale, but I was still young. I was still a girl at a time where I didn’t trust my own decisions. By the time I did Super, I was starting to trust my own decisions. When I did The Diary of a Teenage Girl, I realized that I should just trust myself and go with the movies that I like.

    What do you think helped you to trust more in yourself and follow your gut and your experience?

    I think, inherently, it’s growing up and aging. There’s that, but also, as women, we always used to try to over-prepare and always want to listen to the voice of the man who is producing with us. Whether it was a partner that I had or whoever. It’s like, “Oh well, they must know more than me because I’ve been taught in society that they do.”

    It really took The Diary of a Teenage Girl for me to remember and realize that I don’t need a man, and that I can make my own decisions, and that they can be good decisions. I think that’s about something like hitting your late thirties and then into your forties where you come into your own as a person, as a woman anyway. Over the last three years or four years, in particular, I felt not so alone as more and more women are helping and supporting each other. I know that not everyone was like that, it wasn’t a normal thing, and I think it’s getting more normal now. We’re now able to team up, which I like because that’s more of the kind of person I’ve always been.

    In this business it’s so important to build relationships and have a community and, again, being able to build a team, as you said. Did you have a mentor that helped you navigate the industry?

    No, I had the opposite. I had pushback from anyone I asked for help. That’s why I made a promise to myself that I would always encourage and help as many women as I could, and I would always share my contacts, and my relationships, and my agents, and my managers because I found the people that hoarded them or were afraid to lose them weren’t the kind of people I want to be.

    Why do you think people did not help you? Is this like a sense of competition, or that there are not so many opportunities?

    Yes, it is, but I think that we’ve evolved, maybe even as a society. We’re moving, not to get all woo-woo, but we’re moving into a different age now. I think it was a survivalist mentality, and if you’re an actor, which I was for the beginning, there’s only one job for the 40 actors that are in the room. No one wants to add their friends to their agents’ list of competitions. I don’t have that problem. I refer people to my agents all the time. I know that I’m unique, and I know that everyone else is unique, but not everyone knows that about themselves.

    It seems that you had to find your own voice that makes you unique, but also you had to work within the industry guidelines.

    Yeah. For example, Shonda Rhimes had a huge influence on my life. Before her work, actors, especially women, had to fit into a mold, a specific mold of a type. We were not allowed to be ourselves. We were not allowed to be individuals bringing our own personality to the characters. We had to fit into whatever these small-minded mindsets of what women were allowed to be were.

    Then, Shonda came in and she just broke through, and allowed actors and actresses particularly, of all races and sizes and ages to come in and have meaningful dramatic roles with character arcs. She, in my opinion, completely changed the way I think actors can realize their own uniqueness as an asset as opposed to, “Oh, I got to get skinnier, or I got to stay younger, or I got to be blonder, or I got to be taller,” or whatever.

    You created a website called the CherryPicks, which highlights film reviews and original stories from female-identifying and non-binary writers. This project started before Me Too, Time’s Up, and the Harvey Weinstein stories broke. This conversation about the importance of representation in front and behind the camera was already happening.

    Yes, those conversations were happening, but you were not able to really get much movement on it because, at the end of the day, the consumer who buys the tickets is the one who drives the market. If the consumer is listening to critics, then whatever the critics say they should spend their money on is what the studios are going to make. If the critics are overwhelmingly Caucasian males, then you can bet we’re going to be seeing a lot more films like Ford v Ferrari. That said, I love Ford v Ferrari, don’t get me wrong. But we’re going to be seeing a lot more of films like Top Gun and not too many films like The Farewell. I just had this realization that in order for real change to happen, then the consumers have to buy it. In order for them to buy it, then they have to be told that it’s worth their money and that we have to open up those gatekeepers, which are the critics, and have more women and more people of color, and particularly more women of color being critics.

