Category: the


  • This content originally appeared on The Intercept and was authored by The Intercept.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • What do theme parties, abortion rights, and feminist rebellion have in common? Historian Jennifer Wright unearths women who, in their own subtle and not so subtle ways, defied the patriarchy, mocking original incel Anthony Comstock whose 19th-century repressive tactics are being used today in the far-right’s war on women. 

    In her dazzlingly researched books about Gilded Age legends like Mamie Fish, a character on the HBO series The Gilded Age, and innovative abortionist Madame Restell, Wright shows us that women have always found ways to wield power, even in times of deep inequality and political repression. Whether through eccentric parties or underground abortion networks, these women worked with what they had, where they were, and often did it with excitement. 

    Mamie Fish, for instance, bent society to her will through legendary parties, supporting seamstresses on strike, and introducing actresses and artists into elite circles. Her antics, from dog banquets to a monkey posing as a prince, weren’t just performance; they were power. 

    And then there’s Madame Restell: the go-to abortionist of 19th-century New York who never lost a patient and defied the patriarchy until the very end, possibly faking her own death to escape persecution.

    What are the rebel women of the Gilded Age trying to tell us? We need creativity in our resistance. Culture is fuel. Fashion, parties, and art can democratize power and offer joy in dark times. When we make activism fun, inclusive, and rooted in lived human experience, we inspire people to join the fight.

    For more on rebel women of the Gilded Age check out Jennifer Wright’s books Madame Restell The Life, Death, and Resurrection of Old New York’s Most Fabulous, Fearless, and Infamous Abortionist and also Glitz, Glam, and a Damn Good Time How Mamie Fish, Queen of the Gilded Age, Partied Her Way to Power. Now go throw a theme party fundraiser and get creative at your next protest.

    EVENTS AT GASLIT NATION:

    • September 29 4pm ET – Join the Gaslit Nation Book Club for a discussion of Harriet Tubman: The Moses of Her People by Sarah Bradford. 

    • Minnesota Signal group for Gaslit Nation listeners in the state to find each other, available on Patreon. 

    • Vermont Signal group for Gaslit Nation listeners in the state to find each other, available on Patreon. 

    • Arizona-based listeners launched a Signal group for others in the state to connect, available on Patreon. 

    • Indiana-based listeners launched a Signal group for others in the state to join, available on Patreon. 

    • Florida-based listeners are going strong meeting in person. Be sure to join their Signal group, available on Patreon. 

    • Have you taken Gaslit Nation’s HyperNormalization Survey Yet?

    • Gaslit Nation Salons take place Mondays 4pm ET over Zoom and the first ~40 minutes are recorded and shared on Patreon.com/Gaslit for our community

     


    This content originally appeared on Gaslit Nation and was authored by Andrea Chalupa.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on The Real News Network and was authored by The Real News Network.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • I have photographed a number of protests and rallies this year in Chicago. It’s clear to me that we will all work together to ensure that trans folks and immigrants have a home in this city.


    This content originally appeared on The Progressive — A voice for peace, social justice, and the common good and was authored by Zach Caddy.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on Laura Flanders & Friends and was authored by Laura Flanders & Friends.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Comprehensive coverage of the day’s news with a focus on war and peace; social, environmental and economic justice.

    The post The Pacifica Evening News, Weekdays – September 1, 2025 appeared first on KPFA.


    This content originally appeared on KPFA – The Pacifica Evening News, Weekdays and was authored by KPFA.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • You have a rich career and background, and I bet you know what works lyrically and what makes a good song. How do you know when you’re making progress or creating something unique?

    For me, it’s more about the connection I feel with the process. It’s that moment when you’re digging into something, whether alone, with your team, or in a social setting, and you sense whether something is happening or not. When you’re creating, like a song or any piece of work, and translating what your deep instincts are telling you, that’s when something ignites—and you can notice it or not. It’s pretty easy to tell when you’re on the right track—whether you can keep working or developing the idea until you find something new or special. But you never really know. You start with some intuition, and sometimes it leads nowhere or results in something disappointing. Now, I’m more aware of removing all the expectations for success or rhythm.

    Following up on what you said about removing expectations, how do you know when a song is done and that you have reached the limit of where it’s supposed to be?

    At the beginning, it’s hard to know. In my new album, I have a few examples of when I knew it was done and how some songs are so generous. It’s as if every thought or idea you have, strangely, fits. But most of the time, it is trial and error, and then something starts happening. And sometimes after certain attempts, too, you say, “Okay, let’s switch. Let’s move on. Let’s destroy this and let’s start with a new one.”

    But it has to be a game. It’s about playing more than [the] game [itself]. You’re playing with these ingredients to create something, and you don’t know what you’re going to cook. You reach a point where you say, “Oh, that’s it. That’s what I’m cooking.” Or “I know what the flavor is.” So, chasing that, sometimes you’re not creating as much as you’re discovering. Just, “Oh, I have this stone, so now I have to dig what is inside and sculpt it because it’s there.” There are different ways to find a piece.

    And what about the opposite? When do you know how to stop pursuing an idea? Can you let go of something that you have invested time and energy in, or do you keep trying?

    I believe you need some talent or practice to know when to leave things. Whether something turns out interesting or not. Because sometimes, when you feel, “Oh, I made that. It’s incredible,” it can be dangerous. You might think, “Okay, I can add everything—chocolate, vanilla, salt.” But passing that point can ruin the piece. At the same time, when you’re aiming for something and don’t get it, it’s usually clear that it’s not going to happen.

    That’s why, in my experience—initially with the band, bringing in ideas or songs at the start of an album or during the creative process with the team—you often don’t know how your ideas will be received. Sometimes, I have expectations for certain songs and think, “Oh, those are the ones I like.” But very often, the team prefers something else I didn’t expect. I think, “If you like that, then it’s good.” Having an outside perspective is valuable in the creative process, and that’s mainly what producers provide.

    For this album, I needed a big-picture view. I was creating something, but wasn’t sure if the songs were worth it or if I should bring them to the band. The songs were already produced because the composition led me to add elements—music and production—but I realized, “No, this is overproduced for the band.” The band usually starts with a rough idea or arrangement, but most of the arrangements were already well-developed. I knew it wasn’t for the band, so I asked Gustavo Santaolalla to listen. He shared his perspective and clarified what I couldn’t see, which was very helpful.

    Then, you hand over those decisions to others—that’s when you learn to let go. If you have someone else’s point of view or a team that can tell you, “Okay, stop it now,” or help you decide whether to keep going, that’s important. At a certain point, you need help. From my experience creating music or videos, having a team is essential.

    In your new album, you are singing in all of the songs. What is your relationship with your voice and with singing?

    I can recognize and honor the way I’ve been. I was about to say I was unconsciously preparing myself for this, but it was probably something conscious, or maybe my subconscious deeply said, “Oh, someday you’re going to need me.” So, let’s start with that. I’ve been taking singing classes with the same teacher for 20 years. My singing teacher, Erika, is incredible. She has guided me to something that, now I realize, has supported my vocal growth over the years and has supported this project. It’s the songs and the vocals. And I don’t know—it’s like the chicken and the egg: which came first? But it’s closely related because the way I perform from the beginning, from the construction and creation of the songs, carries an energy I didn’t understand until one of the collaborators said, “Oh, this is important.”

    Even though I feel more confident with my voice, I don’t yet have the same experience that singers build over the years. I lack the muscle memory of the instrument. Now I’m starting to learn and discover I have other practices—stage presence, keyboard, dancing, whatever—that help me control the machines and see the show from a specific perspective, knowing what to do and how to push to enhance the show and the energy. But now, working on the album and carrying it forward, it’s something I’ve been experiencing, and I really like it. I didn’t expect it, but now I realize I’ll have to do it again in life and think of myself as a singer. And that’s still processing in my brain, or maybe my consciousness is asking, “Why are you questioning that?” I don’t know. I just feel that I’ve been doing one thing for more than three decades, and now I have to suddenly switch gears and trust that I am really a singer.

    Also, you are going to be a full-time frontman for the first time.

    Yeah. Your senses have to be ready for that.

    In what ways?

    The most important, to the audience because it’s all about them. We can play or perform in a rehearsal, but what makes the show happen is the audience, and the way you relate to them is the way the show is going to become something or not. And I’ve been going to the best university to learn how to be a frontman, which is to see Rubén every night performing when we play in front of an audience. He’s the master of that. And he has built something. He has it. From day one, he has had it, for sure; he built something incredible. And the rest of the band knew that, and we just worked to take care of that. All the shows, we just put the land so he can do what he knows or wants to do every night.

    But watching him doesn’t make me a frontman. So now I am practicing, and I have to create something that I don’t know how to do. In the past few shows we’ve had, I said, “Just be yourself.” I don’t know how to speak to the audience. Well, I don’t have to, but I can try. If I make a mistake, well, it’s a mistake. It’s a happy problem. As long as you enjoy the moment, stay present and trust in the music, perform, have fun, and enjoy witnessing an exciting audience, then that is a connection.

    Each one of you in Café Tacvba brings a unique creative energy and talent. Can you describe the moment when that creativity aligns when you are working together?

    It’s interesting because it happens in the studio, when we are rehearsing, or when we’re working on a song or on an album. There are certain moments when the band knows, “That’s it.” It’s like another entity, right there. We are four people, and then there is the band. So we’re a community that is pretty connected. But we can have very dispersed points of view and contrasting ideas. And that’s natural, but that’s one of the elements of creation, chaos, and friction. But being able to work inside the chaos is fundamental, which is very chaotic.

    And then suddenly something happens, a chunk, a spark, and “Oh, that’s really nice.” Or “I don’t know what happened, and I don’t know what it’s sounding like,” and that’s another hint that something is good. Is when it doesn’t sound like what we were expecting, and we don’t understand it, but it’s really exciting. So when we know, “Oh, it sounds like something”, or it seems pretty close to something that we either like or that another member is like, yes, but why don’t we just move to another direction? Or when someone is having doubts, as a team, we can say, “No, no, no, no, no, it’s incredible. Just leave it. “

    You have worked with Gustavo Santaolalla on multiple projects. What makes this collaboration so unique?

    Well, he’s very talented and has been honing his skills. He has an instinct and trusts it so deeply that it helps you recognize when you’re in a good moment. At the same time, he can zoom in and focus on the small details, then zoom out to see what’s happening with the song, the project, the band, the energy, the health of each person, the future of the career, the past, the relationships, and the industry. Then he can return to the note. “No, this is the chord.” That’s pretty special, especially in a relationship that’s now more than friendship—more than brotherhood.

    We have developed a language and respect for each other that’s very important when working on something. How he approaches the work and views his role matters a lot. He often says, “The most important thing is the project, not you. Or in this case, not even you as a solo artist. What does my opinion have to do with the project you’re part of? I see you’re building a career, so it’s important, but if you don’t agree with me, it’s okay. That’s your problem.” He’s willing to push boundaries, sometimes to the point where you’re uncomfortable, but he’s just pursuing what he believes is right for the song, for the idea. That determination is crucial when you’re in the middle of chaos, which is pretty normal when creating something without a clear point of view. It helps you grow.

    You just mentioned that there are moments in the creative process when you don’t feel comfortable. How do you know when to push through that or when it is better to switch directions?

    Well, you never really know. You have to test what discomforts are so intense that you cannot stay or stand by them. Being able to try and being more flexible is part of the challenge—like a dog’s tail wagging and saying, “Okay, that’s enough. That’s enough. Oh, I’m going to break. I’m going to break.” Probably your team or the producer says, “Okay, that’s enough. Good that you moved a little.” Or you say, “Let’s try this.” And they reply, “No.” Then you suggest again, “Let’s try, let’s try.” Until finally, you say, “That’s enough.” Sometimes, you don’t see the boundary or limit, and that’s what mainly happens in creative teams. Someone pushes too hard and breaks something, then says, “That’s it. No more.” Usually, several times until they declare, “That’s it. I can’t keep this conversation or relation anymore.” Truly, in a band or during a creative process, this happens a few times. But when you think, “Oh, maybe he went too far,” you have to speak up or prepare to be clearer next time. Honest conversation always helps. It’s healthy to talk openly. But again, sometimes you just need to test it. The incredible part is that you have the chance to test various uncomfortable situations. It’s more common to face discomfort than to stay in your comfort zone, which everyone says to avoid. For some, it’s okay to remain there, but I’ve been discovering that at first, it might be uncomfortable, yet eventually you become comfortable because it becomes part of you on a deep level.

    You are part of Café Tacvba, of course, one of the most important bands in Latin America. Is that liberating in the sense that you have nothing else to prove and you can have complete creative freedom, or is it more like it comes with some limitations?

    I am discovering it right now, but I am pretty open to everything. I have my principles, and there are certain things that I probably cannot do, but I believe the band showed me that freedom. It’s some of the values that you’ve got to keep throughout the creative process of your career. That’s what the band has been practicing and proving, that every time it’s a success. It’s a success in the way that if you try to reinvent yourself as many times as you like, but there are certain things that you can create in a different way, that maybe can allow you to become something different.

    What does success look like in this particular moment of your career?

    Exactly this. I mean, I’m in New York talking about the new solo project during a very interesting conversation. Of course, I want the new music to reach as many people as possible, but you never know. Also, I realize that in this digital era, there are so many options competing for attention. But I am a veteran, I have been doing this for over three decades, and I’m here, enjoying it. I hope this new album will help me keep performing and give me the opportunity to continue doing what I love. I’m exploring, and I hope it will open new doors, so I can feel uncomfortable and probably discover something new at the same time. Returning to the band and other projects that bring me joy.