    I noticed the guidelines at the time to be a critic and add up to the score of Rotten Tomatoes were very narrow. Most of the time, women or people of color, and particularly women of color, were not able to get those jobs at The New York Times or The LA Times and stuff like that. Also, the number of years they were required to have been writing for, some published in a professional paper, and they hadn’t opened up to blogs yet or more online publications. They hadn’t adapted themselves yet. So, I decided to start the CherryPicks to open up those guidelines for women and women of color and start adding in more online stuff.

    In these past few weeks, as a producer, where I’ve had a couple of productions that I was working on shutdown so we’ve been able to have these great Instagram live interviews on our CherryPicks account. We’re having actors or actresses giving us their favorite quarantine movies. It’s really growing at a pace that’s a bit overwhelming, but it’s a lot of fun, I have to say, working with a bunch of ladies and writing content and working with female writers and women of color, to write stories about the entertainment business. It’s really quite fun.

    What do you think are some obstacles that get in the way of creativity or being creative?

    Oh, that’s easy. Fear. I think we have natural instincts of being afraid of rejection. I recommend that it’s okay. See the fear, allow it to happen, but do not let it stop you because you have to be willing to fail and you have to be willing to suck and you have to be willing to take chances. In order to survive the obstacles and grow as a creative person, you have to be able to be okay that nothing is perfect because nothing is ever as good as it can be. Just let it go and make it. Everyone has an idea, but it’s the people who execute the ideas that grow and get the rewards.

    Have you ever abandoned a project? Is it okay to walk away from a situation or a project you’re not comfortable with?

    Of course, but just don’t do it because you’re too afraid. I’ve found that the projects that I’ve walked away from are related to the other personalities involved. Life is too short to work with people who are disrespectful or narcissistic.

    Now that everybody’s staying and working from home, have you been able to set some boundaries?

    I can’t. It’s impossible for me. I’m working, because being a mom is work as well, and being a wife is also work, so I’m always working, but I am enjoying the time I’m spending with my family. Just the fact that I get to sit here with one of my cats and see my kids going up and down. I have to say, me being at home since I normally travel so much, has just been lovely.

    Miranda Bailey Recommends:

    I got this new exercise thing called The Chirp, which is this little tiny like circle that you can roll your back out on. I found that, since I’m hunched over on my computer a lot, my back has been sore, and so I’ve been rolling it out on this thing called the Chirp and It’s very helpful.

    I’m rewatching Mad Men from the beginning, and I have to say it’s definitely different from the new Me Too movement point of view.

    Signing up for the CherryPicks newsletter because every Friday we send out a newsletter with what to see and what to skip that’s streaming, and also our live IG events that we’re having with lots of great TV stars right now.

    This post was originally published on The Creative Independent.

  • The government is also approving sovereign guarantee bond issuance for the cash-crunched BSNL to repay its bank loans

  • The rupee opened on a weaker note on Tuesday morning weighed down by outflows and high oil prices

    This post was originally published on The Asian Age | Home.

  • For a time, all your label’s releases shared a general visual template. It created a uniformity. That classic Sacred Bones triangle and ouroboros haven’t been on as many of your artists’ album covers lately. Can you talk about how that reflects a shift in creative philosophies among you and your artists?

    The classic Sacred Bones template was really important to the label in the very beginning. I still think it’s incredibly effective, and I always encourage people to use it, especially when it’s a new signing, because it signals to people that this is something to pay attention to, and that was the whole point when starting the label.

    Creating this template came from working at record stores for many years and seeing how well that kind of thing works. When you walk into a store and you see a record on the wall, on impulse, you’re like, … “Oh, I don’t know that one. I’ll check it out,” and that was the thinking behind the template. But it got to the point where many of our artists don’t need that anymore and can stand on their own. It’s now more of a choice than something we enforce.

    When you talk about it as a choice, it makes me wonder, have you ever heard from artists that including the logo and branding helps them with the creative aspects of putting together the artwork?

    I always try to encourage people to get creative with the template, to really try and make it part of the design. My favorites are the records that Institute designed with that in mind. Crystal Stilts did one that was really interesting. There’s a new Thou record coming out later this year that made the template part of the art. Those are the most successful versions of that idea.