    You have been with your band for over 35 years, have travelled the world and set foot on so many stages, collaborated with so many talented people, one of your albums is ranked as number 1 in a list of the 50 best Latin American Rock Albums, and you just called yourself a veteran! What would you say to the 20-year-old Meme?

    Enjoy everything. Enjoy everything. I did it, but when you’re young, you don’t have the perspective on what is happening in the present moment. When you’re 20 years old, you’re not close to the end of your life. You don’t know when it’s going to end. But what I’m sure now, if I am lucky, is that I’m closer to the end than when I was 20. So being right here right now, it’s a success of living anyway, but sometimes you’re so conscious about the gift you have and the opportunity and how fortunate you are. I always know, and I know I’m conscious right now, and I have always been, but I probably miss a little bit of joy in a certain way. I like to say, “Okay, that’s a happy problem.” So just relax.

    Meme del Real recommends:

    Peregrino transparente, Juan Cárdenas, book

    Le otto montagne, movie

    Johan Sebastian Bach, Vikingur Ólafsson, album

    Walking in nature

    Practicing yoga


    This content originally appeared on The Creative Independent and was authored by Miriam Garcia.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Immigration today provokes some of the fiercest political passions in the UK. It changes the shape of communities, stretches housing and public services, and unsettles those who feel the familiar slipping away from them. These concerns, in themselves, are not signs of prejudice. They deserve to be heard and addressed honestly. As George Eliot wrote, […]

    To read this article, log in here or subscribe here.
    If you are logged in but can’t read CP+ articles, check the status of your access here
    In order to read CP+ articles, your web browser must be set to accept cookies.

    The post Fear at the Gate appeared first on CounterPunch.org.


    This content originally appeared on CounterPunch.org and was authored by Peter Bach.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • People stand under a statue of Jean-Jacques Dessalines, a leader of the Haitian Revolution and the first ruler of an independent Haiti, on February 10, 2018, in Port-au-Prince, Haiti. Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images.

    In August 1791, slaves in the French colony of Saint-Domingue revolted, rising up by the thousands. Within ten days they’ve taken over the whole northern province. By the following year, they controlled a third of the colony. It was the spark that would ignite the Haitian revolution — a 13-year-long endeavour. Independence would finally come on January 1, 1804. But they would have to defeat three European countries to get there.

    This is episode 64 of Stories of Resistance—a podcast produced by The Real News. Each week, we’ll bring you stories of resistance like this. Inspiration for dark times.

    Please consider supporting this podcast and Michael Fox’s reporting on his Patreon accountpatreon.com/mfox. There you can also see exclusive pictures, video, and interviews. 

    If you like what you hear, please subscribe, like, share, comment, or leave a review. And please consider signing up for the Stories of Resistance podcast feed, either in SpotifyApple PodcastsSpreaker, or wherever you listen.

    Written and produced by Michael Fox.

    Transcript

    Michael Fox, narrator:

    This is a story they don’t want you to hear about a slave revolt that sparked a revolution and a new nation. About a people rising up and freeing themselves. And then fighting off not one, but three of the most powerful militaries in the world. A story about the first independent country in the Americas after the United States, and a people who would not stop fighting until they were free.

    A story about the freedom and Independence of Haiti.

    The year is 1791. The place, Saint-Domingue. It’s a French colony in the Caribbean on the western half of the island of Hispaniola. Saint-Domingue is known as the “Pearl of the Antilles” for its beauty and riches. The colony produces roughly 60% of the world’s coffee and 40% of the sugar imported by France and Britain. It is the most profitable colony in all of the Caribbean.

    But it is also one of the most disastrous. That’s because the wealth is generated by a system of slavery that is brutal, severe and massive. Almost half of the one million slaves in the Caribbean at the time are laboring in Saint-Domingue. Black slaves make up almost 90% of the colony’s population. Most are African born. They’re ruled over by a small group of white landowners. They’re forced to work to the bone. Literally to the death. And yellow fever outbreaks wreak havoc on their communities.

    When people die, more are kidnapped from Africa to be sent across the ocean to labor to the death to make ever more profit for the rich and the powerful.

    In August 1791, however, they had had enough. They revolt on August 21. They rise up by the thousands, killing their oppressors. Within 10 days they’ve taken over the whole northern province. But white landowners respond, creating militias and killing thousands of former slaves.

    The slave revolt spreads. 100,000 former African slaves join. By the next year, they control a third of Saint-Domingue.

    They’re inspired by France’s 1789 Constitutional ”Declaration of the Rights of Man,” which declared all men free and equal, though it did not free slaves across the French colonies. It was only the beginning of the slave revolt that sparked a revolution that would take 13 years to be fulfilled.

    Former slaves Georges Biassou, Jean-François Papillon, and Toussaint Louverture would become important freedom fighters, first against the white landowners and the system of slavery and then against foreign occupiers and then against the French. 

    Both the British and the Spanish would invade and occupy the colony. The Spanish promised freedom to those who fought on their side, and many joined, including most of the rebellion’s leaders. The French, however, proclaimed the abolition of slavery in 1794, and Toussaint Louverture switched sides — again fighting for the French.

    In the subsequent years, Louverture would rid Saint-Domingue of the Spanish and then the British, establishing control over most of the colony. In 1801, Louverture and others wrote their own Constitution explicitly outlawing slavery, and declaring Louverture governor-general for life. 

    But it did not declare Saint-Domingue’s independence. Louverture tried to convince French Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte of his loyalty. It did not go well.

    Bonaparte sent in tens of thousands of troops to occupy the colony in 1802. They arrested and deported Louverture to France alongside a hundred of his closest allies. He would die there in prison the next year. 

    Saint-Domingue independence fighter Jean-Jacques Dessalines would defeat the French in 1803, after their forces were decimated by yellow fever. He declared the country’s independence on January 1, 1804. 

    They called it  Haiti, the original name for the island for the native Taíno people. 

    A slave revolt that became a revolution and founded a new nation, 13 years in the making. The first country in Latin America to gain its freedom. The only country to win independence from a slave revolt. Hundreds of thousands of men, women, and children freed.


    Hi folks, thanks for listening. I’m your host Michael Fox.

    Last Saturday, August 23, was the International Day for the Remembrance of the Slave Trade and its Abolition. The date is a commemoration of Haiti’s 1791 uprising that sparked the revolution that abolished slavery in Haiti and would lead to the country’s independence. 

    As always, if you like what you hear and enjoy this podcast, please consider becoming a subscriber on my Patreon. It’s only a few dollars a month. I have a ton of exclusive content there, only available to my supporters. And every supporter really makes a difference.

    This is the latest episode of Stories of Resistance, a podcast series produced by The Real News. Each week, I bring you stories of resistance and hope like this. Inspiration for dark times. If you like what you hear, please subscribe, like, share, comment, or leave a review.

    Thanks for listening. See you next time.


    This content originally appeared on The Real News Network and was authored by Michael Fox.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on The Intercept and was authored by The Intercept.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Comprehensive coverage of the day’s news with a focus on war and peace; social, environmental and economic justice.

    The post The Pacifica Evening News, Weekdays – August 29, 2025 appeared first on KPFA.


    This content originally appeared on KPFA – The Pacifica Evening News, Weekdays and was authored by KPFA.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on The Real News Network and was authored by The Real News Network.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on The Grayzone and was authored by The Grayzone.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on The Grayzone and was authored by The Grayzone.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on The Intercept and was authored by The Intercept.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Comprehensive coverage of the day’s news with a focus on war and peace; social, environmental and economic justice.

    The post The Pacifica Evening News, Weekdays – August 28, 2025 appeared first on KPFA.


    This content originally appeared on KPFA – The Pacifica Evening News, Weekdays and was authored by KPFA.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on The Grayzone and was authored by The Grayzone.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on VICE News and was authored by VICE News.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on The Real News Network and was authored by The Real News Network.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • You published over 300 books over the course of your career, which is no small feat. What is your process? How do you plan out your work?

    I’m not sure whether or not I had a plan to begin with. It was sort of by accident that I realized my 100th book was the first thing that ever got noticed by a film producer and got optioned. And then my 200th book came out, I looked around and said, “I have to move to a different country.” And then, as I was approaching 40, I realized I had 260 some books. So I thought “Okay, 300’s an obvious goal. I can say 300 books by 40 and we’ll just see what happens.” Of course, I miscounted and it ended up being 311 books by 40. I think that the real goal with making comics for me has always been make the right kind of comics so that I have total freedom to continue making whatever the fuck I want to make.

    Last year, in November, I announced for the sake of accountability, that I’d be putting out 17 books and I think here we are in August and I’ve put out four of those 17. But I’ve also put out seven other things that I hadn’t had any idea were coming. I’m the sort of a mix between incredibly ADHD where I have to be doing something new every four to seven minutes, but also a fast enough worker that all those things end up getting done.

    You mentioned 17 books being planned for this year, only doing four of the planned ones, but doing seven different unplanned things. How much of that do you contribute to getting burnt out and needing to pivot to something maybe more rejuvenating?

    People keep warning me about burnout and I have this pretty high level of oppositional defiant disorder where someone tells me something’s going to happen and I say, “Absolutely not, that’s some dumb human bullshit for other people.”

    I can remember one time where I was starting to feel drained and I was on a call with some other comic creators. One of them gave me really helpful advice about how when he’s well-rested, he makes better work and he can work faster if he’s taken a break. My brain went and said, “That’s not for Richard, though.” And I made entirely new these little 100-page horror shows that day.

    This is just what happens. The more people tell me that I’m going to fall apart, the more I say, “let’s see.” Because the truth is if it all comes crashing down, then I’ll have the answer to the ultimate question, which is, “How many comics can I make before I die?”

    Speaking of your 100-page horror comics, I know that you’ve published several on Kickstarter, each of which explores a specific kind of focus. I know there’s one about exploring obsession. There’s one about literally being seen and what that means. What do you like about that more limited format specifically for horror?

    I think that I don’t want to dwell on things that scare me. And with these books, usually just a little idea will pop into my head and I’ll spend five or 10 minutes letting my mind run with it and seeing what I can come up with.

    These books, they’re less like comics and more like illustrated poems, honestly. What I’m able to do with the 100-page format is essentially explore one core thread throughout. The rule for those is when I have the idea, I give myself 10 minutes to see if it has legs. If I think it has legs, I just put aside whatever else I’m doing and I’ll do non-stop 24-hour work day and finish the book.

    It means that I don’t have to take too much time out from anything else. It refreshes me to come back to my other thing the next day. It means that I’ve got a set amount of time that I can delve into every single possible version of why that thing is scary. For instance, with Crooked Little Town, it was what if there’s an entire town turned physically crooked by the weight of generational guilt and then it just became this like a man wandering through a space bent over by physical weight through crooked trees smoking a crooked cigarette, reflecting on what has turned the town this way. And any single sentence in that book could be implying 30 other things. It allows me to just get that out of the way.

    Horror is such a popular genre on the platform and in comics in general. Are there any other genres that you’re interested in exploring?

    I have done a lot of memoir stuff, as you know. With comics, a lot of it comes down to how far can I push the comic medium. That’s the thing that always holds my interest because I think it’s such an unexplored language. I’ve said many times, but comics became codified so quickly by superheroes and then we went digital.

    I know we can get into the argument that comics have existed since the days of cave paintings, but I’m talking about comics as we understand them as the modern American art form. They went digital so quickly and I think that we left behind a lot of the potential of what physical could still do. There is a language there that is complex and there are so many pieces fitting together. Every page of a comic is some amount of time that begins and ends at the top left and bottom right. The freedom within that is limitless.

    So, in terms of genre, horror is a great genre to explore with comics because it’s a genre that can rely on suspense and dense detail or empty space or the haunting nature of seeing nothingness. It’s a genre that relies on you imagining other things. And so having the space of the gutter between panels really like highlights like here’s one beat, here’s another. You put together what happened in between. I want to explore everything in comics. I spend a lot of time thinking about romance, a lot of time thinking about comedy is one of the hardest things to do in comics, straight comedy because of course, comedy relies on movement so often. It’s very hard to show a funny bear in a suit falling on his bottom if you have to show him standing up and then sitting down and expect people to guess what happened in between.

    You’re legally blind, and yet you’ve chosen comics, this very visual medium as your central medium, as your art. How does limited vision play a role in what you choose to put on the page?

    It’s less that it’s a visual medium and more that it’s a completely flat medium. A big part of my eyesight deficiency is that I only have one eye. Well, I have two eyes that both work a tiny little bit, but the one on my left eye is so poor that my brain doesn’t process any images coming in through it in the same way that it does with the eye on the right. So I cannot see anything out of my left eye, or if I do, it’s all subconscious, which means I don’t really have depth perception or at least I have real trouble perceiving it properly.

    My right eye wobbles all over the place to kind of try and form a focal point, but essentially the world to me looks much flatter than it does to the rest of you. And drawing has always been a way for me to make sense.

    My parents were very insistent that I had to know how to read and write before I started kindergarten. So I made my first book when I was just about to turn four. It was about Donald Duck going to a haunted house and Mickey doesn’t show up to go with him. So he goes out on his own and he meets a ghost in the attic who has no friends. And Donald realizes he has no friends either. So he shoots himself in the face so he can stay with the ghost forever. I don’t know if I’ll ever get to publish that because of some trademark issues, but we’ll see.