    As a label head, you’re collaborating with everybody else who works at the label, and you’re collaborating with the artists, and you’ve talked about only signing artists that you personally connect with so that you’re basically working with friends. How do you know someone will be such a good collaborator that they become family? How do you build trust and safety with them?

    Just like any relationship, you can’t guarantee that things are going to go smoothly. Just like any relationship, if you treat it with love, kindness, and understanding, you can overcome some dark moments.

    We’re happy to be involved as much as the artist wants to be, but we like to step aside and let their process happen. Our involvement comes after the fact. It’s really about trying to take this thing that has been created and plant it and see it grow, and that’s where there needs to be a lot of trust from the artist. They really need to trust us. Being honest and open, and all of the things that make any relationship work, are equally important in a relationship with an artist.

    Some of what you said also made me think about the intersection between running a label as a business and as a creative endeavor. If you have any thoughts on that, I’d love to hear them.

    It is a business, too. I mean, it has to be. We have a staff who pays their rent every month, and…it’s important that we make money, because we live in a capitalist society and everyone needs to do that. But I think that if we are doing our jobs right, both as a label and an artist making good art we are able to make money. After doing this for 15 years, I think we’ve created enough of a community and gained the trust of music listeners to be successful if we’re doing our job right.

    You’ve previously said that most of the time, you do 50/50 splits with artists, and the goal is for artists to survive off their music without having other jobs. Can you talk about the value of being able to focus solely on one’s creative practice, both for you as a label head and for your musicians?

    Being able to do art full-time gives you a level of confidence that maybe isn’t always the case when you’re still hustling and working a bunch of different jobs. I think that confidence is such a huge part of any success. If you believe that something is amazing, then it’s likely that everyone else will.

    What does success mean to you?

    Success is being happy with what you’ve done or what you’ve made. Any other definition doesn’t make sense to me. There’s so much weight on making money, and I don’t think that’s a form of success.

    The biggest success for me is when we’re able to help an artist make a living. When an artist is able to make art full-time, to me, that’s success, for sure. That’s the goal, to help lift artists up and give them a platform to do what we believe they can do.

    Your work puts you close to art all the time, but I suppose you could argue that running a label is not itself art, or maybe you could argue that it is. I’m wondering where you fall on this.

    There are a lot of creative aspects [to running] a label. There’s the creative aspect of, what bands do you work with and how they interact with each other on an aesthetic level for the audience. I think there’s an art to that for sure. I think A&R is a real art. Marketing is an art. It’s a very creative process. It’s just a different form of creativity.

    I’m curious how you balance your creative needs as a label head with the need to make money.

    I have a lot of fun making merch, and all the branding stuff for the label is really fun for me, and that’s a big creative outlet for me personally. I really enjoy figuring out ways to make cool products for the records, interesting ways to present the music, and interesting events for bands to play. Things of that nature are creatively rewarding for me.

    Do you have any guiding philosophies behind that, beyond just the ouroboros and the triangle and the branding?

    It’s all about making sure that every little aspect of the finished record is good, really paying attention to the details, making sure the finish on the jacket itself is the right finish for the art, making sure the hype sticker looks good. All those things are really important.

    Reissues are a big part of the Sacred Bones story, and the fact that your reissues are primarily from filmmakers like David Lynch, Jim Jarmusch, and John Carpenter—whom you could argue are an order of magnitude better-known than even the most prominent Sacred Bones musician—is interesting to me. I’m wondering how working with legends like these helps you refine or expand the creative practice of running the label.

    Those experiences have been super important to the growth of the label. Just being associated with artists of that magnitude carries a lot of weight. When people are thinking about working with us, sometimes, they go like, “Wow, David Lynch works with them. They must be pretty good.” I do think it’s really opened some doors for us, and it’s just been a dream for me. These are people that I grew up admiring.

    How have you applied the lessons you’ve learned from working alongside these established figures to working with smaller or newer artists, or even lesser-known veterans?