    I just started drawing the world and it was a very easy way to put things into my own perspective. Visually I try to lead people with the way that my eye would see the world. I try to say here’s the panel, here’s the thing that I’m noticing. I’m very aware there’s other stuff going on around me, but I have a very limited field of vision and so I’ll draw that stuff afterwards. There’s a strange focus to everything I do but I think it’s also why there’s an inherent clarity because I’ve had to strip away all of the distractions that other people are dealing with.

    I love hearing that you’ve been writing books since you were a kid as I have two young kids myself. I think it’s great to be creating from such a young age. How much do you feel like your work has evolved and changed over the years? Do you feel like there are different acts or different seasons of what you’ve been exploring?

    I think that I was incredibly unhappy in my life growing up. I was living in New Zealand. It’s a very small country. At least the suburb that I lived in had a real mindset of why would anyone try to do anything more? These are the things you are expected to like and that really kind of just put me in a place of always feeling very outside. I think you can really see in all the stuff that I did as a child very little of which is available in the world.

    The stuff that I have shown people is very much about someone who is unhappy, someone who is looking for something more magical and pretty consistently stories about my desire to become a ghost at some point because that’s absolute freedom. Then I’d get into the complicated nature of being a ghost…one of my favorite activities is playing on a slide and you really can’t do that as a ghost because there’s just no tension there.

    A lot of that time it’s about looking at what is the world missing or what would I have wanted my younger self to have. I spent about 10 years working almost exclusively in children’s books, picture books, and all ages horror comics. During that time, I was very clearly writing books for 8 to 12 year-old Richard. You look at the work I’m doing now and these books are more for people who I want to hang out with now to enjoy.

    I realize I’ve made enough stuff for a kid Richard. He can get over it and find his own shit to read. I’m going to make books for the cool grown-ups who I want to hang out with because I really don’t want to be hanging out with cool grown-ups talking about a 10-year-old’s trauma at a spooky beach.

    As we talk about these different eras in my career, I have been doing the Richard Sucks stuff now for two and a half years. I think there’s 28 books in the series in that publishing line. And I was really feeling like this is a slow build. It’s a niche market. it’s weirdo shit. And then three months ago at a convention, I was at an afterparty. We were all having to sign and do remarques on posters for the show. And someone asked me to do a remarque. I said, “Sure. What do you want me to draw?” And he said, “I don’t know.” And a friend of mine leaned back in his chair and yelled loudly, “Richard’s really good at drawing dicks.” That night I drew 57 dicks on Fan Expo posters.

    And so now I’m in this weird phase where I’m doing two more memoirs this year at least because they’re sort of already underway. I’ve got this sapphic teen witchcraft thing. And then, at the same time, I’m also branching out.

    I got this whole new line called Dicks by Richard because I draw really good dicks for people. I’m trying to figure out if I want to do a book called The Dick Pics of Dorian Gay, which I think will come out later this year. I think a lot about when you go on any dating app and you start seeing the same profile pictures over and over again. You realize there are these people who haven’t updated their profile pictures for years and they just become invisible. I want to do the reverse of that of someone whose Grinder pics are aging while they don’t.

    I’m working on a new thing called Bob Dylan Sopranos McDonald’s or BDSM for short, which is about the importance of the value of a name and how a name when it becomes linked to something more famous the original meaning gets lost. Bob Dylan is named for Dylan Thomas, but everyone named Dylan is just named after Bob Dylan. You don’t hear soprano without thinking of Tony Soprano instead of the singer. You don’t hear about McDonald without thinking of the popular burger restaurant. And my mother can’t think of me as being called Richard without being reminded that she did name me after her abusive father.

    And so, how famous do I have to become as Richard before, or at least how much do I have to identify myself as a new version of Richard, before my mother stops being terrified of me on some subconscious level? So, fun light stuff.

    Richard Fairgray Recommends:

    The musician Victor Jones, mostly for his new single “Mother Teresa,” but also “Shoulder Song” and (the B side) “Home With You.

    Halt and Catch Fire,” arguably the best show of this century so far.

    Nando’s Peri Peri sauce on rice and tuna.

    Sorry, Baby is a top 10 film for me this year.

    The movie Nano Shark which I haven’t seen, but the tagline is ‘We’re gonna need a smaller boat.”


    This content originally appeared on The Creative Independent and was authored by Sam Kusek.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • The post The Progressive Case for Tariffs appeared first on CounterPunch.org.


    This content originally appeared on CounterPunch.org and was authored by Sara Steffens.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Photo by Ryan Moreno

    One of the oldest maxims in advertising is that sex “sells.” But it turns out that race – and racial controversy – “sells,” too. Witness the sprawling controversy over an American Eagle advertising campaign to promote sales of its new line of blue jeans. The campaign features Sydney Sweeney, an aspiring actress who’s considered a rising Hollywood star in some circles. She’s not the first sexy blue-eyed blonde to be treated by advertisers as a shapely “hook” for their hot new brand, but her company’s tag line quickly raised some eyebrows. “Sydney Sweeney has great jeans” – the message in voice over – was meant to be a subtle – and deliberate – double entendre. Did the company mean “jeans,” as the ad actually reads in print, or is it implying that Sweeney also has “great genes,” a not-so-subtle riff on her racial background, and to some, a presumption of racial “privilege” – or worse, “superiority.”  Sweeney herself went on to riff on the genes/jeans connection herself, seemingly amping up the racial innuendo.

    Of course, the company still denies any racializing intent – but it wasn’t long before social media posters raged across the Internet.Was American Eagle promoting “White supremacy”? Weeks later, Tik Tokers and You Tubers are still avidly debating the issue. Clearly, the company’s fully aware of what it’s doing – creating buzz and stoking consumer interest in its new apparel line. There’s another old saying in advertising: “Call me anything, just spell my name right.”  Indeed, American has already raked in some $400 million in new sales since the Sweeney ad campaign began. And the company’s doubling-down on its ad campaign, publicly disavowing any need to apologize for any “misunderstanding” – wink, wink – that its edgy tag line has created.

    It’s not just thinly-veiled racism that’s being assailed by critics. Some are suggesting that the ads are also highly “sexualized,” with Sweeney cast in some provocative poses, suggestive of a soft-core porn shoot, perhaps. The actress is pushing 30 but she’s made up to look like a pouty and defiant nymphet, maybe even a teenager, in one spot, displaying oodles of skin. American Eagle is getting something of a two-fer here: raising the hackles of conservatives and liberals alike, and creating a feeding frenzy that in theory, could damage the company’s brand – but instead, in today’s amped up sex and often vitriolic racial culture – where every word and inflection is parsed for meaning –  appears to be stoking it to new heights. If few people knew who American Eagle the company was a month ago, virtually the entire country knows now.  