    Oftentimes, working with a newer artist can be more difficult than working with a seasoned person who has just done it. The seasoned person has done it all, and they know how it goes, and they’re not really fussed about much. As long as it’s getting done, everything is good, whereas with a newer artist, you have to be much more patient, because this is all brand new to them. Every little thing is new. It’s like anything else. You’re learning something for the first time, so it’s scary. You don’t know if you’re making the right decisions. Once you’ve done it a bunch of times, it’s easier.

    I would love to hear more about what it’s like to collaborate with somebody like Lynch or Jarmusch or John Carpenter with whom you can be very hands-off.

    For the most part, those guys do the work, they turn it in, and they’re very collaborative on certain aspects. John is very open when it comes to artwork. For the most part, we handle all that stuff in-house and present him with options, and he’s usually quite easy. He’s mostly just interested in making the music, whereas someone like David Lynch really wants to have his touch on everything. He does it all, and we’re there just to support and help him out in whatever way we can. With Sqürl and the Jarmusch projects, it’s somewhere in between. He’s super collaborative. There’s a new record in the works, and we’ve been suggesting the collaborators and producers.

    I feel like Sacred Bones is the only label that would put out an album by a baby still inside the womb. How does turning your love for music into a business you own and manage let you pursue unorthodox creative endeavors like that?

    That is absolutely a direct benefit of having run a record label and created a platform where people can just experiment. Some things work, and some things don’t work, and it’s okay. It’s cool to be in a position where you can just take chances and let your collaborators run a little wild.

    With musicians, if they put out an album people don’t like, it could end their career or at least slow down their momentum, but with a label, I suppose that’s not necessarily true.

    Definitely, and I think about that a lot, and I feel really grateful. As a label, you can take chances and put out things that don’t hit the way that you want them to, and you get more chances to do that. It’s much harder for artists to do that. Especially with the press machine and all of that, it can be hard.

    You have a cult audience, in a way. Do you find your audience discoursing about what you’re releasing in a way that people discourse about a musician’s latest album or latest single?

    I don’t know. In my dreams, I suppose, sure. There are people who…have their Reddit chats or whatever talking about it, but I’m not sure. I don’t search that out. I hope that people are able to see the amount of effort and love that we put into running the record label and get as excited about it as we do. That’s the dream.

    Caleb Braaten Recommend:

    Go to the Movies! It’s increasingly harder and harder to spend two hours (or so) with no distractions. So, see a movie. Get a snack. Don’t look at your phone. It’s wonderful.

    New Jack Swing. There’s a lot of 90s revivalists out there currently and I think they are reviving the wrong era. Okay so technically this is late 80’s – early 90’s… but it’s sounds so good right now. Listen to Bobby Brown’s “On Our Own” from the Ghostbusters II soundtrack.

    Go visit the trees. They have a lot of wisdom to share.

    Take a deep dive into something that isn’t your work.

    Remember, it’s just a joke.

    This post was originally published on The Creative Independent.

  • The low-cost airline will be the first to feature the bestselling economy class seat in the Indian sub-continent

    This post was originally published on The Asian Age | Home.

  • The carrier has hiked fares and dropped travel agent commissions, as airport and online booking chaos – including flight delays and cancellations – erodes its reputation.

    This post was originally published on Michael West.

  • The GST Council has set up a Group of Ministers (GoM), under Karnataka CM Basavaraj Bommai, to suggest rationalisation in tax rates and more

    This post was originally published on The Asian Age | Home.

  • Mobile phone towers
    The Labor government has yet to say how it’ll “fix” the NBN, while the other telco giants are variously courting and badgering the ACCC about the use of mobile spectrum. It’s the game that never ends in the land of Australian telecommunications, reports Kim Wingerei.

    This post was originally published on Michael West.

  • A final decision is likely to be taken at the next meeting of the council in the first week of August

    This post was originally published on The Asian Age | Home.

  • States clamour for more revenue share

    This post was originally published on The Asian Age | Home.