    And America Eagle’s competitors are pouncing. Levi’s, one of the largest and most established denim brands, has since expanded its own ad campaign, this one featuring a proud African-American woman at the center. And not just any Black woman, but Beyonce, or Bey, as she’s known to her adoring fans. No one has made the racial connection explicit – but it’s obvious anyway. White supremacy you’re promoting?  Well, how about a heavy dose of Afro-centrism in reply?  Beyonce’s dressed in a full-length blue jeans suit, not the kind of wear you typically might see her in and she’s not the small slender woman Sweeney is. She looks like a Blue Jean Goddess or a Denim Queen, towering over her universe. While Sweeney inspires a certain lasciviousness, Bey commands respect and awe. In other words, game on.

    There may be more than one way to look at what’s going on here. One is that these two beleaguered jeans companies cooked up the entire race controversy together to create social media buzz about their respective product lines, and did so cynically to boost sales. But maybe it’s just a timely confluence – or opportunistic piggy-backing – at work: Levis saw an opportunity to counter the “White supremacist” scandal with a “Black pride” response. I favor conspiracy theory. Why? Because it takes considerable advance planning and effort to contract actors, develop and test ad messaging, and organize the actual shoots. The timing here was just a little too perfect, as if American Eagle and Levis were just lying in wait, ready to pounce on unsuspecting consumers, with the roll-out of their consecutive ad campaigns nicely in “sync.”

    There’s another reason to believe that the two companies knew what they were doing all along. The jeans industry is actually in trouble, maybe even dire trouble, as blue jeans sales among youngsters especially have declined somewhat sharply over the past two years. The decline was apparent as far back as 2019-2020, but a post-COVID bump seemed like the market might rebound; instead, consumers have grown increasingly cautious about discretionary clothing purchases ever since, and even worse, apparel fashion preferences are evolving; while jeans are still in broadly speaking, it turns out that Gen Z consumers, especially young women, are souring on denim. Big time. 

    A consumer report published last year tells the story in stark numbers. Young women under 30 are developing new tastes – and with less income are prioritizing their purchases; denim is still great as casual wear but it’s less functional for the office and for the evening night out. And women are clearly becoming more “feminine” – and formal – in their apparel tastes. As a result, a real sense of crisis has begun to set in among the major jeans companies – they’re desperate to capture these rapidly defecting young consumers, ensuring the brand “loyalty” that will make them – and their children –consumers for life. And when you’re down and nearly out, stodgy appeals surely won’t do. Getting those consumers back in the fold requires some bold risk-taking.

    So there you have it. The real subtext to this controversy may not be racial at all.  Or even a matter of protecting young consumers – or the rest of us – from “hyper-sexual” messaging. The real subtext is grubby economics – or good-old fashioned capitalism. Jean companies are afraid of losing their market, especially their future market, which relies upon cultivating the apparel tastes of youngsters, especially women, who have always comprised the dominant share of jeans commerce. Sydney and Beyonce may or may not have great jeans – or genes; in fact, neither woman, by most accounts, even wears blue jeans all that much, certainly not in public. Maybe they will more often from now on – but don’t count on it.  Will it even matter?  American Eagle and Levi sales are booming again; by riffing on race, their clever marketing gambit has allowed the two companies to go to war, while appealing across the spectrum, drawing in White and Black Gen-Zers alike, stoking the growth of the overall market. Sydney’s fans are happy – and so are Bey’s. And the two icons – handsomely paid for their willing service as warring sales props – are beginning to make these two beleaguered jeans companies extremely happy.  

    Give these two companies some credit. At a time when “DEI” is everywhere under siege, their clever marketing executives have found a way to make America’s unending racial drama bankable. They’ve staged a performance – and attracted a growing audience. Their investors are surely cheering. The rest of us? We barely know what hit us.

    There is a danger in this kind of marketing, however – the potential for a sustained backlash. Not just a backlash against the racial innuendo but a backlash from consumers who may not really want to be implicated in the jeans war. While sales of American Eagle jeans are clearly up (online,at least), foot traffic to store outlets is down almost 10%. Not everyone is comfortable, perhaps, being seen shopping for jeans associated with racial innuendo. And Sweeney’s new indie film?  It just bombed at the box office, defying expectations of a windfall. The film may eventually rebound, industry insiders say, but Sweeney’s celebrity aura is taking a hit in Hollywood, leading her diehard fans to denounce the “hate.”

    Beyonce’s such a celebrity superstar that her own shiny tiara will likely survive the continuing controversy.  Still, politics – and political controversy – while creating a powerful buzz, can also be a real minefield. Just ask Bud Light about its use of Dylan Mulvaney as a product spokesperson. Companies that play with politics for self-serving ends often find that consumers don’t see the politics involved as a game. In the end, issues of sexism and racism cause real world pain and suffering. To the extent that the comfort and ease that consumers feel wearing blue jeans is diminished, their interest in having them in their wardrobe might also decline. Wait until the first young girl gets denounced at the shopping mall for flaunting her “Nazi” jeans. Could it happen? Time will tell. But the ultimate test will be returns on investment. Unless sales rebound, and denim takes off with youth again, the jeans companies that promoted this thinly-veiled consumer war may not themselves survive.

    In fact, the American Eagle/Levi’s jeans “war” is already expanding. GAP and two other companies have just introduced their own new jeans apparel lines aimed once again at Gen Z women. Their sales are booming well beyond American Eagle’s. GAP, it may be recalled, designed a very snazzy ad campaign in the 1980s using African-American urban hop-hop music as a theme.  They weren’t selling jeans – just casual leisure apparel. Today, their jeans models are dancing once again, this time to more modern Afro-centric pop themes. The company’s serving up wholesome fun – and the sex and race politics is not only muted but decidedly PC.

    GAP’s even adding insult to injury. Their former top CEO has just penned an op-ed trashing American Eagle and Sydney Sweeney for playing on sexualized racism. Talk about ingratitude! American Eagle got the whole shebang started and now its successor marketers are turning on the upstart. GAP’s really just stirring the pot still further.  After all, in capitalist marketing all’s fair in sex, race – and money.

    The post Banking on Racism? The Blue Jean “War” is Just Beginning appeared first on CounterPunch.org.


    This content originally appeared on CounterPunch.org and was authored by Stewart Lawrence.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on The Real News Network and was authored by The Real News Network.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • Like many government agencies, the Department of Agriculture has a fraught history with discrimination and disenfranchisement. Farmers of color and young and beginning producers have long struggled to access capital, in the form of loans and grants, from the agency. 

    So in 2022, former President Joe Biden’s USDA created the Regional Food Business Centers program using funding from the American Rescue Plan. The program established 12 virtual centers to function as business development resource hubs within rural communities nationwide. The centers were intended as a way to provide technical assistance, navigate federal and state resources, and administer grants to small- and mid-sized farmers and ranchers who wanted to develop food businesses or access new markets. The overall goal was to build a more resilient food system.

    A total of roughly $400 million was earmarked to support the 12 centers, each run by a coalition of organizations and partners based in each region, which the USDA agreed to fund for five years. In 2024, many began distributing sub-awards from that pool of funds in the form of “business builder” grants.

    In early January, Ed Harvey, a Navajo farmer in rural northern Arizona, was awarded a technical assistance contract dedicated to assisting Indigenous producers from the Southwest Regional Food Business Center, which was created to strengthen local supply chains throughout Arizona, California, Nevada, and Utah. Not only does he grow apples, peaches, pears, plums, nectarines, cherries, and sumac berries, but Harvey runs a consulting business geared toward helping other Navajo tribal members through all of the paperwork needed in order to begin or continue farming on their land.

    Much of the farmland throughout Navajo Nation is left idle, buried in layers of dirt, wind deposits, and towering weeds, with slivers of corn, squash, and melons here and there. Harvey attributes the situation to the federal mandate that tribal members need a permit with a conservation plan in order to use their land for agricultural production. It’s an exceedingly onerous application process, and the reimbursable RFBC funding was intended to cover the costs associated with the development of conservation plans for other tribal members. When he heard he was selected for the program, Harvey was elated, and immediately began advertising the opportunity to work with him free of charge: He reached out to community farm boards, promoted it across all of the reservation’s chapter houses, and even posted flyers in local businesses. 

    That sense of joy morphed into one of sinking despair when, the following month, President Donald Trump’s administration abruptly froze the program’s funding, and a tsunami of layoffs at USDA and the Bureau of Indian Affairs saw thousands of federal workers leave their positions. The month of February, Harvey said, was the “worst of my life.” 

    “It hurt me. It hurt the business,” he said. “I did a lot of conservation plans for free, not getting paid for it, because I expressed to people that it’s paid for, so I didn’t want to let it ruin my reputation.” While the fate of the centers remained in purgatory, Harvey scrambled to remedy the damage done, completing 36 conservation projects at no charge, the equivalent of hundreds of unpaid hours and thousands of dollars worth of labor — a huge net loss.

    Finally, on July 15, the USDA announced it was shuttering the program, a decision that was met with considerable opposition across food and farming sectors. And just like that, Harvey’s big plans for his community went up in smoke. 

    “This was a program fully dedicated to support rural people. So I was thinking, ‘Heck, yeah, I can support my relatives who live in the middle of nowhere. I can find a way to help my uncle, to help with what he needs by planting corn,’” said Harvey. “Out here in Navajo Nation, you have to take in the fact that there’s very limited opportunities for people to make money. The tribe here, we live on government assistance…people don’t have that dedicated time to give back to the land, to give back to who they are. It takes funding mechanisms or opportunities to find [it].”

    Farmers tend land
    Ed Harvey grows apples, peaches, pears, plums, nectarines, cherries, and sumac berries in Salina Springs, a small Navajo chapter in northern Arizona.
    Ed Harvey

    In the press release announcing the end of the RFBCs, Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins criticized the Biden administration for creating the RFBCs “without any long-term way to finance them,” which the release described as a “COVID-era program.” The release also specified that “over 450” grants so far awarded would be honored — which meant that roughly four of the centers that hadn’t yet officially awarded their grant selections had 60 days to cease operations, and the other eight overseeing those awards would end next May. But even those centers still operating through next spring won’t be running at full capacity, as the cancellation limits the scope of what each center can do to no more than merely monitoring awards and technical assistance for existing grants. Rollins also stated that “any remaining funds will be repurposed to better support American agriculture.” As of this story’s publication, the details of that repurposing are not yet known. 

    Roughly a week after the USDA announced the end of the RFBCs, Rollins released a memo that again took the agricultural world by storm. The five-page document revealing Rollins’ plan to significantly reorganize the agency was accompanied by an unlisted YouTube video intended for employees, which also broadly detailed the four pillars powering the decision: ensuring the size of the agency’s workforce aligns with available resources and priorities, bringing USDA closer to those it serves by relocating resources, getting rid of bureaucracy, and paring down redundant support functions. 

    According to current and former USDA staffers, the closure of the country’s regional food business centers and the agency’s reorganization rollout should not be considered as separate developments, but rather as successive decisions with intertwining impacts. Both moves are expected to have lasting effects on historically underserved rural communities in particular, where farmers and families are already facing the day-to-day impacts of a shrinking federal workforce in local offices. That’s to say nothing of the growing role of climate change in throttling agricultural production and amplifying economic stressors such as increased price volatility, trade war disruptions, and surging labor and production costs.

    “To me, there is a real friction here between those in the administration that simply want to diminish, destroy, and decimate the federal workforce and any sort of policy goal that is aimed at improving the lives of Americans and reducing costs for those who live in rural communities,” said Michael Amato, former USDA communications director. So far in his second term, Trump’s USDA has gotten rid of more than 15,000 federal employees, nearly a fifth of its workforce, straining bureau capacity, even as the agency has culled billions of dollars in funding streams that, in the process, has buckled local and regional food systems. At least ten percent of the federal employees who have left the USDA this year worked for Rural Development, the nation’s lead agency that fights rural poverty. 

    “If there was some policy objective, then it’s lost on me, because I don’t see how simply just cutting funds to try to run up your DOGE score as high as possible, and calling for deferred resignations across the entire department with no strategic plan about where you see waste or where you see bureaucratic bloat,” Amato continued. “It just seems like a meat axe approach with the goal of shrinking the department.”

    Rollins did not specify a timeline for the plan, nor did she share many details of how it will be carried out, but noted that the agency will move more than half of the roughly 4,600 D.C. area employees out of the capital area. According to Rollins, the five hubs, located in Raleigh, North Carolina, Kansas City, Missouri, Indianapolis, Indiana, Fort Collins, Colorado, and Salt Lake City, Utah, would bring the USDA closer to its “core constituents.” The USDA did not respond to Grist’s request for comment. 

    Multiple current USDA employees told Grist that not even they have been briefed on the details of the reorganization. “We haven’t been given any more information than is publicly available,” said one USDA employee who is based in D.C. and asked to remain anonymous out of fear of retaliation. “It’s been unsettling. Morale is low. It has not been a great work environment, just because everyone feels insecure right now.” 

    “The relocation is actually going to be moving many of our regional office partners farther from the states that they cover,” the staffer continued. “The logic is just not there. It doesn’t make sense. And the claim that they’re moving up closer to the people we serve, is just patently false.” The USDA staffer added that the mass layoffs experienced have already resulted in overworked employees and significant delays in processing financial assistance applications. “There are things falling through the cracks,” they said. 

    On Thursday, August 21, a letter addressed to Rollins and signed by 32 USDA unions, and shared with Grist, also expressed widespread concerns about the reorganization. It noted that over 90 percent of USDA employees already live and work outside of the D.C. area and urged the department to “slow down, engage with Congress and the labor unions in good faith, and fully assess the true impacts of this reorganization before proceeding further.” 

    “We are just trying to call attention to how poorly planned the USDA reorganization is, that they seem to be hiding whatever details that they have,” said Ethan Roberts, a physical science technician at the USDA’s Agricultural Research Service based in Peoria, Illinois, who represents the bargaining unit employees at the National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research as union president. “There’s something going on. When I talk to the management in this building, they don’t know anything. They’ve not been told anything.

    “Why this is incredibly harmful is because the USDA is already struggling administratively,” Roberts continued. “Here in my laboratory, the management and the admin are taking on two to three jobs just to keep up to try and make everything continue to function. If we lose even more people in D.C., at the highest levels of the human resources department, and our budgeting and our billing, it’s going to be catastrophic. There’s going to be a critical administrative failure.”

    The lack of clarity has prompted plenty of congressional backlash, too. When news of the reorganization broke, a Senate hearing was swiftly assembled where a bipartisan contingency of Democrats and Republicans grilled Deputy Secretary of Agriculture Stephen Vaden about the unusually secretive nature of the rollout of the reorganization. Senate Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry ranking member Amy Klobuchar, a Democrat from Minnesota, said at the hearing that the committee first heard of the plan just minutes before it was announced. 

    “It is clear from the hearing that this is a half-baked reorganization plan developed without input from Congress or stakeholders that will almost certainly result in worse services for farmers, families, and rural communities,” Senator Klobuchar later told Grist. She noted that the reorganization “follows the cancellations or delays of funds for voluntary conservation programs that protect our environment and improve farmers’ bottom lines.” 

    Klobuchar and some of her colleagues on the Senate Agriculture Committee sent a letter to Vaden on Monday requesting more time to comment on the plan and increased transparency with the results of the agency’s ongoing public comment period. The letter followed at least two others that have been issued in the last month by groups of lawmakers demanding more information. Nearly all have referred to the first Trump administration’s relocation of the USDA’s Economic Research Service and National Institute of Food and Agriculture, which resulted in the resignation of three quarters of employees, and declining workforce productivity

    Kevin Shea, a 45-year veteran of USDA who led the agency’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service for 11 of those years, and briefly served as Secretary of Agriculture during the Biden administration, points to the USDA’s claim that the reorganization plan will bring staffers closer to constituents as one example of the contradictions at play. “This whole ruse about being closer to farmers — what nonsense. They’re still going to be in cities hundreds of miles from farmers,” said Shea. 

    What’s more, the RFBC program wasn’t solely addressing an immediate food system crisis that became clear because of the pandemic, he said, but “it was addressing a problem that had been revealed. The problem was always there.” A USDA report released last October found that the RFBCs led to more than 2,800 individuals receiving technical assistance, 1,500 new partnerships formed by recipients, and 287 businesses reporting increased revenue as a result of the program. Other critics of the Trump administration’s decision to cancel it have argued the program was established to meet a $4 billion congressional mandate in the American Rescue Plan to build more resilient food systems. 

    Another current USDA employee based in D.C., who also asked to remain anonymous, told Grist that the double blow of the closure of the regional food business centers and the proposed relocations “is going to result in massive harm to rural America which, again, is a population that they purport to care about.” “There’s no particular rhyme or reason that we can tell,” the staffer said, while pointing out where the new hubs aren’t. “California is the biggest agriculture state in the country, and there’s not a hub there. Doesn’t make any sense.” 

    “For farmers and people that rely on the USDA for information, for money, it’s going to be poorer quality service and less of it because there’s just going to be less people working,” said Roberts, the USDA union president. “If we experience an even greater loss of the administrative staff that keeps the USDA running, by telling them that they need to pick up their entire lives and move to somewhere across the country, the USDA is going to grind to a halt.”

    This story was originally published by Grist with the headline As the Trump administration shrinks the USDA, rural farming communities are left to pay the price on Aug 27, 2025.


    This content originally appeared on Grist and was authored by Ayurella Horn-Muller.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.

  • The fight for democracy in America didn’t begin, or end, at the ballot box. As labor organizer Erica Smiley, executive director of Jobs With Justice and co-author of The Future We Need: Organizing for a Better Democracy in the Twenty-First Century, reminds us, our democracy has always been “in training,” a work in progress shaped as much by picket lines as polling places.

    “Unions are schools for democracy,” Smiley explains. In workplaces where people of all backgrounds must build consensus and fight for fair contracts, we learn the skills that sustain a pluralistic society. It’s no surprise, then, that authoritarian movements often begin by attacking labor rights and education, because that’s where people learn to resist.

    From union-busting in the U.S. to neoliberal trade policies abroad, the erosion of collective bargaining has left millions disenfranchised not just politically, but economically.

    And that’s not just bad for workers: it’s fatal for democracy itself.

    If we want to rebuild democracy, we can’t just “vote harder.” We need to organize smarter. That means backing unions, pushing for economic policies that distribute power, and demanding that corporations, especially those exploiting AI and automation, share the wealth they’re extracting from human labor.

    As Smiley says, “Whoever’s in the White House, they still need us to make the cars.” That power can’t be ignored, unless we choose not to use it.

    We may not know what the next 15 years will bring. But if we organize now, we might just build a democracy worth fighting for.

    The song you heard in this week’s Gaslit Nation is “This Time” by Howard Jeffrey. Check out his music here: https://howardjeffrey.bandcamp.com/track/this-time. If you have a song to share on our show, submit your music to us at Gaslit Nation – we love hearing from you!: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1-d_DWNnDQFYUMXueYcX5ZVsA5t2RN09N8PYUQQ8koq0/edit?ts=5fee07f6&gxids=7628

    Want to enjoy Gaslit Nation ad-free? Join our community of listeners for bonus shows, exclusive Q&A sessions, our group chat, invites to live events like our Monday political salons at 4pm ET over Zoom, and more! Sign up at Patreon.com/Gaslit!

    EVENTS AT GASLIT NATION:

    • August 25 4pm ET – Join the Gaslit Nation Book Club for a powerful discussion on The Lives of Others and I’m Still Here, two films that explore how art and love endure and resist in the face of dictatorship.

    • Minnesota Signal group for Gaslit Nation listeners in the state to find each other, available on Patreon. 

    • Vermont Signal group for Gaslit Nation listeners in the state to find each other, available on Patreon. 

    • Arizona-based listeners launched a Signal group for others in the state to connect, available on Patreon. 

    • Indiana-based listeners launched a Signal group for others in the state to join, available on Patreon. 

    • Florida-based listeners are going strong meeting in person. Be sure to join their Signal group, available on Patreon. 

    • Have you taken Gaslit Nation’s HyperNormalization Survey Yet?

    • Gaslit Nation Salons take place Mondays 4pm ET over Zoom and the first ~40 minutes are recorded and shared on Patreon.com/Gaslit for our community


    This content originally appeared on Gaslit Nation and was authored by Andrea Chalupa.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on VICE News and was authored by VICE News.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on The Real News Network and was authored by The Real News Network.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty and was authored by Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.


  • This content originally appeared on VICE News and was authored by VICE News.

    This post was originally published on Radio Free.